ILO technical assistance in a least developed country ... · ILO technical assistance in a least...
-
Upload
vuongthuan -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of ILO technical assistance in a least developed country ... · ILO technical assistance in a least...
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
1.
ILO technical assistance in a least developed country context: the making of
labour law for the Lesotho labour market
Debbie Collier and Shane Godfrey, University of Cape Town
‘Decent work for a fair globalization requires the ILO’s technical cooperation arm to work with its
constituents to move beyond mere paper references to international labour standards …’1
1. Introduction and background to the paper .................................................................................... 2
2. The ILO as (1) a provider of technical assistance; and (2) a development agency ......................... 5
3. The labour market, and development challenges in Lesotho ........................................................ 7
3.1 Broad overview of challenges ................................................................................................. 7
3.2 Policy response to direct development in Lesotho ................................................................. 9
3.3 Towards a labour market policy............................................................................................ 11
4. Lesotho’s Labour Law Reform Project and the ILO’s technical assistance ................................... 12
4.1 Background information ....................................................................................................... 12
4.2 Areas of law identified for reform ........................................................................................ 13
4.2.1 The proposed broad direction for labour market policy .............................................. 15
4.2.2 Revising the scope of protection provided by the Labour Code ................................... 18
4.2.3 Introducing flexibility into labour standards ................................................................. 21
5 Summary and conclusion .............................................................................................................. 22
5.1 The significant challenges in labour law reform in a least developed country context ....... 22
5.2 Suggestions on facilitating development in a labour law reform context ............................ 22
5.3 Concluding remarks .............................................................................................................. 23
Bibliography .......................................................................................................................................... 24
1 Adele Blackett ‘Beyond standard setting; a study of ILO technical cooperation on regional labour law reform in West and Central Africa’ (2010‐2011) (32) Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 443‐492 at 491.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
2.
1. Introductionandbackgroundtothepaper
The Kingdom of Lesotho, a constitutional monarchy, gained independence from Britain in 1966. High
levels of poverty, poor indicators of human resources (measuring education and health) and a high
degree of economic vulnerability mean that Lesotho remains on the UN list as a Least Developed
Country (LDC). Lesotho is economically integrated with, and geographically surrounded by, South
Africa and is vulnerable to regional dynamics: for many years Lesotho’s economy grew largely on the
basis of remittances from South African mines and a disproportionate share of revenue from the
Southern African Customs Union (SACU). However, recent developments in the region have chiselled
away at these sources of income.
Instability in Lesotho is not limited to its economic context: since gaining independence, there have
been four military coups ď état that have involved changes of government and two attempted
coups.2 The most recent illustration of political instability in Lesotho is provided by the events
following the June 2014 change in political allegiance within the ruling coalition government.
Lesotho’s government is formed on a constitutional requirement of a simple majority (50% + 1) of
the seats in parliament; and after the 2012 elections a coalition of three parties3 was necessary to
secure a mere one‐seat majority.4 The coalition held 61 out of 120 seats in the National Assembly,5
and in June 2014 one of three parties (the LDC) entered into an alliance with a significant minority
party.6 This resulted in the prime minister exercising his authority to prorogate Parliament in June
2014, amid fears of a coup; which was followed by an attempted coup, allegedly staged by the
Lesotho Defence Force in August 2014 and, facilitated through SADC mediation, early elections in
February 2015. Caution has been expressed regarding the new administration: for the ISS ‘it is
unlikely that the outcome of the election – a coalition led by the Democratic Congress – will solve
the cyclical and structural shortcomings of the country’s politics. Parties split and splinter; violence
breaks out both before and after polls; consensus is non‐existent, even among coalition partners,
and manoeuvring for position trumps governing for the good of the country.’7
In so far as its labour market is concerned, Lesotho has a small, relatively unskilled, workforce (of
around 608 327 people) and is characterised by high levels of unemployment and informal work;
much of it in subsistence agriculture. It is reported that, in 2008, almost 72% of the employed
population was informally employed: of these, 51% in so‐called formal enterprises and 49% in the
informal sector. Potential generators of growth include expanded diamond mining and major water
projects and, in manufacturing, in the (foreign‐owned) clothing and textile sector, which is
dependent on AGOA trade‐preferences.
Lesotho’s development needs are complex and the prevailing development strategies prioritise
‘deeper investment climate reforms’ and the Lesotho Decent Work Country Programmes (DWCPs)
2 See Dimpho Motsamai, Southern Africa Report : Elections in a time of instability – Challenges for Lesotho beyond the 2015 poll (April 2015) Issue 3, Institute for Security Studies for historical details in this regard. 3 The All Basotho Convention (ABC), Lesotho Congress for Democracy (LCD) and Basotho National Party (BNP). 4 Motsamai (note 2) at p. 5. The ISS comments that ‘[t]he coalition faced the challenge of governing with a one‐seat majority. It was difficult to pass legislation requiring a two‐thirds majority, as they would need to lobby the opposition for at least 19 votes.’ 5 Motsamai (note 2) at p. 5. 6 The Democratic Congress (DC). 7 Motsamai (note 2) at p. 1.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
3.
flesh out areas of priority in labour market regulation, which are discussed in the text below. Lesotho
has ratified 23 ILO Conventions, including all eight fundamental conventions dealing with core rights
at work, and over the years the ILO has provided critical support to the constituents in Lesotho to
facilitate the development of labour market regulation consistent with ratified conventions.
In 2013 the ILO Decent Work Country Team (Eastern & Southern Africa) was approached by the
Minister of Labour and Employment in Lesotho (MOLE) for assistance with a labour law review
process which had stalled in 2006, resulting in the failure to present a draft amendment bill to
parliament. In response the ILO, in 2014, facilitated numerous labour law reform initiatives which we
were privileged to be involved in. These include consultations with constituents, the drafting of an
issues paper, and stakeholder workshops around key areas of concern. While there is some
evidence of ongoing work on law reform in Lesotho, the process was somewhat stalled by political
developments in the country. In light of this, our paper is perhaps a little premature as further ILO
engagement and reform developments are likely to materialise in the near future, and therefore our
assessment in this paper should be viewed accordingly: as a limited account of our experience to
date in the law making process in Lesotho.
There are a number of factors that stood out for us as potential barriers or constraints to the
adoption of pro‐development labour law reform in Lesotho – we have categorised these as (1)
stakeholder resource and capacity constraints; (2) the host country political and policy context; (3) a
‘one‐size‐fits‐all’ (or ‘once‐off’) approach to labour standards; and (4) the negotiated boundaries for
external consultants. The first two of these constraints are internal to Lesotho, the host country, and
the third and fourth are external in the sense that they are constraints which attach to the ILO as a
provider of technical assistance and as a development agency together with its external consultants.
These constraints are not peculiar to the process in Lesotho and similar observations are evident in
prior literature on ILO technical assistance.8
The host country political and policy context and the stakeholder resource and capacity constraints9
in a developing country context are significant: in Lesotho this includes, politically, a fragile
government which resulted in the attempted coup in 2014 followed by the dissolving of parliament
and early elections. Political will and commitment to reform still remain a concern,10 alongside an
abundance of policies intended to promote development in Lesotho, but which, in some respects
lack coherence, and have yet to gain any real traction. Resource and capacity constraints are those
which one could typically anticipate in a developing country context, and relate not only to state
8 See for example Adele Blackett ‘Beyond standard setting; a study of ILO technical cooperation on regional labour law reform in West and Central Africa’ (2010‐2011) (32) Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 443‐492 and Arturo Bronstein ‘The role of the International Labour Office in the framing of national labor law’ (2004‐2005) (26) Comparative Labor law & Policy Journal 339‐369. 9 In a report on the ILO’s Improving Labour Systems in Southern Africa (ILSSA) project implemented in six SADC countries, including Lesotho, the authors indicate that “[a]ll social partners suffer from major continuing deficits in capacity. These include lack of equipment, inability to secure and/or to provide financial support (especially in the case of governments), and low levels of membership and funding for employer and worker organisations.” Centre for Employment & Labour Relations Law, University of Melbourne, Mid‐term Evaluation: Final Report October 2006, p. 4. Available at http://www.dol.gov/ilab/projects/summaries/MIDTERM%20EVALUATION%20FINAL%20REPORT.pdf (accessed 6 May 2015). 10 Motsamai (note 2) at p. 1 note that ‘it will take political commitment, currently lacking, to set Lesotho on a sustainable political and developmental path.’
