Particle emission in hydrodynamic picture of ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions
Hydrodynamic Analysis of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions at RHIC and LHC
description
Transcript of Hydrodynamic Analysis of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions at RHIC and LHC
Hydrodynamic Analysis of Hydrodynamic Analysis of Relativistic Heavy Ion CollisionsRelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions
at RHIC and LHCat RHIC and LHC
Tetsufumi HiranoTetsufumi HiranoThe Univ. of Tokyo & LBNLThe Univ. of Tokyo & LBNL
Collaborators: Pasi Huovinen and Yasushi NaraPrepared for invited review paper in
Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics
Heavy Ion Tea, LBNL , Oct.11, 2010Heavy Ion Tea, LBNL , Oct.11, 2010
Activities in the Univ. of Tokyo since 2006, stimulated by HITActivities in the Univ. of Tokyo since 2006, stimulated by HIT
OutlineOutline IntroductionIntroduction Some highlights from the hybrid modelSome highlights from the hybrid model Model: QGP fluid + hadronic cascade pictureModel: QGP fluid + hadronic cascade picture Results at RHIC: Results at RHIC:
vv22 source functionsource function
Prediction at RHIC and LHC:Prediction at RHIC and LHC: vv22 in U+U collisions in U+U collisions vv22 in Pb+Pb collisions in Pb+Pb collisions
SummarySummary
IntroductionIntroduction Main aim: Understanding RHIC data based on Main aim: Understanding RHIC data based on
a systematic analysis with QGP perfect fluid pia systematic analysis with QGP perfect fluid picturecture
After press release of perfect fluid discovery in After press release of perfect fluid discovery in 2005 2005 Much progress: hadronic dissipation, Much progress: hadronic dissipation, eccentricity fluctuation, lattice EoS, CGC initial eccentricity fluctuation, lattice EoS, CGC initial condition…condition…
Set a baseline for viscous hydro calculationsSet a baseline for viscous hydro calculations Prediction for U+U at RHIC and Pb+Pb at LHCPrediction for U+U at RHIC and Pb+Pb at LHC
Ollitrault (’92)
Hydro behaviorHydro behavior
Spatial AnisotropySpatial Anisotropy
Momentum AnisotropyMomentum Anisotropy
INPUTINPUT
OUTPUTOUTPUT
Interaction amongInteraction amongproduced particlesproduced particles
dN/d
No secondary interactionNo secondary interaction
0 2dN
/d
0 2
2v2
x
y
Elliptic FlowElliptic FlowHow does the system respond to spatial anisotropy?How does the system respond to spatial anisotropy?
Importance of Hadronic DissipationImportance of Hadronic Dissipation
QGP only QGP+hadron fluids
QGP fluid+hadron gas
Suppression in forward and backward rapiditySuppression in forward and backward rapidityImportance of hadronic viscosityImportance of hadronic viscosity
TH et al.,(’05)
Mass Splitting = Hadronic effectsMass Splitting = Hadronic effects
Mass dependence is o.k. from hydro+cascade. When mass splitting appears?
20-30%
Proton
Pion
Mass ordering comes fromhadronic rescattering effect. Interplay btw. radial and elliptic flows.
TH et al.,(’08)
Violation of Mass SplittingViolation of Mass Splitting
Au+Au 200 GeVb=7.2fm
TH et al.,(’08)
ModelModel No single model to understand heavy ion collisNo single model to understand heavy ion collis
ion as a whole.ion as a whole. Idea: Employ “cutting edge” modules as far as Idea: Employ “cutting edge” modules as far as
possiblepossible 3D ideal hydro3D ideal hydro Hadronic transport model, JAMHadronic transport model, JAM Lattice EoS + resonance gas in JAMLattice EoS + resonance gas in JAM Monte Carlo Glauber/KLN for initial conditionMonte Carlo Glauber/KLN for initial condition
A Hybrid Approach: A Hybrid Approach: Initial ConditionInitial Condition
0collision axis
time
AuAu AuAu
QGP fluid
hadron gasModel*
•MC-Glauber•MC-KLN (CGC)
• part, R.P.
