HP-Itanium-docs.pdf

13
From: Hurd, Mark Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 4:22 PM To: Donatelli, Dave Cc: Bradley, Todd; Robison, Shane Subject: RE: Intel K22 Update Dave, Excellent news! Mark This message and any attachments are confidential and may a/sa be legal/y privileged. 1f yau are nat the in tended recipient, please natify the sender immediately. You must nat copy this message ar use it far any purpase nar publish ordisclase its contents ta any other persan. From: Donatelli, Dave Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 5:34 PM To: Hurd, Mark; Bradley, Todd Subject: Fw: Intel K22 Update The latest From: Fink, Martin R To: Donatelli, Dave; Robison, Shane Sent: Fri Jul 16 00:01:54 2010 Subject: Intel K22 Update Dave/Shane - I had a call with Kirk Skaugen to review K22 contract progress. Not only did they not bring up the slate issue (I didn't bring it up either), they want to drive to announce this via an event that Mark and Paul already have scheduled to occur at half-moon bay on August 25th I'm not sure what exactly this means, but I have rarely seen Intel so aggressive on anything to do with Itanium EVER, and they are working very hard to get this moving forward. Martin Martin Fink Sr. Vice-President & General Manager Business Critical Systems Hewlett-Packard (970) 898-7076 marthiJinkh.p.com Assistant: Ingrid Busch Highly Confidential xhjbjt .eslie Rock wood CSR RPR HPC_003621 69

Transcript of HP-Itanium-docs.pdf

Page 1: HP-Itanium-docs.pdf

From: Hurd, MarkSent: Friday, July 16, 2010 4:22 PMTo: Donatelli, DaveCc: Bradley, Todd; Robison, ShaneSubject: RE: Intel K22 Update

Dave,

Excellent news!

Mark

This message and any attachments are confidential and may a/sa be legal/y privileged. 1f yau are nat the in tended recipient, please natify the senderimmediately. You must nat copy this message ar use it far any purpase nar publish ordisclase its contents ta any other persan.

From: Donatelli, DaveSent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 5:34 PMTo: Hurd, Mark; Bradley, ToddSubject: Fw: Intel K22 Update

The latest

From: Fink, Martin RTo: Donatelli, Dave; Robison, ShaneSent: Fri Jul 16 00:01:54 2010Subject: Intel K22 Update

Dave/Shane -

I had a call with Kirk Skaugen to review K22 contract progress. Not only did they not bring up the slate issue (I didn'tbring it up either), they want to drive to announce this via an event that Mark and Paul already have scheduled to occurat half-moon bay on August 25th

I'm not sure what exactly this means, but I have rarely seen Intel so aggressive on anything to do with Itanium EVER, andthey are working very hard to get this moving forward.

Martin

Martin FinkSr. Vice-President & General ManagerBusiness Critical SystemsHewlett-Packard(970) 898-7076marthiJinkh.p.com

Assistant: Ingrid Busch

Highly Confidential

xhjbjt

.eslie Rock wood CSR RPR

HPC_003621 69

Page 2: HP-Itanium-docs.pdf

ingrid.buschhpcom(970) 898-0782

2

Highly Confidential HPC_00362170

Page 3: HP-Itanium-docs.pdf
Page 4: HP-Itanium-docs.pdf

F rom:

Sent:To:

CC:Subject:Attachments:

Importance:Piiority:Sensitivity:

roger feigelson <rogerfeigeIsonoracIe.com>Mon Feb 142011 16:22:33 PST

andy baiIe <andy .baileyonìcle.com>sandy vella <sandy.\'e11a(iomcIe.com>

Re: 1-[P-UX and Security Patch Omissions.

ATT 105880.gif;ATT 105877.gif

Normal

Normal

None

I left a message for Russell Green in support to get some moreinformation about this situation. I'd like to see if there is anyrational reason they won't update the bulletin to show HP UX is included.

