IL PIANO DI LAVORO NMBP 2017 - polito.it · ain/h2020-wp1617-intro_en.pdf. A Deeper and Fairer...
Transcript of IL PIANO DI LAVORO NMBP 2017 - polito.it · ain/h2020-wp1617-intro_en.pdf. A Deeper and Fairer...
Politecnico di Torino10 Giugno 2016
IL PIANO DI LAVORO NMBP 2017
Nanotecnologie, materiali avanzati, biotecnologie, manifatturiero e processi
avanzati Serena Borgna
National Contact Point Bioeconomy – NMBP - ERC
Agenda
• Overview policies and key elements of interest for NMBP area
• Statistics about last call NMBP – 2014/2015
• Work programme 2017 – list of topics
• Eligibility criteria and type of actions
2
Europa2020
InnovationUnion
Horizon 2020
3
NMBP
JUNCKER Presidency
priorities
CONTESTO POLITICO/1
4
Five of the JUNCKER PRESIDENT'S PRIORITIES: To boost jobs, growth and investment;
To realise a connected digital single market;
To implement a resilient Energy Union with a forward looking climate change policy;
To develop a deeper and fairer internal market with a strengthened industrial base;
To make Europe a stronger global actor
Strategic priorities of COMMISSIONER MOEDAS:
Open innovation, Open science, Open to the world
CONTESTO POLITICO/2
5
Sustainable jobs and growth: Boost jobs, growth and investment Deeper and fairer internal market with a strengthened industrial base
Re-industrialisation of EU: towards a strong industrial base
Digital Single Market: Factories of the Future, '4th industrial revolution' – link to Digital Single Market
EU Energy Union: Energy-efficient Buildings, Materials for Energy, etc.
Circular economy: boosting growth and renewing industrial capacities in a world of finite resources
H2020 WP 2016-17 Introduction
6
http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-intro_en.pdf
A Deeper and Fairer Internal Market witha Strengthened Industrial Base*
• The internal market is one of Europe’s best assets in times of increasing globalisation and provides a strong basis for our companies and industry to thrive in the global economy. To reach its full potential, European industry needs to combine advanced manufacturing with sustainability and the solutions developed for societal challenges. This Work Programme will contribute to maintaining and reinforcing a strong and high-performing European industrial base and primary sector. The research and innovation activities will help maintain our global leadership in strategic sectors with high-value jobs by stimulating investment in new technologies, processes and business models, easing access to finance and up-scaling investment in the development of innovative skills.
7
A Deeper and Fairer Internal Market witha Strengthened Industrial Base*
1. The Industry 2020 in the Circular Economy call will contribute to boosting and renewing Europe's industrial capacities and the real economy, while ensuring economic, environmental and social sustainability, in the context of the circular economy, and providing the basis to the transition towards a smart, dynamic, competitive, resource-efficient and low-carbon European industrial economy. While the engagement of industry is essential, full societal success will depend upon a systemic approach, including new production, consumption and behaviour patterns, with strong multi-stakeholder and multi-disciplinary involvement and engagement of civil society.
8
A Deeper and Fairer Internal Market witha Strengthened Industrial Base*
2. Promoting healthy ageing and personalised healthcare
3. Blue Growth
4. Sustainable Food Security
5. Mobility for Growth
+Key enabling technologies (KETs) supporting the development of new goods, industrial processes and services as well as product-service systems, and including cross-cutting KET actions, with the potential to create unforeseen advances and new markets, will also help strengthen Europe industrial base.
9
H2020 WP 2016-17 Strategic orientation in NMBP
10
http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-leit_en.pdf
STRATEGIC ORIENTATION
A great number of activities aim to develop innovative technologies bringing them closer to the markets, including a progress towards higher Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs).
This will help the manufacturing sectors to adapt to global competitive pressure by improving their technological base. As proposed in the European KET Strategy, the KET parts of this work programme use TRLs where relevant.
This Work Programme addresses TRLs from 3-4 up to 7, with an overall centre of gravity in the range from 5-6, with the highest level reserved for cases where there is strong industrial commitment.
11
STRATEGIC ORIENTATION/2Aspects to be considered by proposals:
Well-targeted value chains enable to capture value to Europe –this aspect should be reflected in the quality of the consortium and the work plan to ensure optimal structure to maximise impact.
Adequate balance of industrial and research partners for the delivery of the expected outcome beyond the end of the project.
In order to facilitate up-scaling, aspects such as demonstration, transfer and piloting should be included as a part of the R&D&I actions. Where standardisation needs are identified, they should be followed up.
The integration of business development, time to market, and market understanding, together with the understanding and exploitation of customized and personalized products and services in the business-to-business context is necessary to meet innovation needs in the range TRL 5-7.
12
STRATEGIC ORIENTATION/3 Proof-of-concept prototypes, demonstration, assessments,
platform-building activities, and pilots help to overcome the acceptance barrier, increase trust and convince potential users, express additional value benefits for diversified communities, provide seeds for new projects of the proposers also in other parts of Horizon 2020, and develop mechanisms for facilitating value creation in the real economy.
Non-technical and regulatory issues regarding health, safety and the environment should accompany the development of industrial applications, especially in fields such as nanotechnologies, where potential risks and public concerns have been identified.
Including social sciences and humanities (SSH) expertise in the approach can provide a constructive and critical accompaniment of the scientific and technological developments in funded projects 13
CROSS-CUTTING KETSCross-cutting KETs bring together and integrate different KETs and reflect the interdisciplinary nature of technological development. They have the potential to lead to unforeseen advances and new markets, and are important contributions to new technological components or products. The integration of different KETs represents a vital activity in Horizon 2020. Over the course of Horizon 2020, around 30% of the budget allocated to KETs will go to integrated KETs projects. Cross-cutting KETs activities will in general include activities closer to market and applications ( ex. pilot lines and demonstrator). Manufacturability will often be a key issue on the innovation path towards the market, and pilot activities will normally combine at least two different KETs and integrated advanced manufacturing technologies/processes, in a way that value is created beyond the mere addition of the individual technologies for a component or product. 14
Europa2020
InnovationUnion
Horizon 2020
15
NMBP
Key Enabling Technologies – KEThttp://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/key-enabling-technologies/european-strategy/high-level-group/index_en.htm
EU Industrial Policyhttp://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/eu/index_en.htm
LEIT introductionhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-leit_en.pdf
Recommendationhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/pdf/policy/commission-recommendation-on-the-definition-of-nanomater-18102011_en.pdf
Regulatory Aspectshttp://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/policy_en.html
European Technologies Platformshttp://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/index_en.cfm?pg=etp#etps
ERANEThttp://netwatch.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
Joint Research Center (JRC)
Excellent Science
European Research Council
Frontier research by the best individual teams
Future and Emerging Technologies
Collaborative research to open new fields of innovation
Marie Skłodowska Curie actions
Opportunities for training and career development
Research infrastructures (including e-infrastructure)
Ensuring access to world-class facilities
Societal Challenges
Health, demographic change and wellbeing
Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine and maritime research & the bioeconomy
Secure, clean and efficient energy
Smart, green and integrated transport
Climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials
Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies
Security society
European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)
Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation
Science with and for society
16
Industrial Leadership
Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies
ICT, nanotechnologies,
materials, biotechnology, manufacturing, space
Access to risk finance
Leveraging private finance and venture capital for research and innovation
Innovation in SMEs
Fostering all forms of innovation in all types of SMEs
