ICH BIN DER TITEL DIESER PRÄSENTATION UND DARF DREI … · • Obligated parties and...
Transcript of ICH BIN DER TITEL DIESER PRÄSENTATION UND DARF DREI … · • Obligated parties and...
JRC WORKSHOP
Annual energy savings generated through energy efficiency obligation schemes and alternative measures implemented under EED Article 7
Session I: Lessons learned from the measurement, verification and validation of reported savings under Art. 7 and corrective actions possibly taken
15. November 2016 // Gregor Thenius
Brussels
• Legal background and framework conditions
• The Article 7 target
• Measures and achieved savings
• Design of M&V Systems under Article 7
• Calculation of energy savings
• Success factors
Contents
Legal background and framework conditions
Energy efficiency directive (European Union)
Austrian Energy Efficiency Act (Austria)
2014: Austria issues law on energy efficiency in order to comply with EU legislation
Decoupling of gross inland consumption and economic growth in Austria
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
2401970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
Index 1
973 =
100
BIP real Bruttoinlandsverbrauch Relativer Energieverbrauch
Entkopplung - Bruttoinlandsverbrauch/Wirtschaftswachstum
GDP real Gross inland consumption Specific energy consumption
Further decoupling since 2005
80
90
100
110
120
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
indexie
rt 2005=
100
BIV BIP Relativer EV
Entkopplung - Bruttoinlandsverbrauch/Wirtschaftswachstum
Index 2
005 =
100
The Article 7 target
Article 7 target: 271,728 TJ
Deduction of
- Amounts in transport
- Amounts not sold to
final customers
2010 2011 2012 Ø
Final energy consumption TJ 1.137.766 1.103.364 1.096.188 1.112.440
FEC - Transport TJ 366.494 357.424 351.874 358.598
FEC - Coke oven gas TJ 3.129 3.130 2.282 2.847
FEC - Blast furnace gas TJ 1.652 1.547 1.275 1.491
FEC - Spent liquor TJ 20.815 20.475 20.574 20.622
FEC - Ambient heat TJ 11.941 12.827 13.594 12.787
FEC - Own use of fuel wood TJ 21.296 26.231 27.234 24.920
average final energy sold TJ 691.175
Red
uct
ion
s
Final energy sold 691.175 TJ
annual target 10.368 TJ/a
cumulative target (2014-2020) 290.304 TJ
25% early actions 72.576 TJ
target cumulative 217.728 TJ
target annual 7.776 TJ/a
Deduction of 25% early
actions
The Article 7 target over time
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Cumulative
Early ations (max. 25 % of target) 10.368 10.368 10.368 10.368 10.368 10.368 10.368 72.576
3.888 3.888 3.888 3.888 3.888 3.888 3.888 27.216
9.072 9.072 9.072 9.072 9.072 9.072 54.432
9.072 9.072 9.072 9.072 9.072 45.360
9.072 9.072 9.072 9.072 36.288
9.072 9.072 9.072 27.216
9.072 9.072 18.144
9.072 9.072
Total savings 2014-2020 217.728
Interim tragets (excl. early actions) 69.984 147.744
Total savings (early actions and
measures from 2014) 14.256 23.328 32.400 41.472 50.544 59.616 68.688 290.304
annual new savings for Article 7 (2014-
2020)
2014-2017: 2018-2020:
Measures and achieved savings
Annual savings reported for 2014
Policy measure
Energy efficiency obligation scheme 2,585 n.a.
Housing and energy support of Federal Provinces and renovation vouchers
1,940 73,000
Operational domestic environmental support (UFI) 1,469 11,000
Green electricity support scheme 33 10,000
Energy taxes 22,780 74,900
Highway toll for trucks 490 7,000
Renovation initiative (commercial buildings) 304 n.a.
klimaaktiv mobil 26 n.a.
Climate and energy fund 271 n.a.
