"How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting...

53
SGIP eMeeting 26 September 2013 1:00 – 2:00pm ET

description

SGIP hosted an eMeeting focused on Stakeholder Category 14: R&D and Academia. Leading experts presented on the impact of Smart Grid research on future products and services and how research contributes to new solutions for interoperability for the Smart Grid ecosystem. The panel was moderated by Steve Widergren, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Joining Steve as panelists were Don Von Dollen, Electrical Power Research Institute; Michael Cohen, MITRE; Jason Veneman, MITRE; and Dennis Ray, Power Systems Engineering Research Center. An appraisal on the various SGIP technical activities was presented, including updates on transactive energy, cybersecurity and Smart Grid Testing and Certification Committee and Smart Grid Implementation Methods Committee activities. An update was also given on a new Catalog of Standards entry to be voted on by SGIP Participating member organizations. - See more at: http://www.sgip.org/sgip-presents-how-todays-power-grid-integration-choices-impact-figure-smart-grid-deployments-emeeting-on-september-26-2013/#sthash.8fzknMkc.dpuf

Transcript of "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting...

Page 1: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

SGIP eMeeting

26 September 2013

1:00 – 2:00pm ET

Page 2: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

eMeeting Moderator

Patrick J. GannonPresident & Executive Director,

SGIP

Page 3: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

SGIP eMeeting Agenda• Welcoming Remarks John McDonald• Smart Grid Innovations Steve Widergren

Don Von DollenMichael CohenDennis Ray

• Inaugural Conference Blaine Kohl

• Technical Updates, CoS Susan Hoyler

• Wrap-up Q & A Patrick Gannon

Page 4: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Welcoming Remarks

John D. McDonald, P.E.Chairman of the Board, SGIP

Director, Tech. Strategy & Policy Dev.GE Digital Energy

Page 5: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

• Board of Directors Meeting o July 31 - August 1

• Stakeholder Categories

• Inaugural Conference

• Technical Activities Update

Chairman’s Message

Page 6: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

“Smart Grid Innovations

Demand Interoperability to

Accelerate Deployments”

A Focus on SGIP’s Research &

Development Stakeholders

Panel Session:

Page 7: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Panel Moderator

Steve WidergrenSGIP Board Member 

Category 14: R&D and AcademiaPacific Northwest National Laboratory

Page 8: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

SGIP Category 14 R&D Organizations and Academia

Analysis Group, Inc. Observing MemberCalm Sunrise Consulting, LLC Participating MemberCarnegie Mellon University Observing MemberCoordinated Science Laboratory - University of Illinois Participating MemberElectric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Participating MemberGas Technology Institute Participating MemberHelikon.net Participating MemberIE Technologies Participating MemberLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) Participating MemberMetatech Corporation Participating MemberMITRE Corp. Participating MemberMitsubishi Electric Research Labs Observing MemberNational Renwable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Participating MemberNEC Laboratories America Observing MemberOak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Participating MemberPacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Participating MemberPower Systems Engineering Research Center (PSERC) Participating MemberRCES Center from Univ. of Texas at El Paso Observing MemberRebecca Herold and Associates Participating MemberReef Energy Systems, LLC Observing MemberReilly Associates Observing MemberSandia National Laboratories Participating MemberSmarthome Laboratories, Ltd Observing MemberThe University of Tokyo Observing Member

Page 9: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Panelists

Don Von DollenEPRI

Sr Program Manager, Data Integration & Communications

Jason VenemanMITRE

Sr Artificial Intelligence Engineer

Dr. Michael CohenMITRE

Principle Critical Infrastructure Systems Engineer

Dennis RayPSERC

Deputy Director

Page 10: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Don Von DollenSenior Program Manager, Data Integration & Communications

Overview of EPRI’s Smart Grid Interoperability R&D

Page 11: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

11© 2012 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

EPRI Smart Grid R&D

Page 12: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

12© 2012 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

EPRI Activities Associated with Key Smart Grid Standards

Standards Development

Harmonization Demo Testing Training

IEC 61850

IEC 61868 / 61870 (CIM)

IEEE 802

IEEE 1815 (DNP3)

Open ADR

Smart Energy Profile 2.0

CEA 2045

Page 13: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

13© 2012 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Why SGIP is Important to EPRI

• Raises the visibility and importance of interoperability

• Orchestration and acceleration of activities across the entire Smart Grid interoperability “community”

• Increases investment and leverages resources

• Engages the broad range of stakeholders

Page 14: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

© 2013 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

Dr. Michael L. Cohen and Jason Veneman

September 26, 2013

Smart Grid Research and Support to the SGIP

Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. 13-3256

Page 15: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

| 15 |

© 2013 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

Model smart grid vulnerability, combining topological features & network physics Results using identical analysis techniques for disparate networks have

sullied the risk analysis of coupled power and communication networks.

