How strange is the nucleon? Martin Mojžiš, Comenius University, Bratislava
description
Transcript of How strange is the nucleon? Martin Mojžiš, Comenius University, Bratislava
How strange is the nucleon?
Martin Mojžiš, Comenius University, Bratislava
• Not at all, as to the strangeness SN = 0
• Not that clear, as to the strangness content
NdduuN
NssNy
2
NssdduuNm
m
N
22
ˆbaryon octet masses
NdduuNm
m
N
2
ˆ)0(
pNdduupNmputpu ,',ˆ)()()'(
22 2,0 MtDF
N scattering (data)
N scattering (CD point)
2)'( ppt
Nmus 4)(
)2( 2 M
the story of 3 sigmas (none of them being the standard deviation)
baryon octet masses
)0(
N scattering (data)
N scattering (CD point)
)2( 2 M
26 MeV
64 MeV 64 MeV
64 MeV
Gell-Mann, Okubo Gasser, Leutwyler
Brown, Pardee, Peccei
data
Höhler et al.
simple LET
the story of 3 sigmas
26 MeV
64 MeV
NssdduuNm
m
N
22
ˆ
NdduuNm
m
N
2
ˆ
yNdduuN
NssN
2
ˆ
6.0
OOPS !
big y
NHNm
m QCDN
N 2
1
NssNm
mNdduuN
m
mNHN
m N
s
Nmassless
N 22
ˆ
2
1
2ˆy
m
ms NHNm massless
N2
1
26 0.364 MeV
376 MeV 64 MeV 500 MeV
big y is strange
NssmddmuumNNHNNHN sdumasslessQCD
big why
Why does QCD build up the lightest baryon using so much of such a heavy building block?
statesgluonandquarkiicN i
NHN massless
s d
ssdduumassless mmmNHN ###
sddduu mmm ###
does not work for s with a buddy d with the same quantum numbers
but why should every s have a buddy d with the same quantum numbers?
big y
• How reliable is the value of y ?
• What approximations were used to get the values of the three sigmas ?
• Is there a way to calculate corrections to the approximate values ?
• What are the corrections ?
• Are they large enough to decrease y substantially ?
• Are they going in the right directions ?
small y ?
?
N scattering (data)
)2( 2 M
SU(3)
SU(2)L SU(2)R
SU(2)L SU(2)R
analycity & unitarity
group theory
current algebra
current algebra
dispersion relations
the original numbers:
qmmmmmm
qH sdusmass
830
3
ˆ
23
ˆ2
the original numbers:
qmm
qH ssplitmass 8
3
ˆ
ssdduumm s 2
3
ˆ
• controls the mass splitting (PT, 1st order)• is controlled by the transformation properties
• of the sandwiched operator• of the sandwiching vector
hHh splitmass
hsplitmassH
1
4
11 2 IIYcbYam
cbNssdduuNmm
ms
N 2
12
3
ˆ
2
1
(GMO)
26ˆ
1902
1
392
1
mm
MeVmmb
MeVmmc
s
N
MeV26
qavipsDiqL fieldsextQCD
55.
the original numbers: 0 22 M
1
5.
2
1cugmiL A
fieldsexteffective
the tool: effective lagrangians (ChPT)chiral symmetry
d
uqext
d
u sm
ms
0
0
n
p
0
20 4
8 sF
BBs
sss 00
0s Bic 41 dependencetno constt
the original numbers: 22 M
1
5.
2
1cugmiL A
fieldsexteffective
0
20 4
8 sF
BBs
0s)(
4 021 dependencemomentumnos
F
Bic ab
a
b
other contributions to the vertex: • one from , others with c2,c3,c4,c5
• all with specific p-dependence
• they do vanish at the CD point ( t = 2M2 )
for t = 2M2 (and = 0) both (t) and (part of) the N-scattering
are controlled by the same term in the Leff
the original numbers: MeV856
• a choice of a parametrization of the amplitude
• a choice of constraints imposed on the amplitude
• a choice of experimental points taken into account• a choice of a “penalty function” to be minimized
extrapolation from the physical region to unphysical CD point
• many possible choices, at different level of sophistication
• if one is lucky, the result is not very sensitive to a particular choice
• one is not• early determinations: Cheng-Dashen = 110 MeV, Höhler = 4223 MeV
• the reason: one is fishing out an intrinsically small quantity (vanishing for mu=md=0)
• the consequence: great care is needed to extract from data
• see original papers
• fixed-t dispersion relations
• old database (80-ties)• see original papers
KH analysis
underestimated error
N scattering (data)
)2( 2 M
SU(3)
SU(2)L SU(2)R
SU(2)L SU(2)R
analycity & unitarity
group theory
current algebra
current algebra
dispersion relations
corrections:
ChPT
ChPT
ChPT
corrections:
q
Nq
N
q
m
mmNqqN
m
m
2
Feynman-Hellmann theorem
q
qqbq
qqbq
qqbb mDmCmBAm 2,
2/3,,
BorasoyMeißner
• 2nd order Bb,q (2 LECs) GMO reproduced
• 3rd order Cb,q (0 LECs) 26 MeV 335 MeV
• 4th order Db,q (lot of LECs) estimated (resonance saturation)
MeV734
corrections: 0
3rd order Gasser, Sainio, Svarc
integral loop2
34
2
22
12 tItI
F
MgcMt A
MeVF
MgM A 7
64
302
2
322
4th order Becher, Leutwyler
LECorder 4 one with term1402 th2 MeVM
estimated from a dispersive analysis(Gasser, Leutwyler, Locher, Sainio)
MeVM 4.02.152 2
corrections: 22 M
3rd order Bernard, Kaiser, Meißner
MeVM CDCD 35.02 2
4th order Becher, Leutwyler
LECorder 4 one with term0 th MeVCD
large contributions in both (M
2) and canceling each other
MeV1
estimated
corrections: MeV760
• a choice of a parametrization of the amplitude
• a choice of constraints imposed on the amplitude
• a choice of experimental points taken into account• a choice of a “penalty function” to be minimized
• see original papers
• forward dispersion relations
• old database (80-ties)• see original papers
Gasser, Leutwyler, Sainio
forward disp. relations data = 0, t = 0
linear approximation = 0, t = 0 = 0, t = M2
less restrictive constrains
better control over error propagation
)0(
N scattering (data)
N scattering (CD point)
)2( 2 M
335 MeV (26 MeV)
447 MeV (64 MeV)
597 MeV (64 MeV)
607 MeV (64 MeV )
data
corrections:
24.025.0 y
new partial wave analysis: MeV90
• a choice of a parametrization of the amplitude
• a choice of constraints imposed on the amplitude
• a choice of experimental points taken into account• a choice of a “penalty function” to be minimized
• see original papers
• much less restrictive -
• up-to-date database +• see original papers
VPI
no conclusions:
• new analysis of the data is clearly called for
• redoing the KH analysis for the new data is quite a nontrivial task
• work in progress (Sainio, Pirjola)
• Roy equations used recently successfully for -scattering
• Roy-like equations proposed also for N-scattering
• a choice of a parametrization of the amplitude
• a choice of constraints imposed on the amplitude
• a choice of experimental points taken into account• a choice of a “penalty function” to be minimized
• Becher-Leutwyler• well under controll• up-to-date database• not decided yet
Roy-like equations
• work in progress