ijspt-08-009

The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy | Volume 8, Number 1 | February 2013 | Page 9

ABSTRACTPurpose/Background: Cryotherapy is commonly used in physical therapy with many known benefits; however several investigations have reported decreased functional performance following therapeutic application thereof. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cryotherapy applied to the ankle on static and dynamic standing balance. It was hypothesized that balance would be decreased after cryotherapy application.

Methods: Twenty individuals (aged 18 to 40 years) participated in this research project. Each participant was tested under two conditions: an experimental condition where subjects received ice water immersion of the foot and ankle for 15 minutes immediately before balance testing and a control condition completed at room temperature. A Biodex® Balance System was used to quantify balance using anterior/posterior (AP), medial/lateral (ML), and overall balance indices. Paired t-tests were used to compare the balance indices for the two conditions with alpha set at 0.05 a priori. Effect size was also calculated to account for the multiple comparisons made.

Results: The static balance indices did not display statistically significant differences between the post-cryo-therapy and the control conditions with low effect sizes. Dynamic ML indices significantly increased follow-ing the cryotherapy application compared to the control exhibiting a moderate effect size indicating decreased balance following cryotherapy application. No differences were noted between experimental and control conditions for the dynamic AP or overall balance indices while a small effect size was noted for both.

Conclusions: The results suggest that cryotherapy to the ankle has a negative effect on the ML component of dynamic balance following ice water immersion.

Clinical Relevance: Immediate return to play following cryotherapy application is cautioned given the decreased dynamic ML balance and potential for increased injury risk.

Level of Evidence: 3b Case-control study

Key Words: Cryotherapy, functional performance, standing balance

IJSP

TORIGINAL RESEARCH

IMMEDIATE EFFECTS OF CRYOTHERAPY ON STATIC

AND DYNAMIC BALANCE

Matthew Douglas, DPT1

Serena Bivens, DPT1

Jennifer Pesterfi eld, DPT1

Nathan Clemson, DPT1

Whitney Castle, DPT1

Gisela Sole, BSc (Physio), MSc (Med), PhD2

Craig A. Wassinger, PT, PhD1

1 East Tennessee State University, Department of Physical Therapy, Johnson City, TN 37604

2 University of Otago, Centre for Physiotherapy Research, Dunedin, New Zealand

This project was funded internally.This project was approved by the Institutional Review Board at

ETSU.

CORRESPONDING AUTHORCraig WassingerPO Box 70624Johnson City, TN 37614E-mail: [email protected]


INTRODUCTIONCryotherapy is commonly used during rehabilitation as a treatment modality for acute and chronic inju-ries.1,2 The aims of cryotherapy interventions include pain reduction, inflammation control, and edema reduction.1-4 Despite the defined treatment benefits of cryotherapy, decreases in performance variables are likely if returning to activity immediately follow-ing cryotherapy treatments.5 Specifically, decreased muscle strength, vertical jump height, running speed, and agility measures have been noted following ice application across several anatomical areas and stud-ies.6-10 Ice treatment has also been shown to increase deficits in postural sway among individuals who have had previous lateral ankle sprains.11

Due to the mounting evidence that cryotherapy has deleterious immediate effects on functional activities, a further understanding of the possible impairments related to this commonly used treatment is warranted. Prior authors have reported decreased static standing balance following the effects of cryotherapy.8,11 How-ever, measures of dynamic standing balance may bet-ter represent the demands of the lower extremity during functional tasks and therefore may be a more appropriate assessment. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the role of cryotherapy via foot and ankle ice water immersion on static and dynamic standing balance. It was hypothesized that balance would decrease in both the static and dynamic conditions fol-lowing the cryotherapy application compared to the control condition. Findings from this study might assist clinicians in decision-making regarding the use of cryotherapy within a treatment session or when considering return to play after an athletic injury.

METHODSA single group repeated measures design was used under which each participant had their balance tested during two conditions: (1) an experimental condition where the subject received ice water immersion of the foot and ankle for 15 minutes immediately before balance testing and (2) a control condition completed at room temperature. The order of testing condition was randomized through a coin flip. Participants completing the control condition first immediately completed the experimental con-dition following assessment. Participants random-ized to the cryotherapy condition first had the control

session scheduled at a separate time to ensure no lingering effects existed from the cryotherapy procedures.

ParticipantsTwenty volunteer participants aged 18-40 without foot or ankle injury in the preceding six months, known cold sensitivities (such as Raynaud’s Dis-ease), and known balance or proprioceptive deficits participated in the study. All participants provided informed consent prior to participation as per East Tennessee State University guidelines.