• Centrality cut
0-10%
10-20%20-30%
…
*H.J.Drescher and Y.Nara (2007)
Initial Condition w.r.t. Participant PlaInitial Condition w.r.t. Participant Planene
Shift: (<x>,<y>)Shift: (<x>,<y>)Rotation:Rotation:
Throw a diceThrow a diceto choose to choose bband calculateand calculateNNpartpart averageaverage
over eventsover events
averageaverageover eventsover events
E.g.)E.g.)NNpartpart
minmin= 279= 279NNpartpart
maxmax= 394= 394in Au+Au collisionsin Au+Au collisionsat 0-10% centralityat 0-10% centrality
Participant planeParticipant plane
Reaction planeReaction plane
partpart and and R.P.R.P.
Au+AuAu+Au Cu+CuCu+Cu
•Eccentricity enhanced due to fluctuationEccentricity enhanced due to fluctuation•Significant in small system, e.g., Cu+Cu, perpheal Au+AuSignificant in small system, e.g., Cu+Cu, perpheal Au+Au•MC-KLN > MC-Glauber *MC-KLN > MC-Glauber *
*See, Drescher and Nara, PRC 75, 034905 (2007).*See, Drescher and Nara, PRC 75, 034905 (2007).
A Hybrid Approach: A Hybrid Approach: HydrodynamicsHydrodynamics
0collision axis
time
AuAu AuAu
QGP fluid
hadron gasIdeal Hydrodynamics#
•Initial time 0.6 fm/c•Lattice + HRG EoS*
##Hirano (2002),*Huovinen and Petreczky (2010) + JAM HRGHirano (2002),*Huovinen and Petreczky (2010) + JAM HRG
A Hybrid Approach: A Hybrid Approach: Hadronic CascadeHadronic Cascade
0collision axis
time
AuAu AuAu
QGP fluid
hadron gas Interface• Cooper-Frye formulaat switching temperatureTsw = 155 MeVHadronic afterburner• Hadronic transportmodel based on kinetictheory JAM*
*Y.Nara et al., (2000)
Comparison of Comparison of Hydro+Cascade ResultsHydro+Cascade Results
with Available Datawith Available Data
ppTT Spectra: MC-Glauber Spectra: MC-Glauber
Filled: PHENIX, PRC69, 034909 (2004), Open: Hydro+cascadeFilled: PHENIX, PRC69, 034909 (2004), Open: Hydro+cascadeFrom top to bottom, 0-5, 5-10, 10-15, …, 70-80% centralityFrom top to bottom, 0-5, 5-10, 10-15, …, 70-80% centrality
(1) Absolute value of entropy, (2) soft/hard fraction (1) Absolute value of entropy, (2) soft/hard fraction = = 0.18, and (3) switching temperature T0.18, and (3) switching temperature Tswsw = 155 MeV. = 155 MeV.
ppTT Spectra: MC-KLN Spectra: MC-KLN
(1) Absolute value of saturation scale and (2) scaling (1) Absolute value of saturation scale and (2) scaling parameters parameters =0.28 and (3) switching temperature T=0.28 and (3) switching temperature Tss
ww = 155 MeV = 155 MeV
Filled: PHENIX, PRC69, 034909 (2004), Open: Hydro+cascadeFilled: PHENIX, PRC69, 034909 (2004), Open: Hydro+cascadeFrom top to bottom, 0-5, 5-10, 10-15, …, 70-80% centralityFrom top to bottom, 0-5, 5-10, 10-15, …, 70-80% centrality
vv22(N(Npartpart))
Au+AuAu+Au Cu+CuCu+Cu
MC-GlauberMC-Glauber: : Apparent reproduction. No room for QGP viscosity?Apparent reproduction. No room for QGP viscosity?MC-KLNMC-KLN::Overshoot due to larger eccentricity. How small QGP Overshoot due to larger eccentricity. How small QGP viscosity?viscosity?
ppTT>0>0 ppTT>0>0
PHOBOS, PRC72, 051901 (2005); PRL98, 242302 (2007).PHOBOS, PRC72, 051901 (2005); PRL98, 242302 (2007).
