Horizon 2020 Vanessa Davies, Horizon 2020 Unit Welsh European Funding Office
HORIZON 2020 - ncpwallonie.be · Rules for Participation: The driving belt for Horizon 2020 The new...
Transcript of HORIZON 2020 - ncpwallonie.be · Rules for Participation: The driving belt for Horizon 2020 The new...
La simplification administrative pour faciliter la participation et réduire les erreurs financières
HORIZON 2020
Namur
October 2013
Liliane De Wolf
Rules for Participation: The driving belt for Horizon 2020
The new Rules have been designed to achieve the three main objectives of Horizon 2020:
Innovation, Simplification and Coherence
Innovation
Coherence Simplification
RfP
Horizon 2020
…ETC
EU
Financial
Regulation
SINGLE SET OF RULES for Horizon 2020
• Covering all research programmes
and funding bodies (CIP, art.185
initiatives, art. 187 initiatives, EIT) …
…but flexible to accommodate
specificities where needed.
• In accordance with the new Financial
Regulation and its Rules of
Application.
• Coherent with the rules of the other
EU programmes.
• Also applicable to Euratom.
A SINGLE SET OF RULES
Same rate for all beneficiaries and all
activities in the grant.
The applicable rate will be defined in
the Work Programme:
Maximum
reimbursement
rates
Research and
technological
development
activities (*)
Demonstration
activities Other
activities
Network of
excellence 50%
75% (**) 100%
Collaborative
project(****) 50%
75% (**) 50% 100%
Coordination
and support
action
100% (***)
(*) Research and technological development includes scientific coordination. (**) For beneficiaries that are non-profit public bodies, secondary and higher
education establishments, research organisations and SMEs (***) The reimbursement of indirect eligible costs, in the case of coordination and
support actions, may reach a maximum 7% of the direct eligible costs, excluding
the direct eligible costs for subcontracting and the costs of resources made
available by third parties which are not used on the premises of the beneficiary. (****) Including research for the benefit of specific groups (in particular SMEs)
One project = One rate
Up to 100 % of the eligible costs;
Up to a maximum of 70 % for
innovation projects (exception for
non-profit organisations - maximum
of 100%).
A SINGLE FUNDING RATE
Indirect eligible costs shall be determined by applying a flat rate of 25 % of the direct eligible costs.
20% ? 60% ?
Real ?
Simplified?
Single model: 25 % Flat Rate
Art. 24 RfP: “Indirect eligible costs shall be determined by applying a flat rate of 25 % of the total direct eligible
costs, excluding direct eligible costs for subcontracting and the costs of resources made available by third
parties which are not used on the premises of the beneficiary, as well as financial support to third parties.”
A SINGLE INDIRECT COST MODEL
Direct costs Indirect
costs Total costs
% EU contribution
EU contribution
100 / 25 Funding 100 25 125 100% € 125
New funding model: what impact on the EU contribution? An example
In FP7, around 90 % of the Universities and more than a half of the Research
Organisations apply the 60 % flat-rate for indirect costs. For all these participants
the impact on the EU contribution of the H2020 funding model will be
favourable:
Direct costs
Indirect costs
Total costs
% EU contribution
EU contribution
Flat-rate (60 %) 100 60 160 75% € 120
• Excellence – Impact – Implementation (for the ERC:Excellence only)
Simpler evaluation criteria
• No time-sheets for personnel working full time on a single project
Simpler time-recording requirements
• CFS only if total amount of the grant for the beneficiary as reimbursement of actual costs or average personnel costs is ≥ EUR 325.000 at the time of the payment of the balance
• Audit strategy focused on risk and fraud prevention
Less certificates on Financial Statements and less audits
OTHER SIMPLIFICATIONS ELEMENTS OF HORIZON 2020
TIME TO GRANT: SPEEDING UP THE PROCESS
Exceptions: ERC, duly justified cases (complex actions) or where requested by applicants
Measures to speed up the evaluation and grant signature
Evaluating each proposal 'as it is', not as 'what could be' – no recommendations for changing proposals;
Ensuring that final GAs are based to the maximum extent possible on the Description of Work of the application;
Bringing the legal entity validation forward into the five-month information period and basing it on the FP7 legal entity database;
Electronic communication and signature of the GA.
5 months for informing all applicants on scientific evaluation
3 months
for signature of GA
Horizon 2020 has specific provisions for a maximum TTG of 8 months
Electronic signature
• Of the Grant Agreement
• Of the Amendments
• Financial Statements and Technical reports
Communication between the Commission and the beneficiaries
• Through the Participant Portal
Electronic communication for the management of the Grant Agreement:
Thank you very much for your attention!