Image description. Cover Image End of image description...

22
Image description. Cover Image End of image description. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS What Is IPEDS? The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from about 7,000 institutions that provide postsecondary education across the United States. IPEDS collects institution-level data on student enrollment, graduation rates, student charges, program completions, faculty, staff, and finances. These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (http://collegenavigator.ed.gov), an online tool to aid in the college search process. For more information about IPEDS, see http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds. What Is the Purpose of This Report? The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is to provide institutional executives a useful resource and to help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data. What Is in This Report? The figures in this report provide a selection of indicators for your institution to compare with a group of similar institutions. The figures draw from the data collected during the 2017-18 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. The inside cover of this report lists the pre-selected comparison group of institutions and the criteria used for their selection. The Methodological Notes at the end of the report describe additional information about these indicators and the pre-selected comparison group. Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data? Each institution can access previously released Data Feedback Reports from 2005 and customize this 2018 report by using a different comparison group and IPEDS variables of its choosing. To download archived reports or customize the current Data Feedback Report, please visit our website at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/Home/UseTheData. Central Connecticut State University New Britain, CT

Transcript of Image description. Cover Image End of image description...

Page 1: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description. Cover Image End of image description.

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

What Is IPEDS?

The Integrated Postsecondary Education DataSystem (IPEDS) is a system of survey componentsthat collects data from about 7,000 institutions thatprovide postsecondary education across the UnitedStates. IPEDS collects institution-level data onstudent enrollment, graduation rates, studentcharges, program completions, faculty, staff, andfinances.

These data are used at the federal and state level forpolicy analysis and development; at the institutionallevel for benchmarking and peer analysis; and bystudents and parents, through the College Navigator(http://collegenavigator.ed.gov), an online tool to aidin the college search process. For more informationabout IPEDS, see http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds.

What Is the Purpose of This Report?

The Data Feedback Report is intended to provideinstitutions a context for examining the data theysubmitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is toprovide institutional executives a useful resource andto help improve the quality and comparability ofIPEDS data.

What Is in This Report?

The figures in this report provide a selection ofindicators for your institution to compare with a groupof similar institutions. The figures draw from the datacollected during the 2017-18 IPEDS collection cycleand are the most recent data available. The insidecover of this report lists the pre-selected comparisongroup of institutions and the criteria used for theirselection. The Methodological Notes at the end of thereport describe additional information about theseindicators and the pre-selected comparison group.

Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data?

Each institution can access previously released DataFeedback Reports from 2005 and customize this2018 report by using a different comparison groupand IPEDS variables of its choosing. To downloadarchived reports or customize the current DataFeedback Report, please visit our website athttp://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/Home/UseTheData.

Central Connecticut State UniversityNew Britain, CT

Page 2: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Central Connecticut State University  

COMPARISON GROUPComparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting your institution’s statistics. For this report, you specified a customcomparison group.

You described this custom comparison group as follows: Aspirational

The custom comparison group chosen by Central Connecticut State University includes the following 15 institutions:

Ball State University (Muncie, IN)Bowling Green State University-Main Campus (Bowling Green, OH)California State University-Chico (Chico, CA)East Carolina University (Greenville, NC)Mississippi State University (Mississippi State, MS)Oklahoma State University-Main Campus (Stillwater, OK)Rutgers University-Newark (Newark, NJ)The University of West Florida (Pensacola, FL)University of Idaho (Moscow, ID)University of Massachusetts-Boston (Boston, MA)University of Massachusetts-Lowell (Lowell, MA)University of Missouri-St Louis (Saint Louis, MO)University of North Carolina at Charlotte (Charlotte, NC)University of North Dakota (Grand Forks, ND)Western Washington University (Bellingham, WA)

The figures in this report have been organized and ordered into the following topic areas:

1) Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools) Fig. 1, 2, 3 and 4 Pg. 32) Student Enrollment Fig. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 Pg. 4, 5 and 63) Awards Fig. 13 and 14 Pg. 6 and 74) Charges and Net Price Fig. 15 and 16 Pg. 75) Student Financial Aid Fig. 17, 18, 19 and 20 Pg. 7 and 86) Military Benefits* Fig. 21 and 22 Pg. 8 and 97) Retention and Graduation Rates Fig. 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36 Pg. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 148) Finance Fig. 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42 Pg. 15 and 169) Staff Fig. 43, 44 and 45 Pg. 16 and 1710) Libraries* Fig. 46 and 47 Pg. 17

*These figures only appear in customized Data Feedback Reports (DFR), which are available through Use the Data portal on the IPEDS website.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 2

Page 3: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Admissions measureHorizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Applicants.Item 1, Your institution 7870.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 13435.Group 2, Admitted.Item 1, Your institution 5254.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 8719.Group 3, Enrolled full time.Item 1, Your institution 1421.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 2769.Group 4, Enrolled part time.Item 1, Your institution 12.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 19. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Admissions measureHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Admitted.Item 1, Your institution 67.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 73.Group 2, Enrolled full time.Item 1, Your institution 27.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 31.Group 3, Enrolled part time.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Subject and percentileHorizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Score.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, 75th percentile Evidence-Based Reading and Writing.Item 1, Your institution 590.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=14) 630.Group 2, 25th percentile Evidence-Based Reading and Writing.Item 1, Your institution 500.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=14) 530.Group 3, 75th percentile Math.Item 1, Your institution 570.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=14) 610.Group 4, 25th percentile Math.Item 1, Your institution 480.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=14) 525. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=14) End of image description.

Image description.Subject and percentileHorizontal Bar chart with 6 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Score.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, 75th percentile Composite.Item 1, Your institution 24.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=14) 26.Group 2, 25th percentile Composite.Item 1, Your institution 19.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=14) 21.Group 3, 75th percentile English.Item 1, Your institution 24.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=14) 27.Group 4, 25th percentile English.Item 1, Your institution 18.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=14) 21.Group 5, 75th percentile Math.Item 1, Your institution 24.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=14) 26.Group 6, 25th percentile Math.Item 1, Your institution 17.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=14) 20. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=14) End of image description.

Central Connecticut State University  

Figure 1. Number of first-time undergraduate students whoapplied, were admitted, and enrolled full and part time:Fall 2017

0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000

Number of students

Enrolled part time

Enrolled full time

Admitted

Applicants

19

12

2,769

1,421

8,719

5,254

13,435

7,870

Admissions measure

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Admissions data are presented only for institutions that do not have an openadmission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduatestudents only. For details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions inthe comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, Admissionscomponent.

Figure 2. Percent of first-time undergraduate applicants admitted,and percent of admissions enrolled, by full- and part-timestatus: Fall 2017

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of students

Enrolled part time

Enrolled full time

Admitted

0

0

31

27

73

67

Admissions measure

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Admissions data are presented only for institutions that do not have an openadmission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduatestudents only. For details, see the Methodological Notes. Median values for thecomparison group will not add to 100%. See "Use of Median Values for ComparisonGroup" for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in thecomparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, Admissionscomponent.

Figure 3. Percentile SAT scores of first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students: Fall 2017

0 200 400 600 800

Score

25th percentileMath

75th percentileMath

25th percentile Evidence-Based..

75th percentile Evidence-Based..

525

480

610

570

530

500

630

590

Subject and percentile

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=14)

NOTE: Test score data are presented only for institutions that do not have an openadmission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduatestudents only. Institutions report test scores only if they are required for admission. N isthe number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, Admissionscomponent.

