Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program
description
Transcript of Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program
![Page 1: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program
23 August 2012
![Page 2: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Follow-up to Previous ReviewsCitalopram High Dose DUR
2
![Page 3: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Citalopram High Dose DURFDA Drug Safety Communication: Abnormal
heart rhythms associated with high doses of Celexa (citalopram hydrobromide)On August 24, 2011, the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) released a Safety Announcement addressing the high dose of citalopram and potential adverse effects it can have on the heart. The maximum daily dose is now recommended to be 40 mg per day when it was previously 60 mg per day.
3
![Page 4: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Citalopram High Dose DUROn March 28, 2012 the FDA sent out a revised
Drug Safety Communication with updated recommendations: Recognition that although citalopram use should be avoided, if
possible, in patients with certain conditions because of the risk of QT prolongation, ECG monitoring and/or electrolyte monitoring is recommended if citalopram must be used in such patients.
Patients with congenital long QT syndrome are at particular risk of Torsade de Pointes, ventricular tachycardia, and sudden death when given drugs that prolong the QT interval. Nevertheless, the labeling recommendation for patients with congenital long QT syndrome has been changed from “contraindicated” to “not recommended,” because it is recognized that there may be some patients with this condition who could benefit from a low dose of citalopram and who lack viable alternatives.
The maximum recommended dose of citalopram is 20 mg per day for patients over the age of 60.
Citalopram is recommended to be discontinued in patients who are found to have persistent QTc measurements greater than 500 ms. 4
![Page 5: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Citalopram High Dose DURIt was decided at the last DUR Board
Meeting that we would look at the numbers again once a little time had past after the FDA Safety Announcement.
5
![Page 6: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Citalopram High Dose DUR
Series10
20406080
7751
10
40mg citalopram use in recipients 60 years and older
Distinct recipients with a paid claim 1/1/2012-3/31/2012Same recipients with a paid claim in June 2012Recipients with a new claim in June 2012
6
![Page 7: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Citalopram High Dose DURNext steps ???
7
![Page 8: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Current Interventions/Outcomes StudiesP&T Committee Narcotic Analgesic StudiesAliskiren DURLupron DURCiprofloxacin DURSynagis DUR – Medical Claims DataGrowth Hormone DURPsychotropic Medications in Foster Children
UpdateFive (5) or more psychotropic medications prescribed
concomitantly
8
![Page 9: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Narcotic Patterns of Use in Chronic Non-Malignant Pain
Complete Report
9
![Page 10: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Profile ReviewGenerated profiles for the top 150 recipients
by total narcotic claim count from the recipients who had at least one narcotic claim in each of the 24 months of the period ending December 2011
Time Period: May 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011
Evaluated 144 Cancer Diagnosis found in 6All profiles were hand reviewed by Idaho
Medicaid Pharmacists
10
![Page 11: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Review FocusYears of opioid use Number of different opioids usedDaily morphine equivalentsNumber of different prescribersOther concurrent potentially addictive drugsDiagnosis or indication for chronic opioid useAverage days between refillsHistory of abuse diagnosisCurrently in lock-in program?Additional opioid use outside of Medicaid
![Page 12: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Length of Time for Continuous Opioid Use
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 140
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26Number of Years on Opioids -Through 2011
Number of Years
Number of Participants
Records only back to 1998
Average = 8.2 years
![Page 13: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Number of Different Opioids
13
Includes different drugs or dosage formsMay or may not be concurrent, but over course of therapy
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50Number of Different Opioids
Number of Opioids
Number of Participants
Average = 2.9
![Page 14: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Daily Morphine Equivalents
14
Lowest = 10 mgHighest = 2421 mg
0-99100 - 199200-299300-399400-499500-599600-699700-799800-899900-999
1000-10991100-11991200-12991300-1399
2000 or More
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Daily Morphine Equivalents
Number of participants
Daily Morphine Equivalents (mg)
Average = 256 mg equivalents
![Page 15: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Number of Prescribers for Opioids
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120
510
15
20
25
30
35
4045
50
55
6065
70
Number of Prescribers for Opioids
Number of Prescribers
Number of Partic-ipants
Average number of prescribers per participant is 2
15
![Page 16: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
19%
27%
10%
6%
13%
13%
1%3%
1%
9%
Percent of Other Concurrent Potentially Addictive Drugs
None
Benzodiazepines Only (up to 3)
Muscle relaxants only
Sedative Hypnotics Only
Benzodiazepines plus muscle re-laxants
Benzodiazepines plus sedative hypnotics
Sedative Hypnotics plus muscle re-laxants
Benzodiazepines plus a stimulant
Benzodiazapines plus a stimulant plus a sedative hypnotic
Benzodiazepines plus muscle re-laxants plus sedative hypnotics
![Page 17: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Diagnosis/IndicationsDiagnosis Number of Participants
(incidence)
lumbago: unspecified disorder of back; back pain 114
chronic pain; chronic pain syndrome; other chronic pain 90
intervertebral disc disorder; lumbar disc degeneration; cervical disc degeneration; cervicalgia; sciatica; disc degeneration; spondylosis
84
knee injury; shoulder injury; pain in limb; lower leg pain; neck injury; hip and thigh injury; wrist injury 38
hand joint pain; osteoarthritis; rheumatoid arthritis; pain in joint of ankle and foot; ankylosing spondylitis; other disorders of synovium tendon and bursa
42
headache; migraine 14
disorders of muscle ligament and fascia; other disease of bone and cartilage; myalgia 6
abdominal pain, generalized pain 7
multiple sclerosis 4
