Huddled&Masses&Yearning&to& Breathe&Free&&pono.ucsd.edu/~adam/presentations/0910princeton.pdf ·...
Transcript of Huddled&Masses&Yearning&to& Breathe&Free&&pono.ucsd.edu/~adam/presentations/0910princeton.pdf ·...
-
Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free Unresolved Brown Dwarf Binaries Iden:fied with Low Resolu:on Near-‐Infrared Spectroscopy
Adam J. Burgasser UC San Diego/MIT
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
WHAT IS THE BROWN DWARF MULTIPLICITY
FRACTION IN THE FIELD?
10%?
20%?
50%?
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
Bate et al. (2009): 5-‐20% Lada (2006): 5-‐15%
Thies & Kroupa (2007): 5-‐15% © 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
Bate et al. (2009): 5-‐20% Lada (2006): 5-‐15%
Thies & Kroupa (2007): 5-‐15%
“BD binary frac:ons are low” But are they?
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
Pinfield et al. (2003): 40-‐61%
Lodieu et al. (2007): 28-‐44%
Maxted & Jeffries (2005): 32-‐45%
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
hcp://www.vlmbinaries.org © 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
hcp://www.vlmbinaries.org 10-2 100 102 104
Projected Separation (AU)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Num
ber
of S
ourc
es
VLM Binaries Archive 93 sources ~4 AU
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
hcp://www.vlmbinaries.org 10-2 100 102 104 106
Angular Separation (marcs)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Num
ber
of S
ourc
es
VLM Binaries Archive 90 sources
50 mas
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
hcp://www.vlmbinaries.org 10-2 100 102 104 106
Angular Separation (marcs)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Num
ber
of S
ourc
es
VLM Binaries Archive 90 sources
50 mas
How many sources live
here?
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
Standard Ways to Find Tight BD Binaries
• Radial velocity variables (e.g., Joergens 2006,2008; Basri & Reiners 2006; Blake et al. 2008) Pros: samples :ght physical separa:ons (
-
Spectral Binaries
Silvestri et al. (2006) WD-‐dM unresolved pair
Combined light spectra of dis:nct but comparably bright components
Pros: independent of angular & projected separa:on, can be done with low-‐resolu:on data (cheap), can characterize components
Cons: rare, no separa:on info, complex selec:on effects
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
Spectral Binaries
Silvestri et al. (2006) WD-‐dM unresolved pair
Combined light spectra of dis:nct but comparably bright components
Pros: independent of angular & projected separa:on, can be done with low-‐resolu:on data (cheap), can characterize components
Cons: rare, no separa:on info, complex selec:on effects
Spectral binaries are easily iden:fiable at the
L dwarf/T dwarf transi:on
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
The L dwarf/ T dwarf Transi:on*
*Spectral types L7-‐T5 1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (!m)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Nor
mal
ized
F
L7
L8
L9
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
ΔTeff ≈ 200-‐400 K ΔLbol ≈ 0.3 dex
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
The J-‐band bump
J-‐Ks color
MJ
Burrows et al. (2006) See also Dahn et al. (1999); Ackerman & Marley (2001); Marley et al. (2002); Tinney et al. (2003); Tsuji (2003,2005); Saumon & Marley (2008) © 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
Looper et al. (2008); Burgasser et al. (2006) See also Gizis et al. (2003); Cruz et al. (2004); Liu et al. (2006); Burgasser (2007,2008)
Primary Secondary
Combined Light Data
J
H
Ks
The J-‐band bump
Detected in resolved coeval binaries as well
2M 1404-‐3159 SD 0423-‐0414
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
Exploi:ng the L/T Transi:on “J-‐band” bump Deep minimum in LF
An enhanced binary frac:on of equal-‐
brightness components at the L/T transi:on
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
0518-2828
0825+2115 L7.5 (L7.0)
2331-4718 T5.0 (T5.0)
"2 = 58.9
2M 0518-‐2828 Archetype L/T Spectral Binary
Cruz et al. (2004); Burgasser et al. (2006)
Resolved (barely) with HST/NICMOS (50 mas ≈ 1.8 AU)
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
2M 0320-‐0446 An M/T Spectral/Spectroscopic Binary
Burgasser et al. (2008); Blake et al. (2008)
Spectroscopic binary with 0.67 yr period
(ΔV = ±7 km/s; M1 ≈ 0.08 M, M2 ≈ 0.05 M
ΔK = 4.3 mag
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
A Search for Unresolved L/T Binaries
• Full sample of 253 SpeX prism spectra for 233 L3-‐T8 dwarfs from SpeX Prism Spectral Libraries*
• Index selec:on of binary candidates • Template library of 170 spectra (reject low g, subdwarfs, low S/N, known & candidate binaries)
• Construct 13,581 unique binary combina:ons • Compare single and binary templates to candidates and assess sta:s:cal significance of “becer fit”
* hcp://www.browndwarfs.org/spexprism © 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
Derived NIR Spectral Type
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
H2O
-J/H
2O
-H2252-1730 0423-0414
0423-0414
0518-2828
1404-3159
1021-0304
1534+1615
L0 L2 L4 L6 L8 T0 T2 T4 T6 T8
Index Selec:on
=> 20 candidates iden:fied (12 “strong” + 8 “weak”)
x6
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2N
orm
aliz
ed F
!0247-1631
1520+3546 T0.0 (L7.5)
0050-3322 T7.0 (T6.5)
"2 = 1.99
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
0351+4810
0103+1935 L6.0 (L6.0)
0602+4043 T4.5 (T4.5)
"2 = 6.64
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
1039+3256
1043+1213 L7.0 (L8.0)
2254+3123 T4.0 (T4.0)
"2 = 2.56
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
1106+2754
1520+3546 T0.0 (L7.5)
0000+2554 T4.5 (T4.5)
"2 = 5.18
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
No
rmal
ized
F!