Figure 4. Percentile ACT scores of first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students: Fall 2017

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Score

25th percentileMath

75th percentileMath

25th percentileEnglish

75th percentileEnglish

25th percentileComposite

75th percentileComposite

20

17

26

24

21

18

27

24

21

19

26

24

Subject and percentile

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=14)

NOTE: Test score data are presented only for institutions that do not have an openadmission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduatestudents only. Institutions report test scores only if they are required for admission. N isthe number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, Admissionscomponent.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 3

Page 4: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Scale label.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, American Indian or Alaska Native.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01.Group 2, Asian.Item 1, Your institution 4.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 3.Group 3, Black or African American.Item 1, Your institution 12.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 8.Group 4, Hispanic/Latino.Item 1, Your institution 13.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 9.Group 5, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01.Group 6, White.Item 1, Your institution 63.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 67.Group 7, Two or more races.Item 1, Your institution 3.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 3.Group 8, Race/ethnicity unknown.Item 1, Your institution 3.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 3.Group 9, Nonresident alien.Item 1, Your institution 2.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 5.Group 10, Women.Item 1, Your institution 50.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 54.Race/ethnicity or gender Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Enrollment measureHorizontal Bar chart with 5 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Unduplicated headcount - total.Item 1, Your institution 13930.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 20882.Group 2, Unduplicated headcount - undergraduates.Item 1, Your institution 10980.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 16592.Group 3, Total FTE enrollment.Item 1, Your institution 9683.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 14346.Group 4, Full-time fall enrollment.Item 1, Your institution 8253.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 14430.Group 5, Part-time fall enrollment.Item 1, Your institution 3627.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 5362. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Level of studentHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Total.Item 1, Your institution 11880.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 17357.Group 2, Undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 9554.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 14680.Group 3, First-time, degree/ certificate-seeking undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 1433.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 2805.Group 4, Transfer-in, degree/certificate- seeking undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 1039.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 1425.Group 5, Continuing, degree/certificate- seeking undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 6845.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 9841.Group 6, Nondegree/ certificate-seeking undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 237.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 589.Group 7, Graduate.Item 1, Your institution 2326.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 3571. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Central Connecticut State University  

Figure 5. Percent of all students enrolled, by race/ethnicity, and percent of students who are women: Fall 2017

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

American Indian orAlaska Native

Asian Black orAfrican American

Hispanic/Latino Native Hawaiian or other.. White Two or more races Race/ethnicityunknown

Nonresident alien Women

0 04 3

128

139

0 0

6367

3 3 3 3 25

5054

Race/ethnicity or gender

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. See "Use ofMedian Values for Comparison Group" for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Fall Enrollment component.

Figure 6. Unduplicated 12-month headcount of all students and ofundergraduate students (2016-17), total FTE enrollment(2016-17), and full- and part-time fall enrollment (Fall2017)

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000

Number of students

Part-timefall enrollment

Full-timefall enrollment

Total FTEenrollment

Unduplicated headcount -..

Unduplicatedheadcount - total

5,362

3,627

14,430

8,253

14,346

9,683

16,592

10,980

20,882

13,930

Enrollment measure

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: For details on calculating full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, see CalculatingFTE in the Methodological Notes. Total headcount, FTE, and full- and part-time fallenrollment include both undergraduate and postbaccalaureate students, when applicable.N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2017, 12-monthEnrollment component and Spring 2018, Fall Enrollment component.

Figure 7. Enrollment, by student level: Fall 2017

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000

Number of students

Graduate

Nondegree/ certificate-seeking..

Continuing, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate

Transfer-in, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate

First-time, degree/ certificate-seeking..

Undergraduate

Total

3,5712,326

589237

9,8416,845

1,4251,039

2,8051,433

14,6809,554

17,35711,880

Level of student

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Fall Enrollmentcomponent.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 4

Page 5: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Level of full-time studentHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Total full-time.Item 1, Your institution 8253.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 14430.Group 2, Undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 7605.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 13104.Group 3, First-time, degree/certificate- seeking undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 1421.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 2769.Group 4, Transfer-in, degree/certificate- seeking undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 795.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 1092.Group 5, Continuing, degree/certificate- seeking undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 5377.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 9193.Group 6, Nondegree/certificate- seeking undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 12.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 74.Group 7, Graduate.Item 1, Your institution 648.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 1342. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Level of part-time studentHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Total part-time.Item 1, Your institution 3627.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 5362.Group 2, Undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 1949.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 2719.Group 3, First-time, degree/certificate- seeking undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 12.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 19.Group 4, Transfer-in, degree/certificate- seeking undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 244.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 289.Group 5, Continuing, degree/certificate- seeking undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 1468.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 1541.Group 6, Nondegree/certificate- seeking undergraduate.Item 1, Your institution 225.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 423.Group 7, Graduate.Item 1, Your institution 1678.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 2369. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Scale label.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, American Indian or Alaska Native.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01.Group 2, Asian.Item 1, Your institution 4.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 3.Group 3, Black or African American.Item 1, Your institution 13.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 9.Group 4, Hispanic/Latino.Item 1, Your institution 14.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 9.Group 5, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01.Group 6, White.Item 1, Your institution 61.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 68.Group 7, Two or more races.Item 1, Your institution 3.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 3.Group 8, Race/ethnicity unknown.Item 1, Your institution 3.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 2.Group 9, Nonresident alien.Item 1, Your institution 2.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 3.Group 10, Women.Item 1, Your institution 47.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 53.Race/ethnicity or gender Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Central Connecticut State University  

Figure 8. Full-time enrollment, by student level: Fall 2017

0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000

Number of students

Graduate

Nondegree/certificate-seeking undergraduate

Continuing, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate

Transfer-in, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate

First-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate

Undergraduate

Total full-time

1,342648

7412

9,1935,377

1,092795

2,7691,421

13,1047,605

14,4308,253

Level of full-time student

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Fall Enrollmentcomponent.

Figure 9. Part-time enrollment, by student level: Fall 2017

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000

Number of students

Graduate

Nondegree/certificate-seeking undergraduate

Continuing, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate

Transfer-in, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate

First-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate

Undergraduate

Total part-time

2,3691,678

423225

1,5411,468

289244

1912

2,7191,949

5,3623,627

Level of part-time student

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Fall Enrollmentcomponent.

Figure 10. Percent of all undergraduate students enrolled, by race/ethnicity, and percent of students who are women: Fall 2017

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

American Indian orAlaska Native

Asian Black orAfrican American

Hispanic/Latino Native Hawaiian or other.. White Two or more races Race/ethnicityunknown

Nonresident alien Women

0 04 3

139

149

0 0

61

68

3 3 3 2 2 3

4753

Race/ethnicity or gender

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. See "Use ofMedian Values for Comparison Group" for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Fall Enrollment component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 5

Page 6: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Scale label.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, American Indian or Alaska Native.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01.Group 2, Asian.Item 1, Your institution 3.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 3.Group 3, Black or African American.Item 1, Your institution 10.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 6.Group 4, Hispanic/Latino.Item 1, Your institution 9.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 5.Group 5, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01.Group 6, White.Item 1, Your institution 72.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 66.Group 7, Two or more races.Item 1, Your institution 2.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 2.Group 8, Race/ethnicity unknown.Item 1, Your institution 3.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 4.Group 9, Nonresident alien.Item 1, Your institution 2.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 13.Group 10, Women.Item 1, Your institution 64.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 62.Race/ethnicity or gender Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Distance education participationHorizontal Bar chart with 6 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Undergraduates exclusively in distance education.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 4.Group 2, Undergraduates in some but not all distance education.Item 1, Your institution 6.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 22.Group 3, Undergraduates not in any distance education.Item 1, Your institution 94.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 72.Group 4, Graduate students exclusively in distance education.Item 1, Your institution 4.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 25.Group 5, Graduate students in some but not all distance education.Item 1, Your institution 7.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 9.Group 6, Graduate students not enrolled in any distance education.Item 1, Your institution 88.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 64. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Level of degreeHorizontal Bar chart with 6 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of degrees.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Doctor's Research/ Scholarship.Item 1, Your institution 13.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 77.Group 2, Doctor's Professional Practice.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 37.Group 3, Doctor's Other.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01.Group 4, Master's.Item 1, Your institution 604.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 860.Group 5, Bachelor's.Item 1, Your institution 1958.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 2946.Group 6, Associate's.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Central Connecticut State University  

Figure 11. Percent of all graduate students enrolled, by race/ethnicity, and percent of students who are women: Fall 2017

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

American Indian orAlaska Native

Asian Black orAfrican American

Hispanic/Latino Native Hawaiian or other.. White Two or more races Race/ethnicityunknown

Nonresident alien Women

0 03 3

106

95

0 0

7266

2 2 3 4 2

13

64 62

Race/ethnicity or gender

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. See "Use ofMedian Values for Comparison Group" for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Fall Enrollment component.

Figure 12. Percent of students taking distance education courses,by amount of distance education and student level: Fall2017

0 20 40 60 80 100

Percent of students

Graduate students not enrolledin any distance education

Graduate students in somebut not all distance education

Graduate students exclusively indistance education

Undergraduates not inany distance education

Undergraduates in somebut not all distance education

Undergraduates exclusivelyin distance education

6488

97

254

7294

226

40

Distance education participation

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Fall Enrollmentcomponent.

