IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

download IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

of 40

Transcript of IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    1/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 1

    CH 5

    CAPACITY PLANNING

    IE 305 BUS 307

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    2/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 2

    Capacity

    The throughput, or the number ofunits a facility can hold, receive,

    store, or produce in a period of time Determines fixed costs

    Determines if demand will be

    satisfied

    Three time horizons

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    3/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 3

    Modify capacity Use capacity

    Planning Over a Time

    Horizon

    Intermediate-rangeplanning

    Subcontract Add personnelAdd equipment Build or use inventoryAdd shifts

    Short-range

    planning

    Schedule jobsSchedule personnelAllocate machinery*

    Long-rangeplanning

    Add facilitiesAdd long lead time equipment *

    *Limited options existFigure S7.1

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    4/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 4

    Design and Effective

    Capacity Design capacity is the maximum

    theoretical output of a system

    Normally expressed as a rate

    Effective capacity is the capacity afirm expects to achieve given currentoperating constraints

    Often lower than design capacity

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    5/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 5

    Utilization and Efficiency

    Utilization is the percent of design capacityachieved

    Efficiency is the percent of effective capacity

    achieved

    Utilization = Actual Output/Design Capacity

    Efficiency = Actual Output/Effective Capacity

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    6/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 6

    Bakery Example

    Actual production last week =148,000 rollsEffective capacity =175,000 rollsDesign capacity =1,200 rolls per hour

    Bakery operates 7 days/week, 3 8 hour shifts

    Design capacity = (7 x 3 x 8) x (1,200) = 201,600 rolls

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    7/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 7

    Bakery Example

    Actual production last week =148,000 rollsEffective capacity =175,000 rollsDesign capacity =1,200 rolls per hour

    Bakery operates 7 days/week, 3 8 hour shifts

    Design capacity = (7 x 3 x 8) x (1,200) = 201,600 rolls

    Utilization = 148,000/201,600 = 73.4%

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    8/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 8

    Bakery Example

    Actual production last week =148,000 rollsEffective capacity =175,000 rollsDesign capacity =1,200 rolls per hour

    Bakery operates 7 days/week, 3 8 hourshifts

    Design capacity = (7 x 3 x 8) x (1,200) = 201,600 rolls

    Utilization = 148,000/201,600 = 73.4%

    Efficiency = 148,000/175,000 = 84.6%

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    9/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 9

    Bakery Example

    Actual production last week =148,000 rollsEffective capacity =175,000 rollsDesign capacity =1,200 rolls per hour

    Bakery operates 7 days/week, 3 8 hour shifts

    Efficiency = 84.6%

    Efficiency of new line = 75%

    Expected Output =(Effective Capacity)(Efficiency)

    = (175,000)(.75) = 131,250 rolls

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    10/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 10

    Managing Demand

    Demand exceeds capacity

    Curtail demand by raising prices,scheduling longer lead time

    Long term solution is to increase capacity

    Capacity exceeds demand

    Stimulate market

    Product changes

    Adjusting to seasonal demands

    Produce products with complimentarydemand patterns

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    11/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 11

    Economies and

    Diseconomies of Scale

    Economiesof scale

    Diseconomiesof scale

    25 - RoomRoadside Motel 50 - Room

    Roadside Motel

    75 - RoomRoadside Motel

    Number of Rooms25 50 75

    A

    verageunitc

    ost

    (dollarsperroomp

    ernight)

    Figure S7.2

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    12/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 12

    Capacity Considerations

    Forecast demand accurately

    Understanding the technologyand capacity increments

    Find the optimal operating level(volume)

    Build for change

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    13/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 13

    Approaches to CapacityExpansion

    (a) Leading demand withincremental expansion

    De

    mand

    Expecteddemand

    Newcapacity

    (b) Leading demand withone-step expansion

    De

    mand

    Newcapacity

    Expecteddemand

    (d) Attempts to have an averagecapacity with incrementalexpansion

    Demand

    Newcapacity Expected

    demand

    (c) Capacity lags demand withincremental expansion

    Demand

    NewcapacityExpecteddemand

    Figure S7.4

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    14/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 14

    Break-Even Analysis

    Technique for evaluating processand equipment alternatives

    Objective is to find the point indollars and units at which costequals revenue

    Requires estimation of fixed costs,variable costs, and revenue

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    15/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 15

    Break-Even Analysis

    Fixed costs are costs that continueeven if no units are produced

    Depreciation, taxes, debt, mortgagepayments

    Variable costs are costs that varywith the volume of units produced

    Labor, materials, portion of utilities

    Contribution is the difference betweenselling price and variable cost

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    16/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 16

