San Antonio Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher
Housing Authority of the City and County of San...
Transcript of Housing Authority of the City and County of San...
San Francisco Housing Authority Joaquin Torres, President
Housing Authority of the City and County of San Francisco
Leroy Lindo, Chairman
Ted Yamasaki, Vice Chair
Lottie Titus, Alternate Member
Joaquin Torres, Member
Barbara T. Smith, Acting Executive Director
1 Dr. Goodlett Place Room 408
San Francisco, CA 94102
http://www.sfha.org/
RESIDENT SERVICES, OPERATIONS AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
REGULAR MEETING NOTICE Tuesday, April 12, 2016
Resident Services, Operations and Personnel Committee Page 1 Printed 04/08/16
1. The Resident Services, Operations and Personnel Committee of the Housing Authority of the City and County of San
Francisco (Committee) is holding this meeting at 1 Dr. Goodlett Place Room 408, San Francisco, CA 94102.
2. Disability Access: Room 408 is wheelchair accessible. The closest accessible BART Station is Civic Center, three blocks from
City Hall. Accessible MUNI lines serving this location are: #42 Downtown Loop, the #71 Haight/Noriega, the F Line to
Market and Van Ness, and the Metro stations at Van Ness and Market and at Civic Center. For more information about MUNI
accessible services, call (415) 923-6142.
3. Disability Accommodations: To request assistance listening devices, real time captioning, sign language interpreter, readers,
large print agendas or other accommodations, please contact the Commission Clerk at (415) 715-3232 or [email protected] at
least 72 hours in advance of the meeting to ensure availability.
4. There is accessible parking at the following locations: two (2) designated blue curb spaces on the southwest corner of
McAllister Street at Van Ness Avenue; the Performing Arts Garage (entrance on Grove Street between Franklin and Gough
Streets), and at Civic Center Plaza Garage.
5. Agenda, minutes and attachments are available at www.sfha.org as well as the administrative office of the Housing Authority
of the City and County of San Francisco (Authority), located at 1815 Egbert Avenue, San Francisco, California 94124. If any
materials related to an item on this agenda have been distributed to the Committee after distribution of the agenda packet,
those materials are available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Authority’s Administrative Offices.
6. In order to assist the Authority’s efforts to accommodate persons with severe allergies, environmental illness, multiple
chemical sensitivity or related disabilities, attendees at public meetings are reminded that other attendees may be sensitive to
various chemical based products. Please help the Authority accommodate these individuals.
7. The use of electronic sound-producing devices at/during public meetings is prohibited. Please be advised that the meeting
Chair may remove any person(s) responsible for the ringing or use of cell phones, pagers and similar sound-producing
electronic devices from the meeting room.
8. Requests for public comment may be heard on items not on the agenda as well as after staff presentation on any Regular
Agenda Item. Speakers at Committee meetings are requested, but not required, to identify themselves and fill out cards placed
on the table at the entrance door. When the Committee considers policy testimony is welcome during the Public Comment
portion of the meeting. Testimony is not permitted when an opportunity has been given at a committee meeting for testimony
on an item. The public may address the Committee for up to two minutes or four minutes for speakers who require an
interpreter, or unless otherwise approved by the Committee. The Chair, or the Committee, may limit the total testimony to 30
minutes. A speaker may not yield his or her time to another speaker. Committee procedures do not allow for dialogue between
the Committee and the public. The Committee may not take action on a new proposal, which is not on the agenda.
Regular Meeting Tuesday, April 12, 2016 4:00 PM
Resident Services, Operations and Personnel Committee Page 2 Printed 04/08/16
ORDER OF BUSINESS
1. Call to order
2. Roll call
3. Approval of minutes:
a. Regular Meeting: March 8, 2016
Public Comment(s)
4. General Public Comment on subject matters related to the Residents Services, Operations
and Personnel Committee
5. Report(s):
a. Monthly Report: San Francisco Police Department
1. Crime Statistics
b. Monthly Report: Public Housing Operations
1. Rent Collection
2. Occupancy
3. Work Order
4. Pest Management Practices Update
c. Monthly Report: Client Placement
d. Monthly Report: Leased Housing Programs (HCV/Section 8)
e. Monthly Report: Human Resources: Attrition Update
Public comment(s)
6. Adjournment
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
RESIDENT SERVICES, OPERATIONS & PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MINUTES
MEETING MINUTES
March 8, 2016
SCHEDULED: 4:00 p.m., Room 408, 1 Dr. Goodlett Place, San Francisco, CA 94102
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS EXCUSED:
Leroy Lindo, Chairman
Ted Yamasaki, Co-Chair
Joaquin Torres, Commissioner
Lottie Titus, Alternate Member
Item 1. Call to order Chairman Lindo called the meeting to order at 4:13pm.
Item 2. Roll call Quorum present.
Item 3. Approval of minutes:
a. Regular Meeting: February 9, 2016
Public Comment(s):
None
Motion First: Commissioner Torres motioned to approve
Second: Commissioner Titus
Vote:
Ayes: Commissioners Lindo, Titus, Torres
Abstentions: Commissioner Yamasaki
Nays: None
Motion passed
Item 4. General Public Comment on subject matters related to the Residents
Services, Operations and Personnel Committee
Joanne Abernathy stated that she had requested the Board of
Commissioners of the Housing Authority of the City and County of San
Francisco to hold a Board of Commissioners meeting at Hunters Point A
West because there are a lot of issues there. She stated that there needs to
be accountability for Hunters Point A West. She added that RAD Phase II
has to be completed correctly.
President of Citywide Council Senior/Disabled (CCSD), Beverly Saba,
stated that developers are resistant to jurisdiction wide councils.
2.1.a
Packet Pg. 3
Att
ach
men
t: R
SO
P_F
inal
Min
ute
s_03
0816
(13
63 :
SF
HA
RS
OP
Min
ute
s-M
arch
8, 2
016)
Commissioner Torres stated that conversations with regards to citywide
jurisdictions are important and he would like the conversations to continue.
He asked that CCSD President, Beverly Saba and Public Housing Tenants
Association President, Joyce Armstrong report on those conversations at the
next RSOP Committee meeting.
Item 5. Report(s):
a. RAD Lease Agreement
Sr. Project Manager, Tessa Kaneene presented an update on the strategies used to
clarify the terms of the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) lease and outline
the tenants’ protections. She presented a resident house rules reference guide
created by the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development
(MOHCD). Commissioner Lindo stated that the guide was much easier to follow
than the lengthy lease. He stated that the definition of “just cause” has to be
clarified. Ms. Kaneene responded that the definition of “just cause” was identified
in many other RAD documents and she would add this concern to the agenda for
the next working group meeting with MOHCD. She stated that she would discuss
adding a column for the definition of “just cause” to the guide.
Commissioner Yamasaki asked if it was the intention that after the first year the
lease goes month to month or is the intention to give greater protections to tenants
against the month to month clause. Ms. Kaneene responded that the clause is
present in the Project Based Voucher (PBV) lease but eviction is not permissible
unless there is just cause. Commissioner Yamasaki asked if the lease would be
presented in a clear and easy way. Ms. Kaneene responded that service providers,
legal advocates, residents, PHTA and CCSD representatives, staff members from
the Housing Authority of City and County of San Francisco and MOHCD, and
development teams would be present at the lease meetings. Commissioner Lindo
added that the intent be added to the guide. Ms. Kaneene responded affirmatively.
Commissioner Titus stated that she was concerned about the lease terminology
and was glad that the guide was created. Commissioner Torres asked to have a
singular document that addresses the contradictions and provisions of the lease.
Ms. Kaneene responded that she would follow up on that request. Commissioner
Yamasaki suggested a column titled “what does this mean to me?” be added to the
guide and he asked that plain language be used. Ms. Kaneene responded that she
would discuss that with MOHCD.
b. Monthly Report: San Francisco Police Department
1. Crime Statistics
Commander O’Sullivan presented the January 2016 Public Housing crime
statistics report. He stated that Sergeant Lloyd Martin was happy to attend last
month’s meeting. He stated that he would like to have officers from their
respective districts attend the Committee meeting to report on their districts. He
thanked Joyce Armstrong for inviting him to attend the Black history/Lunar New
2.1.a
Packet Pg. 4
Att
ach
men
t: R
SO
P_F
inal
Min
ute
s_03
0816
(13
63 :
SF
HA
RS
OP
Min
ute
s-M
arch
8, 2
016)
Year celebration last month. He stated that the SFPD welcomes the opportunity to
attend the resident council meetings. Commissioner Lindo welcomed the officers
to attend the Committee meetings.
c. Monthly Report: Public Housing Operations
1. Rent Collection
Cassia Smith presented the rent collection report. Commissioner Yamasaki asked
what the number “771” under “end of month delinquencies” intended to reflect.
Ms. Smith responded that it is intended to reflect what improvements were made
after the 14-day notices and the calling and door-to-door knocking. Commissioner
Yamasaki asked if the door-to-door knocking and calling are only being done for
tenants that receive a 14-day notice. Public Housing Area Manager, Kendra
Crawford, responded that there are residents on stipulated agreements who are
sent monthly reminders. Commissioner Yamasaki thanked the property managers
and area managers for their work. Commissioner Titus stated that service
providers and property managers are working closely to make sure residents are
paying rent. Commissioner Yamasaki commended the rent collection work.
Commissioner Yamasaki asked to remove or clarify the number “771” under “end
of month delinquencies.”
2. Occupancy
Public Housing Area Manager, Kendra Crawford presented the occupancy
report. Commissioner Yamasaki asked if there was a policy on how to fill vacant
RAD units. Acting Executive Director, Barbara Smith, responded that the only
time that RAD vacant units are filled is if there is an emergency transfer. She
stated that the Authority consults with MOHCD and the developers.
Commissioner Yamasaki asked if the vacancy is reported regardless of being
RAD or non-RAD. Ms. Smith responded affirmatively.
3. Work Order
Public Housing Area Manager, Miguel Paltao presented the work order report.
Commissioner Yamasaki asked if plumbing work orders take longer than other
work orders because of the nature of the work or because of understaffing. Mr.
Paltao responded that it is a result of both. Commissioner Lindo asked if the
tenants at Randolph have heat. Ms. Crawford responded that all of the residents
were provided with portable heaters.
4. Pest Management Practices Update
Mr. Paltao provided a brief pest management update.
2.1.a
Packet Pg. 5
Att
ach
men
t: R
SO
P_F
inal
Min
ute
s_03
0816
(13
63 :
SF
HA
RS
OP
Min
ute
s-M
arch
8, 2
016)
d. Monthly Report: Client Placement
Director of Client Placement, Nicole McCray-Dickerson presented the Client
Placement report. Commissioner Lindo asked who certifies Alice Griffith residents.
Ms. McCray-Dickerson responded that the certification process is a collaborative
process between Client Placement and the Project Manager for Alice Griffith.
Commissioner Lindo asked if being a senior and having lived at Alice Griffith are
the only criteria for preference at the Dr. Davis Senior Center. Ms. McCray-
Dickerson responded affirmatively. Commissioner Lindo asked if the six (6) seniors
that are eligible are willing to move to the Dr. Davis Senior Center. Ms. McCray-
Dickerson responded that they are being referred to McCormack Baron Salazar to
complete the process. Commissioner Torres asked if it was anticipated for the
number of certified seniors to increase. Ms. McCray-Dickerson responded that she
does not anticipate any increase because they have already gone through the
applications but if anyone comes forward, they will be verified. Commissioner
Torres asked who verifies if an applicant is a Certificate of Preference (COP) holder.
Ms. McCray-Dickerson responded that COP holders are verified by MOHCD.
Commissioner Titus asked what happens to the non-COP holders. Ms. McCray-
Dickerson responded that they will be moved to the bottom of the list and they will
receive notification letters.
e. Monthly Report: Leased Housing Programs (HCV/Section 8)
Leased Housing Director, Sarah Ramler provided the Leased Housing report.
Commissioner Yamasaki asked if it was anticipated that the Authority would
achieve 2016 PIH Information Center (PIC) scores. Ms. Ramler responded that she
does not foresee any errors or losing points in the selection from the waiting list.
Commissioner Yamasaki asked if the projected scores are realistic. Ms. Ramler
responded that based on her time with the Authority, she believes the scores are
attainable and the only obstacle is the transition with the software system. She added
that her team has been working to reconcile what they have in the internal system
with that of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). She
foresees reconciling the inspections and recertification over the next couple of
months. Commissioner Yamasaki welcomed Ms. Ramler to the Authority.
Commissioner Lindo asked if any of the 15 indicators have a higher priority than the
others. Ms. Ramler responded that HQS inspections are the highest priority because
there are multiple indicators that are affected by that unit. She stated that annual
recertifications are also a top priority.
f. Monthly Report: Human Resources: Attrition Update
Deputy Executive Director, Dariush Kayhan presented the attrition report. He
reported that Edwin Jamora had been chosen as the new Director of Finance. He
2.1.a
Packet Pg. 6
Att
ach
men
t: R
SO
P_F
inal
Min
ute
s_03
0816
(13
63 :
SF
HA
RS
OP
Min
ute
s-M
arch
8, 2
016)
reported that Scott Hunter had been selected as the new Director of Human
Resources.
Public comment(s)
Ms. Abernathy stated that public comment on the reports should be split
into two (2). She stated that parts of the RAD lease have been amended.
She stated that she would like someone to do a mock lease and
recertification to see what the tenants have to go through.
Donald Rhone stated that there is an issue with BBQ pits and John
Stewart. He stated that they had agreed that BBQ pits were allowed as
long as they followed certain distance measures. Instead, the issue of BBQ
pits continues. He stated that John Stewart Housing needs a San Francisco
Police Department officer not a security guard.
Item 6. Adjournment Meeting adjourned at 5:38pm.
2.1.a
Packet Pg. 7
Att
ach
men
t: R
SO
P_F
inal
Min
ute
s_03
0816
(13
63 :
SF
HA
RS
OP
Min
ute
s-M
arch
8, 2
016)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
PCAO66SJ.
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
AL E M AN V
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE MONTH LAST YR CHANGE
0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1 0 N.A. 1 . 0 N.A. .0 2 -100.0 2 5 -60.0 0 0 0.0 .0 1 -100.0 4 4 - 0.0
8 12 -33.3
THIS LAST YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE DATE DATE CHANGE
0 0 0.0 O 0 . 0.0 3 2 50.0 2 1 100.0 0 2 -100.0 3 5 -40.0 0 0 0.0 1 2 - -50.0 5, 5 0.0
14 17 -17.6
OFFENSE CATEGORY
HOMICIDE RAPE ROBBERY AGGRAVATED ASSAULT BURGLARY LARCENY GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE STOLEN VEHICLE
TOTAL PART I CRIMES
OTHER ASSAULTS ARSON FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY WEAPONS, CARRYING) ETC. VICE, PROSTITUTION OTHER SEX OFFENSES NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA NARCOTICS - OPIATES NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS GAMBLING OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD MALICIOUS MISCHIEF LIQUOR LAWS DISORDERLY CONDUCT JUVENILE OFFENSES OTHER MUNI OTHER MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL PART. II CRIMES
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & 11
0 0 .0 0
• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'1 .0 0 0 0 3
4
12
1 -100.0 0 5 -100.0 0- 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 ' 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 ' 0.0 . 0 . 0 0.0 0 0.0 ' 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 ' 0 . 0 0.0 1 -100.0 0 1 -100.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0' 0 0.0 0
. 0 0.0
0 0.0 , , 0 0 0.0 0," 0.0 0 0 '0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 , 1 0 LA. 2 -50.0 1 2 -50.0 0 . 0.0 0 0 ,0.0 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 - 0.0 . 0 0 . 0.0 1 200.0 - 4 1 300.0
5 -20.0 . 6 ' 9 -33.3
17 -29.4
20 26 -23.1
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 8
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT PCA0665J
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
ALICE GRIFFITH
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS THIS LAST OFFENSE THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH LAST YR CHANGE DATE DATE CHANGE
HOMICIDE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 RAPE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 ROBBERY 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 2 1 100.0 4 1 300.0 BURGLARY 1 0 N.A. 2 0 N.A. LARCENY 0 1 -100.0 0 1 -100.0 GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE 1 1 0.0 1 1 0.0 STOLEN VEHICLE 1 0 N.A. 1. 1 0.0
TOTAL PART I CRIMES 5 3 66.7 8 4 100.0
OTHER ASSAULTS 1 0 N.A. 4 0 N.A. ARSOt : . 0 0 0.0 1 0 N.A. FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. 0 0 0.0 . 0 0 0.0 VICE, PROSTITUTION 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OTHER SEX OFFENSES 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA. 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - OPIATES 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0. NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS 0 1 -100.0 . 0 1 -100.0 GAMBLING . . 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD. .. 0 0 0.0 1 0 N.A. MALICIOUS MISCHIEF . 3 0 N.A. 4 1 300.0 LIQUOR LAWS . 0
. 0 0.0 . 0 0 0.0
DISORDERLY CONDUCT 0 1 100.0 0 1 -100.0 JUVENILE OFFENSES . 0 . 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OTHER MUNI . . .0 0 0.0 . 0 0 - 0.0 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS 0 1 -100.0 . 1 4 -75.0
TOTAL PART •II CRIMES - 4 . . 3 . 33.3 11 7 - 57.1
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & 11 - 9 - - 6 50.0 19 11 - 72.7
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 9
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
PCAO665J
HOUSING PRoJEcT OFFENSE REPORT
B E R N A L DWELLINGS
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS THIS LAST OFFENSE THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH LAST YR CHANGE DATE DATE CHANGE
HOMICIDE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
RAPE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ROBBERY 2 1 100.0 4 4 0.0
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 1 1 0.0 1 2 -50.0 BURGLARY 0 0 0.0 2 1 100.0
LARCENY 1 0 N.A. 2 1 100.0 GRAND THEFT JURSESNATCH 0 ' 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE 0 1 -100.0 0 1 -100.0 STOLEN VEHICLE 3 2 50.0 5 6 -16.7
TOTAL PART I CRIMES 7 5 40.0 14 15 -6.7
OTHER ASSAULTS 1 0 N.A. 1 0 N.A. ARSON ., 0 1 -100.0 0 2 -100.0 FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. 1 0 N.A. 2 1 100.0 VICE, PROSTITUTION, 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OTHER SEX OFFENSES 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA ' 1 1 0.0 1 1 0.0 NARCOTICS - OPIATES ' 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 GAMBLING 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD ' 1 0 ' N.A. 3 0 N.A. MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 1 0 N.A. 2 2 0.0 LIQUOR LAWS '. 0 ' 0 0.0 - 0 0 - 0.0 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1 •- 0 N.A.: -2 0 N.A. JUVENILE OFFENSES - - 0 0 - 0.0 0 0 0.0
OTHER MUNI - 0 - - 0 0.0 - 0 1 -100.0 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS - ' 2 1 100.0 4 - 2 100.0
TOTAL PART II CRIMES - - -
- B 3 166.7 15 9 66.7
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & IX 15 8 87.5 29 24 - 20.8
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 10
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
PCAO665J
HOUSING. PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
H A Y E S VALLEY NORTH
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS THIS LAST OFFENSE THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH LAST YR CHANGE DATE DATE CHANGE
• HOMICIDE 0 0 - 0.0 0 0 0.0 RAPE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 ROBBERY 0 1 -100.0 0 1 -100.0
• AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 0 1 -100.0 1 1 0.0 BURGLARY 1 10 -90.0 2 12 -83.3 LARCENY 5 10 -50.0 12 20 -40.0 GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE 7 11 -36.4 18 18 0.0 STOLEN VEHICLE 1 4 -75.0 4 9 -55.6
TOTAL PART I CRIMES 14 : 37 • 62.2 37 61 39.3.
