How do we improve the standard of care in cataract surgery? · Cataract surgery with multifocal IOL...
Transcript of How do we improve the standard of care in cataract surgery? · Cataract surgery with multifocal IOL...
Supported by an independent educational grant from Alcon
How do we improve the standard of care in cataract surgery?
touchPANEL DISCUSSION
Unapproved products or unapproved uses of approved products may be discussed by the faculty; these situations may reflect the approval status in one or more jurisdictions.
The presenting faculty have been advised by touchIME to ensure that they disclose any such references made to unlabelled or unapproved use.
No endorsement by touchIME of any unapproved products or unapproved uses is either made or implied by mention of these products or uses in touchIME activities.
touchIME accepts no responsibility for errors or omissions.
Disclaimer
Expert panel
Prof. Elizabeth Yeu(Chair)Assistant Professor, Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School,Norfolk, USA
Dr Ramón Ruiz MesaHead of Medical Department, OFTALVIST Eye Clinic, Andalucía, Spain
Prof. Antoine BrézinProfessor of Ophthalmology, Paris Descartes University School of Medicine, Paris, France
Agenda
IOL, intraocular lens.
What IOL technologies are available for patients with cataracts?
How do we select the most appropriate IOL for the patient and meet patient expectations?
What has been the experience with multifocal IOLs in patients with cataracts?
What IOL technologies are available for patients with cataracts?
Prof. Elizabeth Yeu(Chair)Assistant Professor, Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School,Norfolk, USA
Dr Ramón Ruiz MesaHead of Medical Department, OFTALVIST Eye Clinic, Andalucía, Spain
Prof. Antoine BrézinProfessor of Ophthalmology, Paris Descartes University School of Medicine, Paris, France
IOL, intraocular lens.
Worldwide incidence of presbyopia
OUS, outside US.Source: 2019 Market Scope Estimates. Courtesy of Prof. Elizabeth Yeu.
Contributing factors:
• Aging population
• Longer life expectancies
• Longer working careers
• Near-vision needs
• Growing middle class in emerging markets
People with presbyopia
around the globe in 2019 –
growing to
by 2024
2.0 Billion
2.3 Billion
Presbyopes 2019 2024
US 128.7 M 136.5 M
OUS 1.9 B 2.2 B
Panel Question HereHow have recent developments in IOLs impacted cataract surgery?
IOL, intraocular lens.
US
Japan
Europe
OWN
China
S America
India
ROW
1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
Thousands of IOLs
5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000
Monofocal Monovision PC-IOL
-
Market Scope (2017 IOL Report)
IOL usage
Current frequently adopted IOL approaches worldwide
IOL, intraocular lens; OWN, other wealthy nations; PC-IOL, presbyopia-correcting IOL; ROW, rest of world.Source: Market Scope (2017 IOL Report). Courtesy of Prof. Elizabeth Yeu.
• The use of PC-IOLs is still limited across the globe in comparison to monofocal or monovision IOLs
Panel Question HereWhat properties and characteristics of IOLs can influence performance, implantation and surgery time?
IOL, intraocular lens.
EDOF IOLs (Diffractive and small aperture)
The evolving landscape of presbyopia-correcting IOLs
EDOF, extended depth of focus; IOL, intraocular lens. Sieburth R, Chen M. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 2019;9:4-17.
• Presbyopia-correcting IOLs comprise an area of active, ongoing development in refractive cataract surgery
Accommodating IOLs Bifocal IOLs Trifocal IOLs
Hydrophobic vs hydrophilic diffractive trifocal IOLs (total 238 eyes/119 patients)
Comparison of two trifocal IOLs in a prospective case series
CIVA, corrected intermediate visual acuity; IOL, intraocular lens.Sezgin AB. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019;45:1539–46.