Cryotherapy TreatmentThe foot and ankle of the dominant lower extremity was immersed in an ice water filled basin to a level at least five centimeters above the medial malleolus for fifteen minutes.12 The temperature of the water was monitored and adjusted (with additional ice) as needed to ensure the temperature remained below 4.4°C.

Balance TestingThe Biodex® Balance System (BBS) was used to mea-sure balance during static and dynamic conditions. During static conditions the BBS circular platform acts as a standard force plate thus allowing for static balance testing. Static results are reported as the angular displacement of the center of gravity as defined by the manufacturer. Dynamic balance test-ing was performed on the same platform that was unlocked to allow free movement simultaneously in both the medial/lateral (ML) and anterior/posterior (AP) directions. The platform allows varying levels of resistance to perturbation of movement ranging from 1 to 8 (8 being least restrictive) as set by the manufacturer. Rather than measuring the deviation of the center of gravity as done during static condi-tions, this device measures the degree of tilt about each axis during dynamic measurements.13 Utilizing this data, the BBS software quantifies balance indices for AP and ML stability, and overall stability (OA) based on tilt variance, whereby a large variance indi-cates reduced balance.13 Reliability of the BBS using this protocol has been previously calculated as r=.89 for AP, r=.93 for ML, and r=.92 for OA.14 Each partic-ipant completed a practice session for static and dynamic testing immediately prior to balance mea-surement.15 Static balance testing preceded dynamic


balance testing for all individuals. Following familiar-ization, three ten second trials, each separated by a 20 second rest period, were used to calculate the bal-ance indices for each participant. The average of the three measures was used for analysis. Dynamic bal-ance was measured using the same protocol as static balance testing with the BBS set to a dynamic posi-tion of 4 out of 8. This level was chosen as it was in the middle of the available levels of platform restric-tiveness. Testing was performed barefoot on the dominant lower extremity as determined by the Otago Footedness Inventory.16 All balance tests were completed with the participants’ hands on their hips and with eyes open. No visual feedback regarding the location of the center of gravity or tilt from the BBS computer screen was provided (Figure 1). Any trials in which the participants’ hands moved from their hips or the non-tested lower extremity touched down were deleted and repeated. Less than 20% of participants were required to repeat trials due to loss of balance.

Statistical AnalysesPaired t-tests were used to compare balance scores between the post ice water immersion and the con-trol condition. Alpha was set at 0.05 a priori. Effect size (ES) was computed utilizing the effect size index (mean balance difference /control standard devia-tion) to assist in determination of meaningfulness of change scores due to multiple comparisons.17,18 Effect sizes ranging from 0.20-0.49 indicate small change, 0.50-0.79 indicate moderate change, and ≥ 0.80 indicate large change.19

RESULTSParticipants’ demographics were 23.9 ± 2.0 years old, 170.7 ± 11.5 cm, and 69.7 ± 10.3 kilograms (Table 1). Nineteen participants were right foot dominant while one was left foot dominant.

No balance differences and small effect sizes were noted during the static condition for the AP (p=0.992, ES<0.01), ML (p=0.611, ES=0.03) or OA (p=0.919, ES=0.07) (Figure 2). The dynamic condition yielded significantly increased tilt and a moderate effect size for the ML direction only (p= 0.026, ES=0.78). Tilt variation did not differ in the AP direction (p=0.236, ES=0.34) or OA (p=0.142, ES=0.43) (Figure 3) with small effect sizes noted.

DISCUSSION This study found decreased ML dynamic standing balance (as noted by increased ML tilt variance and moderate effect size) among this group of participants without ankle or lower extremity injury following cryotherapy application. To the authors knowledge this study was the first to assess the role of immersion cryotherapy on dynamic standing balance in a group of uninjured individuals. Prior investigations have

Figure 1. Participant Testing Position on the Biodex® Balance System.

Table 1. Participant Demographic Information.


assessed the role of cryotherapy solely on static stand-ing balance.11 The dynamic measurement utilized in the current study may better approximate functional activities due the increased demand of lower extrem-ity to maintain standing balance as is required with the majority of functional tasks. Further, alterations in dynamic (versus static) balance may better explain some of the functional decreases in vertical jump height, running speed and agility that have been pre-viously reported.6-10 The authors of a recent system-atic review have indicated that cryotherapy has no definitive negative influence on proprioception across several joints.20 While some authors report decreased proprioceptive acuity following cryotherapy, others results are equivocal.21-26 Similar to static balance test-ing, most proprioceptive measures have been per-formed during experimental conditions that occur in controlled motions or at very slow speeds and do not adequately represent function. Prior studies assess-ing functional performance following cryotherapy have postulated that decreased balance likely contrib-uted to the adversely affected function yet this was not measured.8 Other proposed mechanisms leading

to decreased performance not encompassed in this study include: increased joint stiffness, decreased muscle, tendon, and ligament elasticity, altered plan-tar surface afferent information, or an altered neuro-physiological and neuromuscular response.20,27 As this was not a mechanistic study, any one or more of these potential mechanisms may be responsible for the increased ML tilt variance noted in the current study or functional deficits noted in prior studies.