OTHER ASSAULTS 2 1 100.0 3 2 50.0 ARSON 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT 0 0 0.0 1 1 0.0 FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 0 0 0.0 0 1 -100.0 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 WEAPONS) CARRYING, ETC. 1 0 N.A. 1 0 N.A. VICE, PROSTITUTION 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OTHER SEX OFFENSES 0 0 • 0.0 0 • 1 -100.0 NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA 0 0 0.0 0 1 -100.0 NARCOTICS - OPIATES 0 0 0.0 1 0 N.A. NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS 0 • 2 -100.0 1 3 • -66.7 NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS 0 • 1 -100.0 0 1 -100.0 GAMBLING • 0 • 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OFFENSE - FAMILY; CHILD •, 0 1 -100.0 • 0 1 -100.0 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 1 5 -80.0 2 6 -66.7 LIQUOR LAWS 0 0 0.0
• • 0 .0 0.0
DISORDERLY CONDUCT • 0. •'. - 3 -1000 0 5 100.0 • JUVENILE OFFENSES 0 • 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OTHER MUNI •. -0 0 0.0 - 0 0 0.0
• OTHER MISCELLANEOUS 5 1 400.0 9 1 800.0
• TOTAL PART II CRIMES 9 14 -35.7 18 23 -21.7
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I.& IX - 23 51 • -54.9 55 •
• 84 -34.5
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 11
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
THIS THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE MONTH LAST YR CHANGE,
0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 2 . 0 N.A. 1 3 -66.7 0 , 0 0.0 1. , 1: 0.0 1 ' ' 3 ' -66.7.
5 7 . -28.6
• SAN :FRANcISC0 POLICE DEPARTMENT
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
-
H A Y E S VALLEY SOUTH
FEBRUARY 2016
PCAU66SJ
OFFENSE CATEGORY
• HOMICIDE RAPE ROBBERY
• AGGRAVATED ASSAULT BURGLARY LARCENY GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE STOLEN VEHICLE
TOTAL PART I CRIMES
OTHER ASSAULTS ARSON FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. VICE, PROSTITUTION OTHER SEX OFFENSES NARCOTICS - .MARIJUANA NARCOTICS - OPIATES NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS GAMBLING• OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD MALICIOUS MISCHIEF LIQUOR LAWS DISORDERLY CONDUCT JUVENILE OFFENSES OTHER MUNI OTHER MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL PART II CRIMES
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & II
THIS • LAST YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE DATE DATE CHANGE
o • . • 1 -100.0' U. 0 0.0 U 0 0.0 0 1 -100.0 3 2. 50.0 3 . 3 . 0.0 0 0' 0.0 3. 3 0.0 2 5 ' -60.0
11 , 15 -26.7
4 • 3 33.3
0 0 0.0 0 0 . 0.0 0 0 0.0 U • 0 0.0 0 1 -100.0 .0 0 0.0
2 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 '0 0 0.0 0 • 1 •. -100.0 0 • 0 0.0 0 • 0 ' 0.0 2 0. N.A. 0 0 ' 0.0
• 0 '1 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 . • 0 0.0 2'- 3 ' -33.3
• 8 11' • -27.3
19 • • 26 • -26.9
5
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0 -100.0 0, 0.0 U
0.0 0
0.0 0
-100.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 1
N.A. 0
0.0 0
-100.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0
211 -33.3
9
13 -30.8
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 12
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
PCAO665J
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
- HOLLY COURT
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS THIS LAST OFFENSE THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE YRTO YR TO PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH LAST YR CHANGE DATE DATE CHANGE
HOMICIDE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 RAPE 0. 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 ROBBERY 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT •. 0 0 0.0 0 1 -100.0 BURGLARY 1 0. N.A. . 1. 0 N.A. LARCENY 2 1 100.0 . 3 1 200.0 GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH 0 0 . 0.0 0 0 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE 0 0 0.0 .0 0 0.0 STOLEN VEHICLE . 2 3 . .533 3 4 -'250
TOTAL PART I CRIMES 5 4 - 25.0 7 6 16.7
OTHER ASSAULTS : 0 1 -100.0 '0 . 1 -100.0 ARSON 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT 0 0.0 0 . 0 0.0 FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT .. . -.. 0 . 0.0 . 0 0 . 0.0 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. 0 0 0.0 . 0 0 0.0 VICE, PROSTITUTION 0 0 . 0.0 0 0 . 0.0 OTHER SEX OFFENSES 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - OPIATES . 0 0 0.0 . 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS 0 0 0.0 . 0 . 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS 0 0 0.0 1 0 N.A. GAMBLING . 0 . 0 0.0 . 0 0 0.0 OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD . 0 0 0.0 0 1 -100.0 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF . 1 0 N.A. . . 3 0 N.A. LIQUOR LAWS 0 0 0.0 . 0 0 0.0 DISORDERLY CONDUCT . 0 1: -100.0 . . 1 . 1 0.0 JUVENILE OFFENSES 0 0 0.0 . . 0 0 0.0 OTHER MUNI 0 0 0.0 . . . . 0 0 0.0 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS 1 - 0 N.A. . 2 0 N.A.
TOTAL PART II CRIMES 2 .. 2 0.0 . 7 . 133.3
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & II 7 6 - 16.7 . 14 9 55.0
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 13
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT. S PCA0665J
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
HUNTER'S POINT/HUNTER'S VIEW/WESTBROOK -
.
. FEBRUARY 2016
THIS THIS LAST OFFENSE THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH LAST YR CHANGE DATE DATE CHANGE
• HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0.0 •
. .RAPE •.• . 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ROBBERY . . 3 2 50.0 5 5 0.0
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 2 •. 3 . -33.3 • 4 6 -33.3 BURGLARY. ' . 2 ' 1 100.0 , 5 . . 2 ' 150.0 LARCENY . 0 0 0.0 1 3 -66.7
GRAND THEFT FURSESNATCH 0 0 , 0.0 ' 0 0 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE 3 3 0.0 ' 11 5 ,
120.0 STOLEN VEHICLE . . S ' 0 N.A. ' ' 6 2 200.0
TOTAL PART I CRIMES ' is , 9 ' 66.7 32 23 39.1
OTHER ASSAULTS' . . S 66.7 •' 7 .9 -22.2
ARSON • • • • 0 2 -100.0 • 0 3 -100.0 FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT ' • 0 0 0.0 0 0
• 0.0
FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT • 0 • 1 ' -100.0 0 1 • -100.0 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY 0 • 0 ' 0.0 • 0 0 0.0 WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. 2 ' 4 -50.0 ' 2 '6 -66.7 VICE, PROSTITUTION • • 0 0 0.0 . 0 . 0 0.0 OTHER SEX OFFENSES • 0 0 ' 0.0 • ' 0 • 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA • . 2 1 100.0 . 2 1 100.0
• NARCOTICS - OPIATES , 0 , 0' • 0.0 0 0 0.0
NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS ' 0 0 ' 0.0 ' ' 0 • • 0 • 0.0
NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS . ,
•'
• 0 . 0 , 0.0 0 0 . • 0.0
GAMBLING . ' - 0 0 ' 0.0 • . 0 0 0.0 OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD , • 0 • 2 -100.0 3 2 ' 50.0
• ' .MALICIOUS MISCHIEF . • • . 1 6
•, -63.3 . 10 10 0.0
• ' LIQUOR LAWS • • 0 0 • • 0.0 ' 0 0 • , 00
• • DISORDERLY CONDUCT ' • 1 ' 1 • 0.0 • 0 3 • 3 0.0 •
•• JUVENILE 'OFFENSES - • • ' 0 0 . 0.0 0 • 0 0.0
OTHER MUNI ,
0 • - 0 .," • 0.0 0 •
' 0 2 -100.0
• • OTHER MISCELLANEOUS 5 ' 4 ; 25.0
5
5 7' 7 ' '0.0
- . . , •, . . TOTAL PART II CRIMES •. , ,
, 16 • • ' 24 • :
5 34
5 44 ' -22.7
• GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & II '. ' • 31 ' • 33 -6.1 • - 66 • , 67 -1.5
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 14
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT - PCA0665J
HOUSING. PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
- - NORIEGA
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS THIS LAST OFFENSE THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH LAST YR CHANGE DATE DATE CHANGE
HOMICIDE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 RAPE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 ROBBERY 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 BURGLARY 1 0 N.A. 1 0 N.A. LARCENY 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 N.A. GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
• STOLEN VEHICLE 0 3 -100.0 . 0 3 -100.0
TOTAL PART I CRIMES 1 3 0
-66.7 2 3 -33.3
OTHER ASSAULTS 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 ARSON 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 . 0.0 FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT 0 . 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT - 0 - 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY - -0 0 - 0.0 - 0 0 0.0 WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 VICE., PROSTITUTION 0 0 0.0 - 0 0 0.0 OTHER SEX OFFENSES • 0 0 0 0.0
0 0 0' 0.0 NARCOTICS.- MARIJUANA - - - 0 • • 0 • 0.0 -• 0 0 • 0.0 NARCOTICS - OPIATES • : • 0 0 0.0 • 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS •
•. 0 - 0 0 0.0 •
0 0 - 0 • 0.0
NARCOTICS- OTHER DRUGS •• - 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0
GAMBLING 0 • 0 0 0.0 • 0 0 0 0.0
0 0 OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD . . 0 .- 0 - • 0.0 . • • 0 •- U 0.0 O
• MALICIOUS MISCHIEF • 0 - • 0 0 0.0 - 0 - 1 -100.0 -- •
• -: -• - LIQUOR LAWS - - - - 1 • - - 0 • o• - 0.0 - -- - 0 • 0 - - 0.0
• - - DISORDERLY CONDUCT - •- - - - 0 - . 0 - - - 0.0 - 1 • • 0 - - N.A. •
- JUVENILE OFFENSES - - • 9 •-
- 0 - - 0.0 - • 0 - 0 0.0 OTHER HUNt . 0
• 0 0 • - 0.0 - - 0 0 •0 0.0 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS - 0 ••
- -
O 0 • - • 0 -
-
0.0 0 1 . -
00 0 0 • • 0 0.0
--
TOTAL PART II CRIMES 0 0 0.0 1 1 0.0
-. 0 • • - GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & 11 - 1
0 •
• 3 -O -66.7 0 0 •
• -
0250
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 15
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
PCAO665J
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
NORTHBEACH
FEBRUARY 2016
OFFENSE CATEGORY
HOMICIDE RAPE ROBBERY AGGRAVATED ASSAULT BURGLARY LARCENY GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE STOLEN VEHICLE
TOTAL PART I CRIMES
OTHER ASSAULTS ARSON FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. VICE, PROSTITUTION OTHER SEX OFFENSES NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA. NARCOTICS - OPIATES NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS GAMBLING OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD MALICIOUS MISCHIEF LIQUOR LAWS DISORDERLY CONDUCT JUVENILE OFFENSES OTHER MUNI OTHER MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL PART II CRIMES
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & II
• THIS THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE MONTH LAST YR CHANGE
0 0 0.0 0 . 0 ' ' 0.0 1 0 N.A. 2 0 N.A. 0 1 ' -100.0 3 3 0.0 0 0 0.0
• ' 6 ' 9 -33.3 2 ' 1 100.0
14 . 14 ' 0.0
0 1 -100.0 0 0 ' 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0' 0 . , 0 . 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 . 0 0.0 0 . 0 .0.0 0 0 , , 0.0 0 0 ' 0.0 0 ' ' 0 ' . 0.0 0 0 .0.0 0 ' 0 ' 0.0 0 0 . ' 0.0 0 ' ' ' 4 ' -100.0 0 0 . 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
.0 0 ' ' 0.0 3 2 ' ' 50.0
7. , -57.1
17 . 21 '-19.0
THIS LAST YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE DATE DATE ' CHANGE
0 -. 0' 0.0 0 0 0.0 1 • 0. N.A. 2 2 0.0 0 1 -100.0 6 8 -25.0. 0 ' 0 . 0.0 17 16
, 6.3
3 . - 3 0.0
29 30 -3.3
1 2, -50.0 0 0 0.0 1 0 N.A. 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 - 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 '- 0 0.0 0 0'' 0.0 0' - 0 0.0 0 ' 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 • - 0 , 0.0 0 '0 0.0 2 4 -50.0
• 0 • 0 - 0.0 2 :- • 1 - 100.0
'1 -Xoo.0 0 - 0. 0.0 S • 4
11 • 12 •, -8.3 -
.40 ,, 42' -4.8
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 16
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
• SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT , PCA0665J
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
PING Y U E N NORTH AND SOUTH
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS THIS LAST OFFENSE THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH LAST YR CHANGE DATE DATE CHANGE
,
HOMICIDE , 0 0 0.0 0 0 ' 0.0
RAPE ' 0 0 0.0 1 0' N.A. ROBBERY 4 7 -42.9 6 16 -62.5 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 2 2 0.0 4 3 33.3 BURGLARY 8 4 100.0 12 10 20.0 LARCENY - 22 13 69.2 ' 38 32 18.8 GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH 1 ' 0 N.A. 1 1 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE 6 10 -40.0 16 26 -38.5 STOLEN VEHICLE 2 1 100.0 4' 4 - 0.0
TOTAL PART I CRIMES •, 45 '
37 , 21.6 82 92 -10.9
OTHER ASSAULTS 5 •, 7 -286 '9 ' 10 -10.0 ARSON 0 1 -100.0 ' 0 1 -100.0 FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT. 1' 0 N.A. 2 0 N.A. FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 1 0 N.A. 1 0 N.A. RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY 0 0 0.0 ' 0 0
, 0.0 WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. , 0 • 2 -100.0 0 3 -100.0 VICE, PROSTITUTION U ' . 0 0.0 2 0 N.A. OTHER SEX OFFENSES . 0 2 -100.0 2' • 3 -33.3 NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA • • 0 0 • 0.0 • 0 0 0.0
•
NARCOTICS - OPIATES • 0 - 0 • 0.0 • 0 -
1 • -100.0 NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS 0 0 0.0 - 0 0 - 0.0 NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS 0 1 -100.0 - 0 • 1 -100.0'
• 'GAMBLING • - 0 •
• 0 0.0 0 - 0 • 0.0
OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD 0 - 0 - 0.0 ' 2 0 N.A. MALICIOUS MISCHIEF '. • 8 1 - 700.0 • 12 9 33.3
• LIQUOR LAWS •. 0 0 0.0 ' 0 0 0.0 • DISORDERLY CONDUCT • • 1 •, 3 -667- 1 - 6 • -83.3
• JUVENILE OFFENSES ' 0 0 0.0 • 0 0 - • 0.0 OTHER MUNI - 0 • • 0 - 0.0 0. - 0 - - 0.0 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS 10 • 8 • - 25.0 . 15 13 15.4
" - TOTAL PART II CRIMES- , , • • 26 • 25 - 40 - 46 • 47 -2.1
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & 11 71 62 14.5 : 128 ' 139 7.9
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 17
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
PCAO66SJ'
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
PLAZA EAST -
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS OFFENSE THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH LAST YR CHANGE
HOMICIDE 0 0 0.0 RAPE 0. 0 0.0 ROBBERY 0 2 -100.0 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 0 0 0.0 BURGLARY 1 0 N.A. LARCENY 1 3 -66.7 GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH 0 0 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE 7 11 -36.4 STOLEN VEHICLE 0 2 -100.0
TOTAL PART I CRIMES 9 18 -50.0
OTHER ASSAULTS 5 4 25.0 ARSON 0 0 0.0 FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT ' 0 0 . . 0.0 FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT . 0 0 0.0 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY 0 0 0.0 WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. 0 1 -100.0 VICE, PROSTITUTION 0 0 0.0
• OTHER SEX OFFENSES . 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - OPIATES 0. 0 0.0' NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS 0 . 0 . 0.0 NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS 0 0 0.0 GAMBLING 0 0 0.0 OFFENSE - FAMILY CHILD '. 0 1 -100.0 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 0 : 0 0.0 LIQUOR LAWS . 0 0 , 0.0 DISORDERLY CONDUCT ' , 0 0 ' 0.0
. JUVENILE OFFENSES ,
' 0 . 0 , . 0.0 OTHER MUNI . 0 .. 0 0.0 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS ,
, 1 2
TOTAL PART II CRIMES .. 6 6 ,
' -25.0
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & 'II is 26 423
THIS . . LAST YR TO YR TO .. ,
PERCENTAGE DATE DATE CHANGE
0 ' 0 .0.0 1 0 N.A. 2' ' -33.3 1. 2 -50.0 3 1 ' 200.0 5 . 6 -16.7 0 0 0.0 20 20 , 0.0 1 2' -50.0
33, 34 -2.9
7 6, 16.7 0 0 , 0.0 1 0 N.A. 0 0 0.0 0 .0 0.0 0 ,