Combining our strengths in complex systems analysis and cascading failure risk will move the discussion beyond toy models to focus on the real vulnerabilities.

The key contribution of this new model of vulnerability is its combination of:

1. Sufficient engineering accuracy

2. Computational tractability.

All rights reserved. Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. 13-3256

Page 16: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

| 16 |

© 2013 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

Replicating and extending prior work

Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. 13-3256.

Correlated couplings more

robust but…

Modeling physics tells a far different risk story*

* Preliminary results

Page 17: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

| 17 |

© 2013 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

Support to the SGIP

• Support to Smart Grid Cybersecurity Committee (SGCC)– Participate in SGCC and

Subgroups: Architecture High Level Requirements (HLR) Standards

– Technical inputs included:• NISTIR 7628 Cybersecurity

Guidelines Rev1 – applicability of security controls to interfaces

• Introduced concept of Resilience into Cybersecurity discussions and SGCC documents

Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. 13-3256

Page 18: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Power Systems Engineering Research Center

Dennis Ray, Deputy Director ([email protected])

A National Science FoundationIndustry/University Cooperative Research Center

Page 19: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

PSERC

• NSF Industry/University Cooperative Research Center: lead university at Arizona State Univ.

• Collaborative, Industry-Supported, Multi-disciplinary Research: Power Systems, T&D Technologies, Power Markets and Policies

• Federally-Supported Research• Consortium for Electric Reliability Technology Solutions

• Future Grid for Enabling Sustainable Energy Systems

• 13 universities with 50+ faculty and 60+ graduate students working on the projects (and more “in the wings”)

• Web page: www.pserc.org

19

Page 20: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

20

Collaborating Universities and Site Directors

• Arizona State University - Gerald Heydt

• University of California at Berkeley - Shmuel Oren

• Carnegie Mellon University - Marija Ilic

• Colorado School of Mines - P.K. Sen

• Cornell University - Lang Tong

• Georgia Institute of Technology - Sakis Meliopoulos

• Howard University - James Momoh

• University of Illinois at Urbana - Peter Sauer

• Iowa State University - Venkataramana Ajjarapu

• Texas A&M University - Mladen Kezunovic

• Washington State University - Anjan Bose

• University of Wisconsin-Madison - Chris DeMarco

• Wichita State University - Ward Jewell

Page 21: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

21

Current Industry MembersMidContinent ISO

Mitsubishi Elec. Research LabNASA

National Renewable Energy Lab.National Rural Elec. Coop. Assn.

New York ISONew York Power AuthorityPacific Gas and Electric

PJM InterconnectionPowerWorld Corp.

RTE (France)Salt River Project

Southern California EdisonSouthern Company

Southwest Power PoolTVA

Tri-State G&TU.S. DOE

Western Area Power Admin.

ABBAmerican Electric Power

American Transmission Co.ALSTOM Grid

Arizona Public ServiceBC Hydro

Bonneville Power Admin.California ISO

CenterPoint EnergyDuke Energy

EPRIExelon

GE EnergyFirstEnergy

Institut de recherche d’Hydro-Québec (IREQ)

ISO New EnglandITC Holdings

Lawrence Livermore National Lab

Page 22: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

PSERC Participation in SGIP

• Research perspective: understanding standards and interoperability is part of the knowledge-base needed for innovative research

• Education perspective: this understanding is needed by the next generation of engineers

• PSERC: a Founding member of SGIP 2.0

• Mladen Kezunovic, TAMU, past SGIP Board member representing stakeholder group 14 (academic and research organizations) for two terms, 2009-2013

• Communications about SGIP from Mladen to PSERC’s university and industry communities

22

Page 23: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Examples of PSERC ProjectsPower Systems• S-45: Testing and Validation of Phasor Measurement

Based Devices and Algorithms (on-going)• S-39: The Smart Grid Needs: Model and Data

Interoperability, and Unified Generalized State Estimator (final report 2012)

Transmission and Distribution Technologies• T-45: The Next Generation EMS Design (final report 2013)• T-50G: The Electricity and Transportation Infrastructure

Convergence Using EVs (on-going)• T-51: Systematic Integration of Large Data Sets for

Improved Decision-Making (on-going)

Power Markets• M-27: Impact of Bad Data and Cyber Data Attack on

Electricity Market Operation (final report 2013)23

Page 24: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Future Communications about SGIP

• Presentation about SGIP to PSERC (Mladen and SGIP leadership)

• How to participate in SGIP and working group activities (SGIP instructions)

• Website information access information (SGIP instructions)

• Support of Stakeholder Group 14 representative on the Board of Directors (Steve Widergren)

• Education of PSERC members about SGIP value and opportunities (joint efforts between SGIP and PSERC)

24

Page 25: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

What areas of your smart grid research are moving into the marketplace? 