peripheral neuropathy; diabetic peripheral neuropathy 4
Unknown 2
Most patients had multiples diagnoses
17
![Page 18: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Average Days Prior to Refill
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536370
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Average Days
Number of Partic-ipants
Average = 27 days
18
![Page 19: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Other Information GatheredNumber on Medicaid Pharmacy Lock-In
4 currently on lock-in1 previously on lock-in, released 1/2011
Non-Medicaid Opioid FillsFrom Board of Pharmacy Reports 43 of the 144 patients ( 30%) had fills not paid
for by MedicaidExtra number of doses ranged from 2 to 4275
Concurrent Drug Abuse Diagnosis 56 (39%)
19
![Page 20: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Comparison of Intermittent and Complete Review
Intermittent (90 pts)
Total (150 pts)
Number with Cancer DX
3 6
Average # of Years on Opioids
9.8 (Range 3-14) 8.2 (Range 3-14)
Average # of Different Opioids
2.6 (Range 1-9) 2.9 ( Range 1-10)
Average Daily Morphine Equivalents
202 (Range 10 mg-1080 mg)
256 (Range 10 mg -2421mg)
Average # of Prescribers/Participant
2 (Range 1-12) 2 ( Range 1-12)
Average Days Prior to Refill
30 27
Lock-in Patients 3 4Patients with Prescriptions Paid Outside of Medicaid
34% 30% 20
![Page 21: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Narcotic AnalgesicsDUR Board Recommendations April 2012
Complete Review for the rest of top 150 patients
Research other state restrictions and initiativesP&T Recommendations May 2012
Long- Acting Narcotic Analgesics Tighten up definition of “failure of a preferred
agent” beyond just a prior fill of preferred agent Removal of history of preferred oral agent for
fentanyl transdermal
21
![Page 22: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Review of External Programs and Recommendations
22
![Page 23: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
PROP – Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribingwww.responsibleopioidprescribing.orgMission Statement
Our mission is to reduce morbidity and mortality resulting from prescribing of opioids and to promote cautious, safe and responsible opioid prescribing practices.
Disclosure StatementPROP does not accept financial support from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, urine toxicology laboratories or any other entities that could be perceived as a potential conflict of interest.
Cautious Evidence Based Opioid Prescribing Four page handout included in your packet.
Video: Effectiveness for Chronic Pain: http://www.supportprop.org/educational/index.html
23
![Page 24: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
FDA Recommendations July 9, 2012 FDA introduced new safety measures for
extended release and long acting opioid medications as part of a federal initiative to address the prescription drug abuse, misuse, and overdose epidemic.
Key components to REMS (risk evaluation and mitigation strategies):Training for prescribersUpdated Medication Guide and patient counseling
documentAssessment/Auditing
24
![Page 25: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Training for PrescribersTraining for prescribers is OPTIONAL at this time. The Obama Administration is pursuing legislative changes
to link mandatory training on responsible opioid prescribing to DEA registration.
Companies will be required to make education programs available to prescribers based on an FDA blueprint at no or a nominal cost.
Companies will be required to perform periodic assessments of the implementation of the REMS and the success of the program in meeting its goals.
FDA will review these assessments and may require additional elements to achieve the goals of the program.
25
![Page 26: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Updated Medication GuideConsumer friendly information on the safe
use, storage, and disposal of long acting opioids
Signs of potential overdoseSpecific advice on safe storage to prevent
accidental exposure to family members and household visitors.
26
![Page 27: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Assessment/AuditingCompanies will be expected to achieve certain
FDA-established goals for the percentage of prescribers of ER/LA opioids who complete the training (25% at the end of the first year, 50% after two years, 60% after four years).
Assess prescriber’s understanding of important risk information.
Assess whether the REMS is adversely affecting patient access to necessary pain medications.
27
![Page 28: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
PROP Response to FDALetter sent by PROP to the Food and Drug Administration on July 25, 2012Recommendations
Strike the term “moderate” from the indication for non-cancer pain.
Add a maximum daily dose, equivalent to 100mg of morphine, for non-cancer pain.
Add a maximum duration of 90 days for continuous (daily) use for non-cancer pain.
28
![Page 29: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
PROP Future ActivitiesNational Summit on Opioid Safety
October 31 – November 1, 2012Seattle, WAKeynote Speakers
Roger Chou MD, MPH Oregon Health & Science University
Jane Ballantyne, MD, MPH University of Washington
29
![Page 30: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Current ActivitiesRevision of long-acting opioid criteria
Manual Review (automatic POS denial) for all new patients with prescriptions for the following Oxycodone ER Fentanyl transdermal Butrans
Review of Other State ProgramsAlaska therapeutic duplication editWashington second opinion by pain specialistMontana case managementOregon back pain management program
30
![Page 31: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Possible InterventionEducation on patients receiving > 500
morphine equivalents per dayFrom review n = 17Content ?
31
![Page 32: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Aliskiren DURThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
came out with a safety announcement on April 20, 2012 warning of the possible risks when using aliskiren containing products with ACEIs or ARBs in patients with diabetes or kidney impairment. (see packet for safety announcement)
A report was run to identify patients who had received an aliskiren containing product within the past 90 days.
32
![Page 33: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Aliskiren DURLetters were sent to 17 prescribers about 13
patients on 4/30/2012.As of 8/10/2012, 4 responses have been
received (24% response rate.)See packet for a copy of the letters.
33
![Page 34: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Aliskiren DUR response detail as of 8/10/2012Note that providers may choose more than one
selection per response.
