MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M....

117
ADMINISTRATiVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS MARYLAND SENTENCING GUIDELINES Annapolis, Maryland 21401 MANUAL Revised March 1987 974—2061 224—2061 (Marcom) 261—1402 x 2061 (Washington Line)

Transcript of MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M....

Page 1: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

ADMINISTRATiVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS

MARYLAND SENTENCING GUIDELINES

Annapolis, Maryland 21401

MANUAL

Revised March 1987

974—2061

224—2061 (Marcom) 261—1402 x 2061 (Washington Line)

Page 2: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

(rcuit urt i2 37fi-r

111 Nom CALvERI STREET

BALT.MOPE. MARYLAND 21202

MARSHALL A. LEvIN 396-5054JUDGE City Deat TTY 396-4930

pri1 7, 1987

RE: Sentencing Guidelines

Dear Colleague:

Please find the revised Manual (including a simplifiedWorksheet) as promised in the Annual Report of the MarylandSentencing Guidelines Board. The Annual Report was included inthe Memorandum of “Reports Requiring Action” sent to you by StateCourt Administrator James H. Norris, Jr., under date of March 23,1987.

Enclosed also is a Summary of the revisions. As you know,at sentencing, there is the benefit of a worksheet which tellsthe judge the range of sentences imposed by his/her peers for aperson like the defendant who has committed the same kind ofcrime in the same “way” (of course, the judge does not have tosentence “within the guidelines” but may sentence higher or lowergiving the reasons). In order to know what the peer sentencesare, we “keep score” and periodically analyze data so that thesentencing range truly reflects the current sentencing activitiesof the various judges throughout the State. In this way, we areable to present current information to a judge when performingthe awesome responsibility of sentencing. Hence the need for“revisions.”

As mentioned, the revisions were the culmination of atremendous amount of hard and necessary work by the judgeson Judge Howard S. Chasanow’s Guidelines Revision Committee.The Revision Committee’s various recommendations were adopted

Page 3: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

—2--

unanimously by the judges on the Sentencing GuidelinesBoard. As you know, the Board consists entirely ofstatewide judges. The judges were ably assisted by exofficio Board members, each of whom represents an importantcomponent in the criminal justice system. Finally, theStaff must be given full recognition for its valuable andabsolutely vital input.

We respectfully ask that you favorably consider theserevisions at the upcoming business meeting of the JudicialConference to be held on April 23, 1987 at 2:00.

Sincerely,

1jL / c c-

Marshall A. LevinJudge

MAL : ms

Page 4: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

MfRYLND SENTENCING GUI DEL I NES MANUAL1997 REVISIONS

SUMMARY

Various cdi cria1 changes were made throughout the manual.

F’ aFor- purposes of guidelineS, new trials ordered by appel1ae .;ourts are

to he treated fleW C5CS.

Misdemeanors not listed in the manual are Seriousness Category VII.

Exclusic3nfrom the guidelines are limited to appeals and prayers fur

jury trial from District Courts parole and probation

r-evocations, r,on—incarcerable offenses, first degree murder

convictions purSuant to 27/413. public local laws and

municipal ordinances, and bigamy. <E(igamy is not listed as

exclusion. Perhaps it should be.)

3 Worksheet

Disposition type has been changed.. (See pages.7—6.)

dditionai sentence elements care to be recorded: Fineq

reStitu1on and community service. (See also page 13

Date of plea/verdict deleled.Names of prosecLLtDr and defense counsel deleted.

General rearrangement.

1, 13 For purposes o-F ‘:ui deli nas the 1 enqth o-f a sentence will be rt

unsuspendd incarceration imposed er

i.o ‘r JJ_ ctx..ci_±r 0 m _r ev iou se

vent.

In splii: sentence casesq an extra copy o-f the guidelines workseet

;houid he made after senencinq and sent to the

<ppropriate probation office.

The 1 abel ing uf disposi ion types has been changed Sand the nuir’her

reduced to four:

1. Flea agreement——judge is o describe

2. Plea no agreement3. Court trial4. Jury trial

1:3—14 Information about the uidel ines’ ‘range and he actual sentence haa

been rearran’;ed and expanded.

Two substantive changes were mad-a in the rel.ionship of guidelines

ranges and actual sentences:4q13 1. F’rior unexpired sentences are to be considered in

rJetermji,jnq how much additional unsuspended incarceration

must be imposed for he new sentence(s) to be within theguidelines.

16—20 2. In calculating gutdelines for multiple criminal eventssentenced at the same time the prior criminal record is nolonger enhanced after sentencing each event. (See ppenciix8.>

15 Two aggravating factors are specifically mentioned in the manual

Page 5: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

as factors to be considered for sentencing above theguidelines in drug cases1. Sale or possessi an of an unusual 1 y 1 arge amount •o-f drugs.2. Evidence that the offender was an upper echelon dr-u

deal er.Judges are asked to specify the statute invoked to senterca an

offender as a subsequent o-Ffender.

