IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other...

52
IDES REVISION (B) THA Revision ............................................................................................................................ 2 Data collection form: THA Revision ..................................................................................... 2 General ................................................................................................................................... 5 Chronological distribution of Revisions and primary THAs ............................................. 5 Distribution of............. ....................................................................................................... 6 Side ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Diagnosis N=9`258 ............................................................................................................ 7 Number of previous revisions N=10`220 ........................................................................... 7 OP elsewhere N=10`220 .................................................................................................... 8 Specification of previous revisions .................................................................................... 9 Status contralateral hip N= 10`220................................................................................... 10 Type of systemic illness (8855 illnesses in 5903 patients) .............................................. 10 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness primary THA vs. Revision ............ 11 Clinical evaluation of affected hip ....................................................................................... 12 Walking capacity restriction N= 10220 ........................................................................... 13 …. Walking capacity restriction depending on revision side........................................... 13 Charnley Classification .................................................................................................... 14 Usual support needed N=1537 ......................................................................................... 15 Time walked with support N=6221.................................................................................. 15 Time walked without support N= 9157............................................................................ 16 Pain of the hip N=10`068 ................................................................................................. 16 Flexion range N=10`219 .................................................................................................. 17 Flexion range depending on number of previous revisions ............................................. 17 Apparent leg length discrepancy (shorter) ....................................................................... 19 Comparison of leg length discrepancy preoperative by surgery side............................. 19 Radiological Evaluation ....................................................................................................... 20 Acetabular side migration (superior) N=7`261 ................................................................ 20 Acetabular side migration (medial) N= 1`438 ................................................................. 21 Femoral side stem subsidence N=10`035......................................................................... 21 Endosteal resorption N=741 ............................................................................................. 22 Operation/ Prosthetic Components....................................................................................... 22 Cup material ..................................................................................................................... 22 ...chronological distribution of cup material .................................................................... 23 Acetabular Augmenation N= 8146 .................................................................................. 24 Acetabular augmenation depending on number of pervious revisions ............................ 25 Femoral head N=7`959..................................................................................................... 26 ...chronological distribution of femoral head material ..................................................... 27 Stem material N=6793 ..................................................................................................... 28 ...chronological distribution of stem material .................................................................. 28 Operation procedure ............................................................................................................. 30 Revision of Components N=10220 .................................................................................. 30 Revisions of components because of aseptic loosening ................................................... 31 Fixation of components N=10`220 .................................................................................. 32 Other operations (reduction, trochanter; others) N=2`327 .............................................. 33 Acetabular reconstruction with bone graft N=10`219...................................................... 33 Calcar defect N=2`316 ..................................................................................................... 34 Femoral Cortex N=3`085 ................................................................................................. 35 Extraction cement N=4`717 ............................................................................................. 36 Fixation of greater trochanter N=5`883 ........................................................................... 36 Anteversion of stem N=1`423 .......................................................................................... 37

Transcript of IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other...

Page 1: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

IDES REVISION (B) THA Revision ............................................................................................................................ 2

Data collection form: THA Revision ..................................................................................... 2 General ................................................................................................................................... 5

Chronological distribution of Revisions and primary THAs ............................................. 5 Distribution of............. ....................................................................................................... 6 Side..................................................................................................................................... 6 Diagnosis N=9`258 ............................................................................................................ 7 Number of previous revisions N=10`220........................................................................... 7 OP elsewhere N=10`220 .................................................................................................... 8 Specification of previous revisions .................................................................................... 9 Status contralateral hip N= 10`220................................................................................... 10 Type of systemic illness (8855 illnesses in 5903 patients) .............................................. 10 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness primary THA vs. Revision ............ 11

Clinical evaluation of affected hip ....................................................................................... 12 Walking capacity restriction N= 10220 ........................................................................... 13 …. Walking capacity restriction depending on revision side........................................... 13 Charnley Classification .................................................................................................... 14 Usual support needed N=1537 ......................................................................................... 15 Time walked with support N=6221.................................................................................. 15 Time walked without support N= 9157............................................................................ 16 Pain of the hip N=10`068 ................................................................................................. 16 Flexion range N=10`219 .................................................................................................. 17 Flexion range depending on number of previous revisions ............................................. 17 Apparent leg length discrepancy (shorter) ....................................................................... 19 Comparison of leg length discrepancy preoperative by surgery side............................. 19

Radiological Evaluation ....................................................................................................... 20 Acetabular side migration (superior) N=7`261 ................................................................ 20 Acetabular side migration (medial) N= 1`438 ................................................................. 21 Femoral side stem subsidence N=10`035......................................................................... 21 Endosteal resorption N=741............................................................................................. 22