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
4.
capacity but also to general deficiencies around trying to ‘ensure meaningful participation by
empowered tripartite actors’.11 Lack of political will, within the upper echelons of government, in
addition to instability, presents a challenge to progressive labour law reform.12
Outside of the host country, and within the context of the ILO’s technical assistance, we found it a
challenge to conceptualise ways of accommodating Lesotho’s unique development needs within,
what we would, somewhat tentatively, call a ’one‐size‐fits‐all’ / ‘once‐off’ approach to labour
standards.13 We felt some dissonance between labour standards and development needs, where,
paradoxically, the rigid adherence to standards may, in our view, have the result of undermining
human development. Labour reform efforts, we believe, should navigate carefully to a space in
which the adoption of labour standards does not compromise national development.14
As part of its technical assistance programmes the ILO engages the services of external consultants
and, in relation to our experiences in Lesotho, the negotiated boundaries for external consultants
present opportunities for further reflection. External consultants, as it has been noted, come with
their own bias and knowledge and expertise in the dynamics of a particular labour market and
should ideally work closely with one or two counterparts from the host country to ensure
11 Blackett (n 8) 477. In this regard, the Lesotho Decent Work Country Programme Phase II (2012 to 2017), at p. 21, identifies some of the challenges in the implementation of the first phase of the Lesotho DWCP, which would impact also on law reform efforts, as being ‘the lack of an organizational arrangement or structure [which] negatively impacted on effective implementation and monitoring of the country programme, … Lack of ownership of the DWCP because of what was perceived as an ineffective consultation process, … [and] [t]he need for training for national partners … and [r]esource mobilization.’ 12 Our experience is that there is commitment to reform within the Ministry of Labour and Employment. 13 In terms of a ‘once‐off’ approach to labour standards: developing countries may ratify Conventions and formalise a high level of standards which, given the state of development within the country, the standard is unattainable (although progressively realisable) and is more aspirational than realistically achievable. High levels of non‐compliance (and uncertainty) therefore result. Perhaps related to this is what Bronstein calls an ILO‐labelled opinion, which indicates that the ILO will revised a consultant’s opinion in order that the advice is consistent with the ILO approach to labour law. Bronstein, Arturo ‘The role of the International Labour Office in the framing of national labor law’ (2004‐2005) (26) Comp. Lab. L. & Pol’y 339 – 369 at p. 359. 14 Lesotho, like all least development countries, has a wide range of development needs and faces many constraints in how it meets these needs. This requires, on the one hand, a requirement to prioritise some needs, and on the other hand, it means a complex balancing of demands and interests. In Lesotho, however, underpinning all the development challenges is one core problem: the economy is not creating enough jobs. The difficult transition the economy is making and the threats it faces is seeing large numbers of people being dislodged from subsistence agriculture into the labour market, but without many of these people being taken up into employment in the very slowly expanding manufacturing and service sectors. The result is persistent high unemployment and growing informality. Given the scale of this problem and its deep structural nature one clearly cannot rely solely on economic growth for the solution. While there must be growth, and if possible increased growth, there must also be significant job creation and redistribution of the wealth being generated. One way the latter can be achieved is to ensure that jobs are ‘decent’. Labour regulation can appear to make jobs decent by providing a set of appropriate standards, but unless all employers are compliant and all jobs are regulated then in reality the jobs will not be ‘decent’. This scenario leaves it all to enforcement to ensure rising compliance. An alternative approach is to see the setting of labour standards as a process that will involve a ratcheting up of the standards as growth takes place, effectively balancing and integrating the creation of jobs with the quality of jobs. Such an approach arguably allows for better complementarity between labour market regulation and other aspects of development policy, which acknowledges that regulated employment is both a means and an end. The problem with this approach is that it takes a bet on the politics of the country, i.e. that governments will over time ensure that standards are ratcheted up as growth takes place.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
5.
meaningful engagement in the host country.15 On reflection, this is an area which may have been
improved upon. An interesting dynamic in the Lesotho law reform process is that it was made clear,
early on in the project, that the drafting of the legislation would be done by an internal drafter and
not by the consultant and that the consultant’s role would be limited to the drafting of an Issues
Paper and a technical memorandum to the new draft legislation. Within this context, we stressed
the need for national ownership of the law reform project (a message which was repeated
throughout the consultation process and at the national workshop to discuss the Issues Paper). A
tripartite national task team took ownership of the process and we are in communication with this
task team; as consultants we reiterated our role being to provide technical expertise, primarily from
a regional perspective, on the areas identified for reform.
Our discussions around these four ‘constraints’ of the law making process in Lesotho are
incorporated into the three main parts of our paper. In the first part, by way of background to ILO
engagement in member states’ regulatory processes, we describe the role of the ILO as a provider of
technical assistance and as a development agency. In the second part we provide an overview of the
labour market, economic context and social challenges in Lesotho which provides content to the
development context in Lesotho; and in the final part we provide some analysis of Lesotho’s recent
labour law reform project and both our and the ILO’s technical assistance in the project. The paper
concludes with some tentative remarks for pro‐development technical assistance in the developing
country context.
2. TheILOas(1)aprovideroftechnicalassistance;and(2)adevelopmentagency
As Bronstein points out, providing assistance to member states is an ILO obligation enshrined in the
Constitution.16 Article 10(2)(b) of the ILO Constitution, adopted by the Peace Conference in April
1919, reads as follows:
Subject to such directions as the Governing Body may give, the [International Labour Office] shall … (b) accord to
governments at their request all appropriate assistance within its power in connection with the framing of laws
and regulations on the basis of the decisions of the Conference and the improvement of administrative practices
and systems of inspection …
Bronstein provides an account of the first ever technical cooperation ‘mission’ carried out by the ILO
in 1936,17 but goes on to indicate that ‘the ILO technical cooperation program with regard to the
framing of labor law in member States actually took off after the end of World War II. … ILO
involvement in the elaboration of the labor law in member States was closely linked to the
decolonization process, which started in Asia soon after the end of WWII and in Africa since the
1950s, but more especially in the 1960s’.18
15 See Bronstein (n 13). 16 Bronstein, Arturo ‘The role of the International Labour Office in the framing of national labor law’ (2004‐2005) (26) Comp. Lab. L. & Pol’y 339 – 369 at 339. 17 The first request for assistance came in 1936 from Venezuela, a country recovering from the dictatorship of General Gómez, seeking to modernise its institutions and which sought ILO assistance to review of its labour law. Bronstein (note 16) at p. 340. 18 Bronstein supra.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
6.
It is estimated that, on average, ‘the Office receives some thirty requests per year, bearing on
questions relating to labor law. … in many cases they call for the Office undertaking comprehensive
assessment of existing law, or if the case may be, in‐depth study of draft legislation that a member is
considering to adopt.’19 In terms of the internal process: ‘teamwork is a well‐established practice in
the Office. … [and] a legislative opinion required by a member … normally has been based on
contributions provided by different technical units in the various fields for which the Office has
competence.’20
Bronstein is alive to the local context of members and suggests that advice from the Office, if it
merely amounts to an assessment of compliance with an ILO Convention will be of ‘short range’21 as
it will not address implementation, and he goes on to state that ‘[t]o really be useful in such cases,
the Office should propose texts adapted to national realities, which would provide the measures
enabling a member to implement a convention it has ratified or plans to ratify.’22 The goal of the
Office is to propose draft legislation ‘that would be adapted to the country’s social, economic,
political and cultural environment, even if it does not meet the expectations of everybody’.23
There are a number of methods utilised by the Office in providing technical assistance, including
commenting on draft legislation that has been prepared by the host country; the sending of ILO
officials to the host country, if requested by the host country, to present and discuss these
comments and proposal;24 and another method, where there is limited local expertise, is to send an
external consultant to work with a national counterpart in the drafting process. In the case of the
latter, what might arise is the situation where the consultant’s opinion differs from that of the
Office.25 Where this is the case, and the consultant has not provided an ‘ILO‐labelled opinion’, the
Office would revise the consultant’s text.26 Where a consultant is used, it is also important that a
good working relationship be established between the consultant and a counterpart27 or
counterparts in the host country – Bronstein talks about the importance of generating the host
counterpart’s ownership in the labour law reform28 – something which we took seriously and
thought was important in the Lesotho context, particularly in light of our assessment of the reasons
why the Amendment Bill of 2006 had not been presented to Parliament.