LEIT – NMBPNanotechnologies, Advanced Materials,
Biotechnology and Advanced Manufacturing and Processing
H2020 structure
Excellent Science
European Research Council
Frontier research by the best individual teams
Future and Emerging Technologies
Collaborative research to open new fields of innovation
Marie Skłodowska Curie actions
Opportunities for training and career development
Research infrastructures (including e-infrastructure)
Ensuring access to world-class facilities
Industrial Leadership
Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies
ICT, nanotechnologies, materials, biotechnology, manufacturing, space
Access to risk finance
Leveraging private finance and venture capital for research and innovation
Innovation in SMEs
Fostering all forms of innovation in all types of SMEs
Societal Challenges
Health, demographic change and wellbeing
Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine and maritime research & the bioeconomy
Secure, clean and efficient energy
Smart, green and integrated transport
Climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials
Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies
Security society
European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)
Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation
Science with and for society
Joint Research Center (JRC)17
H2020 structure
SME INSTRUMENTFAST TRACK TO INNOVATION
Excellent Science
European Research Council
Frontier research by the best individual teams
Future and Emerging Technologies
Collaborative research to open new fields of innovation
Marie Skłodowska Curie actions
Opportunities for training and career development
Research infrastructures (including e-infrastructure)
Ensuring access to world-class facilities
Industrial Leadership
Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies
ICT, nanotechnologies, materials, biotechnology, manufacturing, space
Access to risk finance
Leveraging private finance and venture capital for research and innovation
Innovation in SMEs
Fostering all forms of innovation in all types of SMEs
Societal Challenges
Health, demographic change and wellbeing
Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine and maritime research & the bioeconomy
Secure, clean and efficient energy
Smart, green and integrated transport
Climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials
Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies
Security society
European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)
Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation
Science with and for society
Joint Research Center (JRC)18
BOTTOM UP
TOP -DOWN
BOTTOM UP
(SME)
TOP -DOWN
BOTTOM UP
(SME)TOP -DOWN
H2020 structure
Excellent Science
European Research Council
Frontier research by the best individual teams
Future and Emerging Technologies
Collaborative research to open new fields of innovation
Marie Skłodowska Curie actions
Opportunities for training and career development
Research infrastructures (including e-infrastructure)
Ensuring access to world-class facilities
Industrial Leadership
Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies
ICT, nanotechnologies, materials, biotechnology, manufacturing, space
Access to risk finance
Leveraging private finance and venture capital for research and innovation
Innovation in SMEs
Fostering all forms of innovation in all types of SMEs
Societal Challenges
Health, demographic change and wellbeing
Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine and maritime research & the bioeconomy
Secure, clean and efficient energy
Smart, green and integrated transport
Climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials
Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies
Security society
European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)
Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation
Science with and for society
Joint Research Center (JRC)19
H2020 structure
SME INSTRUMENT FAST TRACK TO
INNOVATION
COLLABORATIVE PROJECT (RIA –IA –CSA- …)
Joint Research Center (JRC)
Excellent Science
European Research Council
Frontier research by the best individual teams
Future and Emerging Technologies
Collaborative research to open new fields of innovation
Marie Skłodowska Curie actions
Opportunities for training and career development
Research infrastructures (including e-infrastructure)
Ensuring access to world-class facilities
Societal Challenges
Health, demographic change and wellbeing
Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine and maritime research & the bioeconomy
Secure, clean and efficient energy
Smart, green and integrated transport
Climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials
Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies
Security society
European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)
Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation
Science with and for society
20
Industrial Leadership
Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies
ICT,
NANOTECHNOLOGIES,
MATERIALS, BIOTECHNOLOGY, MANUFACTURING, space
Access to risk finance
Leveraging private finance and venture capital for research and innovation
Innovation in SMEs
Fostering all forms of innovation in all types of SMEsLEIT – NMBP
Nanotechnologies, Advanced Materials, Biotechnology and Advanced
Manufacturing and Processing
H2020 structure
Industrial Leadership (LEIT NMBP)
Rationale: Gli investimenti strategici nelle tecnologie-chiave (es.
tecnologie industriali avanzate, microelettronica) rafforzano l’innovazione nei settori già maturi e in quelli emergenti
L’Europa ha bisogno di attrarre ulteriori investimenti privati in ricerca e innovazione
L’Europa necessita di un numero maggiore di PMI innovative capaci di stimolare la crescita e creare posti di lavoro
21
Policy developments, to create favourable conditions
• Stimulate demand-side actions
• Better collaboration between the public/private sectors to stimulate investments (e.g. links between Horizon 2020 and European Fund for Strategic Investments – EFSI)
• Financing (e.g. new approaches for SMEs, risk-sharing, risk-financing)
• Better regulation
• Standardisation
• New skills / training / education
• Promoting entrepreneurship (e.g. KIC on Added Value Manufacturing)
• Knowledge and risk management for products and industries
• Public procurement
• Programme evaluation of FP7 / Mid-term review of Horizon 2020
23
LEIT – NMBP part of Horizon 2020
• Guiding principles:• Partnership with industry, to stimulate private investment• Targeting value chains• Demonstration and piloting
• Support for 4 of the 6 Key Enabling Technologies (KETs)• Nanotechnologies• Advanced Materials• Biotechnology• Advanced Manufacturing / Processing Technology Readiness Levels: Bridging TRLs from 3 to 6-7, with
emphasis on expected impact (business cases)
• Focus on EU Manufacturingin the context of '4th industrial revolution'
• Enhanced synergies with Societal Challenges / FETs
23
DEFINITIONKey Enabling Technologies
Knowledge-intensive technologies associatedwith high R&D intensity, rapid and integratedinnovation cycles, high capital expenditure andhighly-skilled employment
Enable process, goods and service innovationthroughout the economy and are of systemicrelevance
Multidisciplinary, cutting across many technologyareas with a trend towards convergence andintegration“
*Current situation of key enabling technologies in Europe, SEC (2009)
Photonics
Manufacturing
Nanotechnologies
Biotechnology
Micro/Nanoelectronics
Advanced Materials
24
A large part of Industrial Leadership (~6Bio€) is about mastery and deployment of Key Enabling Technologies (KETs)
What are KETs?
• Six strategic technologies
• Driving competitiveness and growth
• Contributing to solving societal challenges
• Knowledge- and Capital- intensive
• Cut across many sectors
European KET Strategy
• EC Communications (2009)512 & (2012)341
• KET High-level Group
– final report 'KETs: Time to Act', June 2015
• Nanotechnologies• Advanced Materials• Micro- and nano-
electronics• Photonics• Biotechnology• Advanced
Manufacturing and Processing
Societal
Challenge
Example - combining several KETs for advanced
productsAdvanced materials
Photonics
Microelectronics
Nanotechnologies
Biotechnologies
New nanotechnology-
based diagnostics
New target drug
delivery and release
Regenerative medecine
27
TRL 1 – basic principles observedTRL 2 – technology concept formulatedTRL 3 – experimental proof of conceptTRL 4 – technology validated in labTRL 5 – technology validated in relevant environment (industrial environment inthe case of key enabling technologies)TRL 6 – technology demonstrated in relevant environment (industrial environmentin the case of key enabling technologies)TRL 7 – system prototype demonstration in operational environmentTRL 8 – system complete and qualifiedTRL 9 – actual system proven in operational environment (competitivemanufacturing in the case of key enabling technologies; or in space)
STATISTICS:NMBP WP 2014-15
28
WP 2014-15 thanks to Prof. Donata MedagliniItalian rappresentative LEIT NMBP programme committeee
29
Budget/ Calls 2014-2015
Budget 2014-2015 : 992,2 € million
Budget NMBP Calls
Budget 2016-2017 : 966,9 € million
No.
Partecipanti
italiani in
proposte
presentate
No. Partecipanti
italiani
finanziati
Tasso di
successo
partecipanti
Italiani
813 122 15%
No. Proposte
presentate a
coordinament
o italiano
No.