Lateral ankle sprains account for over 85% of all ankle sprain injuries with the anterior talofibular lig-ament most commonly involved.28,29 Lateral ankle sprains most commonly occur with an inversion mechanism of injury affecting stability of the ankle in the frontal plane.28 The combined effects of lateral ankle sprain and cryotherapy on static standing bal-ance has been recently reported.11 Altered medial/lateral static standing balance was noted among ankle injured participants compared to the uninvolved leg and the balance alteration was augmented following cryotherapy application.11 Dynamic standing balance was not assessed in this prior study. Given the find-ings of the current study, it may be inferred that ML dynamic balance would be decreased to a greater extent than during the static condition and might fur-ther injure the involved ankle or increase additional injury risk if attempting to perform dynamic func-tional tasks.30,31 Additionally, peroneal muscle activa-tion has been shown to be decreased in individuals post lateral ankle sprain.32 Given the peroneal mus-cles’ role in medial/lateral ankle stability and the decreased dynamic balance found in this study, immediate return to activities following lateral ankle sprain and cryotherapy appears unjustified. The increase in ML tilt variance noted among this group of uninjured participants is concerning given the common application of cryotherapy following lateral ankle sprain with intention for return to play or prac-tice in sporting events. Clinicians should use caution with the intention of returning an athlete to play fol-lowing cryotherapy. The role of dynamic (versus static) balance should be assessed prior to return to play given the demonstrated responsiveness and larger effects sizes of the dynamic assessment found in this study.

Clinically, the order and timing of cryotherapy administration should be considered. Intervention

Figure 2. Static Balance Testing Results with the Compo-nent and Overall Measures.

Figure 3. Dynamic Balance Testing Results with the Com-ponent and Overall Measures.


schemes aimed at rehabilitation for lateral ankle sprain often target pain management, range of motion, strength, balance, and return to functional activities.33 Balance retraining may be appropriate prior to cryotherapy application to limit the balance alterations that occur during dynamic functional activities immediately post cryotherapy. In a clini-cal setting, ice immersion may not necessarily be contraindicated prior to submaximal strengthening or rehabilitative exercise when done in a controlled environment under clinician supervision.34 These submaximal controlled activities are likely best sim-ulated by the static condition tested in this study, which was not adversely affected by the ice treat-ment. Immersion cryotherapy to the foot and ankle immediately before returning an athlete to uncon-strained functional and sporting tasks whether in the clinic or on the field is cautioned given the dele-terious effects noted on dynamic ML balance found in this study.

As with all studies, some limitations must be noted. This research was performed on individuals without ankle or foot injury. The role of dynamic standing bal-ance should be explored in patients with ankle inju-ries and may differ from the findings of this study. This study assessed only the acute effects of cryother-apy on balance. The length of time dynamic balance is impaired remains to be determined and has great potential implications for clinical and on the field care. Additionally, the clinical meaningfulness or impact of increased tilt variance during dynamic balance testing is unknown. However, the moderate effect size noted (0.78) for ML balance indicates impactful changes did occur following cryotherapy treatment. Finally, this study assessed only the role of immersion cryother-apy on balance, others modes of cryotherapy treat-ment may yield differing results.20

CONCLUSIONThe results of the current study suggest that fifteen minutes of foot and ankle ice water immersion impairs dynamic ML standing balance. Sports medi-cine professionals utilizing cryotherapy as part of clinical rehabilitation techniques or with the inten-tion of returning an athlete to play or practice should consider the implication of decreased dynamic bal-ance on these activities.

REFERENCES 1. Bleakley C, McDonough S, MacAuley D. The use of

ice in the treatment of acute soft-tissue injury. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(1):251-261.

2. Knight KL. Cryotherapy in Sport Injury Management: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1995.

3. Algafl y AA, George KP. The effect of cryotherapy on nerve conduction velocity, pain threshold and pain tolerance. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41(6):365-369.

4. Nadler SF, Weingand K, Kruse RJ. The physiologic basis and clinical applications of cryotherapy and thermotherapy for the pain practitioner. Pain Physician. 2004;7(3):395-400.

5. Bleakley CM, Costello JT, Glasgow PD. Should Athletes Return to Sport After Applying Ice? Sports Med. 2012;42(1):69-87.