While the ILO’s main concern for many years was standard setting, it has always to some extent
played a role as a development agency and, according to Standing, this function increased in
importance during the 1960s.29 This is arguably reflected in its concern with ‘basic needs’ and with
19 Bronstein (note 16) at p. 343. 20 Bronstein (note 16) at p. 345. 21 Bronstein (note 16) at p. 351. 22 Bronstein (note 16) at p. 352. 23 Bronstein (note 16) at p. 356. 24 Interestingly, Bronstein talks about proposals at this stage being withdrawn if it becomes clear that implementation would run into difficulties or ‘lead to surrealistic laws, more adapted to give pleasure to international experts and bureaucrats than to render service to their true recipients.’ Bronstein (note 16) at p. 358. 25 Bronstein (note 16) at p. 359. 26 Bronstein (note 16) at p. 359. 27 In English speaking countries such as Lesotho, Bronstein suggests the Labour Commission or his or her deputy as the host country counterpart. 28 Supra. 29 Standing, Guy ‘The ILO: An Agency for Globalisation?’ (2008) 39 Development and Change 355 – 384 at 359.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
7.
the ‘informal sector’ that emerged late in that decade. At the same time the ILO expanded its
function in respect of technical cooperation. In the 1990s the concern within the ILO with
development picked up with the decentralisation of its structure by creating regional multi‐
disciplinary teams in a range of developing countries. The growing interest in development was
recognised in the decent work concept, launched in 1999, which was an attempt by the ILO to
reposition itself vis a vis the Washington Consensus institutions. While many have complained of the
‘vagueness’ of the concept, it is precisely this quality which arguably allows a certain flexibility with
regard to how standards are prioritised and introduced in developing countries. It is no surprise
therefore that Decent Work Country Programmes have been introduced exclusively in developing
countries and the transition economies of eastern Europe.30
The sections below consist firstly, of a discussion of the development context and labour market of
Lesotho and thereafter a more detailed account of the law reform process currently underway in
Lesotho.
3. Thelabourmarket,anddevelopmentchallengesinLesotho
3.1 Broadoverviewofchallenges
Lesotho is a small, poor, least‐developed country in Southern Africa with an open economy. The
economy has grown steadily over the last 30 years ‐ the average real GDP growth rate for the period
from 1982/3 to 2010/11 was 4% ‐ but it is currently undergoing restructuring and faces significant
challenges. The aim of policy‐makers is to shift the weight of the economy from the primary to the
secondary sector. The latter currently contributes 40% to GDP but the intention is that this will rise
in 55% in the short‐term and 70% in the medium‐term. The will produce a much more diversified
economy.
In the first part of the last 30 years the main drivers of growth were agriculture, diamond mining,
remittances from migrant mineworkers, and Southern African Customs Union (SACU) revenues.31 All
these drivers of growth, with the exception of diamond mining, have declined steeply in importance
in recent years.
In terms of livelihoods agriculture is the most important sector in Lesotho. About 40% of the
economically active population (or 69% of the labour force) is engaged in subsistence agriculture.
The agricultural sector, however, is in decline: in 1966 it contributed about 50% to GDP, but this
dropped to 20% by 2000, and it currently contributes only 8% to the GDP. This is only partly a
relative decline. The sector is fragile: only 9% of the land is arable, soil erosion is prevalent,
overstocking is a problem, and the sector is susceptible to natural disasters such as droughts and
floods. The country is no longer food secure and imports much of the food it requires from South
Africa.
A second major driver of growth in the past was remittances from men that migrated to work on
South African mines. In the 1980s there were 120 000 Basotho employed in the South African mining
30 Standing (n 29) at 359, 362. 31 Lesotho is a member of the Southern African Customs Union (SACU), together with South Africa, Namibia, Botswana and Swaziland.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
8.
sector but by 2012 this had dropped to 37 051.32 This decline translates, between 1992 and 2000, in
remittances dropping from a 40% contribution to GDP to a 30% contribution. These remittances
were particularly important for injecting cash into the rural economy and tiding subsistence farmers
over bad years.
Until fairly recently Lesotho and most of the other members of SACU shared disproportionately in
SACU revenue (South Africa effectively subsidised their development by taking a disproportionately
smaller share of the revenues). This share of revenue made up a very large proportion of total
income: in 2005 approximately 50% of Lesotho government revenue came from SACU. However,
new agreements about the formula for sharing revenues between the SACU members has seen
Lesotho’s share decline by an estimated 30% since 2005.
Currently Lesotho has two main growth generators in the short‐term: expanded diamond mining
and major water projects (and new investments in mining and water harvesting infrastructure have
led to a boom in the construction sector, albeit temporary). Diamond mining and water harvesting
are however highly capital intensive and therefore neither will impact significantly on employment.
Growth in the manufacturing sector has been driven by a rapid expansion of the textile and clothing
sector over the last 15 years. It earns both foreign exchange and creates much needed jobs: it
currently comprises about 50% of all formal employment and 80% of employment in the
manufacturing sector. Furthermore, over 80% of these jobs are filled by women. But the sector is
entirely foreign‐owned (Taiwanese and South African direct investment) and is to a large extent
dependent on the continuation of the African Growth Opportunity Act (AGOA). AGOA was due to
end in September 2015, which would have been catastrophic for the Lesotho economy, however a
10‐year extension has been granted by the US Congress. Even so, the garment sector in Lesotho is
struggling: employment is down to about 37 000 workers from a peak of 54 000 in 2004.
The main problem confronting Lesotho is that the economy is not generating enough jobs.
Employment growth has lagged GDP growth, and formal employment growth has lagged the growth
of the labour force as a whole. This means that the disruption caused by the declining agricultural
sector and the attempt to shift growth to manufacturing and services is resulting in high
unemployment and a growing informal economy. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that the
main drivers of growth have either created few jobs (the Lesotho Highlands Water Project and
diamond mines) or few local skills and no backward or forward linkages (the garment sector).
Poverty and unemployment are therefore very high and there is extreme income inequality.
In 2003, 56.6% of Lesotho’s population was below the poverty line, 58% in rural areas and 40% in
urban areas.33 The unemployment rate in 2003 was 28.7, which had risen to 29.4 in 2009. Of those
employed in 2008, 62% were informally employed (378 000) and only 38% were formally employed
(230 000). Of the informally employed, 51% was in what are classified as formal enterprises. So, 49%
would have been employed in informal enterprises, or what is termed the informal sector. Most of
32 The drop has been driven by the decline in the South African mining sector. Reduced demand for migrant labour will likely continue because of a policy of the South African mines to stop employing novice mineworkers from outside South Africa and because recent labour relations instability on the South African mines will probably lead to retrenchments. 33 Although very high this is a decline from 66.6% (year unknown). If one uses US$ 1 per day the poverty rate declines to 37%.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
9.
the latter was in the form of household activities such as subsistence agriculture, where payment is
mainly in kind. Subsistence agriculture, informal employment and high unemployment account for a
Gini coefficient of 57% in 1994/5, although subsequent growth resulted in some redistribution
because by 2002/3 the coefficient had declined to 53%.
The population of Lesotho is young (58% is under 19 years of age) and youth unemployment is
particularly high: 47% (compared to overall employment of 29.4% in 2009). This high youth
unemployment is driving urbanisation as the young move to towns to look for work. Although
Lesotho has a high literacy rate (free primary education was introduced in 2000) most youth do not
have employable skills, which is exacerbated by a lack of technical and vocational training facilities
for those youth who drop out of school (rural youth are far more likely to drop out of school before
completing primary education than urban youth).34
3.2 PolicyresponsetodirectdevelopmentinLesotho
Lesotho’s Vision 2020 sets out its development goals in broad terms, with the National Strategic
Development Plan 2012/13 – 2016/17 (NSDP) providing the detail.35 The NSDP is broadly neo‐liberal,
prioritising economic growth, which will be driven by the private sector and export‐led, as the
primary way to address the problems of poverty, inequality, unemployment. The NSDP, however,
acknowledges that moderate economic growth has not resulted in significant job creation and
poverty reduction – so policy has to give more attention to these issues in order to stimulate job‐rich
economic growth.
