IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
-
Upload
muhendis8900 -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
1/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 1
CH 5
CAPACITY PLANNING
IE 305 BUS 307
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
2/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 2
Capacity
The throughput, or the number ofunits a facility can hold, receive,
store, or produce in a period of time Determines fixed costs
Determines if demand will be
satisfied
Three time horizons
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
3/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 3
Modify capacity Use capacity
Planning Over a Time
Horizon
Intermediate-rangeplanning
Subcontract Add personnelAdd equipment Build or use inventoryAdd shifts
Short-range
planning
Schedule jobsSchedule personnelAllocate machinery*
Long-rangeplanning
Add facilitiesAdd long lead time equipment *
*Limited options existFigure S7.1
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
4/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 4
Design and Effective
Capacity Design capacity is the maximum
theoretical output of a system
Normally expressed as a rate
Effective capacity is the capacity afirm expects to achieve given currentoperating constraints
Often lower than design capacity
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
5/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 5
Utilization and Efficiency
Utilization is the percent of design capacityachieved
Efficiency is the percent of effective capacity
achieved
Utilization = Actual Output/Design Capacity
Efficiency = Actual Output/Effective Capacity
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
6/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 6
Bakery Example
Actual production last week =148,000 rollsEffective capacity =175,000 rollsDesign capacity =1,200 rolls per hour
Bakery operates 7 days/week, 3 8 hour shifts
Design capacity = (7 x 3 x 8) x (1,200) = 201,600 rolls
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
7/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 7
Bakery Example
Actual production last week =148,000 rollsEffective capacity =175,000 rollsDesign capacity =1,200 rolls per hour
Bakery operates 7 days/week, 3 8 hour shifts
Design capacity = (7 x 3 x 8) x (1,200) = 201,600 rolls
Utilization = 148,000/201,600 = 73.4%
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
8/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 8
Bakery Example
Actual production last week =148,000 rollsEffective capacity =175,000 rollsDesign capacity =1,200 rolls per hour
Bakery operates 7 days/week, 3 8 hourshifts
Design capacity = (7 x 3 x 8) x (1,200) = 201,600 rolls
Utilization = 148,000/201,600 = 73.4%
Efficiency = 148,000/175,000 = 84.6%
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
9/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 9
Bakery Example
Actual production last week =148,000 rollsEffective capacity =175,000 rollsDesign capacity =1,200 rolls per hour
Bakery operates 7 days/week, 3 8 hour shifts
Efficiency = 84.6%
Efficiency of new line = 75%
Expected Output =(Effective Capacity)(Efficiency)
= (175,000)(.75) = 131,250 rolls
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
10/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 10
Managing Demand
Demand exceeds capacity
Curtail demand by raising prices,scheduling longer lead time
Long term solution is to increase capacity
Capacity exceeds demand
Stimulate market
Product changes
Adjusting to seasonal demands
Produce products with complimentarydemand patterns
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
11/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 11
Economies and
Diseconomies of Scale
Economiesof scale
Diseconomiesof scale
25 - RoomRoadside Motel 50 - Room
Roadside Motel
75 - RoomRoadside Motel
Number of Rooms25 50 75
A
verageunitc
ost
(dollarsperroomp
ernight)
Figure S7.2
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
12/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 12
Capacity Considerations
Forecast demand accurately
Understanding the technologyand capacity increments
Find the optimal operating level(volume)
Build for change
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
13/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 13
Approaches to CapacityExpansion
(a) Leading demand withincremental expansion
De
mand
Expecteddemand
Newcapacity
(b) Leading demand withone-step expansion
De
mand
Newcapacity
Expecteddemand
(d) Attempts to have an averagecapacity with incrementalexpansion
Demand
Newcapacity Expected
demand
(c) Capacity lags demand withincremental expansion
Demand
NewcapacityExpecteddemand
Figure S7.4
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
14/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 14
Break-Even Analysis
Technique for evaluating processand equipment alternatives