1 .-100.0, 0 - 0 0.0 0 • ' 1 • -100.0 0 0 . 0.0 1 0 N.A. 0 0 ' 0.0 0 0 ' ' 0.0 0 0 ,. 0.0 0 2 -100.0 1 - 0 N.A. o 0 0.0 0 1 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
•
4 • ,3 '33.3 '
14 • 14 ' 0.0
47 ' 48 ' -2.1
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 18
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
PCAOG65J
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
POTRERO TERRACE
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS LAST YR TO . YR TO ' PERCENTAGE DATE DATE CHANGE
0 . 0 0.0 0 .0 0.0 1 1 ' 0.0 2 3 ' -$3.3 3 3 0.0 4 5 -20.0 0 0' 0.0 13 4 225.0 3 3 ' 0.0
,
26 ' 19 . ' 36.8
3 3 ' ' 0.0 1 0 ' N.A. 1* 0 . N.A. 0 0 0.0 0 0 ', ' 0.0 0 . 1 . -100.0 0 0 . 0.0 1 0 N.A. 1 0 N.A. 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1 0 ' N.A. '0 . 0 . ' . 0.0 2 0 . N.A. 9 6 50.0 0 0 0.0 1 0 N.A. 0 0 , 0.0 0 ,. 0. . 0.0 5. $ 66.7
25 13 92.3
51 32 ' ' . 59.4
THIS OFFENSE THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH LAST YR CHANGE
HOMICIDE 0 0 0.0 RAPE 0 0 0.0 ROBBERY ' 0 0 0.0 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 2 1 100.0 BURGLARY 0 3 -100.0 LARCENY 1 4 -75.0 GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH 0 0 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE 9 0 N.A. STOLEN VEHICLE 1 1 0.0
TOTAL PART I CRIMES 13 9 44.4
OTHER ASSAULTS 2 2 0.0 ARSON 1 0 N.A. FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT 0 0 0.0 FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 0 0 0.0 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY . 0 0 0.0 WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. 0. 1 -100.0 VICE, PROSTITUTION ' 0 . 0 0.0 OTHER SEX OFFENSES 1' 0 N.A. NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA 1 0' N.A. NARCOTICS - OPIATES 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS 0' 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS 0 0 0.0 GAMBLING 0 0 0.0 OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD 0 ' 0 0.0 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 5 3 66.7 LIQUOR LAWS 0 0 0.0 DISORDERLY CONDUCT . 0 ' 0 0.0 JUVENILE OFFENSES 0 0 ' 0.0 OTHER MUNI ' 0 ' , 0 0.0 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS. 2 . 1 100.0
TOTAL PART II CRIMES ' ' 12' ' 7 , 71.4
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & II 25 . '16 " . 56.3
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 19
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT PCA0665J
; HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
POTRERO TERRACE ANNEX
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS THIS LAST OFFENSE THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH LAST YR CHANGE DATE DATE CHANGE
HOMICIDE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 RAPE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 ROBBERY 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 1 0 N.A. 1 0 N.A. BURGLARY 1 3 -66.7 2 4 -50.0 LARCENY 1 1 0.0 3 2 50.0 GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE 1 1 0.0 2 6 -66.7 STOLEN VEHICLE 0 1 -100.0 1 1 0.0
TOTAL PART I CRIMES 4 6 -33.3 9 13 -30.8
OTHER ASSAULTS 1 1 0.0 1 1 0.0 ARSON 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. 0 0 0.0 : 0 0 0.0 VICE, PROSTITUTION 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OTHER SEX OFFENSES 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - OPIATES 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
• GAMBLING •• 0 0 • 0.0 • 0 0 0.0 OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 1 0 N.A. • 3 0 • N.A. LIQUOR LAWS 0 0 • 0.0 0 0 0.0
• DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1 0 N.A. • 1 0 N.A. JUVENILE OFFENSES 0 0 • 0.0 • 0 0 0.0 OTHER MUNI • S 0 0 00 0 • 0 0.0 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS 0 0 0.0 1 2 -50.0
TOTAL PART II CRIMES . 3 1 200.0 •
6 3 •. 100.0
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & 11 • 7 7 • 0.0 • 15 16 -6.3
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 20
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLCE DEPARTMENT PCA0665J
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
ROBERT PITTS .
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS THIS LAST OFFENSE THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH LAST YR CHANGE . DATE DATE CHANGE
HOMICIDE . 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 RAPE 0 .0 0.0 0 0 0.0 ROBBERY . 1 4 -75.0 3 5 -40.0 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 1 1 . 0.0 . 1 3 -66.7 BURGLARY . 2 1 100.0 5 4 25.0 LARCENY . 8 0.0 19 12 58.3 GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE. 10 7 42.9 .. 20 12 . 66.7 STOLEN VEHICLE . . 1 3 -66.7 4 5 -20.0
TOTAL PART I CRIMES 23 24 -4.2 . 52. 41 26.8
OTHER ASSAULTS 2 1 100.0 . 4 4 0.0 ARSON. 0 0 0.0 0 2 -100.0 FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT 1 0 N.A. 1 . 0 N.A. FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT . . 0 0 0.0. 0 . 0 . 0.0 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY 0 0 0.0 0. 0 . 0.0 .
WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. 0 0 0.0 0 0 . 0.0 VICE, PROSTITUTION 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OTHER SEX OFFENSES 0 1 -100.0 . 0 2 -100.0 NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA 1 0 N.A. 1 0 N.A. NARCOTICS - OPIATES 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS 0 0 0.0 0 1 .. -100.0 NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS 0 0 0.0 . . 0 1 -100.0 GAMBLING . 0 0 0.0 . 0 0 0.0 OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD 0 1 -100.0 . . 0 2 -100.0 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF . 5 2 . 150.0 . . 6 4 . 50.0 LIQUOR LAWS . . 0 . 0 0.0 0 0 . 0.0 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 3 ., 2 50.0 3 4 -25.0 JUVENILE OFFENSES . . . 0 . 1 . -100.0 1 1 0.0 OTHER HUNI 0 1 . . -100.0 0 1 -100.0 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS 2 - 1 100.0 . 2 _3 -33.3
TOTAL PART II CRIMES . 14 10 40.0. . 18 25. -28.0 .
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & j] 37 . 34 8.8 . 70 . 66 . 6.1
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 21
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
• S SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
PCAO665J
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
S U N N Y D A L E
• FEBRUARY • 2016
GRAND TOTAL PARTS 1 & 11
THIS THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE MONTH LAST YR CHANGE
0 0 0.0 O 0 0.0 1 2 -50.0 3 4 -25.0
1 1 0.0 0 , 0. 0.0 2 1 100.0 2 1 100.0
10 12
1 5 . -80.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0, 0 ' 0.0 0 0
, 0.0
1 • 1 0.0 0 0 0.0 o 0 0.0 0 • • 1 -10,0.0 0 . 0 0.0 0 • 0 0.0 0 0 • 0.0 0 0 • • 0.0 1 2 -50.0 2 . .4 -50.0 ••
'0 0 • 0.0 2 • 1 100.0' 0 0 0.0
'0 0 • 0.0' •
1 4 • • -75.0
8 18 • -55.6
18 . 30 -40.0
THIS LAST YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE DATE DATE CHANGE
0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1 4 -75.0 6 8 -25.0
,
2 5 , -60.0 4 . 6 0 0 , • 0.0 3 . 4 -25.0. 5 5
, 0.0
21 32 ' -34.4
5 9 -44.4' 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 o o 0.0 0 0 0.0 1 3 '. -66.7 2 0 . N.A. O 0 0.0 0 1 • -100.0 O 0 0.0 1. 1 . 0.0 0 0 0.0
'0 0 • 0.0 4 4 0.0 6 10 -40.0
• •0 0 0.0 3 3 0.0
•
1 0 N.A. 0 0 0.0 3 7 • -57.1
26 • 38 -31.6
• 47 70 • ' -32.9
OFFENSE • • CATEGORY
HOMICIDE RAPE ROBBERY AGGRAVATED ASSAULT BURGLARY LARCENY GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE STOLEN VEHICLE
TOTAL PART I CRIMES
OTHER ASSAULTS ARSON FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT. FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. VICE, PROSTITUTION OTHER SEX OFFENSES NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA NARCOTICS - OPIATES NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS GAMBLING OFFENSE.- FAMILY, CHILD MALICIOUS MISCHIEF LIQUOR LAWS DISORDERLY CONDUCT JUVENILE OFFENSES OTHER MUNI OTHER. MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL PART II CRIMES
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 22
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT PCA0665J
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
VALENCIA GARDENS
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS THIS LAST OFFENSE THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH.. LAST YR CHANGE DATE DATE CHANGE
HOMICIDE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 RAPE . . . . 0 . . 00 0 0 0.0 ROBBERY . 1 1, 0.0 4 4 0.0 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT . . ] . 0 N.A. 1 1 0.0 BURGLARY . . . 0 . 3 -100.0 . 1 5 -80.0 LARCENY . 12 . 6 100.0 27 18 50.0 GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED- VEHICLE . . 7 7 0.0 . 9 8 12.5 STOLEN VEHICLE .. . 4 1 300.0 6 5 20.0
TOTAL PART I CRIMES 25 18 38.9 . 48 41 17.1
OTHER ASSAULTS 4 S 33.3 6 6 0.0 ARSON . 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT . 0 . 0 0.0 0 1 -100.0 FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT . 0 1 -100.0 . 0. 1 -100.0 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY . 0 . 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
• WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. . 0 0 .0.0 . 0 1 - -100.0 •
. VICE, PROSTITUTION . 0 0 0.0. 0 0 0.0 • OTHER SEX OFFENSES . . 1 0 N.A. 1 0 N.A.
NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA . 0 0 • 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - OPIATES •:. 0 0 . 0.0 . 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS 0 .0 . 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS 0 0 . 0.0 0 2 -100.0 GAMBLING . . 0 0 .. 0.0 0 0 0.0 OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD 1 '. N.A. 1 0 N.A. MALICIOUS MISCHIEF . 3 •. 3 • 0.0 6 6 0.0 LIQUOR LAWS .. . .. 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 DISORDERLY CONDUCT . . 6 • 1 . -100.0 .1 2
• -50.0 JUVENILE OFFENSES . 0 . • 0 0.0 0 0 . . 0.0 OTHER MUNI • . . . . 0 0 0.0 . 0 0 • 0.0 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS . 1 . -. 1 . 0.0 . . 4 . 7 -42.9
TOTAL PART II CRIMES 10 9 11.1 19 26 -26.9
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & 11 • 35 • 27. 29.6 . 67 67 0.0
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 23
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT .. PA066J
HOUSXNG'PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
WESTSIDE COURTS
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS THIS LAST OFFENSE - THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH LAST YR • CHANGE DATE DATE CHANGE
HOMICIDE - 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 RAPE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 ROBBERY 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 BURGLARY 0 0 0.0 1 0 N.A. LARCENY 0 0 0.0 1 0 N.A. GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH : 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE 2 0 N.A. 3 0 N.A. STOLEN VEHICLE 0 0 0.0 . 0 0 . . 0.0
TOTAL PART I CRIMES 2 0 N.A. S N.A.
OTHER ASSAULTS .S N.A. 1 1 . 0.0 ARSON -. . 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT 1 0 . N.A. 1 0 N.A. FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 0 0 . 0.0 0 0 0.0 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY 0 0 . 0.0 0 0. 0.0
5.
WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. 0 0 0.0 . 0 0 0.0 VICE, PROSTITUTION 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OTHER SEX OFFENSES 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - OPIATES 0 0 0.0 0 •. 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 GAMBLING - . 0 0 - 0.0 . 0 . . 0 0.0 OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD 0 0 . . . 0.0 . 1 1 . 0.0 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF . . 0 . . 0 0.0 0 1 -100.0 LIQUOR LAWS . . 0 0 •. . 0.0 . 0 0 .. 0.0
• DISORDERLY CONDUCT • .5 0 • 0 • 0.0 • 0 0 •. 0.0 JUVENILE OFFENSES. • • 5 0 • 0 • •. 0.0 • . 0 0 0.0 • . .
• • OTHER MUNI • • • 5 0 • • : . • S 0 • 0.0 . • • .
OTHER MISCELLANEOUS • . 0 . 0 •.• 0.0 1 1. - 0.0 • ••
TOTAL PART II CRIMES • • 2 .. 0 . • N.A. • • : 4 4 • S • 0.0 . • •
GRAND TOTAL PARTS 1 & 11 4 0 N.A. 9 4 125.0
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 24
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT PCA0665J
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
409 HEAD
FEBRUARY 2016
THIS THIS LAST OFFENSE THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE CATEGORY MONTH LAST YR CHANGE BATE DATE CHANGE
HOMICIDE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 RAPE 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 ROBBERY 0 0 0.0 1 0 N.A. AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 BURGLARY 0 0 0.0 0 1 -100.0 LARCENY 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE 0 0 0.0 1 1 0.0 STOLEN VEHICLE 0 2 -100.0 1 3 -66.7
TOTAL PART I CRIMES 0 2 -100.0 3 5 -40.0
OTHER ASSAULTS . 1 0 N.A. 1 1 0.0 ARSON . 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT 1 0 N.A. 1 0 N.A. FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 0 1 -100.0 0 1 . -100.0 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. 0 0 0.0 0 1 -100.0 VICE, PROSTITUTION 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OTHER SEX OFFENSES 0 0 0.0 0 - 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA 1 0 N.A. - 2 0 N.A. NARCOTICS - OPIATES 0 0- 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 GAMBLING 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF •- 0 . 0 0.0 0 1 -100.0 LIQUOR LAWS - 0 0 . 0.0 0 0 0.0 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 0 0 0.0 - 0 0 0.0 JUVENILE OFFENSES . . 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 OTHER MUNI 0 - 0 0.0 . 0 0 0.0 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS 2 2 0.0 2 2 0.0
TOTAL PART II CRIMES . . S - 3 66.7 6 6 0.0
GRAND TOTAL PARTS 1 & 11 - --
_5 0.0 . 9. 11 -18.2
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 25
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
PCAO665J
HOUSING PROJECT OFFENSE REPORT
8TH AV AND GREAT HIGHWAY
FEBRUARY 2016
OFFENSE CATEGORY
GRAND TOTAL PARTS I & II
THIS THIS MONTH PERCENTAGE MONTH 'LAST YR CHANGE
o 0 0.0 0 ' 0 0.0 0 .0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0. 0 - 0.0
0 0.0 .0 0 0.0 0 1 -100.0 0' 0 0.0
0 1' -100.0
0 1• ' -100.0 0 U 0.0 0 0- 0.0
- 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 - 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0
, 0 0.0
0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0. 0.0 0 0 0.0, 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.O 0 0 - 0.0 o 0 0.0 0 1 ' -100.0
0 2 -100.0
0 ,. 3 -100.0
THIS LAST YR TO YR TO PERCENTAGE DATE DATE CHANGE
0 0 ' ' 0.0 0 ' 0 0.0 0 0' 0.0 0 1 ' -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 O 0 0.0 2 1 100.0 0 0 0.0
2 2 0.0
1 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0' ' 0.0 0 -. 0 ' 0.0' 0 - 0 0.0 0 0 0.0. 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0' 0.0 0 0 0.0 0
', 0 0.0
0 0 .0.0 .0 0,.0
.0 0 0.0 'O 0 0.0
0 1 -100.0 -
0 2 -100.0
2 4
HOMICIDE RAPE ROBBERY AGGRAVATED ASSAULT BURGLARY LARCENY GRAND THEFT PURSESNATCH THEFT FROM LOCKED VEHICLE STOLEN VEHICLE
TOTAL PART I CRIMES
OTHER ASSAULTS ARSON FORGERY AND COUNTERFEIT FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY WEAPONS, CARRYING, ETC. VICE, PROSTITUTION OTHER SEX OFFENSES NARCOTICS - MARIJUANA NARCOTICS - OPIATES NARCOTICS - DANGEROUS DRUGS NARCOTICS - OTHER DRUGS GAMBLING OFFENSE - FAMILY, CHILD MALICIOUS MISCHIEF LIQUOR LAWS DISORDERLY CONDUCT JUVENILE OFFENSES OTHER MUNI OTHER MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL PART II' CRIMES
4.A.a.1.a
Packet Pg. 26
Att
ach
men
t: S
FP
D O
ffen
se R
epo
rt-F
ebru
ary
2016
(13
62 :
SF
PD
Off
ense
Rep
ort
-Feb
ruar
y 20
16)
San Francisco Housing Authority (SFHA)
Rent Collection Analysis – March 2016
Presented to Resident Services, Operations and Personnel (RSOP) Committee
April 12, 2016
4.A.b.1.1.