Mean CIVA At 60 cm: Significantly better in hydrophobic IOL group (p<0.001)At 80 cm: Significantly better in hydrophilic IOL group (p<0.001)
Visual acuity At 1.00 ─2.50 D: Significantly higher in the hydrophobic IOL group (p=0.011 to p<0.001)
Halos Frequency of halo and glare similar (p=0.032)Bothersome rates lower for hydrophobic vs hydrophilic (p=0.004)
Spectacle use Percentage of patients reporting never using spectacles for intermediate vision significantly higher in hydrophobic vs hydrophilic IOL group (p=0.016)
How do we select the most appropriate IOL for the patient and meet patient expectations?
IOL, intraocular lens.
Prof. Elizabeth Yeu(Chair)Assistant Professor, Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School,Norfolk, USA
Dr Ramón Ruiz MesaHead of Medical Department, OFTALVIST Eye Clinic, Andalucía, Spain
Prof. Antoine BrézinProfessor of Ophthalmology, Paris Descartes University School of Medicine, Paris, France
Factors that could influence choice of multifocal IOL implantation
IOL, intraocular lens.1. Alió JL, et al. Survey of Ophthalmol 2017;62:611–34; 2. Mester U et al. J Refract Surg 2014;30:674–8.
Pre-existing conditions, age, visual needs, realistic expectations and knowledge of the different optical designs and visual performances of IOLs1
Key factors correlated with overall satisfaction of the procedure1,2
Low astigmatismGood visual
functionLow spectacle dependence
Fewer halos/less glare
Preoperative refraction
Panel Question HereWhat are the primary goals of cataract surgery in 2020?
High patient satisfaction
rates2
Low rate of Nd:YAG
procedures2,5
Spectacle independence
2-4
Minimal halos and glare3
Best refractive outcome with
minimal complications
1,2
Primary goals of IOL implantation
IOL, intraocular lens.; Nd:YAG, neodymium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet.1. Astbury N, Nyamai LA. Community Eye Health J 2016;29:27–29; 2. RCO. Adult Cataract Surgery. January 2018. Available from: https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Cataract-Commissioning-Guide-January-2018.pdf (Accessed February 2020); 3.Mester U, et al. J Refractive Surg 2014;30:674-678; 4. Olson RJ, et al. Ophthalmology 2017;124:1–119); 5. Ursell PG, et al. Eye 2018;32:1579–89.
Panel Question HereManaging patient expectations is increasingly important: What guides your approaches?
Managing patient expectations through shared decision-making on IOL selection1,2
*e.g., limbal relaxing incisions, toric IOL. IOL, intraocular lens.1. Olson RJ, et al. Ophthalmology 2017;124:1–119; 2. Royal College of Ophthalmology. Correct IOL implantation in cataract surgery. March 2018. Available from: https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Correct-IOL-implantation-in-cataract-surgery-quality-standard.pdf (Accessed January 2020).
Discuss need for enhanced refractive procedures post-implantation*
Highlight risks associated with simultaneous bilateral cataract surgery
Have on-going conversations supported by documented discussions
Discuss factors that could influence postsurgical visual acuity or ocular health
Counsel patient on refractive target, preferred refractive outcome, lifestyle and expectations
Panel Question HereHow does ocular health impact surgical decision-making?
Preoperative ocular health
IOL, intraocular lens.Charters L. How to manage patient’s IOL expectations pre-operatively. Available from: https://www.ophthalmologytimes.com/article/how-manage-patient%E2%80%99s-iol-expectations-pre-operatively (Accessed January 2020).
Ocular health is a primary consideration for IOL candidates and surgeons should be alert to the presence of a number of conditions that can impact surgical outcomes:
Pseudoexfoliation
Advanced glaucoma
Trauma
Retinal diseases
Small atonic pupils
Corneal pathologies
What has been the experience with multifocal IOLs in patients with cataracts?
IOL, intraocular lens.