Further measures (building codes, district heating…) n.a. 48,000
Total 29,898 223,900
TJ annual reported
2014
TJ cumulative expected (NEEAP 2014)
Savings according to categories of individual actions
33%
27%
17%
7%
7%
5%3%
1%1% 0%
Heating and hot water
Building envelope
Others
Industrial installationsand processesElectricity generation (PV& CHP)Lighting
Transport
Soft measures
Cooling and airconditioning
*excl. energy taxes and highway toll for trucks
Design of M&V Systems under Article 7
The Monitoring Agency is focal point for EED reporting
BMWFW(Auftraggeber)
Energy suppliers
Energy consuming Enterprises
Energy service providers
Public authorities
Affected groups
IT service provider (third party)
Federal n Ministry of Science, Research and
Economy
Tasks of the National Monitoring Agency
Developing methods for the calculation of energy savings
Evaluating the status quo of
target achievement
Definition of data flows between all affected parties
Assessing the qualification of energy service providers
Preparation of Energy efficiency action plans
and other reports
Registration of all obligated companies
Controlling of the companies‘
obligation
Observing the Austrian market
for energy services
According to §27 of the Energy Efficiency Act
…regulates
• Criteria for the eligibility of ee-measures
• Criteria for the calculation of energy savings
• Standardised calculation methods for frequently implemented measures
• Guidelines on the calculation of energy savings for individual projects
• Documentation criteria for ee-measures
• Quality criteria for evaluators of energy efficiency measures
Decree on the National Monitoring Agency
What measures?
• Final energy
• In Austria
• Additional
• Lifetime until 2020 (if not only proportional)
Who calculates savings?
• Pre-defined and standardised bottom-up methods
• For other calculations: Qualified experts (mentioned in the decree)
How savings have to be calculated and reported?
• Criteria according to the decree
• Reported via an online database
Methods for the calculation
Steps:
1. Company/authority has to be registered at the Unternehmensserviceportal (USP), which is the single entry point for businesses to the administration
2. Company/authority has to be registered at the National Monitoring Agency
3. Accounts to the database are personalised: it is clear at each moment who entered data for a company
Reporting of measures via online forms
Two-Step registration process for the online database
Reporting of measures Online database
A glance into the online application
• Obligated parties and administrators of alternative measures report individual
measures each year via the online database
• Data reported:
• Type of measure
• Energy savings (either standardised or individual)
• Information on the customer (name, address)
• Date of implementation of the measure
• Data documented
• All other measure specific information
• EEO: Has to be made available to the National Monitoring Agency in case of detailed controls
• Alternative measures: Data documented by the scheme administrator can be used for controls
Formal M&V process
Co
ntr
ol a
nd
on
-sit
e c
he
cks
Control provisions for the EEO
All required data is reported via the online database
No pre-checks: Measures are controlled and verified after being reported by
an obligated party
Three step control procedure 1. Plausibility check
• Over all data entered • Automatic to a large extent • Double counting
2. Data check desktop • Representative sample – requested over all types of measures and
obligated parties • Calculation and documentation is evaluated based on paper files
3. On-site check • 25 days / year
Calculation of energy savings
Generalised methods and individual calculations
Generalized methods Individual calculations
Overview of generalised measures
42 Methods
Heating
Building envelope
Cooling and air conditioning
Lighting
Transport
Soft measures Electric appliances
Stand-by reduction
Solar thermal
Photovoltaics
CHP
For around 250 individual measures
Generalised methods are updated regularly • Proposal by National Monitoring Agency • Discussed with all stakeholders (obligated parties, authorities)
Energy consumption (before realization of the efficiency measure)
minus
Energy consumption (after realization of the efficiency measure)
(normalized | annual savings)
Possible data sources for the energy consumption?
Energy consumption (before / after)
energy bill standards or laws (minimum standards) measurements
Project based surveys product information
normalized, e.g. production units [t]
kilometer traveled [km]
external influences (e.g. heat degree days)
“Measures are eligible only if they result in energy efficiency
effects beyond minimum legal or technical requirements.”
Central question to ask:
What would have happened anyway?
