PREPARED BY OCHA BASED ON INPUTS FROM THE SECTORS/CLUSTERS

2017

RESPONSE PLANHUMANITARIANMONITORING REPORT

©David Hempenstall/Oxfam

Kachin/Shan In Kachin State, over 91,000 people remain displaced

in camps/camp-like settings, of which approximately

76 per cent are women and children. In December,

fighting re-erupted in several townships in Kachin, with the

military shelling close to an IDP camp in Laiza and small-scale

displacements in other areas. The sustained threat of security

incidents contributes to reduced freedom of movement and access

to services (including sexual and reproductive health services)

and markets for women and girls, impacting on their wellbeing.

Prolonged displacement has put a strain not only on the displaced

but also on host communities’ coping mechanisms. During 2017,

there was a significant deterioration in humanitarian access in

Kachin, including in Government control areas. Since April 2016,

the Government and military have not permitted international

humanitarian organizations to take food or other relief supplies

into areas beyond Government control. While local humanitarian

actors have greater access, it remains incomplete and

unpredictable in recent months. While humanitarian assistance

has been delivered regularly to IDPs in all accessible locations

since 2011, the current lack of sustained and predictable

humanitarian access remains a considerable challenge.

In Shan State, over 9,000 people remain displaced in

camps/camp-like settings, of which about 80 per cent are women

and children. Sporadic fighting continues to be reported in

northern Shan, further compounding the situation. In late

December, over 1,000 people were displaced due to fighting in

the Namhsan area. In early March 2017, a series of attacks

reportedly carried out by members of the Myanmar National

Democratic Alliance Army (MNDAA) in Laukkaing, in the

Kokang Self-Administered Zone (SAZ), temporarily displaced

an estimated 30,000 people. Displacement in Shan State is often

temporary, with many of the displaced returning home after fairly

short periods of time. As in Kachin, 2017 saw a further

deterioration in access for humanitarian organizations in Shan

State, leaving some locations which were previously accessible

off-limits. Access difficulties have resulted in a reduction in the

quantity and quality of humanitarian support to displaced people

and other vulnerable communities. Shan and Kachin continue to

be highly affected by landmines. In 2017, 80 per cent of casualties

in Myanmar are reported in these two states.

Rakhine In Rakhine State, more than 130,000 people remain

displaced in camps/camp-like-settings as a result of the

inter-communal violence in 2012. Prolonged

displacement, compounded by ongoing movement restrictions

that constrain access to essential services, including formal

education, healthcare and livelihoods, continues to cause

increased vulnerability and a high level of dependency on

humanitarian assistance. The situation has been further

compounded by labour and trade restrictions recently imposed on

Muslim people following the 25 August attacks which further

deteriorated access to livelihoods and food. The United Nations

and its humanitarian partners liaise closely with the Union and

Rakhine State Governments. Furthermore, while the Government

swiftly endorsed the recommendations of the Rakhine Advisory

Commission regarding the closure of IDP camps, the

implementation that started in May and was revived last October

raises a number of protection concerns. The HCT remains

committed to support the Government in implementation of the

recommendation in the spirit they were written, addressing

fundamental issues of freedom of movement and access to

livelihoods to allow for dignified solutions to displacement. In

northern part of Rakhine, at the end of 2017, more than 655,000

people fled to Bangladesh since 25 August, according to the

United Nations in Bangladesh. The vast majority of those

affected are Stateless Muslims who identify themselves as

Rohingya. The exodus of people from northern Rakhine slowed

towards the end of 2017 but small scale departures are continuing

amid ongoing reports of arson attacks, killings, arbitrary arrests,

looting, harassment, loss of livelihoods and limited access to

food. Those arriving in Bangladesh continue to report that they

have been subjected to a range of abuses including grave

violations against children both before and during their journeys

to Bangladesh. The majority of the approximately 27,000 ethnic

Rakhine and other minority groups who were displaced in the

wake of the violence, have since returned to their homes,

according to the Government.

Since August, UN and INGO’s humanitarian support in northern

Rakhine have mostly been rejected, with the exception of WFP

who were permitted to resume food deliveries in November.

