IECEE: Looking Back Living the Present Choosing the Future
44
IECEE: Looking Back Living the Present Choosing the Future Pierre de RUVO IECEE Executive Secretary & COO CAB Meeting 2013-10-22 New Delhi
-
Upload
martina-mclean -
Category
Documents
-
view
42 -
download
0
description
IECEE: Looking Back Living the Present Choosing the Future. Pierre de RUVO IECEE Executive Secretary & COO. CAB Meeting 2013-10-22 New Delhi. Looking Back. The Genesis of the IECEE. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of IECEE: Looking Back Living the Present Choosing the Future
IECEE:Looking BackLiving the Present Choosing the Future
Pierre de RUVOIECEE Executive Secretary & COO
CAB Meeting2013-10-22New Delhi
2
Looking Back
The Genesis of the IECEE
The first European organization for electrical safety standards, known as Installations Fragen Kommission (IFK), began operating in 1926.
3
1926 1939 1946 1985 1999
IEC
IECEECEEIFK
4
The Genesis of the IECEE
II WorldWar
5
The IECEE System, originally operated by the CEE (International (European) Commission for Conformity Certification of Electrical Equipment), was integrated into the IEC in 1985 as the CB Scheme of the IECEE.
Today the IECEE System operates two Schemes, the historical CB Scheme and the CB-FCS that helps Industry to access the Global Market for Electrotechnical Equipment and Components”
IEC CEE
The Genesis of of the IECEE System
Standards and Conformity Assessment
InternationalElectrotechnical
Commission
Provider of voluntary Third Party Conformity Assessment
Developing Standards
InternationalStandard
Organization
InternationalTelecommunication
Union
8
United…….
United there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided there is little we can do.
10
IECEE Administration till 1998
NorthbrookUSA
IECEE SecretariatHelsinky
IEC C.O.Geneva
MilanoITALY
11
Re-organisation…..
Auditing the IECEE Secretariat based in Helsinky Diagnostic Hiring motivate staff Reaching a financial sound situation Centralizing the various operation spread over the world Developing set of Rules of Procedure and Operational Documents Promoting the value of a Global System and its potential benefits Developing collaboration with International Organizations Participating as Lecturer in International events Meeting with Industry Meeting with Member Bodies, NCBs and CBTLs Involving goodwill individuals to play a key role in the development Listening the Electrotechnical World
12
IECEE Administration from 1999
NorthbrookUSA
IECEE SecretariatHelsinky
IEC C.O.Geneva
MilanoITALY
13
One Standard, One Test, One…
How some visionary bright men had the idea to establish a Mutual Recognition Agreement?What was the direct cause of the establishment of such a body?
14
Global Trade & Conformity Assessment
Local – Regional – Global
Conformity assessment, perceived slow, steady, bureaucratic
Conformity assessment models were developed in isolation
Due to increased global trade, manufacturers identified the need to find improvements in efficiency and profitability
Targets & Achievements
Target: One test
Target: One certification
Target: One mark
Achieved: One test
Achieved: One international certification
Achieved: One or more certification marks as needed or direct market acceptance by Regulators, Customs, Retailers, Buyers, Vendors, etc.
The IECEE Schemes are intended to reduce obstacles to international trade which arise from having to meet different national certification or approval criteria.
IECEE facilitates International Trade
17
Reasons for the Success
Flexible system that can be timely responsive to the market
Type test as opposed to a full certification & follow up service
Integration of National Differences, SNCs, Regulatory requirements
Independent impartial Peer Assessment Program
Supports regulatory policies
18
IECEE Member Bodies by Countries
Korea Rep. of
Libya
Malaysia
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russian Federation
Saudi Arabia
Serbia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Iran
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bahrain
Belarus
Belgium
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada
China
Colombia
Croatia
Czech Rep.
