Document

Ne N clear PlantNew Nuclear Plant

Configuration Management and Information Interoperability

Russell AdamsNuclear Development

© 2009 Dominion

Nuclear Development

The Who

© 2009 Dominion 2

The Vision

New plants will be designed differently than in theNew plants will be designed differently than in the past. Virtual Plant software will be used extensively.As a result, these plants will be delivered with Virtual Plant models that are comprehensive, detailed and integrated with plant designdetailed and integrated with plant design, operations and maintenance databases and documents/records.

© 2009 Dominion 3

The Must

Nuclear Design RequirementsDesignBasis

Nuclear Configuration Management

Design Requirements“What needs to be there”

g

PlantDocs

PhysicalPlant

Facility Configuration Information

PhysicalConfiguration“What is

Conform

Work Processes must assure that:El t f ll th ti

“What we say is there”

What is actually there”

© 2009 Dominion 4

Elements conform all the timeAll changes are authorizedConformance can be verified

On October 9 1996 the Nuclear Regulatory

The Case

On October 9, 1996 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a letter to every Nuclear Utility in the United States entitled,

"Request For Information Pursuant To 10 CFR 50 54 ( F ) R di Ad A d A il bilit Of50.54 ( F ) Regarding Adequacy And Availability Of Design Bases Information“

CFR = Code of Federal Regulations = The Law

© 2009 Dominion 5

• Description of engineering design and configuration control

The Request

• Description of engineering design and configuration control processes• Rationale for concluding that design bases requirements are translated into operating maintenance and testingtranslated into operating, maintenance, and testing procedures• Rationale for concluding that system, structure, and component configuration and performance are consistentcomponent configuration and performance are consistent with the design bases• Processes for identification of problems and implementation

f ti tiof corrective actions• The overall effectiveness of current processes and programs in concluding that the configuration of your plant(s) is

i t t ith th d i b

© 2009 Dominion 6

consistent with the design bases

The Why

Nuclear Design RequirementsDesignBasis


Design Requirements “What needs to be there”

gPre-1997

Millstone Nuclear PlantInaccurate or Missing

PlantDocs

PhysicalPlant

Conform

Facility Configuration Information

PhysicalConfiguration “What is

Work Processes must assure that:El t f ll th ti

“What we say is there”

What is actually there”

Work Processes did not assure that:

© 2009 Dominion 7

Elements conform all the timeAll changes are authorizedConformance can be verified

Millstone Nuclear Plant

The Impact

• Unit 1 shut down permanently• Unit 2 and 3 were shut down over two and a half years• Billions of dollars in lost revenues and recovery costsIndustry

DC C k N l Pl t h td f t• DC Cook Nuclear Plants shutdown for over two years• Clinton Nuclear Plant shutdown for over two years• Dominion response to the NRC Letter cost an estimated $50-Dominion response to the NRC Letter cost an estimated $50

millionThe Good News

© 2009 Dominion 8

• Configuration Management improved in the industry

The Challenge

Knowledge WorkersNuclear Knowledge WorkersEDB


Paper-based Quality Assurance

g

Conform PDAS

PlantDocumentation

Automation Systems Challenge

Process

Lots of Tribal Knowledge , Semi-Connected and Disconnected Systems, M l P d P

© 2009 Dominion 9

Manual Processes and yes…… Paper

The Truth

© 2009 Dominion 10

The Food-For-Thought“If you always do what you have always done, you y y y y , ywill always be where you have always been”

unknown

“We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of“We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them”

Albert Einstein

“Think outside the Paper” Russell Adams

“Oth Pl t h th k i“Other Players go to where the puck is

Wayne Gretzky I go where the puck is going to be”

© 2009 Dominion 11

y y

The NeedA modern automated, integrated and interoperableA modern automated, integrated and interoperable Configuration Management Program must be established to

Maintain consistenc bet een the design• Maintain consistency between the design requirements, physical configuration and facility configuration information

• Ensure the ability to document and maintain compliance with the license basis

Needs to be significantly different thanNeeds to be significantly different than Configuration Management programs currently used by operating plants

© 2009 Dominion 12

The Action

Industry Initiative :Industry Initiative :Achieving New Nuclear Virtual Plant Configuration Managementg• Standard Configuration Management Reference

Model and Implementing Guideline• New Nuclear Plant Information Handover Guide• New Nuclear Plant XML Equipment Schemas