Coordinamenti
italiani
finanziati
Tasso di
successo
coordinatori
Italiani
76 11 14,5%
Partecipazione
Coordinamento
Contributo finanziario
per l’Italia
48.03 M €(~10% del budget totale)
~ 13% Progetti finanziati sono a Coordinamento Italiano
No. proposte
presentate
No. Proposte
finanziate
Tasso medio
di successo
603 96 16% (tasso medio di successo
del programma NMBP: 8%)
Calls NMBP 2014: RESULTS
No.
Partecipanti
italiani in
proposte
presentate
No. Partecipanti
italiani
finanziati
Tasso di
successo
partecipanti
Italiani
1045 107 10.2%
No. Proposte
presentate a
coordinament
o italiano
No.
Coordinamenti
italiani
finanziati
Tasso di
successo
coordinatori
Italiani
106 7 6.5%
Partecipation
Coordination
Contributo finanziario
per l’Italia
45.7 M €(~10.7% del budget
totale )
Calls NMBP 2015: RESULTS
NMBP WORK PROGRAMME 2014-2015
PPPs in NMBP 2014-2015
FoF SPIREEeB
% of EU funding to ITALY
topics 2014 topics 2015
FoF 7 19 % 7 16.9%
SPIRE 4 3% 4 9.6%
EeB 4 10,0% 4 10%
EU funding for cPPPs in H2020 per country
PPPs in NMBP 2014-2015
Results NMP 2014 – 2015 (2 stage)
2119
13 12
97 7 6
0
5
10
15
20
25
Participation in retained proposals
2014
2015
Year Topics IT Participants
success rate*
IT Coordinators
success rate*% EU funding
2014 8 29% 57% 14.3%
2015 10 24% 21% 10.3%
2015
* Success rate = selezionate / presentate
LEIT-BIO IN NMBP 2014 - 2015
38
Retained: 2
Funding: 15.1 M€Pass: 6
Funding: 38.8 M€
STAGE 2
Received: 12
Eligible: 12
Funding: 85.3 M€
Success rate ~17%
STAGE 1
Received: 52
Eligible: 51
GO: 12
Reserve: 1
Funding: 6 M€
Retained: 3
Funding: 22.5 M€Pass: 6
Funding: 49.7 M€
STAGE 2
Received: 14
Eligible: 14
Funding: 108.1 M€
Success rate ~21%STAGE 1
Received: 45
Eligible: 43
GO: 14
Reserve: 2
Funding: 17.8 M€
BIOTEC 1-2014: Synthetic biology
BIOTEC 3 – 2014 Widening industrial application of enzymatic processesBIOTEC 4 - 2014 Downstream processes unlocking biotechnological transformations
EU Funding to Italy: ~3% of EU funding
LEIT-BIO IN NMBP 2014: results (2 stage)
39
8.4
02
.31
3 €
4.3
51
.28
0 €
2.4
89
.86
0 €
2.3
77
.55
1 €
1.8
74
.81
6 €
1.7
77
.09
9 €
1.2
09
.37
5 €
1.0
96
.78
1 €
86
1.4
13
€
53
6.8
75
€
0 €
DE ES DK NO UK FR NL PT SE SI CH
2 topics
Eligible proposals: 22
Call budget 28.840.000 €
Requested EC funding
177.912.669 €
Average size 8.045.866 €
3 retained for funding
proposals
24,977,363 € EC Funding
Success rate: 14.2 %
IT participants in submitted proposals: 6Funding to Italy: 0 %
LEIT-BIO IN NMBP 2015: results (2 stage)
BIOTEC-2 : New bioinformatic approaches in service to biotechnologies
BIOTEC 5: Metagenomics as innovation driver
1° stage NMBP 2016
Topic Code
Number of Proposals Italian Coordination
EvaluatedRetained for
FundingSuccess Rate Reserve List Number Acronym
NMBP-01-2016
Novel hybrid materials for heterogeneous
catalysis
25 9 36,0% 0 2
MULTI2HYCAT
BUSYCAT
NMBP-02-2016
Advanced Materials for Power Electronics based on
wide bandgap semiconductor devices technology
17 6 35,3% 0 2InRel-NPower
CHALLENGE
NMBP-03-2016
Innovative and sustainable materials solutions for the
substitution of critical raw materials in the electric power
system
37 12 32,4% 0 1 IMMENSA
NMBP-09-2016
Biomaterials for diagnosis and treatment of
demyelination disorders of the Central Nervous
System
17 8 47,1% 0 2
NANO T-FACTORY
PIEZOTREND
NMBP-10-2016
Nanoformulation of biologicals60 8 13,3% 0 1 CUPIDO
NMBP-17-2016
Advanced materials solutions and architectures for
high efficiency solar energy harvesting42 13 31,0% 0 1 NEXTOWER
NMBP-18-2016
Advanced materials enabling the integration of
storage technologies in the electricity grid 4 3 75,0% 0 0 0
NMBP-23-2016
Advancing the integration of Materials Modelling in
Business Processes to enhance effective industrial
decision making and increase competitiveness
9 4 44,4% 0 1 MatMod4Biz
NMBP-26-2016
Analytical techniques and tools in support of
nanomaterial risk assessment
16 5 31,3% 0 1 IDnano
IT Coordinators: 11/68 1° stage score ≥ 8,0
41
5 topics (RIA)
114 eligible proposals
Call budget 78.8 M€
Requested EC funding 563.9 M€
Average size 5.4 M€
36 invited to 2nd stage (35%)
Requesting 205.3 M€
Overall threshold = 8
NMBP topics (materials/modelling/risk assessment)
Overview
42
NMBP topics (materials/modelling/risk assessment)
Invited to 2nd stage proposals
26%
21%28%
8%
17%
NMBP-01-20169 projects
NMBP-02-20166 projects
NMBP-03-201612 projects
NMBP-23-20164 projects
NMBP-26-20165 projects
2 IT Coordination1 IT Coordination
NMBP-01-2016: Novel hybrid materials for heterogeneous catalysis
NMBP-02-2016: Advanced Materials for Power Electronics based on wide bandgap semiconductor devices technology
NMBP-03-2016: Innovative and sustainable materials solutions for the substitution of critical raw materials in the electric power system
NMBP-23-2016: Advancing the integration of Materials Modelling in Business Processes to enhance effective industrial decision making
and increase competitiveness
NMBP-26-2016: Analytical techniques and tools in support of nanomaterial risk assessment
2 IT Coordination
1 IT Coordination
1 IT Coordination
7/36 (19,4%) IT Coordination
43
NMBP topics (materials/modelling/risk assessment)
Invited to 2nd stage proposals - Country
14
24
0 0
6
64
10
0
8
48
6
38
02
12
41
03
0 0
14
02
0
14
41
47
35
1
17
1
17
1 2 35
AT…
BE
BG CY
CZ
DE
DK EE EL ES FI FR HR
HU IE IT LT LU LV MT
NL
PL
PT
RO SE SI SK UK IL
…
NO CA
…
CH
CN JP KR
MX
RU US
Number of participants
44
NMBP topics (healthcare)
Overview
2 topics (RIA)
77 eligible proposals
Call budget 32 M€
Requested EC funding 444.8 M€
Average size 5.7 M€
16 invited to 2nd stage (21%)
requesting 97.7 M€
Overall threshold = 8
45
NMBP topics (healthcare)
Invited to 2nd stage proposals
53%47%
NMBP-09-20168 projects
NMBP-10-20168 projects
1 IT Coordination
2 IT Coordination
3/16 (19%) IT Coordination
NMBP-09-2016: Biomaterials for diagnosis and treatment of demyelination disorders of the Central Nervous
System
NMBP-10-2016: Nanoformulation of biologicals
46
NMBP topics (healthcare)
Invited to 2nd stage proposals
2
11
0 0
4
27
20
2
21
1
14
02
8
19
01
0 0
8
10 0
21
0
30
32
02
AT…
BE
BG CY
CZ
DE
DK EE EL ES FI FR HR
HU IE IT LT LU LV MT
NL
PL
PT
RO SE SI SK UK IL
…N
O TR CH
…
Number of participants
47
NMBP topics (energy)
Overview
2 topics (IA)
46 eligible proposals
Call budget 32 M€
Requested EC funding 218.8 M€
Average size 4.8 M€
16 invited to 2nd stage (35%)
Requesting 78.3 M€
Overall threshold = 8
48
NMBP topics (energy)
Invited to 2nd stage proposals
75%
25%
NMBP-17-2016
13
NMBP-18-2016
3
1 IT Coordination
NMBP 17-2016Advanced materials solutions and architectures for
high efficiency solar energy harvesting IA
4,target 6
1st Stage:
8/12/15
2nd
Stage:24/5/16NMBP 18-2016Advanced materials enabling the integration of
storage technologies in the electricity grid IA
5,target 6
1/6 (17%) IT Coordination
49
NMBP topics (energy)
Invited to 2nd stage proposals
0
11
0 01
16
5
0 0
28
4
19
0 01
15
10 0 0
10
1
4
0
6
12
10
1
42 2
13
AT…
BE
BG CY
CZ
DE
DK EE EL ES FI FR HR
HU IE IT LT LU LV MT
NL
PL
PT
RO SE SI SK UK IL
…N
O TR CA
…C
H
Number of participants
50
