Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

12
Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA Stephanie Sublett University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics 46th Annual Meeting of the American Physical Society Division of Plasma Physics Savannah, GA 15–19 November 2004 0.96 mm 0.96 mm

Transcript of Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

Page 1: Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

Hydrodynamic Jet Experimentson OMEGA

Stephanie SublettUniversity of RochesterLaboratory for Laser Energetics

46th Annual Meeting of theAmerican Physical SocietyDivision of Plasma Physics

Savannah, GA15–19 November 2004

0.96 mm0.96 mm

Page 2: Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

Collaborators

J. P. Knauer, I. V. Igumenshchev, and D. D. MeyerhoferUniversity of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics

A. FrankUniversity of Rochester, Department of Physics and Astronomy

B. Blue, H. F. Robey, and T. S. PerryLawrence Livermore National Laboratory

P. Keiter, R. Coker, and B. H. WildeLos Alamos National Laboratory

J. M. Foster and P. A. RosenAtomic Weapons Establishment, Aldermaston, UK

R. P. DrakeUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Page 3: Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

E13368

Evolution of either the ambient response to a jetor the jet material itself can be studied by judiciousselection of backlighter and target materials

• A set of experiments has been designed and conductedto observe jet features using the OMEGA Laser.

• Jet features predicted by analytic theory and hydrodynamicsimulations are observed in the experimental data.

• Measured axial jet velocities are consistent with outputfrom 2-D hydrodynamic simulations.

Summary

Page 4: Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

E13369

The observation of key jet features in laboratoryexperiments can be used to constrain models

Bowshock

Cocoon

Jet beam Interface

Ambientmedium

Page 5: Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

E13370

Backlighter targets are used to produce side-on point-projection radiographs1 of hydrodynamic jet targets

11 backlighterbeams

Drive beams are fired 100 or 150 ns before the backlighter beams.

7 drivebeams

1D. K. Bradley et al., Opt. Lett. 27, 134 (2002).

Page 6: Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

E13371

Jets are formed by ablating material from metal plugsthrough a washer into a foam

0.52 mm

AlTi

CH (100 mg/cc) foam

0.3 mm 2 mm

W

Page 7: Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

E13372

V was used to backlight Al jets at 100 and 150 nsto enhance structure in the ambient medium

This backlighter was optimized for sensitivity to the CH foam,so the evolution of several shock surfaces can be observed.

100 ns 150 ns

1.1 mm1.1 mm

1.6 mm1.6 mm

Page 8: Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

E13373

A simulation of the 100-ns data overestimatesthe jet expansion

• The beam opening angle and axial velocity are too large.• The front of the cocoon and interface region are similar.• The jet beam is not visible in the experiment.

B. H. Wilde, p. 11, 11/2/04, LA-UR-04-6671

1.5 mm1.5 mm1.1 mm1.1 mm

Page 9: Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

E13374

Fe was used to backlight Ti jets at 100 and 150 nsto show structure in the jet core

This backlighter is sensitive to the jet core, formed fromthe Ti-plug material, which remains collimated as it propagates.

100 ns 150 ns

0.96 mm0.96 mm 1.3 mm1.3 mm

Page 10: Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

E13375

Instabilities can be tracked in the Ti jet data

• Axisymmetric simulations predict a flat working surface,while experiments exhibit 3-D instabilities.

• 3-D simulations will be needed for a quantitative comparison.

• Predicted Ti jet velocities match experimental values.

Simulation Experiment

B. H. Wilde, p. 11, 11/2/04, LA-UR-04-6671

1.0 mm1.0 mm 0.96 mm0.96 mm

Page 11: Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

E13828

Simulations predict the axial velocity of the Al jet

• Shockwave breakout from the washer occurs at 70 to 75 nsfor upper simulation, past 100 ns in lower simulation,and before 100 ns in experiments.

• The experimental data points at 100 and 150 ns, shownwith diamonds, are consistent with the simulation predictions.

Upper simulation:

ALE code2.5-µm resolutiontemperature drive

Lower simulation:

Eulerian PPM code10-µm resolutionlaser energy drive

10 30 50 70 90 110 130 150

Time (ns)

0

20

40

Vel

oci

ty (µm

/ns) 30

10

Page 12: Hydrodynamic Jet Experiments on OMEGA

E13368

Evolution of either the ambient response to a jetor the jet material itself can be studied by judiciousselection of backlighter and target materials

• A set of experiments has been designed and conductedto observe jet features using the OMEGA Laser.

• Jet features predicted by analytic theory and hydrodynamicsimulations are observed in the experimental data.

• Measured axial jet velocities are consistent with outputfrom 2-D hydrodynamic simulations.

Summary/Conclusions