Figure 13. Number of degrees awarded, by level: 2016-17

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000

Number of degrees

Associate's

Bachelor's

Master's

Doctor's Other

Doctor's Professional..

Doctor's Research/..

00

2,9461,958

860604

00

370

7713

Level of degree

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: For additional information about postbaccalaureate degree levels, see theMethodology Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2017, Completionscomponent.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 6

Page 7: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Level of degreeHorizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Doctor's.Item 1, Your institution 13.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 137.Group 2, Master's.Item 1, Your institution 604.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 858.Group 3, Bachelor's.Item 1, Your institution 1958.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 2933.Group 4, Associate's.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Academic yearHorizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Tuition and fees.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, 2017-18.Item 1, Your institution $10225.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $8447.Group 2, 2016-17.Item 1, Your institution $9741.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $8136.Group 3, 2015-16.Item 1, Your institution $9300.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $7965.Group 4, 2014-15.Item 1, Your institution $8877.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $7741. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Academic yearHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Net price.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, 2016-17.Item 1, Your institution $15860.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $14478.Group 2, 2015-16.Item 1, Your institution $14852.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $13645.Group 3, 2014-15.Item 1, Your institution $15273.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $13583. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Type of aidHorizontal Bar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Any grant aid.Item 1, Your institution 61.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 77.Group 2, Federal grants.Item 1, Your institution 32.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 34.Group 3, Pell grants.Item 1, Your institution 32.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 34.Group 4, State/local grants.Item 1, Your institution 25.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 31.Group 5, Institutional grants.Item 1, Your institution 49.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 66.Group 6, Any loans.Item 1, Your institution 64.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 53.Group 7, Federal loans.Item 1, Your institution 63.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 52.Group 8, Other loans.Item 1, Your institution 8.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 7. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Central Connecticut State University  

Figure 14. Number of students completing a degree, by level: 2016-17

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000

Number of students

Associate's

Bachelor's

Master's

Doctor's

0

0

2,933

1,958

858

604

137

13

Level of degree

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: For additional information about postbaccalaureate degree levels, see theMethodology Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2017, Completionscomponent.

Figure 15. Academic year tuition and required fees for full-time,first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates:2014-15 to 2017-18

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000

Tuition and fees

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

$7,741

$8,877

$7,965

$9,300

$8,136

$9,741

$8,447

$10,225

Academic year

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: The tuition and required fees shown here are the lowest reported from thecategories of in-district, in-state, and out-of-state. N is the number of institutions in thecomparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2017, InstitutionalCharacteristics component.

Figure 16. Average net price of attendance for full-time, first-timedegree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students, whowere awarded grant or scholarship aid: 2014-15 to 2016-17

$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000

Net price

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

$13,583

$15,273

$13,645

$14,852

$14,478

$15,860

Academic year

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Average net price is for full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seekingundergraduate students and is generated by subtracting the average amount of federal,state/local government, and institutional grant and scholarship awarded aid from the totalcost of attendance. Total cost of attendance is the sum of published tuition and requiredfees, books and supplies, and the average room and board and other expenses. Fordetails, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparisongroup.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2017, InstitutionalCharacteristics component and Winter 2017-18, Student Financial Aid component.

Figure 17. Percent of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seekingundergraduate students who were awarded grant orscholarship aid from the federal government, state/localgovernment, or the institution, or loans, by type of aid:2016-17

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of students

Other loans

Federalloans

Any loans

Institutionalgrants

State/localgrants

Pellgrants

Federalgrants

Any grantaid

78

5263

5364

6649

3125

3432

3432

7761

Type of aid

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federalgovernment, state/local government, or the institution. Federal grants includes Pell grantsand other federal grants. Any loans includes federal loans and other loans awarded tostudents. For details on how students are counted for financial aid reporting, see CohortDetermination in the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in thecomparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, StudentFinancial Aid component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 7

Page 8: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Type of aidHorizontal Bar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Aid dollars.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Any grant aid.Item 1, Your institution $7567.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $8615.Group 2, Federal grants.Item 1, Your institution $4565.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $4663.Group 3, Pell grants.Item 1, Your institution $4523.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $4462.Group 4, State/local grants.Item 1, Your institution $2753.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $2795.Group 5, Institutional grants.Item 1, Your institution $5074.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $5451.Group 6, Any loans.Item 1, Your institution $6929.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $6916.Group 7, Federal loans.Item 1, Your institution $5524.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $5663.Group 8, Other loans.Item 1, Your institution $12018.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $11743. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Type of aidHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Any grant aid.Item 1, Your institution 52.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 62.Group 2, Pell grants.Item 1, Your institution 34.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 32.Group 3, Federal loans.Item 1, Your institution 57.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 50. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Type of aidHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Aid dollars.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Any grant aid.Item 1, Your institution $6409.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $8233.Group 2, Pell grants.Item 1, Your institution $4102.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $4203.Group 3, Federal loans.Item 1, Your institution $7010.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $6687. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Type of benefitHorizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of students.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Post-9/11 undergraduates.Item 1, Your institution 135.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 271.Group 2, Post-9/11 graduates.Item 1, Your institution 16.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 56.Group 3, TAP undergraduates.Item 1, Your institution 2.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 11.Group 4, TAP graduates.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 8. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Central Connecticut State University  

Figure 18. Average amounts of awarded grant or scholarship aidfrom the federal government, state/local government, orthe institution, or loans awarded to full-time, first-timedegree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students, bytype of aid: 2016-17

$0 $2,500 $5,000 $7,500 $10,000 $12,500

Aid dollars

Other loans

Federalloans

Any loans

Institutionalgrants

State/localgrants

Pellgrants

Federalgrants

Any grantaid

$11,743$12,018

$5,663$5,524

$6,916$6,929

$5,451$5,074

$2,795$2,753

$4,462$4,523

$4,663$4,565

$8,615$7,567

Type of aid

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federalgovernment, state/local government, or the institution. Federal grants includes Pell grantsand other federal grants. Any loans includes federal loans and other loans awarded tostudents. Average amounts of aid were calculated by dividing the total aid awarded by thetotal number of recipients in each institution. N is the number of institutions in thecomparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, StudentFinancial Aid component.

Figure 19. Percent of all undergraduates awarded aid, by type ofaid: 2016-17

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of students

Federalloans

Pell grants

Any grant aid

50

57

32

34

62

52

Type of aid

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federalgovernment, state/local government, the institution, or other sources. Federal loansincludes only federal loans awarded to students. N is the number of institutions in thecomparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, StudentFinancial Aid component.

Figure 20. Average amount of aid awarded to all undergraduates, bytype of aid: 2016-17

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000

Aid dollars

Federal loans

Pell grants

Any grant aid

$6,687

$7,010

$4,203

$4,102

$8,233

$6,409

Type of aid

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid from the federal government,state/local government, the institution, or other sources. Federal loans includes federalloans to students. Average amounts of aid were calculated by dividing the total aidawarded by the total number of recipients in each institution. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, StudentFinancial Aid component.

Figure 21. Number of students receiving military educationalbenefits, by benefit type and student level: 2016-17

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Number of students

TAP graduates

TAP undergraduates

Post-9/11 graduates

Post-9/11 undergraduates

8

1

11

2

56

16

271

135

Type of benefit

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. Post-9/11 refers to theDepartment of Veteran Affairs Post-9/11 G.I. Bill educational benefit. TAP refers to theDepartment of Defense Tuition Assistance Program educational benefit.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, StudentFinancial Aid component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 8

Page 9: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Type of benefitHorizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Benefit dollars.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Post-9/11 undergraduates (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 7534.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 6774.Group 2, Post-9/11 graduates (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 5396.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 5874.Group 3, TAP undergraduates (N=14).Item 1, Your institution 1125.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 2009.Group 4, TAP graduates (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 2250.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 1958. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median End of image description.

Image description.Attendance levelHorizontal Bar chart with 2 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Full-time retention rate.Item 1, Your institution 76.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 81.Group 2, Part-time retention rate.Item 1, Your institution 64.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 56. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.MeasureHorizontal Bar chart with 2 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Graduation rate, Overall (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 52.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 58.Group 2, Transfer-out rate (N=10).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 20. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median End of image description.

