How To Get Rid Of Toxic ULIP: An Example

download How To Get Rid Of Toxic ULIP: An Example

of 6

Transcript of How To Get Rid Of Toxic ULIP: An Example

  • 7/29/2019 How To Get Rid Of Toxic ULIP: An Example

    1/6

    Sub: Filing perjury, breach of contracts case etc. against the agents and witnesses of the ULIPs of Bajaj

    Allianz Insurance Company and Standard Chartered Bank, India

    I shall not commit the grievous sin of losing faith in Man.

    --Crisis of Civilization, Rabindranath Tagore

    This is to inform you that I have four policies with Bajaj Allianz Insurance Company. All the policies were

    mediated by the Standard Chartered Bank, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

    The policies are as follows:

    POLICY

    NOS.

    DOC SUM

    ASSURED

    PREMIUM LAST

    PREMIUM

    DOM AGENTS WITNESS

    I. 0160209908 20/03/10

    .

    Rs. 250000 Rs. 50000 20.03.16 20.03.20. Arnab

    Sengupta

    Agent Code:

    5111012820

    Debabrat

    Choudhu

    II. 0132842390 28/08/09 Rs. 125000 Rs. 25000 28.08.18. 28.08.19. Sharmishtha

    Das

    Agent Code:

    5111006665

    Rupanjan

    Chatterje

    III. 0000318843 26/04/02 Rs. 200000 Rs. 7362 26.04.21. 26.04.22

    IV. 0184158148 17/03/11 Rs. 300000 Rs. 60000 ?????? ?????? SCB

    Acronyms: DOC: Date of commencement; DOM: Date of Maturity; SCB: Standard Chartered Bank

    The allegations are against the following witnesses, my trusted above-mentioned Banks faithful

    employees and my ex-friends, who had signed my policy documents along with me:

  • 7/29/2019 How To Get Rid Of Toxic ULIP: An Example

    2/6

    1. Debabrata Choudhury

    Cell: 9830185334

    Standard Chartered Bank, Shyambajar Branch

    21 A R. G. Kar Road, Kolkata- 700004

    Name not written in capital alphabet in the bond

    2.

    Rupanjan Chatterjee

    Cell phone no. not available.

    Standard Chartered Bank, Shyambajar Branch

    21 A R. G. Kar Road, Kolkata- 700004

    3. Arnab Sengupta

    Address not mentioned in the bond

    Cell phone no. not available.

    4.

    Sharmishtha Das

    Cell: 9830470450 (Phone calls not attended by her)

    Address not mentioned in the bond

    Before elaborating the allegations against all these four persons, I must mention the following points

    regarding III and IV:

    (a) The III is normal endowment policy for my son, Akhar Bandyopadhyay and it was gifted by my

    mother, Late Sova Bandyopadhyay to his grandson. I do not have any allegations against this

    policy except low returns compared to Life Insurance Corporation of India.

    (b) The premium paid for the IV was returnedto me without any compensationin October, 2012

    by SCB after much battle as my allegation was the opacity of the bondalmost nothing was

    written in the bond, thus it had infringed Right To Information (RTI, 2005). This has a serious

    implications for other policies (to be elaborated afterwards)

    Now I am going to elaborate my case of losing faith in Man(sic, sexism unintended) I, Dr. Debaprasad

    Bandyopadhyay, S/o Late Sadhan Prasad Bandyopadhyay and Late Sova Bandyopadhyay of Anekanta,

    23/1, JoyNarayan Banerji Lane, Baranagar, Kolkata-700036, aged 47 years, by faith agnostic, solemnly

    affirm in the name of the Indian Constitution, the following statements:

    (c) In the cases of policies I and II, the witnesses and agentsall of them were my trusted friends,

    misguided me by making false verbal promises, intentional false verbal statements and

    fabricating the true values of policies (Perjury IPO 191, 192, 193).

    I must admit my fault that as a busy academician, it is very difficult for me to maintain my financialportfolio. Therefore, I depended on Standard Chartered Bank (SB Ac. No.333-1-011551-7) with a full

    faith, trust for maintaining my financial portfolio. And lastly it is turned into a breach of oral contract as

    they had made me to sign many documents without being given a chance to go through it. Thus they

    exploited my innocence, honesty and dependency on the bank by selling toxic ULIPs.

    Analogy:In case of intercourse with a verbal assurance of marriage and later on refusing to lead

    conjugal life in the context of heterosexual relationship, the event of heart balm is considered as a crime

  • 7/29/2019 How To Get Rid Of Toxic ULIP: An Example

    3/6

    of cheating on the part of assurer. (Section 415, I.P.C. and as such prima facie amounts to an offence

    under Section 417, I.P.C). If so, why is it not applicable to other cases of cheating with verbal

    assurances/promises?