Objective is to find the point indollars and units at which costequals revenue
Requires estimation of fixed costs,variable costs, and revenue
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
15/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 15
Break-Even Analysis
Fixed costs are costs that continueeven if no units are produced
Depreciation, taxes, debt, mortgagepayments
Variable costs are costs that varywith the volume of units produced
Labor, materials, portion of utilities
Contribution is the difference betweenselling price and variable cost
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
16/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 16
Break-Even Analysis
Costs and revenue are linear
functionsGenerally not the case in the real
world
We actually know these costs
Very difficult to accomplish
There is no time value of money
Assumptions
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
17/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 17
Break-Even Analysis
Total revenue line
Total cost line
Variable cost
Fixed cost
Break-even pointTotal cost = Total revenue
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
| | | | | | | | | | | |0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Costindollars
Volume (units per period)
Figure S7.5
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
18/40 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 18
Break-Even Analysis
BEPx = Break-even point inunits
BEP$ = Break-even point indollars
P = Price per unit (after
all discounts)
x = Number of unitsproduced
TR = Total revenue = PxF = Fixed costsV = Variable costs
TC = Total costs = F + Vx
TR = TCor
Px = F + Vx
Break-even pointoccurs when
BEPx = FP - V
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
19/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 19
Break-Even Analysis
BEPx = Break-even point inunits
BEP$ = Break-even point indollars
P = Price per unit (after
all discounts)
x = Number of unitsproduced
TR = Total revenue = PxF = Fixed costsV = Variable costs
TC = Total costs = F + Vx
BEP$ = BEPx P
= P
=
=
F(P - V)/P
FP - V
F1 - V/P
Profit = TR - TC
= Px - (F + Vx)= Px - F - Vx
=(P - V)x - F
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
20/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 20
Break-Even Example
Fixed costs = $10,000 Material = $.75/unitDirect labor = $1.50/unit Selling price = $4.00 per unit
BEP$= =F
1 - (V/P)$10,000
1 - [(1.50 + .75)/(4.00)]
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
21/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 21
Break-Even Example
Fixed costs = $10,000 Material = $.75/unitDirect labor = $1.50/unit Selling price = $4.00 per unit
BEP$= =F1 - (V/P)$10,000
1 - [(1.50 + .75)/(4.00)]
= = $22,857.14$10,000.4375
BEPx= = = 5,714F
P - V$10,000
4.00 - (1.50 + .75)
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
22/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 22
Break-Even Example
BEP$=F
1 - x (Wi)Vi
P i
Multiproduct Case
where V = variable cost per unit
P = price per unitF = fixed costs
W = percent each product is of total dollar salesi = each product
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
23/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 23
Multiproduct Example
Annual ForecastedItem Price Cost Sales Units
Sandwich $2.95 $1.25 7,000
Soft drink .80 .30 7,000Baked potato 1.55 .47 5,000
Tea .75 .25 5,000Salad bar 2.85 1.00 3,000
Fixed costs = $3,500 per month
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
24/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 24
Multiproduct ExampleAnnual Forecasted
Item Price Cost Sales UnitsSandwich $2.95 $1.25 7,000
Soft drink .80 .30 7,000Baked potato 1.55 .47 5,000
Tea .75 .25 5,000Salad bar 2.85 1.00 3,000
Fixed costs = $3,500 per month
Sandwich $2.95 $1.25 .42 .58 $20,650 .446 .259
Soft drink .80 .30 .38 .62 5,600 .121 .075Baked 1.55 .47 .30 .70 7,750 .167 .117
potatoTea .75 .25 .33 .67 3,750 .081 .054Salad bar 2.85 1.00 .35 .65 8,550 .185 .120
$46,300 1.000 .625
Annual WeightedSelling Variable Forecasted % of Contribution
Item (i) Price (P) Cost (V) (V/P) 1 - (V/P) Sales $ Sales (col 5 x col 7)
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
25/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 25
Multiproduct Example
Annual ForecastedItem Price Cost Sales Units
Sandwich $2.95 $1.25 7,000
Soft drink .80 .30 7,000Baked potato 1.55 .47 5,000
Tea .75 .25 5,000Salad bar 2.85 1.00 3,000
Fixed costs = $3,500 per month
Sandwich $2.95 $1.25 .42 .58 $20,650 .446 .259
Soft drink.80 .30 .38 .62 5,600 .121 .075
Baked 1.55 .47 .30 .70 7,750 .167 .117potato
Tea .75 .25 .33 .67 3,750 .081 .054Salad bar 2.85 1.00 .35 .65 8,550 .185 .120
$46,300 1.000 .625
Annual WeightedSelling Variable Forecasted % of Contribution
Item (i) Price (P) Cost (V) (V/P) 1 - (V/P) Sales $ Sales (col 5 x col 7)
BEP$=F
1 - x (Wi)
Vi
P i
= = $67,200$3,500 x 12