The NSDP identifies three priority sectors for growth and one other ‘growth generator’, namely what
it terms “deeper investment climate reforms”. The three sectors are:
Agriculture36
Manufacturing
Tourism
It is envisaged that growth in these sectors will stimulate demand in the ‘follower’ sectors: transport,
telecoms, construction, and business services.
The NSDP identifies 6 strategic goals, the first four of which relate to the economy and labour
market:
Pursue high shared and employment creating economic growth
Develop key infrastructure
34 Considerable investment has been made in primary education: free primary education was introduced in 2000, with the result that the school enrolment rate rose by almost 100 000 between 1999 and 2006. But there is a high dropout rate, so the investment has not translated into large numbers completing secondary schooling. However, the limited capacity of vocational, technical and higher learning institutions means that they cannot accommodate those young people completing secondary school. Furthermore, it seems that the labour market cannot absorb those that complete tertiary education and training in these institutions. 35 The Lesotho economy was set on a market‐oriented growth path by a structural adjustment programme (SAP) initiated with the support of the International Monetary Fund in 1988. Following the SAP a Poverty Reduction Strategy drove the development agenda, which was succeeded by an Interim National Development Framework, before the current National Strategic Development Plan was formulated and implemented. 36 We assume this means commercial agriculture.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
10.
Enhance the skills base, technology adoption and a foundation for innovation
Improve health, combat HIV and AIDS and reduce vulnerability
Reverse environmental degradation and adapt to climate change
Promote peace, democratic governance
The Lesotho United Nations Development Assistance Plan (LUNDAP) is closely integrated with the
NSDP, and has seven clusters that overlap with or complement the strategic goals of the NSDP.
Lesotho can be characterised as a model member of the ILO. It has ratified 23 ILO conventions,
including all eight fundamental conventions dealing with core rights at work, and is already on its
second Decent Work Country Programme (DWCP) (the first was for the period 2006 to 2009, and the
current programme is for 2012 to 2017). The DWCP fills a gap left by the NSDP and effectively
sketches out a labour market policy that more or less complements the NSDP.
The first Decent Work Country Programme reveals that Lesotho has received significant
international assistance in the past, including ILO and UNDP programmes to strengthen the factory
inspectorate with a focus on the OSH unit (1994‐1997), a project to improve national employment
services through employment policy formulation and labour market analysis, a project to promote
SMEs that focused on the national SME policy and strategy formulation (1994‐1997), and a project
to promote vocational education and training (1995‐1997).
The first DWCP identified two priorities: increased employment creation for poverty alleviation, and
improved social security coverage and effectiveness. Six country outcomes were indicated as flowing
from the achievement of these two priorities. However, it appears that the DWCP was not very
successful. Evaluation of the programme found that a “lack of an organisational arrangement or
structure negatively impacted on effective implementation and monitoring”, that there was a “lack
of ownership of the DWCP because of what was perceived as an ineffective consultation process”,
and that there was a “need for training of the national partners on the concept, process and content
of the DWCP”.
The second DWCP expanded its scope to three priorities: employment creation for all (particularly
the youth, women, and retrenched workers); social protection (with a focus on social security,
including improved conditions of work and occupational safety and health, and strengthening of
workplace responses to the HIV/AIDS epidemic); and, tripartism and social dialogue. The DWCP
identifies eleven ‘key result areas’ in respect of the above priorities:
Employment creation, particularly youth employment, is mainstreamed in national
development and sectoral planning frameworks
Increased number of sustainable MSMEs that create decent jobs, particularly for young
women and men, including displaced textile and mine workers
Improved competitiveness and productivity in the textile and garment sector
More people, including migrant workers, women, children and elderly persons, have access
to adequate and better‐managed social security benefits
Government and social partners respond more effectively to the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the
workplace
Workers and enterprises benefit from improved safety and health conditions at the
workplace
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
11.
Government, social partners and civil society have improved capacity to effectively eliminate
child labour, particularly the worst forms in Lesotho
Tripartism and social dialogue mechanisms are strengthened
Improved capacity of social partners to effectively participate in social dialogue mechanisms
Workers and enterprises benefit from good governance of the labour market and effective
labour administration services
Employers and workers have strong, independent and representative organisations
While the intentions of the DWCP are sound, the lack of capacity of the Lesotho government
suggests that the above is little more than a shopping‐list of outcomes based on wishful thinking. For
instance, it is noted that the country still did not have a comprehensive contributory‐based social
insurance scheme covering workers and their dependants. The initiatives to establish a scheme had
begun ten years before but had made little progress and there appeared to be a lack of government
will to finalise the policy and legislation for the National Social Security Scheme. It was noted further
that as a result “the bulk of the workforce, including those working in formal waged employment,
notably and foremost in MSMEs, are not covered by a contributory retirement scheme.” It proposed
that a general and comprehensive social security law would be developed that would provide legal
provisions for each social risk category, i.e. old age,37 workplace compensation, and maternity.
While the first DWCP noted an earlier UNDP‐funded initiative regarding technical and vocational
training, the subsequent DWCPs have not given much attention to this area other than with respect
to SMMEs and the textile and garment sector. This is arguably too narrow a focus and tends to side‐
line the critical issue of skills development as central to labour market policy. However, Lesotho’s
technical, vocational education and training (TVET) policy recommends the establishment of the
semi‐autonomous Lesotho Skills Agency (LSA) which will include Sector Skills Committees (SSC) the
will focus on the skills requirements of particular sectors. This approach was piloted in the garment
sector with assistance from the World Bank’s Private Sector Competitiveness and Economic
Diversification Project, which established two industry‐led Skills Development Centres in Maseru and
Maputsoe to address the need for improved skills in the sector. However, these centres became
defunct when the World Bank funding ran out, although there is currently an effort being made to
revive them.
3.3 Towardsalabourmarketpolicy
Labour market policy in Lesotho needs to have a strong development orientation, i.e. it needs to be
integrated with the NSDP and address the issues of economic growth, poverty, unemployment and
inequality. This suggests a nuanced policy that, first, takes account of the regional and sectoral
contours of the country’s economy, second, responds to and complements the transition the
economy is making from agriculture to secondary and tertiary sectors, and third, that the policy
addresses key labour market problems and development vulnerabilities. This includes taking account
of the fragility of the agricultural sector, the steep decline in jobs in South African mines, the risk to
the textile and garment sector posed by the ending of AGOA, and the urgent need to attract foreign
investment and better utilise domestic savings. In short, the priority for Lesotho is support for better
37 An old‐age pension was introduced in 2005 for citizens over 70 years of age. It has probably had some impact on poverty.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
12.
livelihoods in the subsistence agriculture sector, the transition of informal jobs to formal jobs, and
the creation of many more jobs.
The above outline of a labour market policy provides some context and direction for approaching
amendments to the Labour Code. Before getting into the detail of the amendments a broad
direction for labour market policy should be agreed that takes account of regional and sectoral
development prospects. We are proposing a layered approach that sees the extension of social
security as the foundation, health and safety and decent conditions of work as the second layer,
active labour market policy in the form of an enhanced skills development system as the third layer,
and flexible wage setting and collective bargaining as the fourth layer. Cutting across these layers is
massively improved enforcement. The above should be negotiated and monitored in tripartite
structures that take account of labour market as well as broader socio‐economic constraints and
objectives.