    For this reason, let me look into the proved criminal pasts of these two service provider, viz :

    A. ALLEGED CRIMINAL HISTORY OF STANDARD CHARTERED BANK

    Involved in Beirut bombing case in 1983, though the case was withdrawn for unknown

    reason (2012). The same thing happened to its1992 FERA violation case (The Financial

    Express, NEW DELHI, NOV 17 2012, 01:18 IST). In the both cases, somehow they had

    escaped the allegations. The estates of victims of the 1983 bombing of U.S. Marine

    barracks in Beirut have dropped a lawsuit against Standard Chartered Plc (STAN.L)that

    accused the bank of concealingIranian transactions that could have satisfied a $2.67

    billion (1.65 billion pounds) judgment. (Reuters, NEW YORK | Wed Dec 12, 2012

    8:58pm GMT)

    Involved in illicit drug trafficking: The Justice Department has signed similar

    agreements, withholding prosecution in exchange for bank promises to tighten

    oversight, Barclays and Standard Chartered. All admitted to criminal offenses; all were

    handed the equivalent of traffic tickets pay a fine on your way out the door. (Source:

    The Opinion Page, January 2, 2013)

    Involved in Harshad Mehta scam 1992: Standard Chartered Banks draft red herring

    prospectus to raise $500 million-$700 million through the first-ever issue of Indian

    Depository Receipts (IDRs) has completely blanked out at least 15 litigations pendingagainst it in connection with the securities scam of 1992 and a foreign exchange scandal

    involving the misuse of its vostro account, also in the 1990s.The prospectus has

    reportedly been cleared by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), which is

    fully aware that most litigations pertaining to the 1992 scam are still dragging their way

    through the Indian judicial system. It is shocking that the Bank has attempted to avoid

    disclosure, given that the Bank's deep involvement in the scam is widely known in India

    and the IDRs are being sold to Indian investors. What is worse, when asked about the

    failure to disclose litigation pending against the Bank, SEBI has chosen to not to respond

    to the emails marked to the entire top brass of the Bank. (Source: Sucheta Dalal,

    Standard Chartered tries to cover up its messy past, but SEBI is in a slumberStandardChartered tries to cover up its messy past, but SEBI is in a slumber April 14, 2010)

    Involved in money-laundering in Iran 2012: IN A bombshellstatement New Yorks

    Department of Financial Services added Standard Chartered, a British bank, to the rank

    of financial institutions under siege, calling it a rogue institution. It accuses Standard

    Chartered of executing 60,000 secret transactions worth $250 billion for Iranian

    http://uk.reuters.com/business/quotes/overview?symbol=STAN.Lhttp://uk.reuters.com/places/iranhttp://www.dfs.ny.gov/banking/ea120806.pdfhttp://www.dfs.ny.gov/banking/ea120806.pdfhttp://uk.reuters.com/places/iranhttp://uk.reuters.com/business/quotes/overview?symbol=STAN.L
  • 7/29/2019 How To Get Rid Of Toxic ULIP: An Example

    4/6

    customers in exchange for hundreds of millions of dollars in fees. In a footnote the

    regulator also says that there is evidence of similar schemes with other countries

    subject to American sanctions, including Libya, Myanmar and Sudan. (Source: The

    Economist, Aug 6th 2012, 22:07 by T.E. | NEW YORK)

    Standard Chartered follows dubious distinction of Citibank, 4 clients duped of crores:

    In yet another banking fraud at the hands of greedyrelationship managers of the

    foreign banks, some employees ofStanChart are believed to have duped a few wealthy

    clients. According to reports, a few relationship managers atStandard

    Chartered Bank'sprivate banking business here have mis-sold debt securities to some of

    its private banking clients with a promise to buy them back at higher returns, something

    which is not possible under the existing regulations. (Source: Economic Times, 30 APR,

    2011, 08.45PM IST, PTI )

    To veil all these misdeeds SCB takes its recourse to welfare capitalism that obviously maintains social

    hierarchy at the expenses of our hard-earned money-signifier looted by them deploying unfair means.They think that the gimmick of one-day-breakfast to the poorest of the poor is enough for eye-washing.