.625
Dailysales = = $215.38
$67,200312 days
.446 x $215.38$2.95
= 32.6 33sandwiches
per day
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
26/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 26
Strategy-Driven Investment
Operations may be responsible
for return-on-investment (ROI) Analyzing capacity alternatives
should include capitalinvestment, variable cost, cashflows, and net present value
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
27/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 27
Net Present Value (NPV)
where F = future value
P = present value
i = interest rateN = number of years
P =F
(1 + i)N
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
28/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 28
NPV Using Factors
P = = FXF
(1 + i)N
where X = a factor from Table S7.1defined as = 1/(1 + i)N andF = future value
Year 5% 6% 7% 10%
1 .952 .943 .935 .9092 .907 .890 .873 .8263 .864 .840 .816 .7514 .823 .792 .763 .6835 .784 .747 .713 .621
Portion ofTable S7.1
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
29/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 29
Present Value of an Annuity
An annuity is an investment whichgenerates uniform equal payments
S = RXwhere X = factor from Table S7.2
S = present value of a series ofuniform annual receipts
R = receipts that are received everyyear of the life of the investment
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
30/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 30
Present Value of an Annuity
Portion of Table S7.2
Year 5% 6% 7% 10%
1 .952 .943 .935 .9092 1.859 1.833 1.808 1.7363 2.723 2.676 2.624 2.4874 4.329 3.465 3.387 3.1705 5.076 4.212 4.100 3.791
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
31/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 31
Process, Volume, and Variety
Process Focusprojects, job shops
(machine, print,
carpentry)Standard Register
Repetitive(autos, motorcycles)
Harley Davidson
Product Focus(commercialbaked goods,steel, glass)Nucor Steel
High Varietyone or fewunits per run,high variety
(allowscustomization)
Changes inModulesmodest runs,standardized
modulesChanges inAttributes(such as grade,quality, size,thickness, etc.)long runs only
Mass Customization(difficult to achieve,but huge rewards)
Dell Computer Co.
Poor Strategy(Both fixed andvariable costs
are high)
LowVolume
RepetitiveProcess
HighVolume
VolumeFigure 7.1
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
32/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 32
Some Possible Growth Patterns
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
0 0
0 0
Time Time
Time Time
Growth Decline
Cyclical Stable
l i C i
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
33/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 33
Developing CapacityAlternatives
Design flexibility into systems
Take a big picture approach to
capacity changes Prepare to deal with capacity chunks
Attempt to smooth out capacity
requirements Identify the optimal operating level
l i i i
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
34/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 34
Need to be near customers
Capacity and location are closely tied
Inability to store services
Capacity must me matched with timingof demand
Degree of volatility of demand
Peak demand periods
Planning Service Capacity
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
35/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 35
Measuring Capacity
By units of output ( barrels of beer , #of cars)
Standard time time to produce aproduct by a qualified operator at anormal pace.
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
36/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 36
Levels of Capacity
Must be measured at these threelevels
Machine or individual worker Work center
Plant
C l l ti P i
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
37/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 3737
Calculating ProcessingRequirements
ProductAnnualDemand
Standard
processing timeper unit (hr.)
Processing timeneeded (hr.)
#1
#2
#3
400
300
700
5.0
8.0
2.0
2,000
2,400
1,4005,800
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
38/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 38
Determining CapacityAvailable
Measurement
Demonstrated capacity comes fromhistorical data
Calculation
Calculated or rated capacity is based onavailable time, utilization and efficiency.
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
39/40
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S7 39
Capacity Req.
Load determination
1. Determine time needed for each orderat each center.
2. Sum the CR for individual orders toobtain a load.
- Time needed for order
- Sum of Setup and Run times- Example 150 gear shafts with a setup of 1.5
hours and run time of 0.2 hours
- Standard time = 1.5 + ( 150 x 0.2)
-
7/29/2019 IE 305 CH 5 Capacity Planning
40/40
QUESTIONS???