6. Ruiz DH, Myrer JW, Durrant E, Fellingham GW. Cryotherapy and sequential exercise bouts following cryotherapy on concentric and eccentric strength in the quadriceps. J Athl Train. 1993;28(4):320.

7. Richendollar ML, Darby LA, Brown TM. Ice bag application, active warm-up, and 3 measures of maximal functional performance. J Athl Train. 2006;41(4):364.

8. Cross KM, Wilson RW, Perrin DH. Functional performance following an ice immersion to the lower extremity. J Athl Train. 1996;31(2):113-116.

9. Bergh U, Ekblom B. Infl uence of muscle temperature on maximal muscle strength and power output in human skeletal muscles. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 1979;107(1):33-37.

10. Pereira LG, Pereira R, Neto OP, Magini M. The short and long term effects of tibialis anterior local cooling on dorsifl exion force. J Human Kinet. 2010;26(-1):65-71.

11. Kernozek TW, Greany JF, Anderson DR, et al. The effect of immersion cryotherapy on medial lateral postural sway variability in individuals with a lateral ankle sprain. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13(2):107-118.

12. Ingersoll CD, Knight KL, Merrick MA. Sensory perception of the foot and ankle following therapeutic applications of heat and cold. J Athl Train. 1992;27(3):231.

13. Arnold BL, Schmitz RJ. Examination of balance measures produced by the Biodex Stability System. J Athl Train. 1998;33(4):323.

14. Cachupe WJC, Shiffl ett B, Kahanov L, Wughalter EH. Reliability of Biodex balance system measures. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2001;5(2):97-108.

15. Pincivero D, Lephart S, Henry T. Learning effects and reliability of the Biodex Stability System. J Athl Train. 1995;30:S35.


16. Schneiders AG, Sullivan SJ, O’Malley KJ, Clarke SV, Knappstein SA, Taylor LJ. A valid and reliable clinical determination of footedness. Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;2(9):835-841.

17. Nakagawa S. A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav Ecol. 2004;15(6):1044-1045.

18. Portney L, Watkins M, Library R. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice: Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ; 2000.

19. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.

20. Costello JT, Donnelly AE. Cryotherapy and joint position sense in healthy participants: a systematic review. J Athl Train. 2010;45(3):306.

21. Wassinger CA, Myers JB, Gatti JM, Conley KM, Lephart SM. Proprioception and throwing accuracy in the dominant shoulder after cryotherapy. J Athl Train. Jan-Mar 2007;42(1):84-89.

22. Dover G, Powers ME. Cryotherapy does not impair shoulder joint position sense. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Aug 2004;85(8):1241-1246.

23. Hopper D, Whittington D, Chartier JD. Does ice immersion infl uence ankle joint position sense? Physiother Res Int. 1997;2(4):223-236.

24. LaRiviere J, Osternig LR. The effect of ice immersion on joint position sense. J Sport Rehabil. 1994;3(1):58-67.

25. Surenkok O, Aytar A, Tüzün EH, Akman MN. Cryotherapy impairs knee joint position sense and balance. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2008;16(1):69-73.

26. Uchio Y, Ochi M, Fujihara A, Adachi N, Iwasa J, Sakai Y. Cryotherapy infl uences joint laxity and position sense of the healthy knee joint. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Jan 2003;84(1):131-135.

27. McKeon P, Hertel J. Diminished plantar cutaneous sensation and postural control. Percept Mot Skills. 2007;104(1):56.

28. Garrick JG. The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprain. Am J Sports Med. 1977;5(6):241-242.

29. Fallat L, Grimm DJ, Saracco JA. Sprained ankle syndrome: prevalence and analysis of 639 acute injuries. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1998;37(4):280-285.

30. McGuine TA, Greene JJ, Best T, Leverson G. Balance as a predictor of ankle injuries in high school basketball players. Clin J Sport Med. 2000;10(4):239.

31. Wang HK, Chen CH, Shiang TY, Jan MH, Lin KH. Risk-factor analysis of high school basketball-player ankle injuries: a prospective controlled cohort study evaluating postural sway, ankle strength, and fl exibility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(6):821.

32. Menacho MO, Pereira HM, Oliveira BIR, Chagas LMPM, Toyohara MT, Cardoso JR. The peroneus reaction time during sudden inversion test: Systematic review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010;20(4):559-565.

33. Dutton M. Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. New York: McGraw Hill; 2004.

34. Rubley MD, Denegar CR, Buckley WE, Newell KM. Cryotherapy, sensation, and isometric-force variability. J Athl Train. 2003;38(2):113.

ijspt-08-009

Documents

Transcript of ijspt-08-009