Packet Pg. 27
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A_C
om
mit
tee
Pre
sen
tati
on
on
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n_M
arch
201
6 (
1359
: L
IPH
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n
2
Rent Collection Summary – Key Takeaways
Key Takeaways
• 94.77% of rent charged was collected for the month of March
2016, 91% in Feb. ,85% in Jan. 2016, 94% in Dec. 2015, 88% in
Nov. 2015 and 87% in Oct. 2015
• The average rent collection for Fiscal Year 2016 is 90%
• 49 legally blocked accounts as of March 31, 2016
4.A.b.1.1.
Packet Pg. 28
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A_C
om
mit
tee
Pre
sen
tati
on
on
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n_M
arch
201
6 (
1359
: L
IPH
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n
3
Rent Collection Summary
Month Summary: March 2016
Regular Rent Charges Rent Collections*Collection Percentage
February 2016
$1,215,314 $1,151,801 94.77%
4.A.b.1.1.
Packet Pg. 29
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A_C
om
mit
tee
Pre
sen
tati
on
on
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n_M
arch
201
6 (
1359
: L
IPH
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n
4
Rent Collection Summary Cont.
Development# of occupied
units
# of delinquent tenants as of the 11th of the month
No. of 14 Day Notices
Calls/Door Knocking
End of Month Delinquencies
Rent Percentage Collected
Alemany 150 14 48 0 n/a 90%
Westside Courts 122 9 43 0 0 109%
Westbrook 201 63 37 15 0 110%
1760 Bush Street 97 0 0 0 0 110%
Ping Yuen 221 138 2 5 0 100%
Ping Yuen North 191 7 4 7 0 110%
Rosa Parks/Joan San Jules
183 7 7 0 n/a 99%
Clementina 237 75 15 6 0 100%
JFK/California 123 6 6 0 n/a 92%
1750 McAllister 127 64 34 0 n/a 79%
3850 18th Street (Part of Lundy
Lane-AMP 982)101 7 7 0 n/a 96%
350 Ellis Street 73 0 0 0 n/a 99%
363 Noe (Part of Mission Dolores
AMP 980)96 3
3 (at Mission Dolores)
0 n/a 96%
4.A.b.1.1.
Packet Pg. 30
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A_C
om
mit
tee
Pre
sen
tati
on
on
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n_M
arch
201
6 (
1359
: L
IPH
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n
5
Rent Collection Summary Cont.
Development# of occupied
units
# of delinquent tenants as of
the 11th of the month
No. of 14 Day Notices
Calls/DoorKnocking
End of Month Delinquencies
Rent Percentage Collected
Hunters View 46 6 6 9 0 106%
Alice Griffith 209 83 65 24 n/a 91%
Sunnydale 739 162 162 10 n/a 84%
Potrero Annex 127 86 30 8 n/a 93%
Potrero Terrace 449 159 83 16 n/a 88%
4101 Noriega, Great Highway
and 48th
Avenue/Randolph (AMP 985)
40 35 35 0 n/a N/A
Total: 3,532 904 587 100 94.77%
4.A.b.1.1.
Packet Pg. 31
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A_C
om
mit
tee
Pre
sen
tati
on
on
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n_M
arch
201
6 (
1359
: L
IPH
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n
Rent Collection Summary Cont.
6
Prior Months No. of 14 Day Notices
Calls/Door Knocking
End of Month Delinquencies
Rent Percentage Collected
February 2016 780 103 - 91%
January 2016 780 39 - 85%
December 2015 633 - - 94%
4.A.b.1.1.
Packet Pg. 32
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A_C
om
mit
tee
Pre
sen
tati
on
on
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n_M
arch
201
6 (
1359
: L
IPH
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n
7
Rent Reconciliation Summary
Reconciliation Summary – March 2016
RAD Phase I
Reconciliation
RAD Phase II
Reconciliation
RAD Phase I EIV
Submission
Completed - 423 Files
• McAllister Completed , 22
Files
• Westbrook Completed,115
Files
• Ping Yuen Completed, 35
Files
• Westside in progress, 47
Files
• Alemany in progress,109 files
Completed
4.A.b.1.1.
Packet Pg. 33
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A_C
om
mit
tee
Pre
sen
tati
on
on
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n_M
arch
201
6 (
1359
: L
IPH
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n
QUESTIONS?
8
4.A.b.1.1.
Packet Pg. 34
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A_C
om
mit
tee
Pre
sen
tati
on
on
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n_M
arch
201
6 (
1359
: L
IPH
Ren
t C
olle
ctio
n
San Francisco Housing Authority (SFHA)
Occupancy Analysis – Developed with Data from March 31 st, 2016
Presented to Resident Services , Operations and Personnel ( RSOP) Committee
April 12th , 2016
4.A.b.2.1.
Packet Pg. 35
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A P
H R
epo
rtin
g -
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is M
arch
201
6 (
1357
: L
IPH
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is)
Occupancy Report – All Properties 3
Occupancy Report – Cont.4
SFHA Form HUD-50058 Monthly Submission Rates5
SFHA Form HUD-50058 Monthly Submission Rates Cont.6
SFHA Form HUD-50058 Monthly Submission Rates Cont.7
Table of Contents
2
4.A.b.2.1.
Packet Pg. 36
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A P
H R
epo
rtin
g -
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is M
arch
201
6 (
1357
: L
IPH
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is)
Occupancy Report – All Properties
3
CategoryAs of 2/29/2016
Total
As of 3/31/2016
Total % Change
Non- RAD
As of 3/31/2016
Total Units 4,609 4,609 1431
Total Vacant Units 262 271 3.4 51
Total Occupied Units 4,347 4,338 (-.20) 1380
Occupancy Rate 94.32% 94.12% -.21) 96.52%
PHAS Score (out of 16) 8.75 8.67 (-0.91)
SFHA PropertiesOccupancy Rate – 96.52%
RAD PropertiesOccupancy Rate – 93.00%
100 100 100 99 99 98 98 98 97 97 94 91 91 91 90 90 90 90 87 85 8577
100 100 100 100 99 97 9489
0
Hu
nte
rs V
iew
Val
enci
a G
ard
ens
Ber
nal
l Dw
ellin
gs
Pla
za E
ast
Pin
g Yu
en N
ort
h
Hay
es V
alle
y So
uth
Hay
es V
alle
y N
ort
h
Pin
g Yu
en
Ale
man
y
No
rth
Bea
ch
3850
-18
th/2
55
Do
rlan
d
Mis
sio
n D
olo
res
Ro
sa P
arks
Ap
ts.
Ken
ned
y To
wer
s
Wes
tsid
e C
ou
rts
Wes
tbro
ok
Ap
ts.
1760
Bu
sh S
t.
1750
McA
llist
er S
t.
320
/330
Cle
men
tin
a
Alic
e G
riff
ith
2698
Cal
ifo
rnia
St.
350
Elli
s St
.
Joan
San
Ju
le A
pts
.
363
No
e St
.
4101
No
rieg
a St
Gre
at H
igh
way
Po
trer
o T
erra
ce
Sun
nyd
ale
602-
642
Vel
asco
Po
trer
o A
nn
ex
10
1 &
103
Lu
nd
y La
ne
974 991 962 963 976 961 960 972 966 990 982 980 978 984 969 970 977 985 983 975 984 981 978 980 985 985 967 968 968 971 982
Occupancy 94.12 %
Occupancy Data: All Properties- 3/31/2016
4.A.b.2.1.
Packet Pg. 37
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A P
H R
epo
rtin
g -
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is M
arch
201
6 (
1357
: L
IPH
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is)
Occupancy Report – Cont.
4
Unit Data Summary – For the Month of March 2016
Units Made Ready New Vacant UnitsVacant Units Ready for
LeasingTotal Vacancies
0 13 1 271
4.A.b.2.1.
Packet Pg. 38
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A P
H R
epo
rtin
g -
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is M
arch
201
6 (
1357
: L
IPH
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is)
SFHA Form HUD- 50058 Monthly Submission Rate
5
Submission Rate - FY 2015 –Fy 2016
Months Meeting Minimum HUD Submission Rate Fy 16 Months Not Meeting Minimum HUD Submission Rate Fy 16
0 6
94.5 %
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
2015 2016Month
SFHA's Form HUD-50058 Submission Rate
4.A.b.2.1.
Packet Pg. 39
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A P
H R
epo
rtin
g -
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is M
arch
201
6 (
1357
: L
IPH
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is)
SFHA's Form HUD-50058 Submission Rate Cont.
6
Year Month End Reporting Rate HUD Minimum Reporting Rate
2015 Oct 91.39 95.0
Nov 84.48 95.0
Dec 89.91 95.0
2016 Jan 92.07 95.0
Feb 91.53 95.0
Mar 92.06 95.0
4.A.b.2.1.
Packet Pg. 40
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A P
H R
epo
rtin
g -
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is M
arch
201
6 (
1357
: L
IPH
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is)
SFHA's Form HUD-50058 Submission Rate Cont
7
AMP and Property # Delinquent Reexams # Due Reexams
960 Hayes Valley North 0 7961 Hayes Valley South 0 3
962 Bernal Dwellings 2 10
963 Plaza East 2 28
966 Alemany 10 18967 Potrero Terrace 26 20
968 Sunnydale/Velasco 196 83
969 Westside Courts 18 14
970 Westbrook 1 7971 Potrero Annex 9 7
972 Ping Yuen 1 0
974 Hunters View 5 4
975 Alice Griffith 14 3
976 Ping Yuen North 0 0977 Bush 0 23
978 Rosa Parks 2 0
980 Mission Dolores 6 3
981 350 Ellis 5 3982 Lundy/18th St 0 5
983 Clementina 1 0
984 California/JFK 25 15
985 Randolph/McAllister/etc 12 5990 North Beach 0 0
991 Valencia Gardens 0 2TOTAL 335 260
4.A.b.2.1.
Packet Pg. 41
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A P
H R
epo
rtin
g -
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is M
arch
201
6 (
1357
: L
IPH
Occ
up
ancy
An
alys
is)
San Francisco Housing Authority (SFHA)
LIPH Work Order Report – March 31, 2016
Presented to Resident Services, Operations and Personnel (RSOP) Committee
April 12th, 2016
4.A.b.3.1.
Packet Pg. 42
Att
ach
men
t: L
IPH
wo
rk o
rder
pre
sen
tati
on
fo
r M
arch
201
6 (
1358
: L
IPH
Wo
rk O
rder
Rep
ort
fo
r M
arch
)
2
Work Order Summary
Work Orders – As of 3/31/2016
Open work orders as of 3 /31 /2016 1,224
Work orders that have been open for less than 30 days 1,145
Work orders that have been open for 30 days or greater 79
emergency work orders totals , as of 3/31/2016, are Included in
total work orders open for less than 30 day27
4.A.b.3.1.
Packet Pg. 43
Att
ach
men
t: L
IPH
wo
rk o
rder
pre
sen
tati
on
fo
r M
arch
201
6 (
1358
: L
IPH
Wo
rk O
rder
Rep
ort
fo
r M
arch
)
4.A.b.3.1.
Packet Pg. 44
Att
ach
men
t: L
IPH
wo
rk o
rder
pre
sen
tati
on
fo
r M
arch
201
6 (
1358
: L
IPH
Wo
rk O
rder
Rep
ort
fo
r M
arch
)
4.A.b.3.1.
Packet Pg. 45
Att
ach
men
t: L
IPH
wo
rk o
rder
pre
sen
tati
on
fo
r M
arch
201
6 (
1358
: L
IPH
Wo
rk O
rder
Rep
ort
fo
r M
arch
)
4.A.b.3.1.
Packet Pg. 46
Att
ach
men
t: L
IPH
wo
rk o
rder
pre
sen
tati
on
fo
r M
arch
201
6 (
1358
: L
IPH
Wo
rk O
rder
Rep
ort
fo
r M
arch
)
4.A.b.3.1.
Packet Pg. 47
Att
ach
men
t: L
IPH
wo
rk o
rder
pre
sen
tati
on
fo
r M
arch
201
6 (
1358
: L
IPH
Wo
rk O
rder
Rep
ort
fo
r M
arch
)
San Francisco Housing Authority (SFHA)
Monthly Update – Client Placement
Prepared Tuesday, April 05, 2016
1
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 48
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Waiting Lists Summary
2
Housing Choice Vouchers 494
Public Housing 16,412
Dr. Davis Senior Homes 3,893
PH Emergency Transfers 288
Totals As Of Tuesday, April 5, 2016
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 49
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Housing Choice Voucher Statistics
3
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 50
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Public Housing Statistics
4
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 51
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Dr. George Davis Senior Homes Statistics
5
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 52
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
PH Emergency Transfers Statistics
6
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 53
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Current Activities
• Housing Choice Voucher Lease-up Activities
32 - HCV Vouchers Issued from Waiting List
69 – HCV Vouchers to PBV Participants
09 – FUP Vouchers
HCV Interview Date: Friday, March 4th (200 Invitations)
121 – No Show
79 – Showed
48 – Back to Waiting List
31 - Processing
HCV Interview Date: Wednesday, March 9th (402 Invitations)
274 – No Show
128 – Showed
20 – Back to Waiting List
108 - Processing
HCV Interview Date: Friday, March 18th (249 Invitations)
150 – No Show
99 – Showed
19 – Back to Waiting List
80 - Processing
HCV Interview Date: Wednesday, March 23rd (200 Invitations)
126 – No Show
74 – Showed
7 – Back to Waiting List
67 - Processing
Next Scheduled Appointment: Wednesday, April 6th and Wednesday, April 13th
7
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 54
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Current Activities (con’t)• HUD VASH Lease-up
– Participating in the Weekly SF VA Jamboree
– Weekly Meeting with SF Homes for Heroes Group
– 118 Vouchers on the Street
• Dr. Davis Senior Center Lease-up (April 2016 – 120 Units)
Verifying Preferences : Elderly Of Alice Griffith, Bay view COP, Western Addition COP
24 – Certified Elderly of Alice Griffith Residents
11 – SFHA Eligible
7 – Not Interested In Dr. Davis Senior Homes
3 – Back to Waiting List
2 - Processing
100 – COP Sent to MOHCD for Certification (additional 6 pending)25 – Certified Bay View COP
21 – Certified Western Addition COP
48 – Not COP Holders
• Non-Disclosure Agreement Executed, Monday, March 28th (SFHA / MOHCD / OCII)
• Next Preferences being Verified: Emergency Transfers and Rent Burdened / Assisted Housing
8
# Additional Information
Referred To McCormack Baron
22 10 AG, 12 BV COP
3/11 – 06
3/15 – 09
03/25 – (-04 not 62 years old)
03/25 – 07
04/01 - 04
Processing 18 3 AG, 4 BV COP, 11 WA COP
DAH Referrals Received 5 Processing
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 55
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Current Activities (con’t)
• San Francisco Moving On Initiative – DHS & DPH Permanent & Supportive Housing
• Criteria and Procedures Developed(see attached)
• Setting up WebApp Portal w/ Agent Code(s)
– DHS Shelters
• Criteria Being Developed (DHS Draft by April 28th)
9
Moving On Process for Permanent Supportive Housing Tenants
Getting on the Waitlist:The SFHA Waitlist will be open on an ongoing basis for PSH Tenants and SF Shelter Participants.
Step 1: Complete Household Preference Validation Packet
PSH Tenant Households
• Households, who are not yet on the SFHA waitlist, are encouraged to reach out to their PSH Housing Provider – both property management and supportive services staff – to review and complete the paperwork for the Moving On Process, and to engage PSH staff for support during the Process. o Release of Information Formo Moving On PSH Tenant Eligibility Criteriao PSH Tenant Preference Validation Form
• PSH staff will need to validate that the household meets the preference criteria according to the PSH Tenant Eligibility Criteria.
Step 2: Paperwork is Submitted to SFHA
PSH Tenant Households
• Household submits documentation, including Release of Information form in order to initiate Third-Party Preference Validation process, to SFHA as instructed.
• The household waits for confirmation of PSH Tenant Preference validation with placement on SFHA site-specific waitlist from SFHA. The household can check their SFHA waitlist account via the online portal(using their email address).
Step 3: SFHA Verifies, Places Household in Waitlist & Assigns Preference Points
PSH Tenant Households
• SFHA will mail the PSH Tenant Validation Form directly to the PSH Housing Provider’s property management and supportive services staff with instructions on how to complete.
• The PSH Housing Provider will fill out and submit the paperwork to SFHA as instructed.
• SFHA will confirm receipt of the Third-Party PSH Tenant Validation Form and will review.
• If the documents cannot be verified for minor errors (incomplete, inaccurate, etc.) the paperwork will be returned to the PSH Housing Provider and they can re-submit the paperwork within 10 calendardays from receipt of the returned paperwork.
• If it is found that the household does not meet the PSH Tenant Eligibility Criteria, the household will not be added to site-specific SFHA waitlists, and will not receive +7 preference points.
• If it is found that the household does meet the PSH Tenant Eligibility Criteria, the household will be added to site-specific SFHA waitlists, and will receive +7 preference points.
• Per standard practice, SFHA will send a Notification Letter to households once they have been added to the SFHA waitlists. Households can also check their waitlist status via SFHA’s online portal(using their email address).
• Once the household receives notification from SFHA that they have been placed on site-specificwaitlists, they will await notification of unit availability.
