Identification of microRNA expression pro of … and digestive function, the amphioxus gill is...

6
LETTER Identication of microRNA expression proles in the gill, intestine and hepatic caecum of Branchiostoma belcheri Dear Editor, The origin of vertebrate-specic characters and functional systems is one of the most important questions in the evo- lutionary biology (Holland and Chen, 2001). Amphioxus, the most basal chordate, is considered as the sister of verte- brates based on the recent molecular phylogenetic evi- dences, and it is used as an ideal model organism to study the origin and evolution of vertebrate organ systems including immune system (Yu and Holland, 2009). Three digestive organs, gill slits, hepatic caecum and intestine in amphioxus were also considered as primitive immune organs of amphioxus (Schmitz et al., 2000). In addition to the respiratory and digestive function, the amphioxus gill is regarded as the rst immune defense organand plays a natural immune defense role by working as a physical bar- rier. The intestine is serving as a site of continuous immunological interaction (Yuan et al., 2015). Meanwhile, the hepatic caecum of amphioxus, as a prototype of the vertebrate liver, is also considered as a potential immuno- logical organ in the amphioxus, playing an important role in acute phase response (APR) (Wang and Zhang, 2011). The immune responsive cells including lymphocyte-like cells and macrophage-like cells were found in the gill and intestine of amphioxus, respectively (Huang et al., 2011). Furthermore, the conserved molecules and signaling pathways involved in innate immune system were also identied in these organs in the amphioxus (Huang et al., 2011). Though the importance of these organs in digestive system and the value of these tissues for study of immune system evolution are demon- strated (Yuan et al., 2015), the molecular characters of these tissues are not revealed comprehensively. To date, whole genome have been sequenced for two amphioxus species B. oridae and B. belcheri, and tissue- specic transcriptome of B. belcheri have been sequenced recently (unpublished, http://wcy.pkusulab.com). Meanwhile, a number of researches around noncoding RNAs in amphioxus were published. The miRNAs are a class of endogenous noncoding RNAs with approximately 22 nucleotides, and play important role in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. The global expression of miRNAs in the whole amphioxus is being revealed (Chen et al., 2009). However, the expression pattern of miRNAs in the amphioxus is not yet discovered. As a starting point to ll in this knowledge gap, here we investigate the expression proles of miRNAs in the three digestive and immune-related organs: gill, intestine and hepatic caecum. To reveal the expression patterns of miRNAs in these organs, we utilized a μParao-microuidic chip-microarray screen performed by LC Sciences (Hangzhou, PR China). In two independent replicates, we calculate the number of miRNAs with microarray signal intensity greater than 50 in each organ based on 272 target probes from B. belcheri and B. oridae, and identied 138 miRNAs uniquely expressed in the gill, 127 miRNAs in the intestine and 107 miRNAs in the hepatic caecum, 114 miRNAs in both gill and intestine, 53 miRNAs in both gill and hepatic caecum, 45 miRNAs in both intestine and hepatic caecum, and 42 miRNAs in all three organs, a Venn diagram is shown in Fig. S1. The miRNA microarray data were deposited to NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession number GSE87094. To overview the global expression patterns of miRNAs in these three organs, we generated a heatmap including all miRNAs in our microarray chip (Fig. 1A). Further analysis of the heatmap showed eight different expression trends of miRNAs in these three organs (Fig. 1BI). These different expression trends of miRNAs suggest a dynamic expression prole of miRNAs in distinct organs. Interestingly, the hierarchical cluster and statistical analysis showed that the miRNA expression pattern of gill and intestine is close to each other as compared to the expression pattern of hepatic caecum and intestine or the expression pattern of hepatic caecum and gill. The previous reports indicated that several innate immune-related genes have parallel expression pat- tern in the gill and the intestine before and after immune stimulation (Yuan et al., 2009), which may suggest that these two organs act as the rst line of immune defense and share responsibility for immune response. On the other hand, the hepatic caecum is also considered as part of the digestive system and involved in immune responses. But, hepatic caecum primarily acts as a homological organ of liver, which is different to the gill or the intestine. Thus, its not surprise © The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn Protein Cell 2017, 8(4):302307 DOI 10.1007/s13238-016-0365-3 Protein & Cell Protein & Cell

Transcript of Identification of microRNA expression pro of … and digestive function, the amphioxus gill is...

