How Preschoolers Think - Duquesne Universitymathcs.duq.edu/~packer/Courses/Psy225/Wk6.pdfS Korea...
Transcript of How Preschoolers Think - Duquesne Universitymathcs.duq.edu/~packer/Courses/Psy225/Wk6.pdfS Korea...
How Preschoolers Think
Week 6
Overview of Chapter 8
! Physical & Motor Development
! Preoperational Development
! Information-Processing Approaches
! Privileged Domains! Cognitive Development &
Culture! Reconciling Alternative
Approaches
! Bio-Behavioral Foundations
! The Play-Doh Task
! Piaget’s Account of Early Childhood
Thinking
Overview of this week
Early Childhood (age 2-6)
Typical pattern of thinking
in preschool years
! Mixture of sound logic and
magical thinking
! Insight and ignorance
! The reasonable and
the irrational
The Play-Doh Task…
! a Piagetian task
! a window into the mind of the preschooler
! a “conservation” task
! “failure to conserve”
! how do you know it is the same?
The two pieces are the same
because…
You understand:
Piaget: Failure
to Conserve
Piaget: Conservation of Number
Children below the age of 6 or 7 rarely
display conservation of number, and will
say that the elongated row has more.
video: failure to conserve
video: failure to conserve
BBC NEWS | Health | Glass shape 'affects drink size' http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4552668.stm
1 of 2 12/23/05 5:55 PM
Home News Sport Radio TV Weather Languages
UK Version International Version
Whisky was one of the drinks people were asked to pour
The real problem is that people just do not known what constitutes a unit of alcohol
Moira Plant, professor of alcohol studies
About the versions | Low Graphics | Help | Contact us
News Front Page
Africa
Americas
Asia-Pacific
Europe
Middle East
South Asia
UK
Business
Health
Medical notes
Science/Nature
Technology
Entertainment
-----------------
Have Your Say
In Pictures
Week at a Glance
Country Profiles
In Depth
Programmes
Last Updated: Friday, 23 December 2005, 11:54 GMT
E-mail this to a friend Printable version
Glass shape 'affects drink size'
People are more likely to
pour extra alcohol into
short, wide glasses than
tall, narrow glasses, a study
says.
The US researchers from
Cornell University asked 198
students and 86 bartenders
to pour a shot of alcohol.
They found students poured 30% more into the short
glasses, while bar workers faired only slightly better at 20%,
the British Medical Journal said.
The groups poured more than a standard shot measure into
both types of glasses.
Students also said they thought the tall glasses held more,
suggesting they were trying to compensate for size when
pouring into the short, wide glasses.
The people participating in
the study were asked to pour
four different types of drinks -
vodka tonic, rum and cola,
whisky and gin and tonic.
Practise led students to pour less into tall glasses, but did
not affect the amount put in the short ones, while bar staff
poured less in each.
Lead researcher Brian Wansink said the findings suggested
people should think more carefully about the measures they
pour and it might be useful to mark on glasses to signify
what equates to a shot.
And he added: "If short tumblers lead even bartenders to
pour more alcohol than tall highball glasses the way to
better control alcohol consumption is to use tall glasses or to
use glasses with the alcohol level marked on them - and to
realise that, when alcoholic drinks are served in a short wide
glass, two drinks are actually equal to two and a half."
Moira Plant, professor of alcohol studies at the University of
the West of England, said: "The real problem is that people
just do not known what constitutes a unit of alcohol.
"Evidence suggests that at home, people will pour
themselves larger measures than those served at pubs.
SEE ALSO:
UK alcohol sales 'buck the trend' 24 Aug 05 | Health
Surge in alcohol-related deaths 15 Aug 05 | England
Hospitals see child drinking rise 01 Aug 05 | Health
Alcohol 'as harmful as smoking' 04 Feb 05 | Health
RELATED INTERNET LINKS:
University of the West of England
British Medical Journal
The BBC is not responsible for thecontent of external internet sites
TOP HEALTH STORIES NOW
S Korea cloning research was fake
Nigeria to offer free Aids drugs
Glass shape 'affects drink size'
Hangover cures 'don't work'
| What is RSS?
Piaget’s Account of Early
Childhood Thinking
Piaget’s Stages of Thinking
Infancy (Birth-2): Sensorimotor ! Intelligence based on overtly physical acts
Early childhood (2-6): Preoperational! Intelligence based on mental representations
! But this intelligence show severe limitations
Middle childhood (6-12): Concrete Operational! Manipulation of symbols and internalized mental operations
that combine, separate, and transform information logically
Adolescence (12-19): Formal Operational! Thinking systematically about all logical relations within a
problem; keen interest in abstract ideas and thinking itself
The Limitations of
Preoperational Intelligence
1. Egocentrism
2. Confusion of
appearance
and reality
3. Precausal
reasoning
Limitation 1: Egocentrism
! Tendency to consider the world entirely in terms of one’s own point of view
! Preschoolers cannot “decenter” (i.e., see things from another’s perspective)
! Illustrated in
! Lack of spatial perspective taking…
! Egocentric speech…
! Failure to understand other minds…
Lack of Spatial Perspective Taking
! Allowed to view diorama (3 mountain experiment) from all sides
! Seated on one side; doll on opposite side
! Shown pictures from various perspectives and asked to identify how things would look to doll
! Almost always chose view corresponding to their own point of view
Egocentric Speech
Egocentric Speech
! Tendency to engage in “collective monologues”
! Speaker gave too little information
(e.g., “Take this one”)
! Listener
asked
too few
questions
Failure to Understand Other Minds
Failure to Understand Other Minds
! Inability to engage in mental perspective taking (i.e., think about other people’s mental states – “theory of mind”)
! When the child corrects a false believe, they think others will too! Discover that a box with a
picture of candy on the outside has only a pencil inside
! Believe that a friend who has not yet seen what is in the box will think that it has a pencil
! Form of moral reasoning that does not take intentions into account, only consequences of actions
The Limitations of
Preoperational Intelligence
1. Egocentrism
2. Confusion of
appearance
and reality
3. Precausal
reasoning
Limitation 2: Confusing
Appearance and Reality
! Tendency to focus exclusively
on the most striking aspects of
an object (i.e., surface
appearance)
! A stick placed in water has really
bent
! Become frightened when
someone puts on a mask
! Believe that a cat with a dog
mask actually turns into a dog…
Confusing Appearance and
Reality
The Limitations of
Preoperational Intelligence
1. Egocentrism
2. Confusion of
appearance
and reality
3. Precausal
reasoning
Limitation 3: Precausal Reasoning
! Instead of reasoning from general premises to
particular cases (deduction) or from specific
cases to a more general premise (induction),
preschoolers tend to think
transductively (i.e., from
one particular to another)
! “I haven’t had a nap, so it
isn’t afternoon.”