Operation/ Prosthetic Components....................................................................................... 22 Cup material ..................................................................................................................... 22 ...chronological distribution of cup material .................................................................... 23 Acetabular Augmenation N= 8146 .................................................................................. 24 Acetabular augmenation depending on number of pervious revisions ............................ 25 Femoral head N=7`959..................................................................................................... 26 ...chronological distribution of femoral head material ..................................................... 27 Stem material N=6793 ..................................................................................................... 28 ...chronological distribution of stem material .................................................................. 28

Operation procedure............................................................................................................. 30 Revision of Components N=10220 .................................................................................. 30 Revisions of components because of aseptic loosening................................................... 31 Fixation of components N=10`220 .................................................................................. 32 Other operations (reduction, trochanter; others) N=2`327.............................................. 33 Acetabular reconstruction with bone graft N=10`219...................................................... 33 Calcar defect N=2`316 ..................................................................................................... 34 Femoral Cortex N=3`085 ................................................................................................. 35 Extraction cement N=4`717 ............................................................................................. 36 Fixation of greater trochanter N=5`883 ........................................................................... 36 Anteversion of stem N=1`423.......................................................................................... 37

Page 2: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Perioperative Complications N=10`221........................................................................... 37 Treatment of Complications N=10`249 ........................................................................... 38 Duration of procedure (time) N=10`220 .......................................................................... 39 Anesthesia N=10`220....................................................................................................... 40 ... chronological distribution of Anesthesia...................................................................... 40

Hospital Course .................................................................................................................... 41 Postoperative treatment/ after Operation N=9`976 .......................................................... 41 Intensive care N=10`220 .................................................................................................. 42 Prophylaxis N= 9`824 (Hips) ........................................................................................... 42 ...chronological distribution of prophylaxis ..................................................................... 43 Systemic complications N=1`494 .................................................................................... 44 Local complication N=10`310 ......................................................................................... 45 Revision N=10`220 .......................................................................................................... 46

Discharge Status................................................................................................................... 46 Distribution of ….. ........................................................................................................... 46 Hip pain N=10`219........................................................................................................... 46 Other pain N=10`220 ....................................................................................................... 47 Flexion at discharge N=10`219 ........................................................................................ 47 Comparison flexion range preoperativ and flexion range at discharge............................ 48 Apparent leg length discrepancy (shorter) N=10`216...................................................... 48 Comparison leg length discrepancy preoperative – postoperative................................... 49

X-Ray acetabular component at discharge........................................................................... 50 Inclination (abduction) N=9`025...................................................................................... 50 Anteversion N=9`010....................................................................................................... 50

X-Ray femoral component at discharge............................................................................... 51 Position of the stem N=8`307........................................................................................... 51 Cement in femur N=5`592 ............................................................................................... 51 Greater trochanter N=8`910 ............................................................................................. 52

THA Revision Based on the IDES-B forms for Revision THA (fig. 3) we can present 10220 total hip arthroplasty -revisions performed between 1968 and 2003.

Data collection form: THA Revision Fig. 1b IDES-B form for THA Revision (Version 1999)

Page 3: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness
Page 4: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness
Page 5: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

General

Chronological distribution of Revisions and primary THAs

Frequency Row Pct

Table of INTERVAL by THA TYP (primary – revision)

TYP INTERVAL

PRIM REVISION

Total

1968 (1966-1970) 415 93.26

30 6.74

445

1973 (1971-1975) 838 89.72

96 10.28

934

1978 (1976-1980) 1779 84.80

319 15.20

2098

1983 (1981-1985) 8065 83.57

1586 16.43

9651

1988 (1986-1990) 16838 83.26

3385 16.74

20223

1993 (1991-1995) 11953 80.57

2882 19.43

14835

1998 (1996-2000) 8087 82.66

1697 17.34

9784

2003 (2001-2003) 1870 89.43

221 10.57

2091

Total 49845 82.99

10216 17.01

60061 100.00

Frequency Missing = 24

Page 6: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Distribution of.............