Prof. Elizabeth Yeu(Chair)Assistant Professor, Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School,Norfolk, USA
Dr Ramón Ruiz MesaHead of Medical Department, OFTALVIST Eye Clinic, Andalucía, Spain
Prof. Antoine BrézinProfessor of Ophthalmology, Paris Descartes University School of Medicine, Paris, France
Experience with modern multifocal IOLs
IOL, intraocular lens; QOL, quality of life.Alió JL, et al. Survey Ophthalmol 2017;62:611–34.
Cataract surgery with multifocal IOL implantation aims to achieve spectacle independence and visual rehabilitation for all viewing distances, so ensuring a better patient QOL
Patient satisfactionis high
Complications can be avoided in most cases
Visual and refractive outcomes are good
Optical side effects and neuroadaptation
can occur
Panel Question HereHow have outcomes in recent randomized controlled studies directed use of IOLs?
IOL, intraocular lens.
Evidence from RCTs
EDOF, extended depth of focus; IOL, intraocular lens; RCT, randomized controlled trial; VA, visual acuity.1. Wang SY, et al. Eur J Ophthalmol 2017;27:387–401; 2. Jin S, et al. BMC Ophthalmol 2019;19:78; 3. Liu J, et al. BMC Ophthalmol 2019;19:198.
Multifocal vs monofocalIOLs
• Multifocal IOLs have higher rates of spectacle independence but higher reported frequency dysphotopsia and worse contrast sensitivity vs monofocal1
Trifocal vs bifocal IOLs
• Trifocal IOLs have better intermediate VA2
• Near and distance visual performance, spectacle independence, postoperative refraction and surgical satisfaction comparable2
EDOF vs monofocal and trifocal IOLs
• EDOF IOLs vs monofocal IOLs offer better intermediate and near VA, but are associated with increased risk of contrast reduction and more frequent halos3
• EDOF IOLs vs trifocal IOLs may offer better contrast sensitivity, but at the expense of near vision3
• EDOF IOLs and trifocal IOLs are comparable for halo incidence and spectacle independence3
Panel Question HereWhat have been the conclusions from meta-analyses of RCTs comparing IOLs in patients undergoing cataract surgery?
IOL, intraocular lens.
Conclusions from meta-analyses
IOL, intraocular lens; VA, visual acuity.1. de Silva SR, et al. Cochrane Database System Rev 2016(12):CD003169; 2. Khandelwal SS, et al. Graefe's Archive Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019;257:863–75; 3. Cao K, et al. Survey Ophthalmol 2019;64:647–58; 4. Yoon CH, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33:e275.
Multifocal vs monofocal IOLs
• Multifocal IOLs more effective at improving near vision1-3
- Better uncorrected near vision
- Higher proportion of patients achieve spectacle independence
- Greater risk of unwanted visual phenomena
• Newer diffractive lenses2
- May be better than refractive lenses in near vision and quality of vision outcomes
- Less risk of halos than older diffractive lenses and refractive lenses
Trifocal vs bifocal IOLs
• Trifocal IOLs provide better intermediate VA4
• Trifocal IOLs provide similar or better distance and near VAs without any major deterioration in visual quality4
Panel Question HereWhat has been your personal experience with IOLs?
IOL, intraocular lens.
In the clinic
DFE, dilated fundus exam; MRx, manifest refraction; OCT-M, optical coherence tomography M scan; OD, oculus dexter (right eye); OS, oculus sinister (left eye); PMHx, patient medical history; SCL, soft contact lens.Image courtesy of Prof. Elizabeth Yeu.
• 69-year-old man
• Successful monovision SCL (OD plano; OS: -2.00)
• Prominent commercial real-estatebusinessman
• MRx: - OD -2.50 + 2.75 x 180 (20/30)
- OS -3.50 + 1.75 x 180 (20/50)
• PMHx: unremarkable
• OCT-M: healthy macula and DFE
educationzone.touchophthalmology.com
Thank you for watching this on-demand event
20MARCH