Reviewed and have or will modify the treatment1
I will use this information in the care of future pts1
My patient, but I did not prescribe this2
Not useful to my practice1
Info regarding this pt appears to be correct1 34
![Page 35: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Aliskiren DUR response detail as of 8/10/2012 “I am recipient’s PCP. Dr Rahim from Idaho Kidney Institute
manages her BP medications because of her nephrotic syndrome. There are frequent changes made and he was the one who started her on aliskiren. He did decrease her lisinopril to 20mg. She is being monitored closely with frequent lab and f/u with the specialist. Thank you for the information.”
“She is no longer on aliskiren.” “no longer on this combo. Also original rx was by the patient’s
nephrologist Dr Davidson.” “before sending information please do appropriate research. Pt
has stage 5 CKD and is no longer approved for ACE or ARB therapy.” Please refer to packet for recipient’s profile
35
![Page 36: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Aliskiren DURUtilization Data
Letters were sent to the prescriber of the Tekturna HCT and two of the Tekturna July 2012 claims and one of the claims for Tekturna elicited the first response on the previous slide.
5 other recipients have started Tekturna since January 2012
36
Product January 2012 Claims
July 2012 Claims
Tekturna 12 7Tekturna HCT
1 1
Valturna 2 0
![Page 37: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Aliskiren DUR
Comments/Suggestions ???
37
![Page 38: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Lupron DURReason for DUR Project – Received prior authorization
request for Lupron for a 14 year old genetically male patient who is in the process of becoming a girl. Currently lives in another state – “he” and his mother are planning on moving to Idaho so this prior authorization request was submitted as “he” is now eligible for Idaho Medicaid.
Nothing specific in Idaho Medicaid’s rules about paying or not paying for transgender procedures. Would fall under “medical necessity” review. Chart note was submitted with prior authorization request – nothing written in endocrinologist’s chart note about chromosomal mosaicism or genetic abnormality. Request was denied as not medically necessary.
38
![Page 39: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Lupron DURPreviously Lupron claims would pay at pharmacy
with prior authorization not needed. Have since instituted prior authorization requirements.
FDA approved indications Precocious Puberty
Girls less than 8 years old; boys less than 9 years old Monthly dose 7.5mg – 15mg; Can switch to every 3 month
depot formulation Uterine leiomyomata associated with anemia, in
conjunction with iron supplementation 3.75mg monthly x 3 months or 11.25mg depot single
injection
39
![Page 40: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Lupron DURFDA approved indications continued
Endometriosis 3.75mg monthly x 3 months or 11.25mg depot single
injection Premenstrual syndrome
3.75mg monthly x 3 months Prostate cancer, advanced (palliative treatment)
7.5mg monthly (indefinitely) or 22.5mg depot every 3 months or 30mg depot every 4 months or 45mg depot every 6 months
In vitro fertilization Not a diagnosis covered by Idaho Medicaid (do not cover
fertility treatment)
40
![Page 41: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Lupron DURProfiles reviewed for patients with paid Lupron
claims between 9/01/2011 and 3/31/2012 (n=25)
41
15
10
Patients
Children with sexual precocity (ICD-9 259.1)Women with endometrio-sis
![Page 42: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Lupron DUR15 children with precocious puberty – age as of 3/31/2012
Minimum age: 3 years, 4 monthsMaximum age: 14 years, 8 monthsMean age: 9 years, 4 months
10 women with endometriosis – age as of 3/31/2012Minimum age: 17 yearsMaximum age: 35 yearsMean age: 23 years
Entered prior authorization approvals for all current patients who are still receiving Lupron therapy (grandfathering).
42
![Page 43: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Lupron DURCost of Lupron therapy (all strengths) from 4/1/2011
– 3/31/2012 through outpatient prescription drug program: $289,971.77 (49 patients total)
Cost of Lupron therapy (all strengths) from 4/1/2011 – 3/31/2012 through J-code billing on medical side: $12,179.79 (24 patients total)
Cost of Lupron therapy for requested patient (7.5mg monthly): ~$880 per month - $10,560 per year
43
![Page 44: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Lupron DURWill be instituting auto-PA rule so that claims for
children with precocious puberty and women with endometriosis would still pay at Point of Sale with no prior authorization paperwork required IF the applicable diagnosis is in the patient’s electronic profile at the time that the pharmacy claim is run.
44
![Page 45: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Lupron DURApprove within age and dosage limits for the following FDA
approved diagnoses: ICD-9 259.1 Sexual precocity ICD-9 617.x Endometriosis ICD-9 174.x Malignant neoplasm of female breast ICD-9 175.x Malignant neoplasm of male breast ICD-9 183.x Malignant neoplasm of ovary ICD-9 185.x Malignant neoplasm of prostate ICD-9 218.x Uterine leiomyoma
Parameters in Rx POS System Age set at 0-999 Quantity set at 0.04 (1 syringe/30 days = 0.033) Both (male and female)
45
![Page 46: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Lupron DURReferences
Abbott Laboratories. Lupron Depot-PED prescribing information.
Cigna Medical Coverage Policy – Effective date 1/15/2011.
Texas Medicaid Policy.
46
![Page 47: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURRationale for study: Idaho Medicaid was
requested to look at why ciprofloxacin was prescribed for pediatric patients less than 16 years old. Currently ciprofloxacin will pay at the pharmacy with no age limitations while levofloxacin currently requires an age override prior authorization for pediatric patients less than 16 years old.
47
![Page 48: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURCiprofloxacin Package Insert:
FDA approved for pediatric patients 1-17 years of age with complicated urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis due to E coli and for pediatric patients (age not specified) with inhalational anthrax.
Levaquin Package Insert:FDA approved for pediatric patients (6 months
of age and older) only for the prevention of inhalational anthrax (post-exposure) and for plague.