    Break-Even Analysis

    Costs and revenue are linear

    functionsGenerally not the case in the real

    world

    We actually know these costs

    Very difficult to accomplish

    There is no time value of money

    Assumptions

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    17/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 17

    Break-Even Analysis

    Total revenue line

    Total cost line

    Variable cost

    Fixed cost

    Break-even pointTotal cost = Total revenue

    900

    800

    700

    600

    500

    400

    300

    200

    100

    | | | | | | | | | | | |0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

    Costindollars

    Volume (units per period)

    Figure S7.5

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    18/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 18

    Break-Even Analysis

    BEPx = Break-even point inunits

    BEP$ = Break-even point indollars

    P = Price per unit (after

    all discounts)

    x = Number of unitsproduced

    TR = Total revenue = PxF = Fixed costsV = Variable costs

    TC = Total costs = F + Vx

    TR = TCor

    Px = F + Vx

    Break-even pointoccurs when

    BEPx = FP - V

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    19/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 19

    Break-Even Analysis

    BEPx = Break-even point inunits

    BEP$ = Break-even point indollars

    P = Price per unit (after

    all discounts)

    x = Number of unitsproduced

    TR = Total revenue = PxF = Fixed costsV = Variable costs

    TC = Total costs = F + Vx

    BEP$ = BEPx P

    = P

    =

    =

    F(P - V)/P

    FP - V

    F1 - V/P

    Profit = TR - TC

    = Px - (F + Vx)= Px - F - Vx

    =(P - V)x - F

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    20/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 20

    Break-Even Example

    Fixed costs = $10,000 Material = $.75/unitDirect labor = $1.50/unit Selling price = $4.00 per unit

    BEP$= =F

    1 - (V/P)$10,000

    1 - [(1.50 + .75)/(4.00)]

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    21/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 21

    Break-Even Example

    Fixed costs = $10,000 Material = $.75/unitDirect labor = $1.50/unit Selling price = $4.00 per unit

    BEP$= =F1 - (V/P)$10,000

    1 - [(1.50 + .75)/(4.00)]

    = = $22,857.14$10,000.4375

    BEPx= = = 5,714F

    P - V$10,000

    4.00 - (1.50 + .75)

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    22/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 22

    Break-Even Example

    BEP$=F

    1 - x (Wi)Vi

    P i

    Multiproduct Case

    where V = variable cost per unit

    P = price per unitF = fixed costs

    W = percent each product is of total dollar salesi = each product

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    23/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 23

    Multiproduct Example

    Annual ForecastedItem Price Cost Sales Units

    Sandwich $2.95 $1.25 7,000

    Soft drink .80 .30 7,000Baked potato 1.55 .47 5,000

    Tea .75 .25 5,000Salad bar 2.85 1.00 3,000

    Fixed costs = $3,500 per month

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    24/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 24

    Multiproduct ExampleAnnual Forecasted

    Item Price Cost Sales UnitsSandwich $2.95 $1.25 7,000

    Soft drink .80 .30 7,000Baked potato 1.55 .47 5,000

    Tea .75 .25 5,000Salad bar 2.85 1.00 3,000

    Fixed costs = $3,500 per month

    Sandwich $2.95 $1.25 .42 .58 $20,650 .446 .259

    Soft drink .80 .30 .38 .62 5,600 .121 .075Baked 1.55 .47 .30 .70 7,750 .167 .117

    potatoTea .75 .25 .33 .67 3,750 .081 .054Salad bar 2.85 1.00 .35 .65 8,550 .185 .120

    $46,300 1.000 .625

    Annual WeightedSelling Variable Forecasted % of Contribution

    Item (i) Price (P) Cost (V) (V/P) 1 - (V/P) Sales $ Sales (col 5 x col 7)

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    25/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 25

    Multiproduct Example

    Annual ForecastedItem Price Cost Sales Units

    Sandwich $2.95 $1.25 7,000

    Soft drink .80 .30 7,000Baked potato 1.55 .47 5,000

    Tea .75 .25 5,000Salad bar 2.85 1.00 3,000

    Fixed costs = $3,500 per month

    Sandwich $2.95 $1.25 .42 .58 $20,650 .446 .259

    Soft drink.80 .30 .38 .62 5,600 .121 .075

    Baked 1.55 .47 .30 .70 7,750 .167 .117potato

    Tea .75 .25 .33 .67 3,750 .081 .054Salad bar 2.85 1.00 .35 .65 8,550 .185 .120

    $46,300 1.000 .625

    Annual WeightedSelling Variable Forecasted % of Contribution

    Item (i) Price (P) Cost (V) (V/P) 1 - (V/P) Sales $ Sales (col 5 x col 7)