Pppendix t

Offenses added to manual:(-rscn of a dwellingEscapePer jtryUsing minors for CUS distribution1 etc.Cruelty to animalsExtortion——additional offensesFalse alarmFalse statementsFrescription drug offensesRiot in gSerial number offensesIncarcerable offeises jr addition those in Title 27 of the

MarvL and Code

O-f+eises del etad from manual (hut not from ui deli nes)Uninnl yment i nurance fraudf:ep i ng a disorderly house

cThange’s t n er i ousness Ca torypr-son of persona! property vorth $1 ,O(x) or more——f rum VII to

V

ittemptecJ rape——from III to I or II (depending on degree)ttempted murder——from I or [I (depending on degree) to IIIC.arryi ng a handgun openly with intent Lo kill ——from VII to VSal Lci tation to c:ommit murder——from I to IIJU’i----+r3m VII to V

Dhi lii abuse is to be reported as physi cal, or sexual.

Credit card offenses committed in a continuirg course of conduct nay baggregated with the total value of goods, etc. used todetermine whether sentencing. should be c-f a -felony or amisdemeanor.

Manslaughter is to be reported ascluntary or involuntary.

ppendix B

Maryland mi sdemenor not listed in the manual wi 1 1 be Sen OLLSflSSCategory VII.

If offenses from different criminal events are being sentencedtogetherq the offenders prior record will still include anyadjudication of guilt prior to the current sentencing but therecord will be the same far each criminal event at the currentsentenci ng.

ppendix C

Page 6: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Matrix -for OftEnSeS aajnst persons

Ceil 2/i chanqed from 2Y—? to 1SM—5Y

Cell 4/7 changed -from 6Y—i.2Y to 5Y-12Y

Cell 9/0 chanqed -from 7Y—12Y o 5Y—1OY

Cell 9/1 changed from 6Y--1Y to 7Y-1C1

x -for drug offensesifeil iil/T c:han’ied om 2’r’—5Y to IBM—5Y

1ttr i for proper L’ off ense.

Cci 1 ‘I i/o cnanqed -fr-cm F—M to P—ill

Cell Yl 1/I. changed +rom P—bM to F—I1

The row with 8cr-i oucncss Ctecori as V and VI and the ro w th

11£ and IV were expanded into +O.1r rows, one -for ca:h

c-f those -four sari ouiness cateori as. cnother row

added For Sari ousress Category II - The guidal ines

ranq were adj Listed enough to Etccommodate these

addi ions.

ppendix I)

The Jur-isdictions were given new identifying numbers.

r-ppendix

The smpi a c aces were revised to conform to guidelines changes.

Page 7: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

MARYLAND SENTENCING GUIDELINES BOARD

JUDGES

Hon. Marshall A. Levin, ChairpersonHon. Howard S. Chasanow, Vice—ChairpersonHon. Robert M. BellHon. Elsbeth Levy BotheHon. Brodnax Cameron, Jr.Hon. Arrie W. DavisHon. Joseph H. H. KaplanHon. Eugene M. LernerHon. James S. McAuliffe, Jr.Hon. Audrey E. MelbourneHon. George B. Rasin, Jr.Hon. Calvin R. SandersHon. Frederick C. Wright, III

EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS

Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, SenateJudicial Proceedings Committee

Charles G. Bernstein, Private BarPhilip G. Dantes, Chairman, Maryland Parole

CommissionWilliam DeVance, Director, Division of Parole

and ProbationArnold Hopkins, Commissioner of CorrectionsHon. William S. Horned Chairman, House of

Delegates Committee on the JudiciaryM. Kenneth Long, Jr., President, Maryland

State’s Attorneys AssociationJoseph E. Owens, Deputy Secretary, Department of

Licensing and RegulationFloyd 0. Pond, Executive Director, Governor’s

Office of Justice AssistanceBishop Robinson, Secretary, Department of Public

Safety and Correctional ServicesNorman N. Yankellow, Public Defender

STAFF

Michael V. O’MalleyGeorge N. WeberDebruoh D. Taylor

(Rev. 3/87)

Page 8: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

PREFACE CThe Maryland sentencing guidelines cover most criminal cases

originating in a Circuit Court. Based on sentencing experience inMaryland, the guidelines were first developed, with staffassistance, by a Board of judges, legislators and otherrepresentatives of the Criminal Justice System.

The chief goals of sentencing guidelines are:

1. To increase equity in sentencing, i.e., to reduceunwarranted variation while retaining judicial discretionto individualize sentences;

2. To articulate an explicit sentencing policy while providinga regular basis for policy review and change;

3. To provide information for new or rotating judges; and

4. To promote increased visibility and understanding of thesentencjug process.

Sentencing guidelines make it possible to take into accountsystematically and publicly the most common variations inoffenders and their offenses, within the current sentencing Cframework. Systematic sentencing can be achieved by having thejudiciary, as a body, agree on certain core factors and theirweights, to be considered in making sentencing decisions. Itshould be emphasized that sentencing guidelines are, as the nameindicates, guidelines to assist judges in sentencing. They are

• not mandatory. Guidelines complement rather than replace theV judicial decision—making process or the proper exercise of

judicial discretion.