Central Connecticut State University  

Figure 22. Average amount of military educational benefitsreceived, by benefit type and student level: 2016-17

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000

Benefit dollars

TAP graduates (N=12)

TAP undergraduates (N=14)

Post-9/11 graduates (N=15)

Post-9/11 undergraduates (N=15)

1,958

2,250

2,009

1,125

5,874

5,396

6,774

7,534

Type of benefit

Your institution Comparison Group Median

NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. Post-9/11 refers to theDepartment of Veteran Affairs Post-9/11 G.I. Bill educational benefit. TAP refers to theDepartment of Defense Tuition Assistance Program educational benefit.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, StudentFinancial Aid component.

Figure 23. Retention rates of first-time bachelor's degree seekingstudents, by attendance level: Fall 2016 cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Part-time retentionrate

Full-time retention rate

56

64

81

76

Attendance level

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Retention rates are measured from the fall of first enrollment to the following fall.Academic reporting institutions report retention data as of the institution"s official fallreporting date or as of October 15, 2016. Program reporters determine the cohort withenrollment any time between August 1-October 31, 2016 and retention based on August1, 2017. Four-year institutions report retention rates for students seeking a bachelor"sdegree. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions inthe comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Fall Enrollmentcomponent.

Figure 24. Graduation and transfer-out rates of full-time, first-timedegree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within 150%of normal time to program completion: 2011 cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Transfer-out rate (N=10)

Graduation rate,Overall (N=15)

20

58

52

Measure

Your institution Comparison Group Median

NOTE: Graduation rate cohort includes all full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seekingundergraduate students. Graduation and transfer-out rates are the Student Right-to-Knowrates. Only institutions with mission to prepare students to transfer are required to reporttransfer out. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, GraduationRates component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 9

Page 10: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Scale label.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, Graduation rate, Overall (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 52.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 58.Group 2, American Indian or Alaska Native (N=14).Item 1, Your institution 33.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 47.Group 3, Asian (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 51.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 60.Group 4, Black or African American (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 43.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 46.Group 5, Hispanic/ Latino (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 39.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 51.Group 6, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (N=14).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 33.Group 7, White (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 55.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 63.Group 8, Two or more races (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 64.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 53.Group 9, Race/ethnicity unknown (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 45.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 50.Group 10, Nonresident alien (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 33.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 61.Graduation rates by race/ethnicity Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median End of image description.

Image description.Student aidHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Pell grant.Item 1, Your institution 46.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 50.Group 2, Stafford loan.Item 1, Your institution 53.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 59.Group 3, Neither Pell grant or Stafford loan.Item 1, Your institution 56.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 64. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Student aidHorizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Total.Item 1, Your institution 52.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 58.Group 2, Pell grant.Item 1, Your institution 46.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 50.Group 3, Stafford loan.Item 1, Your institution 53.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 59.Group 4, Neither Pell grant or Stafford loan.Item 1, Your institution 56.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 64. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Central Connecticut State University  

Figure 25. Graduation rates of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within 150% of normal time to programcompletion, by race/ethnicity: 2011 cohort

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

Graduation rate,Overall (N=15)

American Indian orAlaska Native (N=14)

Asian (N=15) Black or AfricanAmerican (N=15)

Hispanic/Latino (N=15)

Native Hawaiian orother Pacific Islander (N=14)

White (N=15)

Two ormore races (N=15)

Race/ethnicityunknown (N=15)

Nonresidentalien (N=15)

5258

33

4751

60

4346

39

51

33

55

63 64

53

4550

33

61

Graduation rates by race/ethnicity

Your institution Comparison Group Median

NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. The graduation rates are the Student Right-to-Know (SRK) rates. Medianvalues for the comparison group will not add to 100%. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, Graduation Ratescomponent.

Figure 26. Graduation rates of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within 150% of normal time toprogram completion, by financial aid recipients: 2011cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Neither Pell grantor Stafford loan

Stafford loan

Pell grant

64

56

59

53

50

46

Student aid

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Graduation rate cohort includes all full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seekingundergraduate students. Data were collected on those students, who at entry of thecohort, were awarded a Pell Grant and students who were awarded a Subsidized Staffordloan, but did not receive a Pell Grant. Graduation rates are the Student Right-to-Knowrates. Only institutions with mission to prepare students to transfer are required to reporttransfer out. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, GraduationRates component.

Figure 27. Graduation rates of full-time, first-time bachelor's degree-seeking undergraduates within 6 years, by financial aidtype: 2011 cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Neither Pell grantor Stafford loan

Stafford loan

Pell grant

Total

64

56

59

53

50

46

58

52

Student aid

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Graduation rate cohort includes all full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seekingundergraduate students. Data were collected on those students, who at entry of thecohort, were awarded a Pell Grant and students who were awarded a Subsidized Staffordloan, but did not receive a Pell Grant. Graduation rates are the Student Right-to-Knowrates. Only institutions with mission to prepare students to transfer are required to reporttransfer out. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, GraduationRates component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 10

Page 11: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Time to program completionHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Graduation rate.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, 4 years.Item 1, Your institution 25.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 31.Group 2, 6 years.Item 1, Your institution 57.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 57.Group 3, 8 years.Item 1, Your institution 61.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 61. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Central Connecticut State University  

Figure 28. Bachelor's degree graduation rates of full-time,first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduateswithin 4 years, 6 years, and 8 years: 2009 cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Graduation rate

8 years

6 years

4 years

61

61

57

57

31

25

Time to program completion

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: The 4-, 6-, and 8-year graduation rates are calculated using the number studentswho completed a bachelor's or equivalent degree from a cohort of students who enteredthe institution seeking a bachelor's or equivalent degree. For details, see theMethodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. Mediansare not reported for comparison groups with less than three values.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, 200%Graduation Rates component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 11

Central Connecticut State University

Page 12: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Scale label.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, Received award in 4 years.Item 1, Your institution 19.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 25.Group 2, Received award in 6 years.Item 1, Your institution 50.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 50.Group 3, Received award in 8 years.Item 1, Your institution 55.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 52.Group 4, Still enrolled at same institution.Item 1, Your institution 2.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 1.Group 5, Enrolled at another institution.Item 1, Your institution 27.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 29.Group 6, Received award in 4 years.Item 1, Your institution 26.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 35.Group 7, Received award in 6 years.Item 1, Your institution 58.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 62.Group 8, Received award in 8 years.Item 1, Your institution 61.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 64.Group 9, Still enrolled at same institution.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 1.Group 10, Enrolled at another institution.Item 1, Your institution 27.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 25.Completion and enrollment measures Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Scale label.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, Received award in 4 years.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01.Group 2, Received award in 6 years.Item 1, Your institution 29.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 20.Group 3, Received award in 8 years.Item 1, Your institution 29.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 20.Group 4, Still enrolled at same institution.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01.Group 5, Enrolled at another institution.Item 1, Your institution 14.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 32.Group 6, Received award in 4 years.Item 1, Your institution 11.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 13.Group 7, Received award in 6 years.Item 1, Your institution 11.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 27.Group 8, Received award in 8 years.Item 1, Your institution 11.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 29.Group 9, Still enrolled at same institution.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01.Group 10, Enrolled at another institution.Item 1, Your institution 44.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 35.Completion and enrollment measures Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

 Figure 29. Award and enrollment rates of first-time, full-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 years of entry, by Pell status,

2009-10 cohort

Pell Non-Pell (N=15) (N=15)              

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

Received awardin 4 years

Received awardin 6 years

Received awardin 8 years

Still enrolled atsame institution

Enrolled atanother institution

Received awardin 4 years

Received awardin 6 years

Received awardin 8 years

Still enrolled atsame institution

Enrolled atanother institution

1925

50 5055

52

2 1

27 2926

35

5862 61

64

1 1

27 25

Completion and enrollment measures

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Award measures are based on the highest award received after 8 years of entry and enrollment measures are based on student who did not received an award after 8 years ofentry. Student cohorts (i.e., First-time, full-time; First-time, part-time; Non-first-time, full-time; and Non-first-time, part-time) are degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students whoentered the institution between July 1, 2009-June 30, 2010. Pell recipients are students with demonstrated financial need. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is thenumber of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, Outcome Measurescomponent.