© 2009 Dominion 13

Achieving New Nuclear Virtual Plant Configuration

The Journey to where the puck is going to be

Achieving New Nuclear Virtual Plant Configuration ManagementEPRI Advanced Nuclear Technology Programgy g• Technical Advisory Groups

• Owner OperatorsR V d• Reactor Vendors

• EPC Companies• Technology Developers• Industry Consortium• Government

EPRI/FIATECH/NIST Partnerships

© 2009 Dominion 14

• EPRI/FIATECH/NIST Partnerships

Thank You

Russell AdamsN l D l tNuclear DevelopmentDominion804 273 [email protected]

© 2009 Dominion 15

Advanced Nuclear Technology (ANT) ProgramTechnology (ANT) Program

Achieving New Nuclear Virtual Plant Configuration Management

Ken BarrySenior Project Manager

EPRI Portfolio Spans the Entire Electricity Sector

Nuclear Power EnvironmentPower Delivery & Utilization

Generation

Material Degradation/Aging

Fuel Reliability

Air Quality

Global Climate Change

Distribution

Energy Utilization

Advanced Coal Plants, Carbon Capture and Storage Fuel Reliability

High-Level Waste and Spent Fuel Management

Nondestructive Evaluation and Material Characterization

Global Climate Change

Land and Groundwater

Occupational Health and Safety

T&D Environmental Issues

Energy Utilization

Grid Operations and Planning

Substations and Asset Planning

Transmission and Increased

Combustion Turbines

Environmental Controls

Generation Planning

Major Component ReliabilityEquipment Reliability

Instrumentation and Control

Risk and Safety Management

T&D Environmental Issues

Water and Ecosystems

Transmission and Increased Power Flow

Major Component Reliability

Operations and Maintenance

Renewables

Management

Advanced Nuclear Technology (ANT)

Low-Level Waste and Radiation Management

17© 2008 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Advanced Nuclear Technology (ANT) Program Objectivesj

• New nuclear power plants must overcome a number of regulatory economic technical and social barriersof regulatory, economic, technical, and social barriers prior to becoming a reality

• Program efforts focused around:

– Facilitating standardization across the new fleet– Transferring technology to new plant designs– Ensuring top plant performance from start of operations– Reduce overall deployment risk and uncertaintyReduce overall deployment risk and uncertainty


EPRI’s ANT Program…Leveraging the Industry


U.S. Nuclear Plants Sustaining ~90% Capacity Factor91% Average Capacity Factor for 2007

Coal

Wind / Solar


What is the Problem?

• Theorem 1 – 50% of the problems in the world result from people using the same words with different meaningspeople using the same words with different meanings

• Theorem 2 – The other 50% of the problems result from people using different words with the same meaningp p g g


Stan Kaplan, Risk Analysis, Vol 17, 1997

Project Goal

• Develop a roadmap for New Nuclear Build data handover and configuration management

• Develop a common data language and interoperabilitystandard that will be used by the nuclear plant sub-tierstandard that will be used by the nuclear plant sub tier suppliers through the suppliers through the EPC and reactor vendors and finally through to the owner and operatoroperator


Why? – The Numbers

• The National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) study Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability(NIST) study, Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry identified and quantified the efficiency losses in the U.S. capital facilities i d ib bl i d i biliindustry attributable to inadequate interoperability.

• The researchers very conservatively estimated those U.S. losses to be $15.8 billion in 2002 - two-thirds borne bylosses to be $15.8 billion in 2002 two thirds borne by owners and operators.


Why? – Pre-startup

•Information management throughout the asset lifecycle is a key means to increasing the return on assets in modernkey means to increasing the return on assets in modern process plants. Better information management can benefit new plants by:

– Providing contractual definition of information deliverables for a planned plant

– Reducing the substantial costs of collating handover data against the installed asset baseR d i t it t b b i i– Reducing opportunity costs by bringing a new plant up to full operating capacity faster


Why? – Post-startup

• And can also benefit existing plants by:– Increasing plant productivity towards the

inherent asset maximumsFi di ffi i i i i t d– Finding new efficiencies in maintenance and operationsStreamlining the supply chain– Streamlining the supply chain


What is EPRI’s Role?