On 2/14/2011 3:29PM, andy bailey wrote:> Did we get an update from Support?>> Andy>>>>

> On 2/8/20 11 3:34 PM, sandy vella wrote:» Roger.» I would agree with you on approach and agreed that it may not be an» easy discussion.» Sandy»» On 2/8/2011 3:29 PM, roger feigelson wrote:» So I see two approaches here. Either we just be aware of this and» let Judson know, or we go into the support execs and find out» exactly why they're doing this. I prefer the latter approach» because I want to understand why this decision was made and make» sure it wasn't a rogue decision, but realize it can become» politically charged.»» Roger»» On 2/8/2011 3:25 PM, sandy vella wrote:» I was told it was a management decision. Not clear who in» management though.» Sandy»» On 2/8/2011 3: 19 PM, Roger Feigelson wrote:» All our contacts in support said was it was a decision made higher up.further confirmation/ownership? It sounds like it was done intentionally.»» Original Message»» From: "Andrew Bailey"<andy.baileyorac1e. corn>» Sent: Tue, February 08, 2011 3:02 PM» To: roger feigel son<roger.feigel [email protected]>

Highly Confidential-Attorneys' Eyes Only -Case No. 1-11-CV-203163 (Santa Clara Superior Court)

Sandy, were you able to get any

jsIieRackwood CSR RP

ORCL00967755

Page 5: HP-Itanium-docs.pdf

» Subject: Re: HP-UX and Security Patch Omissions.»» See what you can find out why, on the surface it doesn't make sense.»» Thanks.»» Andy»» On Feb 8, 2011, at 2:17 PM, roger feigelson<roger.feigelsonoracle.com> wrote:»»» Not sure what exactly is going on, but hiding the existence of the security patches for 1-IP UX onlymakes things difficult for our customers. Our customers pay the same amount for support on HP as they do onSun, so they really need to continue to get the same quality of service.»» Original Message» Subject: HP-UX and Security Patch Omissions.» Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:13:31 -0800» From: sandy vella<[email protected]>» Organization: Oracle Corporation» To: ROGER FEIGELSON<ROGER.FEIGEL [email protected]>» CC: Sandy Vella<sandy.vellaoracl e.com>»» Roger.» Per our conversation, the Oracle Database and Oracle Fusion Middleware security patches are beingshipped on all platforms; including HP-UX. Although, HP-UX has been left out of the security bulletin, whichlists specific 0/Ses that product is shipped upon. Per our conversation, it appears that we will not update thecurrent bulletin to include HP-UX. The next security patch is available in April. We are not sure at this point, ifthe same omission will occur again for the HP-UX platform.»» I wanted to point this out, as several customers and HP have noticed this omission.»» Sandy» --»» Sandy Vella

IDirector

» Phone: +1 6505064130IFax: +1 6505064130 Mobile: +1 6502557462

» Oracle Global Technical Alliances» 500 Oracle Parkway, Box OPL-C2036 Redwood Shores, CA 94065» Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment»»» --» Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>» Sandy Vella Director» Phone: +1 6505064130 <tel:+1%206505064130> Fax: +1 6505064130»<fax:+1%206505064130>IMobile: +1 6502557462 <tel:+1%206502557462>» Oracle Global Technical Alliances» 500 Oracle Parkway, Box OPL-C2036

IRedwood Shores, CA 94065

» Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed» to developing practices and products that help protect the environment»»» Roger Feigel son Sr. Director, Strategic Global Alliances 650.506.4798

Highly Confidential-Attorneys' Eyes Only - 0RCL00967756Case No. 1-1 1-CV-203163 (Santa Clara Superior Court)

Page 6: HP-Itanium-docs.pdf

» ORACLE Worldwide Alliances and Channels» 500 Oracle Parkway

IRedwood Shores, CA 94065»

Roger FeigelsonISr. Director, Strategic Global Alliances

I650.506.4798

ORACLE Worldwide Alliances and Channels j500 Oracle Parkway

IRedwood Shores, CA 94065

Highly Confidential-Attorneys' Eyes Only - 0RCL00967757Case No. 1-11-CV-203163 (Santa Clara Superior Court)