Some small scale and localized UN and INGO activities have also

been permitted to resume. However, due to lack of humanitarian

access, there is no comprehensive information available to show

coverage and gaps across all communities. The Myanmar

Government has established the Union Enterprise for

Humanitarian Assistance, Resettlement and Development which

is coordinating the response from the authorities. The

Government is also working with the International Red Cross and

Red Crescent Movement to provide support to affected people.

The Arrangement on return of displaced persons from Rakhine

State was signed by the Governments of Myanmar and

Bangladesh on 23 November 2017. Subsequently on 19

December 2017 in Dhaka an Agreement was reached on the ToRs

of a Joint Working Group to oversee the repatriation process. The

Joint Working Group will work together to take the necessary

decisions, through a consultative and consensus building process.

The work of the Joint Working Group will adhere to the general

principles, policy aspects and modalities as stated in the

Arrangement. However, the more challenging issue concerns the

development of conditions on the ground – such as freedom of

movement and access to livelihoods – that may encourage safe,

voluntary and dignified return.

Natural disasters In 2017, Cyclone Mora brought strong winds and heavy

rains in Myanmar, destroying over 16,000 houses in

Rakhine and Chin states and Ayeyarwady Region.

Rakhine was the most affected state and, in addition to the houses

that were destroyed, over 60 per cent of the temporary shelters in

IDP camps were damaged or destroyed. Moreover, several

WASH facilities were severely affected with over 60 water point

flooded and some 6,000 latrines required for replacement/repair

in 158 assessed sites/camps. During the 2017 monsoon season,

Myanmar experienced heavy flooding in 13 of the country’s

States/Regions and the Union Territory. According to the Relief

and Resettlement Department (RRD), the cumulative number of

people who were temporarily displaced /evacuated in flood-

affected areas was over 320,000. At least eight people were killed

due to flooding. RRD, state and regional governments, the

Myanmar Military and the Myanmar Red Cross Society (MRCS),

as well as local and international non-governmental

organizations, assisted in the humanitarian response to the floods,

providing food, drinking water, shelter materials, hygiene kits

and other relief items to displaced and other affected people. In

2017, about 30 earthquakes (all with a magnitude lower than 5)

were registered. These earthquakes underline the importance of

disaster risk reduction activities and ongoing efforts to support

the strengthening of national capacities for disaster preparedness

and response. There is a substantial need to build longer-term

resilience, particularly among already vulnerable populations.

CHANGES IN CONTEXT

FUNDED GAP TOTAL $117M $33M $150M

Million USD Million USD

* Information about detailed allocation by sector/location (except for Education,Nutrition and WASH) is not available at the time of reporting. Major recipients ofthese contributions include UNHCR ($13 million), UNICEF ($7 million), Malteser($3 million), SI ($2 million), Deutsche Welthungerhilfe e.V. ($2 million) andDiakonie Katastrophenhilfe ($1.5 million), among others.

Approx. 188,000 IDPs benefited from projects to repair or reconstruct damaged temporary shelters. InKachin, the cash for shelter component of the Naung Pon new settlement project was completedsuccessfully, benefitting some 20 IDP families. A new shelter design developed (approved by theGovernment) to mitigate GBV and provide families with dignity, as new minimum standard for any

future shelter construction or rehabilitation of IDP camps in central Rakhine.

KEY ACHIEVEMENTSSome 8,900 children aged 6-59 months with

severe acute malnutrition received therapeuticcare in Rakhine. Quality of SAM and MAM

treatments are maintained in line with the Spherestandards.

2017 Top Contributions 2017 Funding Per Sector

KEY FIGURES

FUNDING STATUS(USD)

More than 272,000 people received food and/orcash assistance.

Over 46,000 children accessed pre-primary/primary education aligned with formal curricula. InRakhine, temporary learning centers continue to fill critical gaps of essential education provision at

kindergarten and primary level in IDP camps and crisis-affected villages, facilitating students' transitionto formal post-primary schools in Sittwe where available.

More than 334,000 people were assisted withaccess to sufficient quantities of safe drinking

and domestic water. The WASH Cluster workedcollaboratively to design and deliver WASH inEmergency training to NGOS and government

partners.

Over 403,000 affected people were assisted withaccess to primary health care services. Life-saving health assistance to affected people inRakhine immediately after the 25 August 2017

event through CERF-funded health project.