vv22(centrality)(centrality)
Au+AuAu+Au Cu+CuCu+Cu
•ppTT cut enhances v cut enhances v22 by ~10% by ~10%•STAR data in Au+Au corrected by Ollitrault et al.*STAR data in Au+Au corrected by Ollitrault et al.*•vv22 w.r.t. participant plane w.r.t. participant plane
0.15 < p0.15 < pT T < 2 GeV/c< 2 GeV/c0.15 < p0.15 < pT T < 2 GeV/c< 2 GeV/c
*J.Y.Ollitrault, A.M.Poskanzer and S.A.Voloshin, PRC80, 014904 (200*J.Y.Ollitrault, A.M.Poskanzer and S.A.Voloshin, PRC80, 014904 (2009).9).
vv22(p(pTT) for PID Particles) for PID Particles•Results based on MC-Results based on MC-Glauber initializationGlauber initialization•Mass splitting pattern OKMass splitting pattern OK•A little bit overshoot evenA little bit overshoot evenin low pin low pTT region region Centrality dependence Centrality dependence (next slide)?(next slide)?
PHENIX, PRL91, 182301 (2003)PHENIX, PRL91, 182301 (2003)
0-80%0-80%
vv22(p(pTT) for PID Particles: ) for PID Particles: Centrality DependenceCentrality Dependence
0-20%0-20%
20-40%20-40%
40-60%40-60%
•Hydro+cascade withHydro+cascade withMC-Glauber at workMC-Glauber at workin 0-20% centralityin 0-20% centrality•Need QGP viscosityNeed QGP viscosity•Or, need jet or Or, need jet or recombination/coalescencerecombination/coalescencecomponents?components?•MC-KLN results not availableMC-KLN results not availableyet due to less statisticsyet due to less statistics
PHENIX, PRL91, 182301 (2003)PHENIX, PRL91, 182301 (2003)
vv22(p(pTT) for Charged Particles: Au+Au) for Charged Particles: Au+Au
•Hydro+cascade with MC-Glauber at work in low pHydro+cascade with MC-Glauber at work in low pTT
•ppTT region at work shrinks as moving to peripheral region at work shrinks as moving to peripheral Importance of viscosityImportance of viscosity PHENIX, PRC80, 024909 (2009).PHENIX, PRC80, 024909 (2009).
STAR, PRC72, 014904 (2005). STAR, PRC72, 014904 (2005).
vv22(p(pTT) for Charged Particles: Cu+Cu) for Charged Particles: Cu+Cu
•Tendency is the same as that in Au+Au collisionsTendency is the same as that in Au+Au collisions
PHENIX, PRL98, 162301 (2007).PHENIX, PRL98, 162301 (2007).STAR, PRC81, 044902 (2010). STAR, PRC81, 044902 (2010).
vv22(p(pTT) for Charged Particles: Au+Au) for Charged Particles: Au+Au
•Hydro+cascade with Hydro+cascade with MC-KLNMC-KLN at work at work in central collisionsin central collisions
PHENIX, PRC80, 024909 (2009).PHENIX, PRC80, 024909 (2009).STAR, PRC72, 014904 (2005). STAR, PRC72, 014904 (2005).