Page 7: HP-Itanium-docs.pdf
Page 8: HP-Itanium-docs.pdf
Page 9: HP-Itanium-docs.pdf
Page 10: HP-Itanium-docs.pdf

From: Tim Kelly <tim. kelly©oracle. corn>Sent: Sun Mar 27 2011 08:14:29 PDTTo: Sarah Hunter <sarah.hunter©oracle.corn>

David Simmons <[email protected]>; Mark Moretti <[email protected]>; RichardReuter <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: Migration Services - RetrieverAttachments:

Importance: NormalPriority: Normal

Sensitivity: None

looks good. did anything change from last one?

i'm not sure we want to consider this, but i'll throw it out there anyway. because oracle is essentially dictating amove from HP/Itanium, should/can we make this more of a service specific to that? "To help migrate off of yourItanium environment".

I laugh at the first sentence "Do you need to evolve your existing HP infrastructure to meet more demandingservice levels, contain costs or avoid IT obsolescence?" - because we are the ones dictating IT/Itanium obsolescencein this case.

Mark would know far better than I if this is too specific, but I did lobby Bob & Sonny over the weekend to createmore around Itanium migration specific messages and aircover. this would fit in that category i think.

tim

On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Sarah Hunter wrote:

> Tim,> I know you wanted to review any updates to the resources.> Here is the Migration Data Sheet update from Mark Moretti. Copying David too, for reference.>> From a process perspective, I believe you wanted to "approve" any new postings, so I will look for your approvalto post.>> Special thanks to Mark for the fast turn-around.>> Thanks,> Sarah> <DS-Oracle HP Platform Migration Service_v5.1.pdf><Attached Message Part.html><PastedGraphic-3 tiff> <Attached Message Part. html> <PastedGraphic-3 .tiff> <Attached Message Part.html> <PastedGraphic-2.tiff>'zAttached Message Part.html>

CC:

Exhibit

WitDateLesbe RoCkWO0d CSRRP

Highly Confidential - Attorneys Eyes Only - ORCLOI 607452Case No. 1-1 1-CV-203163 (Santa Clara Superior Court)

Page 11: HP-Itanium-docs.pdf

Conversation with [email protected] at 7/28/2011 2:18:55 PM [email protected] (jabber)

(2:18:55 PM) [email protected]: you there?(2:19:01 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: yes i am(2:19:07 PM) [email protected]: on a plane?(2:19:37 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: i am(2:19:42 PM) [email protected]: are you on a break(2: 19:55 PM) anje.dodsonorac1e.com: we&apos;re done. mh had a forecast call at i i(2:20:05 PM) [email protected]: it was judy&apos;s so it went fast(2:20:11 PM) [email protected]: does it bug anybody else(2:20:23 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: that every two weeks mark gets on a fcst call with all the evpdirects(2:20:28 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: or is it just me(2:20:46 PM) anje.dodsonorac1e.com: oh i&apos;m sure it bugs - but you know -no one says anything.(2:21:15 PM) [email protected]: so am i mud out there(2:21:18 PM) [email protected]: how much time is left to sell???(2:21:23 PM) [email protected]: you know(2:21:28 PM) [email protected]: you are NOT mud...nèver are(2:21:29 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: it's not like we dont know what we are doing(2:21:37 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: amateur hour(2:21:44 PM) anje.dodsonorac1e.com: yep(2:22:01 PM) [email protected]: hold on - someone is calling me(2:22:05 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: k(2:37:01 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: hello(2:47:19 PM) [email protected]: ok back(2:47:28 PM) [email protected]: joanne(2:47:36 PM) [email protected]: she&apos;s a treat(2:47:36 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: she's duckin me(2 :47:47 PM) [email protected]: why?(2:47:56 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: she is stealing revenue from me(2:48:01 PM) [email protected]: of course she is(2:48:22 PM) [email protected]: she doesn&apos;t like anyone who has a different style than her(2:48:42 PM) [email protected]: she ain't all that(2:48:44 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: she gets rattled(2:49:02 PM) [email protected]: finance thinks she doesn&apos;t understand how a P&L works!(2:49:09 PM) [email protected]: um dat's not good(2:49:10 PM) [email protected]: so(2:49:15 PM) [email protected]: hurd trashed me huh(2:49:22 PM) [email protected]: no, he did not trash you.(2:50:03 PM) [email protected]: it was the same conversation he had with you about andy and thenumbers. it came up when judson went thru his review(2:50:11 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: i told mark(2:50: 15 PM) [email protected]: and you know how he is with numbers(2:50:24 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: that the channel numbers were fullfiliment(2:50:29 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: the channel does not sell independently(2:50:49 PM) [email protected]: so judson can say whatever he wants, it's not incrementalrevenue(2:50:52 PM) keith.block@öracle.com/Beehive: and mark knows that(2:50:57 PM) keith.block@orácle.comfBeehive: why doesn't mark focus on bic(2:51:06 PM) [email protected]: he's shrinking 15%(2:51:10 PM) [email protected]: because you bring in the most money!(2:51:21 PM) [email protected]: maybe if emea did it's j ob he wouldn't have to