Over 128,000 people had access to minimumprotection services. GBV data systems havebeen consolidated across Kachin, Shan and

Rakhine. Child protection services were expandedin northern Shan through mobile psychosocialactivities while mine risk education increased

across Kachin and northern Shan.

Kachin/Shan

$47.5M(32%)

Rakhine$102.7M(68%)

Kachin/Shan

$21.6M(18%)

Rakhine$73.3M(63%)

Locationnot

specified$22.4M(19%)

22.2

12.0

11.0

10.6

10.5

10.3

9.7

7.8

6.5

6.5

5.3

3.3

2.1

1.7

1.6

USA

Switzerland

ECHO

UK

Sweden

Germany

MHF

Japan

CERF

Australia

Qatar Charity

Denmark

Canada

Norway

France

RequestedHRP

Contribution

35.7

7.0

10.0

11.2

2.6

11.1

2.1

3.0

35 *

14.3

13.3

10.2

5.7

13.9

3.0

5.0

2.1

Food Security

Shelter/ NFIs/ CCCM

Protection

WASH

Health

Nutrition

Education

CCS

Sector not specified/Multiple sectors

FUNDEDGAP

71%

34%

49%

66%

16%

79%

30%

59%

$117M$150M

Funded$117M

Gap$33M

78%HRP

Funded

CONTACT: Jane Strachan (jstrachan@unicef.org)

EDUCATION

Number of targeted children continuously accessing pre-primary/primary education aligned with formal curricula

RAKHINE

Number of targeted children learning in classes taught by education personnel trained in EiE, including life-skills and other child protectioncomponents

Number of targeted adolescents continuously accessing post-primary learning opportunities

In Kachin and Shan, the increasing number of displaced children requiring pre-primary, primary and post-primary education in2017 resulted in pressure on the existing facilities in areas both within and beyond the Government control. The additionalcosts of education –supplies, tuition fees and transportation– are prohibitive for many IDPs. Formal and non-formal postprimary opportunities for adolescents are extremely scarce leaving young people particularly vulnerable to most forcedlabour, recruitment into armed groups and exploitation.In Rakhine, continued displacement and restrictions on freedom of movement continue to undermine children’s access toeducation. The majority of IDP Muslim children remain dependent on in-camp education services. The situation for post-primary education is especially critical with large numbers of adolescents in camps and crisis-affected areas unable to accessquality formal education opportunities which compromise education’s role as a holistic protective agent. After 25th August 65per cent (424 of 650) of schools in northern Rakhine closed.Information provided by the Ministry of Education (MOE) as of 6 December 2017 confirmed that 262 schools had beenreopened employing 1,646 teachers and providing access to 51,002 students.Sector advocacy with the government has resulted in increased collaboration level to support the provision of education toMuslim IDP children in central Rakhine. The MOE has supported the recruitment of 119 volunteer teachers to teach in IDPcamps and Township Education Offices (TEOs) assisted with the provision of some textbooks and supported the participationof TLC students in government‐administered examinations. Despite these improvements in collaboration, the quality ofeducation provided to Muslim IDP children remains a concern.* The targets for Shan were underestimated at the time of planning. Additional needs were identified and addressed duringthe reporting period.

KACHIN SHAN

1.3K

20K

10K

9K

20K

11K

83%

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHEDGAP 2.3K

3.2K

1.3K

35K

59K

39K

2.3K

3.2K

1.5K

5K

35K

14K

3K

20K

7K

0.4K

3.2K

0.9K

26K

76K

27K

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHEDGAP

TARGET

IN NEED

GAP

179% * 89%

13% 153% * 36%

95%45% 47%

REACHED

CONTACT: Andrea Berloffa (andrea.berloffa@fao.org), Masae Shimomura (masae.shimomura@wfp.org)

Number of people/household who received non-agricultural livelihood support to supplement their family income

Number of people/household who received agriculture support, contributing to household food security

Percentage of households with an adequate Food Consumption Score (FCS>35) *

FOOD SECURITY

RAKHINE

Number of people who received food and/or cash assistance

In addition to its initial target beneficiaries under 2017 HRP, the Food Security Sector partners also covered additional needsof the people affected by Cyclone Mora as well as a series of security incidents/operations in the northern part of RakhineState. This includes provision of food/cash assistance to additional 243,800 people, agriculture support to additional 34,500people and non-agriculture livelihood support to some 5,300 people across Rakhine.* The 2017 post distribution monitoring (PDM) was conducted only in Kachin. PDM is usually also carried out bi-annually inRakhine and Shan where the said exercise could not be conducted in 2017due to the fragile security situation. Latestavailable data shows that households with adequate food consumption were 96 per cent in Rakhine (Dec 2016) and 67percent in Shan (Jun 2016).