48
![Page 49: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURRetrospective DUR was done on patients less
than 16 years of age with at least one paid claim between 2-1-12 and 4-30-12.N=77, mean age 10.3, std deviation 4.0 years.
49
![Page 50: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DUROral Antibiotic Utilization 2-1-2012 through 4-30-2012 < 16
years of ageProduct Distinct
Recipients
Total Claims
Total Reimbursement to
Pharmacy
Average cost per claim
Levofloxacin 8 9 $827.62 $91.96Ciprofloxacin*
79 86 $2,772.86 $32.24
Amoxicillin 14,159 15,380 $194,848.07 $12.67Augmentin 3,326 3,620 $119,378.31 $32.98Azithromycin
6,620 7,157 $140,062.90 $19.57
Bactrim 1,883 2,240 $26,755.37 $11.94* Report ran after original run to identify 77 recipients so 2 new recipients showed up on this report
50
![Page 51: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURSummary
Diagnosis Total # of recipientsUTI or cystitis or pyelonephritis with at least one antibiotic tried before ciprofloxacin
18
UTI or cystitis or pyelonephritis with no other antibiotic tried before ciprofloxacin
7
CF Patients 4
Oncology Patients 2
Asthma/Respiratory Distress 11
Pneumonia/URI/bronchitis 6
Other 16
No Diagnosis Listed 1351
![Page 52: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURUTI or cystitis or pyelonephritis with at least one antibiotic tried before ciprofloxacinn=18, mean age (standard deviation) 10.5 yrs (3.8), min=3, max=1513/18 filled ciprofloxacin once; three (2 fills), one (3 fills), one (4 fills)
Series10
1
2
3
4
5
6
amox
azit
h Augm
enti
n
Bac
trim
ceph
alex
in
cefd
inir
nitr
ofu-
rant
oin
amox
+Au
gm
enti
n
52
![Page 53: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DUR
Emergency Medicine
NP Family Practice
PA Midwife (pt. is 14 years old)
Urology Peds Unknown0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2
4
5
2
1 1
2
1
Prescriber taxonomy for patients treated for UTI/cystitis/pyelonephritis with previous antibi-
otic usage
53
![Page 54: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURUTI or cystitis or pyelonephritis with no other antibiotic tried before ciprofloxacinn=7, mean age (standard deviation) 11.7 yrs (3.7), min=6, max=15All had only single fill of ciprofloxacin
Series10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
87
# o
f rec
ipie
nts
54
![Page 55: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DUR
Emergency Medicine
General Practice NP Family Practice Peds0
1
2
3
2
1
2
1 1
Prescriber taxonomy for patients treated for UTI/cystitis/pyelonephritis without previous an-
tibiotic usage
55
![Page 56: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURCF Patientsn=4, mean age (standard deviation) 9 yrs (4.6), min=4, max=14
prior antibioticsCiprofloxacin
fills
02468
101214
Patient 1
Patient 2
Patient 3
Patient 4
21
7
5
8
3
12 13
56
![Page 57: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DUROncology Patients
Both were 6 years oldKidney cancer with cellulitis of legBone cancer with infection of amputation
stumpBoth had single fills of ciprofloxacin
57
![Page 58: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURAsthma/Respiratory Distressn=11, mean age (standard deviation) 9.6 yrs (5.0), min=1, max=154 had no prior antibiotics, 7 had prior antibiotics ranging from 1-155 patients had 1 fill only of ciprofloxacin, 3 fills (2 patients), 8 fills (1 patient), 11 fills (1 patient), 12 fills (1 patient)
no prior antibiotics prior antibiotics0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
4
7
# o
f rec
ipie
nts
58
![Page 59: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURPneumonia/URI/bronchitisn=6, mean age (standard deviation) 8.8 yrs (5.1), min=2, max=14All had single fills of ciprofloxacin
no prior antibiotics Augmentin/azithromycin previously
0
1
2
3
4
5
65
1# o
f rec
ipie
nts
59
![Page 60: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DUROthern=16, mean age (standard deviation) 9.9 yrs (4.0), min=3, max=159 had prior antibiotics (Bactrim x 3, amox x 2, Augmentin x 1, cephalexin x 1, minocycline x 1, Bactrim/Augmentin x 1)13 had one fill of ciprofloxacin only; two had two fills and one had 5 fills (s/p liver transplant)
Series10
1
2
3
4ot
itis
med
ia phar
yngi
tis
abdo
min
al
pain
cellu
litis
/ski
n in
fect
ion
1 ea
ch -
foot
w
ound
infe
c-tio
n, s
/p li
ver
tran
spla
nt,
s/p
kidn
ey
tran
spla
nt,
peri
tone
al
absc
ess,
ski
n in
fect
ion,
ap
pend
iciti
s
# o
f rec
ipie
nts
60
![Page 61: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURNo Diagnosis Listedn=13, mean age (standard deviation) 11.8 yrs (2.6), min=7, max=1511 had one fill of ciprofloxacin; one had two fills and one had 3 fills
no prior an-tibiotics
amoxicillin Augmentin Augmentin/azithromycin
0
2
4
6
8
10
1210
1 1 1# o
f rec
ipie
nts
61
![Page 62: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURAmerican Academy of Pediatrics: The Use of
Systemic and Topical Fluoroquinolones. John S. Bradley, Mary Anne Jackson and the Committee on Infectious Diseases. Pediatrics 2011;128;e1034-e1045.Quotes from the article: Use of fluoroquinolones in children should continue to be
limited to treatment of infections for which no safe and effective alternative exists.