Figure 30. Award and enrollment rates of first-time, part-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 years of entry, by Pell status,2009-10 cohort

Pell Non-Pell (N=15) (N=15)              

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

Received awardin 4 years

Received awardin 6 years

Received awardin 8 years

Still enrolled atsame institution

Enrolled atanother institution

Received awardin 4 years

Received awardin 6 years

Received awardin 8 years

Still enrolled atsame institution

Enrolled atanother institution

0 0

29

20

29

20

0 0

14

32

11 13 11

27

11

29

0 0

44

35

Completion and enrollment measures

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Award measures are based on the highest award received after 8 years of entry and enrollment measures are based on student who did not received an award after 8 years ofentry. Student cohorts (i.e., First-time, full-time; First-time, part-time; Non-first-time, full-time; and Non-first-time, part-time) are degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students whoentered the institution between July 1, 2009-June 30, 2010. Pell recipients are students with demonstrated financial need. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is thenumber of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, Outcome Measurescomponent.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 12

Central Connecticut State University  

Page 13: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Scale label.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, Received award in 4 years.Item 1, Your institution 46.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 51.Group 2, Received award in 6 years.Item 1, Your institution 57.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 60.Group 3, Received award in 8 years.Item 1, Your institution 61.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 62.Group 4, Still enrolled at same institution.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 1.Group 5, Enrolled at another institution.Item 1, Your institution 23.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 21.Group 6, Received award in 4 years.Item 1, Your institution 50.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 58.Group 7, Received award in 6 years.Item 1, Your institution 62.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 65.Group 8, Received award in 8 years.Item 1, Your institution 64.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 66.Group 9, Still enrolled at same institution.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01.Group 10, Enrolled at another institution.Item 1, Your institution 20.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 17.Completion and enrollment measures Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Scale label.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, Received award in 4 years.Item 1, Your institution 25.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 40.Group 2, Received award in 6 years.Item 1, Your institution 48.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 52.Group 3, Received award in 8 years.Item 1, Your institution 50.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 52.Group 4, Still enrolled at same institution.Item 1, Your institution 3.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 1.Group 5, Enrolled at another institution.Item 1, Your institution 23.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 21.Group 6, Received award in 4 years.Item 1, Your institution 27.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 30.Group 7, Received award in 6 years.Item 1, Your institution 43.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 38.Group 8, Received award in 8 years.Item 1, Your institution 47.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 42.Group 9, Still enrolled at same institution.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 2.Group 10, Enrolled at another institution.Item 1, Your institution 24.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 24.Completion and enrollment measures Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Figure 31. Award and enrollment rates of non-first-time, full-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 years of entry, by Pellstatus, 2009-10 cohort

Pell Non-Pell (N=15) (N=15)              

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

Received awardin 4 years

Received awardin 6 years

Received awardin 8 years

Still enrolled atsame institution

Enrolled atanother institution

Received awardin 4 years

Received awardin 6 years

Received awardin 8 years

Still enrolled atsame institution

Enrolled atanother institution

4651

5760 61 62

1 1

23 21

50

5862

65 64 66

1 0

20 17

Completion and enrollment measures

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Award measures are based on the highest award received after 8 years of entry and enrollment measures are based on student who did not received an award after 8 years ofentry. Student cohorts (i.e., First-time, full-time; First-time, part-time; Non-first-time, full-time; and Non-first-time, part-time) are degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students whoentered the institution between July 1, 2009-June 30, 2010. Pell recipients are students with demonstrated financial need. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is thenumber of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, Outcome Measurescomponent.

Figure 32. Award and enrollment rates of non-first-time, part-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 years of entry, by Pellstatus, 2009-10 cohort

Pell Non-Pell (N=15) (N=15)              

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

Received awardin 4 years

Received awardin 6 years

Received awardin 8 years

Still enrolled atsame institution

Enrolled atanother institution

Received awardin 4 years

Received awardin 6 years

Received awardin 8 years

Still enrolled atsame institution

Enrolled atanother institution

25

40

4852 50 52

3 1

23 2127

30

4338

4742

1 2

24 24

Completion and enrollment measures

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Award measures are based on the highest award received after 8 years of entry and enrollment measures are based on student who did not received an award after 8 years ofentry. Student cohorts (i.e., First-time, full-time; First-time, part-time; Non-first-time, full-time; and Non-first-time, part-time) are degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students whoentered the institution between July 1, 2009-June 30, 2010. Pell recipients are students with demonstrated financial need. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is thenumber of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, Outcome Measurescomponent.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 13

Central Connecticut State University  

Page 14: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Award LevelHorizontal Bar chart with 6 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Bachelor's, Pell (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 55.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 52.Group 2, Associate's, Pell (N=5).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 1.Group 3, Certificates, Pell (N=10).Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01.Group 4, Bachelor's, non-Pell (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 61.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 62.Group 5, Associate's, non-Pell (N=5).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 2.Group 6, Certificates, non-Pell (N=10).Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median End of image description.

Image description.Award LevelHorizontal Bar chart with 6 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Bachelor's, Pell (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 29.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 20.Group 2, Associate's, Pell (N=5).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01.Group 3, Certificates, Pell (N=10).Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01.Group 4, Bachelor's, non-Pell (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 11.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 27.Group 5, Associate's, non-Pell (N=5).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 6.Group 6, Certificates, non-Pell (N=10).Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median End of image description.

Image description.Award LevelHorizontal Bar chart with 6 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Bachelor's, Pell (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 61.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 62.Group 2, Associate's, Pell (N=5).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01.Group 3, Certificates, Pell (N=10).Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01.Group 4, Bachelor's, non-Pell (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 64.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 66.Group 5, Associate's, non-Pell (N=5).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01.Group 6, Certificates, non-Pell (N=10).Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median End of image description.

Image description.Award LevelHorizontal Bar chart with 6 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Bachelor's, Pell (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 50.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 52.Group 2, Associate's, Pell (N=5).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01.Group 3, Certificates, Pell (N=10).Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01.Group 4, Bachelor's, non-Pell (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 47.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 42.Group 5, Associate's, non-Pell (N=5).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 2.Group 6, Certificates, non-Pell (N=10).Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median End of image description.

Figure 33. Award rates of first-time, full-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 years of entry, by awardlevel and Pell status, 2009-10 cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Certificates, non-Pell (N=10)

Associate's, non-Pell (N=5)

Bachelor's, non-Pell (N=15)

Certificates, Pell (N=10)

Associate's, Pell (N=5)

Bachelor's, Pell (N=15)

00

2

6261

00

1

5255

Award Level

Your institution Comparison Group Median

NOTE: Award level rates are based on the highest award received after 8 years of entry.Student cohorts (i.e., First-time, full-time; First-time, part-time; Non-first-time, full-time; andNon-first-time, part-time) are degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students whoentered the institution between July 1, 2009-June 30, 2010. Pell recipients are studentswith demonstrated financial need. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N isthe number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, OutcomeMeasures component.

Figure 34. Award rates of first-time, part-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 years of entry, by awardlevel and Pell status, 2009-10 cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Certificates, non-Pell (N=10)

Associate's, non-Pell (N=5)

Bachelor's, non-Pell (N=15)

Certificates, Pell (N=10)

Associate's, Pell (N=5)

Bachelor's, Pell (N=15)

00

6

2711

00

0

2029

Award Level

Your institution Comparison Group Median

NOTE: Award level rates are based on the highest award received after 8 years of entry.Student cohorts (i.e., First-time, full-time; First-time, part-time; Non-first-time, full-time; andNon-first-time, part-time) are degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students whoentered the institute on between July 1, 2009-June 30, 2010. Pell recipients are studentswith demonstrated financial need. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N isthe number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, OutcomeMeasures component.

Figure 35. Award rates of non-first-time, full-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 years of entry, by awardlevel and Pell status, 2009-10 cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Certificates, non-Pell (N=10)

Associate's, non-Pell (N=5)

Bachelor's, non-Pell (N=15)

Certificates, Pell (N=10)

Associate's, Pell (N=5)

Bachelor's, Pell (N=15)

00

0

6664

00

0

6261

Award Level

Your institution Comparison Group Median

NOTE: Award level rates are based on the highest award received after 8 years of entry.Student cohorts (i.e., First-time, full-time; First-time, part-time; Non-first-time, full-time; andNon-first-time, part-time) are degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students whoentered the institution between July 1, 2009-June 30, 2010. Pell recipients are studentswith demonstrated financial need. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N isthe number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, OutcomeMeasures component.