• PSERC research results: have long-term impact since we are setting the stage for new applications that require interoperability

• Commercialization examples: PowerWorld, wide-area control software, and other software/algorithms for EMS/DMS

• Methodology for testing of products (PMUs): PSERC demonstrated that more work on synchrophasor interoperability is needed

• Standards development: PSERC researchers are actively involved in standards working groups

25

Page 26: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

What areas of standardization and testing should SGIP focus on to enable your technology R&D interests to flourish?  What barriers prohibit new ideas from deployment?

• PSERC does research in many areas. We need stable, comprehensive, future-oriented standards to enable research for innovative application development (e.g., measurements in 37.118-1, integration of IED data in IEC 61850, integration of EMS data in IEC 61970)

• Research examples: synchrophasors, demand-side management (load as a resource), renewable resource integration, markets, energy management systems (EMS, DMS), planning, asset management and maintenance

26

Page 27: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

What is your R&D institution doing to enable interoperability through system design patterns and new information integration research?

• Number of our projects and researchers work on information integration and make specifications that can be readily used to develop interoperability criteria in the following areas:

- Integration of IED data in future substation

- Harmonization of IEC 61850 and CIM

- Integration and use of electric vehicles

- Standard models for planning studies

And we’re educating the next generation of power engineers!

27

Page 28: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

A DOE National Lab’s Perspective26 September 2013

STEVE WIDERGRENPrincipal Engineer, Energy & Environment Directorate, PNNL

Richland, WA

Page 29: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Smart Grid R&D at PNNL

Architecture and standardsSmart Grid Interoperability Panel (SGIP)

GridWise Architecture Council (GWAC)

Distributed control theory – transactive energyOlympic Peninsula demo

AEP gridSMART RTP demo

PacNW Smart Grid demo (Battelle)

Simulation and modelingGridLAB-D simulation tool

Infrastructure & end-use models

Prototypical distribution feeders

29

Page 30: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

30

More R&D Highlights

Analyze T&D technology impactsAnalysis of integrated volt-VAR control

Demand response business case

Estimate technical potential of ARRA grant projects

PHEV penetration analysis, smart charger with demand response, V2G “drive cycles”

Microgrids and resiliency

Technology: Grid-Friendly™ functionalityHome energy management systems, appliances advance control strategies, PHEV smart charger

0

5

10

15

20

25

Mill

ions

Bar

rels

Per

Day

Total20.6

US Production

8.2

NetImports

12.5

Trans-portation

13.8

Industry5.0

Res, Com, Electricity

1.8

Gasoline9.1

potential PHEV

displacement6.5

Page 31: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

31

Why SGIP is Important to PNNL

Reliability & sustainability challenges demand transformational change

SG broadens coordination & efficiencies in networked energy systems

SGIP uniquely bridges professional areas of expertise

Stakeholder alignment on standards needed for technology penetration

SGIP engages industry stakeholders to drive alignment and paths to market transformation

Balance Consensus

AlignmentInclusive

Page 32: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Panel Questions & Answers

Steve Widergren

Page 33: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Inaugural Conference

Blaine KohlDirector Marketing & Membership

SGIP

Page 34: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

PGA National HotelPalm Beach Gardens, Florida

Working Group Sessions November 4-5

http://sgip.org/sgip-inaugural-conference-2/

Page 35: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Who Should AttendThose Involved in:

Bulk GenerationDistribution

MarketsService Providers

TransmissionCustomersOperations

 PositionsExecutives

Systems IntegratorsMarketing Managers

IT ProfessionalsStandards EngineersVenture Capitalists

Policy MakersManaging Directors

Page 36: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Hot Topics

• Microgrids• Transactive Energy

Framework• Green Button Initiative• Cybersecurity• Advanced Metering

Infrastructure & Outage Management Systems

• Utility perspectives for building resiliency

• Industry perspectives on Smart Grid interoperability standards

• Sensors, Data and Internet of Things

• International Perspectives

Page 37: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Sample Keynotes

Thomas Gross Vice Chairman and COO Electrical Sector, Eaton Lisa Polak Edgar

Commissioner, Florida Public Service Commission, NARUC

Dr. Ahmad Faruqui Economist and Principal, The Brattle Group

Hank Kenchington Deputy Assistant Secretary, Advanced Grid Integration, Department of Energy

Page 38: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Early Register by September 30

Page 39: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Update on SGIP Technical Activities

Susan HoylerDirector Technical Operations

SGIP

Page 40: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

SGIP Member Groups

Page 41: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Update on SGIP Technical Activities

• Transactive Energy (TE) Management Working Party formed in Smart Grid Architecture Committee to examine TE across all domains.