LETTER

Identification of microRNA expression profilesin the gill, intestine and hepatic caecumof Branchiostoma belcheri

Dear Editor,

The origin of vertebrate-specific characters and functionalsystems is one of the most important questions in the evo-lutionary biology (Holland and Chen, 2001). Amphioxus, themost basal chordate, is considered as the sister of verte-brates based on the recent molecular phylogenetic evi-dences, and it is used as an ideal model organism to studythe origin and evolution of vertebrate organ systemsincluding immune system (Yu and Holland, 2009). Threedigestive organs, gill slits, hepatic caecum and intestine inamphioxus were also considered as primitive immuneorgans of amphioxus (Schmitz et al., 2000). In addition to therespiratory and digestive function, the amphioxus gill isregarded as “the first immune defense organ” and plays anatural immune defense role by working as a physical bar-rier. The intestine is serving as a site of continuousimmunological interaction (Yuan et al., 2015). Meanwhile,the hepatic caecum of amphioxus, as a prototype of thevertebrate liver, is also considered as a potential immuno-logical organ in the amphioxus, playing an important role inacute phase response (APR) (Wang and Zhang, 2011). Theimmune responsive cells including lymphocyte-like cells andmacrophage-like cells were found in the gill and intestine ofamphioxus, respectively (Huang et al., 2011). Furthermore,the conserved molecules and signaling pathways involved ininnate immune system were also identified in these organs inthe amphioxus (Huang et al., 2011). Though the importanceof these organs in digestive system and the value of thesetissues for study of immune system evolution are demon-strated (Yuan et al., 2015), the molecular characters of thesetissues are not revealed comprehensively.

To date, whole genome have been sequenced for twoamphioxus species B. floridae and B. belcheri, and tissue-specific transcriptome of B. belcheri have been sequencedrecently (unpublished, http://wcy.pkusulab.com). Meanwhile,a number of researches around noncoding RNAs inamphioxus were published. The miRNAs are a class ofendogenous noncoding RNAs with approximately 22nucleotides, and play important role in post-transcriptionalregulation of gene expression. The global expression of

miRNAs in the whole amphioxus is being revealed (Chenet al., 2009). However, the expression pattern of miRNAs inthe amphioxus is not yet discovered. As a starting point to fillin this knowledge gap, here we investigate the expressionprofiles of miRNAs in the three digestive and immune-relatedorgans: gill, intestine and hepatic caecum.

To reveal the expression patterns of miRNAs in theseorgans, we utilized a μParaflo-microfluidic chip-microarrayscreen performed by LC Sciences (Hangzhou, PR China). Intwo independent replicates, we calculate the number ofmiRNAs with microarray signal intensity greater than 50 ineach organ based on 272 target probes from B. belcheri andB. floridae, and identified 138 miRNAs uniquely expressed inthe gill, 127 miRNAs in the intestine and 107 miRNAs in thehepatic caecum, 114 miRNAs in both gill and intestine, 53miRNAs in both gill and hepatic caecum, 45 miRNAs in bothintestine and hepatic caecum, and 42 miRNAs in all threeorgans, a Venn diagram is shown in Fig. S1. The miRNAmicroarray data were deposited to NCBI Gene ExpressionOmnibus (GEO) database under accession numberGSE87094. To overview the global expression patterns ofmiRNAs in these three organs, we generated a heatmapincluding all miRNAs in our microarray chip (Fig. 1A). Furtheranalysis of the heatmap showed eight different expressiontrends of miRNAs in these three organs (Fig. 1B–I). Thesedifferent expression trends of miRNAs suggest a dynamicexpression profile of miRNAs in distinct organs. Interestingly,the hierarchical cluster and statistical analysis showed thatthe miRNA expression pattern of gill and intestine is close toeach other as compared to the expression pattern of hepaticcaecum and intestine or the expression pattern of hepaticcaecum and gill. The previous reports indicated that severalinnate immune-related genes have parallel expression pat-tern in the gill and the intestine before and after immunestimulation (Yuan et al., 2009), which may suggest that thesetwo organs act as the first line of immune defense and shareresponsibility for immune response. On the other hand, thehepatic caecum is also considered as part of the digestivesystem and involved in immune responses. But, hepaticcaecum primarily acts as a homological organ of liver, whichis different to the gill or the intestine. Thus, it’s not surprise