Figure 36. Award rates of non-first-time, part-time,degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 yearsof entry, by award level and Pell status, 2009-10 cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Certificates, non-Pell (N=10)

Associate's, non-Pell (N=5)

Bachelor's, non-Pell (N=15)

Certificates, Pell (N=10)

Associate's, Pell (N=5)

Bachelor's, Pell (N=15)

00

2

4247

00

0

5250

Award Level

Your institution Comparison Group Median

NOTE: Award level rates are based on the highest award received after 8 years of entry.Student cohorts (i.e., First-time, full-time; First-time, part-time; Non-first-time, full-time; andNon-first-time, part-time) are degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students whoentered the institution between July 1, 2009-June 30, 2010. Pell recipients are studentswith demonstrated financial need. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N isthe number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2017-18, OutcomeMeasures component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 14

Central Connecticut State University  

Figure 37. Figure 38.

Page 15: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Revenue sourceHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent of function total.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Tuition and fees.Item 1, Your institution 38.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 35.Group 2, State appropriations.Item 1, Your institution 39.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 27.Group 3, Local appropriations.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01.Group 4, Government grants and contracts.Item 1, Your institution 9.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 15.Group 5, Private gifts, grants, and contracts.Item 1, Your institution 2.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 3.Group 6, Investment return.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 1.Group 7, Other core revenues.Item 1, Your institution 12.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 11. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Revenue sourceHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Dollars per FTE.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Tuition and fees.Item 1, Your institution $8693.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $8691.Group 2, State appropriations.Item 1, Your institution $8725.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $7881.Group 3, Local appropriations.Item 1, Your institution $0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $0.01.Group 4, Government grants and contracts.Item 1, Your institution $1993.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $3796.Group 5, Private gifts, grants, and contracts.Item 1, Your institution $423.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $1051.Group 6, Investment return.Item 1, Your institution $59.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $340.Group 7, Other core revenues.Item 1, Your institution $2711.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $2983. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Expense functionHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Instruction.Item 1, Your institution 48.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 47.Group 2, Research.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 6.Group 3, Public service.Item 1, Your institution 3.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 5.Group 4, Academic support.Item 1, Your institution 9.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 12.Group 5, Institutional support.Item 1, Your institution 15.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 11.Group 6, Student services.Item 1, Your institution 13.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 7.Group 7, Other core expenses.Item 1, Your institution 10.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 8. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Expense functionHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Dollars per FTE.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Instruction.Item 1, Your institution $12046.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $9890.Group 2, Research.Item 1, Your institution $189.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $1457.Group 3, Public service.Item 1, Your institution $761.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $1279.Group 4, Academic support.Item 1, Your institution $2328.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $2429.Group 5, Institutional support.Item 1, Your institution $3855.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $2435.Group 6, Student services.Item 1, Your institution $3306.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $1738.Group 7, Other core expenses.Item 1, Your institution $2448.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $1508. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Percent distribution of core revenues, by source: Fiscalyear 2017

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of function total

Other corerevenues

Investment return

Private gifts, grants,and contracts

Government grantsand contracts

Localappropriations

Stateappropriations

Tuition and fees

1112

10

32

159

00

2739

3538

Revenue source

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: The comparison group median is based on those members of the comparisongroup that report finance data using the same accounting standards as the comparisoninstitution. For more information, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Financecomponent.

Core revenues per FTE enrollment, by source: Fiscalyear 2017

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000

Dollars per FTE

Other corerevenues

Investment return

Private gifts, grants,and contracts

Government grantsand contracts

Localappropriations

Stateappropriations

Tuition and fees

$2,983$2,711

$340$59

$1,051$423

$3,796$1,993

$0$0

$7,881$8,725

$8,691$8,693

Revenue source

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: The comparison group median is based on those members of the comparisongroup that report finance data using the same accounting standards as the comparisoninstitution. For details on calculating FTE enrollment and a detailed definition of corerevenues, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparisongroup.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2017, 12-monthEnrollment component and Spring 2018, Finance component.

Figure 39. Percent distribution of core expenses, by function: Fiscalyear 2017

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Other coreexpenses

Student services

Institutional support

Academic support

Public service

Research

Instruction

810

713

1115

129

53

61

4748

Expense function

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: For a detailed definition of core expenses, see the Methodological Notes. N is thenumber of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Financecomponent.

Figure 40. Core expenses per FTE enrollment, by function: Fiscalyear 2017

$0 $2,500 $5,000 $7,500 $10,000 $12,500

Dollars per FTE

Other coreexpenses

Student services

Institutional support

Academic support

Public service

Research

Instruction

$1,508$2,448

$1,738$3,306

$2,435$3,855

$2,429$2,328

$1,279$761

$1,457$189

$9,890$12,046

Expense function

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Expenses per full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, particularly instruction, may beinflated because finance data includes all core expenses while FTE reflects credit activityonly. For details on calculating FTE enrollment and a detailed definition of core expenses,see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2017, 12-monthEnrollment component and Spring 2018, Finance component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 15

Central Connecticut State University  

Figure 41. Figure 42.

Page 16: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Horizontal Bar chart with 2 items.X scale titled Dollars per FTE.Y scale titled Scale label.Item 1, Your institution $6786.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) $8325. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Expense functionHorizontal Bar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent of total expenses.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Total core expenses (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 42.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 48.Group 2, Instruction (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 52.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 57.Group 3, Research (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 32.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 43.Group 4, Public service (N=14).Item 1, Your institution 37.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 43.Group 5, Academic support (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 38.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 48.Group 6, Student services (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 46.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 49.Group 7, Institutional support (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 42.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 46.Group 8, Other core functions (N=15).Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median End of image description.

Image description.Staff categoryHorizontal Bar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of staff.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Postsecondary Teachers and staff.Item 1, Your institution 610.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 847.Group 2, Instructional support occupations.Item 1, Your institution 119.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 139.Group 3, Management.Item 1, Your institution 40.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 177.Group 4, Business and financial operations.Item 1, Your institution 45.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 171.Group 5, Computer, engineering, and science.Item 1, Your institution 41.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 183.Group 6, Community service, legal, arts, and media.Item 1, Your institution 51.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 208.Group 7, Healthcare.Item 1, Your institution 6.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 23.Group 8, Other.Item 1, Your institution 244.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 532. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Academic rankHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Average salary.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, All ranks (N=15).Item 1, Your institution $80864.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $80809.Group 2, Professor (N=15).Item 1, Your institution $95207.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $105880.Group 3, Associate professor (N=15).Item 1, Your institution $77285.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $83226.Group 4, Assistant professor (N=15).Item 1, Your institution $62233.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $74550.Group 5, Instructor (N=11).Item 1, Your institution $53481.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $52422.Group 6, Lecturer (N=11).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $61010.Group 7, No academic rank (N=9).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $63399. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median End of image description.

Endowment assets (year end) per FTE enrollment: Fiscalyear 2017

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000

Dollars per FTE

Endowment per FTE

$8,325

$6,786

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: For more information on the comparison group median, see the MethodologicalNotes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2017, 12-monthEnrollment component and Spring 2018, Finance component.

Expenses for salaries and wages as a percent of totalexpenses, by function: Fiscal year 2017

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of total expenses

Other core functions (N=15)

Institutional support (N=15)

Student services (N=15)

Academic support (N=15)

Public service (N=14)

Research (N=15)

Instruction (N=15)

Total core expenses (N=15)

00

4642

4946

4838

4337

4332

5752

4842

Expense function

Your institution Comparison Group Median

NOTE: The comparison group median is based on those members of the comparisongroup that report finance data using the same accounting standards as the comparisoninstitution. For more information, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Financecomponent.

Figure 43. Full-time equivalent staff, by occupational category: Fall2017

0 200 400 600 800 1,000

Number of staff

Other

Healthcare

Community service, legal,arts, and media

Computer, engineering,and science

Business and financialoperations

Management

Instructional supportoccupations

Postsecondary Teachersand staff

532244

236

20851

18341

17145

17740

139119

847610

Staff category

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Graduate assistants are not included. For calculation details, see theMethodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, HumanResources component.

Figure 44. Average salaries of full-time instructional non-medicalstaff equated to 9-months worked, by academic rank:Academic year 2017-18

$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000

Average salary

No academic rank (N=9)

Lecturer (N=11)

Instructor (N=11)

Assistant professor (N=15)

Associate professor (N=15)

Professor (N=15)

All ranks (N=15)

$63,399

$61,010

$52,422$53,481

$74,550$62,233

$83,226$77,285

$105,880$95,207

$80,809$80,864

Academic rank

Your institution Comparison Group Median

NOTE: See Methodology Notes for more details on average salary. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, HumanResources component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 16

Central Connecticut State University  

Figure 45. Student-to-faculty ratio: Fall 2017 Figure 46.

