HSAD integrated pest management
-
Upload
icarda -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
389 -
download
3
Transcript of HSAD integrated pest management
Integrated Farm Pest ManagementDr.Nazar Alanbaky
Plant Protection office / MoA
Joint Work Shop/MoA & HSADJune 10-11-2014
On-farm integrated management of Ascochyta blight on spring planted chickpea and variety evaluation in North Iraq Location/site: Nineveh (Alqoosh); Erbil /Ainkawa
Objectives To evaluate candidate chickpea varieties for their resistance to
Ascochyta blight and Fusarium wilt; To develop integrated management for Ascochyta blight and
Fusarium wilt on spring planted chickpea To dissect the Pathogenic variability of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.
ciceri
On-farm evaluations of promising chickpea genotypes resistant to Ascochyta blight and wilt/root rot on spring planted chickpea in North Iraq
Severe Ascochyta Blight
Table 1. Agronomic traits of two chickpea genotypes tested at Alqoush during the growing season of 2012/13
Agronomic traitsGenotypes
FLIP 06-156C FLIP05-133C
Flowering dates 70 72
Days to maturity 125 128
Pant height (cm) 50 51
100 seed weight(g) 30 31.5
Yield (T/h) 1.3 1.3
Table 2: Influence of selected bio control agents & bio fertilizers on incidence of wilt on chickpea plants
Treatments Disease incidence (%)
Control efficiency(%)
Rhizobium 20 50
Trichoderma 10 75
Pseudomonas 12 70
Bacillus 10 75
PGPR (Mixed bioagents) 15 63
Control 40
On –Farm use of biofertilizer on wheat and chickpea (Location: Nineveh Alqoosh ).
Objective: Evaluation of some biofertilizers to investigate their role as a safe and effective alternative to the chemical fertilizers and as plant growth promoter, on spring chickpea.
Table 13: Effect of bio agents combination (bio fertilizer and bio pesticide) on chickpea growth and wilt disease.
Treatments
Dose
Length of plant/cm
Shoot dry weight/gm No. f pods/plantSeed weight/
gm/m^2No. nodules/
plantDry weight of nodules/mg Wilt
incidence (%)0* 1/4*
1/2*
0* 1/4* 1/2* 0* 1/4* 1/2* 0* 1/4* 1/2* 0*1/4*
1/2* 0* 1/4* 1/2*
R 42 43 37 34.33 50.08 53.83 18.88 25.70 24.82 5.11 8.17 7.82 6 10 15 95 130 186 20
T+R 30 32 33 31.66 41.4 43.00 20.29 23.52 26.47 5.88 8.67 8.23 7 11 17 157 138 192 10
P+R 35 37 38 36.25 40.00 54.58 20.58 23.70 24.52 6.47 8.94 9.11 8 15 20 159 195 235 12
PGPR 39 33 35 28.53 35.25 44.33 18.86 20.58 22.94 5.52 6.82 6.7 6 11 16 133 136 135 10
B+R 32 34 38 31.66 35.75 40.58 19.55 22.35 27.65 6.04 7.76 8.05 7 14 14 140 205 200 15
CONTROL 25 29 30 28.5 32.5 33.83 15.7 14.70 16.17 4.82 5.58 7.11 3 6 6 54 80 87 40
0* = zero amount of chemical fertilizer.1/4*= quarter of recommended amount of chemical fertilizer.1/2*= half of recommended amount of chemical fertilizer
Practical field activities
IPM on Major Date Palm Insect Pests
Objectives
Introducing at farmer’s level safe, effective and IPM compatible insecticides as alternative to conventional chemical insecticides for the control of Dubas Bug ,Lesser Date Moth (Alhumara) & Borers.
Raising ministry’s field staff and farmers’ awareness and knowledge regarding management of major date palm insect pests.
Improving date palm yield and quality.
On-farm integrated management of Dubas bug on date palm Locations/sites: Baghdad/Abu-Ghraib, Babil /Hashimia, Mahaweel,
Karbala/AinTemr
Table 3 Field efficacies of selected botanical pesticides against nymphal stage of dubas bug O. lybicus. Babil Governorate, Spring generation 2013.
Treatment
Rate of
Use/ Lit.