• Provide and assemble the industry expertise to achieve new nuclear virtual plant configuration managementnew nuclear virtual plant configuration management– Provide the driving force to establish the

nuclear industry standardsnuclear industry standards– Work with other organizations (i.e. FIATECH

and NIST) to capture, leverage and adaptand NIST) to capture, leverage and adapt existing expertise and standards

– Monitor adoption and provide support as p p ppneeded


EPRI Actions in Progress

•Standard Configuration Management Reference Model and Implementing Guideline (2009 -2010)Ed ti f i d t t t th h•Education of industry to ensure support through some difficult times

N l I d t D t H d G id– Nuclear Industry Data Handover Guide (2009)

Establish n clear XML schemas for critical•Establish nuclear XML schemas for critical components (FIATECH AEX) (2009 – ongoing)


The Journey to Data Interoperability

Join Us!28© 2008 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Join Us!

®®

“Closing the Loop” on the Lifecycle of Nuclear Plant Data

Berry GibsonyIBM

© 2008 IBM Corporation

IBM Software Group – Collaborative Solutions for the Plant Lifecycle

K l d ld b il dA i f i dS li ld l l h dT h i i ld kTh d i li ldKnowledge could be easily captured and replicated across different plants in the fleet… so that best practices became standard?

Asset information and processes were rigorously controlled according to best practices… so that licensing, siting and regulatory audits were a breeze?

Suppliers could seamlessly hand over asset information to owners… and reduce plant start-up time and cost?

Technicians could access work instructions containing rich 3D data and process information… to guarantee the right work is performed correctly?

Outage projects and complex maintenance tasks could be simulated and optimized for time and safety… prior to expensive capital commitments?

The owner and its suppliers could collaborate using a single authoritative source of plant definition… and design and construct the most efficiently

t d d i t i d l tto expensive capital commitments?operated and maintained plant… together?


IBM/DS PLM Strategy : PLM 2.0, “PLM Online for All”

3D Lifelike Experience4

CollaborativeInnovation

RealisticSimulation

Lifelike Experience3

PLM 2 03Product Lifecycle M t

2

PLM 1.0

• All Users• Users’

Interactions• Generate IP

Experience in 3D

PLM 2.0Management

Digital Mock-Up

1

3D

• Experience in 3D• Online Harnessing

Collective Intelligence

2D to 3D

1994 2000 2005 20111981


IBM/DS PLM Strategy : How Will Nuclear Catch Up?gy

3D Lifelike Experience4

Where Will Nuclear of the Future Be?Collaborative

InnovationRealistic

SimulationLifelike

Experience3

2

Today’s NuclearStuck with 70’s

PracticesPLM 1.0

3D

•All Users•Users’ Interactions•Generate IP•Experience in 3D•Online

PLM 2.03Product Lifecycle Management

Digital Mock‐Up

2D to 3D

1

1970 2016+2D 1994 2000 2005 20111981


PLM Vision for New Nuclear

Full lifecycle virtual plant data

Data tool and processData, tool and process interoperability

Data traceability

PLM PrinciplesWork products should be produced on demand ALL plant information accessible through a common data model (i e data centric object model)ALL plant information accessible through a common data model (i.e., data-centric object model)– Requirements and their evolution– Design decisions and their rationale– Changes and their justification

P j t d t t d t– Project and contract data– Maintenance information through decommissioning– etcUse off-the-shelf technologies to provide data organization and visualization


Learning from other IndustriesgChallenges are principally the same– Key design challenges shared by other industries, such as Aerospace / Shipbuilding / Offshore

Platforms– Complex capital projects large number of parts highly regulated global collaborative effort / manyComplex capital projects, large number of parts, highly regulated, global collaborative effort / many

participants, reuse of data, IP capturing

34


As-Is Challenge in Nuclearg

DesignRequirements

What is required to be there

The Physical

ConfigurationInformation

Manual ProcessesLots of Paper

Disconnected Systems

The Physical Configuration

What is thereWhat we say

is thereMust Conform*Ref INPO AP-929


“Opportunities” With the As-Ispp

Existing plants defined in 2D on drawings and in documents across systems that are not generally integrated

Little industry experience with modern 3D design, SOA, data integration, etc.

Data interoperability is painful to non-existent

Information “handover” is not seamlessInformation handover is not seamless

Owner/Operators don’t get what they need from EPCs because of economics, contracts, experience, etc.

Supply chains are much more complex and global than they were 30 years agoSupply chains are much more complex and global than they were 30 years ago.