    B. ALLEGED CRIMINAL HISTORY OF BAJAJ ALLIANZ INSURANCE COMPANY

    Taking serious note of violation of claims servicing regulations by Bajaj Allianz General

    Insurance, insurance regulator Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has

    asked it to scrupulously adhere to the norms.The regulator has also directed Bajaj Allianz to

    put in place a system so that all claim/papers/documents are properly docketed. PTI, Jan 8,

    2013 (Source: The Hindu Business Line)

    Bajaj Allianz to pay Rs 16.65 lakh compensation to road mishap victim' s(Mahinder Babber)

    family. The tractor driver and its owner did not contest the case while the insurance company

    contended that the accident took place due to the deceased Babber's negligence. The insurance

    company said the truck driver and owner were liable to pay the compensation amount as the

    driver was not holding a valid driving license at the time of accident. PTI: NEW DELHI, MAR 06

    2013, 17:04 IST (Source: The Financial Express)

    Criminal complaint against Bajaj Allianz, Team Life Care Insurance: Both the companies

    indulged in all types of violations while selling insurance policies. No policy should charge more

    than 40 per cent as charges from the policy amount as per the Insurance Act, 1938. But in this

    case almost 70 per cent has gone as premium charges. As per the Section 41 of Insurance Act,1938, no agent whether Individual or corporate agent should employ sub-agents to sell

    insurance policies. With the connivance of Bajaj Allianz, the Team Life Care Insurance is

    indulging in such malpractices.(Source:Corporate Frauds Watch,THURSDAY, 20 NOVEMBER

    2008)

    http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/relationship-managershttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/StanCharthttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Standard-Charteredhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Standard-Charteredhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/private-banking-businesshttp://corporatefraudswatch.blogspot.in/http://corporatefraudswatch.blogspot.in/http://corporatefraudswatch.blogspot.in/http://corporatefraudswatch.blogspot.in/http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/private-banking-businesshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Standard-Charteredhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Standard-Charteredhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/StanCharthttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/relationship-managers
  • 7/29/2019 How To Get Rid Of Toxic ULIP: An Example

    5/6

    Keeping in mind such criminal background of these two companies, I must say that their criminal

    mindset has been operating in all the cases of miss-selling investment policies in the name of insurance

    policies. All these cases have strengthened my allegations against these two companies.

    Apart from the abovementioned allegations against these two companies, I have further allegations

    against Standard Chartered Bank:

    In case of House Building Loan (Floating), beware of rigging/cheating! When interest rate is

    low in the market, they do not decrease the rate following market! However, in case of

    increased market rate on interest, their action is too prompt.

    In case of redemption of accrued bonus points for using cards, you will never get awards as

    the phone-banking personnel always answer, That is lapsed.There is no auto-credit

    system! Surprising!!!

    MY DEMANDS:

    With reference to (b), keeping in mind the precedence, I wish to get back I and IIs full

    investment with compensation.

    I wish to get compensation for IV.

    In addition to that, I need to have compensation of Rs. 20,00000 INR for causing mental agony,

    depression, frustration, wasting my time etc. by selling market-linked products by verbally

    suppressing facts.

    I wish to know the utilization of allocation charges, taken for I & II through Right To Information

    Act (2005). I suspect that money-signifier was utilized by the same ethical fraud (a neologism to

    describe writing-speaking aporia) in money-laundering among terrorists. Not only that, I have

    another query: What service has Bajaj Allianz really given to deserve getting 35%-65% (covert

    and overt charges) of the investment over three years to administer the policy? The fund

    administration charge is separately levied to manage the fund, but I am anticipating fraudulent

    allocation of units.

    Proper punishment of the witnesses and agents along with Insurance company and bankers.

    Lastly, I am appealing to the concerned authorities, with a good faith that to treat this type of case in

    holistic perspective so that, not only me but all the victims of such cheating could be benefitted. All the

    victims are crying for unknowingly buying ULIPs by hearing false promises. Our country, from the Vedicera, has been depending on oral transmission (archewriting in Derridean sense of the term) of

    knowledge and wisdom. Indian citizens are largely depending on verbal assurances. In that case,

    blackmailing (Sorry for this racist term that unveil white mythology) them with forms written in a small

    illegible letters is a crime vide Taking note that fine print terms and conditions imposed "unilaterally"

    by a company cannot be used to their advantage, a district consumer forum has asked the Standard

    Chartered Bank to compensate one of its clients with Rs 50,000. It has also asked the bank to "remove

  • 7/29/2019 How To Get Rid Of Toxic ULIP: An Example

    6/6

    the hold on his account," "credit back Rs one lakh," and remove all annual charges. "It shows that unfair

    trade practices are galore and such terms in fine print cannot be read to the advantage if persons who

    unilaterally imposed these," stated the order passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum

    (district New Delhi). (Source: The Times of India, Jan 2, 2013, 04.41 PM IST)

    Yours Sincerely,

    S/D Dr. Debaprasad Banyopadhyay

    11/03/13