Governorate/site
Area/ (h)
Average Pre-
Treatment
Infestation
(Nymph/ Leaflet)
Average Post – Treatment Infestation (Nymph/ Leaflet)
In Days
Efficacy (%)
7 14 21 28
*Mixture(1:10) :Neem 1% Azadrachtin + Summer Oil
1.5 + 15 ml
Babil/ Almahaweel
3 3.51 0.09 0.12 0.39-
90
Control 3.51 2.20 4.33 3.79 -
**Oxymatrine 2.4 EC
2 mlBabil/
Alhashimia2 7.4 0.68 0.17 0.80 1.73 62
Control 7.44 2.29 18.95 13.18 4.54
*Experiment was conducted on May 13th, 2013** Experiment conducted on April 28th,
Table.4. Field efficacies of selected botanical pesticides against nymphal stages of dubas bug O. lybicus. Karbala province, Spring 2013.
Treatment
Rate of
Use/ Lit.
Area(h)
Average Pre-
Treatment Infestation
Egg/ Leaflet
Average Post – Treatment Infestation Nymph/ Leaflet In Days
7 14 21 28 35 42 49%
Efficacy
*Mixture (1:10): Neem
1% Azadrachtin + Summer
Oil
1.5 + 15 ml
3.0 4.78 4.84 1.35 7.42 1.55 0.63 2.56 5.21 79
Oxymatrine 2.4 EC
2 ml 1.0 4.78 2.46 0.68 0.27 0.81 0.56 1.49 2.8 89
Control 2.0 4.78 4.85 1.71 13.11 7.32 5.56 21.29 24.77 *Treatment conducted on March 24th, 2013
Table 5. Field efficacies of selected botanical insecticides against nymphal stages of dubas bug O. lybicus. Baghdad / Abu Ghraib Orchard no.1 (Spring 2013).
Treatment
Rate of
Use ml/Lit
Area(h)
Pre- Treatment
Nymph/Leaflet
Post - Treatment Nymph/Leaflet(Days)
% Efficacy
7 14 21 28
Oxymatrine 2.4 EC
2 2
108.37
5.66 2.78 0.16 1.0393
Neem(1% Aza)
3 1 15.10 4.18 2.88 3.9267
Mixture(1:10): Neem+ Summer Oil
1.5+ 15
1 108.37
28.58 12.41 3.42 3.44 86.5
Control 1 108.37 43.03 21.29 13.06 14.59
Table 7. Effect of Different treatments on the productivity of some date palmvarieties at selected Provinces (Spring 2013).
TreatmentDates Variety
GovernorateNo.
Bunches / Tree
Average bunch weight
Kg
Total Yield/ Kg/Tree
No. Beneficiary
Farmers
Oxymatrine 2.4 EC
Khestawy Karbella
13 13 169
4Mixture(1:10)
Neem 1% Aza + Summer Oil
13 12 156
Control 9 9 81
Oxymatrine 2.4 EC Khestawy Babil 8 30 2402
Control 9 17 153
Oxymatrine 2.4 EC
Barhee Baghdad
8 10 80
5Neem 1% + Summer Oil
8 8 64
Neem 1% 6 6 36Control 7 5 35
Oxymatrine 2.4 ECKhestawy Baghdad
14 13 182
5Neem 1% 8 10 80
Control 8 7 56
Fig. 2 .Effect of Oxymatrine, Neem and mixture of Neem and Summer Oil on the yield of selected varieties of date palm
On- farm integrated management of lesser date moth on date palm (LDM)
Description: Disseminating the use of the Bio-Control agents as one package (BT as a spray, egg parasitoids, larvae parasitoids) for the control of Lesser date moth to more farmers and areas.
Objectives:Select effective IPM options for the management of lesser date moth and dissemination to more farmers.
Table 10. Influence of IPM package on infestation of LDM in different sites
Province/Site%infestation before treatment
Treatment
Infestation/ 2wks after tmt.
Infestation/ one month after tmt.
Infest. (%)
Eff. control (%
Infest. (%)
Eff. control
(%)
Basra/Al-Nashwa
3.77Bt.+egg&larvae
parasitoid5.9
629.7
62Control 15.1 19.8
L.S.D(P < 0.05) For percent infestation ,Treatments=2.041, Dates =2.041, Interaction =2.887Karbalaa/Ain-
Tamr5.1 Bt.+egg&larvae
parasitoid6.5 69 5.29 72
Control 18.9 18.4L.S.D(P < 0.05) For percent infestation ,Treatments=2.288, Dates =2.288, Interaction =3.235
Al-Anbar/Al-Saqlawyia
4.5 Bt.+egg&larvae parasitoid
2.63 65 4.64 70
Control 7.39 15.38L.S.D(P < 0.05) For percent infestation ,Treatments=2.214, Dates =2.214, Interaction =3.131
Mayssan/ Al-Kahlaa
7.1 Bt.+egg&larvae parasitoid
5.06 61 7.5 57
Control 12.8 16.2
L.S.D(P < 0.05) For percent infestation ,Treatments=0.786, Dates =0.786, Interaction =3.235
Field Release of Egg & Larval Parasitiods
Province Treatments
Parameters
Mean no. fruits/
strands
Weight of bunch (kg.)