High costs incurred to reduce configuration management risks– Maintaining design basis documents– Ensuring the physical plant matches design requirements and plant documentationEnsuring the physical plant matches design requirements and plant documentation– Keeping operating procedures up to date and in synch with design basis– Streamlining integration of maintenance and engineering data to support maintenance– Possibility of long-term plant shutdowns due to information inconsistencies– Performing V&V activity on the correct plant configuration

Ref. SCE


Typical Project Execution “System” Todayyp j y y

Preferred Parts

SupplierSupplierSupplierSupplier

Risk-Share PartnerRisk-Share Partner

ContractorContractor

E-mail

Preferred PartsApproved Vendors ContractorContractorSubcontractorSubcontractor Constructability Reviews

Build PlanWork PackagesTag and Master Index

MTOsBoMsTag Data

RequirementsDesign Feedback

S k N t

ConstructionConstruction

ServiceService

ProcurementProcurement

EngineeringEngineering

Tech PubsField Notices

As-Maintained BOMgChanges

ModelsDrawingsSchematics

SneakerNet

DesignDesign

Business Development

Business Development

Program Management

Program Management

Requirements

Customer ConcernsCorrective ActionWork Instructions

FTPCourier

GovernmentGovernment

O/OO/ORisk-Share PartnerRisk-Share Partner

Design SubcontractorDesign Subcontractor

Concepts

Requirements WBSSOW

ScheduleCost

RegulatorRegulatorSupplierSupplierp

Market RequirementsBrochuresData Sheets

RiskEV


Typical Current Plant Information EnvironmentIncludes a number of offline applications and data sources

Engineering Platform Business UnitMarketing & Sales

requirements

Costing (Guess Work)

Engineer

FMEA Supplemental PCR

PACOther data

Smartplant

Includes a number of offline applications and data sources

EMRDVR

DVR(PrototypeRelease)

Concept Sheet Development

Information Search

Report

Engineer

DVP&RBase PCRAssumption

Requirement

Certification Process

p

Cost Analyst

Test

CAE Outsourcing

Cost Report

Supplier

Search

Supplier

M d lCost Analyst

Designer Designer

15 Panel chart 9 Panel chart Report

Report

Cost BOM(AS 400)

Program Team

Report

Program

PurchasingEngineering Operations

ConstructionProduction BOM

Storage

Report

Report

3D Drawings 2D DrawingsModel

Process Coordinator

Program Engineer PRTM2D CAD

Visualization

(AS 400)

Program master BOM

Routing file

MetricsTracking Maintenance

file

Coordinator

Program Manager

Cost CubeAME EngineerProcess

Coordinator2D CAD Visualization

Inventory Management

Report

JBA(Prototype

Engineering)

Supplier

Routing filePac Report

file

MSP ReportInformation Search

Logistics Management Supplier

JBA(Engineering)

JBA(Manufacturing)

SAP


PLM Architecture – Example Future Plant Information Environment

System ModelPortal

3D Dashboard

Portal

Enterprise Service Bus

Enterprise PLM

System Model

Enterprise Service Bus(SOA) ISO 15926

Req.Mgmt

DOORS

EAMMaximo Primavera

Scheduling

ISO 15926

Process Sim

DMIntergraph

DM

DMBentley

DM

ERPDMAveva

DMCAE Distributed

PDM Point Solutions

DMCatia


PLM Architecture – Supports the Nuclear Plant Lifecycle VIRTUAL

CONSTRUCTIONVIRTUAL

CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT LIFECYCLEPROJECT LIFECYCLEPROJECT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT

PROJECT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT

Enterprise PLM

System Model

REALREAL--TIMETIMEOPERATIONSOPERATIONSREALREAL--TIMETIME

OPERATIONSOPERATIONSSIMULATIONSIMULATION

PLANTPLANTPLANTDATA AUTHORING

PLANTDATA AUTHORING

MAINTENANCE,MAINTENANCE,MAINTENANCE,MAINTENANCE,

Customer Requirements Customer Requirements SpecificationSpecification

Customer Customer RequirementsRequirements





Captured as Captured as Captured as Captured as

MAINTENANCE,MAINTENANCE,SAFETY, TESTINGSAFETY, TESTINGMAINTENANCE,MAINTENANCE,

SAFETY, TESTINGSAFETY, TESTINGREQUIREMENTS

ANALYSISREQUIREMENTS

ANALYSISRequirementRequirement

ChapterChapter

CommentComment

SpecificationSpecification

RequirementRequirement

ChapterChapter

CommentComment


RequirementRequirement

ChapterChapter

CommentComment



The Vision: An Optimized Project Execution System

Risk Share PartnerRisk Share Partner

SupplierSupplier

C t tC t tContractorContractorSuppliersSuppliers

SubcontractorsSubcontractors

The Vision: An Optimized Project Execution System

Requirements

Preferred PartsApproved Vendors

Constructability ReviewsBuild PlanWork PackagesTag and Master Index

ContractorContractorSuppliersSuppliers

MTOsBoMsTag Data

RequirementsDesign Feedback ConstructionConstruction

ServiceService

ProcurementProcurement

EngineeringEngineering

Tech PubsField Notices

As-Maintained BOMPLMPLMTag DataChanges

ModelsSchematicsDrawings

ServiceServiceEngineeringEngineering

Requirements

Customer ConcernsCorrective ActionWork Instructions

PLMPLM

Concepts CustomersCustomersDesign PartnerDesign Partner

BusinessDevelopment

BusinessDevelopment

Program Management

Program Management

Risk-SharePartnerRisk-SharePartner

O/OO/O

WBSSOW

ScheduleC tp

Market RequirementsBrochuresData Sheets

CustomersCustomersDesign PartnerDesign PartnerDesign PartnerDesign Partner GovernmentGovernment

CostRiskEV


What are some of the things you could do with an integrated data-centric PLM execution environment?

• Manage a complete integrated Bill of Material for the whole plant (piping, mechanical, electrical, electronics,

Project PlanningProject PlanningLogisticsLogistics

p (p p g, , , ,software, etc)

• Manage as-specified, as-designed, as-planned, as-built, as-maintained representations, as an evolving baseline, linked throughout the lifecycleConstruction Planning Construction Planning Material Flow SimulationMaterial Flow Simulation

• Execute projects with integrated project and plant data

• Perform maintenance activities on the right configuration with reference to model-based work instructions

Operations PlanningOperations Planning

instructions

• Perform operator and maintenance training using configuration managed virtual reality representations of the plant Maintenance Planning Maintenance Planning

• Plan, simulate and optimize construction processes using the same virtual plant model

• Re-use plant definition data across functions and processes

Human FactorsHuman Factors Work InstructionsWork Instructions

processes

• Understand project status with integrated information

1Ergonomics & SafetyErgonomics & Safety 3D Job Aids3D Job Aids


PLM Enablers for Key Configuration Management Functions

ConfigurationIdentification

ConfigurationControl

StatusAccounting

VerificationAnd Audit

CM Planning & Management

Digital Plant Ch DeliverablesCh Lif lProject

Management

Resource ManagementRole AssignmentSchedule ManagementPrimavera IntegrationRi k M t

Digital Plant Definition

Plant Breakdown Structure

Change Workflow

Collaborative Change

Problem Report (PR)Enterprise Change Request (ECR)Enterprise Change Notice (ECN)

Deliverables Management

Scheduled Delivery DatesDigital Content PackageAcceptance Criteria

Change Lifecycle Management

Metrics and Reports

Change Status

Document Management

Collaboration Mgmt

Risk ManagementAction Items

MetadataAttributes

Requirements

Document Associativity to Changes

Collaborative Change Impact Analysis

CAD dataMarkups

Modeling and Simulation

Embedded Visualization

Change MetricsBOMsParts Lists“Where Used”

Structured Document Management

CustomerSupplier

Quality Mgmt

Management

Collaborative Design Reviews and Markup

Effectivity Management

Change Classification& Prioritization

pReports

Virtual Prototyping

Visualization

Metrics and

Archival and Recovery

A dit Trail

ITAR Security and Access Control

Workflow AutomationLifecycle Management

Process Management

A D i d

CAD/CAM Models and DrawingsAnalysisTest Data

Document-to-Part Associativity

g

Change Status Monitoring

Electronic Signatures

Serial / Lot / DateMetrics and

Reports

*ANSI/EIA-649 National Consensus

Audit Trail

PDF Document Collaboration

Full text searching

Dashboard Metrics and

Reports

As-DesignedAs-BuiltAs-MaintainedAlternates & SubstitutesBOM-Compare Tools

Test DataEtc.