4. Lesotho’sLabourLawReformProjectandtheILO’stechnicalassistance
4.1 Backgroundinformation
Lesotho’s labour market is regulated by the Labour Code Order, 1992,38 as amended from time to
time.39 The ILO has been providing technical assistance to Lesotho over an extended period of
time;40 part of this assistance being an attempt to consolidate and amend the Code. In a 2005
assessment of its Improving Labour Systems in Southern Africa (ILSSA) project, law reform in Lesotho
was reported on as follows:
38 Labour Code Order 1992 (Order No. 24 of 1992) which codified and amended the law regulating employment in Lesotho. The Code regulates the offices of the Labour Commissioner, Labour Officers and the Registrar of Trade Unions and Employers’ Organisations. It establishes the Labour Court and the Registrar of the Court and the National Advisory Bodies. The Code provides for wage‐fixing machinery, contracts of employment, termination, dismissal and severance pay as well as the protection of wages. Health, safety and welfare at work are regulated in the Code, as are weekly rest, hours of work, holidays with pay, educational leave and sick leave. The employment of women, young persons and children is regulated in the Code, the use of certain labour agents and the contracts of foreign service and employment of non‐nations is covered in the Code. Provision is made for the registration of Trade Union organisations and employers’ organisations and for their rights and liabilities. The Code establishes a number of unfair labour practices and makes provision for the settlement of trade disputes through conciliation and arbitration. Strikes, lock‐outs and essential services as well as picketing and intimidation are regulated. 39 Significant amendments to the Code include:
Labour Code (Amendment) Act 22 of 1995;
Labour Code (Amendment) Act 9 of 1997;
Labour Code (Amendment) Act No. 3 of 2000 which provided the legal scaffolding for the Industrial Relations Council (IRC) and the Directorate of Dispute Prevention and Resolution (DDPR) to provide for the conciliation and arbitration of disputes, and to establish a Labour Appeal Court; and
Labour Code (Amendment) Act 5 of 2006, regulating matters around HIV/Aids in the workplace. 40 The ILSSA Report (note 9 at p. 8) documents the ILOs involvement in Lesotho (and other Southern African countries) since 2001. In October 2001 a three year USDOL project was implemented by the ILO on Strengthening Labour Administration in Southern Africa (SLASA) covering Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi and Zambia with the aim of ‘capacity‐building in labour ministers, especially with respect to labour administration and inspection, strengthening of labour dispute resolution institutions, and capacity‐building for workers’ and employers’ organisation. The project funding was extended and in 2004 SLASA was subsumed into ILSSA which primarily aimed to increase compliance with national labour laws and improve labour‐management relations. All ILSSA project activities in the region were to be completed by April 2008.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
13.
Review of Labor Code in Lesotho – The project provided an international expert’s
report in 2004, and subsequently facilitated a tripartite process for redrafting the
Labour Code. As of August 2006 the final draft amendments had been submitted to
ILO HQ for comments and analysis.41
These draft amendments however were subsequently not presented to Parliament in Lesotho and
therefore were not passed into law. Recently Lesotho has shown an interest in rectifying this state of
affairs and in August 2013 the Director of the ILO Decent Work Country Team (Eastern and Southern
Africa) received a request from Lesotho’s Ministry of Labour and Employment (MOLE) to assist with
the finalisation of the labour law review project that had stalled in 2006. What emerged from the
discussions is that the 2006 draft amendment bill was viewed by the Parliamentary Counsel (who are
responsible for the final preparation of legislation before presenting the legislation to Parliament) as
being ‘too bulky’. The position taken by Parliamentary Counsel is that the existing labour legislation
should be repealed and codified into a single piece of legislation, and that a narrative should be
provided to explain the provisions of the legislation. The ILO was requested to provide technical
assistance and a task team was established in Lesotho.42 As part of its technical assistance, the ILO
utilised our services to assist in the process. The expected outcomes of the consultancy were an
issues paper;43 a first draft of the revised Labour Code;44 and a Technical Memorandum on the
revised Labour Code. The brief was ultimately recast; it was made clear in discussions that the draft
legislation was not to be prepared by the consultant, and the assistance being requested was in the
preparation of an Issues Paper and in the drafting of instructions (a narrative) for the revised Labour
Code to guide the drafting process.
A consultation process – involving separate workshops with government and the social partners ‐
preceded the drafting of the Issues Paper, which identified the key areas for reform arising out of
the consultations.
4.2 Areasoflawidentifiedforreform
There was a consensus that emerged during the workshop around the broad themes for reform
although more contentious issues – such as flexible working conditions, the framework for collective
bargaining and the regulation of labour brokers ‐ remain contested. All parties agreed that the
objective of the current law reform project should extend beyond merely ensuring that the
provisions in the Draft Amendment Bill, 2006 get passed by Parliament. There have been significant
developments both within Lesotho and globally subsequent to the 2006 project and the parties
welcomed the opportunity to identify additional areas for reform.
41 Note 40 at p. 12. 42 The Task Team includes Lesotho’s Labour Commissioner, the MOLE legal officers, representatives of the social partners, the DDPR and the Occupational Health and Safety Inspector and a representative of Parliamentary Counsel. 43 A draft Issues Paper was presented to stakeholders in Lesotho at a workshop in Maseru on 30 June 2014 and, in response to feedback received both from the ILO and from participants at the June workshop, a Supplement to the Issues Paper was prepared for the National Task Team. 44 At the first meeting between the consultant and MOLE it was made clear that the consultant would not attend to any drafting of the Code but would provide guidance to the National Task Team in this regard, and would provide a technical memorandum to guide the drafting of the Code. After requests for clarification, it was established that a legal drafter from Parliamentary Counsel would be responsible for drafting of the Code.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
14.
The issues which emerged out of the workshops with the three stakeholders were categorised and
documented in the Issues Paper45 as follows:
The need for agreement on a broad direction for labour market policy46
A need to revise the scope of protection provided by the Labour Code47
Revising the regulatory framework for key labour market institutions48
The possibility of regulating standards through Regulations and Codes of Good
Practice49
Addressing deficits in the regulatory framework for the protection of children50
Revising aspects of the regulatory framework for collective bargaining51
Introducing flexibility into labour standards52
Concerns around the regulation of occupational health and safety53
Skills development54
Miscellaneous provisions that require amendment55
45 The Issues Paper (June 2014) was expanded upon in a Supplement to the Issues Paper (July 2014) and additional notes were provided to the Task Team to assist in their deliberations on the issues. More specifically, we provided the National Task Team with Notes on regulating the informal sector and who is an employee (July 2014); Notes on flexible working conditions (September 2014); and Notes on collective bargaining and organisational rights (November 2014), As part of the ILO intervention in Lesotho, a workshop on flexible working conditions and collective bargaining and organisational rights was hosted in November 2014. 46 See discussion below. 47 See discussion below. 48 Numerous concerns were raised around the current structure and functioning of the key labour market institutions, most of which were established in Part III of the Labour Code which provides the regulatory framework for the Minister, Labour Commissioner, Labour Officers and Registrar of Trade Unions and Employers’ Organisation, the National Employment Service, the Labour Court and the National Advisory Bodies (NACOLA and NACOSH). 49 The possibility of making better use of Regulations and Codes of Good Practice as mechanisms for promoting and providing clarity on labour standards was discussed and it was proposed that the revised Labour Code should establish a framework for this. 50 The 2006 Amendments, which did not pass, make provision for significant revisions to the current regulatory framework. These amendments need to be implemented. 51 There is a concern regarding certain limitations on the freedom of association and collective bargaining rights of ‘public officers’, which are contrary to the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 87 (1948) and the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention 98 (1949). In particular there are concerns that the Public Service Act provides that ‘public officers shall not engage in a strike’ and certain limitations on public officers’ freedom of association and the right to form a trade union. Other freedom of association and collective bargaining concerns related to teachers and minority trade unions; as well as mechanisms for registering collective agreements; clarity on essential service and on agency shop agreements as well as the possibility of developing the mechanisms for bargaining at sectoral level. 52 See the discussion below. 53 The possibility of separating out OSH legislation from the core Labour Code was raised, although caution was expressed in view of the slow process of getting legislation through Parliament. The 2006 Amendment Bill does provide for additional regulation of OSH in the workplace and the enactment of these provisions will address many of the current concerns. 54 The possibility for an enhanced regulatory framework for skills development was discussed and proposals were suggested in this regard, including the appointment of a Director for Skills Development, the establishment of a National Skills Development Council and general and sector specific training centres and a skills levy of 1% of the wage bill.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
15.
In addition, certain fairly technical issues were identified for expedited reform.56
Given that our broad approach to labour market regulation is that it should seek to complement and
integrate with the development policies in place, and the development needs of the recipient
country, we undertook a detailed examination of the economic and social conditions in Lesotho
which then informed our proposals in the Issues Paper.
The crux of our argument is that the adoption of labour standards in LDCs should not undermine the
broader development needs of an LDC, and in this regard, three of the themes we identified in the
Issues Paper, in particular, are deserving of further analysis, these are (1) the proposed broad
direction for labour market policy; (2) our proposals for revising the scope of protection provided by
the Labour Code; and (3) our proposals for introducing flexibility into labour standards. What
follows is a discussion of our proposals, the ILO standards and the ILO position on our proposals.
4.2.1 Theproposedbroaddirectionforlabourmarketpolicy
As the discussion in section 3 above reflects, Lesotho is currently undergoing major restructuring:
with Lesotho experiencing a shift from its reliance on subsistence farming, sustained by mining
remittances and SACU revenues, to increased urbanisation and a decline of the agricultural sector
being off‐set by rising exports, in particular of garments,57 water58 and the sale of diamonds.