Page 17: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Image description.Horizontal Bar chart with 2 items.X scale titled FTE students per FTE instructional staff.Y scale titled Scale label.Item 1, Your institution 16.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 18. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.Material typeHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent of library collection.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Physical books.Item 1, Your institution 61.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 46.Group 2, Digital/Electronic books.Item 1, Your institution 24.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 24.Group 3, Physical media.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 5.Group 4, Digital/Electronic media.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 1.Group 5, Physical serials.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 1.Group 6, Digital/Electronic serials.Item 1, Your institution 12.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 6.Group 7, Databases.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

Image description.FunctionHorizontal Bar chart with 6 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent of library expenses.Y scale titled Scale label.Group 1, Salaries and wages.Item 1, Your institution 36.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 42.Group 2, Fringe benefits.Item 1, Your institution 29.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 10.Group 3, One-time purchases.Item 1, Your institution 4.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 3.Group 4, Ongoing commitments to subscriptions.Item 1, Your institution 28.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 33.Group 5, Other materials/services.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 0.01.Group 6, Operations and maintenance.Item 1, Your institution 2.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=15) 10. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=15) End of image description.

0 5 10 15 20

FTE students per FTE instructional staff

Student-to-facultyratio

18

16

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: Student-to-faculty ratio data are presented only for institutions that haveundergraduate students; graduate only institutions are not included. For details, see theMethodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, Fall Enrollmentcomponent.

Percent distribution of library collection, by materialtype: Fiscal Year 2017

0 20 40 60 80

Percent of library collection

Databases

Digital/Electronic serials

Physical serials

Digital/Electronic media

Physical media

Digital/Electronic books

Physical books

00

612

11

10

51

2424

4661

Material type

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, AcademicLibraries component.

Figure 47. Percent distribution of library expenses, by function:Fiscal Year 2017

0 10 20 30 40 50

Percent of library expenses

Operations and maintenance

Other materials/services

Ongoing commitments to subscriptions

One-time purchases

Fringe benefits

Salaries and wages

102

01

3328

34

1029

4236

Function

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=15)

NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2018, AcademicLibraries component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 17

Central Connecticut State University  

METHODOLOGICAL NOTES

Page 18: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Overview

This report is based on data supplied by institutions to IPEDS during 2017-18 data collection year. Response rates exceeded 99% for mostsurveys. IPEDS First Look reports at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010 provide some information on aggregateinstitutional responses.

Use of Median Values for Comparison Group

This report compares your institution’s data to the median value for the comparison group for each statistic shown in the figure. If more thanone statistic is present in a figure, the median values are determined separately for each indicator or statistic. Medians are not displayed forcomparison groups with fewer than three values. Where percentage distributions are presented, median values may not add to 100%. Toaccess all the data used to create the figures included in this report, go to ‘Use the Data’ portal on the IPEDS website at this provided link(http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds).

Missing Statistics

If a statistic is not reported for your institution, the omission indicates that the statistic is not relevant to your institution and the data were notcollected. Not all notes may be applicable to your report.

Use of Imputed Data

All IPEDS data are subject to imputation for total (institutional) and partial (item) nonresponse. If necessary, imputed values were used toprepare your report.

Data Confidentiality

IPEDS data are not collected under a pledge of confidentiality.

Disaggregation of Data by Race/Ethnicity

When applicable, some statistics are disaggregated by race/ethnicity. Data disaggregated by race/ethnicity have been reported using the1997 Office of Management and Budget categories. Detailed information about the race/ethnicity categories can be found athttps://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/Section/Resources.

Cohort Determination for Reporting Student Financial Aid, Graduation Rates, and Outcome Measures

Student cohorts for reporting Student Financial Aid and Graduation Rates data are based on the reporting type of the institution. Forinstitutions that report based on an academic year (those operating on standard academic terms), student counts and cohorts are based onfall term data. Student counts and cohorts for program reporters (those that do not operate on standard academic terms) are based onunduplicated counts of students enrolled during a full 12-month period.

Student cohorts for reporting Outcome Measures are based on a full-year cohort from July 1-June 30 for all degree-granting institutions.

DESCRIPTION OF STATISTICS USED IN THE FIGURES

Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools)

Admissions and Test Score Data

Admissions and test score data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open admission policy, and apply to first-time,degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students only. Applicants include only those students who fulfilled all requirements for considerationfor admission and who were notified of one of the following actions: admission, non-admission, placement on a wait list, or applicationwithdrawn (by applicant or institution). Admitted applicants (admissions) include wait-listed students who were subsequently offeredadmission. Early decision, early action, and students who began studies during the summer prior to the fall reporting period are included. Forcustomized Data Feedback Reports, test scores are presented only if scores are required for admission.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 18

Central Connecticut State University  

Student Enrollment

Page 19: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

FTE Enrollment

The full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment used in this report is the sum of the institution’s FTE undergraduate enrollment and FTE graduateenrollment (as calculated from or reported on the 12-month Enrollment component). Undergraduate and graduate FTE are estimated using12-month instructional activity (credit and/or contact hours). See “Calculation of FTE Students (using instructional activity)” in the IPEDSGlossary at https://surveys.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/VisGlossaryAll.aspx.

Total Entering Undergraduate Students

Total entering students are students at the undergraduate level, both full- and part-time, new to the institution in the fall term (or the priorsummer term who returned in the fall). This includes all first-time undergraduate students, students transferring into the institution at theundergraduate level, and non-degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates entering in the fall. Only degree-granting, academic year reportinginstitutions provide total entering student data.

Charges and Net Price

Average Institutional Net Price

Average net price is calculated for full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates who were awarded grant or scholarship aidfrom the federal government, state/local government, or the institution anytime during the full aid year. For public institutions, this includesonly students who paid the in-state or in-district tuition rate. Other sources of grant aid are excluded. Average net price is generated bysubtracting the average amount of federal, state/local government, and institutional grant and scholarship aid from the total cost ofattendance. Total cost of attendance is the sum of published tuition and required fees, books and supplies, and the average room and boardand other expenses.

For the purpose of the IPEDS reporting, aid awarded refers to financial aid that was awarded to, and accepted by, a student. This amountmay differ from the aid amount that is disbursed to a student.

Military Benefits

Military Benefits

IPEDS collects data on two military educational benefit programs – Post 9/11 GI Bill and Tuition Assistance.

The Post 9/11 GI Bill is a federal education benefit for veterans, who served on active duty after September 1, 2001. This benefit provides upto 36 months of education benefits for the following college costs: tuition and fees, books and supplies and housing. The tuition and feesbenefit payment is made directly to the postsecondary institution; whereas, payments for books, supplies, and housing are sent to the student.

The Tuition Assistance Program covers the tuition and course-specific fees of active, eligible service members. The benefit is directly paid tothe institution by the service member’s Armed service.

Retention, Graduation Rates, and Outcome Measures

Retention Rates

Retention rates are measures at which students persist in their educational program at an institution, expressed as a percentage. For four-year institutions, this is the percentage of first-time bachelors (or equivalent) degree-seeking undergraduates from the previous fall who areagain enrolled in the current fall. For all other institutions this is the percentage of first-time degree/certificate-seeking students from theprevious fall who either re-enrolled or successfully completed their program by the current fall. The full-time retention rate is calculated usingthe percentage of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates, while the part-time rate is calculated using the percentage ofpart-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates.

Graduation Rates and Transfer-out Rate

Graduation rates are those developed to satisfy the requirements of the Student Right-to-Know Act and Higher Education Act, as amended,and are defined as the total number of individuals from a given cohort of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates whocompleted a degree or certificate within a given percent of normal time to complete all requirements of the degree or certificate program;

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 19

Central Connecticut State University  

Page 20: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

divided by the total number of students in the cohort of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates minus any allowableexclusions. Institutions are permitted to exclude from the cohort students who died or were totally and permanently disabled; those who leftschool to serve in the armed forces or were called up to active duty; those who left to serve with a foreign aid service of the federalgovernment, such as the Peace Corps; and those who left to serve on an official church mission.

A further extension of the traditional Graduation Rates (GR) component which carries forward 100% and 150% graduation rates datapreviously reported in the GR component is the Graduation Rates 200% (GR200) component, which request information on any additionalcompleters and exclusions from the cohort between 151% and 200% normal time for students to complete all requirements of their program ofstudy.