NOTE: The following steps are a direct copy of Part I’s Moving On process, starting with Step 3
(renamed Step 4).
Notice of Unit Availability & Updated Validation Confirmation
Step 4: Unit Availability Notification
PSH Tenant Households
• When an appropriate SFHA unit becomes available, SFHA will outreach to households who are high on the site-specific waiting list – including PSH Tenants on the waiting list.
• PSH Tenants who are high on the waitlist will be contacted by SFHA via a mailed Unit Availability Package that contains:o Information about available SFHA unito Instructions to schedule an Initial Eligibility Interviewo Notification of what to prepare and bring to the Interview
Step 5: Household Decides What to Do
PSH Tenant HouseholdsHouseholds
who DO wish to
pursue the available
unit
• If the household DOES want to pursue the available unit, they should notify SFHA to schedule Initial Eligibility Interview as soon as possible.
• Additionally, PSH Tenant are encouraged to notify their PSH Housing Provider – both property management and supportive services staff – to determine whether they meet the preference criteria according to the PSH Tenant Eligibility Criteria, and engage PSH staff for support during the Moving On Process.
Households who DO
NOT wish to pursue
the available
unit
• If the household DOES NOT want to pursue the available unit or they do not think they will meet the preference criteria, they may choose to ignore the SFHA notice.
o Households will likely remain on the waitlist with +7 preference pointso Please note: PSH Tenants will have already identified site-specific waiting lists
for which to be added. So, the PSH Tenant should only be offered available units in properties where they identified an interest.
o If the PSH Tenant does not think they will meet the preference criteria, they are encouraged to reach out to their PSH Housing Provider – both property management and supportive services staff – to develop a workplan for improving their eligibility for the Moving On Process.
o Households may choose to pursue another available unit in the future once they receive another unit availability notification from SFHA.
• If the household DOES NOT want to pursue the available unit, they may refuse the available unit. Their refusal will likely result in the withdrawal of their +7 preference points. However, the household will likely remain on the waiting list.
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 56
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Current Activities (con’t)
• Establishment of Site-Based Waiting Lists• PBV
Open to Public
30 – 35 Lists
14 day (Web-based) Application period beginning Tuesday, May 3rd, 2016
Public Notice:Community Based Organizations
SF City Departments
San Francisco Chronicle
SFHA Website
ALL SFHA Property Offices
ALL RAD Property Offices
• RAD Open to Public Housing Waiting List Applicants (16,000+)
Phase I / II Sites & HOPE SF - Hunters View & Alice Griffith (30 Lists)
30 Day (Paper) Application period beginning Monday, May 9th, 2016
Open to PH Emergency Transfer Applicants (300+)
Open to Public, if needed
10
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 57
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Current Activities (con’t)
• RAD Emergency Referral Policysee attached
• RAD Waiting List Referral Procedures see attached
11
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 58
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Mail Room
Incoming Mail:
Sorted For Entire Agency Delivered to ALL 1815 Egbert Avenue Employees
Picked up by Field Staff
Outgoing Mail (per postage machine):
Month of March 2016 9,065 Pieces
12
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 59
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Customer Care
Established Wednesday, July 30, 2014
(415) [email protected]
Answer phones 3,500 + Calls
Address emailed issues 3,900 + Emails
General Information (Rent Increases, Waiting List, Public Housing Operations, HUD, Rent Stabilization, Referrals to outside Agencies)
13
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 60
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Questions
14
4.A.c.1.a
Packet Pg. 61
Att
ach
men
t: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate
2016
03
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Criteria for Supportive Housing Tenant Referrals to the SFHA Homeless Waiting List
Applicants must meet the following minimum qualifications to be referred to the SFHA Homeless Waiting List: Must be a resident of a qualified Housing First Masterlease Supportive Housing
building for 12 or more consecutive months at the date of referral
Must be a previously homeless individual or family who is no longer in need of
supportive services (to be determined)
Must be current on rent
Must not have had a court ordered Pay & Stay with a start date within 12 months
of the referral date
May have had a maximum of one payment plan within the past 12 months for a circumstance that was beyond the tenant’s control (i.e. a benefit change or hospitalization
Must not have any written lease violations within the past 12 months for
egregious behavior (i.e. violence, threats, destruction of property or harassment)
May have 2 or fewer lease violations in the past 12 months for non-egregious behavior (i.e. minor noise or visitor violations). Tenants must attach the written warning/s and a written explanation for the behavior and the steps he/she has taken to prevent this from occurring again for consideration
Must not have failed any room inspections within 12 months of the referral date
4.A.c.1.b
Packet Pg. 62
Att
ach
men
t: H
om
eles
s W
aiti
ng
Lis
t In
itia
tive
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Moving On Process for Permanent Supportive Housing Tenants
Getting on the Waitlist: The SFHA Waitlist will be open on an ongoing basis for PSH Tenants and SF Shelter Participants.
Step 1: Complete Household Preference Validation Packet
PSH Tenant Households
Households, who are not yet on the SFHA waitlist, are encouraged to reach out to their PSH Housing Provider – both property management and supportive services staff – to review and complete the paperwork for the Moving On Process, and to engage PSH staff for support during the Process. o Release of Information Form o Moving On PSH Tenant Eligibility Criteria o PSH Tenant Preference Validation Form
PSH staff will need to validate that the household meets the preference criteria according to the PSH Tenant Eligibility Criteria.
Step 2: Paperwork is Submitted to SFHA
PSH Tenant Households
Household submits documentation, including Release of Information form in order to initiate Third-Party Preference Validation process, to SFHA as instructed.
The household waits for confirmation of PSH Tenant Preference validation with placement on SFHA site-specific waitlist from SFHA. The household can check their SFHA waitlist account via the online portal (using their email address).
Step 3: SFHA Verifies, Places Household in Waitlist & Assigns Preference Points
PSH Tenant Households
SFHA will mail the PSH Tenant Validation Form directly to the PSH Housing Provider’s property management and supportive services staff with instructions on how to complete.
The PSH Housing Provider will fill out and submit the paperwork to SFHA as instructed.
SFHA will confirm receipt of the Third-Party PSH Tenant Validation Form and will review.
If the documents cannot be verified for minor errors (incomplete, inaccurate, etc.) the paperwork will be returned to the PSH Housing Provider and they can re-submit the paperwork within 10 calendar days from receipt of the returned paperwork.
If it is found that the household does not meet the PSH Tenant Eligibility Criteria, the household will not be added to site-specific SFHA waitlists, and will not receive +7 preference points.
If it is found that the household does meet the PSH Tenant Eligibility Criteria, the household will be added to site-specific SFHA waitlists, and will receive +7 preference points.
Per standard practice, SFHA will send a Notification Letter to households once they have been added to the SFHA waitlists. Households can also check their waitlist status via SFHA’s online portal (using their email address).
Once the household receives notification from SFHA that they have been placed on site-specific waitlists, they will await notification of unit availability.
4.A.c.1.c
Packet Pg. 63
Att
ach
men
t: D
HS
DP
H M
ovi
ng
On
Pro
cess
- S
FH
A W
aiti
ng
Lis
t (
1356
: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate)
NOTE: The following steps are a direct copy of Part I’s Moving On process, starting with Step 3
(renamed Step 4).
Notice of Unit Availability & Updated Validation Confirmation
Step 4: Unit Availability Notification
PSH Tenant Households
When an appropriate SFHA unit becomes available, SFHA will outreach to households who are high on the site-specific waiting list – including PSH Tenants on the waiting list.
PSH Tenants who are high on the waitlist will be contacted by SFHA via a mailed Unit Availability Package that contains: o Information about available SFHA unit o Instructions to schedule an Initial Eligibility Interview o Notification of what to prepare and bring to the Interview
Step 5: Household Decides What to Do
PSH Tenant Households
Households who DO wish to
pursue the available
unit
If the household DOES want to pursue the available unit, they should notify SFHA to schedule Initial Eligibility Interview as soon as possible.
Additionally, PSH Tenant are encouraged to notify their PSH Housing Provider – both property management and supportive services staff – to determine whether they meet the preference criteria according to the PSH Tenant Eligibility Criteria, and engage PSH staff for support during the Moving On Process.
Households who DO
NOT wish to pursue
the available
unit
If the household DOES NOT want to pursue the available unit or they do not think they will meet the preference criteria, they may choose to ignore the SFHA notice.
o Households will likely remain on the waitlist with +7 preference points o Please note: PSH Tenants will have already identified site-specific waiting lists
for which to be added. So, the PSH Tenant should only be offered available units in properties where they identified an interest.
o If the PSH Tenant does not think they will meet the preference criteria, they are encouraged to reach out to their PSH Housing Provider – both property management and supportive services staff – to develop a workplan for improving their eligibility for the Moving On Process.
o Households may choose to pursue another available unit in the future once they receive another unit availability notification from SFHA.
If the household DOES NOT want to pursue the available unit, they may refuse the available unit. Their refusal will likely result in the withdrawal of their +7 preference points. However, the household will likely remain on the waiting list.
Step 6: Initial Eligibility Interview & Paperwork Submission
PSH Tenant Households
4.A.c.1.c
Packet Pg. 64
Att
ach
men
t: D
HS
DP
H M
ovi
ng
On
Pro
cess
- S
FH
A W
aiti
ng
Lis
t (
1356
: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate)
Household schedules and attends their Initial Eligibility Interview with SFHA, bringing with them required documentation as instructed.
Household submits documentation, including Release of Information form in order to initiate Third-Party Preference Validation process, to SFHA as instructed in the unit availability notice.
SFHA receives and confirms documentation. If all documents are confirmed, the household will be invited to apply for the unit, and referred to the
Private Owner.
If the documents cannot be verified (incomplete, inaccurate, etc.), the household will be notified and the household can re-submit the paperwork within 10 calendar days after receipt of the returned paperwork.
o After this time, SFHA will consider the household’s non-response as an indication that the household has declined to proceed with the Moving On Process.
o After this deadline, the household will lose their opportunity for this available unit, but they will likely remain on the waitlist with +7 preference points.
Households are encouraged to communicate regularly with their PSH Housing Provider – both property management and supportive services staff – to ensure all documents (particularly Third-Party PSH Tenant Validation Form) are in order before they are submitted.
Step 7: Third-Party Confirmation of PSH Tenant Validation
PSH Tenant Households
SFHA will mail the PSH Tenant Validation Form directly to the PSH Housing Provider’s property management and supportive services staff with instructions on how to complete.
The PSH Housing Provider will fill out and submit the paperwork to SFHA as instructed. SFHA will confirm receipt of the Third-Party PSH Tenant Validation Form and will review.
If the documents cannot be verified for minor errors (incomplete, inaccurate, etc.) the paperwork will be returned to the PSH Housing Provider and they can re-submit the paperwork within 10 calendar days from receipt of the returned paperwork.
If it is found that the household no longer meets the PSH Tenant Eligibility Criteria, that household will lose their +7 preference points, but will likely remain on SFHA waitlists. The household can attempt to regain their +7 preference points once their PSH Housing Provider can validate that they indeed meet the PSH Tenant Eligibility Criteria.
Unit Application Process
Step 8: Household Verification & Invitation to Apply (Referral to Private Owner)
PSH Tenant Households
After fully verifying documentation and determining the household’s eligibility for the available housing opportunity, SFHA will invite the household to engage in the application process – and refer the household to the Private Owner.
SFHA will send a Notice to Apply for Unit Packet to the PSH Tenant with instructions on how to complete the application process.
The household is encouraged to notify their PSH Housing Provider – both property management and supportive services staff – and engage PSH staff for support during the Moving On Process.
4.A.c.1.c
Packet Pg. 65
Att
ach
men
t: D
HS
DP
H M
ovi
ng
On
Pro
cess
- S
FH
A W
aiti
ng
Lis
t (
1356
: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate)
Step 9: Household Qualified to Apply to Private Owner for Available Unit
PSH Tenant Households
Households who wish to ACCEPT
the unit invitation
If the household ACCEPTS the invitation to apply to the Private Owner of the available unit, the household will complete the application process as instructed.
The household is encouraged to engage their PSH Housing Provider – both property management and supportive services staff – for support during the Moving On Process.
The household will submit their application to the Private Owner as instructed.
Households who wish
to DECLINE the unit
invitation
If the household DECLINES the invitation to apply to the Private Owner for the available unit, that household will notify the Private Owner and SFHA in writing as instructed.
o Please note: PSH Tenant will have already identified site-specific waiting lists for which to be added. So, the PSH Tenant should only be offered available units in properties where they identified an interest.
The household’s refusal of the available unit will likely result in the withdrawal of their +7 preference points. However, the household will likely remain on SFHA waiting list.
Private Owner’s Screening Process & Lease-Up Process
Step 10: SFHA Application Verification
PSH Tenant Households:
Once a household has successfully completed and submitted the application paperwork for an available housing unit, SFHA will send a referral letter to the Private Owner.
If the application is verified, SFHA will send a Confirmation Notice to the household, which includes instructions for the lease-up process with the Private Owner.
If the application cannot be verified (incomplete, inaccurate, etc.) the household will be notified and the household can re-submit the application within 10 calendar days from receipt of the notice.
o After this time, SFHA will consider the household’s non-response as an indication that the household has declined to proceed with the Moving On Process.
o After this deadline, the household will lose their opportunity for this available unit. However, they will likely remain on the waitlist with +7 preference points.
Step 11: Household Engages in Lease-Up Activities
PSH Tenant Households
Once a household receives confirmation from SFHA that their application has been accepted, the household will undergo lease-up activities with the Private Owner.
Households are encouraged to notify their PSH Housing Provider – both property management and supportive services staff – and engage PSH staff for support during the Moving On Process.
The household and the new Private Owner Landlord will sign the lease after lease-up activities are completed.
If at some point in the lease-up process the household is rejected for the housing opportunity (by the Private Owner due to behavior, background checks, etc.), the household will likely lose this housing opportunity and their +7 preference points. However, they will likely remain on SFHA waitlists. The household can attempt to regain their +7 preference points when their PSH Housing Provider can
4.A.c.1.c
Packet Pg. 66
Att
ach
men
t: D
HS
DP
H M
ovi
ng
On
Pro
cess
- S
FH
A W
aiti
ng
Lis
t (
1356
: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate)
validate that they meet the PSH Tenant Eligibility Criteria.
Step 12: Household Terminates Their Current PSH Unit Occupancy
PSH Tenant Households
Once the household and the new Private Owner have signed the lease, the household should reach out to their PSH Housing Provider to give notice and terminate their PSH tenancy.
Step 13: Household Moves Into the SFHA unit
PSH Tenant Households
The household will prepare to move out of PSH and move into the SFHA Private Owner unit.
The household is encouraged to engage their PSH Housing Provider – both property management and supportive services staff – for support with their transition from PSH to the SFHA Private Owner unit.
4.A.c.1.c
Packet Pg. 67
Att
ach
men
t: D
HS
DP
H M
ovi
ng
On
Pro
cess
- S
FH
A W
aiti
ng
Lis
t (
1356
: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t U
pd
ate)
P a g e | 1
San Francisco Housing Authority Client Placement Department
Applicant Referral PBV – Administrative Plan 17-VI.F RAD – Administrative Plan 18: Applicant Referrals to RAD Properties Standard Operating Procedures
1 Owner One day Day 1
Owner
2 SFHA Receipt
sent with
24 hours
of form
Day 2
3 SFHA Contacts
sent
within 3-
5
business
days
Day 3 - 8
4 Owner 1-2
Weeks
Day 10 - 22
5 Owner Day 40 - 64
SFHA Within same
4-6 week
period
Owner
SFHA Within same
4-6 week
period
6 Owner 1 week
(see
appeal
process
below)
Day 47 - 71
7 SFHA 1 week Same 1 week
time
Household information,
Rent levels, and
ADA Information, Unit #
8 Owner After
outcome
form
appeal
period is
over?
Day 54 - 78
9 Appeals and Grievance
9a Applicant 10 day
period
Day 47 - 81
9b Owner Up to 10
days
Day 57 - 91
9c Owner Up to 10
days
Day 67 - 101
9d Applicant 10 day
period
Day 77 - 111
9e Owner 5 - 10
days
Day 82 - 121
9f Hearing
Officer
Up to 10
days
Day 92 - 131
10 Applicant moves in Applicant Schedule
with
applicant
Day 68 - 92
11 Selected applicant is removed from ALL other site based waitlists SFHA After
move-in
Day 69 - 93
Applicant Ongoing
12 Family Briefing SFHA Before
Move-in
Day 47 - 54
PBV/RAD Manager issues decision within 10 business days of
the hearing
After informal hearing decision is issues, the applicant may
avail themselves of a formal hearing. After receiving informal
PBV/RAD Manager schedules the hearing within 10 business
days, giving at least 5 business days' notice to the applicant
Hearing officer must send written decision to all parties
within 10 business days of the formal hearing
SFHA sends PBV/RAD Managers a final referral letter [By
when?], including—
Note: Reasonable Accommodations will be taken into consideration throughout the application process. Note: Fair Chance
Upon receiving an outcome letter, an applicant may avail
themselves of the appeal process. After receiving outcome
PBV/RAD Manager schedules the hearing within 10 business
days
Applicant Referral
PBV/RAD Managers will review all documents and
SFHA will confirm receipt of updated criminal and
income information within 3 business days
PBV/RAD manager sends outcome form to SFHA for all five
applicants [By when?]