    BEP$=F

    1 - x (Wi)

    Vi

    P i

    = = $67,200$3,500 x 12

    .625

    Dailysales = = $215.38

    $67,200312 days

    .446 x $215.38$2.95

    = 32.6 33sandwiches

    per day

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    26/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 26

    Strategy-Driven Investment

    Operations may be responsible

    for return-on-investment (ROI) Analyzing capacity alternatives

    should include capitalinvestment, variable cost, cashflows, and net present value

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    27/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 27

    Net Present Value (NPV)

    where F = future value

    P = present value

    i = interest rateN = number of years

    P =F

    (1 + i)N

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    28/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 28

    NPV Using Factors

    P = = FXF

    (1 + i)N

    where X = a factor from Table S7.1defined as = 1/(1 + i)N andF = future value

    Year 5% 6% 7% 10%

    1 .952 .943 .935 .9092 .907 .890 .873 .8263 .864 .840 .816 .7514 .823 .792 .763 .6835 .784 .747 .713 .621

    Portion ofTable S7.1

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    29/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 29

    Present Value of an Annuity

    An annuity is an investment whichgenerates uniform equal payments

    S = RXwhere X = factor from Table S7.2

    S = present value of a series ofuniform annual receipts

    R = receipts that are received everyyear of the life of the investment

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    30/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 30

    Present Value of an Annuity

    Portion of Table S7.2

    Year 5% 6% 7% 10%

    1 .952 .943 .935 .9092 1.859 1.833 1.808 1.7363 2.723 2.676 2.624 2.4874 4.329 3.465 3.387 3.1705 5.076 4.212 4.100 3.791

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    31/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 31

    Process, Volume, and Variety

    Process Focusprojects, job shops

    (machine, print,

    carpentry)Standard Register

    Repetitive(autos, motorcycles)

    Harley Davidson

    Product Focus(commercialbaked goods,steel, glass)Nucor Steel

    High Varietyone or fewunits per run,high variety

    (allowscustomization)

    Changes inModulesmodest runs,standardized

    modulesChanges inAttributes(such as grade,quality, size,thickness, etc.)long runs only

    Mass Customization(difficult to achieve,but huge rewards)

    Dell Computer Co.

    Poor Strategy(Both fixed andvariable costs

    are high)

    LowVolume

    RepetitiveProcess

    HighVolume

    VolumeFigure 7.1

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    32/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 32

    Some Possible Growth Patterns

    Volume

    Volume

    Volume

    Volume

    0 0

    0 0

    Time Time

    Time Time

    Growth Decline

    Cyclical Stable

    l i C i

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    33/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 33

    Developing CapacityAlternatives

    Design flexibility into systems

    Take a big picture approach to

    capacity changes Prepare to deal with capacity chunks

    Attempt to smooth out capacity

    requirements Identify the optimal operating level

    l i i i

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    34/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 34

    Need to be near customers

    Capacity and location are closely tied

    Inability to store services

    Capacity must me matched with timingof demand

    Degree of volatility of demand

    Peak demand periods

    Planning Service Capacity

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    35/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 35

    Measuring Capacity

    By units of output ( barrels of beer , #of cars)

    Standard time time to produce aproduct by a qualified operator at anormal pace.

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    36/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 36

    Levels of Capacity

    Must be measured at these threelevels

    Machine or individual worker Work center

    Plant

    C l l ti P i

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    37/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 3737

    Calculating ProcessingRequirements

    ProductAnnualDemand

    Standard

    processing timeper unit (hr.)

    Processing timeneeded (hr.)

    #1

    #2

    #3

    400

    300

    700

    5.0

    8.0

    2.0

    2,000

    2,400

    1,4005,800

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    38/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 38

    Determining CapacityAvailable

    Measurement

    Demonstrated capacity comes fromhistorical data

    Calculation

    Calculated or rated capacity is based onavailable time, utilization and efficiency.

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    39/40

    2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 39

    Capacity Req.

    Load determination

    1. Determine time needed for each orderat each center.

    2. Sum the CR for individual orders toobtain a load.

    - Time needed for order

    - Sum of Setup and Run times- Example 150 gear shafts with a setup of 1.5

    hours and run time of 0.2 hours

    - Standard time = 1.5 + ( 150 x 0.2)

  • 7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning

    40/40

    QUESTIONS???