Animal toxicology data available with the first quinolones compounds documented their propensity to create inflammation and subsequent destruction of weight-bearing joints in juvenile animals.
No published reports exist of physician-diagnosed cartilage damage in children in the United States, either from controlled clinical trials of fluoroquinolones or from unsolicited reporting to the FDA or drug manufacturers.
No reports of tendon rupture in pediatric patients exposed to any quinolone.
62
![Page 63: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURStudy 1 – Prospective safety study performed at
the request of the FDA by Bayer for ciprofloxacin.Studied rate of arthropathy 6 weeks after treatment with
ciprofloxacin (n=335) or comparator antibiotic (n=349) in eight countries including the US.
A difference was only detected in the US with a rate of arthropathy 21.0% (n=62) with ciprofloxacin vs. 11.3% (n=71) with comparator antibiotic.
Mexico had a zero incidence of arthropathy in both ciprofloxacin and comparator antibiotic.
The study used a non inferiority design to assess musculoskeletal complaints across all countries, and as analyzed, the groups were sufficiently different to suggest potential musculoskeletal toxicity with ciprofloxacin (9.3%) vs. comparator (6.0%).
63
![Page 64: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURStudy 2 - Prospective and randomized but not
blinded study performed by Johnson & Johnson for levofloxacin as part of their FDA-coordinated program of pediatric drug development.N=2523 from 3 large multicenter efficacy trials
including a community-acquired pneumonia trial in children aged 6 months to 16 years and acute otitis media in children 6 months to 5 years.
An analysis of weight-bearing joint disorders had a statistically greater rate between the levofloxacin and comparator treated groups at 2 months (1.9% vs. 0.7%, p=0.025) and at 12 months (2.9% vs. 1.6%, p=0.047).
A history of joint pain accounted for 85% of all events, but there were no findings of joint abnormality when assessed by physical examination (all patients) or CT scan/MRI (selected patients). 64
![Page 65: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURWorld Health Organization: What is the
evidence of safety of quinolones use in children? International Child Health Review Collaboration. September 2, 2008. Summary Statement:Fluoroquinolones are efficacious antimicrobial agents
with an important role in the treatment of a variety of pediatric infections. Ciprofloxacin is a particularly useful fluoroquinolone for dysentery and typhoid.
There is grade A evidence to support both the overall safety of ciprofloxacin use in children and lack of joint toxicity.
65
![Page 66: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Ciprofloxacin DURRecommendations for prior authorization for
age override for pediatric patients receiving ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin?Add age criteria to cipro and/or remove age
criteria from levofloxacin?
66
![Page 67: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Synagis DUR
Medical claims for 2011-2012 season: $274,881.27
Pharmacy claims for 2011-2012 season: $1,362,626.70
67
![Page 68: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Synagis DUR – Medical Claims Data from 10-1-2011 through 6-20-2012 (RSV 2011-2012 Season)40 patients identified – ALL had prior
authorization approvals.PA Request Marked as:
Billing using CPT Code: 11Pharmacy billing for drug: 7Nothing specific marked on form: 22
Future Question: Should we inform Idaho medical unit of all prior authorizations for Synagis as the doctors’ offices are not doing a good job of informing Medicaid if claim will be paid as a medical claim or as a pharmacy claim? 68
![Page 69: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Synagis DUR – Medical Claims Data from 10-1-2011 through 6-20-2012 (RSV 2011-2012 Season)Four patients identified with claims that
should NOT have paid:Patient 1
SEVEN doses paid for: 3 as medical claims and 4 as pharmacy claims. Also kept switching between 50mg and 100mg vial sizes. 12/5/11 – 50mg (pharmacy claim) 1/9/12 – 100mg (pharmacy claim) 1/13/12 – 50mg (medical claim) 2/6/12 – 100mg (pharmacy claim) 2/16/12 – 50mg (medical claim) 3/5/12 – 100mg (pharmacy claim) 4/26/12 – 50mg (medical claim)
69
![Page 70: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Synagis DUR – Medical Claims Data from 10-1-2011 through 6-20-2012 (RSV 2011-2012 Season)
Patient 2 A total of 5 doses paid but two paid in same month
(one as pharmacy claim and one as medical claim) plus four claims paid as 100mg but third paid as 50mg. 12/12/11 – 100mg (pharmacy claim) 1/9/12 – 100mg (pharmacy claim) 1/20/12 – 50mg (medical claim) 2/6/12 – 100mg (pharmacy claim) 3/5/12 – 100mg (pharmacy claim)
70
![Page 71: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Synagis DUR – Medical Claims Data from 10-1-2011 through 6-20-2012 (RSV 2011-2012 Season)
Patient 3 PA was approved through 4/30/12 but second dose
paid on 6/1/12 and second dose paid for 50mg when first dose was for 100mg. 4/5/12 – 100mg (medical claim) 6/1/12 – 50mg (medical claim)
Patient 4 Only approved for four doses as one dose was
already given in hospital. Five doses were paid for as pharmacy claims and an additional claim was submitted on the medical side that was not paid.
71
![Page 72: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Synagis DUR – Medical Claims Data from 10-1-2011 through 6-20-2012 (RSV 2011-2012 Season)Other Dosing Issues per each individual
patientClaims paid on pharmacy side not medical side
First dose paid for 150mg but second through fifth doses paid for 100mg
Claims paid on medical side Doses 1, 2, 3, 5 – 150mg but Dose 4 - 200mg
Claims paid on medical side Doses 1, 3, 4, 5 – 150mg but Dose 2 - 100mg
Claims paid on pharmacy side Dose 1 – 150mg but Dose 2 100mg
Claims paid on medical side Doses 1, 2, 4, 5 – 150mg but Dose 3 100mg 72
![Page 73: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Synagis DUR – Medical Claims Data from 10-1-2011 through 6-20-2012 (RSV 2011-2012 Season)
Comments/suggestions ???