General additionality requirement
Energy efficiency measures must be additional
Measures are eligible if they go beyond legal requirements and are
better than the existing stock or the market average.
New product/technology • Legal minimum requirement in place: sets the baseline. • No legal minimum requirement in place: baseline is set at market average of new
products/technologies.
Replacement • Legal minimum requirement only sets the baseline if replacement / refurbishment
itself is required by law / is obligatory. • Product/technology had to be replaced: Baseline is set at the market average. • Early replacement: Baseline is set at the energy consumption of the old
product/technology.
Heating demand
kWh/m²a
Energy efficiency measures must be „additional“
Measures are eligible if they go beyond legal requirements and are
better than the existing stock or the market average.
Legal requirements Market average
Heating demand
kWh/m²a
Building code Eligible savings
kWh/m²a
Efficient Building
(New building)
A+ A++
Legal requirement
Eligible savings
kWh/a
Market average
A+++
Purchased device
Use Case 1: new buildings
A new residential building will be put up. The legal requirement permits a heating demand for residential buildings.
Subsidy leads to a better energy performance than legal requirements.
The difference of heating demand can be taken into account as energy saving.
Example of a single family house:
Legal requirement: 50 kWh/m²a
Real heating demand: 20 kWh/m²a
Floor area of building: 150 m²
Expenditure factor of heating system: 120%
Energy saving = 150 x ( 50 – 20 ) x 1.2 = 5,200 kWh/a
Use Case 2: refurbishment of buildings
An existing building will be renovated due to a subsidy. Without subsidy this renovation wouldn’t take place.
The difference of heating demand of the old building and the refurbished one can be taken into account as energy saving.
Example of a single family house:
Building’s heating demand before renovation: 150 kWh/m²a
Building’s heating demand after renovation: 50 kWh/m²a
Floor area of building: 150 m²
Expenditure factor of the heating system: 120%
Energy saving = 150 x ( 150 – 50 ) x 1.2 = 18,000 kWh/a
Use Case 3: new heating system
A new building would be equipped with an average heating system. A subsidy leads to a connection to the district heating system instead.
The difference of the final energy demand of district heat in comparison to the fuel demand of an average heating system can be taken into account as energy saving.
Example of a single family house:
Building’s heating demand: 50 kWh/m²a
Floor area of building: 150 m²
Expenditure factor of an average heating system: 120%
Expenditure factor of a district heating system: 105%
Energy saving = 150 x 50 x ( 1.2 - 1.05 ) = 1,125 kWh/a
Use Case 4: refurbishment of heating systems
An existing heating system will be modernized (by a condensing boiler) due to a subsidy.
The difference of the efficiencies of the old and the new heating system can be taken into account as energy saving.
Example of a single family house:
Building’s heating demand: 50 kWh/m²a
Floor area of building: 150 m²
Expenditure factor of the old heating system: 180%
Expenditure factor of the new heating system: 120%
Energy saving = 150 x 50 x ( 1.8 - 1.2 ) = 4,500 kWh/a
• Within the policy measures
• no double counting due to information available on end customers
(name, address)
• Double counting control easily possible
• Between policy measures
• Conservative approach
• All individual measures with potential double counting are counted
only once
Double counting
Success factors
• Buildings on existing experiences (ESD reporting, voluntary agreements)
• Standardised report procedures and reporting templates
• Clear definition of eligible measures
• Clear definition of evaluation and documentation requirements
• Use default evaluation values for standard measures (especially in households)
and use the deemed savings approach in all possible cases
• Regular update of default values for generalised methods
• Performing checks on paper files instead of on-site as much as possible
• Introduction of a paperless process
• Automation of the monitoring process (e.g. use of databases)
• Clear and transparent rules adequately communicated to all actors
Monitoring and verification - success factors
Gregor Thenius Scientific Officer
ÖSTERREICHISCHE ENERGIEAGENTUR
AUSTRIAN ENERGY AGENCY
—
Mariahilfer Straße 136 | 1150 Vienna | Austria
[email protected] | www.energyagency.at
Contact