MC-KLN vs. MC-GlauberMC-KLN vs. MC-Glauber
Slope of vSlope of v22(p(pTT))steeper in MC-KLNsteeper in MC-KLNthan in MC-Glauberthan in MC-Glauber vv2,MC-KLN2,MC-KLN > v > v2,MC-Glauber2,MC-Glauber
•ppTT dependent viscous dependent viscouscorrection at T=Tcorrection at T=Tswsw
might interpret the datamight interpret the data•Extracted transportExtracted transportcoefficients depend oncoefficients depend oninitial conditioninitial condition
Conventional Femtoscopic AnalysisConventional Femtoscopic AnalysisParticle sourceParticle source
Detector 1Detector 1
Detector 2Detector 2
Hanbury Brown – Twiss (1956)Hanbury Brown – Twiss (1956)Goldhaber – Goldhaber – Lee – Pais (1960)Goldhaber – Goldhaber – Lee – Pais (1960)
Source size of Source size of particle emissionparticle emission(Homogeneity region)(Homogeneity region) Information in Information in configuration spaceconfiguration space
New Technique: Source ImagingNew Technique: Source Imaging
Koonin-Pratt eq.:
Inverse problemInverse problem
Source function and emission rate:Source function and emission rate:
Primed (‘) variables in Pair Center-of-Mass SystemPrimed (‘) variables in Pair Center-of-Mass System
Brown, Danielewicz(1997)Brown, Danielewicz(1997)
1D Source Function for Pions1D Source Function for Pions
With hadronicWith hadronicrescattering and decaysrescattering and decays
Without hadronicWithout hadronicrescattering and decaysrescattering and decays
Non-Gaussian tail in pion source functionNon-Gaussian tail in pion source functionfrom hybrid modelfrom hybrid model
Au+Au, 0-30%Au+Au, 0-30%0.3 < k0.3 < kTT < 0.9 GeV/c < 0.9 GeV/c
Au+Au, 0-30%Au+Au, 0-30%0.3 < k0.3 < kTT < 0.9 GeV/c < 0.9 GeV/c
PHENIX, PRL103, 142301(2009)PHENIX, PRL103, 142301(2009)
1D Source Function for Kaons1D Source Function for Kaons
With hadronicWith hadronicrescattering and decaysrescattering and decays
Without hadronicWithout hadronicrescattering and decaysrescattering and decays
Non-Gaussian tail in kaon source functionNon-Gaussian tail in kaon source functionfrom hybrid modelfrom hybrid model
Au+Au, 0-30%Au+Au, 0-30%0.3 < k0.3 < kTT < 0.9 GeV/c < 0.9 GeV/c
Au+Au, 0-30%Au+Au, 0-30%0.3 < k0.3 < kTT < 0.9 GeV/c < 0.9 GeV/c
PHENIX, PRL103, 142301(2009)PHENIX, PRL103, 142301(2009)
Emission Rate for PionsEmission Rate for Pions
0-30% Au+Au, pions, 0.3 < p0-30% Au+Au, pions, 0.3 < pxx < 0.9 GeV/c < 0.9 GeV/cWithoutWithout hadronic rescattering or decays hadronic rescattering or decays Negative x-t correlationNegative x-t correlation
Emission Rate for PionsEmission Rate for Pions
0-30% Au+Au, pions, 0.3 < p0-30% Au+Au, pions, 0.3 < pxx < 0.9 GeV/c < 0.9 GeV/cWithWith hadronic rescattering and decays hadronic rescattering and decays Positive x-t correlation(?)Positive x-t correlation(?)
Emission Rate for KaonsEmission Rate for Kaons
0-30% Au+Au, 0-30% Au+Au, kaonskaons, 0.3 < p, 0.3 < pxx < 0.9 GeV/c < 0.9 GeV/cWithoutWithout hadronic rescattering or decays hadronic rescattering or decays Negative x-t correlationNegative x-t correlation
Emission Rate for KaonsEmission Rate for Kaons
0-30% Au+Au, 0-30% Au+Au, kaonskaons, 0.3 < p, 0.3 < pxx < 0.9 GeV/c < 0.9 GeV/cWithWith hadronic rescattering and decays hadronic rescattering and decays Positive x-t correlation(?)Positive x-t correlation(?)
Predictions from Predictions from Hydro+Cascade ModelHydro+Cascade Model
Collisions of Deformed Nuclei at RHICCollisions of Deformed Nuclei at RHIC
•How vHow v22// behaves as behaves asincreasing multiplicity?*increasing multiplicity?*
•Saturate?Saturate?•Still enhance?Still enhance?
U+U collision in run12U+U collision in run12at RHIC(?)at RHIC(?)•More multiplicityMore multiplicity•Larger eccentricityLarger eccentricity
STAR, PRC66, 034904 (2002)STAR, PRC66, 034904 (2002)*U.Heinz and A. Kuhlman, *U.Heinz and A. Kuhlman, PRL94, 132301 (2005).PRL94, 132301 (2005).
Eccentricity in U+U Collisions at RHICEccentricity in U+U Collisions at RHIC
•Larger eccentricityLarger eccentricity•Finite eccentricity at Finite eccentricity at zero impact parameterzero impact parameterbody-body collisionbody-body collision•Unable to controlUnable to controlconfiguration configuration Need NeedMonte-Carlo study andMonte-Carlo study andevent selection*event selection*
*See, e.g., P.Filip et al. PRC80, 054903 (2009).*See, e.g., P.Filip et al. PRC80, 054903 (2009).