PBV/RAD Manager sends a move-in letter to the selected
applicant (on a first qualified, first offered basis)
PBV/RAD Manager will seek to maintain list
position in offer process if possible
Applicant can be put on transfer waitlist after
move-in through transfer policy
PBV/RAD Manager submits to SFHA a request for an applicant
This happens immediately after receiving a 30-day
“Notice of Intent to Vacate”
SFHA sends form receipt to PBV/RAD manager
SFHA sends PBV/RAD manager names and contact
information of five pre-qualified applicants (in order of List
Position)
PBV/RAD Manager sends out a letter to all five applicants and
makes appointments (to occur within 1-2 weeks)
During this time, SFHA will run criminal
background checks again if previously run checks
have become stale (SFHA will determine whether
PBV/RAD Manager screening process occurs (over a 4- to 6-
week period)
4.A.c.1.d
Packet Pg. 68
Att
ach
men
t: S
OP
Ap
plic
ant
Ref
erra
l PB
VR
AD
201
6 03
16
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
P a g e | 2
San Francisco Housing Authority Client Placement Department
PBV/RAD Manager Requests Referrals Step 1
The PBV/RAD Manager complete and provide a Referral Request Form (Attachment A) for both current and future vacant units (with projected completion date). Requests must be sent to [email protected].
The Referral Request Form Includes:
Landlord Details
Vacant Unit Details (Address, Apartment #, Income Requirement, Type, Bedrooms, Bathrooms, Projected
Move-in Date)
ADA Information (Wheelchair Accessibility, Roll-in Shower, Hearing/Visual)
Additional Information
SFHA Receipt of Referral Request Step 2
The Client Placement Department will receive Referral Request Form from the PBV/RAD Manger and provides ‘Receipt of Request’ via email.
SFHA Referrals Sent To Manager Step 3
In filling an actual or expected vacancy, SFHA must offer the unit to an applicant in the appropriate sequence from that PBV/RAD Site-Based Waiting List. SFHA will send five qualified applicants in order of List Position on the Site-Based Waiting List Referral Form (Attachment B).
PBV/RAD Manager Sets Appointment for Five (05) SFHA Referrals Step 4
PBV/RAD Manager sends out letters to ALL five applicants and schedules appointments.
PBV/RAD/PBV Manager Screening Process Step 5
The applicants are screened in accordance with the specific program regulations by the PBV/RAD Manger. Applicants will be processed in the List Position order as applicable.
PBV/RAD Manager Sends Outcome of Applicants Step 6
PBV/RAD Manager completes outcome portion of Referral Request Form and returns to SFHA.
Outcomes Codes:
A - In Process
F - Ineligible - Eviction Screening
B - Did not apply
G - Ineligible - Rental History
C - Applicant Withdrew Application to Building H - Denied - Unresponsive
D - Ineligible - Over Income
I - Return to SFHA
E - Ineligible - Criminal Screening
J - Other
NOTE: Send completed Request for Tenancy Approval (RFTA) (Attachment C) Form to SFHA to schedule HQS
Inspection.
Ou
tco
me
Additional Referral Needed:
p Yes p No
p Applicant Housed
Move-In Date: ___________________________
Unit:_____________________________________
p Applicant NOT Housed
A B C D E F G H I J
Date: ___________________________________________
COMMENTS:______________________________________________
4.A.c.1.d
Packet Pg. 69
Att
ach
men
t: S
OP
Ap
plic
ant
Ref
erra
l PB
VR
AD
201
6 03
16
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
P a g e | 3
San Francisco Housing Authority Client Placement Department
SFHA sends Final Referral Letter to PBV/RAD Manager Step 7
SFHA sends a Referral Letter (Attachment D) to PBV/RAD applicant and PBV/RAD Manager; which includes approved family members, Tenant rent portion, Preference, Bedroom Size, and SFHA approval date.
PBV/RAD Manager Sends Move-In or Denial Letter to Applicant Step 8
The Selected Applicant the Move-In Letter; which includes Move-in Date, Unit Assignment, etc.
Appeals and Grievance Step 9
The PBV/RAD Manager must offer an Appeal Process for certain determinations relating to the individual circumstances of an Applicant family. The purpose of the Appeal is to consider whether the PBV/RAD Manager’s decisions related to the family’s circumstances are in accordance with the law, HUD regulations and PBV/RAD/PBV Manager’s policies.
Applicant Move-In
Step 10
Site –Based Waiting List Update Step 11
SFHA will remove selected Applicant from ALL other Site-Based Waiting List. SFHA will update the applications of ALL other Referrals in accordance with the SFHA Administrative Plan.
Family Briefing
Step 12 When a family accepts an offer for PBV/RAD assistance, the SFHA must give the family a Family Briefing. The briefing will include information on how the program works and the responsibilities of the family and owner. In addition to the oral briefing, the SFHA will provide a briefing packet that explains how the SFHA determines the total tenant payment for a family, the family obligations under the program, and applicable fair housing information. Family Briefing: Review PBV Briefing Power Point Review Briefing Packet Sign the Statement of Family Responsibility Sign the Family Briefing Checklist
4.A.c.1.d
Packet Pg. 70
Att
ach
men
t: S
OP
Ap
plic
ant
Ref
erra
l PB
VR
AD
201
6 03
16
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
P a g e | 4
San Francisco Housing Authority Client Placement Department
Attachment A
SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY
Referral Request Form Email to : [email protected]
Landlord Details Property Name
Company Name
Telephone Number
Fax Number
Email Address
Vacant Unit Details House/Unit Number
Street Address
Apartment/Suite Number
Zip Code
Program <Please select the program>
PBV/RAD/PBV PBV Public Housing MOD
Income Requirement
Type of House/Apartment
Single Family Detached Semi-Detached / Row House Manufactured Home Garden / Walkup Elevator / High-Rise
Bedrooms Studio One Two Three Four Five
Bathrooms One Two Three Four Five
Date Vacancy Reported
Projected Move-in Date
ADA Information Wheelchair Accessible Roll-In Shower Hearing/Visual
Additional Information relevant to vacancy and/or referral
Authorized by Name
Position
Date
Signature
(415) 715-5200 Phone • (415) 715-3223 Fax • (415) 467-6754 TTY
www.sfha.org
Equal Housing Opportunity
4.A.c.1.d
Packet Pg. 71
Att
ach
men
t: S
OP
Ap
plic
ant
Ref
erra
l PB
VR
AD
201
6 03
16
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
P a g e | 5
San Francisco Housing Authority Client Placement Department
Attachment B
Attachment C
RAD Manager: Concerned Property Corportation
Property Name: Awesome Plaza
For Vacant Unit: 1 Awesome Plaza, #1
Referral Date: Wedensday, March 9th, 2016
Applicant Name Entity Number Address Phone Preference Bedrooms List Position
Applicant One 111111 1 Main Street, SF CA 94102 (415)111-1111 Residential COP One 1
Ou
tco
me
Additional Referral Needed:
p Yes p No
Applicant Two 2222222 2 Main Street, SF CA 94102 (415)111-1112 Homeless in PSH 2
Ou
tco
me
Additional Referral Needed:
p Yes p No
Applicant Three 333333 3 Main Street, SF CA 94102 (415)111-1113 Involuntarily Displaced 3
Ou
tco
me
Additional Referral Needed:
p Yes p No
Applicant Four 444444 4 Main Street, SF CA 94102 (415)111-1114 Homeless in SF 4
Ou
tco
me
Additional Referral Needed:
p Yes p No
Applicant Five 444444 5 Main Street, SF CA 94102 (415)111-1115 Substandard Non-Homeless 5
Ou
tco
me
Additional Referral Needed:
p Yes p No
Outcomes Codes:
A - In Process F - Ineligible - Eviction Screening
B - Did not apply G - Ineligible - Rental History
C - Applicant Withdrew Applicationto Building H - Denied - Unresponsive
D - Ineligible - Over Income I - Return to SFHA
E - Ineligible - Criminal Screening J - Other
p Applicant Housed
Move-In Date: ___________________________
Unit:_____________________________________
p Applicant NOT Housed
A B C D E F G H I J
Date: ___________________________________________
COMMENTS:______________________________________________
Site-Based Waiting List Referrals
1
p Applicant Housed
Move-In Date: ___________________________
Unit:_____________________________________
p Applicant NOT Housed
A B C D E F G H I J
Date: ___________________________________________
COMMENTS:______________________________________________
2
5
p Applicant Housed
Move-In Date: ___________________________
Unit:_____________________________________
p Applicant NOT Housed
A B C D E F G H I J
Date: ___________________________________________
COMMENTS:______________________________________________
3
p Applicant Housed
Move-In Date: ___________________________
Unit:_____________________________________
p Applicant NOT Housed
A B C D E F G H I J
Date: ___________________________________________
COMMENTS:______________________________________________
4
p Applicant Housed
Move-In Date: ___________________________
Unit:_____________________________________
p Applicant NOT Housed
A B C D E F G H I J
Date: ___________________________________________
COMMENTS:______________________________________________
4.A.c.1.d
Packet Pg. 72
Att
ach
men
t: S
OP
Ap
plic
ant
Ref
erra
l PB
VR
AD
201
6 03
16
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
P a g e | 6
San Francisco Housing Authority Client Placement Department
Attachment D
4.A.c.1.d
Packet Pg. 73
Att
ach
men
t: S
OP
Ap
plic
ant
Ref
erra
l PB
VR
AD
201
6 03
16
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
P a g e | 7
San Francisco Housing Authority Client Placement Department
4.A.c.1.d
Packet Pg. 74
Att
ach
men
t: S
OP
Ap
plic
ant
Ref
erra
l PB
VR
AD
201
6 03
16
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
Last updated April 6, 2016March 31, 2016
Proposed San Francisco RAD Emergency Referral Policy
Under certain emergency circumstances, tenants may need to move immediately to other assisted housing units to ensure their safety. The
emergency referral policies and procedures proposed below are designed to be used when processing emergency referral requests from RAD
tenants who are requesting to move to another RAD unit outside of their current property. Once the transfer request form is received verified
by the San Francisco Housing Authority (SFHA) Emergency Referral Coordinator, emergency referrals take priority over new admissions
and all other types of referrals, and are contingent upon the availability of the appropriately sized and located unit. This proposed policy is
intended to apply to all tenants in good standing who live in properties that have been converted to RAD who have a verified reason for an
emergency referral and any required documentation, as described below. Good standing means that tenants are not currently involved in an
unlawful detainer action or have not been served with a summons and complaint for eviction. Criminal activity directly relating to abuse,
engaged in by a member of a tenant’s household or any guest or other person under the tenant’s control, shall not be cause for termination of
assistance, tenancy, or occupancy rights if the tenant or an immediate member of the tenant’s family is the victim or threatened victim of
that abuse.
After the RAD tenant submits the RAD Emergency Referral Request Form, the RAD Property Manager (or member of the RAD
developer’s staff as appropriate) will initially evaluate whether the emergency referral request meets one or more of the definitions of
emergency and whether that request is supported by any required documentation, as defined below. Tenants who are requesting an
emergency referral must include documentation that supports the request for a referral. The RAD Property Manager (or member of the RAD
developer’s staff as appropriate) will work with the requesting tenant and SFHA to ensure that all resident emergency referral requests
include the necessary documentation. The RAD Property Manager (or member of the RAD developer’s staff as appropriate) will keep
confidential any information that the household member submits in requesting an emergency referral, and information about the emergency
referral, unless the household member gives the RAD Property Manager (or member of the RAD developer’s staff as appropriate) written
permission to release the information, or disclosure of the information is required by law or in the course of an eviction or termination
proceeding. This includes keeping confidential the new location of the dwelling unit of the household member, if one is provided, from the
person(s) that committed an act(s) of abuse against the tenant. Due to the nature of an emergency referral request, SFHA may place someone
on the emergency referral list before it receives proper verification.
For any referral request implicating emergency circumstances, the RAD Property Manager (or member of the RAD developer’s staff as
appropriate) will initially assess whether: 1) an internal transfer (transfer from one unit at the property to another unit at the same property)
is possible and would resolve the emergency that the tenant is facing, 2) it is more prudent to temporarily relocate (less than one year, as
defined by the Uniform Relocation Act) the tenant off-site in order to avoid immediate harm to the tenant’s household, or 3) the tenant’s
emergency requires a referral to another assisted housing unit outside of the current property.
If the RAD Property Manager (or member of the RAD developer’s staff as appropriate) initially certifies that the emergency referral request
meets one or more of the definitions of emergency defined below, is supported by any required documentation as defined below, and the
tenant’s emergency cannot be resolved by an internal transfer or temporary relocation, the RAD Property Manager (or member of the RAD
developer’s staff as appropriate) will send the tenant’s emergency referral form to the SFHA Emergency Referral Coordinator, who will
4.A.c.1.e
Packet Pg. 75
Att
ach
men
t: P
rop
ose
d S
an F
ran
cisc
o R
AD
Em
erg
ency
Tra
nsf
er P
olic
y_3-
31-1
5 (
1356
: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t
Last updated April 6, 2016March 31, 2016
determine the location of available units at other RAD properties and communicate directly with the requesting tenant. The SFHA will give
preference to emergency referral requests in the following order: emergency personal safety requests, uninhabitable condition requests, and
reasonable accommodation requests.
Type of
Emergency
Description Required Documentation
Emergency
Personal Safety
There are three types of situations that constitute
emergency personal safety circumstances:
1. The head of household or other household
member is a target of any physical
harassment and/or extreme or repeated
verbal harassment, intimidation, or coercion,
which places the household member(s) in
imminent danger1;
2. The household needs to be relocated because
of a household member’s participation in a
witness protection program or in order to
avoid reprisal as a result of providing
information about a crime to a law
enforcement agency or participation in a
witness protection program; and/or
3. Any member of the household is a survivor
of domestic violence, dating violence,
stalking, sexual assault, human trafficking,
child abuse, or elder/dependent adult abuse,
and either (1) reasonably believes that there
is a threat of imminent danger if the tenant
remains in the same development, or (2) if
the household member was a survivor of
sexual assault, the sexual assault occurred on
For the first two types of emergency personal safety referrals (survivor of
physical/verbal harassment or participation in a witness protection
program), the applicable circumstances giving rise to the emergency
must be certified in writing. This certification can be obtained through
documents such as:
a federal, state, tribal, territorial, or local police or court
document (including but not limited to a restraining order, letter
from a law enforcement agency, or court order); or
documentation signed by a professional from whom the resident
has sought assistance in addressing the physical or extreme or
repeated verbal harassment, including but not limited to: an
employee or, agent, or volunteer of a tenant services provider; an
attorney; or a medical or mental health professional; or
repeated incident report(s) and/or notices of lease violation by the
RAD Property Manager (or member of the RAD Property
Manager’s staff as appropriate).
For the third type of an emergency personal safety referral (survivor of
domestic violence, dating violence, stalking, sexual assault, human
trafficking, child abuse, or elder/dependent adult abuse), the survivor
may be required to document or provide written evidence to demonstrate
that the abuse occurred. The survivor can submit as documentation:
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s
Certification of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual
Assault, or Stalking (the survivor can use either HUD Form
1 Imminent danger is defined as the survivor’s reasonable belief of the threat or danger, with his or her particular experiences and responses to violence,
threats, and trauma, that he or she faces without the transfer. This definition is distinct and different from the definition of “actual and imminent threat”
used in the eviction context at 24 C.F.R. 5.2005.
4.A.c.1.e
Packet Pg. 76
Att
ach
men
t: P
rop
ose
d S
an F
ran
cisc
o R
AD
Em
erg
ency
Tra
nsf
er P
olic
y_3-
31-1
5 (
1356
: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t
Last updated April 6, 2016March 31, 2016
or near the development.
50066 or HUD Form 91066, both of which are attached to this
document);
a federal, state, tribal, territorial, or local police or court
document (including but not limited to a restraining order, letter
from a law enforcement agency, or court order); or
documentation signed by a professional from whom the resident
has sought assistance in addressing the domestic violence, dating
violence, stalking, sexual assault, human trafficking, child abuse,
or elder/dependent adult abuse, or the effects of abuse, including
but not limited to: an employee or, agent, or volunteer of a
survivor services provider; an attorney; or a medical or mental
health professional.
Uninhabitable
Conditions
Uninhabitable condition referrals are necessary
when conditions exist in the tenant’s unit,
building, or at the property that pose an
immediate, verifiable threat to the life, health, or
safety of the tenant or family members that
cannot be abated by internal transfer or
temporary relocation of the tenant. In these
instances, the current unit has become
uninhabitable and immediate relocation is
required as a result of the following:
Destruction by fire or other disaster
(including, but not limited to, a flood,
earthquake, or other natural or man-made
disaster); or
The existence of a major maintenance
problem that constitutes a serious danger to
health and safety.
Residents are not required to submit any specific documentation of the
emergency maintenance conditions, but the requesting resident will need
to allow a SFHA representative or RAD Property Manager to access the
resident’s unit to verify the uninhabitable condition.
Note: In addition to a tenant-initiated referral request, this referral
request may also be submitted by the RAD Property Manager, SFHA, or
other city department, as needed.
Reasonable
Accommodation
Reasonable accommodation emergency referrals
are necessary when a household member has a
verifiable medical condition that requires an
accommodation that cannot be reasonably
provided in their existing development.
If a resident claims a physical or mental impairment that limits his or her
ability to occupy their existing unit, the resident should first request an
on-site reasonable accommodation by contacting the RAD Property
Manager or SFHA. As part of such request, a resident may be asked to
fill out a Reasonable Accommodation Request Form (attached to the
Comment [U1]: Definition? Not in Lease/House Rules
4.A.c.1.e
Packet Pg. 77
Att
ach
men
t: P
rop
ose
d S
an F
ran
cisc
o R
AD
Em
erg
ency
Tra
nsf
er P
olic
y_3-
31-1
5 (
1356
: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t
Last updated April 6, 2016March 31, 2016
Examples of the types of reasonable
accommodation requests warranting a referral
may include, but are not limited to: the need to
be in a ground floor unit or a unit with an
accessible path if a household member is unable
to climb stairs; the need for a fully accessible
unit; transportation barriers; or the need for a
live-in aide. All such referrals shall be subject to
existing federal, state, and local laws.
resident’s Lease and House Rules). If the resident is requesting a
reasonable accommodation that cannot be reasonably provided in their
existing development, they may submit an emergency referral request.