KACHIN SHAN

76K

89K

84K

14K

19K

16K

182K

210K

182K

76%

80%

80%

-

80%

80%

-

80%

80%

7.3K…

40K

39K

77K

110K

77K

1K

17K

10K

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHEDGAP

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHEDGAP

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHEDGAP

91% 89% 100%

100%

9%

19%

CONTACT: Win Bo (bow@who.int)

Number of affected population utilizing primary health care services

RAKHINE

HEALTH

SHAN

In Rakhine, in addition to long-standing limitations in general health service provision, humanitarian needs continue due tocontinued restrictions on access to health facilities and township hospitals for the Muslim population (including IDPs).Recruitment of skilled staff and retention of existing staff to support health operations continues to be a major challenge.Humanitarian health interventions remain essential until all populations have equitable access to health services throughstrengthening of government capacity and removing the current restrictions on freedom of movement and access to healthfacilities in line with the recommendations of the Rakhine Advisory Commission. In Kachin and Shan, access to healthservices and referral systems remains limited. Access constraints faced by organizations working to establish functionalreferral systems equate to a serious health risk for the affected population.

KACHIN

28K

87K

87K

12K

11K

11K

363K …

377K

377KTARGET

IN NEED

REACHEDGAP

32% 115% 96%

CONTACT: Anne Laevens (alaevens@unicef.org)

Number of children aged 60-119 months with severe acute malnutrition admitted to therapeutic care

Number of children aged 6-59 months with moderate acute malnutrition admitted to therapeutic care

Number of children aged 6-59 months with severe acute malnutrition admitted to therapeutic care

RAKHINE

NUTRITION

Number of pregnant and lactating women who receive messages on infant and young child feeding

* The target has increased from 3,500 to 4,500 as additional needs were identified and addressed during the reporting period.Targets for SAM treatment were not achieved due to suspension of activities and lack of access by nutrition partners inRakhine since 25 August.Targets for MAM treatment and IYCF in Rakhine were not achieved, mainly due to lack of funding and partners to implementMAM and IYCF activities, in addition to lack of access since 25 August.

KACHIN SHAN

9K

16K

16K

4.5K

4.5K

4.5K

8K

61K

32K

2.7K

3.3K

3.3K

0K

1K

1K

11K

38K

21K

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHEDGAP

TARGET *

IN NEED

REACHED

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHEDGAP

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHED

57%

100%

24%

82% 52%GAP

NUTRITION

Stabilization center Outpatient programme

RAKHINE

Supplementary feeding programme

Cure rate, Death rate and Defaulter rate among SAM and MAM children 6-59 months

>75%

<10%

<15%

93.5%

3.7%

2.3%

Cure rate

Death rate

Defaulterrate

TARGET

REACHED

>75%

<10%

<15%

79.5%

0.6%

11.5%

Cure rate

Death rate

Defaulterrate

>75%

<3%

<15%

83.6%

0.05%

13.2%

Cure rate

Death rate

Defaulterrate

CONTACT: Geraldine Salducci Petruccelli (salducci@unhcr.org)

RAKHINE

Number of people in need with access to minimum available protection services (Gender-Based Violence)

KACHIN SHAN

PROTECTION

Number of people in need with access to minimum available protection services

Number of people in need with access to minimum available protection services (Child Protection)

In Rakhine, IDPs' access to protection services was dramatically curtailed due to new cumbersome administrativerequirements for travel authorizations. Increased inter-communal tensions in the central part of Rakhine as a result of the 25August events in northern Rakhine led to self-imposed suspensions of protection activities based on perceived or actualsecurity risks. In Kachin/northern Shan, humanitarian access for both international and national staff was at its lowest in fouryears while intensification of fighting led to new/multiple displacement and increased number of protection incidents.In Kachin/Shan, some 1,700 IDPs with special needs benefited from cash and in-kind assistance. A key GBV mainstreaminginitiative commenced with the establishment of the Menstrual Hygiene Management Working Group. GBV MHPSS capacity tosupport case management interventions has increased significantly with the formation of a MHPSS Peer Support Network.The child protection sector has benefited from piloting the coaching and mentoring package for case management andcontinues to roll out the package in 2018.