BIOTEC-02-2016 (2 stages) Bioconversion of non-agricultural waste into biomolecules for
industrial applications
BIOTEC-03-2016 (2 stages) Microbial chassis platforms with optimized metabolic pathways
for industrial innovations through systems biology
2 topics (RIA)
79 eligible proposals
Call budget 32 M€
Requested EC funding 480 M€
Average size 6.3 M€
17 invited to 2nd stage (22%)
Requesting 102 M€
Overall threshold = 8,5
Two stage:
1° STAGE 8/12/2015
2° STAGE 24/5/2016
BIOTEC topics
1° stage BIOTEC 2016
(preliminary results)
IT Coordinators: 3/17
IT Participants: 25/209 - circa 12% 1° stage score ≥ 8,5
Topic Code
Number of Proposals Italian Coordination
Evaluated %Retained for
Funding%
Success
RateReserve List Number Acronym
BIOTEC-02-2016
Bioconversion of non-
agricultural waste into
biomolecules for
industrial applications
47 61,8% 10 58,8% 21,3% 0 3
COFFEE BREAK
BioLC-Tech
MADELINE
BIOTEC-03-2016
Microbial chassis
platforms with optimized
metabolic pathways for
industrial innovations
through systems biology
29 38,2% 7 41,2% 24,1% 0 0 0
52
BIOTEC topicsInvited to 2nd stage proposals
58%
42%
BIOTEC-02-201610 projects
BIOTEC-03-20167 projects
3 Coordinanti IT
53
6
25
0 0
5
27
8
0
7
20
4
10
0 02
25
1 10 0
11
0
15
2
6
20
15
13
2
7
31
AT
BE
BG CY
CZ
DE
DK EE EL ES FI FR HR
HU IE IT LT LU LV MT
NL
PL
PT
RO SE SI SK UK IL
NO TR CH IS US
1 3 4
Number of participants
BIOTEC-02-2016
BIOTEC-03-2016Invited to 2nd stage proposals
54
PILOTS-01-2016 Pilot lines for manufacturing of materials with customized
thermal/electrical conductivity properties
PILOTS-02-2016 Pilot lines manufacturing of nanostructured antimicrobial
surfaces using advanced nanosurface functionalization technologies
Overview
2 topics (IA)
15 eligible proposals
Overall thresholds: 96 M€ (=8.5/10)
GO proposals: 15 (101.3 M€)
Overall threshold = 8,5
Available budget: 32 M€
59 received proposals requesting 387 M€
Average size: 6.6 M€
PILOTS topicsInvited to 2nd stage proposals
1° stage PILOT 2016
(preliminary results)
Topic Code
Number of Proposals Italian Coordination
Evaluated %Retained for
Funding%
Success
Rate
Reserve
ListNumber Acronym
PILOTS-01-2016 27 45,8% 8 53,3% 29,6% 0 0 0
PILOTS-02-2016 32 54,2% 7 46,7% 21,9% 0 721005 PILATEX
TOTAL 59 100,0% 15 100,0% 25,4% 0 1 1
HORIZON 2020 – WORK PROGRAMME 2016-2017 - General Annexes – ANNEX H
For the evaluation of first-stage proposals under a two-stage submission procedure, only the criteria
‘excellence’ and ‘impact’ will be evaluated. Within these criteria, only the aspects in bold will be considered.
The threshold for both individual criteria will be 4. The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the two
individual scores, will be set at the level such that the total requested budget of proposals admitted to
stage 2 is as close as possible to three times the available budget. The actual level will therefore
depend on the volume of proposals received. The threshold is expected to normally be set at 8 or 8.5.
IT Coordinators: 1/ 15
Final score: 8,5 – 9,5
56
PILOTS topicsInvited to 2nd stage proposals
53%47%
PILOTS-01-20168 projects
PILOTS-02-20167 projects
1 IT Coordinantor
57
PILOTS topicsInvited to 2nd stage proposals
65
0 0
3
21
11
0 0
27
7
20
0 0
3
15
0 0 0 0
10
3
5
0
5
10
25
9
3
6
1
AT…
BE
BG CY
CZ
DE
DK EE EL ES FI FR HR
HU IE IT LT LU LV MT
NL
PL
PT
RO SE SI SK UK IL
…
NO CH
…
RU
Number of participants
Foresight and stakeholder consultation
(Advisory Groups)
Consultation Member States
Strategic Priorities
Development and adoption of work
programme
01-06/2016 04-09/2016 10/2016 11/2016…
TOWARDS THE NMBP WP 2018-2020
Joint Research Center (JRC)
Excellent Science
European Research Council
Frontier research by the best individual teams
Future and Emerging Technologies
Collaborative research to open new fields of innovation
Marie Skłodowska Curie actions
Opportunities for training and career development
Research infrastructures (including e-infrastructure)
Ensuring access to world-class facilities
Societal Challenges
Health, demographic change and wellbeing
Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine and maritime research & the bioeconomy
Secure, clean and efficient energy
Smart, green and integrated transport
Climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials
Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies
Security society
European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)
Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation
Science with and for society
59
Industrial Leadership
Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies
ICT,
NANOTECHNOLOGIES,
MATERIALS, BIOTECHNOLOGY, MANUFACTURING, space
Access to risk finance
Leveraging private finance and venture capital for research and innovation
Innovation in SMEs
Fostering all forms of innovation in all types of SMEsLEIT – NMBP
Nanotechnologies, Advanced Materials, Biotechnology and Advanced
Manufacturing and Processing
H2020 structure
WORK PROGRAMME NMPB - Nanotechnologies, Advanced Materials, Biotechnology and Advanced Manufacturing and Processing
Calls
2016/2017
60
NANOTECHNOLOGIES,
ADVANCED MATERIALS
AND PRODUCTION
PILOTS
BIOTECHNO-LOGIES
FACTORIESOF THE FUTURE
SPIREENERGY-EFFICIENT
BUILDINGS
http://ec.europa.eu/research
/participants/data/ref/h2020/
wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-
wp1617-leit-nmp_en.pdf
http://ec.europa.eu/research
/participants/data/ref/h2020/
wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-
wp1617-focus_en.pdf
WP NMBP 2016-17
61
• Final version soon available (2017): http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/funding/reference_docs.html#h2020-work-programmes-2016-17
• LEIT-NMBP part, including EeB call and main NMBP call (+ BIO)
• Cross-Cutting part , including PILOTS, Factories of the Future (FoF), and Sustainable Process Industries (SPIRE)
(Focus Area 'Industry 2020 in the Circular Economy')
• Publication: July 2016
• Deadlines:
• NMBP two-stage: 27 Oct 2016/ 04 May 2017
• PILOTS (two-stage): 27 Oct 2016/ 04 May 2017
• EeB, FoF, SPIRE: 19 Jan 2017
• NMBP CSAs, ERA-NETs, NMBP-08: 19 Jan 2017
WP NMBP 2017
62
• Budgets:
• NMBP: 254,39M€ (incl. BIOTEC, CSAs, ERA-NETs)
• EeB: 54M€
• PILOTS: 48M€
• FoF: 85M€ (+ 33 M€ for ICT topics)
• SPIRE: 80M€
• Types of action
• RIA: Research and innovation actions (100% funding)
• IA: Innovation actions (70% funding for profit-making partners)
• CSA: Coordination and support actions
• ERA-NET Co-fund: to support public-public partnerships
50
0 M
€
WP approach
63
• A strong challenge-based approach, allowing applicants to have considerable freedom to come up with innovative solutions
• Simplified list of possible types of action (e.g. research and innovation at 100%; innovation actions at 70%,…)
• Strong emphasis on expected impact, less prescription
• Cross-cutting issues mainstreamed (e.g. social sciences, gender, international co-operation…)
• Work programmes with 2-year duration
IMPACT in NMBP WP
64
• Impact for most topics is to be demonstrated by Business cases and exploitation strategies for industrialisation(outlined in LEIT Introduction)