Side

OPERATED SIDE

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

right hip 5346 52.31 5346 52.31

left hip 4874 47.69 10220 100.00

Page 7: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Diagnosis N=9`258

DIAGNOSIS

DIAGNOSIS Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

Loosening aseptic 7641 82.53 7641 82.53

Loosening infected 341 3.68 7982 86.22

Loosening eventually infected

71 0.77 8053 86.98

Girdlestone 238 2.57 8291 89.55

malposition 228 2.46 8519 92.02

dislocation 318 3.43 8837 95.45

trochanter pathology 122 1.32 8959 96.77

ectopic ossification 27 0.29 8986 97.06

fractured femur 232 2.51 9218 99.57

broken implant 40 0.43 9258 100.00

Number of previous revisions N=10`220

PREVIOUS REVISION

Page 8: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

PREVIOUS REVISION Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

no answer 352 3.44 352 3.44

none 7592 74.29 7944 77.73

1 1831 17.92 9775 95.65

2 394 3.86 10169 99.50

3 30 0.29 10199 99.79

4 13 0.13 10212 99.92

5 3 0.03 10215 99.95

OP elsewhere N=10`220

OP ELSEWHERE

OP ELSEWHERE Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

no answer 9520 93.15 9520 93.15

primary THA 531 5.20 10051 98.35

1 revision 45 0.44 10096 98.79

>1 revision 60 0.59 10156 99.37

primary THA & 1 revision 57 0.56 10213 99.93

Page 9: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

1 revision & >1 revision 7 0.07 10220 100.00

Specification of previous revisions

SPECIFICATION OF PREVIOUS REVISIONS

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

Socket only 1 544 22.33 544 22.33

Socket only 2 27 1.11 571 23.44

Socket only >2 5 0.21 576 23.65

Stem only 1 392 16.09 968 39.74

Stem only >1 21 0.86 989 40.60

Socket and Stem 1 1095 44.95 2084 85.55

Socket and Stem 2 337 13.83 2421 99.38

Socket and Stem >2 15 0.62 2436 100.00

Page 10: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Status contralateral hip N= 10`220

DIAGNOSIS OPPOSITE SIDE

DIAGNOSIS OPPOSITE SIDE

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

no answer 900 8.81 900 8.81

normal 4152 40.63 5052 49.43

abnormal, no OP 1116 10.92 6168 60.35

internal fixation 29 0.28 6197 60.64

osteotomy 75 0.73 6272 61.37

arthrodesis 35 0.34 6307 61.71

primary THR 2786 27.26 9093 88.97

double cup/ bipolar 6 0.06 9099 89.03

hemi-arthroplasty 49 0.48 9148 89.51

THA revision 1039 10.17 10187 99.68

Girdlestone 33 0.32 10220 100

Type of systemic illness (8855 illnesses in 5903 patients)

SYSTEMIC ILLNESS Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

Illness of nervous system 475 5.36 475 5.36

Page 11: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Illness of respiratory system 636 7.18 1111 12.55

Illness of venous system 475 5.36 1586 17.91

Illness of cardiovascular 2891 32.65 4477 50.56

Illness of gastro-intestinal system

815 9.20 5292 59.76

Illness of urological system 163 1.84 5455 61.60

Obesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05

Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14

Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00

Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness primary THA vs. Revision

Frequency Col Pct

Table of SYSTEMIC ILLNESS by OPERATION TYPE

OPERATION TYPE SYSTEMIC ILLNESS

Primary THA Revision

Total

Illness of nervous system 2709 5.99

475 5.36

3184

Illness of respiratory system 2928 6.47

636 7.18

3564

Page 12: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Illness of venous system 2709 5.99

475 5.36

3184

Illness of cardiovascular 14158 31.30

2891 32.65

17049

Illness of gastro-intestinal system 4252 9.40

815 9.20

5067

Illness of urological system 596 1.32

163 1.84

759

Obesity 8327 18.41

1633 18.44

9960

Diabetes 2495 5.52

451 5.09

2946

Other systemic illness 7057 15.60

1316 14.86

8373

Total 45231 8855 54086

Clinical evaluation of affected hip

Page 13: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Walking capacity restriction N= 10220

WALK CAPACITY

WALK CAPACITY Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

no answer 21 0.21 21 0.21

none 299 2.93 320 3.13

right hip 4049 39.62 4369 42.75

left hip 3604 35.26 7973 78.01

both hips 1946 19.04 9919 97.05

other 301 2.95 10220 100.00

…. Walking capacity restriction depending on revision side

Frequency Col Pct

Table of WALK CAPACITY by OP SIDE

OP SIDE WALK CAPACITY

Left Right

Total

none 151 3.11

148 2.77

299

right hip 18 0.37

4031 75.52

4049

Page 14: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

left hip 3589 73.83

15 0.28

3604

both hips 949 19.52

997 18.68

1946

other 154 3.17

147 2.75

301

Total 4861 5338 10199

Walking capacity restriction

SIDE L R

WALKCAPSIDE

R

L

other

both hips

left hip

right hip

none

other

both hips

left hip

right hip

none

Percent of Total Frequency

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Charnley Classification (4 levels, Röder et al. JOR 2006)

CHARNLEY Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

A 4835 52.41 4835 52.41

BB 3749 40.64 8584 93.05

B 382 4.14 8966 97.19

C 259 2.81 9225 100.00

Page 15: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Usual support needed N=1537

SUPPORT

SUPPORT Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

one cane/stick 624 40.60 624 40.60

one crutch 207 13.47 831 54.07

two canes/sticks 348 22.64 1179 76.71

two crutches 300 19.52 1479 96.23

walker 58 3.77 1537 100.00

Time walked with support N=6221

WALK WITH SUPPORT

WALK WITH SUPPORT Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

none needed 2417 38.85 2417 38.85

> 60 min. 277 4.45 2694 43.30

31-60 min. 1176 18.90 3870 62.21

10-30 min. 2351 37.79 6221 100.00

Page 16: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Time walked without support N= 9157