DateRebecca Romano, CSR #12546

Highly Confidential-Attorneys' Eyes Only - 0RCL00585603Case No. 1-1 1-C V-203163 (Santa Clara Superior Court)

Page 12: HP-Itanium-docs.pdf

(2:51:24 PM) [email protected]: you&apos;re the best and only bet to grow(2:5 1:29 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: how nice(2:5 1:41 PM) [email protected]: he should focus on steve. our china revenue is peanuts(2:5 1:54 PM) [email protected]: he doesn't like to travel(2:52:01 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: he likes to stay in the u.s. and rattle around(2:52:09 PM) [email protected]: it&apos;s his comfort zone(2:52:10 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: lots ofnoise, not much results(2:52: 17 PM) [email protected]: be a flicking global president(2:52:29 PM) [email protected]: :)(2:52:56 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: sorry(2:53:04 PM) [email protected]íBeehive: 5th week travelling(2:53:11 PM) [email protected]: ugghh(2:53:18 PM) [email protected]íBeehive: it's ok they take good care of me(2:53:25 PM) [email protected]: they should(2:53:27 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: just dont like the distraction from the i ith floor(2:53:3 1 PM) [email protected]/I3eehive: him(2:53:33 PM) [email protected]/l3eehive: nice guy(2:513:38 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: not enough room for us both(2:53:45 PM) [email protected]: he should be a ceo(2:53:58 PM) [email protected]: he&apos;s used to that role for sure(2:54:16 PM) [email protected]: he needs you(2:55:17 PM) [email protected]: so.......can we talk about linda&apos;s bonus. sorry for añother greatsubject(2:55:23 PM) [email protected]: we have to stop meeting like this(2:56:42 PM) [email protected] you wont meet with me in person(2:56:46 PM) [email protected]íBeehive: ok(2:56:48 PM) keith.blockcâjoracle.com/Beehive: linda's bonus(2:57:03 PM) [email protected]: what can you live with. she&apos;s in for 40k(2:57:12 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: 39.9999(2:57:20 PM) [email protected]: i knew you would say that(2:57:41 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: whatever i give you for a number, he is going to counter offer(2:57:46 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: so what number is he thinking about(2:57:54 PM) [email protected]: no, he&apos;s not, because i&apos;m plugging in and approving it(2:58: 10 PM) [email protected]: he didn&apos;t give a number, he asked me to talk to you to pull itdown.(2:58: 16 PM) [email protected]: 35(2:58:17 PM) [email protected]ßeehive: 32(2:58:19 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: what do you think(2:58:25 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: she's really bummed about the stock(2:58:33 PM) [email protected]: she hates hurd(2 58 38 PM) anje dodson@oracle corn how about 33k(2:58:42 PM) anje.dodsonoracle.com: i bet...(2:58:47 PM) [email protected]: ok(2:58:51 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: she's gonna hate me(2:59:04 PM) [email protected]: tell her it&apos;s not you. and don&apos;t throw me under the bus!(2:59:24 PM) [email protected]: it&apos;(2:59:35 PM) [email protected]: it&apos;s all about sales(2:59:41 PM) [email protected]: i have been a staunch defender of you(2:59:45 PM) [email protected]: who&apos;s bringing in the revenue(2:59:52 PM) [email protected]íBeehive: and all of the attacks you have been subject to(3 :00:08 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: KIDDING(3:00:09 PM) [email protected]: now i&apos;m feeling vulnerable(3:00:15 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: everybody loves you(3:00:19 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: how's janet lewis