ConfigurationBaselining

Electronic Signatures Standard for Configuration ManagementInternet-Based

Architecture


XCEL Energy – Monticello GEZIP Projectgy j

?=

GEZIP = General Electric Zinc Injection Module


Entergy - Waterford 3 Steam Gen Removal gy

?=


IBM Center of Excellence for Nuclear Power

La Gaude, FranceAustin, Texas

MISSION CLIENTS

Th N l P E t

SOLUTIONS

Develop innovative information technology solutions and demonstrations

Define and share best practice

The Nuclear Power Ecosystem:Owners/Operators

Designers/Constructors

Nuclear Service Providers:

Nuclear regulatory/industry bodies:

Business Process Solutions:Nuclear Best practices

Business Modeling

Business TransformationDefine and share best practice business processes for nuclear power

Provide nuclear power participants with SOA tools and consulting methodologies

NRC, CEA, NEI, INPO, ASN,…

Nuclear R&D:ITER, GNEP, …

Academia

Knowledge Management

Integration Solutions:SOA Solutions

WebSphere Solutions

Application Solutions:g

Architect a robust IT infrastructure to support the deployment of strategic enterprise applications by operators and plant designers

PLM, EAM, ECM, PDM, and others

Infrastructure Solutions:HPC: Blue gene, Clusters, …

Locational Awareness, Security:RFID, video surveillance,...

IBM Software Group – Collaborative Solutions for the Plant LifecycleDetect Incident AA

G t W k O d BB

La Gaude Scenario

Repair Asset

ASAP: Asset repair

CC

Generate Work Order BBScenario Overview

Monitor Maintenance History KPIEERepair Asset

ASAP: Asset repair

CC

Work Order Update DD

Repair Asset CCKPI KO

IssueKPI OK Nothing to do for now

C t E i i I W k O dFF

Update Work Order DD

Repair Asset CC

Qualify Engineering IssueGG

Create Engineering Issue Work OrderFFMaintenanceTechnician

ENOVIA

EngineerHH IIJJ KK

LL

Enterprise Service Bus(WebSphere)

Consult Maintenance HistoryII

Analyse Impact: Decide changeJJ

Understand Plant Item ContextHHEngineering

Manager

CC

DD

GGMM

Select New Supplier / Plant ItemKK

y p g

MaximoSign Off Engineering IssueLL AAFF

Update Engineering Issue Work OrderMM Maintenance Manager

BB EE


Closing the Loop on the Lifecycle of Plant DataC os g t e oop o t e ecyc e o a t ata

“PLM” “EAM”

OperationalRecords

Management Upgrades &Revamps

ReleaseTo

ProductionService

InformationService

Maximo

Preventive

Inventory &Procurement

O&M Simulation

DesignConfigurations,

AssetConfigurationsInformation &Equipment

ServicePerformance

Analysis

ConstructionPlanning

Plan

tThe Ph

Plant

ServiceForecasting& Planning

e e t eMaintenance

PlantDesign

Configurations,Information &

Procedures

Information &Procedures

EquipmentUtilization &Performance

Analysis

ServiceVirt

ual P

hysica

Plant Requirements Plant

Optimization

WorkInstructions

ServiceOptimization

The

V l Plant

Drives Continual Plant & Service Improvement & Reduced TCO

t


As-Is Challenge in Nuclearg

DesignRequirements

What is required to be there

The Physical


Manual ProcessesLots of Paper

Disconnected Systems


What is thereWhat we say

is thereMust Conform*Ref INPO AP-929


The Technology is Here Today to Maintain Configuration Using gy y g gModern Technologies

What is required

Req.

to be there

MgmtDOORS



System ModelPlant Requirements

OperationalRecords

Management

ServiceForecasting& Planning

PreventiveMaintenance

Inventory &Procurement

Upgrades &Revamps

Plant Optimization

O&M Simulation

ReleaseTo

ProductionService

Information

PlantDesign

WorkInstructions

DesignConfigurations,Information &

Procedures

AssetConfigurationsInformation &Procedures

EquipmentUtilization &Performance

Analysis

ServiceOptimization

ServicePerformance

Analysis

ConstructionPlanning

EAMMaximo PLM

Enovia

What is there What we say yis there

Document

Documents

Transcript of Document