73
![Page 74: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Synagis - July 2012 AAP Red Book Updates for Synagis ProphylaxisGestational Age 32 weeks, 0 days through 34
weeks, 6 days AND chronological age less than 90 daysSynagis prophylaxis (maximum of 3 monthly
doses) may be considered for infants who have at least 1 of 2 risk factors:1. Infant attends child care, defined as home or
facility where care is provided for any number of infants or young toddlers.
2. One or more older siblings younger than 5 years of age or other children younger than 5 years of age lives permanently in the same household. Multiple births younger than 1 year of age do not qualify as fulfilling this risk factor.
74
![Page 75: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Synagis - July 2012 AAP Red Book Updates for Synagis ProphylaxisInfants with congenital abnormalities of the
airway or neuromuscular diseaseImmunoprophylaxis may be considered for
infants who have either congenital abnormalities of the airway or a neuromuscular condition that compromises handling of respiratory secretions. Infants and young children in this category should receive a maximum of 5 doses of palivizumab during the first year of life.
75
![Page 76: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Growth Hormone DURIdaho Medicaid’s Pharmacy & Therapeutics
(P&T) Committee requested that the DUR Board look at the utilization numbers of the Growth Hormone class.
The potential exists to save the State money should patients be switched from a non-preferred to a preferred agent. Previously patients have been grandfathered to allow them to remain on their current therapy.
76
![Page 77: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Growth Hormone DURDrug Utilization HIC3 = P1A (Growth Hormones) 1/1/2012 –
6/24/2012Product Unique Recipients Total claimsGenotropin 16 65Humatrope 4 15Norditropin Flexpro* 29 112Norditropin Nordiflex*
1 2
Nutropin* 2 5Nutropin AQ* 2 10Nutropin AQ Nuspin* 10 41Saizen 1 4Serostim 1 2Summary of All 66 256* Currently preferred agents
77
![Page 78: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Growth Hormone DUR
Comments/Suggestions ???
78
![Page 79: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Foster ChildrenPreliminary Idaho Medicaid Data
8/2012
79
![Page 80: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
80
Use of Psychotropic Medications in Foster Children
Percentage of children (0-17 years old) prescribed psychotropic Medications in named State and year
Foster Children Nonfoster children Ratio of foster to nonfoster children
Florida 2008 22.0% 8.2% 2.7
Massachusetts 2008 39.1% 10.2% 3.8
Michigan 2008 21.0% 7.9% 2.7
Oregon 2008 19.7% 4.8% 4.1
Texas 2008 32.2% 7.1% 4.5
Idaho 2008 38.8% 14.8% 2.6
Idaho 2011 42.9% 14.8% 2.9
Comparison of Idaho Medicaid to Five States in GAO Study
![Page 81: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
81
Foster Children and Non-Foster Children Population Basis
Year Total # of Foster childrenTotal # of Non-Foster
children
2007 2,384 85,894
2008 2,516 86,419
2009 2,658 96,979
2010 2,718 103,199
2011 2,785 106,024
![Page 82: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
82
Percentage of Children Receiving Psychotropic Medications Over Time
2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Perc
enta
ge o
f Chi
ldre
n
![Page 83: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Focus on Calendar Year 2011
83
![Page 84: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
ADHD Drugs Anti-depressants Mood Stabilizers Atypical Antipsychotics0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
36%
23%
13%
21%
9%
6%
0%
4%
Percent of Foster and Non-Foster Children Psychotropics by Drug Class
Calendar Year 2011
% Foster Children% Non-foster Children
Total foster =2785Total Non-Foster = 106,024
84
![Page 85: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
ADHD Drugs in Foster Children
0-6 F 0-6 M 7-12 F 7-12 M 13-17 F 13-17 M0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
Foster Children Receiving ADHD DrugsPercent by Age and Gender
Foster Non-Foster
85
![Page 86: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
Antidepressants in Foster Children
0-6 F 0-6 M 7-12 F 7-12 M 13-17 F 13-17 M0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
Foster Children Receiving Antidepressants Percent by Age and Gender
Foster Non-Foster
86
![Page 87: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
Atypical Antipsychotics in Foster Children
0-6 F 0-6 M 7-12 F 7-12 M 13-17 F 13-17 M0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
Foster Children Receiving Atypical An-tipsychotics
Percent by Age and Gender
Foster Non-Foster
87
![Page 88: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
Who is Prescribing These Drugs?