If a person’s disability is obvious or otherwise known to the SFHA or
RAD Property Manager, and if the need for the requested emergency
referral is also readily apparent or known, no further verification will be
required [Joint Statement of the Departments of HUD and Justice:
Reasonable Accommodations under the Fair Housing Act].
If the requester’s disability is known or readily apparent to the provider,
but the need for the emergency transfer is not readily apparent or known,
the provider RAD Property Manager may request only information that
is necessary to evaluate the disability-related need for the emergency
referral. [Joint Statement of the Departments of HUD and Justice:
Reasonable Accommodations under the Fair Housing Act].
If a resident indicates that an emergency transfer is required for a
disability that is not obvious or otherwise known to the SFHA or RAD
Property Manager, the SFHA may request reliable disability-related
information that (1) is necessary to verify that the person meets the
federal California Fair Employment and Housing Act’s definition of
disability (i.e., has a physical or mental impairment that substantially
limits one or more of a person’s major life activities, or a record of
having, or being perceived as having, a physical or mental impairment),
(2) describes the needed emergency transfer, and (3) shows the
relationship between the person’s disability and the need for the
requested emergency referral.
Depending on the individual’s circumstances, information verifying that
the person meets the definition of disability can usually be provided by
the requesting resident. A doctor or other medical professional, a peer
support group, a non-medical service agency, or a reliable third party
who is in a position to know about the individual’s disability may also
provide verification of a disability. In most cases, an individual’s
medical records or detailed information about the nature of a person’s
4.A.c.1.e
Packet Pg. 78
Att
ach
men
t: P
rop
ose
d S
an F
ran
cisc
o R
AD
Em
erg
ency
Tra
nsf
er P
olic
y_3-
31-1
5 (
1356
: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t
Last updated April 6, 2016March 31, 2016
disability are not necessary for this inquiry. [Joint Statement of the
Departments of HUD and Justice: Reasonable Accommodations under
the Fair Housing Act].
In addition, the following requirements apply when verifying a
disability:
The RAD Property Manager and SFHA must request only
information that is necessary to evaluate the disability-related need
for the emergency referral. The RAD Property Manager and SFHA
may not inquire about the nature or extent of any disability.
If submitted, medical records will be reviewed but will not be
retained by the RAD Property Manager and SFHA. All information
that a resident provides will be kept confidential and will be used
only to help the resident have an equal opportunity to enjoy the
housing, services, and programs. It is illegal for the RAD Property
Manager and SFHA to deny the resident any services or retaliate
against the resident because the resident made a reasonable
accommodation referral request.
4.A.c.1.e
Packet Pg. 79
Att
ach
men
t: P
rop
ose
d S
an F
ran
cisc
o R
AD
Em
erg
ency
Tra
nsf
er P
olic
y_3-
31-1
5 (
1356
: C
lien
t P
lace
men
t
Good Cause for Unit Refusal
RAD Emergency Referrals
2/114/1/16
“If a tenant rejects all of the available properties for good cause, the SFHA Emergency Transfer
Coordinator must offer the tenant at least 3 alternative properties within 3-7 business days.”
-NHLP Policy Proposal
Procedure for Emergency Referrals in current SFHA Plan 12-II.D. EMERGENCY TRANSFER PLACEMENT
SFHA Policy
Emergency transfers referrals have priority over all other transfersreferrals. Those approved for
an emergency transfer referrals shall be concurrently offered three the first available units, if
available, of suitable bedroom size at three different developmentsfrom the properties indicated
on the approved emergency referral form. The developments containing the units offered, shall be
those with the most vacancies that meet the family’s bedroom requirements, except units within
the development that the family currently occupies shall not be offered or counted as being
offered. The family will have no more than three business days to inspect the units and accept an
offer. Should the family accept the offer, the family will have five (5) business days from the date
of acceptance to completely vacate the unit being transferred from and move into the unit being
transferred to. Failure to do so will be deemed to have rejected the emergency transfer referral
offer. Should the family fail to affirmatively accept the one of the three offers, the Resident will
be deemed to have rejected the all offers and the PHA shall have no further obligation to offer
additional units.
“Should the Resident refuse to accept the unit the PHA will skip over the Resident without affecting the
Resident’s placement on the transfer list. However, if the Resident refuses a second offer at a different site,
the Resident shall be dropped from the transfer list.”
-SFHA Transfer Application
Good Cause definition under current SFHA Admin Plan for new referrals:
Good Cause for Refusal of an Emergency Referral
SFHA Policy
Applicant families may refuse to accept an emergency referral for "good cause." Good
cause includes situations in which an applicant is willing to move but is unable to do so
at the time of the SFHA offer, or and the applicant demonstrates documents that
acceptance of the offer would cause undue hardship not related to considerations of the
applicant’s race, color, national origin, etc. [PH Occ GB, p. 104]. Examples of gGood
cause for refusal of an emergency referral include, but are not is limited to, the following:
Inaccessibility to source of employment, education, or job training, children’s day
care, or educational program for children with disabilities, so that accepting the offer
would require the adult household member to quit a job, drop out of an educational
Formatted: List Paragraph, Bulleted +
Level: 1 + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indent at:
0.5"
4.A.c.1.f
Packet Pg. 80
Att
ach
men
t: G
oo
d C
ause
Def
init
ion
s 4.
1.16
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
institution or job training program, or take a child out of day care or an educational
program for children with disabilities
The family demonstrates documents to the SFHA’s satisfaction that accepting the
offer will place a family member’s life, health or safety in jeopardy. The family
should offer specific and compelling documentation such as restraining orders, other
court orders, or risk assessments related to witness protection from a law enforcement
agency. Reasons offered must be specific to the family.
A health professional verifies temporary hospitalization or recovery from illness of
the principal household member, other household members (as listed on final
application) or live-in aide necessary to the care of the principal household member
The unit is inappropriate for the applicant’s disabilities, or the family does not need
the accessible features in the unit offered and does not want to be subject to a 30-day
notice to move
The unit has lead-based paint and the family includes children under the age of six
In the case of a unit refusal for good cause the applicant will remain in queue for the next
available unitnot be removed from the waiting list as described later in this section. The
applicant will remain at the top of the waiting list . However, if the Resident refuses a
second offer at a different site, the Resident shall lose their emergency referral
preference. until the family receives an offer for which they do not have good cause to
refuse.
Refusals due to location alone do not qualify for this good cause exemption
The SFHA will require documentation of good cause for unit refusals.
Formatted: Font: 12 pt
Formatted: Font: 12 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Font: 12 pt, Not Italic
4.A.c.1.f
Packet Pg. 81
Att
ach
men
t: G
oo
d C
ause
Def
init
ion
s 4.
1.16
(13
56 :
Clie
nt
Pla
cem
ent
Up
dat
e)
San Francisco Housing Authority (SFHA)
Leased Housing Programs
SEMAP updates as of March 31, 2016
4.A.d.1.a
Packet Pg. 82
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A H
CV
Rep
ort
ing
- L
ease
d H
ou
sin
g P
rog
ram
s 4_
5_16
(13
60 :
Lea
sed
Ho
usi
ng
Pro
gra
ms
Program Utilization Summary 3 - 5
PIC Reporting Rate 6 - 7
Operational Updates – Recertifications and Inspections 8 - 9
Section Eight Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) 10-13
Department Activities in Progress 14
Table of Contents
2
4.A.d.1.a
Packet Pg. 83
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A H
CV
Rep
ort
ing
- L
ease
d H
ou
sin
g P
rog
ram
s 4_
5_16
(13
60 :
Lea
sed
Ho
usi
ng
Pro
gra
ms
3
Program Utilization Summary
Program CY 2015 HAP CY 2016 HAP CY 2015 Voucher
Utilization
CY2016 Voucher
Utilization
Overall HCV
Utilization99% 99% 85% 84%
HAP utilization is 99% and Voucher utilization is 84%.
100%
99% 99% 99% 99%
99%
85% 85% 85%
84% 84%
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
2016
Program Utilization (%)
HCV HAP Utilization
HCV Unit Utilization
4.A.d.1.a
Packet Pg. 84
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A H
CV
Rep
ort
ing
- L
ease
d H
ou
sin
g P
rog
ram
s 4_
5_16
(13
60 :
Lea
sed
Ho
usi
ng
Pro
gra
ms
4
Special Programs Utilization
VASH utilization is at 84% and FUP utilization is at 73%
80% 81% 81% 82%
82% 82% 84%
100%
FY Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
2015 2016Month
Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Program
VASH Award
VASH Utilization
79% 77%
77%74%
68%73%
73%
100 %
FY Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
2015 2016
Month
Family Unification Program (FUP)FUP Award
FUP Utilization
4.A.d.1.a
Packet Pg. 85
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A H
CV
Rep
ort
ing
- L
ease
d H
ou
sin
g P
rog
ram
s 4_
5_16
(13
60 :
Lea
sed
Ho
usi
ng
Pro
gra
ms
5
Program Utilization
Key Takeaways
• 99% is the confirmed budget authority expended for HCV programs as of
March 2016.
• SFHA is projected to receive maximum points (20) for SEMAP Indicator 13 –
Leasing.
• SFHA identified some residents that were not coded accurately under the
FUP program and corrected those increasing our utilization.
• SFHA is continuing to work with FUP and VASH partners to perfect our
process and increase utilization.
4.A.d.1.a
Packet Pg. 86
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A H
CV
Rep
ort
ing
- L
ease
d H
ou
sin
g P
rog
ram
s 4_
5_16
(13
60 :
Lea
sed
Ho
usi
ng
Pro
gra
ms
6
PIC Reporting Rate
The confirmed February 2016 PIC Reporting rate for HCV is 94%.
99% 99%100%
108% 108%
96%
94%
85
90
95
100
105
110
FY Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
2015 2016
PIC Reporting Rate
HUD Minimum Reporting
PIC Reporting Rate
4.A.d.1.a
Packet Pg. 87
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A H
CV
Rep
ort
ing
- L
ease
d H
ou
sin
g P
rog
ram
s 4_
5_16
(13
60 :
Lea
sed
Ho
usi
ng
Pro
gra
ms
7
PIC Reporting
Key Takeaways
• 94% is the confirmed reporting rate for HCV programs for March 2016.
• The decrease in the PIC submissions is due to
• PIC reporting numbers fluctuate monthly based on Voucher Management
System (VMS) reported voucher utilization numbers
• HUD requires that the SFHA reporting rate be at 95% or higher. The SFHA is
currently not in compliance with HUD requirements but anticipate we will be
successfully positioned when SFHA submits the SEMAP report.
4.A.d.1.a
Packet Pg. 88
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A H
CV
Rep
ort
ing
- L
ease
d H
ou
sin
g P
rog
ram
s 4_
5_16
(13
60 :
Lea
sed
Ho
usi
ng
Pro
gra
ms
8
Annual Recertifications and Inspections
Program FY15 March 2016
Annual Recertifications 96% 85%
Annual Inspections 96% 87%
The SFHA has not met HUD’s requirement to process at least 90% Annual Recertifications on-time to earn points under SEMAP.
9690
96% 96% 96%
90%86%
82% 85%
96%
94%91% 87% 86%
87% 87%
FY Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
2015 2016
Annuals and Inspections
High Performer
Standard Performer
Inspections
Annuals
4.A.d.1.a
Packet Pg. 89
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A H
CV
Rep
ort
ing
- L
ease
d H
ou
sin
g P
rog
ram
s 4_
5_16
(13
60 :
Lea
sed
Ho
usi
ng
Pro
gra
ms
9
Operational Updates – Recertifications and Inspections
Key Takeaways
• 85% is the confirmed Annual Recertification rate for March 2016.
• Strategy that was implemented late February has yielded desired results,
SFHA is going to continue with the implementation of this strategy for April
• 87% is the confirmed Annual HQS Inspection rate for March 2016.
• Goal of “no new overdue” was met in inspections
• April’s focus is backlog inspections due to the transition to bi-annual
inspections
4.A.d.1.a
Packet Pg. 90
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A H
CV
Rep
ort
ing
- L
ease
d H
ou
sin
g P
rog
ram
s 4_
5_16
(13
60 :
Lea
sed
Ho
usi
ng
Pro
gra
ms
10
SEMAP Preliminary Report
The projected SEMAP score as of 3/31/2016 is 44.8%.
4.A.d.1.a
Packet Pg. 91
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A H
CV
Rep
ort
ing
- L
ease
d H
ou
sin
g P
rog
ram
s 4_
5_16
(13
60 :
Lea
sed
Ho
usi
ng
Pro
gra
ms
11
SEMAP Trending Analysis
The SFHA is monitoring SEMAP on a monthly basis. As of 3/31/2016 FY2016 SEMAP score is 44.8%
90 High Performer
58.5%55.2% 51.7%
51.7
37.9
51.744.8
58.8%60 Standard Perfomer
72.4%
89.7%
51.7% 55.2%
37.9% 86.2 86.2
FY Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
2015 2016
SEMAP Projected Score
FY 2015 Certification
4.A.d.1.a
Packet Pg. 92
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A H
CV
Rep
ort
ing
- L
ease
d H
ou
sin
g P
rog
ram
s 4_
5_16
(13
60 :
Lea
sed
Ho
usi
ng
Pro
gra
ms
12
Section Eight Management Assessment Program (SEMAP)
Key Takeaways
• The SFHA is monitoring SEMAP monthly.
• Site based waiting list establishment is needed to be in compliance with
Indicator #1 – Selection from the Waiting List
• Ongoing, continuous quality control and error correction is needed to
score points under Indicator #3 – Determination of Adjusted Income
• Identified file errors for Indicator #3 due to implementation of updated
Payment Standards. April & May will run exception reports to address
• Score points on Indicator #11 for the first time in 2016
4.A.d.1.a
Packet Pg. 93
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A H
CV
Rep
ort
ing
- L
ease
d H
ou
sin
g P
rog
ram
s 4_
5_16
(13
60 :
Lea
sed
Ho
usi
ng
Pro
gra
ms
13
Department Activities in Progress
Department Activities
• Emphasis Elite Software Conversion:
- Inspection tablets have not been working adequately since conversion and
have not yet stabilized.
- SFHA is working with Elite to upload census tract data to provide better data
analysis of the rental market.
- Kick-off meeting for the landlord portal occurred early this month
• Reexaminations: Staff are continuing to work on March – June effective
date Recertifications while addressing the backlog to avoid any “new
overdue” cases in PIC.
• RAD:
- Phase 1 RAD projects have closed and families were transferred to the
Project Based Voucher Program effective 12/1/2015.
- RAD Phase II PBV requests have been finalized.
- SFHA hosting a Developer Workshop to educate owners on SFHA
procedures which received positive feedback
4.A.d.1.a
Packet Pg. 94
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A H
CV
Rep
ort
ing
- L
ease
d H
ou
sin
g P
rog
ram
s 4_
5_16
(13
60 :
Lea
sed
Ho
usi
ng
Pro
gra
ms
Attrition and Hiring Data For Permanent Appointments/Separations Only
March 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 95
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
} 5 permanent staff separated during this period
} 6 temporary staff separated during this period
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 96
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
UnionUnion Resignation Retirement Involuntary Termination
Total
SEIU (Admin) 5 3 11 19
SEIU (MGI) 4 6 10
Local 261 6 4 10 20
MEA 2 1 3
Unrepresented 5 1 1 7
Local 38 1 1
Local 22 1 1
DC16 1 1
TOTAL 19 14 29 62
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 97
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
Vacant Position Title
Date Vacated Dept. Reason Union
No. of Vacancies Recruit
Filing Date HireDate Filled By
Eligibility Worker I
Various PHOTemp
PromotionSEIU Various Temporary Continuous
Temp List Appts.
Sr. Accountant
1/5/15 Finance Resignation SEIU 1 Permanent On Hold On Hold
Management Analyst
6/26/14 HCV Resignation SEIU 1 Permanent Until Filled Pending
Temporarilyfilled by Junior Management
Analyst
Property Manager I
Various PHOTemp
PromotionSEIU Various Temporary Continuous Pending
Temp. List Appts.
HR Assistant 8/19/15 HR Term Unrep 1 Permanent Until Filled 10/5/15Nancy
Rodriguez
Risk & Safety Admin.
New HR New Unrep 1 Temporary Until Filled 9/17/15Jason
Castleberry
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 98
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
Vacant Position Title
Date Vacated Dept. Reason Union
No. of Vacancies
Recruitment Filing Date
HireDate Filled By
Jr. Clerk NewClient
PlacementNew SEIU 7 Temporary
6/19/2015
July 22, 2015
Various (6)
Attorney 1 4/18/2015Gov.
AffairsResigned Unrep. 1 Temporary Until Filled 10/01/15 L. Frank
Program Manager I
New
Client Placement
/Gov. Affairs
New MEA 2Temporary/
PermUntil Filled Various
C. Smith (GovAffairs)
L. Earl (CP)W. Daniels
(HCV)
Commission Clerk
9/24/2015Gov.