© The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn

Protein Cell 2017, 8(4):302–307DOI 10.1007/s13238-016-0365-3 Protein&Cell

Protein

&Cell

that the miRNAs in hepatic caecum has a relative differentexpression pattern as compared to the gill or the intestine.

To further explore the expression pattern of miRNAs, thedifference of expression levels of miRNAs in paired organswas compared. The expression levels of miRNAs with

significant differences in two organs are shown in Table S2.Our analysis showed that there are 67 miRNAs with higherexpression levels and 47 miRNAs with lower or no expres-sion in gill as compared to the hepatic caecum (Table S2).Meanwhile, 45 miRNAs are abundantly present and 49

A B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

1 2 3 1 2 3

1 2

-1.15 0

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

Figure 1. The expression profile of miRNAs in different organs of amphioxus. (A) Heatmap illustrates the expression levels of

miRNAs in the intestine (1), the gill (2) and the hepatic caecum (3). The expression levels were represented by a color scale with

green as the lowest expression and red as the highest expression. Based on the expression profile of miRNAs, the hierarchy cluster

analysis was applied and eight different expression trends were labeled as C1 to C8. (B–I) The eight expression trends (C1 to C8) as

indicated in (A) were plotted with the expression values of individual miRNAs. The horizontal line in the middle indicates the middle

expression level. The miRNAs above the line are considered as high expression levels and the miRNAs below the line are considered

as low expression levels. The expression levels of miRNAs are: 1) high in the intestine but low in the gill and hepatic caecum (B); 2)

high in both the intestine and hepatic caecum (C); 3) low in the intestine but high in both the gill and hepatic caecum (D); 4) low in the

intestine, medium in the gill and high in the hepatic caecum (E); 5) low in both the intestine and gill but high in the hepatic caecum (F);

6) low in the intestine, high in the gill and medium in the hepatic caecum (G); 7) high in both the intestine and gill, and low in the

hepatic caecum (H); 8) medium in the intestine, high in the gill and low in the hepatic caecum (I).

Characterization of microRNA expression in amphioxus organs LETTER

© The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn 303

Protein

&Cell

miRNAs are poorly expressed in hepatic caecum as com-pared to the intestine (Table S2). Interestingly, there are only15 miRNAs with higher expression and 13 miRNAs withlower or no expression in the gill as compared to the intes-tine (Table S2).

For those miRNAs with significant expression difference,we then focused on miRNAs identified from B. belcheri (bbe)and B. floridae (bfl). This analysis showed that 20 miRNAsexpressed higher and 11 miRNAs lower in the gill as com-pared to the hepatic caecum (Fig. 2A). Eight miRNAsshowed abundant expression in intestine as compared to thehepatic caecum and 14 miRNAs are expressed highly inhepatic caecum as compared to the intestine (Fig. 2B). Inaddition, 2 miRNAs and 4 miRNAs are highly expressed inthe gill and the intestine, respectively (Fig. 2C). Takentogether, these data demonstrate that there are groups ofmiRNAs with abundant expression in one tissue but not inanother tissue, which may suggest the probability of exis-tence of tissue-specific miRNAs in distinct organs.