! Since graveyards are places
where dead people are found,
graveyards must be the cause of death
Piaget’s explanation of these
limitations
Piaget sees the glass as half
empty
! We must remember that the child is only
beginning to use mental representations
! mental actions are now possible, but not
mental operations
! that’s why this is pre-operational intelligence
! But it’s still pretty amazing!
! The infant cannot think; the preschool-age
child can, albeit with limitations
There are Various Explanations
of Children’s Uneven Cognition
1. Information-Processing Explanation
2. Domain-Specific Knowledge
! privileged domains: physics, biology, social
! Biologically-based mental modules
! Plus culturally-provided experience
How is a person like a
computer?
2: Information-Processing
Explanation ! Computer analogy
Hardware (e.g., myelination
of a particular brain region), Software (e.g., acquisition
of a new strategy for
remembering)
! The ‘magic number’ 7 (plus/minus 2)
Amazon.com: Use Both Sides of Your Brain: Books: Tony Buzan http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0452266033/sr=8-1/qid=11401...
1 of 8 2/17/06 9:54 AM
Quantity: 11
or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click
ordering.
A9.com users save
1.57% on Amazon.
Learn how.
More Buying Choices
65 used & new from $2.99
Have one to sell?
Share your own customer images
Search inside this book
Martin'sStore
BooksSee All 32
Product Categories Your Account | Cart | Wish List | Help |
AdvancedSearch |
BrowseSubjects | Bestsellers |
The New York Times®Best Sellers | Magazines |
CorporateAccounts |
AmazonShorts |
BargainBooks |
UsedBooks | Textbooks
Search BooksBooks
Join Amazon Prime and ship Two-Day for free and Overnight for $3.99.
Use Both Sides of Your Brain (Paperback)by Tony Buzan
Explore: Citations | Concordance |
Text Stats | CAPs
Browse: Front Cover | Copyright |
Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index |
Back Cover | Surprise Me!
List Price: $14.00
Price: $11.20 & eligible for
FREE Super Saver
Shipping on orders over
$25. See details
You Save: $2.80 (20%)
Availability: Usually ships within 24 hours. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
65 used & new available from $2.99
(17 customer reviews)
Rate it I Own It
Also Available in: List
Price:
Our
Price:
Other Offers:
Hardcover (3rd ed)9 used & new from
$23.69
Paperback16 used & new from
$1.47
Unknown Binding (1st
American ed)
39 used & new from
$0.01
Better Together
Buy this book with The Mind Map Book : How to Use Radiant Thinking... by Tony Buzan today!
Total List Price: $39.00
Buy Together Today: $27.70
Customers who bought this also bought
The Mind Map Book : How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximize Your Brain's Untapped Potential by Tony
Buzan
Use Your Perfect Memory : Dramatic New Techniques for Improving Your Memory; Third Edition by Tony
In this Information-Processing
model:
! Cognitive difficulties may be due to:
! poor attention
! small working memory
! slow transfer to long term memory! few strategies for memorization
! Performance improves as children grow
because:! the ‘hardware’ matures! the ‘software’ improves! ‘storage’ gets larger
What’s your favorite bedtime
story?
! On Sundays Maurice Sendak and his brother and sister
were dressed up and had to sit in the living room with
their adult relatives.
! Looking up, he saw “the
most gruesome things, such
as moles on noses and
extra-long hairs coming out
of noses . . . the bloodshot
eyes, and . . . the very bad
teeth”
Where the Wild Things Are
! Oral language provides a new way of
understanding the world
! analogous to ancient mythology
! in an oral culture, you know only what you
can remember
! with stories, metaphors, rhythm & rhyme
! drama & roleplay
! abstract binary oppositions:
! good/evil, love/hate, rich/poor
! a poetic world
Mythic understanding
What Piaget ignored:
! Children can now represent the world around them,
with images, words, and gestures.
! Mental actions are now possible - but not yet mental
operations
! Representations are simple, ego-centered, and static
! So children can’t identify cause & effect, tell
appearance from reality, or take another’s perspective
! They show lack of conservation
! But Piaget failed to see that fantasy in oral language
is an important way of understanding the world
Main Points: Cognition in Early
Childhood