Transfer-out rate is the total number of students from the cohort who are known to have transferred out of the reporting institution (withoutearning a degree/award) and subsequently re-enrolled at another institution within the same time period; divided by the same adjusted cohort(initial cohort minus allowable exclusions) as described above. Only institutions with a mission that includes providing substantial preparationfor students to enroll in another eligible institution are required to report transfers out.

Outcome Measures Data

Alternative measures of student success are reported by degree-granting institutions to describe the outcomes of four degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate student groups: Full-time, first-time (FTFT); Part-time, first-time (PTFT); Full-time, non-first-time (FTNFT); and Part-time, non-first-time (PTNFT). Additionally, each of the four cohorts collects data on two subcohorts: Pell grant recipients and non-Pell grantrecipients. These measures provide the 4-year, 6-year, and 8-year award rates (or completions rates) after entering an institution. NCEScalculates award rates by dividing a cohort’s or subcohort’s adjusted cohort into the number of total awards at 4-year, 6-year, and 8-yearstatus points.

The initial cohort can be revised and take allowable exclusions resulting in an adjusted cohort. Institutions are permitted to exclude from theinitial cohort the following: 1) students who died or were totally and permanently disabled; 2) those who left school to serve in the armedforces or were called up to active duty; 3) those who left to serve with a foreign aid service of the federal government, such as the PeaceCorps; and 4) those who left to serve on an office church mission.

The highest award and the type of award (i.e., certificate, Associate’s, or Bachelor’s) are reported at each status point. For students who didnot earn an undergraduate award after 8-years of entry, the enrollment statuses are reported as either still enrolled at the institution, orsubsequently transferred out of the institution. Unlike the Graduation Rates data, all institutions must report on a full-year cohort (studentsentering July 1 of one year to June 30 to the next) and on their transfer out students, regardless if the institution has a mission that providessubstantial transfer preparation.

Finance

Core Revenues

Core revenues for public institutions reporting under GASB standards include tuition and fees; government (federal, state, and local)appropriations and operating and nonoperating grants/contracts; private gifts, grants, and contracts (private operating grants/contracts plusgifts and contributions from affiliated entities); sales and services of educational activities; investment income; other operating andnonoperating sources; and other revenues and additions (capital appropriations and grants and additions to permanent endowments). “Othercore revenues” include federal appropriations, sales and services of educational activities, other operating and nonoperating sources, andother revenues and additions.

Core revenues for private, not-for-profit institutions (and a small number of public institutions) reporting under FASB standards include tuitionand fees; government (federal, state, and local) appropriations and grants/contracts; private gifts, grants/contracts (including contributionsfrom affiliated entities); investment return; sales and services of educational activities; and other sources (a generated category of totalrevenues minus the sum of core and noncore categories on the Finance component). “Other core revenues” include government (federal,state, and local) appropriations, sales and services of educational activities, and other sources.

Core revenues for private, for-profit institutions reporting under FASB standards include tuition and fees; government (federal, state, andlocal) appropriations and grants/contracts; private grants/ contracts; investment income; sales and services of educational activities; and othersources (a generated category of total revenues minus the sum of core and noncore categories on the Finance component). “Other corerevenues” include government (federal, state, and local) appropriations and other sources.

At degree-granting institutions, core revenues exclude revenues from auxiliary enterprises (e.g., bookstores and dormitories), hospitals, andindependent operations. Non-degree-granting institutions do no report revenue from auxiliary enterprises in a separate category, and thusmay include these amounts in the core revenues from other sources.

Core Expenses

Core expenses include expenses for instruction, research, public service, academic support, institutional support, student services, grantaid/scholarships and fellowships (net of discounts and allowances), and other functional expenses (a generated category of total expense

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 20

Central Connecticut State University  

Page 21: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

minus the sum of core and noncore functions on the Finance component). Expenses for operation and maintenance of plant, depreciation,and interest are allocated to each of the other functions. Core expenses at degree-granting institutions exclude expenses for auxiliaryenterprises (e.g., bookstores and dormitories), hospitals, and independent operations. Non-degree-granting institutions do not reportexpenses for auxiliary enterprises in a separate category and thus may include these amounts in the core expenses as other expenses.“Other core expenses” is the sum of grant aid/scholarships and fellowships and other expenses.

Endowment Assets

Endowment assets, for public institutions under GASB standards, and private, not-for-profit institutions under FASB standards, include grossinvestments of endowment funds, term endowment funds, and funds functioning as endowment for the institution and any of its foundationsand other affiliated organizations. Private, for-profit institutions under FASB do not hold or report endowment assets.

Salaries and Wages

Salaries and wages for public institutions under GASB standards and private (not-for-profit and for-profit) institutions under FASB standards,include amounts paid as compensation for services to all employees regardless of the duration of service, and amounts made to or on behalfof an individual over and above that received in the form of a salary or wage.

Staff

FTE Staff

The full-time-equivalent (FTE) by occupational category is calculated by summing the total number of full-time staff and adding one-third ofthe total number of part-time staff. Graduate assistants are not included.

Equated Instructional Non-Medical Staff Salaries

Institutions reported the number of full-time nonmedical instructional staff and their salary outlays by academic rank, gender, and the numberof months worked (9-, 10-, 11-, and 12-months). Salary outlays for staff who worked 10-, 11-, and 12-months were equated to 9-months ofwork by multiplying the outlays reported for 10-months by 0.90, the outlays reported for 11 months by 0.818, and the outlays reported for 12-months by 0.75. The equated 10-, 11-, and 12-outlays were then added to the outlays for instructional staff that worked 9-months to generatea total 9-month equated salary outlay. The total 9-month equated outlay was then divided by total number of instructional non-medical staff todetermine an equated 9-month average salary. This calculation was done for each academic rank. Salary outlays were not reported for staffthat work less than 9-months and were excluded.

Student-to-Faculty Ratio

Institutions can provide their institution’s student-to-faculty ratio (i.e., student-to-instructional staff) for undergraduate programs or follow theNCES guidance in calculating their student-to-faculty ratio, which is as follows: the number of FTE students (using Fall Enrollment surveydata) divided by total FTE instructional staff (using the total Primarily instruction + Instruction/research/public service staff reported in HumanResources component and adding any not primarily instructional staff that are teaching a credit course). For this calculation, FTE for studentsis equal to the number of the full-time students plus one-third the number of part-time students; FTE for instructional staff is similarlycalculated. Students in "stand-alone" graduate or professional programs (such as, medicine, law, veterinary, dentistry, social work, or publichealth) and instructional staff teaching in these programs are excluded from the FTE calculations.

Libraries

Library Collections

Collections comprise of documents held locally and remote resources for which permanent or temporary access rights have been acquired.Degree-granting institutions with total library expenditures greater than zero and/or had access to a library collection reported their physicalbooks, media, and serials collections and their digital/electronic books, media, serials and database collections.

Digital/electronic books and media are reported by titles owned or leased by the library if individual titles are cataloged and/or searchablethrough the library catalog or discovery system. E-serials are reported by titles that are accessible through the library’s catalog or discoverysystem. Digital and Electronic databases are reported by the total number of licensed digital/electronic databases in the institutions collectionif there is bibliographic or discovery access at the database level.

Counts in each category (i.e., physical books, media, and serials as well as digital/electronic books, media, serials, and databases) are thenumber of held at the end of the most recent fiscal year. The percent distribution of each resource is derived by dividing the counts in eachcategory by the total of all categories.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 21

Central Connecticut State University  

Page 22: Image description. Cover Image End of image description ...docs.ccsu.edu/.../IPEDS/...Aspirational_Group_2018.pdf · Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting

Library Expenditures

Library expenditures are funds expended by the library (regardless of when received) from its regular budget and from all other sources,reported for the most recent fiscal year. Salaries and wages are reported from the library budget or all other institutional sources that areidentifiable. Fringe benefits are reported only if paid from the library budget. Degree-granting institutions with total library expenditures lessthan $100,000 were not required to report their expenditures to IPEDS. The percent distribution of each category of expense is derived bydividing each expense category by the sum of total library expenditure.

Additional Methodological Information

Additional methodological information on the IPEDS components can be found in the publications available athttp://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010.

Additional definitions of variables used in this report can be found in the IPEDS online glossary available at this provided linkhttps://surveys.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/VisGlossaryAll.aspx.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 22