Next, 18 miRNAs with significant expression differencewere selected for further validation using quantitative RT-PCR. These miRNAs are identified from B. belcheri orB. floridae in the microarray screen, and since B. belcheriand B. floridae are closely relative animals from one genus,a part of miRNAs share identical sequences (88 miRNAssharing identical sequences between the two species inmiRBase release v21.0, see details in Table S3), then weunified the IDs to B. belcheri miRNA IDs when the selectedmiRNAs share identical sequences between the two species(Table S3). We examined the expression levels of selected18 miRNAs in six different tissues from B. belcheri includingthe gill, intestine, hepatic caecum, muscle, notochord andovary (Figs. 2D–K and S2). Interestingly, some miRNAsshowed very specific expression pattern in one tissue but notother tissues that are examined here. For example, bbe-miR-92c-3p has a significant high expression in the gill but not inother 5 tissues (Fig. 2D). The bbe-miR-4869-5p, bbe-miR-375-3p and bbe-miR-29a-3p are abundant in the intestinebut not others (Fig. 2E, 2H and 2I), and bbe-miR-4867-3pand bbe-miR-182b-5p are highly expressed in the hepaticcaecum (Fig. 2F and 2G). Unexpectedly, we also identify amiRNA, bbe-miR-200b-3p, significant with high expressionin the ovary (Fig. 2J). In addition, there are also somemiRNAs with particular high expression in 2 tissues but notin other 4 tissues. Specifically, bbe-miR-2071-5p is abundantin both the gill and the notochord (Fig. 2K). These resultsthus provide evidences that some miRNAs could specificallyexpress in a certain tissue among the six tissues weexamined.

Among these miRNAs, bbe-miR-92c-3p, bbe-miR-182b-5p, bbe-miR-200b-3p, bbe-375-3p and bbe-miR-29a-3p arewell evolutionally conserved among species according to thealignment analysis of their sequences on miRBase website(http://www.mirbase.org/). The homologies of these miRNAs

have been found to play important roles in specific tissues.For example, miR-17∼92, the homology of bbe-miR-92c-3p,has been implicated in the regulation of respiratory systemdevelopment including embryonic lung development (Luet al., 2007), which is consistent with its high expression inthe gill of the amphioxus. As a high expression miRNA in theprimitive liver of the amphioxus, the homology of bbe-miR-182b-5p has been reported to be involved in liver metastasis,liver injury and inflammation (Blaya et al., 2016). Additionally,although miR-375 was originally reported to be a pancreasislet cell-specific miRNA, it is also expressed in the gas-trointestinal organs and abnormally regulated in the gastriccancer and colorectal cancer (Song and Ajani, 2013). Sincethere is no published data about pancreas-like organ inamphioxus, the expression pattern of bbe-miR-375-3p mightgive us a hint that the original function of miR-375 is regu-lating mRNA expression in digestive organs, and thenevolved the function of regulating insulin secretion in pan-creas. Interestingly, we also found several tissue-specificmiRNAs including bbe-miR-4869-5p, bbe-miR-4867-3p andbbe-miR-2071-5p in the context of the six tissues weinvestigated, are solely expressed in the amphioxus basedon miRBase database. These miRNAs may represent miR-NAs having transient roles in regulating functions of specifictissues during evolution.

