HOP, NI, 2007 The diffraction coefficients for surface-breaking cracks Larissa Fradkin Waves and...
-
Upload
ashlee-cheetham -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of HOP, NI, 2007 The diffraction coefficients for surface-breaking cracks Larissa Fradkin Waves and...
HOP, NI, 2007
The diffraction coefficients for surface-breaking cracks
Larissa FradkinLarissa Fradkin
Waves and Fields Research Group
Faculty of Engineering, Science and Built Environment,
London South Bank University, UK
Funding bodies: IMC, EPSRC,LSBUFunding bodies: IMC, EPSRC,LSBU
HOP, NI, 2007
Professor V.M. Babich Professor V.A. Borovikov Dr V. Kamotski Dr B.A. Samokish
CollaboratorsCollaborators
HOP, NI, 2007
MotivationMotivation
Historical Overview
Statement of the problem
Sommerfeld Integral
Reduction to functional equations
Reduction to a singular integral problem
Numerical schedule
Equivalence of the singular integral problem to the original
Validation of the code
ConclusionsConclusions
Outline of the talk
HOP, NI, 2007
Probe
Motivation
Ultrasonic ray path Surface-breaking crack
Diffracting corner (wedge)
Pulse-echo inspection of a smooth planar defect at the back-wall of the component. When defect is vertical, have the ‘cat-eye’ effect, otherwise corner diffraction can become important.
HOP, NI, 2007
• Sommerfeld: 1896 - diffraction of an electro-magnetic wave by a perfectly conducting semi-infinite screen. Obtained: an exact solution in the form of a Sommerfeld integral which represents the wave field as a superposition of plane waves propagating in complex directions.
• Malyuzhinets: 1955-1958 - diffraction of acoustic plane wave by a wedge with the impedance boundary conditions. Reformulated the boundary conditions in the form of functional equations in F:
F( ) = R() F(- ) , where R = (-sin - a)/(sin -b),with a and b
known constants, and obtained an analytical solution.
Historical overview of wedge diffraction problem
HOP, NI, 2007
• Many worked on the wedge problems throughout the second half of XX century. The problem became a diffractionist's analogue of the famous Fermat's Last Theorem!
• Some relied on potential theory to reduce the problem to integral equations: Gautesen 1985-2002, Fujii 1980 - 1994, Croiselle & Lebeau 1992-2000.
• Budaev, Budaev and Bogy 1985 – 2002 followed the Sommerfeld - Malyuzhinets approach and arrived at another set of singular integral equations. We refine their arguments & develop a new numerical implementation of numerical schedule
Historical overview
HOP, NI, 2007
Equations: Helmholtz eqns for Boundary cdtis: zero-traction on weddge facesRadiation cdtns at infinity & tip conditions of bounded energy
Incident wave: P, S or Rayleigh
Solution exists and is unique (Kamotski and Lebeau 2006)
x
y
r
Statement of the problem
HOP, NI, 2007
In wedges a solution of the Helmholtz equation may often berepresented in the form of the Sommerfeld integral, =
CC(+)eikrcosdcS/cP
or as an asymptotic series in kr (Kondratiev, 1963).If andare known evaluating their Sommerfeld Integrals give us body waves diffracted from wedge tip, multiply reflected, surfaceRayleigh and head waves. If kr large, integrand is HO!
Sommerfeld Integral
2
~C
0
CC
C1
~
HOP, NI, 2007
We use two decompositions,
and sing +
and all poles k and k describing the multiplyreflected waves belong to strip
Decompositions of Sommerfeld amplitudes
)();(ResinSko
k
Skg s
where
2
Re
and are regular in this strip
SP
2
2
HOP, NI, 2007
Substituting Sommerfeld Integrals into bdry cdtns & using tip condition we obtain functional eqns
+(g(+) r11() r12() +(g(-)+(+) r21() r22() +(-)
and
+(g(-) r11() r12() +(g(+)+(-) r21() r22() +(+)
and a similar pair for - and -
Function g()=cos-1(-1cos ) transforms P scatter angles into S scatter angles, g( )=2
Reduction to functional equations
[ ]=[ [] ]+c1f1()
[ ]=[ ] [ ]+c1f2()
+
+
...2
2
HOP, NI, 2007
The functional equations can be re-arranged to give
+(g(+)++(g(-)+B +(+)++(-) =
R1()+c1()S1()
and
+(g(+)-+(g(-)+ +(+)-+(-) = R2()+c1()tanS2()
and a similar pair for - and -
{
Rearrangement of functional equations
} { }
{ {} }
+
+
+
+
HOP, NI, 2007
If F() is analytic in |Re - /2 |
and F()=O(e-Re p |Im |), Re p > -1, |Im |oo
a Hilbert-type integral transform
has the property
H: F(+)+F(-) -> F(+)-F(-), Re =
A singular integral problem
i
id
FPV
iHF
2/
2/ )(2
sin
)(..