Policy interventions are intended to support this shift from agriculture to manufacturing and
services,59 and to support skills development in this regard, however the economy is not generating
enough jobs resulting in high unemployment and a large informal economy.
We took the view that the labour market policy in Lesotho needs to have a strong development
orientation and that, before getting into the detail of the amendments, a broad direction for labour
market policy, taking into account the regional and sectoral development prospects, should be
agreed. We also took into account the significant capacity constraints faced in Lesotho and the
consequent barriers to enforcement in the face of high levels of non‐compliance.60 As Bronstein has
observed, rather than proposing a ‘perfect’ law, the ILO should seek ‘to offer legislative proposals
whose implementation could be realistically undertaken in the context of each country.’61
55 Various aspects of the current framework were raised for reform, including clarity on severance pay exemptions; protection of probationary employees; revisiting the prescription periods for referral of disputes to DDPR and the Labour Court; Labour Court jurisdiction; decriminalisation of non‐compliance; clarity on discrimination law; and issues relating to workmen’s compensation and social security law. 56 These were measures to clarify the enforcement of settlement agreements concluded at the DDPR; and severance pay obligations when other separation benefit schemes are in place. 57 Although the garment sector is the main generator of manufacturing growth, the sector is entirely foreign‐ owned and is dependent on the US African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) for half of its exports. Issues Paper, p. 16. 58 The Lesotho Highlands Project provides a source of income by supplying the Gauteng province in South Africa with water. In addition the project generates hydroelectric power for Lesotho. 59 Currently the secondary sector contributes 40% to GDP and in terms of the National Strategic Development Plan (NSDP) this is projected to rise to 55% in the short‐term and 70% in the medium‐term. Issues Paper p. 16) 60 ILO and UNDP programmes to strengthen the inspectorate are referred to in the text above. Some of the challenges faced in Lesotho with regard to monitoring and compliance are documented by the ILO at http://www.ilo.org/labadmin/info/WCMS_112603/lang‐‐en/index.htm. 61 Bronstein (note 16) at p. 356.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
16.
As a result, we proposed a variable (sector‐specific) approach to regulation, using a ‘layered’
approach to labour rights to achieve this. In terms of this approach, we proposed the extension of
social security as the foundation, health and safety and decent conditions of work as the second
layer, active labour market policy in the form of an enhanced skills development system as the third
layer, and flexible wage setting and collective bargaining as the fourth layer. Cutting across these
layers would be massively improved enforcement. Represented in a tabular form:
Table 1 ‘Layers’ of rights
4th layer Flexible wage setting and collective bargaining Enhanced
enforcement mechanism
3rd layer Active labour market policy : enhanced skills development system
2nd layer Health & safety and decent conditions of work
1st layer Extension of social security
We then suggested a variable approach to regulation, depending on the development needs within a
particular sector. More specifically we suggested the following:
The rural economy and subsistence agricultural sector: regulation should primarily be
geared to social protection, i.e. social security, plus health and safety, plus workmen’s
compensation; if wages are set they should be lower than wages in most other sectors. Child
labour should also be a focus in the agricultural sector.
The mining sector: we suggested dedicated health and safety provisions, a floor of basic
rights but with dedicated hours and wages for the sector; and rigorous enforcement.
The manufacturing sector (in urban areas): we suggested health and safety provisions, a
floor of basic rights, skills development, provision for wage determination in significant
sectors and the promotion of sectoral collective bargaining, and rigorous and improved
enforcement; but wages for youth should be low and be linked to learnerships and
apprenticeships, and SMEs below a certain size should be excluded from certain rights.
The services sector (in urban areas): we suggested health and safety provisions, a floor of
basic rights, skills development, provision for wage determination and rigorous and
improved enforcement; but wages for youth should be low and be linked to learnerships and
apprenticeships, and SMEs below a certain size should be excluded from certain rights.
Informal employment: in this regard, we felt that regulation should not attempt to address
informal employment in subsistence agriculture ‐ the most effective mechanism for
addressing livelihoods in the subsistence agriculture sector is extension services and similar
policy mechanisms (which are spelled out in much more detail in the NSDP); we suggest that
the key means to put a brake on the growth of informal employment is to target the
phenomenon at formal enterprises (mainly in urban areas) through better enforcement and
by giving employers flexibility with regard to certain categories of employment and hours of
work.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
17.
The ILO, in feedback on the Issues Paper in which we articulate this approach, expressed concerns
with this proposal; pointing out that the approach does not reflect ILO Conventions.
The ILO queried the genesis of the approach, arguing that the section would need to be redrafted to
remove implications that some sectors will not be able to enjoy Convention entitlements. What we
should have done in the Issues Paper is more clearly articulate the applicable Conventions,
reassuring the ILO and the partners in Lesotho, that the minimum standards in the ratified
Conventions would, at least, be complied with in all sectors.
In terms of our suggestions in relation to informal employment in subsistence agricultural, again the
ILO expressed concern also that our suggestion should not run afoul of the ILO Conventions that deal
with the agricultural sector. We engaged with the ILO on the feedback and the reasons for our
proposed approach which we clarified in greater detail in a supplement to the Issues Paper.
We reiterated that informal workers engaged in subsistence farming work in hard‐to‐reach rural
areas; that the Lesotho government works under significant capacity constraints which negatively
impacts their ability to enforce legislation; and that the production in subsistence farming is
vulnerable and precarious.
We proposed that definitions that identify informal workers in subsistence farming must be clearly
delineated62 and that any law reform in this regard must comply with the ILO definitions and
standards, such as the Convention concerning Safety and Health in Agriculture, 2001 (No. 184)63 and
the Recommendation Concerning Safety and Health in Agriculture, 2001 (No. 192), which contains
clauses dealing with self‐employed farmers and the idea of taking progressive steps towards
realising greater protections for vulnerable workers in the agricultural sector.64 In addition the
provisions of the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129)65 should be
considered.66
62 This could be by activity (ie production for household consumption) and by nature of relationship (for example members of a family). 63 Convention 184 provides for the formulation of a national policy on safety and health standards, and inspection, in agriculture. Article 3 of Convention 184 expressly provides that:
1. The competent authority of a Member … after consulting the representative organizations of employers and workers concerned: (a) may exclude certain agricultural undertakings or limited categories of workers from the
application of this convention or certain provisions thereof, when special problems of a substantial nature arise; and
(b) shall, in the case of such exclusions, make plans to cover progressively all undertakings and all categories of workers.
64 Recommendation 192 has a section titled Self‐employed farmers and provides extensively for self‐employed farmers and other who work with them. These provisions include:
Article 12 (1) Taking into consideration the views of representative organizations of self‐employed farmers, Members should make plans to extend progressively to self‐employed farmers the protection afforded by the Convention, as appropriate. (2) To this end, national laws and regulations should specify the rights and duties of self‐employed famers with respect to safety and health in agriculture. … Article 13 (1) … measures should be taken … to ensure that self‐employed farmers enjoy safety and health protection afforded by the Convention. (2) These measures should include: (a) provisions for the progressive extension of appropriate occupational health services for self‐employed farmers …
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
18.
4.2.2 RevisingthescopeofprotectionprovidedbytheLabourCode
Significant concern arose in the consultations around the desire to provide protection to the many
vulnerable workers in the informal sector and hence we reflected on the question of revising the
scope of protection provided by the Labour Code, bearing in mind the context of significant capacity
and enforcement constraints. We therefore recommended a process of gradual upgrading of rights,
suggesting ‘that employment rights be secured for informal workers in an incremental manner that
progressively realises these rights’.67
As mentioned, the bulk of informal employment in Lesotho is in the subsistence agriculture sector,
which often involves unpaid family labour and similar working arrangements undertaken in hard to
reach rural locations. Our recommendation, in view of the significant barriers to transforming these
rural working relationships, is to focus initially on informal employment in urban areas – specifically
in formal firms, and to facilitate a transition from informality to formality in these areas. In this
regard we recommended three strategies –
1. Clarity on the question who is an employee?
2. A measure of flexibility (as raised by the employers in consultations) so as to encourage
employers to formalise workers (even if as temporary/casual or part‐time); and
3. To provide a more effective system of inspections in urban‐based sectors, mines and
industry and in commercial agriculture
As mentioned above, the ILO expressed concerns around any proposal to exclude regulation of
employment in the agricultural sector (unless these were in conformity with ILO Convention 184 and
Recommendation 192).68 These instruments themselves provide for members to take progressive
steps toward realising greater protections for vulnerable workers in the agriculture sector.69
Article 14 Where economic, social and administrative conditions do not permit the inclusion of self‐employed farmers and their families in a national or voluntary insurance scheme, measures should be taken by members for their progressive coverage to the level provided for in Article 21 of the Convention. … Article 15 In giving effect to the above measures concerning self‐employed farmers, account should be taken of the special situation of: (a) small tenants and sharecroppers; (b) small owner‐operators; (c) persons participating in agricultural collective enterprises, such as members of farmers’ cooperatives; (d) members of the family as defined in accordance with national law and practice; (e) subsistence farmers; and (f) other self‐employed workers in agriculture, according to national law and practice.