• Should be realistic and credible
• Exploitation strategies are to be developed further during projects
• In NMBP calls, the impact criterion is always the first criterion used to resolve proposals with equal overall scores
• For IAs, the impact criterion is weighed by 1.5
65
NANOTECHNOLOGIES, ADVANCED MATERIALS, BIOTECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTIONhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-leit-nmp_en.pdf
ENERGY-EFFICIENT BUILDINGS
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2016
EEB-01-2016 Highly efficient insulation materials with improved properties IA 5-7
21/1/16
EEB-02-2016Performance indicators and monitoring techniques for energy-efficiency and environmental quality at building and district level
CSA
EEB-03-2016Integration of advanced technologies for heating and cooling at building and district level
IA 5-7
EEB-04-2016New technologies and strategies for the development of pre-fabricated elements through the reuse and recycling of construction materials and structures
RIA 4-6
2017
EEB-05-2017Development of near zero energy building renovation
IA 5-7
19/1/17
EEB-06-2017
Highly efficient hybrid storage solutions for power and heat in residential buildings and district areas, balancing the supply and demand conditions
RIA 4-6
EEB-07-2017Integration of energy harvesting at building and district level
IA 5-7
EEB-08-2017New business models for energy-efficient buildings through adaptable refurbishment solutions
CSA
ADVANCED MATERIALS AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES FOR HIGH ADDED VALUE PRODUCTS AND PROCESS INDUSTRIES
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2016
NMBP 01-2016 Novel hybrid materials for heterogeneous catalysis RIA 3-5
1st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage: 24/5/16
NMBP 02-2016Advanced Materials for Power Electronics based on wide bandgap semiconductor devices technology
RIA 4-6
NMBP 03-2016Innovative and sustainable materials solutions for the substitution of critical raw materials in the electric power system
RIA 3-5
2017
NMBP 04-2017
Architectured /Advanced material concepts for intelligent bulk material structures
RIA 4-6
1st Stage: 27/10/162nd Stage:
4/5/17
NMBP 05-2017
Advanced materials and innovative design for improved functionality and aesthetics in high added value consumer goods
IA4-6,
target 7
NMBP 06-2017
Improved material durability in buildings and infrastructures, including offshore
RIA 4-6
NMBP 07-2017
Systems of materials characterisation for model, product and process optimisation
RIA 4-6
ADVANCED MATERIALS AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES FOR HEALTHCARE
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2016
NMBP 09-2016Biomaterials for diagnosis and treatment of demyelination disorders of the Central Nervous System
RIA3, target
51st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage:24/5/16
NMBP 10-2016 Nanoformulation of biologicals RIA 3/4-5/6
NMBP 11-2016 ERA-NET on NanomedicineERA-NET cofund
21/1/16
2017
NMBP 12-2017
Development of a reliable methodology for better risk management of engineered biomaterials in Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products and/or Medical Devices
RIA4,
target 6
1st Stage: 27/10/16
2nd Stage: 4/5/17
NMBP 13-2017
Cross-cutting KETs for diagnostics at the point-of-care
RIA3/4-5/6
19/1/17
NMBP 14-2017
Regulatory Science Framework for assessment of risk benefit ratio of Nanomedicines and Biomaterials
IA 5-61st Stage: 27/10/16
2nd Stage: 4/5/17
NMBP 15-2017
Nanotechnologies for imaging cellular transplants and regenerative processes in vivo
RIA3/4-5/6
1st Stage: 27/10/16
2nd Stage: 4/5/17
NMBP 16-2017
Mobilising the European nano-biomedical ecosystem
CSA 19/1/17
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2016 NMBP-08-2016Affordable weight reduction of high-volume vehicles and components taking into account the entire life-cycle
RIA 4-6 21/1/16
GREEN VEHICLES
ADVANCED MATERIALS AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY APPLICATIONS
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2016NMBP 17-2016
Advanced materials solutions and architectures for high efficiency solar energy harvesting
IA4,
target 6 1st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage:24/5/16
NMBP 18-2016Advanced materials enabling the integration of storage technologies in the electricity grid
IA5,
target 6
2017
NMBP 19-2017
Cost-effective materials for “power-to-chemical” technologies
IA3,
target 5
1st Stage: 27/10/16
2nd Stage: 4/5/17
NMBP 20-2017
High-performance materials for optimizing carbon dioxide capture
IA5,
Target 6
BIOTECHNOLOGY
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2016
BIOTEC-01-2016
ERA-NET Cofund on BiotechnologiesERA-NET Cofund
3-6 21/1/16
BIOTEC-02-2016
Bioconversion of non-agricultural waste into biomolecules for industrial applications
RIA 3-51st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage: 24/5/16BIOTEC-03-
2016Microbial chassis platforms with optimized metabolic pathways for industrial innovations through systems biology
RIA 3-5
BIOTEC-04-2016
KET Biotechnology foresight identifying gaps and high-value opportunities for the EU industry
CSA 21/1/16
2017
BIOTEC-05-2017
Microbial platforms for CO2-reuse processes in the low-carbon economy
RIA 3-5
1st Stage: 27/10/162nd Stage:
4/5/17
BIOTEC-06-2017
Optimisation of biocatalysis and downstream processing for the sustainable production of high value-added platform chemicals
IA 5-7
BIOTEC-07-2017
New Plant Breeding Techniques (NPBT) in molecular farming: Multipurpose crops for industrial bioproducts
RIA 3-5
BIOTEC-08-2017
Support for enhancing and demonstrating the impact of KET Biotechnology projects
CSA 19/1/17
MODELLING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NANOTECHNOLOGIES AND ADVANCED MATERIALS
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2016
NMBP-23-2016Advancing the integration of Materials Modelling in Business Processes to enhance effective industrial decision making and increase competitiveness
RIA 51st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage:24/5/16
NMBP-24-2016Network to capitalise on strong European position in materials modelling and to allow industry to reap the benefits
CSA 21/1/16
2017NMBP-25-2017
Next generation system integrating tangible and intangible materials model components to support innovation in industry
IA 6
1st Stage: 27/10/162nd Stage:
4/5/17
SCIENCE-BASED RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF NANOTECHNOLOGIES, ADVANCED MATERIALS AND BIOTECHNOLOGIES
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2016
NMBP-26-2016Analytical techniques and tools in support of nanomaterial risk assessment
RIA 5-61st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage:24/5/16
NMBP-27-2016Promoting safe innovation through global consolidation and networking of nanosafety centres and strengthening the European industry through cooperation in nanosafety
CSA 21/1/16
2017
NMBP-28-2017