To uncover the potential roles of miRNAs during theevolution of complicated immune system, the role of indi-vidual miRNA in the amphioxus is beginning to be explored.For example, it was found that bbe-miR-92d regulates thecomplement pathway through targeting C3 for controlling theacute immune response to bacterial infections in amphioxus(Yang et al., 2013). In addition, the tissue-expression patternof C3 correlated well with the pattern of bbe-miR-92, implyinga functional association between C3 and miR-92 in theimmune organs of amphioxus (Yang et al., 2013). This studyemphasizes the role of miRNAs in immune regulation of theamphioxus. Interestingly, a couple of the tissue-specificmiRNAs in amphioxus discovered in our study, have alsobeen found to play important roles in immune regulation. Forexample, hsa-miR-92a-3p (homology of bbe-miR-92c-3p)negatively regulates Toll-like receptor (TLR)-triggeredinflammatory response in macrophages (Lai et al., 2013). Asthe human homology of bbe-miR-29a-3p, hsa-miR-29a-3ppromotes lipid uptake during monocyte-macrophage differ-entiation (Wang et al., 2015). And, the hsa-miR-375-3p(homology of bbe-miR-375-3p) has an important role inepithelium immune system by regulating goblet cell differ-entiation (Biton et al., 2011). Given their specific expressionpattern in the amphioxus, their conservations betweenamphioxus and human, and the crucial functions of theirhuman homologies in the immune system, it’s reasonable topropose that these miRNAs may participate in shaping the“pre immune system” in the amphioxus, and play conservedroles during immune system evolution.

LETTER Xin Liao et al.

304 © The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn

Protein

&Cell

bfl-miR-92b-3p 20.86 22.6321.9720.8620.4518.2116.39

7.632.67

16.018.81

20.2019.3618.5116.5616.1815.7815.4815.4015.3714.5514.1613.4413.1412.6412.1910.118.165.392.63

-6.20

-5.24-5.60-8.67

-6.84-8.32-9.28-9.52-11.20-11.74

-11.00-12.89-12.92-13.19-15.24-15.27-15.49-16.24-18.40-18.86-20.03

-1.20-1.26-2.90-3.40

-13.69-15.10-18.89-20.23

bfl-miR-182b-3p

bfl-miR-9-5p

bfl-miR-200b

bfl-miR-190

bfl-miR-4887

bfl-miR-137

bfl-miR-129a-5p

bfl-miR-29a-3p

bfl-miR-2062-5p

bfl-miR-2068-5p

bfl-miR-4869-3p

bfl-miR-4864-3p

bbe-miR-4865-3p

bfl-miR-4875b-5p

bfl-miR-184-5p

bfl-miR-100-5p

bfl-miR-217

bfl-miR-4877

bfl-miR-4867bfl-miR-4906

bfl-miR-4895bfl-miR-4905bfl-miR-4885

bfl-let-7b

bbe-miR-2064-5p

bbe-miR-182b-5pbfl-miR-4885bfl-miR-4905

bfl-miR-4878bfl-miR-4889a

bfl-miR-4904-5p

bfl-miR-4859-5pbfl-miR-100-5p

bfl-miR-9-5pbbe-miR-92d-5pbfl-miR-2068-5pbfl-miR-4869-3p

bbe-miR-2064-5p

bbe-miR-2071-5p

bfl-miR-125a-3pbfl-miR-4859-3pbbe-miR-10a-5pbbe-miR-4869-5p

bfl-miR-2062-5pbfl-miR-29a-3p

bfl-miR-92c

bfl-miR-4887

bfl-miR-200b

bfl-let-7b

bfl-miR-4864-3pbbe-miR-2058-3pbfl-miR-4880

bbe-miR-2071-3p

bbe-miR-92c-3p

bbe-miR-92c-3p

bbe-miR-200b-3p

bbe-miR-133a-5pbbe-miR-34h-5p

A B

C

miRNA name miRNA name

miRNA name

log2(gill/hepatic caecum) log2(intestine/hepatic caecum)

log2(gill/intestine)