46K

89K

89K

6K

11K

11K

77K

145K

145K

18K

62K

62K

2K

8K

8K

58K

101K

101K

7K

24K

24K

0.9K

2.7K

2.7K

14K

39K

39K

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHEDGAP

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHEDGAP

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHEDGAP

51% 53% 53%

29% 26% 57%

29% 35% 36%

CONTACT: Geraldine Salducci Petruccelli (salducci@unhcr.org)

SHELTER/ NON-FOOD ITEMS/ CAMP COORDINATION AND CAMP MANAGEMENT

RAKHINEKACHIN SHAN

Number of IDPs with access to temporary shelter in accordance with minimum standards

Number of IDPs in camp/camp-like settings that have equitable access to basic services

* The difference between the "target" and the "reached" is due to an increase of the camp population in Kachin State at theend of 2017.** The difference between the "in need" and "target" figures with the "reached" figure is explained by changes to the camppopulation.In Kachin/Shan, access restrictions have hampered the delivery of humanitarian assistance while shelter needs could not befully addressed due to lack of funding. The funding gap for shelter interventions is estimated at US$1.8 million. In Rakhine,partners have addressed all the damages due to cyclone Mora as well as additional shelter maintenance/repair as per thecluster’s needs assessments, however the temporary nature of the structures means there always remains shelter needs.

75K

87K

80K

7K

11K

9K

106K

120K

114K

81K

87K

80K

6K

11K

9K

128K

120K

106K

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHEDGAP

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHED

93% 74% 94%

102% * 68% 121% **

CONTACT: Sunny Guidotti (sguidotti@unicef.org)

KACHIN SHAN

For consistency, the WASH Cluster will continue to use the FTS methodology for funds reporting herein. As such, in 2017 theWASH cluster received 80 per cent of required funds. The Rakhine requirements were covered by 90 per cent (US$10.76million out of $12.5), and by 70 per cent for Kachin and Shan ($2.5 million out of $3.9 million, and $392,000 out of $560,000respectively). The WASH cluster continued to provide water supply and treatment, test water quality, train committees, build/repair latrines and showers as well as carry out excreta management/disposal, solid waste management, hygiene promotion and hygiene kits distribution including sanitary pads and underwear. Provision of water supply was the highest result achieved for WASH in 2017 despite the dry season and some sites requiring water boating. Following, 79 per cent of sanitation targets were reached in Kachin, 84 per cent in Shan and 72 per cent in Rakhine. The lowest coverage for WASH was on the hygiene component with coverage of 52 per cent in Kachin, 54 per cent in Rakhine, but 98 per cent in Shan. Key challenges included lack of funding especially for hygiene, limited humanitarian access/travel authorizations, blockage of relief items transportation, lack of space and large-scale damage to sanitation facilities in Rakhine due to cyclone Mora. Besides cyclone Mora, the incidents in the northern part of Rakhine caused disruption of services in Q3. Q4 has seen major repairs undertaken across many camps. In Kachin and northern Shan, frequent displacements and access deteriorated even for national NGOs.Coordination with government and non-state actors was strengthened. A total of 24 ToT and 74 trainees from the government(all WASH line ministries) and local partners received a five-day WASH in Emergency training in Kachin, Shan, Rakhine andMandalay. The strategic framework was developed with a multi-year lens and links to all standards and guidelines. Somestandards were updated including a new cyclone proof latrine design and hygiene kit strategy. New indicators were monitoredsuch as water quality results and sanitary pads distribution. The CDC came from Atlanta to carry out a water quality study andinform the Rakhine strategy. New co-lead Menstrual Hygiene Management TWG with GBV Sector. National emergencypreparedness data were regularly collected (including stocks, MoUs and HR capacity). A new Acute Watery Diarrhea (AWD)Preparedness Plan was drafted for Kachin in collaboration with the Health Department/Cluster.