Framework and strategies for nanomaterial characterisation, classification, grouping and read-across for risk analysis
RIA 5-7 1st Stage:27/10/162nd Stage:
4/5/17NMBP-29-2017
Advanced and realistic models and assays for nanomaterial hazard assessment
RIA 4-6
INNOVATIVE AND RESPONSIBLE GOVERNANCE OF NEWAND CONVERGING ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2016
NMBP-30-2016Facilitating knowledge management, networking and coordination in the field of formulated products
CSA
21/1/16
NMBP-31-2016 Presidency events CSA
NMBP-32-2016 Support for National Contact Points CSA
NMBP-33-2016Networking and sharing best experiences in using regional clusters strategies with a focus on supporting innovation in the NMBP thematic area
CSA
NMBP-36-2016 Policy support for Industry 2020 in the circular economy CSA
2017
NMBP-31-2017
Presidency events CSA 19/1/17
NMBP-34-2017
Governing innovation of nanotechnology through enhanced societal engagement
CSA 19/1/17
NMBP-35-2017
Innovative solutions for the conservation of 20th century cultural heritage
RIA4,
target 6
1st Stage: 27/10/162nd Stage:
4/5/17
SME INSTRUMENT
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument
2016 2017
SMEInst-02-2016-2017
Accelerating the uptake of nanotechnologies advanced materials or advanced manufacturing and processing technologies by SMEs
SMEInst
20162017
SMEInst-03-2016-2017
Dedicated support to biotechnology SMEs closing the gap from lab to market
SMEInst
INDUSTRY 2020 IN THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY
CROSS-CUTTING CALL
PILOTS
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2016
PILOTS-01-2016
Pilot lines for manufacturing of materials with customized thermal/electrical conductivity properties
IA4/6,
target 71st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage: 24/5/16PILOTS-02-
2016
Pilot Line Manufacturing of Nanostructured Antimicrobial Surfaces using Advanced Nanosurface Functionalization Technologies
IA4/6,
target 7
2017
PILOTS-03-2017
Pilot Lines for Manufacturing of Nanotextured surfaces with mechanically enhanced properties
IA4/6,
target 7 1st Stage:
27/10/162nd Stage:
4/5/17
PILOTS-04-2017
Pilot Lines for 3D printed and/or injection moulded polymeric or ceramic microfluidic MEMS
IA4/6,
target 7
PILOTS-05-2017
Paper-based electronics RIA3,
target 5
FACTORIES OF THE FUTURE – FOF (2016)
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2016
FOF-01-2016Novel hybrid approaches for additive and subtractive manufacturing machines
RIA 4-6
21/1/16
FOF-02-2016Machinery and robot systems in dynamic shop floor environments using novel embedded cognitive functions
IA 5-7
FOF-03-2016Zero-defect strategies at system level for multi-stage manufacturing in production lines
IA 5-7
FOF-04-2016Continuous adaptation of work environments with changing levels of automation in evolving production systems
RIA 4-6
FOF-05-2016Support for the further development of Additive Manufacturing technologies in Europe
CSA
FACTORIES OF THE FUTURE – FOF (2017)Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2017
FOF-06-2017New product functionalities through advanced surface manufacturing processes for mass production
RIA 4-6
19/1/17
FOF-07-2017Integration of unconventional technologies for multi-material processing into manufacturing systems
RIA 4-6
FOF-08-2017In-line measurement and control for micro-/nano-enabled high-volume manufacturing for enhanced reliability
IA 5-7
FOF-09-2017Novel design and predictive maintenance technologies for increased operating life of production systems
IA 5-7
FOF-10-2017New technologies and life cycle management for reconfigurable and reusable customised products
IA 5-7
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2016 FOF-11-2016 Digital automation RIA, CSA 21/1/16
2017 FOF-12-2017 ICT Innovation for Manufacturing SMEs (I4MS) RIA, CSA 19/1/17
2016 FOF-13-2016 Photonics Laser-based production RIA, IA 21/1/16
ICT for FACTORIES OF THE FUTURE
SUSTAINABLE PROCESS INDUSTRIES – SPIRE (2016)
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2016
SPIRE-01-2016Systematic approaches for resource-efficient water management systems in process industries
IA 5-7
21/1/16
SPIRE-02-2016Plant-wide monitoring and control of data-intensive processes
RIA 4-6
SPIRE-03-2016Industrial technologies for the valorisation of European bio-resources into high added value process streams
IA 5-7
SPIRE-04-2016Industrial furnace design addressing energy efficiency in new and existing furnaces
RIA 4-6
SPIRE-05-2016Potential use of carbon dioxide / carbon monoxide and non-conventional fossil natural resources in Europe as feedstock for the process industry
CSA
SPIRE-06-2016Business models for flexible and delocalised approaches for intensified processing
CSA
SUSTAINABLE PROCESS INDUSTRIES – SPIRE (2017)
Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline
2017
SPIRE-07-2017Integrated approach to process optimisation for raw material resources efficiency, excluding recovery technologies of waste streams
IA 5-7
19/1/17
SPIRE-08-2017Carbon dioxide utilisation to produce added value chemicals
RIA 4-6
SPIRE-09-2017Pilot lines based on more flexible and down-scaled high performance processing
IA 5-7
SPIRE-10-2017New electrochemical solutions for industrial processing, which contribute to a reduction of carbon dioxide emissions
RIA 4-6
SPIRE-11-2017Support for the enhancement of the impact of SPIRE PPP projects
CSA
SPIRE-12-2017Assessment of standardisation needs and ways to overcome regulatory bottlenecks in the process industry
CSA
TIPOLOGIE DI AZIONI
81 81
TIPOLOGIE AZIONI
CSA
Co
–Fu
nd
(+)I
nn
ova
zio
ne
Ric
erca
co
llab
ora
tiva
Research and innovationaction
Innovationaction
Strumento PMI
Eranet
Pre –commercial procurement
(PCP)
PubblicProcurementof Innovative solution (PPI)
Coordinationand SupportAction
Prize
SME Instrument
Fast track to innovation
82
Progetti collaborativi
Basic research, appliedresearch, technologydevelopment and integration, and testing e validation on a small scale prototype in a laboratory or simulated environment
Funding rate: 100% costi diretti, 25% costi indiretti
R&I actions
Prototyping, testing, demostrating, piloting, large - scale productvalidation and market replication
Funding Rate: 70% costi diretti (100% no profit); 25% costi indiretti
a. Demostration or pilot
b. Market replication
I actions
83
84
85
Work Programme TOPICSStructure
• sets the context, the problem to be addressed, why intervention is necessary
SPECIFIC CHALLENGE
• delineates the problem, specifies the focus and the boundaries of the potential action BUT without describing specific approaches
SCOPE
• describe the key elements of what is expected to be achieved in relation to the specific challenge
EXPECTED IMPACT
87
TOPIC NMPExamples
ELIGIBILITY & MINIMUM PARTICIPATION CONDITIONS
88 88
WHO CAN PARTICIPATE? Any legal entity , university or research
centre based in EU member or associated *countries
JRC (Joint Research Centre)
International organization of EU interest
International organization and entitiesfrom Third Countries: in addition to minimum conditions!
* Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, FYR Macedonia, Iceland, Israel, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Norway, Serbia, Turkey
WHO CAN GET FUNDED? Any legal entity , university or research
centre based in EU member or associated *countries
JRC (Joint Research Centre)
International organization of EU interest
Entities from Third Countries: only ifICPC*
International organization and entitiesfrom Third countris not ICPC, only inexceptional cases ,if foreseeen in the WPor on the basis of bilateral-agreementor ifit is essential for the action
POSSIBILITY OF JOINT CALL WITH THIRD COUNTRIES AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION
ELIGIBILITY FOR FUNDING
• Automatically for the following legal entities:
• Legal entities established in the Member States and
• International European Interest Organisations
• Legal entities identified in the work programmes
• Other legal entities if:
• Participation is deemed essential for carrying out the or the relevant funding body
• Provided for in an international agreement between the country or international organisation
THIRD COUNTRIES
• Industrialised countries and emerging economies - funded only in exceptional cases
• industrialised countries: for instance US, Canada, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Australia, Taiwan, New Zealand, Macao, San Marino, Monaco, Andorra, Vatican, etc.
• emerging economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China and Mexico
• ICPC Countries, Automatically funded
MINIMUM CONDITIONS FOR PARTICIPATION
• Three legal entities. Each of the three shall be established in a different Member State or associated country. All three legal entities shall be independent of each other.• Research & innovation action• Innovation action• ERA-NET Cofund• Pre-commercial procurement (PCP) Cofund• Public procurement of Innovative solutions (PPI) Cofund
(ONE FOR CSA)
EVALUATION CRITERIA
93 93
Cri
teri
o 1 Eccellenza
Cri
teri
o 2 Impatto
Cri
teri
o 3 Qualità e
efficienza dell’attuazione
CRITERI DI VALUTAZIONE
PROCEDURA DI PRESENTAZIONE A DUE STEP: SOLO ECCELLENZA E IMPATTO
(THRESHOLD DINAMICO)
LIMITE PAGINA PROPOSTA 1ST STAGE: 10 PP (PARTNER DA INCLUDERE NEL FORM A E NON NELLA COVER PAGE PARTE B)
LIMITE PAGINE 2ND STAGE: 70 PP + SECTION4 CONSORTIUM E ETICA/SICUREZZA
AWARD CRITERIA RESEARCH AND INNOVATION ACTIONS; INNOVATION ACTIONS; SME INSTRUMENTEX
CEL
LEN
CE Clarity and pertinence of the objectives;
Soundness of the concept, and credibility of the proposedmethodology;
Extent that the proposed work is beyond the state of the art, and demonstrates innovation potential (e.g. ground-breaking objectives, novel concepts and approaches, new products, services or business and organisational models)
Appropriate consideration of interdisciplinary approaches and, where relevant, use of stakeholder knowledge.
IMPA
CT
The extent to which the outputs of the project wouldcontribute to each of the expected impacts mentioned in the workprogramme under the relevant topic;
Any substantial impacts not mentioned in the work programme, that would enhance innovation capacity, create new market opportunities, strengthen competitiveness and growth of companies, address issues related to climate change or the environment, or bring other important benefits for society;;
Quality of the proposed measures to:
1) Exploit and disseminate the project results (including management of IPR), and to manage research data where relevant.
2)Communicate the project activities to different target audiences
AWARD CRITERIA RESEARCH AND INNOVATION ACTIONS; INNOVATION ACTIONS; SME INSTRUMENT
QU
ALI
TY A
ND
EF
FIC
IEN
CY
OF
IMP
LEM
ENTA
TIO
N Quality and effectiveness of the work plan, including
extent to which the resources assigned to work packagesare in line with their objectives deliverables;
Appropriateness of the management structures and procedures, including risk and innovation management;
Appropriateness of the allocation of tasks, ensuring that all participants have a valid role and adequate resources in the fulfil that role.
Complementarity of the participants and extent to which the consortium as whole brings together the necessary expertise;
AWARD CRITERIA RESEARCH AND INNOVATION ACTIONS; INNOVATION ACTIONS; SME INSTRUMENT
HORIZONTAL ISSUES
98 98
Open Research
Data
Embedding SSH
Standards ARIAT
OPEN RESEARCH DATA• Open research data: A novelty in Horizon 2020 is the Pilot on
Open Research Data which aims to improve and maximise access to and re-use of research data generated by projects. Projects funded under topics NMBP-23 to NMBP-29 inclusive, on modelling and nanotechnology safety, will by default participate in the Pilot on Open Research Data in Horizon 2020.
• Projects have the possibility to opt out of the Pilot, provided a justification is given for doing so. Participation in the Pilot is not taken into account during the evaluation procedure. Proposals will not be evaluated favourably because they are part of the Pilot and will not be penalised for opting out of the Pilot.
SSH in Horizon 2020
100
COMPLEX
SOCIETAL
ISSUES
STEM disciplines (science, technology,
engineering and mathematics)
EMBEDDING SSH
solutions and products that are socially
acceptable, directly applicable or
marketable and cost-effective
SSH disciplines (social sciences and
humanities)
102
SSH aspects in LEITBackground: competitiveness as overallgoal, mainly technological approach, SSH is not everywhere
SSH aspects include mainly:
• User behaviour and acceptance
• Management and governance issues
• Risk assessment and management
• Development of business models
But also: Strengthening cultural and social aspects of innovations;
SSH as a source of creativity for developing new products /services
LEITLeadership in enabling and
industrial technologies
ICT, Nanotechnologies,
Materials, Biotechnology,
Manufacturing, Space
103
Human-technology-interaction, user perspectives, data protection
Societal needs, user acceptance, risk assessment, governance
Development of new business models, responsible consumer behaviour
New, sustainable business models
ICT
Nanotechnologies Biotechnology
Advanced Materials
Manufacturing
Space
?
Topic flagged
104
LEIT-NMB BIOTEC-01-2016 SSH
LEIT-NMB BIOTEC-04-2016 SSH
LEIT-NMB BIOTEC-05-2017 SSH
LEIT-NMB BIOTEC-07-2017 SSH
LEIT-NMB NMBP-30-2016 SSH
LEIT-NMB NMBP-31-2016 SSH
LEIT-NMB NMBP-31-2017 SSH
LEIT-NMB NMBP-32-2016 SSH
LEIT-NMB NMBP-33-2016 SSH
LEIT-NMB NMBP-34-2017 SSH
LEIT-NMB NMBP-35-2017 SSH
history
economics
administration
political science
philosophy
linguistics
theology
law
sociology
psychology
anthropology
cultural studies
communication
demography
education
ethics
SSH DISCIPLINES
Standards:both in Excellence and Impact
Standardisation issues have to be taken into account where appropriate
Proposals should focus on the development of new regulatory standards and tools that are based on scientific principles that already have a Proof-of-Concept at the laboratory scale.
To improve standardisation of regulatory practice at
the European and international level;
More effective execution of activities of common interest, such as
IPR management, standardisation and policy making.
The project should aim at agreement with
the wide European scientific and industrial
community a standard for organizing
modeling data needed to make search and
linking between different databases
effective and easy.
ARIaT – Horizon 2020 Annotated Research and Innovation Actions Template
• Innovation dimension in Horizon 2020 proposals: set of good practices to understand and write innovation related issues both in Research and Innovation Actions (RIA) and Innovation Actions (IA)
http://www.health2market.eu/results/h2020-
annotated-template
H2020 KEY Performance Indicators
https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/horizon-2020-indicators-assessing-results-and-impact-horizon
ESR EVALUATION SUMMARY REPORT (CALL 2014-2015 H2020)
PUNTI DEBOLEZZA E FORZA
109
ESR – debolezze: ECCELLENZA 1/2• Lack of credibility due to lack of details concerning the models to be
used.