D E

bbe-

miR

-92c

-3p

bbe-

miR

-486

9-5p

15

10

5

0

80

60

40

20

0

Gill

Intes

tine

Hepati

c cae

cum

Muscle

Ovary

Notoch

ord Gill

Intes

tine

Hepati

c cae

cum

Muscle

Ovary

Notoch

ord

Figure 2. Statistical analysis the expression difference of miRNAs in paired organs of amphioxus, and validation of the

expression of tissue-specific miRNAs. The relative expression levels of miRNAs identified from the B. floridae and B. belcheri were

statistically compared using the Student’s t test. The miRNAs with significant difference in the comparisons of gill versus hepatic

caecum (A), intestine versus hepatic caecum (B) and gill versus intestine (C) were shown. The red color indicates high expression of

miRNAs in the organs listed as the numerator and the blue indicates high expression of miRNAs in the organ listed as the

denominator. The quantitative PCR results of the expression of the following miRNAs in the gill, intestine, muscle, hepatic caecum,

notochord and ovary were shown: bbe-miR-92c-3p (D), bbe-miR-4869-5p (E), bbe-miR-4867-3p (F), bbe-miR-182b-5p (G), bbe-miR-

375-3p (H), bbe-miR-29a-3p (I), bbe-miR-200b-3p (J) and bbe-miR-2071-5p (K). The data are expressed as a ratio to the expression

level of U6 and are plotted as the means ± SD. (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

Characterization of microRNA expression in amphioxus organs LETTER

© The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn 305

Protein

&Cell

In summary, this study provides a systemic analysis ofthe expression of miRNAs in three different digestiveorgans that are associated with immune system evolution,and identifies a set of miRNAs with tissue-specific expres-sion patterns. These results form a basis to further studythe function of miRNAs in specific tissues and duringevolution.

FOOTNOTES

We thank three anonymous reviewers for providing invaluable

comments. This work was supported by the National Basic

Research Program (973 Program) (No. 2013CB835300). We thank

Miss Xiuzhen Li and Haiping Li from Beihai Marine Station for

culturing amphioxus.

F

H I

J K

G

bbe-

miR

-486

7-3p

bbe-

miR

-182

b-5p

bbe-

miR

-375

-3p

bbe-

miR

-29a

-3p

bbe-

miR

-200

b-3p

bbe-

miR

-207

1-5p

150

100

Gill

Intes

tine

Hepati

c cae

cum

Muscle

Ovary

Notoch

ord Gill

Intes

tine

Hepati

c cae

cum

Muscle

Ovary

Notoch

ord

Gill

Intes

tine

Hepati

c cae

cum

Muscle

Ovary

Notoch

ord Gill

Intes

tine

Hepati

c cae

cum

Muscle

Ovary

Notoch

ord

Gill

Intes

tine

Hepati

c cae

cum

Muscle

Ovary

Notoch

ord Gill

Intes

tine

Hepati

c cae

cum

Muscle

Ovary

Notoch

ord

40302010

0

50

40

30

20

10

0

40

30

20

10

0

40

30

20

10

0

40

30

20

10

0

10

8

6

4

2

0

Figure 2. continued.

LETTER Xin Liao et al.

306 © The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn

Protein

&Cell

Xin Liao, Liu Yang, Xi Chen and Juanyuan Chen declare that

they have no conflict of interest. All institutional and national

guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals are followed.

Xin Liao1,2, Liu Yang3, Xi Chen5, Junyuan Chen2,4&

1 School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093,

China2 Beihai Marine Station of Evo-Devo Institute, Nanjing University,

Nanjing 210093, China3 Department of Biomedical Research Center, The First People’s

Hospital of Kunming, Kunming 650011, China4 Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Nanjing 210008,

China5 State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Jiangsu

Engineering Research Center for MicroRNA Biology and

Biotechnology, NJU Advanced Institute for Life Sciences (NAILS),

School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093,

China

& Correspondence: [email protected] (J. Chen)

OPEN ACCESS

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons

Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/

licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and

reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to

the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative

Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

REFERENCES

Biton M, Levin A, Slyper M, Alkalay I, Horwitz E, Mor H, Kredo-

Russo S, Avnit-Sagi T, Cojocaru G, Zreik F et al (2011) Epithelial

microRNAs regulate gut mucosal immunity via epithelium-T cell

crosstalk. Nat Immunol 12:239–246Blaya D, Coll M, Rodrigo-Torres D, Vila-Casadesus M, Altamirano J,

Llopis M, Graupera I, Perea L, Aguilar-Bravo B, Diaz A et al

(2016) Integrative microRNA profiling in alcoholic hepatitis

reveals a role for microRNA-182 in liver injury and inflammation.