Child/Adolescent Psychi-atrist18%
Psychiatrist19%
Behavioral/Develop-mental Pediatrician
7%
Neurologist2%
Pediatrician15%
Family Medicine/Gen-eral Practice
17%
Internal Medicine1%
Nurse Practitioner15%
Physican Assistant6%
Other0%
Prescriber Type by Claims Volume Statewide
88
![Page 89: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
Regional Prescriber Variation
Specialist Generalist - MD Midlevel 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Prescriber Type by Region By Percentage of Psychotropic Prescriptions
for Foster Children
Region 1Region 2Region 3Region 4Region 5Region 6Region 7
89
![Page 90: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
90
Age Distribution
0-6 7-12 13-170%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Percent of Prescription Volume by Age
![Page 91: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
Foster Children Psychotropic Drugs Red Flags
8/21/2012
91
![Page 92: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Red FlagsFive (5) or more psychotropic medications
prescribed concomitantlyTwo (2) or more concomitant antidepressantsTwo (2) or more concomitant antipsychotic
medicationsTwo(2) or more concomitant stimulant
medications long-acting plus short-acting ok
Three (3) or more concomitant mood stabilizer medications
Psychotropic polypharmacy (2 or more agents) for a given mental disorder prescribed before utilizing psychotropic monotherapy
92
![Page 93: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
93
Implementation of Red Flags
Retroacti
ve Evaluatio
n
Identify outliers
Profile
Review
DUR Board Intervention• Targ
eted education
Re-evaluation• indi
viduals
• overall
Further
Action
Point of service edits• Informa
tional (soft) – pharmacist override
• Hard Stop
![Page 94: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
Foster Children with Five or More Psychotropic Medications
August 2012
94
![Page 95: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
Study ParametersFoster Children with 5 or more distinct
behavioral health drugsService Dates between 11/1/2011 and
4/30/2012 (6 months)N = 5
95
![Page 96: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
Mental Health Drug List: Stimulants
Stimulantsamphetamine mixed salts generic, Adderall, Adderall XRdextroamphetamine generic, Dexedrine, Dexedrine
Spansulelisdexamfetamine Vyvansemethylphenidate generic, Ritalin, Metadate ER,
Metadate CD, Methylin, Methylin ER, Concerta, Daytrana TD
dexmethlyphenidate generic, Focalin, Focalin XR
96
![Page 97: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
Mental Health Drug List: Other ADHD Treatments
Other ADHD Treatmentsatomoxetine Stratteraclonidine generic, Catapresguanfacine generic, Tenex, Intunivbupropion generic, Wellbutrin, Wellbutrin
SR, Wellbutrin XRimipramine generic, Tofranil, Tofranil-PMnortriptyline generic, Aventyl, Pamelor
97
![Page 98: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
Mental Health Drug List: AntidepressantsSSRIcitalopram generic, Celexaescitalopram generic, Lexaprofluoxetine generic, Prozacparoxetine generic, Paxil, Paxil CRfluvoxamine generic, Luvox, Luvox CRsertraline generic, ZoloftSNRIvelafaxine generic, Effexor, Effexor XRduloxetine Cymbaltadesevenlafaxine Pritiq
98
![Page 99: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
Mental Health Drug List: Mood Stabilizers
Mood Stabilizerscarbamazepine generic, Carbatol, Tegretol,
Tegretol XRdivalproex generic, Depakotelithium generic, Eskalith, Eskalith CR,
Lithobidlamotrigine generic, Lamictal
99
![Page 100: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
Mental Health Drug List: Second Generation (atypical) AntipsychoticsSecond Generation Antipsychoticsaripiprizole Abilifyasenapine Saphrisclozapine generic, Clozarililoperidone Fanaptlurasidone Latudaolanzapine generic, Zyprexapaliperidone Invegaquetiapine generic, Seroquel, Seroquel XRrisperidone generic, Risperdalziprasidone generic, Geodon
100
![Page 101: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
Mental Health Drug List: First Generation (Typical) AntipsychoticsFirst Generation Antipsychoticschlorpromazine generic, Thorazinehaloperidol generic, Haldolperphenazine generic, Trilafonpimozide Orap
101
![Page 102: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
Patient 10115 year old femaleMental Health Diagnoses
Pervasive Developmental DisorderEncephalopathy, otherOppositional Defiant DisorderAttention Deficit with HyperactivityPosttraumatic Stress Disorder
Drug DurationVyvanse 70 mg #30 2 years 5 monthsAmphetamine Salt Combo 10 mg #60 3 years 3 monthsClonidine 0.1 mg #30 10 monthsFluoxetine 10 mg #30 6 monthsGeodon 80 mg #60 1 year 3 monthsGeodon 60 mg #30 1 year 7 months
102
![Page 103: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Patient 10516 year old femaleMental Health Diagnoses
Reactive Attachment DisorderPosttraumatic Stress DisorderBipolar Disorder, Unspecified
Drug DurationAmphetamine Salt Combo 20 mg #62
2 years
Sertraline 100 mg #30 1 year 5 monthsOxcarbazepine 600 mg #60 4 yearsLithium 300 mg #120 4 yearsRisperidone 0.5 mg #60 1 year 11 monthsQuetiapine 400 mg #30 6 years
103
![Page 104: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Patient 1138 year old femaleMental Health Diagnoses
Bipolar I Disorder, UnspecifiedBipolar I Disorder, Mixed SevereAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityReactive Attachment DisorderUnspecified Delay in Development
104
![Page 105: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
Patient 113Drug DurationAdderall XR 20 mg #30 3 years 8 monthsAmphetamine Salt Combo 10 mg #30 1 year 7 monthsVyvanse 70 mg #30 1 year 8 monthsClonidine 0.1 mg #120 1 year 11 monthsGeodon 40 mg 1 monthAbilify 30 mg #30 1 year 7 monthsQuetiapine 100 mg #60Quetiapine 200 mg #60Quetiapine 300 mg #30Quetiapine 400 mg #30
Quetiapine was started 5/20/2011. Dose during the evaluated 6 month period 700 mg daily.