65 Convention 129 provides (in Article 5) that Any member … may … undertake also to cover by labour inspection in agriculture one or more of the following categories of persons working in agricultural undertakings: (tenants who do not engage outside help, sharecroppers and similar categories of agricultural workers; (b) persons participating in a collective economic enterprise, such as members of a co‐operative’ (c) members of the family of the operator of the undertaking, as defined by national laws or regulations. (Underlining our emphasis) 66 Lesotho has not ratified these Conventions; however the ILO standards should inform the direction and the floor of rights provided to vulnerable workers. In addition, we indicate in the supplement paper, that ILO Conventions and Recommendations regulating basic working and employment conditions (ie the duration of working time, overtime, breaks, rest periods, night work, holidays and public holidays, and pay) and the extent to which flexibility is provided for in these Conventions should also be considered. 67 Issues Paper, p. 21. 68 Which is not ratified by Lesotho, although Lesotho has ratified the Right of Association (Agriculture) Convention, 1921 (no. 11). 69 See footnotes 63, 64 and 65 above.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
19.
On the proposed approach to flexibility (‘flexibility and formalisation’) concern was expressed by the
ILO that no empirical support is provided for the assumption that more flexible forms of
employment will increase formalisation, and in particular no empirical support was offered to
support the precise forms of casualization and part‐time work proposed. This is feedback which we
have taken to the employer party in Lesotho and is a matter that has subsequently been discussed
within the Task Team.
In essence, the Issues Paper proposed three categories of ‘flexible’ employees distinguished by
reference to both their hours of work and the manner of their engagement.
(a) Employees working 24 or less hours per month;
(b) Employees working more than 24 hours per month but 72 or less hours per month
on a temporary or irregular basis – these are described as ‘casual employees’;
(c) Employees working for more than 72 hours per month but less than the hours of a
full time employee, described as ‘part‐time employees’ who are employed
indefinitely or on a fixed‐term basis.
The relevant extract from the Issues Paper reads as follows:
On flexibility and formalisation: we would suggest that the key to formalising workers is to establish an
employment relationship with a formal employer. We therefore propose that legislation ‘favour’ casualization
over externalisation. Hence we propose introducing provision for a casual worker and a part‐time worker, which
will establish an employment relationship but will give employers the flexibility they might want. In this regard,
reform along the lines of the following provisions might be considered in respect of casual and part‐time work:
Any employee working 24 or less hours of work per month for an employer is excluded from the
provisions of the Labour Code dealing with annual leave, sick leave, maternity leave, educational
leave, notice of termination, severance pay. But the employer of such an employee must comply
with the ordinary daily hours of work and may not allow the employee to work more than 2 hours
overtime per day. Such overtime will be paid at 1.25 of the hourly rate. The employer must also
comply with the daily or hourly rates of any applicable wage order but not with provision for
maternity pay. Payment to be made daily.
An employee working more than 24 hours per month but 72 or less hours per month on a
temporary or irregular basis is classified as a ‘casual’ employee. Such an employee cannot have a
reasonable expectation of continued employment or re‐employment, and is excluded from sick
leave, maternity leave, educational leave, notice of termination, severance pay and weekly rest
periods. But the employer of such an employee must comply with the annual leave provision on a
pro rata basis, with one day of paid annual leave for every 23 days worked in a year. Furthermore,
the employer must comply with ordinary daily hours of work and may not allow the employee to
work more than 2 hours overtime per day. Such overtime will be paid at 1.5 of the hourly rate. The
employer must also comply with the daily or hourly rates of any applicable wage order but not with
provision for maternity pay. Payment to be made daily.
An employee working for more than 24 hours per month but less than the hours of work of a full‐
time employee who is employed indefinitely or on a fixed‐term contract is classified as a part‐time
employee. A part‐time employee is excluded from educational leave and weekly rest periods. The
employer of such an employee must comply with daily or hourly rates of any applicable wage
order, and must comply with annual leave, sick leave and maternity leave provisions on a pro rata
basis, the notice of termination provision, and severance pay. Sunday work must be paid at x2.
If any of the above work on a public holiday they must be paid at x2 their minimum or their normal
daily rate, whichever is the higher.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
20.
In terms of our proposal, employees in the identified categories would enjoy varying rights: an issue
which concerned the ILO. For example, category (b) workers would not enjoy sick leave or maternity
leave. The ILO was concerned that the proposal may have deleterious effects on women workers in
particular, who are frequently in more precarious, short‐term and/or part‐time employment.
The ILO expressed concern in relation to the proposed flexibility and requested further detail and
justification for the proposals. The ILO requested an explanation of the basis for the categorisation
and the link between the category and (non)entitlement to benefits, and how the categorisation
interacted with the existing provisions around the types of contracts provided for in the Labour
Code, and for compliance with ILO instruments to be specifically addressed.70
We explained in the supplement to the Issues Paper that the development context in Lesotho
suggests the need for a nuanced approach to flexibility, and that any variation of core labour
standards should not be inconsistent with ILO Conventions. We clarified that the particular type of
flexibility we are proposing i.e. provision for various types of casual and part‐time worker, we
believe is better regulated and more easily enforced than if the flexibility is achieved through
externalisation (e.g. using labour brokers or independent contractors).71
As we explain in the supplement, one reason for suggesting the flexibility options we do is that it was
a point raised (and presented in some detail) by employers, but more importantly, we believe it will
be a way of formalising employment, by providing employers with flexible but regulated options for
employing workers. The hope is that this would be a stepping stone into full‐time, indefinite
employment. It is therefore to give a particular route to flexibility for employers but in a way that
will lead to a reduction in the large number of informal workers. However, we do not have detailed
knowledge of the types of casualization and externalisation that is being practiced in Lesotho, and
the different types of non‐standard employment that they are creating, and we recommended to
the parties that they modify our suggestions to meet their particular needs. We indicate that to
motivate for innovations that provide for greater flexibility it would be useful to consider statistical
analysis from key industry sectors indicating the need for, and benefits to be derived from, a more
flexible labour market.
70 Specifically, our attention was drawn to the Part‐time Work Convention C175, article 8:
1. Part‐time workers whose hours of work or earnings are below specified thresholds may be excluded by a Member:
(a) from the scope of any of the statutory social security schemes referred to in Article 6, except in regard to employment injury benefits; (b) from the scope of any of the measures taken in the fields covered by Article 7, except in regard to maternity protection measures other than those provided under statutory social security schemes.
2. The thresholds referred to in paragraph 1 shall be sufficiently low as not to exclude an unduly large percentage of part‐time workers. 3. A Member which avails itself of the possibility provided for in paragraph 1 above shall:
(a) periodically review the thresholds in force; (b) in its reports on the application of the Convention under article 22 of the Constitution of the International Labour Organization, indicate the thresholds in force, the reasons therefor and whether consideration is being given to the progressive extension of protection to the workers excluded.
4. The most representative organizations of employers and workers shall be consulted on the establishment, review and revision of the thresholds referred to in this Article. (Underlining our emphasis) 71 Our proposal is based, not on principled or ideological grounds, but is intended as a pragmatic response to the realities faced in the labour market.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
21.
The theme of flexibility, as a measure to balance Lesotho’s specific development needs with an
increased and effective floor of labour rights, was carried through to our proposals for the revision
of labour standards.