WALK W/O SUPPORT

WALK W/O SUPPORT Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

> 60 min. 750 8.19 750 8.19

31-60 min. 835 9.12 1585 17.31

10-30 min. 926 10.11 2511 27.42

< 10 min. 982 10.72 3493 38.15

not possible 5664 61.85 9157 100.00

Pain of the hip N=10`068

HIP PAIN

HIP PAIN Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

none 389 3.86 389 3.86

mild 1017 10.10 1406 13.97

moderate 3545 35.21 4951 49.18

Page 17: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

severe 5014 49.80 9965 98.98

intolerable 103 1.02 10068 100.00

Flexion range N=10`219

FLEXION RANGE

FLEXION RANGE Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

no answer 229 2.24 229 2.24

> 90° 2948 28.85 3177 31.09

71-90° 4655 45.55 7832 76.64

30-70° 1821 17.82 9653 94.46

< 30° 399 3.90 10052 98.37

stiff 167 1.63 10219 100.00

Flexion range depending on number of previous revisions

Frequency Col Pct

Page 18: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Table of FLEXION RANGE by PREVIOUS REVISION

PREVIOUS REVISION FLEXION RANGE

none 1 2 3 4 5 >5

Total

> 90° 2373 31.97

446 24.90

71 18.35

4 13.33

1 7.69

0 0.00

1 20.00

2896

71-90° 3477 46.85

846 47.24

186 48.06

12 40.00

5 38.46

0 0.00

1 20.00

4527

30-70° 1222 16.46

382 21.33

89 23.00

9 30.00

5 38.46

3 100.00

2 40.00

1712

< 30° 242 3.26

80 4.47

29 7.49

4 13.33

2 15.38

0 0.00

0 0.00

357

stiff 108 1.46

37 2.07

12 3.10

1 3.33

0 0.00

0 0.00

1 20.00

159

Total 7422 1791 387 30 13 3 5 9651

Frequency Missing = 1

Page 19: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Apparent leg length discrepancy (shorter)

LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

equal length 3635 35.57 3635 35.57

right 3407 33.34 7042 68.92

left 3176 31.08 10218 100.00

Comparison of leg length discrepancy preoperative by surgery side

Table of LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY by OP SIDE

OP SIDE LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY

Left Right

Total

equal length 1734 47.70

1901 52.30

3635

right shorter 436 12.80

2971 87.20

3407

left shorter 2704 85.14

472 14.86

3176

Total 4874 47.70

5344 52.30

10218 100.00

Frequency Missing = 2

Page 20: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Radiological Evaluation

Acetabular side migration (superior) N=7`261

AC MIGRATION SUPERIOR

AC MIGRATION SUPERIOR Frequency Percent Cumulative Frequency

CumulativePercent

0-4 mm 4417 60.83 4417 60.83

5-10 mm 2485 34.22 6902 95.06

>10 mm 170 2.34 7072 97.40

tilt of socket 189 2.60 7261 100.00

Page 21: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Acetabular side migration (medial) N= 1`438

AC MIGRATION MEDIAL

AC MIGRATION MEDIAL Frequency Percent Cumulative Frequency

CumulativePercent

protrusio 1120 77.89 1120 77.89

socket in pelvis 318 22.11 1438 100.00

Femoral side stem subsidence N=10`035

FEMORAL STEM SUB-SIDENCE

Frequency Percent Cumulative Frequency

CumulativePercent

none 7585 75.59 7585 75.59

1-3 mm 392 3.91 7977 79.49

4-9 mm 1893 18.86 9870 98.36

>9 mm 165 1.64 10035 100.00

Page 22: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Endosteal resorption N=741

RESORPTION

RESORPTION Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

Cavities <1 cm 312 42.11 312 42.11

Cavities >1 cm 233 31.44 545 73.55

extensive defect 196 26.45 741 100.00

Operation/ Prosthetic Components

Cup material

CUP MATERIAL

CUP MATERIAL

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

all PE 6431 76.40 6431 76.40

all CoCr 287 3.41 6718 79.81

metal backed 3 0.04 6721 79.85

PE+Sulmesh 480 5.70 7201 85.55

PE+CoCr surface

68 0.81 7269 86.36

Ceramic 17 0.20 7286 86.56

PE 923 10.97 8209 97.53

CoCr surface 125 1.49 8334 99.01

Page 23: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

other 83 0.99 8417 100.00

...chronological distribution of cup material

Frequency Row Pct Col Pct

Table of CUP MATERIAL by INTERVAL

INTERVAL CUP MATERIAL

1968 (1966-1970)

1973 (1971-1975)

1978 (1976-1980)

1983 (1981-1985)

1988 (1986-1990)

1993 (1991-1995)

1998 (1996-2000)

2003 (2001-2003)

