Igor Vidacak - How to make successful Transition from External to Locally Funded Civil Society? Some...
-
Upload
balkan-civil-society-development-network -
Category
Documents
-
view
55 -
download
3
Transcript of Igor Vidacak - How to make successful Transition from External to Locally Funded Civil Society? Some...
How to Make a Successful
Transition from External to
Locally Funded Civil Society?
Some lessons from Croatia
Igor Vidačak
Government of the Republic of Croatia
Office for Cooperation with NGOs
e-mail: [email protected]
1.Strategy for creating enabling
environment for civil society
development - requires strong local
ownership and effective horizontal
and vertical policy coordination
National strategy for creating enabling
environment for CSOs – local ownership
broad consensus among civil society and
government representatives, about the
strategic priorities in the period 2006-11
common platform that brings together
different key stakeholders vital for creating
conditions for sustainability of an independent
and vibrant civil society
basis for better cooperation among national/
international donors
Allignement and harmonization of
donors in supporting the Strategy Strategic goals alligned with EU accession
requirements
EU actively supported implementation of
strategy – basis for PHARE 2006, IPA
2008-2011 grant schemes, TACSO
DECIM (donor exchange,coordination
and information mechanism) in Croatia –
efforts in 2007-2008
Importance of coordination of national
public funding for CSOs
Monitoring Strategy progress
More than 30 institutions involved in the
implementation of measures
Complex area – need for effective vertical and
horizontal coordination, consultation and
monitoring mechanisms
Annual reports on the Strategy
implementation
Important of continuous involvement of CSOs
- Council for Civil Society Development –
monitoring progress of achieving strategic
goals
Council for Civil Society Development
1. Protection & promotion of human rights
2. Health protection & improvement of quality of life
3. Disabled persons care
4. Child care
5. Environmental protection & sustainable development
6. Social welfare
7. Youth
8. Democratization & social development
9. Culture
10. Homeland war-veterans care
11. Sports
12. Technical culture
12 elected representatives of
NGOs
1. Union
2. Employers Association
3. Foundation
1 Trade Unions
1 Employers
1 Foundations
1 Ministry of Science, Education and Sports
2. Ministry of Health and Social Welfare
3. Ministry of Culture
4. Ministry of Family, War Veterans and Intergenerational Solidarity
5. Ministry of Finance
6. Ministry of Environmental Protection, Physical Planning and Construction
7. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration
8. Ministry if Administration
9. Ministry of Economy, Labour and Entrepreneurship
10. Office of Prime Minister of Croatia
11. Government Office for Human Rights
12. Government Office for Cooperation with NGOs
12 appointees from state
administrative bodies
2. Structures are essential - but not
substitutes (or excuse for the
lack of) genuine dialogue - need
for active search for inputs from
CSOs and continuous opening of
new entry points for dialogue with
CSOs and citizens
Structures for State-CSOs dialogue
– 13 years of efforts
Specialised bodies: Office for Cooperation with
NGOs (1998), Council for Civil Society
Development (2002), National Foundation for
Civil Society Development (2003)
more than 100 Government advisory bodies
involving around 800 representatives of CSOs
25 Parliament working committees involving
more than 100 representatives of CSOs
Increasing number of local charters of
cooperation between CSOs and local
governments
3. Sustainable funding:
transparency of funding procedures
(essential for confidence building)
diversification of funding mechanisms
ensuring operating grants for (advocacy)
CSOs
do not forget small CSOs
Ensuring transparent funding of
CSOs programmes and projects
◦ Code of Good Practice, Standards and
Benchmarks for the Allocation of Funding to
Programs and Projects of CSOs – 2007 (adopted
by Croatian Parliament)
◦ Transparency of funding – all data on grants
awarded accessible through internet
◦ Coordination meetings/ regular training seminars
for public officials at all levels
◦ Annual Info days – presenting all forthcoming
calls and discussing possibilities for their
improvement with CSOs
Diversification of funding
Decentralised system of public funding - 20
ministries and other central government bodies
providing funding for CSOs – cca 70 calls for
proposals each year
extensive funding from regional and local
government bodies (21 counties, 129 cities, 429
municipalities);
National Foundation for CSD – operating
grants – mainly for advocacy CSOs
regional networks and foundations –
promoting philantropy at local level
Ensuring institutional support
(operating grants) to CSOs increase the level of sustainability of CSOs
which contribute to the democratization and development of civil society in Croatia
invest, over a three-year period, into organizational development or stabilization of the work of CSOs
encourage the development of self-financing strategies of CSOs
support the adoption of quality assurance mechanisms in the work of CSOs
National Foundation institutional
grants - lessons learned institutional support - very delicate issue requiring a
deep understanding of CSO operations, organizational
development, the donor-CSO relationship, and other
issues such as financial management or governance.
importance of clear objective criteria and reporting
requirements
special attention to conflict of interest policies to
ensure transparent and fair process
need for continuous evaluation of impact of institutional
grants on CSO sustainability
Involve CSOs in discussing criteria for institutional
grants (annual consultation meetings)
Small CSOs/civic initiatives
4 regional foundations focusing on supporting
small civic initiatives
Importance of ensuring EU funding mechanisms
for small CSOs after the accession (micro
projects)
Encouraging partnerships between big and small
CSOs through specific CfPs /GfAs requirements
Make adequate use of country system and
processes
Direct involvement of citizens in drafting and
evaluating funding strategy