Yield /tree (kg.)
Percent of yield
increase (%)
Basrah Bt.+egg&larvae parasitoid
21.5 6.425 79.5
33.6control 15.7 4.736 59.58
Karbala Bt.+egg&larvae parasitoid
30.01 9.917 107.2 38.5
control 22.5 7.604 77.4
Mayssan Bt.+egg&larvae parasitoid
23.5 9.178 81.8 23.8
control 17.1 7.261 66.1
Al-Anbar Bt.+egg&larvae parasitoid
25.4 11.123 115.1
37control 18.5 7.305 84
L.S.D(P < 0.05) 6.6 1.22 20.49
Table 11.Some yield components of date palm trees treated with combination of bioagents at different Provinces during 2013.
On- farm integrated management on date palm borers
Objective• Influence of Solar Traps and agriculture practices to
reduce the number of borers in date palm fields and their impact on yield.
Training on Composting & OF
Table.13. Number of farmers benefiting or accepting the concept of IPM on date palm and area covered in different sites
Activity Province/Site Area of experiment
(H)
Area of benefiting
surrounding orchards
(H)
No. Farmers benefiting and accepting IPM technology on
date palm in the site
On-Farm IPM for dubas bug
Baghdad/Fahama 4 200 35Baghdad/Abu-Ghraib 3 14 10
Karbalaa/AinTamr 3 31 42Karbalaa/Aun 3 61 51
Babil/Hashimia 2 35 45Babil/Mahaweel 3 30 30
Total 18 371 213
On-Farm IPM for LDMAl-Anbar/Al-Saqlawyia 5 25 25
Karbalaa/Ain Tamr 5 30 18Missan/Al-Kahlaa 3 25 12Basra/Al-Nashwa 4 25 27
Total 17 105 82
On-Farm OF on date palm
Karbalaa/AinTamt 1.5 10 10Babil/Al-Mahaweel 1.5 3 6
Dewanyia/Dewanyia 1.5 15 10 Total 4.5 28 26
Grand Total 39.5 504 321
PROJECT Training Course & SITE VISITS/IPM
Table.14. Training in IndiaDuration Institute/City No.
Trainees Title of training Item
6/6 – 20/6/
2014
Centre for Agricultural Technologies, Assessment & Transfer (CATAT), Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi
5
Bio- Fertilizers and Bio-pesticides in Agriculture
1.
1/6 -/15/6/
2014
National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects, (NBAII), Bangalore, Karnataka
7
Bio-intensive integrated pest and disease management (Mass rearing/Entomology)
2.
6/6 – 20/6/
2014
Centre for Agricultural Technologies, Assessment & Transfer (CATAT), Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi
4
Bio –organic fertilization in Agriculture
3.
16 Total
HARVEST OF HSAD
ACTIVITIES
Concluding RemarksPresented Field Data have strongly indicated that Botanical Insecticides ; Neem EC
(1% Azadrachtin), Oxymatrine EC alone or in combination with Summer Oil were an effective alternative control measures against Dubas Bug . Bio agents namely ; Bt, eggs & larval parasitiods were an effective IPM package to manage Lesser Date Moth . Solar Traps was an effective tool for Monitoring & Control of major Date Palm Borers. Bio pesticides ( Trichoderma) & Bio Fertilizers ( Rhizobium,Psedomonas & Bacillus and tolerant genotype gave dual effects by reducing Ascochyta & Fusarium wilt incidence and enhance productivity of Chickpea.Noticeable Role of HSAD Project on offering Research & New Technology Materials , as well as supporting Local & International Training Program. Finally Two important Notes:
All most all HASAD IPM activities were based on the outcome of previously completed national & international Projects. Both changing of HSAD Work Plan and the Urgency to show results (Rapid Impacts) caused negative impacts on the conduct of the project.
Thanksfor listening