1324+6358
1043+2225 L8.0 (L9.0)
1214+6316 T3.5 (T4.0)
"2 = 6.17
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
No
rmal
ized
F!
1415+5724
1523+3014 L8.0 (L7.5)
0741+2351 T5.0 (T5.5)
"2 = 1.73
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
No
rmal
ized
F!
1435+1129
1043+1213 L7.0 (L8.0)
1615+1340 T6.0 (T6.0)
"2 = 19.9
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
No
rmal
ized
F!
1439+3042
0151+1244 T1.0 (T0.0)
2356-1553 T5.5 (T5.5)
"2 = 4.85
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
1516+0259
0318-3421 L7.0 (L6.5)
1048+0919 T2.5 (T2.5)
"2 = 1.97
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
1711+2232
0624-4521 L5.0 (L5.0)
1828-4849 T5.5 (T5.5)
"2 = 1.49
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
2139+0220
0830+4828 L9.0 (L9.5)
1214+6316 T3.5 (T4.0)
"2 = 1.83
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
0119+2403
0858+3256 T1.0 (T0.0)
2254+3123 T4.0 (T4.0)
"2 = 15.7
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
0909+6525
1750+4222 T2.0 (T1.5)
1048+0919 T2.5 (T2.5)
"2 = 2.53
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
0949-1545
1632+4150 T1.0 (T1.0)
1122-3512 T2.0 (T2.0)
"2 = 13.7
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
1207+0244
1036-3441 L6.0 (L6.5)
1209-1004 T3.0 (T3.0)
"2 = 6.14
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
2052-1609
1155+0559 L7.5 (L7.0)
1122-3512 T2.0 (T2.0)
"2 = 2.59
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2N
orm
aliz
ed F
!0247-1631
1520+3546 T0.0 (L7.5)
0050-3322 T7.0 (T6.5)
"2 = 1.99
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
0351+4810
0103+1935 L6.0 (L6.0)
0602+4043 T4.5 (T4.5)
"2 = 6.64
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
1039+3256
1043+1213 L7.0 (L8.0)
2254+3123 T4.0 (T4.0)
"2 = 2.56
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
1106+2754
1520+3546 T0.0 (L7.5)
0000+2554 T4.5 (T4.5)
"2 = 5.18
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
No
rmal
ized
F!
1324+6358
1043+2225 L8.0 (L9.0)
1214+6316 T3.5 (T4.0)
"2 = 6.17
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
No
rmal
ized
F!
1415+5724
1523+3014 L8.0 (L7.5)
0741+2351 T5.0 (T5.5)
"2 = 1.73
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
No
rmal
ized
F!
1435+1129
1043+1213 L7.0 (L8.0)
1615+1340 T6.0 (T6.0)
"2 = 19.9
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
No
rmal
ized
F!
1439+3042
0151+1244 T1.0 (T0.0)
2356-1553 T5.5 (T5.5)
"2 = 4.85
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
1516+0259
0318-3421 L7.0 (L6.5)
1048+0919 T2.5 (T2.5)
"2 = 1.97
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
1711+2232
0624-4521 L5.0 (L5.0)
1828-4849 T5.5 (T5.5)
"2 = 1.49
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
2139+0220
0830+4828 L9.0 (L9.5)
1214+6316 T3.5 (T4.0)
"2 = 1.83
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
0119+2403
0858+3256 T1.0 (T0.0)
2254+3123 T4.0 (T4.0)
"2 = 15.7
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
0909+6525
1750+4222 T2.0 (T1.5)
1048+0919 T2.5 (T2.5)
"2 = 2.53
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
0949-1545
1632+4150 T1.0 (T1.0)
1122-3512 T2.0 (T2.0)
"2 = 13.7
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
1207+0244
1036-3441 L6.0 (L6.5)
1209-1004 T3.0 (T3.0)
"2 = 6.14
1.0 1.5 2.0Wavelength (µm)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Norm
aliz
ed F
!
2052-1609
1155+0559 L7.5 (L7.0)
1122-3512 T2.0 (T2.0)
"2 = 2.59
We iden:fied 17/20 sources as probable binaries (index selec:on, becer fit to binary templates) – more than 2x known sample
3 are unresolved with HST/AO (Looper et al. 2008; Gelino et al. in prep)
2 have been subsequently resolved with AO (Gelino et al. in prep.)
12 are unobserved at high resolu:on
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
Spectral Type
0
20
40
60
80
Fra
ctio
n o
f B
ina
rie
s
L8 L9 T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
0/12 (21) 1/9 (13) 6/9 (14) 6/10 (15) 8/17 (20) 3/7 (13) 1/10 (20)
eb = 15%
What about the binary frac:on?
53±7%
eb ≥ 15+3-‐1 %
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
Conclusions
• Spectral binaries comprised of L dwarf/T dwarf pairs can measure the intrinsic BD binary frac:on
– Indep. of physical separa:on (:ght pairs; e.g. 2m0320)
– Indep. of angular separa:on (distant pairs, large samples)
– Can be done cheap and fast with low-‐res spectral data
• We have uncovered 17 (+3) probable binaries; a few confirmed, most awai:ng follow-‐up
• The BD binary frac:on is ≥15% independent of separa:on distribu:on
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser
-
Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free Unresolved Brown Dwarf Binaries Iden:fied with Low Resolu:on Near-‐Infrared Spectroscopy
Adam J. Burgasser UC San Diego/MIT
© 2009 Adam J. Burgasser