• Sensors for Transmission and Distribution Networks– SGIP Gas Technologies WG is launching discussion

of a new proposed PAP for Distributed Pressure Sensor that can be linked to Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) / Automated Meter Reading (AMR)

Page 42: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Update on SGIP Technical Activities

• Smart Grid Cybersecurity Committee (SGCC): NISTIR 7628- final draft of Guidelines for Smart Grid Cyber Security being reviewed

• SGCC completed white paper “Cloud Computing Considerations in the Smart Grid — Assessing and Implementing Cloud Computing Initiatives that Potentially Impact the Smart Grid”

Page 43: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Update on SGIP Technical Activities• Smart Grid Testing and Certification Committee

(SGTCC): Identifying testing needs and priorities, particularly from the perspective of utilities - currently conducting survey to utilities for input on testing priorities

*more input desired from utilities in both Committees

• Smart Grid Implementation Methods Committee (SGIMC): working to develop a clearinghouse and forum for real world experiences in smart grid deployment, including IEC 61850 implementation

Page 44: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Domain Expert Working Groups

• PAP 21: Weather Information will launch its first meeting in October 2013

• Distributed Renewables, Generation & Storage (DRGS) DEWG: – Defining plans to coordinate development of test

procedures and test plans for grid interactive Smart Inverter functions

• DRGS Subgroup C: Defining use cases based on Microgrid demonstration projects

Page 45: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Domain Expert Working Groups

• DRGS Subgroup B: White Paper: “Resiliency and Security Recommendations for Distributed Energy Resources (DER) Cyber-Physical Systems” is being reviewed

• DRGS Subgroup B: White Paper “Distributed Energy Resources (DER): Hierarchical Classification of Use Cases and the Process for Developing Information Exchange Requirements and Object Models” near completion

Page 46: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Domain Expert Working Groups

• Building to Grid (B2G)/Industry to Grid (I2G): – Preparing Electrical Storage vs. Thermo Storage

white paper

• Recruiting more participation from storage experts

– Preparing white paper: “Transactive Energy Retail Applications”

• Could result in new requirements for PAP

• More participation from regulators and utilities desired

Page 47: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Domain Expert Working Groups

• Transmission and Distribution (TnD): – Discussion of additional Distributed Energy

Resource (DER) domain in SG Conceptual Model and Architecture –related to harmonization activities with European Union

– Ongoing development of Transmission Bus Load Model

• Home to Grid (H2G): – Investigating the impact of Transactive Energy on

residential devices and findings may result in white paper or use case scenarios

Page 48: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Domain Expert Working Groups

• Home to Grid: – Adapting home appliances for Load Following and

Frequency Regulation (tools for Grid stability)– Investigating impact of micro inverters on

Residential Power Systems

• Business and Policy (BnP):– adhoc group formed to explore framework for data

sharing and usage agreements between interacting parties (utilities, aggregators, etc.)

Page 49: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Catalog of Standards

• A reference guide on standards and practices that advance interoperability for Smart Grid applications

• SGIP industry experts conduct a rigorous technical review

• Reviews provide an objective assessment against stated criteria

• Reviews assist in evaluating interoperability concerns in Smart Grid projects

Page 50: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Catalog of Standards Ballots4Q 2013

• IEC 65241 OPC Unified Architecture (OPC-UA)

• ITU-T G.9961 Data link layer (DLL) for unified high-speed wire-line based home networking transceivers (G.hn/DLL)

• ITU-T G.9901 Narrowband orthogonal frequency division multiplexing power line communication transceivers – Power spectral density specification

• ITU-T G.9902 Narrowband orthogonal frequency division multiplexing power line communication transceivers for ITU-T G.hnem networks

• ITU-T G.9903 Narrowband orthogonal frequency division multiplexing power line communication transceivers for G3-PLC networks

• ITU-T G.9904 Narrowband orthogonal frequency division multiplexing power line communication transceivers for PRIME networks

Page 51: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Catalog of Standards Ballots4Q 2013

• Multispeak 3.0/Security

• Open ADR 2.0a Profile Demand Response Energy Management

• Open ADR 2.0b Profile Demand Response Energy Management

• Smart Energy Profile (SEP) 2.0

• NISTIR 7761 v2 Guidelines for Assessing Wireless Standards for Smart Grid Applications

Page 52: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Reference

• From the sgip.org website:http://www.sgip.org/sgip-updates-members-8152013

• Access the full presentation video, and/or download the presentation slides from the previous Webinar on SGIP Technical Activities (August 15, 2013)

Page 53: "How Today's Power Grid Implementation Choices Impact Future Smart Grid Deployments" SGIP eMeeting September 26, 2013

Question & Answers

Patrick J. Gannon