BIENVENIDOS A LA SOCIEDAD HONORARIA HISPANICA Meeting – el 25 de agosto 2015.
Honoraria for Design Build Projects Methodology Assessment Matrix
23
Honoraria for Design Build Projects Methodology Assessment Matrix
description
Honoraria for Design Build Projects Methodology Assessment Matrix. Honoraria. Principles for the selection of a Design Builder Development of the Honoraria Matrix How to use the Honoraria Matrix. Joint Industry-Government Design-Build Task Force. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Honoraria for Design Build Projects Methodology Assessment Matrix
Honoraria for Design Build Projects
Methodology Assessment Matrix
Honoraria
Principles for the selection of a Design Builder– Development of the Honoraria Matrix
– How to use the Honoraria Matrix
Joint Industry-Government Design-Build Task Force
• Association of Consulting Engineers of Canada• Canadian Construction Association• Canadian Design-Build Institute• Construction Specifications Canada• Royal Architectural Institute of Canada• Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade• Department of National Defence• Public Works and Government Services Canada• Defence Construction Canada
Joint Industry-Government Design-Build Task Force
Principles for the selection of a Design Builder
• Remuneration– 50% of a reasonable fee– Based on complexity of the project and on level of
detail contained in the Request for Proposal
Guide for Calculation of Remuneration
Remuneration = estimate of construction cost x scope factor x cost factor
Scope Factor
Combination of:• Level of detail in the RFP documents
– High– Medium– Low
• Complexity of the project– High– Medium– Low
Scope Factor:
Detail Low
0.004 Min $20,000
0.005 Min $25,000
0.006 Min $30,000
Detail Medium
0.003 Min $15,000
0.004 Min $20,000
0.005 Min $25,000
Detail High
0.002 Min $ 7,500
0.003 Min $15,000
0.004 Min $20,000
Level of Detail in Request for
Proposal Documents
Complexity Low
Complexity Medium
Complexity High
Complexity of Project
Cost Factor:
Estimated Construction Cost
Cost Factor (1)
Up to $25,000,000 1.0 to 0.9
$25,000,000 to $50,000,000 0.9 to 0.8
$50,000,000 to $100,000,000
0.8 to 0.7
$100,000,000 to $150,000,000
0.7 to 0.6
$150,000,000 to $200,000,000
0.6 to 0.5
$200,000,000 to $250,000,000 0.5 to 0.4
Note 1: Cost Factor is a sliding scale within each estimate category
Example
• Aquatic Centre with competition pool, wave pool, leisure water play area, weight training, and exercise room - $32,000,000
• RFP included building program, functional relationships and description of intended image and character
• Best Value Selection 50% quality/50% price requiring a comprehensive proposal
Example - Scope Factor:
Detail Low
0.004 Min $20,000
0.005 Min $25,000
0.006 Min $30,000
Detail Medium
0.003 Min $15,000
0.004 Min $20,000
0.005 Min $25,000
Detail High
0.002 Min $ 7,500
0.003 Min $15,000
0.004 Min $20,000
Level of Detail in Request for
Proposal Documents
Complexity Low
Complexity Medium
Complexity High
Complexity of Project
Example - Cost Factor:
Estimated Construction Cost
Cost Factor (1)
$25,000,000 to $50,000,000 0.9 to 0.8
Note 1: Cost Factor is a sliding scale within each estimate category
Cost Factor = 0.872
Example - Remuneration
$32,000,000 x 0.006 x 0.872 = $167,000
Remuneration
Guide for the Calculation of Remuneration for Design-Build
Proposals@
www.cdbi.org
Methodology Assessment Matrix
Design• For what project complexity is the delivery
method best suited• To what extent must user requirements be
defined prior to tender• What level of design quality is
characteristically achieved with the delivery method
Methodology Assessment Matrix
Design• How complex is the design review
process for the owner• To what extent can the delivery
method accommodate scope/design changes during construction phase
Methodology Assessment Matrix
Design• To what extent does the delivery method
inherently minimize changes• To what degree do the owner and user
have direct contact with the designer and are they able to directly influence the design
Methodology Assessment Matrix
Schedule• To what extent can the delivery
method achieve accelerated delivery, or ensure delivery to specific schedule
• Ability to accommodate early construction start
Methodology Assessment Matrix
Cost• Potential to obtain an early cost commitment• To what extent does the method
accommodate adjustments to scope change during construction to achieve final costs within budget
• To what ability can the delivery method reduce claims/costs for changes and delays
Methodology Assessment Matrix
Cost
• Ability to meet cash flow
• To what extent does the method permit the Owner to influence systems, materials and construction methods to minimize life cycle costs
Methodology Assessment Matrix
Contracting• To what extent is the required design
and construction experience and knowledge available for the method
• Ability to pre-qualify the prime contractor on publicly funded projects
• Ability to pre-qualify the prime contractor on privately funded projects
Methodology Assessment Matrix
Contracting• Ability to pre-qualify subcontractors• To what extent does the method employ
a simple bid evaluation and selection system
• What level of construction quality can be achieved with the applicable delivery method
Methodology Assessment Matrix
Risk
• To what extent does the method permit the Owner to transfer the liability for design errors and omissions, delays, construction errors and omissions and non conformance to contract documents
Methodology Assessment Matrix
General
• To what extent do Owners have the experience and knowledge required to employ the method
• Market readiness