AffairsResign SEIU 1 10/11/15
Temporary Worker(Staffing Agency)
HR Director 9/12/2015 HR Resigned Unrep 1 Permanent Until Filled 03/14/16 Scott Hunter
Finance Director
2/11/15 Finance New Unrep 1 Permanent Until Filled 02/29/16 Edwin Jamora
HCV Director 7/11/15 HCV New MEA 1 Permanent Until Filled 02/16/16 Sarah Ramler
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 99
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
Position Title Employ. Type Union # of Pos. Department Filing Date
Management Analyst
Permanent MEA 1 HCV Until Filled
Sr. HR Analyst Temporary Unrepresented 1 Human Resources
Until Filled
Eligibility Worker Temporary SEIU Various Various Various
Property Manager I
Temporary SEIU Various PHO Filled7/27/15
Attorney Temporary Unrepresented 1 Gov. Affairs Filled10/1/15
Human Resources Asst.
Permanent Unrepresented 1 Human Resources
Filled10/05/15
Housing Inspector
Temporary SEIU 2 HCV(Inspections)
Filled6/15/1511/2/15
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 100
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
Position Title Employ. Type Union # of Pos. Department Filing Date
CommissionClerk
Permanent SEIU 1 Gov’t Affairs& Policy
Program Manager II
Permanent MEA 2 LeasedHousing
Eligibility WorkerI
Temporary SEIU 15 Various
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 101
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 102
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 103
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 104
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
Date EmailedFinal Filing
DateAgency Name Position Title Salary
11/04/2015
Housing Authority of the County
of Santa Clara Administrative AssistantMin - $22.37 - Max $30.20 hourly
11/04/2015
Housing Authority of the County
of Santa Clara
Housing Compliance Coordinator
(2)Min - $25.48 - Max $35.67 hourly
11/04/2015
Housing Authority of the County
of Santa ClaraHousing Programs Specialist Min - $23.95 Max $33.53 hourly
11/04/2015
Housing Authority of the County
of Santa ClaraNetwork Operations Administrator
Min - $78,925 - Max $114,441
annually
11/04/2015
Housing Authority of the County
of Santa ClaraSenior Asset Manager
Min - $90,200 - Max $135,300
annually
11/04/2015
Housing Authority of the County
of Santa Clara
Senior Housing Programs
Manager Analyst (2)
Min - $72,467 - Max $105,078
annually
11/04/2015
Housing Authority of the County
of Santa Clara
Senior Manager of Strategic
Initiatives
Min - $90,200 - Max $135,300
annually
11/04/2015
Housing Authority of the County
of Santa ClaraTraining and Outreach Supervisor
Min - $69,187 - Max $100,321
annually
11/04/2015
Housing Authority of the County
of Santa Clara
Assistant Director of
Administration
Min - $103,115 - Max $154,672.50
annually
11/05/2015 11/06/2015Contra Costa County Human
Resources Department
Sheriff's Fleet Services
Coordinator
Monthly Salary Range $4,377 -
$5,320
11/05/2015
Open Until
Filled -
Extended
Contra Costa County Human
Resources DepartmentNursing Program Manager
Monthly Salary Range $9,282 -
$10,234
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 105
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
Date
Emailed
Final Filing
DateAgency Name Position Title Salary
11/15/2015Open Until Filled -
Extended
Contra Costa County Human Resources
DepartmentNursing Shift Coordinator Monthly Salary Range $8,177 - $9,940
11/05/2015 11/13/2015Contra Costa County Human Resources
DepartmentDeputy Public Defender III Monthly Salary Range $9,005 - $10,946
11/10/2015 11/13/2015
Contra Costa County Heath Services Department
Health Services Systems Analyst II Monthly Salary Range $6,511 - $8,725
11/10/2015 12/04/2015 Contra Costa County Heath Services Department Senior Clinical Laboratory ScientistMonthly Salary Range $7,267 - $8,833
11/17/2015 11/20/2015 Contra Costa County Heath Services Department Mental Health Quality Improvement CoordinatorMonthly Salary Range $6,700 - $8,144
11/17/2015 11/27/2015 Contra Costa County Heath Services Department Director of Amubulatory Care Nursing ServicesMonthly Salary Range $9,686 - $11,774
11/17/2015 Housing Authority of the County of Santa ClaraAssistant Director of Administration Min - $103,115 - Max $154,672.50 annually
11/17/2015 Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara Housing Compliance CoordinatorMin - $25.48 - Max $35.67 hourly
11/17/2015 Housing Authority of the County of Santa ClaraHousing Programs Specialist Min - $23.95 Max $33.53 hourly
11/17/2015 Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara Housing Programs SupervisorAnnual Salary Range $69,187 - $100,322
11/17/2015 Housing Authority of the County of Santa ClaraSenior Asset Manager Min - $90,200 - Max $135,300 annually
11/17/2015 Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara Senior Housing Programs Manager Analyst Min - $72,467 - Max $105,078 annually
11/17/2015 Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara Systems Administrator Annual Salary Range $78,925 - 114,441
11/17/2015 Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara Training and Outreach SupervisorMin - $69,187 - Max $100,322 annually
11/19/2015 11/30/2015 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Senior Administrative Assistant Mthly - $5,553.29 - 6,710.55
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 106
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
Date
Emailed
Final Filing
DateAgency Name Position Title Salary
11/19/2015 11/20/2015 Contra Costa County Planning Technician II Mthly - $3,692 - $4,487
11/19/2015 Entercom Part-time Digital Assistant
Part-time Production Assistant
Sales Administration Manager
Account Executive
95.7 The Game Sports Media - Account
Executive
Part-time and Full-Time Announcers
Part-time and Full-time Producers
Part-time and Full-time Board Operators
Temporary Part-time Radio Promotion
Assistants
Temporary Part-time Programming Intern
11/23/2015 Extended Contra Costa County Nursing Program Manager Mthly Salary: $9,282 - $10, 234
11/23/2015 12/11/2015 Contra Costa County Therapist Aide Mthly Salary: $3,576 - $4,437
11/23/2015 11/272015 Contra Costa County Health Plan Member Outreach Representative Mthly Salary: $3,969 - $4,956
11/24/2015 12/04/2015 Contra Costa County
Employment and Human Services Division
Manager-Administrative Mthly Salary: $7,097-$8,647
11/24/2015 Continuous Contra Costa County Juvenile Insitution Officer I Mthly Salary: $3,320 - $4,035
11/25/2015 12/04/2015 Contra Costa County
Employment and Human Services Division
Manager-Aging and Adult Services Mthly Salary: $7,097-$8,647
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 107
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
Date Emailed
Final Filing Date Agency Name Position Title Salary
12/03/2015 12/28/2015 Contra Costa County Mental Health Vocational Counselor III Mthly Salary: $5,174-$5,559
12/08/2015 Entercom_San Francisco and San Jose Assistant Program Director/Executive Producer
Part-time Digital Assistant
Sales Administration Manager
Part-time Production Assistant
Account Executive
95.7 The Game Sports Media - Account Executive
Part-time and Full-Time Announcers
Part-time and Full-time Producers
Part-time and Full-time Board Operators
Temporary Part-time Radio Promotion Assistants
Temporary Part-time Programming Intern
12/10/2015 12/15/2015 Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder Services Technician Mthly Salary $3, 424 - $4,162
12/10/2015 12/18/2015 Contra Costa County Elections Services Technician Mthly Salary $3,424 - $4,162
12/10/2015 01/15/2016 Contra Costa CountyConservatorship/Guardianship Program
Manager Mthly Salary $ 6,950 - $8,448
12/10/2015 01/15/2016 Contra Costa County Medical Records Technician Mthly Salary $ 3,361 - $4,493
12/11/2015 01/15/2016 Contra Costa County Environmental Health Specialist I Mthly Salary $5,601 - $6,808
12/11/2015 01/15/2016 Contra Costa County Environmental Health Specialist II Mthly Salary $6,352 - $7,720
12/15/2015 01/01/2016 Contra Costa County Social Service Program Analyst Mthly Salary $5,657 - $6,876
12/18/2015 12/25/2015 Contra Costa County District Attorney Office Manager Mthly Salary $4,424 - $5,650
12/21/2015 Continuous Contra Costa County Family Nurse Practitioner Mthly Salary $9,023 - $10,968
12/21/2015 Continuous Contra Costa County Charge Nurse Mthly Salary $9,113 - $10,047
12/21/2015 01/08/2016 Contra Costa County Medical Social Worker II Mthly Salary $5,373 - $6,531
12/21/2015 Continuous Contra Costa County Public Health Nurse Mthly Salary $7,476 - $10,054
12/24/2015 12/25/2015 Contra Costa County Sherrif's Aide Mthly Salary $3,436 - $4,176
12/28/2015 01/15/2016 Contra Costa County Senior Hydrographer Mthly Salary $5,612 - $6,822
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 108
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
Date Emailed Final Filing Date Agency Name Position Title Salary
01/08/16 01/22/16 Contra Costa County Health Education Specialist (Permanent and Project) Mthly Salary $3,677 - $4,469
01/08/16 01/29/16 Contra Costa County Stationary Engineer Mthly Salary $4,964 - $5,472
01/13/16 01/26/16 Central Costa Costa Sanitary District Staff Engineer Mthly Salary $6,874.26 - $8,323.33
01/14/16 01/29/16 Contra Costa County Mental Health Vocational Counselor II - Extended Mthly Salary $5,174 - $5,990
01/14/16 01/29/16 Contra Costa County Public Works Assistant Field Operations Manager Mthly Salary $6,377 - $7,039
01/14/16 01/22/16 Contra Costa County Social Service Staff Development Specialist Mthly Salary $5,657 - $6,876
01/14/16 01/29/16 Contra Costa County Electrician Mthly Salary $5,410 - $5,965
01/15/16 San Francisco and San Jose KOIT/KFOX Promotion Director
Full-time on-air and music director 98.5 KFOX
Assistant Program Director/Executive Producer
Part-time Digital Assistant
Sales Administration Manager
Part-time Production Assistant
Account Executive 95.7 The Game Sports Media-Account Executive
Part-time and Full-time Announcers
Part-time and Full-time Producers
Part-time and Full-time Board Operators
Temporary Part-time Radio Promotion Assistants
Temporary Part-time Programming Intern
01/19/16 01/15/16 Contra Costa County Eligibility Worker I Mthly Salary $2,845 - $3,458
01/19/16 01/29/16 Contra Costa County Conservatorship/Guardianship Program Manager-Extended Mthly Salary $6,950 - $8,448
01/22/16 02/12/16 Contra Costa County Advice Nurse Mthly Salary $7,949 - $8,764
01/25/16 02/08/16 Central Costa Costa Sanitary District Accountant Mthly Salary $6,846.01 - $8,283.61
01/27/16 02/12/16 Contra Costa County Supervising Accountant Mthly Salary $6,009 - $7,304
01/29/16 02/12/16 Contra Costa County Departmental Fiscal Officer Mthly Salary $6,323 - $7,704
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 109
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
Date Emailed Final Filing Date Agency Name Position Title Salary Notes
2/2/2016 2/12/2016 Contra Costa County Stationary EngineerMthly Salary $4,964 -
$5,472
2/2/2016 2/12/2016 Contra Costa County ElectricianMthly Salary $5,410 - $5,
965
2/4/2016 Unknown Santa Clara County Assistant Director of Administration Unknown Effective 01.28.2016
Santa Clara County Housing Compliance Coordinator
Santa Clara County Housing Programs Specialist
Santa Clara County Housing Programs Supervisor
Santa Clara County Senior Asset Manager
Santa Clara County Senior Housing Programs Analyst
Santa Clara County Training and Outreach Supervisor
2/5/2016 2/12/2016 Contra Costa County Deputy County Counsel-Exempt
2/5/2016 2/12/2016 Contra Costa County Advice Nurse-Part time (re-announced)Mthly Salary $7,949-
$8,764
2/5/2016 2/12/2016 Contra Costa County Registered Nurse - Beginning Level Mthly Salary $7,121
2/5/2016 2/5/2016 Contra Costa County Child Support Specialist I Mthly Salary $3,360-$4,084
2/18/2016 2/26/2016 Contra Costa CountyPublic Works Assistant Field Operations
Mgr. Mthly Salary $6,377-$7,039
2/18/2016 3/2/2016 Contra Costa County Eligibility Work Supervisor I Mthly Salary $4,931-$6,297
2/23/2016 3/4/2016 Contra Costa County Health Services Administrator - Level C Mthly Salary $6,315 -
$7,694
2/23/2016 2/26/2016 Contra Costa County Human Resources Systems AnalystMthly Salary $6,533 -
$7,941
2/23/2016 2/26/2016Central Contra Costa
County Construction Inspector Mthly Salary $7,183 -
$8,682.68
2/23/2016San Francisco and San
Jose Part-Time Production Assistant Unknown
Account Executive
KOIT/KFOX Digital Program Coordinator
KOIT/KFOX Promotion Director
Part-time Digital Assistant
95.7 The Game Sports Media-Account Executive
Part-time and Full-time Announcers
Part-time and Full-time Producers
Part-time and Full-time Board Operators
Temporary Part-time Radio Promotion Assistants
Temporary Part-time Programming Intern
2/25/2016 2/26/2016 Contra Costa County Account Clerk_Exeperienced Level $3,070-$3,805
2/25/2016 3/4/2016 Contra Costa County Public Works Maintenance Supervisor $ 5,618-$6,201
2/25/2016 3/4/2016 Contra Costa County Health Plan Member Services Counselor $ 3,587-$4,360
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 110
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
Date Emailed Final Filing Date Agency Name Title Salary Notes
3/2/2016 3/4/2016 Contra Costa County Storeroom Clerk Mthly Salary $2,757-$3,351
3/2/2016 Los Angeles
3/4/2016 3/25/2016 Contra Costa County Electronic Systems Specialist Mthly Salary $4,828-$5,568
3/3/2016 Open Until Filled Contra Costa County Health Plan Nurse Program Director (Advice Nurse) Mthly Salary $9,676-$11,761
3/3/2016 Open Until Filled Contra Costa County Health Plan Nurse Program Director (Case Management) Mthly Salary $9,676-$11,761
3/4/2016 Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara Assistant Director of Administration
Customer Service Supervisor
Deputy Executive Director
Housing Programs Supervisor
Senior Asset Manager
Sr Housing Programs Analyst
3/4/2016 3/31/2016 Housing Authority of the County of Santa Cruz Finance Director
3/7/2016 3/11/2016 Contra Costa County Community Health Worker I Mthly Salary $2,803-$3,091
3/7/2011 3/11/2016 Contra Costa County Mental Health Family Services Coordinator Mthly Salary $3,957-$5,591
3/7/2016 4/1/2016 Contra Costa County Mental Health Vocational Counselor I Mthly Salary $4,595-$5,585
3/7/2016 4/1/2016 Contra Costa County Mental Health Vocational Counselor I Mthly Salary $4,595-$5,585
3/7/2016 Open Until Filled Contra Costa County Health Services Education and Training Specialist Mthly Salary $9,023-$10,968
3/7/2016 3/25/2016 Contra Costa County Sterile Processing and Distribution Technician Mthly Salary $3,040-$3,696
3/8/2016 3/14/2016 County of Santa Clara Assistant Director of Administration
3/11/2016 3/18/2016 Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder Services Manager Mthly Salary $6,459-$7,851
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 111
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
Date Emailed Final Filing Date Agency Name Title Salary 3/14/2016 3/18/2016 Contra Costa County Mental Health Vocational Services Coordinator Mthly Salary $6,608-$8,032
3/14/2016 Open Until Filled Contra Costa County Health Services Education and Training Specialist Mthly Salary $9,023-$10,968
3/14/2016 4/1/2016 Contra Costa County Substance Abuse Counselor Mthly Salary $4,613-$5,607
3/14/2016 San Francisco and San Jose KOIT/KFOX Program Coordinator
KOIT/ KFOX Promotion Director
Part-time Digital Assistant
Part-time Production Assistant
Account Executive
95.7 The Game Sports Media- Account Executive
Part-time and Full-time Announcers
Part-time and Full-time Producers
Part-time and Full-time Board Operators
Temporary Part-time Radio Promotion Assistants
Temporary Part-time Programming Intern
3/18/2016 4/1/2016 Contra Costa County Community Health Worker Specialist Mthly Salary $3,317-$4,032
3/18/2016 Until Filled San Francisco SFHA Commission Clerk Mthly Salary $ 2,199- $2,672
3/23/2016 Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara Assistant Director of Administration
Deputy Executive Director
Housing Programs Specialist
Housing Programs Supervisor
Sr. Asset Manager
Sr. Housing Programs Analyst
3/23/2016 4/25/2016 Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency Finance Analyst
3/24/2016 4/1/2016 Contra Costa County Information Systems Programmer Analyst III $ 5,956-$7,239
3/24/2016 4/1/2016 Contra Costa County Carpenter $ 5,262- $5,802
3/24/2016 4/8/2016 Contra Costa County Senior Watershed Management Planning Specialist $6,754-$8,209
3/25/2016 4/8/2016 Contra Costa County Utlization Review Coordinator $7,629-$9,274
3/28/2016 4/8/2016 Contra Costa County Information Systems Technician II $4,895-$5,950
3/30/2016 4/6/2016 Contra Costa County Construction Inspector $2,933-$3,566
3/30/2016 4/11/2016 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Technical Support Analyst $6,375.65-$7,713.51
3/30/2016 4/6/2016 Oakland Housing Authority Housing Assistance Manager $8,246-$9,563
3/30/2016 4/11/2016 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Utility Worker $5,137.41-$6,233.15
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 112
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on
4.A.e.1.a
Packet Pg. 113
Att
ach
men
t: S
FH
A A
TT
RIT
ION
DA
TA
03_
01_1
6 T
O 0
3_31
_16
Fin
al (
1361
: H
um
an R
eso
urc
es:
Att
riti
on