HOW NOT To predict ELECTIONS

15
Panagiotis T. Metaxas CS, Wellesley College & CRCS, Harvard University Joint work with Eni Mustafaraj and Dani Gayo-Avello

description

HOW NOT To predict ELECTIONS. Panagiotis T. Metaxas CS, Wellesley College & CRCS, Harvard University Joint work with Eni Mustafaraj and Dani Gayo-Avello. Overview. Social Media can “ predict the present/future ” Success stories Electoral Predictions with Social Media - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of HOW NOT To predict ELECTIONS

Page 1: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

Panagiotis T. MetaxasCS, Wellesley College &

CRCS, Harvard University

Joint work with Eni Mustafaraj and Dani Gayo-Avello

Page 2: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

OverviewSocial Media can “predict the present/future”

Success storiesElectoral Predictions with Social Media

Successful Predictions

Can Twitter predict US Elections?Elsewhere: Can Google Trends predict US

Elections?

How To Predict Elections using Social Media

Page 3: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

Social Media can “predict the future” (?!)

Page 4: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

To Predict (according to Merriam-Webster)

Page 5: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

Successful Electoral Predictions

This slide was intentionally left blank

Page 6: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

Successful Would-be PredictionsMethods Used:

Raw volume of TweetsSentiment Analysis of Tweets

Data Used:2009 German Elections Tweets2008 US Presidential Elections Tweets

Our Data:2010 Special Senatorial Elections (MA) Tweets2010 Senatorial Elections (CO, NV, CA, KY,

DE) Tweets

Page 7: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

Can Twitter Volume Predict?

Twitter volume (would have) predicted correctly 50% of the high-visibility US Congressional races

Page 8: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

Can Tweet Sentiment Predict?

Sentiment analysis (would have) predicted correctly 50% of the high-visibility US Congressional races

But was it sensing the sentiment correctly?

Page 9: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

“What if you had used some other methods?”We did not invent the methods we used,

we just evaluated them on data other than those they were designed for

We started off expecting to predict successfully(In fact, we were “predicting” at times ;-)

But we learned a lot from these experiments:

How to Predict Using Social Media

Page 10: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

How To PredictA method of prediction should be an algorithm

finalized before the elections: (input) how Social Media data are to be

collected, including the dates of data collection, (filter) the way in which the cleanup of the data

is to be performed (e.g., the selection of keywords relevant to the election),

(method) the algorithms to be applied on the data along with their input parameters, and

(output) the semantics under which the results are to be interpreted.

Page 11: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

How To PredictA method of prediction should be an

algorithm.Data from Social Media

are fundamentally different than Data from Natural Phenomena.People will change their behavior the next time

aroundSpammers & Activists will try to take

advantagee.g. “Twitter Bomb” and “Prefab Tweeter Factory”

Page 12: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

How To PredictA method of prediction should be an

algorithm.Data from Social Media

are fundamentally different than Data from Natural Phenomena.

Form a testable theory on why and when it predicts.Go past the OMG! FactorAvoid the self-deception syndrome

Page 13: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

How To PredictA method of prediction should be an algorithm.Data from Social Media

are fundamentally different than Data from Natural Phenomena.

Form a testable theory on why and when it predicts.

(maybe) Learn from the professional pollsters.Tweet ≠ UserUser ≠ Eligible VoterEligible Voter ≠ Voter

Page 14: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS
Page 15: HOW  NOT  To predict ELECTIONS

Thank you!