0-5%0-5% 0.146 (MC-Glauber), 0.148 (MC-KLN) 0.146 (MC-Glauber), 0.148 (MC-KLN)
vv22 in U+U Collisions in U+U Collisions
•vv22 increases due to deformation of colliding nuclei. increases due to deformation of colliding nuclei.•vv22// scales with transverse density. scales with transverse density.•Maximum transverse density increases only by ~10%Maximum transverse density increases only by ~10%in central U+U collisions.in central U+U collisions.
Prediction at LHCPrediction at LHC
Eccentricity does notEccentricity does notchange from RHIC to LHC!change from RHIC to LHC!Change due solely to size Change due solely to size
vv22// does not follow does not followRHIC scaling curveRHIC scaling curve
vv22// Scales at Fixed Collision Energy Scales at Fixed Collision Energy
Increase multiplicityIncrease multiplicitywith fixed centrality.with fixed centrality.
Pick up pointsPick up pointswith fixed centralitywith fixed centrality
consistentconsistent
P.F.Kolb et al., PRC62, 054909 (2000)P.F.Kolb et al., PRC62, 054909 (2000)
SummarySummary Current status of the hybrid approachCurrent status of the hybrid approach
Elliptic flowElliptic flow MC-Glauber initialization gives a reasonable agreement with data iMC-Glauber initialization gives a reasonable agreement with data i
n very central collisions.n very central collisions. Results deviate from data as moving away from central collisions.Results deviate from data as moving away from central collisions. QGP viscosity?QGP viscosity?
Source functionSource function Non-Gaussian tail is seen through hadronic rescatterings and decaNon-Gaussian tail is seen through hadronic rescatterings and deca
ysys PredictionPrediction
Results in U+U collisions follow scaling behavior, extend (1/S)dNResults in U+U collisions follow scaling behavior, extend (1/S)dNchch
/d/d by ~10% by ~10% vv22// at LHC does not follow scaling seen at RHIC at LHC does not follow scaling seen at RHIC
Thank You!Thank You!
Available at
BACKUPBACKUPSLIDESSLIDES
ppTT Spectra in STAR and PHENIX Spectra in STAR and PHENIX
Central:Central:Consistent btw. Consistent btw. STAR and PHENIXSTAR and PHENIX
Peripheral:Peripheral:(STAR) > (PHENIX)(STAR) > (PHENIX)STAR data are 50 %STAR data are 50 %larger than PHENIX datalarger than PHENIX data
STAR, PRC 79, 034909 (2009)STAR, PRC 79, 034909 (2009)PHENIX, PRC69, 034909 (2004)PHENIX, PRC69, 034909 (2004)
Steeper Transverse Profile in CGCSteeper Transverse Profile in CGC
Closer to hard spherethan Glauber
Note: Original KLNmodel (not fKLN)
Event Distributions from Monte CarloEvent Distributions from Monte Carlo
Centrality cut is doneCentrality cut is doneaccording to Naccording to Npartpart
Correlation btw. NCorrelation btw. Npartpart and N and Ncollcoll
Au+AuAu+Au U+UU+U
NNpartpart NNpartpart
NNco
llco
ll
NNco
llco
ll
Eccentricity FluctuationEccentricity Fluctuation
Interaction points of participants vary event by eveInteraction points of participants vary event by event.nt. Apparent reaction plane also varies.Apparent reaction plane also varies. The effect is significant for smaller system such The effect is significant for smaller system such as Cu+Cu collisionsas Cu+Cu collisions
Adopted from D.Hofman(PHOBOS),Adopted from D.Hofman(PHOBOS),talk at QM2006talk at QM2006
A sample eventA sample eventfrom Monte Carlofrom Monte CarloGlauber modelGlauber model
i
0
Event-by-Event EccentricityEvent-by-Event Eccentricity
Normalization in Source FunctionNormalization in Source Function
Source function multiplied by phase space densitySource function multiplied by phase space density
Comparison of Source FunctionsComparison of Source Functions
Both normalized to be unityBoth normalized to be unity
Normalization in PHENIX???Normalization in PHENIX???
(fm
-2)