Total

all PE 21 0.33 100.0

72 1.12 100.0

267 4.15 99.63

1319 20.51 96.70

2410 37.47 82.03

1681 26.14 73.99

575 8.94 49.36

86 1.34 60.56

6431

all CoCr 0 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00

29 10.10 2.13

169 58.89 5.75

82 28.57 3.61

6 2.09 0.52

1 0.35 0.70

287

PE+Sulmesh 0 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00

2 0.42 0.15

139 28.96 4.73

147 30.63 6.47

168 35.00 14.42

24 5.00 16.90

480

PE 0 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00

1 0.11 0.37

14 1.52 1.03

220 23.94 7.49

336 36.56 14.79

325 35.36 27.90

23 2.50 16.20

919

CoCr 0 0 0 0 0 26 91 8 125

Page 24: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

surface 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

20.80 1.14

72.80 7.81

6.40 5.63

Total 21 0.25

72 0.87

268 3.25

1364 16.55

2938 35.65

2272 27.57

1165 14.13

142 1.72

8242 100.00

Frequency Missing = 4

Acetabular Augmenation N= 8146

CUP AUGMENTATION

CUP AUGMEN-TATION

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

none 3148 38.64 3148 38.64

screws 132 1.62 3280 40.27

ARR 2501 30.70 5781 70.97

APC 739 9.07 6520 80.04

ARR with hook 487 5.98 7007 86.02

Titan 597 7.33 7604 93.35

alloys 5 0.06 7609 93.41

solid 21 0.26 7630 93.67

Page 25: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

central hole 214 2.63 7844 96.29

other 302 3.71 8146 100.00

Acetabular augmenation depending on number of pervious revisions

Frequency Col Pct

Table of CUP AUGMENTATION by PREVIOUS REVISION

PREVIOUS REVISION CUP AUGMENTATION

none 1 2 3 4 5 >5

Total

none 2415 38.75

512 38.61

95 34.55

2 9.52

1 11.11

1 50.00

2 66.67

3028

screws 92 1.48

31 2.34

3 1.09

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

126

Acetabular Reinforcement Ring

(ARR)

1955 31.37

367 27.68

74 26.91

5 23.81

3 33.33

0 0.00

0 0.00

2404

Antiprotusion Cage (APC)

502 8.05

151 11.39

57 20.73

7 33.33

2 22.22

0 0.00

0 0.00

719

ARR with hook 382 6.13

78 5.88

17 6.18

5 23.81

1 11.11

0 0.00

1 33.33

484

Page 26: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Titan 479 7.68

86 6.49

16 5.82

2 9.52

2 22.22

1 50.00

0 0.00

586

alloys 3 0.05

1 0.08

1 0.36

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

5

solid 16 0.26

4 0.30

1 0.36

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

21

central hole 163 2.62

41 3.09

3 1.09

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

207

other 226 3.63

55 4.15

8 2.91

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

289

Total 6233 1326 275 21 9 2 3 7869

Femoral head N=7`959

HEAD

HEAD Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

stainless 1237 15.54 1237 15.54

Cr/Co 3303 41.50 4540 57.04

Page 27: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Titanium 16 0.20 4556 57.24

Titanium coated

11 0.14 4567 57.38

Ceramic 3392 42.62 7959 100.00

...chronological distribution of femoral head material

Frequency Col Pct

Table of HEAD MATERIAL by INTERVAL

INTERVAL HEAD MATERIAL

1968 (1966-1970)

1973 (1971-1975)

1978 (1976-1980)

1983 (1981-1985)

1988 (1986-1990)

1993 (1991-1995)

1998 (1996-2000)

2003 (2001-2003)

Total

stainless 2 8.00

19 23.17

35 14.23

182 13.90

519 19.22

338 15.35

132 10.65

10 8.13

1237

Cr/Co 23 92.00

63 76.83

207 84.15

932 71.20

1078 39.91

591 26.84

376 30.32

33 26.83

3303

Ceramic 0 0.00

0 0.00

4 1.63

195 14.90

1104 40.87

1273 57.81

732 59.03

80 65.04

3388

Total 25

82

246 1309 2701 2202 1240 123 7928

Frequency Missing = 4

Page 28: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Stem material N=6793

STEM MATERIAL

STEM MATERIAL

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

stainless 805 11.85 805 11.85

casted CoCr 55 0.81 860 12.66

forged CoCr 3184 46.87 4044 59.53

Titanium alloy 2749 40.47 6793 100.00

...chronological distribution of stem material

Frequency Col Pct

Table of STEM MATERIAL by INTERVAL

Page 29: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

INTERVAL STEM MATERIAL

1968 (1966-1970)

1973 (1971-1975)

1978 (1976-1980)

1983 (1981-1985)

1988 (1986-1990)

1993 (1991-1995)

1998 (1996-2000)

2003 (2001-2003)