Denmark
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Thailand
Turkey
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Viet Nam
56 Participating Countries19
56 participating countries- 1 per country
75 National Certification Bodies - 1 or more per country
455 Testing Laboratories - 1 or more per country
2681 Manufacturer’s Testing Laboratories
IECEE : The Members
All major stakeholders
Safety – Performance - Environmental
SafetyIEC Standards for electrical safety
Energy efficiencyIEC Standards for energy efficiency
Environmental ProtectionIECEE Hazardous Substances Program
22
TESTING IEC Std+N.D.A
PPLICANT
APPLICATION
N.D..TEST
REPORT
15 working days
Process
RecognizingCountries B
Country A
NCB
NCB
IECEE CB Scheme process
23
NCB Aissuing
NCB B1 recognizingNCB B2
recognizingNCB B3
recognizing
APPLICANT
LaboratoryType test program
National differences(if applicable)
CB TestCertificate
CB TestReport
National differences(if applicable)
Type test program
National differences(if applicable)
CB Scheme in action
Analyzing…Testing…
15 working days
Application documents
Samples
CB TestReport
National differences(if applicable)
RegulatorsRetailers
Vendors/Buyers
CB TestCertificate
CB TestReport
National differences(if applicable)
CB TestCertificate
CB TestReport
National differences(if applicable)
CB TestCertificate
CB TestReport
National differences(if applicable)
APPLICANT
IECEE
TEST REPORT
REGULATORS
BUYERS
RETAILERS
MARKET
NCB
Direct Acceptance by the Market Place
APPLICANT
RecognizingCountries B
FACTORY Surveillance
FACTORY AUDIT
REPORT
C.A.R. CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
REPORT
FACTORY AUDIT
REPORT
C.A.R. CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
REPORT
Market access route ..via Recognizing NCBs
15 working days
CBTL Kansai
CB FCS Scheme in action
26
CB Scheme
ISO/IEC System 1-b
Elements of the CB Scheme vs CB-FCS
Testing
Review of the Test Report
CB Test Certificate
Test Report – TR
Full Certification Scheme
ISO/IEC System 5
Testing
Test Report – TR
Initial Factory Surveillance
Initial Factory Surveillance Report
Review of the Test Report
Review of the I.F.I.R
CB Test Certificate
Conformity Assessment Certificate & Conformity Assessment Report
(Optional) NCB Certification Mark
Production is under surveillance
Factory Surveillance
Re-testing
Market control by the NCB
27
28
On-Line Certificates – if not there – does not exist
28/27
FACTS: Finances
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012,0
1000,000
2000,000
3000,000
4000,000
5000,000
6000,000
7000,000Evolution of total assets from 1998 to 2012
29
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012,0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
Financial Results from 1998 to 2012
30
FACTS: Finances
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Certification Bodies
Testing Labo-ratories
31
FACTS: Membership
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Manufacturer's Testing Labora-tories
32
FACTS: MTLs Membership
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012'0
10'000
20'000
30'000
40'000
50'000
60'000
70'000
80'000
33
FACTS: CB Test Certificates
34
FACTS: Impact of the CB Test Certificates vs Regional Schemes
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
REGIONAL SCHEME
IECEE CB SCHEME
35
ACHIEVEMENTS: Governmental awareness
Historical tripartite MoU with common target and goals between :
IEC-ILAC-IAF
Achievement: MoU IEC-ILAC-IAF
Unified Reassessment modelExample for Testing Laboratory
Data Base of a Common Pool of
Registered Technical Assessors
Testing Laboratory accredited by COFRAC and accepted by the IECEE
IEC C.A. SystemSecretariat
ILAC Member AB
Selection and appointment of:
Lead AssessorTechnical Assessor
+
COMMON
ASSESSMENT REPORT
COMMON
ASSESSMENT REPORT
Lead AssessorTechnical Assessor
+
Short list of pre-selected
Technical Assessor(s)
ON-SITE ASSESSMENT
37
Data Base of a Common Pool of
Registered Technical Assessors
Certification Body accredited by NATA and registered by the IECEE System
IEC C.A. SystemSecretariat
IAFMember AB
Selection and appointment of:
Lead AssessorTechnical Assessor
+
COMMON
ASSESSMENT REPORT
COMMON
ASSESSMENT REPORT
Lead AssessorTechnical Assessor
+
Australia
ON-SITE ASSESSMENT
Short list of pre-selected
Technical Assessor(s)
Unified Reassessment modelExample for Certification Body
The OIML and the IEC have agreed to consult each other on any technical issues of joint interest and shall provide each other with any information or documentation concerning matters of mutual interest, particularly concerning legal metrology related to standardization and conformity assessment within the IECEE.
Achievement: MoU IEC-OIML
THE FUTURE / THE FUTURE LOOKS BRIGHT / LOOKING AHEAD
40
The future is now
41
Future exciting challenges
The need to have a strategic global market relevance. The need to position international standardization and
Conformity Assessment as a strategic business tool. The recognition that global reach is not an easy
objective. The acceptance that innovation and adding business
value takes hard work and open collaboration. The peoples of the world recognize that
standardization and Conformity Assessment improve their lives.
The National Committees are the foundation for achieving national and global relevance.
IECEE is at the forefront…
We are at the forefront of new exciting challenges in Conformity Assessment and the IECEE System is aiming at to be the right player, a player that can be trusted.
IECEE takes Conformity Assessment Further!
43
CAB Meeting 2013-10-22 New Delhi
Au revoir