105
![Page 106: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
Patient 11717 year old femaleMental Health Diagnoses
Moderate Intellectual DisabilityUnspecified Developmental DelayBipolar Disorder, Unspecified
106
![Page 107: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
Patient 117Drug DurationGuanfacine 1 mg #30 2 monthsCitalopram 20 mg #30 1 monthCitalopram 40 mg #30 2 years 4 monthsQuetiapine 200 mg #30 2 years 4 monthsQuetiapine 400 mg #30 2 years 4 monthsRisperidone 1 mg #60 4 years 3 months
107
![Page 108: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
Patient 12011 year old maleMental Health Diagnoses
Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityUnspecified Episodic Mood DisorderUnspecified Emotional Disturbance of
Childhood or Adolescence
108
![Page 109: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
Patient 120Drug DurationConcerta 54 mg #30 3 years 8 monthsStrattera 60 mg # 30 10 monthsClonidine 0.1 mg #90 2 years 7 monthsAbilify 5 mg #30 2 monthsQuetiapine * 50 mg #90 1 monthQuetiapine * 200 mg #60 4 monthsQuetiapine * 300 mg #60 2 years 8 months
Patient has been on varying doses of quetiapine since 9/16/2008
109
![Page 110: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
Proposed Studies for Next Quarter:P&T Committee Narcotic Analgesic Studies –
Next StepsLeukotrienes vs. inhaled corticosteroids in
children with asthmaUse of Psychotropic Medications in Foster
ChildrenTwo (2) or more concomitant antidepressants
Migraine PreventionProphylaxis Utilization in Chronic Triptan UtilizersTopiramate
PA, Medical Claim and Triptan Use MismatchIVIG
110
![Page 111: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
Leukotrienes vs. inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthmaNumber of recipients < 18 years of age with
paid claim for leukotriene:
Number of recipients < 18 years of age with paid claim for inhaled corticosteroid:
Date # of recipients7/1/2011 – 9/30/2011 3,3691/1/2012 – 3/31/2012 3,059
Date # of recipients7/1/2011 – 9/30/2011 1,5951/1/2012 – 3/31/2012 2,156
111
![Page 112: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
Use of Psychotropic Medications in Foster Children The U.S. Government Accountability Office
released the results from a study that they performed examining the rates of psychotropic medications for foster and nonfoster children in 2008.
It was determined that HHS Guidance Could Help States Improve Oversight of Psychotropic Prescriptions.
112
![Page 113: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
Use of Psychotropic Medications in Foster ChildrenMedication Classes included in the report
ADHD drugsAnti-anxietyAnticonvulsantAntidepressantsAnti-enuretic (just desmopressin acetate) Antiparkinson Antipsychotics Combination anti-anxiety and antidepressant Hypnotic Mood stabilizer (just lithium)Sleep aid (just melatonin)
113
![Page 114: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
Use of Psychotropic Medications in Foster Children: Next StepsTwo (2) or more concomitant antidepressants
114
![Page 115: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
Migraine PreventionProphylaxis Utilization in Chronic Triptan
UtilizersSee packet for summary handout
115
![Page 116: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
Migraine PreventionTopiramate use other than Seizure
Disorder/Migraine HeadacheEvaluate the use of topiramate for non-FDA labeled
indications. Off label use for weight loss Off label use as a mood stabilizer for Bipolar symptoms
All patients on topiramate were evaluated from 1/1/2012 thru 6/30/2012. 1,223 patients on topiramate 949 patients with approved criteria (ICD-9 code in Medical
Profile) of Seizure Disorder/Migraine Headache 274 (22.4%) of patients without approved criteria
Review patients to determine topiramate use other than FDA approved indications
116
![Page 117: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
IVIG – Intravenous Immune Globulin
Currently prior authorization is not needed for either an outpatient prescription (as long as cost per claim is less than $7500) or for a claim on the medical side.
117
![Page 118: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
IVIG – Intravenous Immune GlobulinReviewing outpatient prescription claims
between 8/01/2011 and 7/31/2012$279,52779 claims14 patientsAverage cost per prescription: $3538
Claims paid on medical side between 1/01/2011 and 12/31/2011$106,414136 claims37 patientsAverage cost per prescription: $783
118
![Page 119: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
IVIG – Intravenous Immune GlobulinIn the process of sending out letters to gather
medical information:DiagnosisDosing regimenResponse to therapy
Will review information at October 2012 DUR meeting. Future question to answer: Should IVIG require prior authorization?
119
![Page 120: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
Prospective DUR ReportHistory Errors:
• DD – drug-to-drug• PG – drug to pregnancy• TD – therapeutic
duplication• ER – early refill• MC – drug-to-disease
Non-History Errors:• PA – drug-to-age• HD – high dose• LD – low dose• SX – drug-to-gender
120
![Page 121: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
Prospective DUR ReportIdaho Medicaid ProgramProDUR Message Report
July-12
ProDUR ProDUR Message MessageMessage Severity Count Amount
Drug To Drug 1 1,810 $436,467.09 2 14,750 $2,464,369.13 3 67,726 $11,376,540.02
9 4 $58.07Drug To Gender 1 189 $42,290.26 2 68 $3,956.14Drug To Known Disease 1 63,676 $8,404,657.29 2 239,425 $46,436,371.98 3 290,817 $50,899,774,.57Drug To Pregnancy 1 100 $1,065.85 2 11 $542.34 A 4 $109.25 B 83 $19,811.01 C 224 $22,883.60 D 29 $3,143.66 X 14 $259.81Duplicate Therapy 0 114,360 $24,014,747.46Min Max 0 33,293 $5,183,695.34Too Soon Clinical 0 21,690 $3,721,624.57ALL 848,273 $153,032,367.44 Total Number of Claims with Messages 210,213 Average ProDUR Message Per Claim 4.04
121
![Page 122: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
DUR Summer NewsletterCopy of Spring Newsletter in packetBrainstorm for new topics
122
![Page 123: Idaho Medicaid Drug Utilization Review Program](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070500/56816856550346895dde72c7/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
Medicaid Update
123