• Limited overall ambition of the proposal/Innovation beyond the state-of-the-art is insufficiently developed.
• No clear evidence of innovation potential.
• No quantitative indicators for the proposed objectives.
• Specific objectives inconsistent with the target of the proposal.
• Objectives are not convincingly addressed, especially concerning the actual analysis of drivers of change and causalities.
• Lack of details on the mechanisms to implement some of the objectives.
• Some of the objectives are missing measurable targets to enable benchmarking of the project results against existing technologies
ESR – debolezze: ECCELLENZA 2/2
• The conceptual framework insufficiently elaborated.
• Disadvantages of the proposed approach are not considered enough in the proposal.
• Targeted TRL values are not consistent.
• The linkage with other on-going activities is provided. However the description on how to effectively build upon the achieved results and to cooperate with them is minimal.
• A clear sequence of coordination and support measures is outlined, even if these could have been presented in a more diagrammatic manner.
• The proposal could have developed the gender issues more clearly.
ESR – best practices: ECCELLENZA
• Strutturare chiaramente gli obiettivi (anche con l’aiuto di grafici), che siano rilevanti rispetto alla call e misurabili.
• Costruire su progetti EU in atto o conclusi.
• Descrivere I concetti base e le diverse componenti tecnologiche del progetto in maniera esaustiva ed organica in tutta la proposta.
• Stabilire un equilibrio credibile tra ricerca, dimostrazione e first market replication action (laddove applicabile).
• Interdisciplinarietà: combinare efficacemente diversi domini di expertise.
• Adottare un approccio interdisciplinare che includa per esempio ‘policy development, citizen science, data interoperability and capacity building’. Non trascurare end-users e/o technology transfer providers!
• Adottare una metodologia che si basi su un approccio step by step.
ESR – debolezze: IMPATTO 1/2• No significant environmental and social impacts beyond the call
targets.
• Not quantified impact/clear justification of the forecasts on impacts is missing.
• Provided numbers are not fully convincing, as supporting facts are missing.
• Enhanced citizen awareness and participation mentioned but not sufficiently developed.
• Little discussion about how the new knowledge produced by the project will be integrated to available data sets, and used in broader scale models.
• Insufficient/standard communication measures.
ESR – debolezze: IMPATTO 2/2
• In the dissemination strategy a clear targeted strategy to reach different stakeholders‘ groups is not well mentioned.
• The performance indicators for dissemination are not ambitious.
• The possibility to set up training workshops towards end users as a way to decrease the barrier for adoption of the project results is not considered enough.
• Ability to effectively replicate the concept and technology throughout Europe is not evident.
• Exploitation plan is absent/partial or vague.
• Lack of details on IPR management.
ESR – best practices: IMPATTO 1/3
• Descrivere gli impatti attesi in una tavola sinottica.
• Definire una exploitation strategy che contenga 4 elementi fondamentali: • analisi del mercato (e possibile impatto sullo stesso),
• management della proprietà intellettuale,
• innovation management
• business plan
• Non trascurare gli aspetti della standardizzazione (e.g. attraverso link con il CEN/CENELEC)
• Creare una connessione tra le azioni di disseminazione e di exploitation al fine di operare in vista di una futura commercializzazione del prodotto/servizio oggetto della proposta (a tal fine, eventualmente sviluppare una SWOT analisys).
ESR – best practices: IMPATTO 2/3
• Laddove rilevante (principalmente IA NMBP), prevedere un business case preliminare che mostri i vantaggi in termini di costi del prodotto/servizio oggetto della proposta.
• Trattare esaustivamente gli aspetti dell’IPR e dei diritti di accesso per lo sfruttamento commerciale.
• Sviluppare misure di disseminazione e comunicazione modellate sulle esigenze dei vari target groups.
• Laddove possibile, promuovere il coinvolgimento della società civile (e.g. attraverso la citizen science).
• Prevedere il coinvolgimento degli attori impegnati nel policy e decision making.
ESR – best practices: IMPATTO 3/3
• Coinvolgere direttamente PMI e centri di ricerca privati così che possano direttamente beneficiare dei risultati del progetto, generando nuova innovazione. Le potenzialità di sfruttamento in questo senso sono indice della futura capacità del progetto di generare opportunità di lavoro e benessere economico.
• Stabilire meccanismi di valutazione dell’efficacia delle misure di comunicazione lungo che operino durante tutto l’arco del progetto al fine di garantirne l’efficacia.
• Strutturare le attività di comunicazione e disseminazione in modo da permettere la validazione dei risultati del progetto da parte degli utilizzatori finali, massimizzado così il loro potenziale. Stabilire meccanismi che consentano agli end-user di dare il proprio feedback sul progetto.
• Fare un uso proattivo e mirato dei social media.
ESR – debolezze: IMPLEMENTAZIONE 1/3
• Workpackages do not build into a coherent approach.
• The logical flow of the work plan is not appropriate to the core objective of the proposal.
• The work plan is overloaded as well as tasks and deliverableslists./WPs’ and tasks’ overlap.
• The content of the work plan is unequal in the level of detailsprovided.
• Discrepancies between work packages, tasks and person months.
• The share of technical/research activities versus networking and dissemination ones and viceversa is sometimes imbalancedcomparing with the type of action considered.
• The allocation of person months for the project is overestimated.
ESR – debolezze: IMPLEMENTAZIONE 2/3
• More public deliverables needed.
• Deliverables defined are limited to reports (e.g. demonstrator deliverables, both for technical demonstrations and for first market exploitation, are missing)
• Limited array of potential end-users included in the advisory board.
• Social scientists are insufficiently represented which raises questions as to the ability of the consortium partners in delivering the full range of expected impacts.
• Weak innovation management. It does not describe enough the potential impact of the project on the innovation capacity of every partner separately, nor is addressed the way new rising ideas will be handled during the project.
ESR – debolezze: IMPLEMENTAZIONE 3/3
• Poor risk management.
• The consortium does not provide a exhaustive geographical coverage.
• Only a minority of the staff in the project teams consists of women.
ESR – best practices: IMPLEMENTAZIONE 1/3
• Descrivere logicamente e distribuire le attività dei Work Packages coerentemente lungo la durata del progetto assicurando la loro corretta implementazione, coordinamento ed integrazione
• Dividere budget e person-months equamente tra partners.
• Costruire un consorzio multidisciplinare ed integrato che copra tutte le task del progetto in termini di expertise e di posizionamento sulla catena del valore.
• L’interdisciplinarietà del consorzio deve servire a prendere in considerazione non solo gli aspetti tecnici , ma anche gli aspetti legati alla società, normativa e mercato.
• Il coordinatore deve preferibilmente avere esperienza pregressa nel coordinamento.
ESR – best practices: IMPLEMENTAZIONE 1/3
• Valorizzare il ruolo delle PMI nel consorzio.li.
• Laddove possibile, coinvolgere le autorità locali
• Definire chiare struttura e procedura di management (e.g. che coinvolgano ‘steering committees’ , ‘End-users committee’, un ‘communication manager’).
• Descrivere esaustivamente rischi e azioni di mitigazione.
• Allocare le risorse economiche in maniera appropriata e ragionevole.
• Non trascurare gli aspetti di genere.
RESEARCH PARTICIPANT PORTALhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/home
123
GRAZIE PER L‘ATTENZIONE!
APREAgenzia per la Promozione della Ricerca Europea
via Cavour, 71 00184 - Roma
www.apre.itTel. (+39) 06-48939993
Fax. (+39) 06-48902550