RAKHINE

Number of people adopting basic personal and community hygiene practices

Number of people with equitable and continuous access to sufficient quantity of safe drinking and domestic water

Number of people with equitable access to safe and continuous sanitation facilities

WATER, SANITATION & HYGIENE

75K

87K

87K

10K

11K

11K

250K

258K

258K

69K

87K

87K

9K

11K

11K

186K

258K

258K

45K

87K

87K

11K

11K

11K

139K

258K

258K

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHED

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHED

TARGET

IN NEED

REACHEDGAP

87% 90% 97%

79% 84% 72%

52% 98% 54%

2017 HRP End-of-year Monitoring Results: Sex and Age Disaggregated Data

Cluster Contact Indicator No. Indicators State/Region In Need Target Reached

(Jan-Dec 2017) Male Female Children (<18 yrs)

Adult (18-59 yrs)

Elderly (>59 yrs) Gap

Kachin 19,772 11,178 9,305 4,583 4,722 9,305 1,873 Shan 3,200 1,280 2,293 1,110 1,183 2,293 (1,013)Rakhine 58,911 39,262 34,832 18,809 16,023 34,832 4,430 Kachin 19,772 9,926 1,252 583 669 1,252 8,674 Shan 3,200 1,472 2,255 1,018 1,237 2,255 (783)Rakhine 35,181 14,307 5,136 2,528 2,608 5,136 9,171 Kachin 19,772 6,858 3,091 1,515 1,576 3,091 3,767 Shan 3,200 896 424 78 346 424 - - 472 Rakhine 76,354 27,034 25,636 14,100 11,536 25,636 1,398 Kachin 88,600 83,775 76,075 35,466 40,609 7,700 Shan 18,738 16,000 14,218 6,682 7,536 1,782 Rakhine 210,353 182,000 182,000 - Kachin 80% 80% 76% 76% 0 Shan 80% 80% - 1 Rakhine 80% 80% - 1 Kachin 40,132 39,227 7,312 3,276 4,036 31,915 Shan - Rakhine 110,294 76,678 76,678 - Kachin 17,380 9,830 907 422 485 8,923 ShanRakhineKachin 86,900 86,900 27,882 12,534 15,348 12,262 12,596 3,024 59,018 Shan 10,738 10,738 12,374 3,791 8,583 4,413 3,862 4,099 (1,636)Rakhine 376,590 376,590 362,998 177,143 185,855 185,534 163,619 13,845 13,592 Rakhine 15,655 15,655 8,887 3,275 5,612 8,887 6,768

Rakhine 4,500 4,500 4,514 1,671 2,843 4,514 (14)

Rakhine 61,191 31,606 7,695 3,378 4,317 7,695 23,911

Cure rate N/A 75% 93.5% 92.4% 94.2% 93.5%Death rate N/A 10% 3.7% 6.3% 2.2% 3.7%Defaulter rate N/A 15% 2.3% 1.3% 2.9% 2.3%Cure rate N/A 75% 79.5% 81.4% 78.4% 79.5%Death rate N/A 10% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6%Defaulter rate N/A 15% 11.5% 10.4% 12.2% 11.5%Cure rate N/A 75% 83.6% NA NA 83.6%Death rate N/A 3% 0.05% NA NA 0.1%Defaulter rate N/A 15% 13.2% NA NA 13.2%Kachin 3,317 3,317 2,736 2,736 2,736 581 Shan 692 692 - 692 Rakhine 37,780 21,106 10,968 10,968 10,968 10,138 Kachin 88,613 88,613 45,503 21,841 23,662 21,386 20,931 3,186 43,110 Shan 10,801 10,801 5,746 2,758 2,988 2,930 2,471 345 5,055 Rakhine 144,838 144,838 77,213 37,834 39,379 40,923 33,202 3,088 67,625

13

CONTACT: Jane Strachan (jstrachan@unicef.org)

CONTACT: Win Bo (bow@who.int)

CONTACT: Andrea Berloffa (andrea.berloffa@fao.org), Masae

Shimomura (masae.shimomura@wfp.org)

FOOD SECURITY

NUTRITION CONTACT: Anne Laevens (alaevens@unicef.org)

NUTRITION CONTACT: Anne Laevens (alaevens@unicef.org)

12

7

8

9

EDUCATION

HEALTH

Number of pregnant and lactating women who receive messages on infant and young child feeding

1

2 Number of targeted adolescents continuously accessing post-primary learning opportunities

3 Number of targeted children learning in classes taught by education personnel trained in EiE, including life-skills and other child protection components

Number of targeted children continuously accessing pre-primary/primary education aligned with formal curricula

Number of people who received food and/or cash assistance.