Gut 65:1535–1545Chen X, Li Q, Wang J, Guo X, Jiang X, Ren Z, Weng C, Sun G,

Wang X, Liu Y et al (2009) Identification and characterization of

novel amphioxus microRNAs by Solexa sequencing. Genome

Biol 10:R78

Holland ND, Chen J (2001) Origin and early evolution of the

vertebrates: new insights from advances in molecular biology,

anatomy, and palaeontology. Bioessays 23:142–151Huang S, Wang X, Yan Q, Guo L, Yuan S, Huang G, Huang H, Li J,

Dong M, Chen S et al (2011) The evolution and regulation of the

mucosal immune complexity in the basal chordate amphioxus.

J Immunol 186:2042–2055Lai L, Song Y, Liu Y, Chen Q, Han Q, Chen W, Pan T, Zhang Y,

Cao X, Wang Q (2013) MicroRNA-92a negatively regulates

Toll-like receptor (TLR)-triggered inflammatory response in

macrophages by targeting MKK4 kinase. J Biol Chem

288:7956–7967Lu Y, Thomson JM, Wong HY, Hammond SM, Hogan BL (2007)

Transgenic over-expression of the microRNA miR-17-92 cluster

promotes proliferation and inhibits differentiation of lung epithelial

progenitor cells. Dev Biol 310:442–453Schmitz A, Gemmel M, Perry SF (2000) Morphometric partitioning of

respiratory surfaces in amphioxus (Branchiostoma lanceolatum

P.). J Exp Biol 203:3381–3390Song S, Ajani JA (2013) The role of microRNAs in cancers of the

upper gastrointestinal tract. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol

10:109–118Wang Y, Zhang S (2011) Identification and expression of liver-

specific genes after LPS challenge in amphioxus: the hepatic

cecum as liver-like organ and “pre-hepatic” acute phase

response. Funct Integr Genom 11:111–118Wang S, Zan J, Wu M, Zhao W, Li Z, Pan Y, Sun Z, Zhu J (2015)

miR-29a promotes scavenger receptor A expression by targeting

QKI (quaking) during monocyte-macrophage differentiation.

Biochem Biophys Res Commun 464:1–6Yang R, Zheng T, Cai X, Yu Y, Yu C, Guo L, Huang S, Zhu W, Zhu R,

Yan Q et al (2013) Genome-wide analyses of amphioxus

microRNAs reveal an immune regulation via miR-92d targeting

C3. J Immunol 190:1491–1500Yu JK, Holland LZ (2009) Cephalochordates (amphioxus or

lancelets): a model for understanding the evolution of

chordate characters. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2009:pdb–emo130

Yuan S, Huang S, Zhang W, Wu T, Dong M, Yu Y, Liu T, Wu K,

Liu H, Yang M et al (2009) An amphioxus TLR with dynamic

embryonic expression pattern responses to pathogens and

activates NF-kappaB pathway via MyD88. Mol Immunol

46:2348–2356Yuan S, Ruan J, Huang S, Chen S, Xu A (2015) Amphioxus as a

model for investigating evolution of the vertebrate immune

system. Dev Comp Immunol 48:297–305

Xin Liao and Liu Yang have contributed equally to this work

Electronic supplementary material The online version of thisarticle (doi:10.1007/s13238-016-0365-3) contains supplementary

material, which is available to authorized users.

Characterization of microRNA expression in amphioxus organs LETTER

© The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn 307

Protein

&Cell