Total

no answer 30 100.00

87 90.63

283 88.71

665 41.93

784 23.16

871 30.22

610 35.95

97 43.89

3427

stainless 0 0.00

2 2.08

0 0.00

139 8.76

391 11.55

188 6.52

71 4.18

14 6.33

805

casted CoCr 0 0.00

0 0.00

1 0.31

0 0.00

0 0.00

20 0.69

30 1.77

4 1.81

55

forged CoCr 0 0.00

7 7.29

35 10.97

668 42.12

1383 40.86

758 26.30

301 17.74

28 12.67

3180

Titanium alloy

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

114 7.19

827 24.43

1045 36.26

685 40.37

78 35.29

2749

Total 30 96 319 1586 3385 2882 1697 221 10216

Frequency Missing = 4

Page 30: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Operation procedure

Revision of Components N=10220

COMPONENT REVISION

COMPONENT REVISION

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

none 299 2.93 299 2.93

both components 5320 52.05 5619 54.98

only socket 2743 26.84 8362 81.82

only stem 1607 15.72 9969 97.54

Girdlestone 251 2.46 10220 100.00

Page 31: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Revisions of components because of aseptic loosening

Table of OP REVISION by DIAGNOSIS ASEPTIC LOOSENING

DIAGNOSIS OP REVISION

ASEPTIC LOOSENING

OTHER DIAGNOSIS

Total

none 42 15.56

228 84.44

270

both components

3941 84.41

728 15.59

4669

only socket 2293 88.40

301 11.60

2594

only stem 1304 85.51

221 14.49

1525

implant removal

61 30.50

139 69.50

200

Total 7641 82.53

1617 17.47

9258 100.00

Page 32: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Fixation of components N=10`220

COMPONENT FIXATION

COMPONENT FIXATION

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

no answer 230 2.25 230 2.25

all cemented 5087 49.77 5317 52.03

all uncemented 2251 22.03 7568 74.05

hybrid 942 9.22 8510 83.27

reverse hybrid 1177 11.52 9687 94.78

no implant 533 5.22 10220 100.00

Page 33: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Other operations (reduction, trochanter; others) N=2`327

OTHER OP Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

Closed Reduction 5 0.21 5 0.21

Open Reduction 49 2.11 54 2.32

Trochanter Refixation

178 7.65 232 9.97

Trochanter Relocation

13 0.56 245 10.53

excision ossification

1676 72.02 1921 82.55

internal fixation 50 2.15 1971 84.70

femoral osteotomy 48 2.06 2019 86.76

wound drainage 27 1.16 2046 87.92

other 281 12.08 2327 100.00

Acetabular reconstruction with bone graft N=10`219

BONE GRAFT

BONE GRAFT Frequency Percent Cumulative Frequency

CumulativePercent

no answer 2102 20.57 2102 20.57

Page 34: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

none 3232 31.63 5334 52.20

fresh autologous 1030 10.08 6364 62.28

frozen allograft 3371 32.99 9735 95.26

freezedried bone 134 1.31 9869 96.58

fresh autologous & frozen allograft

331 3.24 10200 99.81

fresh autologous & freezedried bone

15 0.15 10215 99.96

frozen allograft & freezedried bone

3 0.03 10218 99.99

fresh autologous & frozen allograft & freezedried bone

1 0.01 10219 100.00

Calcar defect N=2`316

CALCAR DEFECT

CALCAR DEFECT

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

>5 mm 1636 70.64 1636 70.64

to lesser trochanter

509 21.98 2145 92.62

including lesser trochanter

171 7.38 2316 100.00

Page 35: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Femoral Cortex N=3`085

FEMORAL CORTEX

FEMORAL CORTEX

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

normal 590 19.12 590 19.12

thin 2239 72.58 2829 91.70

defects 113 3.66 2942 95.36

atrophic 33 1.07 2975 96.43

thin & defects 53 1.72 3028 98.15

thin & atrophic 26 0.84 3054 99.00

defects & atrophic 10 0.32 3064 99.32

thin & defects & atrophic

21 0.68 3085 100.00

Page 36: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Extraction cement N=4`717

EXTRACTION CEMENT

EXTRACTION CEMENT

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

without window 3688 78.19 3688 78.19

with window 525 11.13 4213 89.32

with femoral osteotomy

504 10.68 4717 100.00

Fixation of greater trochanter N=5`883

FIXATION GREAT

TROCHANTER

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

one wire 1305 22.18 1305 22.18

several wires 640 10.88 1945 33.06

screws 318 5.41 2263 38.47

screws & wire 26 0.44 2289 38.91

muscle reinsertion 3594 61.09 5883 100.00

Page 37: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Anteversion of stem N=1`423

ANTEVERSION

ANTEVERSION Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

retroversion 3 0.21 3 0.21

<10° 446 31.34 449 31.55

10-15° 959 67.39 1408 98.95

>15° 15 1.05 1423 100.00

Perioperative Complications N=10`221

PEROP COMPLICATION

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

none 8614 84.28 8614 84.28

perforation 369 3.61 8983 87.89

proximal Fx 643 6.29 9626 94.18

distal Fx 24 0.23 9650 94.41

Fx of trochanter 231 2.26 9881 96.67

tendency to dislocate

154 1.51 10035 98.18

vascular 44 0.43 10079 98.61

pelvic perforation 81 0.79 10160 99.40

other 61 0.60 10221 100.00

Page 38: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Treatment of Complications N=10`249