Percentage of households with an adequate Food Consumption Score (FCS>35)

Number of people/household who received agriculture support, contributing to household food security

Number of people/household who received non-agricultural livelihood support to supplement their family incomeNumber of affected population utilizing primary health care services

Number of children aged 6-59 months with severe acute malnutrition admitted to therapeutic care

4

5

6

SAM children 6-59 months (Stabilization center)

SAM children 6-59 months (Outpatient programme)

MAM children 6-59 months (Supplementary feeding programme)

10 Number of children aged 60-119 months with severe acute malnutrition admitted to therapeutic care

11 Number of children aged 6-59 months with moderate acute malnutrition admitted to therapeutic care

PROTECTION CONTACT: Geraldine Salducci Petruccelli (salducci@unhcr.org)

14 Number of people in need with access to minimum available protection services

2/28/2018, 11:44 AM

2017 HRP End-of-year Monitoring Results: Sex and Age Disaggregated Data

Cluster Contact Indicator No. Indicators State/Region In Need Target Reached

(Jan-Dec 2017) Male Female Children (<18 yrs)

Adult (18-59 yrs)

Elderly (>59 yrs) Gap

Kachin 62,028 62,028 17,883 8,405 9,478 12,697 4,471 715 44,145 Shan 7,560 7,560 1,973 1,006 967 1,401 493 79 5,587 Rakhine 101,386 101,386 58,216 29,690 28,526 41,333 15,718 1,165 43,170 Kachin 23,926 23,926 6,826 6,826 1,502 5,324 17,100 Shan 2,700 2,700 948 948 171 777 1,752 Rakhine 39,106 39,106 14,179 14,179 2,410 11,769 24,927 Kachin 86,900 80,021 74,759 33,642 41,117 29,903 37,380 7,476 5,262 Shan 10,738 9,136 6,722 3,025 3,697 2,689 3,361 672 2,414 Rakhine 119,876 113,644 106,286 51,017 55,269 53,143 48,892 4,251 7,358 Kachin 86,900 80,021 81,425 39,084 42,341 38,270 37,456 5,699 (1,404)Shan 10,738 9,136 6,218 2,985 3,233 3,171 2,674 373 2,918 Rakhine 119,876 106,289 128,420 61,642 66,778 64,270 59,013 5,137 (22,131)Kachin 86,900 86,900 75,377 33,919 41,458 26,382 30,151 18,844 11,523 Shan 10,738 10,738 9,703 4,366 5,337 3,396 3,881 2,426 1,035 Rakhine 258,376 258,376 249,812 112,416 137,396 87,434 99,925 62,453 8,564 Kachin 86,900 86,900 68,900 31,006 37,894 24,115 27,560 17,225 18,000 Shan 10,738 10,738 8,973 4,038 4,935 3,141 3,589 2,243 1,765 Rakhine 258,376 258,376 186,049 83,722 102,327 65,117 74,420 46,512 72,327 Kachin 86,900 86,900 45,195 20,338 24,857 15,818 18,078 11,299 41,705 Shan 10,738 10,738 10,503 4,726 5,777 3,676 4,201 2,626 235 Rakhine 258,376 258,376 139,280 62,675 76,605 48,748 55,712 34,820 119,096

16 Number of people in need with access to minimum available protection services (Gender-Based Violence)

15 Number of people in need with access to minimum available protection services (Child Protection)

17 Number of IDPs with access to temporary shelter in accordance with minimum standards

18 Number of IDPs in camp/camp-like settings that have equitable access to basic services

19

20

21

Number of people with equitable and continuous access to sufficient quantity of safe drinking and domestic water

Number of people with equitable access to safe and continuous sanitation facilities

Number of people adopting basic personal and community hygiene practices

WATER, SANITATION & HYGIENE

SHELTER/ NON-FOOD ITEMS/ CAMP

COORDINATION AND CAMP MANAGEMENT

CONTACT: Geraldine Salducci Petruccelli (salducci@unhcr.org)

CONTACT: Sunny Guidotti (sguidotti@unicef.org)

2/28/2018, 11:44 AM