2
1)(
2
2
2
HOP, NI, 2007
Using the Hilbert-type integral transforms the functionaleqns may be transformed into integral problems on a realline,
(H’d + K)y + =q0+
+c1+q1
+
where K is a regular operator,H’ is analytically invertibleIn the space of bounded functions and
The equation is solvable only if (H’d + P1K)y + =P1q0
+
where P1u=
0)qcq)((
dKy
A singular integral problem
0)('
dfH
+1 10
u if
0 if u=q1
0)(
du
+
HOP, NI, 2007
Applying (H’) and using a symmetrisation procedure the regularised singular integral equation is y + +L + y + = q +
When they exist, the GE, multiply reflected P and S waves may be found following well defined procedure to give P
k and S
k . Budaev-Bogy numerical schedule involves threemajor steps:
A singular integral problem
-1
HOP, NI, 2007
• solve singular integral for y+ and x- equations on line Re =/2, and finding y- and x+ using algebraic equations;• use singular integrals to find amplitudes and in strip
• use functional equations to effect analytical continuation of and to the right and to the left of this strip
Numerical schedule
d
i
fPV
)2
(2
cos
)(..
2
2
HOP, NI, 2007
The computed Sommerfeld amplitudes appear to
1. exhibit the correct behaviour at infinity (decrease as correct exponents);
2. be analytic functions satisfying the corresponding functional equations, i.e. are continuous on the boundaries of strip
3. possess physically meaningful singularities (by constructions) and no physically meaningless singularities (because they possess the correct symmetries).
Code testing
2
Re
2
HOP, NI, 2007
2. and are analytic functions satisfying the corresponding functional equations
3. is even and --- odd
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
-4 -2 0 2 4
Im PhiIm PsiRe PhiRe Psi
The computed Sommerfeld amplitudes. Wedge angle - 70o, magic
strip [0.96, 2.18], Poisson's ratio =0.25, incident wave - S and inc=0 o.
2
HOP, NI, 2007
and are analytic functions satisfying the corresponding functional equations
2. and are analytic functions satisfying the corresponding functional equations
3.is even and is odd
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
-4 -2 0 2 4
Im PhiIm PsiRe PhiRe Psi
The computed Sommerfeld amplitudes. Wedge angle - 70o, magic strip [0.96, 2.18], Poisson's ratio =0.25,
incident wave - P and inc=0o.
2
HOP, NI, 2007
Equivalence of the singular integral problem to the original
Since the computed Sommerfeld amplitudes1. exhibit the correct behaviour at infinity; 2. are analytic functions satisfying the corresponding functional
equations; 3. possess physically meaningful and no physically meaningless
singularities.
The corresponding Sommerfeld integrals (kr, ) and (kr, ) satisfy 1. the Helmholtz equations and correct tip condition; 2. zero stress boundary conditions; 3. radiation conditions at infinity.
HOP, NI, 2007
Code validation
Re fle c tio n&Tra nsm issio nC o e ffic ie nts(a m p litud e s)
w e d g e a n g le
2DWeD, Budaev and Bogy (1994) computations and Fujii (1994) numerical (solid line) and experimental (dots) Rayleigh
reflection and transmission coefficients. Amplitudes.
HOP, NI, 2007
2DWeD, Budaev and Bogy (1994) computations and Fujii (1994) numerical (solid line) and experimental (dots) Rayleigh
reflection and transmission coefficients. Phases.
Code validation
Re fle c tio n&Tra nsm issio n C o e ffic ie nts(p ha se s)
we d g e a ng le
HOP, NI, 2007
If kr large, integrand is HO and can use the steepest descent method
where P or S
Back scatter diffraction coefficients
~),( kru )( D)(kr 1/2
ikreu
(inc)
kr
diff)(
r=
HOP, NI, 2007
Code validation (P-P amplitudes)
P-wave diffraction coefficients - 100 degree wedge
0.01
0.1
1
10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Angle to wedge bisector (deg)
Diff
ract
ion
coef
ficie
ntSBU Theory
Wedge 2 MHz (+ve angles)
Wedge 2 MHz (-ve angles)
Wedge 5 MHz (+ve angles)
HOP, NI, 2007
P-wave phases of diffraction coefficients - 100 degree wedge
-180
-120
-60
0
60
120
180
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Angle to wedge bisector (deg)
Ph
ase
(deg
)
SBU Theory
Wedge 2MHz (+ve angles)
Wedge 2 MHz (-ve angles)
Wedge 5 MHz (+ve angles)
Code validation (P-P phases)
HOP, NI, 2007
Angle
LSBU
Theory
Gau
Theory
Birch
Exper
150 0.10 0.11 0.08
200 0.22 0.23 0.14
250 0.51 0.51 0.47
Code validation (S-S amplitudes)
HOP, NI, 2007
Code validation (S-S phases)
Angle
LSBU
Theory
Gau
Theory
Birch
Exper150 340 340 130
200 -430 -430 -600
250 -340 -340 -450
HOP, NI, 2007
• Start with the Green’s formula in the form of Extinction Theorem (eqtn and bdry cdtns)
• Use the Fourier Transform, radiation cdtns and tip cdtns to obtain functional eqns for the Wiener-Hopf type unknowns
• Represent solution as a sum of geometrical contributions, Rayleigh waves and an analytical unknown
• Use the Cauchy integrals to reduce the functional equations for the analytical parts to regular integral equations
Gautesen’s approach
HOP, NI, 2007
• The code for modelling surface-breaking cracks has been validated against other codes and experimental data. Limits ofapplicability: 400 < 2 < 1780
• The code is now used by British Energy Plc in design of new inspections of nuclear power plants, e.g. Sizewell, and to provideevidence of detection capability
• The Gautesen code has been extended to simulate 250 < 2a <1780
• The Gautesen technique has been applied to evaluatingdiffraction coefficients for planar cracks in TI media
Conclusions