TREATMENT OF COMPLICATIONS

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

None 9231 90.07 9231 90.07

Wiring 573 5.59 9804 95.66

Screw 70 0.68 9874 96.34

Plate 89 0.87 9963 97.21

Femoral osteotomy 158 1.54 10121 98.75

Vascular repair 51 0.50 10172 99.25

Change acetabular component

1 0.01 10173 99.26

Change femoral component

8 0.08 10181 99.34

Change both components

2 0.02 10183 99.36

Other 66 0.64 10249 100.00

Page 39: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Duration of procedure (time) N=10`220

OP TIME

OP TIME Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

no answer 294 2.88 294 2.88

<1 1/2h 1446 14.15 1740 17.03

1 1/2 - 2 1/4h 3723 36.43 5463 53.45

2 1/4 - 3h 3279 32.08 8742 85.54

3 - 4h 1245 12.18 9987 97.72

>4h 233 2.28 10220 100.00

Page 40: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Anesthesia N=10`220

ANAESTHESIA

ANAESTHESIA Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

no answer 343 3.36 343 3.36

general 4247 41.56 4590 44.91

hypotensive 466 4.56 5056 49.47

spinal 3653 35.74 8709 85.22

epidural 1505 14.73 10214 99.94

other 6 0.06 10220 100.00

... chronological distribution of Anesthesia

Frequency Col Pct

Table of ANESTHESIA by INTERVAL

INTERVAL Total ANES-THESI

A 1968 (1966

-1970)

1973 (1971

-1975)

1978 (1976

-1980)

1983 (1981

-1985)

1988 (1986

-1990)

1993 (1991

-1995)

1998 (1996

-2000)

2003 (2001

-2003)

no answer

14 46.67

4 4.17

6 1.88

94 5.93

179 5.29

42 1.46

4 0.24

0 0.00

343

general 16 68 113 613 1552 1067 703 111 4243

Page 41: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

53.33 70.83 35.42 38.65 45.85 37.02 41.43 50.23

Hypo-tensive

0 0.00

22 22.92

144 45.14

159 10.03

57 1.68

56 1.94

26 1.53

2 0.90

466

spinal 0 0.00

2 2.08

32 10.03

524 33.04

1054 31.14

1217 42.23

738 43.49

86 38.91

3653

Epi-dural

0 0.00

0 0.00

24 7.52

196 12.36

543 16.04

499 17.31

221 13.02

22 9.95

1505

other 0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

1 0.03

5 0.29

0 0.00

6

Total 30

96

319

1586

3385

2882

1697

221

10216

Frequency Missing = 4

Hospital Course

Postoperative treatment/ after Operation N=9`976

POSTOP TREATMENT

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

Simple bedrest 9159 91.81 9159 91.81

Traction 786 7.88 9945 99.69

Page 42: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

cast 31 0.31 9976 100.00

Intensive care N=10`220

INTENSIVE CARE

INTENSIVE CARE Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

no answer 9791 95.80 9791 95.80

1-2 days 410 4.01 10201 99.81

>2 days 19 0.19 10220 100.00

Prophylaxis N= 9`824 (Hips)

PROPHYLAXIS Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

Prophylaxis of heterotopic ossification

678 3.72 678 3.72

Prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis

9586 52.64 10264 56.36

Prophylaxis of infection

7948 43.64 18212 100.00

Page 43: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

...chronological distribution of prophylaxis

Frequency Col Pct

Table of PROPHYLAXIS by INTERVAL

INTERVAL PROPHY-LAXIS

1968 (1966

-1970)

1973 (1971

-1975)

1978 (1976

-1980)

1983 (1981

-1985)

1988 (1986

-1990)

1993 (1991

-1995)

1998 (1996

-2000)

2003 (2001

-2003)

Total

Prophy-laxis of

heterotopic

ossification

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

1 0.02

148 2.76

381 11.63

144 27.12

674

Prophy-laxis of

deep vein thrombosi

s

4 80.00

88 73.95

235 68.12

1478 59.67

3315 54.41

2750 51.36

1507 46.00

205 38.61

9582

Prophy-laxis of

infection

1 20.00

31 26.05

110 31.88

999 40.33

2777 45.58

2456 45.87

1388 42.37

182 34.27

7944

Total 5

119

345

2477 6093

5354

3276

531

18200

Frequency Missing = 12

Page 44: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Systemic complications N=1`494

SYSTEMIC COMPLICATIONS

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

none 92 6.16 92 6.16

deep thrombosis 84 5.62 176 11.78

pulmonary emboly 301 20.15 477 31.93

cardiovascular 162 10.84 639 42.77

respiratpry 210 14.06 849 56.83

gastrointestinal 320 21.42 1169 78.25

urological 129 8.63 1298 86.88

CNS 196 13.12 1494 100.00

Page 45: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Local complication N=10`310