4.2.3 Introducingflexibilityintolabourstandards
Part VI of Lesotho’s labour code regulates weekly rest, hours of work, holidays with pay, educational
leave and sick leave; and in this regard we proposed the introduction of a variety of alternative ways
of articulating hours of work in the Labour Code. More specifically, we suggested that provision be
made for the compression of ordinary weekly hours of work; for the compression of monthly hours;
and for the averaging of weekly hours over four months.
An extract of our recommendation in the Issues Paper is as follows:
An alternative way of articulating hours of work that accommodates flexibility in the context of hours of work is
to provide for a variety of alternatives to the existing norm, for example to include in the Labour Code:
Provision for compression of ordinary weekly hours of work within a week subject to a maximum of 12
hours per day without overtime pay. Excludes Sundays.
By agreement with [xxx]
Transport arrangements [xxx]
Provision for compression of monthly hours of (4.3 x 45 = 193.5 hours) within a month without overtime
pay subject to a maximum of 11 hours per day, 6 hours on Saturdays and excluding Sundays.
By agreement with [xxx]
Transport [xxx] expediency
Provision for averaging of weekly hours over four months subject to maximum of 56 hours per week,
with hours over 52 hours in a week to be paid at 1.25 overtime pay.
By agreement with [xxx]
Transport [xxx]
The ILO cautioned that the introduction of any new measures of flexibility must occur on the basis of
appropriate empirical evidence and within the framework of the applicable Conventions, and
recounted the link between working hours and health and safety outcomes. In this regard, we have
provided the national task team that has taken ownership of the law reform process with further
notes on flexible working conditions and a table of the working conditions that are under review
juxtaposed alongside the ILO standard and comparative examples in the region.
Through a process of iteration between the consultant and the ILO expert, the Issues Paper was
supplemented;72 and additional material was provided to the Lesotho Task Team for further
reflection by the Task Team.73 In the notes provided to the national task team, we pose a series of
questions for the task team to reflect on. The indication from Lesotho is that further engagement
72 Supplement to the Issues Paper, July 2014. 73 The following were provided: Notes on Regulating the Informal Sector and who is an Employee (29 July 2014); Notes on Flexible Working Conditions (10 September 2014(; and Notes on Collective Bargaining and Organisational Rights (26 November 2014).
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
22.
between the parties is taking place and, from time to time, the task team raises questions for further
clarification and provides the minutes from its meetings and, recently, a schedule detailing a
timeline for the reform process was forthcoming. The hurdles faced by the team in Lesotho are
significant, what is encouraging is the sense of ownership of the project, and commitment to the
process which are implicit in the recent communications from Lesotho.
5 Summaryandconclusion
5.1 Thesignificantchallengesinlabourlawreforminaleastdevelopedcountrycontext
Earlier we identified four categories of constraints that may hinder labour law reform, and which are
perhaps amplified in the least‐developed country context. In this section we return to these themes
and provide a brief summary of these constraints as experienced in the Lesotho project.
The first two (stakeholder resource and capacity constraints and the host country political and policy
context) are internal to Lesotho, although still open to positive influence by the ILO. For example,
tailored training programmes, and providing support to the legislative drafting process will build
stakeholder capacity. The ILO has power to influence policy developments,74 although political
influence is perhaps more difficult, but not impossible, to conceptualise.75
In the case of Lesotho, the ‘one‐size‐fits‐all’ approach to labour standards and the negotiated
boundaries for external consultants are factors which are linked. One of the issues we grappled with
in reflecting on the approach we should recommend in the Issues Paper is the tension between an
aspirational approach on the one hand, in which high standards might be adopted but which, in
reality, will be met with low levels of compliance, and a more pragmatic approach on the other
hand, in which more realistic standards are set and a higher level of compliance is therefore likely to
be achieved. Should our approach have been aspirational or rather one that is feasible and realistic?
The ILO was open to our interaction in this regard, and perhaps it is a matter on which we should
have more robustly engaged earlier on in the process, alongside a discussion of the ILOs
expectations of the consultant in the process.
5.2 Suggestionsonfacilitatingdevelopmentinalabourlawreformcontext
It struck us throughout the reform process that Lesotho’s capacity constraints in terms of law‐
making and enforcement present significant (at times seeming insurmountable) hurdles in the
process of finalising a revised Labour Code. While this certainly should not detract from the ILO’s
commitment to technical cooperation in Lesotho, with law reform as its ultimate goal, what we did
experience as a particularly successful form of intervention in Lesotho that results in the upgrading
of labour standards76 in the garment industry is the ILO/IFC77 Better Work partnership. Better Work
74 Examples include the ILO’s Decent Work Country Programme Phase I 2006 – 2009; and the Decent Work Country Programme Phase II 2012‐2017. 75 Consider for example the ILO’s stance on Apartheid in South Africa. 76 Standards that have been improved include those relating to health and safety, harassment, HIV discrimination, increased maternity leave and other maternity rights. See http://betterwork.org/global/?page_id=322. 77 International Labour Organisation / International Finance Corporation.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
23.
Lesotho aims to ‘reduce poverty by creating decent work opportunities in Lesotho’s garment
industry.’78
The gains for labour derived from the Better Work programme are significant and could not easily
have been achieved through law reform alone. Programmes such as Better Work can play an
important role, complementary to the ILO’s traditional method of technical assistance, in raising,
implementing, and enforcing labour standards.
5.3 Concludingremarks
Labour law reform in a least‐developed country context presents a number of complex challenges
which call for innovative, collaborative and responsive interventions and in our view, the ILO is the
organisation best placed to co‐ordinate such an intervention. In the context of Lesotho, for us it has
been a privilege to be involved in the unfolding process in Lesotho.
78 This is achieved ‘[b]y conducting independent factory assessments against national and international labour standard as well as advisory and training services, [and] the programme assists factories in the remediation of non‐compliances.’ Better Work Lesotho, Better Work Lesotho: Thematic Synthesis Report: Contracts’, (2014) ILO/IFC. at p. 4.
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
24.
Bibliography
Primary sources Legislation in Lesotho:
Constitution of Lesotho, 1993
Labour Code Order, 1992 (Order no. 24 of 1992)
Labour Code (Amendment) Act 1997 (Act No. 9 of 2006)
Labour Code (Amendment) Act 2000 (Act No. 3 of 2000)
Labour Code (Amendment) Act 2005 (Act No. 5 of 2006)
Draft Amendment Bill, 2006
ILO Conventions and Recommendations:
Convention concerning Safety and Health in Agriculture, 2001 (No. 184)
Recommendation Concerning Safety and Health in Agriculture, 2001 (No. 192)
Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129)
Part‐time Work Convention, 1994 (No. 175)
Policy in Lesotho:
Government of Lesotho, National Strategic Development Plan 2012/13 – 2016/17 (September 2012).
Government of Lesotho, National Vision 2020
Draft National Employment Policy, 2014
Lesotho Industrial Policy, 2011‐2013 (Aug 2010)
Ministry of Trade & Industry, Cooperatives & Marketing, Lesotho Competition Policy, 2007
National Investment Policy of Lesotho, 2013
ILO policy and related documents:
Better Work Lesotho, Better Work Lesotho: Thematic Synthesis Report: Contracts’, (2014) ILO/IFC. Lesotho Decent Work Country Programme 2006 to 2009
Lesotho Decent Work Country Programme Phase II 2012 to 2017
Report on Addressing the Implementation Deficits: Assisting the Constituents in Lesotho to Implement the Comments of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations (CEACR) 2014.
Collier, Debbie and Godfrey, Shane ‘Review of Labour Legislation in Lesotho’ Issues Paper (June 2014)
**** NOT FOR CITATION ****
25.
Secondary sources:
Blackett, Adele ‘Beyond standard setting; a study of ILO technical cooperation on regional labour law reform in West and Central Africa’ (2010‐2011) (32) Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 443‐492
Bronstein, Arturo ‘The role of the International Labour Office in the framing of national labor law’ (2004‐2005) (26) Comparative Labor law & Policy Journal 339‐369.
Motsamai, Dimpho Southern Africa Report: Elections in a time of instability – Challenges for Lesotho beyond the 2015 poll (April 2015) Issue 3, Institute for Security Studies.
Standing, Guy ‘The ILO: An Agency for Globalisation?’ (2008) 39 Development and Change 355 – 384.
University of Melbourne ‘Improving Labour Systems in Southern Africa’ Centre for Employment & Labour Relations Law, University of Melbourne, Med‐term Evaluation: Final Report October 2006