I Background and Objectives
Transcript of I Background and Objectives
![Page 1: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
I • Background and Objectives
II • Merits of the New Evaluation Framework
III • Scope and Implementation Schedule
IV • New Post-Project Evaluation Form and
Workflow for Handling
V • Post-Project Evaluation Form (Sample)
VI • Q & A Session
2
![Page 3: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
I. Background and Objectives
3
![Page 4: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
To gauge the effectiveness of ITF in supporting industry needs.
To track how far the R&D deliverables are realised/commercialised.
Structured and comprehensive evaluation system to assess the outcome of ITF-funded projects.
4
![Page 5: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Shortcomings of Existing Framework
One-off in about 6 months after project completion: too soon for realisation/commercialisation, no further tracking and following-up in a systematic manner.
Survey feedbacks in narrative form: difficult to analyse and generate report for management.
5
![Page 6: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
II. Merits of the New Evaluation Framework
6
![Page 7: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
More extensive coverage on efforts in dissemination and transfer of project deliverables and technologies up to 5 years after project completion.
Quantitative feedback on adoption of project results by the industry where applicable.
Post-project evaluation questionnaires used to be submitted by fax in the past, the new evaluation form will adopt electronic mode of submission.
7
![Page 8: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
III. Scope and Implementation Schedule
8
![Page 9: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Scope: all Tier 2 platform projects and Tier 3 projects
Implementation Schedule: Projects completed on or after 30 June 2014.
9
![Page 10: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
IV. New Post-Project Evaluation Form and
Workflow for Handling
10
![Page 11: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Part A (Key Project Details) – automatically filled by system.
11
![Page 12: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Part B (Report on Progress of Commercialisation/Technology Transfer Activities) – completed by Project Coordinator (PC) / Organisation Manager / Technology Transfer Office (or by a designated person on behalf of the research institute) in 2 years and 5 years after project completion (reporting timeframe may be adjusted on case-by-case basis).
12
![Page 13: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
System will automatically bring up the case when due for assessment.
13
![Page 14: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Note: ITC’s Subject Officer may adjust the timeframe for completion of Part B (e.g. request for additional return) as deemed fit.
Designated Local Public Research
Institute (Note)
• Project Coordinator (PC)/
Organisation Manager / Technology
Transfer Office (or by an designated
person on behalf of the research
institute) to fill in Part B1 of the
evaluation form (submitted through
Organisation Manager of the
research institute) to report on
progress of commercialisation/
technology transfer activities about
2 years after project completion.
• Commercialisation results reported
by the PC/TTO will be jointly
assessed by the ITSP Assessment
Panel and ITC.
#2
ITC Technical Team
• The evaluation
results will serve as a
useful reference in
future assessment of
new ITSP
applications
#4
About 2 years after project completion
About 5 years after project completion
Designated Local Public Research
Institute (Note)
• Project Coordinator (PC)/
Organisation Manager / Technology
Transfer Office (or by an designated
person on behalf of the research
institute) to fill in Part B2 of the
evaluation form (submitted through
Organisation Manager of the
research institute) to report on
progress of commercialisation/
technology transfer activities about
5 years after project completion.
• Commercialisation results reported
by the PC/TTO will be jointly
assessed by the ITSP Assessment
Panel and ITC.
#3
ITC Admin Team
• Input the assessment
scores of the project
concerned into the
Evaluation Form
template generated
automatically by
ITCFAS.
#1
About 5 months after project completion
![Page 15: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
V. Post-Project Evaluation Form (Sample)
15
![Page 16: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
![Page 17: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
![Page 18: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
![Page 19: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
![Page 20: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
![Page 21: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
![Page 22: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
![Page 23: I Background and Objectives](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012712/61ab592572cb842cf528f589/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
VI. Q & A Session
23