LOCAL COMPLICATION

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

none 8634 83.74 8634 83.74

haematoma 908 8.81 9542 92.55

dislocation 299 2.90 9841 95.45

neuropraxia 124 1.20 9965 96.65

wound dehiscence 94 0.91 10059 97.57

superficial infection 80 0.78 10139 98.34

deep infection 90 0.87 10229 99.21

sinus infection 33 0.32 10262 99.53

other 48 0.47 10310 100.00

Page 46: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Revision N=10`220

REVISION

REVISION Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

no 10128 99.10 10128 99.10

yes 92 0.90 10220 100.00

Discharge Status

Distribution of …..

Hip pain N=10`219

DISCHARGE HIP PAIN

DISCHARGE HIP PAIN Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

no answer 134 1.31 134 1.31

none 5588 54.68 5722 55.99

mild 3970 38.85 9692 94.84

Page 47: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

severe 30 0.29 10219 100.00

Other pain N=10`220

OTHER PAIN

OTHER PAIN Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

no 9980 97.65 9980 97.65

yes 240 2.35 10220 100.00

Flexion at discharge N=10`219

DISCHARGE FLEXION

DISCHARGE FLEXION Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

no answer 155 1.52 155 1.52

>90° 1884 18.44 2039 19.95

71-90° 6296 61.61 8335 81.56

30-70 1765 17.27 10100 98.84

<30° 119 1.16 10219 100.00

Page 48: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Comparison flexion range preoperativ and flexion range at discharge

Frequency Row pct

Table of PREOP FLEXION by DISCHARGE FLEXION

DISCHARGE FLEXION PREOP FLEXION(MFLEXION)

>90° 71-90° 30-70 <30°

Total

> 90° 865 29.48

1770 60.33

281 9.58

18 0.61

2934

71-90° 760 16.48

3113 67.50

712 15.44

27 0.59

4612

30-70° 188 10.47

1057 58.89

517 28.80

33 1.84

1795

< 30° 29 7.44

186 47.69

153 39.23

22 5.64

390

stiff 10 6.13

82 50.31

62 38.04

9 5.52

163

Total 1852 6208 1725 109 9894

Frequency Missing = 2

Apparent leg length discrepancy (shorter) N=10`216

LEG LENGTH DIS-CREPANCY

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

Page 49: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

equal length 9825 96.17 9825 96.17

right 194 1.90 10019 98.07

left 197 1.93 10216 100.00

Comparison leg length discrepancy preoperative – postoperative

Frequency Row pct

Table of LEG LENGHT DISCREPANCY PREOP by LEG LENGHT DISCREPANCY _POSTOP

LEG LENGHT DISCREPANCY POSTOP

LEG LENGHT DISCREPANCY PREOP

equal length

right shorter

left shorter

Total

equal length 3544 97.58

43 1.18

45 1.24

3632

right shorter 3273 96.07

111 3.26

23 0.68

3407

left shorter 3007 94.71

39 1.23

129 4.06

3175

Total 9824 193 197 10214

Frequency Missing = 6

Page 50: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

X-Ray acetabular component at discharge

Inclination (abduction) N=9`025

DISCHARGE INCLINATION

DISCHARGE INCLINATION

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

CumulativePercent

<35° 32 0.35 32 0.35

35° 988 10.95 1020 11.30

40° 3288 36.43 4308 47.73

45° 4111 45.55 8419 93.29

50° 592 6.56 9011 99.84

>50° 14 0.16 9025 100.00

Anteversion N=9`010

DISCHARGE ANTEVERSION

DISCHARGE ANTEVERSION

Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

CumulativePercent

retroversion 47 0.52 47 0.52

<10° 2991 33.20 3038 33.72

10°-15° 5736 63.66 8774 97.38

>15° 236 2.62 9010 100.00

Page 51: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

X-Ray femoral component at discharge

Position of the stem N=8`307

STEM POSITION

STEM POSITION Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

neutral 7545 90.83 7545 90.83

valgus 313 3.77 7858 94.59

varus 449 5.41 8307 100.00

Cement in femur N=5`592

FEMUR CEMENT

FEMUR CEMENT Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

above tip 303 5.42 303 5.42

below tip <2cm 4103 73.37 4406 78.79

below tip >2cm 1186 21.21 5592 100.00

Page 52: IDES REVISION (B) THA RevisionObesity 1633 18.44 7088 80.05 Diabetes 451 5.09 7539 85.14 Other systemic illness 1316 14.86 8855 100.00 Comparison distribution of type of systemic illness

Greater trochanter N=8`910

GREAT TROCHANTER

GREAT TROCHANTER Frequency Percent CumulativeFrequency

Cumulative Percent

in situ 8532 95.76 8532 95.76

displaced 201 2.26 8733 98.01

broken 177 1.99 8910 100.00