Highly Confidential-Attorneys' Eyes Only - 0RCL00585604Case No. 1-1 1-CV-2031 63 (Santa Clara Superior Court)

Page 13: HP-Itanium-docs.pdf

(3:00:25 PM) [email protected]: my buddy(3:00:27 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: we should tell her to fuck off(3:00:31 PM) [email protected]: she resigned, did you hear?(3:00:36 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: no(3:00:40 PM) [email protected]/BeehiVe: that's great news(3:00:40 PM) [email protected]: and so far - no fireworks from hp(3:01:06 PM) [email protected]: mh doesn&apos;t think there will be....but who knows(3:0 1 : 14 Nv» [email protected]/Beehive: he's in the know(3:0 1:20 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: does he talk about canham(3:01:23 PM) [email protected]: yes he is(3:01:40 PM) [email protected]: he doesn&apos;t say anything negative about andy(3:01:59 PM) [email protected]: meaning - that guy&apos;s horrible - nothing like that(3:02:27 PM) [email protected]: hejust talks about his forecast the uncertainty about making thenumbers(3:02:57 PM) [email protected]: you know this is mark&apos;s sweet spot, right - hardware(3 :03 :02 PM) [email protected]: yeah(3:03:05 PM) keith.block@oraclecornfBeehive: here's the deal(3:03:10 PM) [email protected]: this isn't hp(3:03:12 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: we bought a dog(3:03:15 PM) [email protected]: it's all about exa(3 :03:20 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: asking reps to sell the dog(3 :03:24 PM) [email protected]: is not a great thing(3:03:30 PM) [email protected]: mark wants us to sell the dog(3:03:30 PM) [email protected]: exactly.(3 :03:35 PM) [email protected]ßeehive: sorry(3 :03:42 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: wants the hdw peeps to sell the dog(3:03:51 PM) [email protected]íBeehive: every single call(3:03:55 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: 4 yesteray(3:03:58 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: 2 today(3:04:00 PM) [email protected]: all about exa(3:04:03 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: nobody talks about sun(3 :04:05 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: even the sun customers(3:04:08 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: it's dead dead dead(3:04:17 PM) [email protected]: he did acknowledge that it&apos;s hard to recruit guys to sell sun - butnot exa(3:04:26 PM) keith.block®oraclecomfBeehive: exa is easy(3:04:31 PM) [email protected]ßeehive: nobody wants to sell sun(3:04:37 PM) keith.block@oraclecomfBeehive: it baaaalllll00000000ws(3 :04:37 PM) [email protected]: pigwith lipstick(3 :04:42 PM) keî[email protected]: at best(3 06 22 PM) anje dodson@oracle corn we did have a good discussion about workday - marketing wise andyour pmo was highlighted(3:06:33 PM) [email protected]ßeehive: we're good(3:06:35 PM) [email protected]: gotta shut down(3:06:40 PM) [email protected]/Beehive: landing in the nations capital

Highly Confidential-Attorneys' Eyes Only - 0RCL00585605Case No. 1-1 1-CV-2031 63 (Santa Clara Superior Court)