HONG KONG MONETARY AUTHORITY Common Deficiencies Identified in Tier 2 AML Examinations 12 May 2009.
-
Upload
maximillian-jackson -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of HONG KONG MONETARY AUTHORITY Common Deficiencies Identified in Tier 2 AML Examinations 12 May 2009.
HONG KONG MONETARY AUTHORITYHONG KONG MONETARY AUTHORITY
Common Deficiencies Identified in Common Deficiencies Identified in Tier 2 AML ExaminationsTier 2 AML Examinations
12 May 200912 May 2009
2
• Failure to verify nationality of non-permanent HKID holders
• Acceptance of expired passports
• Failure to record the identity of 3rd parties making large cash deposits
• Address proof : failure to obtain or acceptance of out of date documents
• Inadequate follow-up on outstanding CDD documentation
• 3rd party payments from accounts with outstanding CDD
General CDDGeneral CDD
3
• No periodic review of CDD of lower risk accounts in absence of trigger event
• Incoming cross border remittance transactions containing incomplete originator information – inadequate monitoring
• No periodic re-screening of client list against SFC Alert List
• Intermediaries - no assessment of the ‘fit and proper’ standing
General CDDGeneral CDD
4
• Failure to identify beneficial owner
• Failure to obtain up to date company search documents (incorporated in jurisdiction with public registries) & COI (from regulated parties in non-public registry jurisdictions)
• Bearer shares - failure to immobilize or obtain annual declarations from shareholders
Corporate CustomersCorporate Customers
5
• Failure to properly identify and screen connected parties (i.e. directors, principal shareholders, signatories)
• Details of connected parties are not included in AI’s core banking system - resulting in no periodic re-screening against Terrorist/Sanction/PEP lists
Corporate CustomersCorporate Customers
6
• Excluding known close associates & family members from PEP definition
• No regular review of identified PEP accounts
• No periodic re-screening of client lists to identify clients whose status may have changed
• Failure to screen connected parties to corporate customer
PEPsPEPs
7
• No review of the risks associated with reported accounts
• Undue reliance on “consent” and the former “Low Risk Classification”
• STR provides statutory defense to ML – does not address the legal, reputational, regulatory risks associated with accounts’ continued operation
Suspicious Transaction ReportingSuspicious Transaction Reporting
8
• Exchange of Swift Keys ‘deemed’ establishment of correspondent activity
• Failure to obtain sufficient information to assess the adequacy and effectiveness of the respondent's AML controls and risk.
• AI must satisfy itself respondent – subject to appropriate regulatory oversight
– does not maintain relations with shell banks
– payable through accounts (special measures required).
Correspondent BankingCorrespondent Banking
9
• Account booked offshore but managed in HK – ‘deemed’ shared relationship
• CDD conducted to standard required by HKMA (minimum)
• HKMA access to CDD/transaction information upon request
Private BankingPrivate Banking
10
Questions