C(Rev. 3/87) ii

Page 9: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PagePREFACE ii

LIST OF TABLES v

PART 1 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1

1.1 Guidelines Offenses 11.2 Guidelines Worksheet 21.3 Guidelines Sentence 21.4 Sentences Outside the Guidelines 41.5 Guidelines Worksheet Distribution 5

PART 2 USING THE GUIDELINES WORKSHEET 6

2.1 Case Information 62.2 Guidelines Scoring 8

2.2.1 Computation of the Offense Score 8A. Seriousness Category of Convicted Offense 9B. Victim Injury 9C. Weapon Usage 10D. Special Vulnerability of •Victim 10

2.2.2 Computation of the Offender Score 11A. Relationship to CJS when Instant

Offense Occurred 11B. Juvenile Delinquency 12C. Prior Adult Criminal Record 12D. Prior Adult Parole/Probation Violations 12

2.3 Determining the Guidelines Sentence 132.3.1 Actual Sentence 132.3.2 Person Offenses 142.3.3 Drug Offenses 152.3.4 Property Offenses 152.3.5 Multiple Offenses 152.3.5.1 Scoring Single Criminal Events — Not

More Than One Offense fromSeriousness Category I or II 15

2.3.5.2 Scoring Single Criminal Events — Twoor More Offense from SeriousnessCategory I or II 17

2.3.5.3 Scoring Multiple Criminal Events — OneOffense in Each Event 18

2.3.5.4 Scoring Multiple Criminal Events — MoreThan One Offense in One or More Events 18

2.3.6 Presentence Detention 202.3.7 Mandatory Sentences 202.3.8 Subsequent Offenses 202.3.9 “White Collar” Offenses 20

(Rev. 3/87) iii

Page 10: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

TABLE OF CONTENTS(Continued)

PageAPPENDIX A. Maryland Criminal Offenses A—i

APPENDIX B. Criteria for Classification of PriorCriminal Adult Record B—i

Table B.i Chart B—3Table B.2 Maryland Sentencing GuidelinesPrior Record Form B—4Table B.3 Description B—5

APPENDIX C. Guidelines Sentence Ranges C—i

Table C.ia Sentencing Matrix for OffensesAgainst a Person C—i

Table C.ib Sentencing Guidelines forOffenses Against a Person C—3

Table C.2a Sentencing Matrix for DrugOffenses C—5

Table C.2b Sentencing Guidelines forDrug Offenses C—7

Table C.3a Sentehcing Matrix for PropertyOffenses C—9

Table C.3b Sentencing Guidelines forProperty Offenses C—u

APPENDIX D. Jurisdiction Codes D—1

APPENDIX E. Guidelines Sample Cases E—1

Case i Offense Against a Person —

Single Convicted Offense E—3Case 2 Drug Offense —

Single Convicted Offense E—7Case 3 Property Offense —

Single Convicted Offense E—iOCase 4 Multiple Offenses —

Single Criminal Event E—i4Case 5 Offenses Against a Person —

Multiple Offenses from Categories Iand II — Single Criminal Event E—20

Case 6 Multiple Offenses —

Multiple Criminal Events E—29Case 7 Multiple Offenses from Single and

Multiple Criminal Events E—35Case 8 Mandatory Minimum Sentence E—44

INDEX I—i

C(Rev. 3/87) iv

Page 11: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

1 Sentencing Guidelines Worksheet 3

2 Case Information 6

3 Offense Score 9

4 Offender Score 11

5 Guidelines Range 13

6 Actual Sentence 14

7 Scoring Single Criminal Events — Not MoreThan One Offense from Seriousness CategoryI or II 16

8 Scoring Single Criminal Events — Two or MoreOffenses from Seriousness Category I or II.... 17

9 Scoring Multiple Criminal Events — OneOffense in Each Event 18

10 Scoring Multiple Criminal Events — More thanOne Offense in One or More Events 19

(Rev. 3/87)v

Page 12: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

PART 1

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1.1 GUIDELINES OFFENSES

Offenses covered by the guidelines are thosePerson Offenses initiated in a circuit court. They are divided

(SampLe Case i, into three categories: person, drug and property.

p 3) An offense against a person is defined as anoffense involving confrontation between the

Drug Offenses offender and the victim, with bodily harm or the(Saxirple Case 2 threat of bodily harm. Also included in this

p 7) category are all weapons offenses. Drug offensesare those involving controlled dangerous substances

Property Offenses or related paraphernalia. Property offenses are(Sample Case 3, offenses where property is unlawfully damaged or2. E-1O) taken.

A list of many Maryland offenses appears inOffenses Listed in Appendix A. Any misdemeanor which carries aAppendix A possible penalty of incarceration and is not listed

should be assigned to Seriousness Category VII. Ifa felony is not listed, call the SentencingGuidelines Office for assistance.

New trials ordered by appellate courts shouldbe treated as new cases.

Certain sentencing matters handled by judgesExclusions in the circuit court are excluded from guidelines

coverage. The exclusions are:

o Prayers for jury trial from District Court

o Appeals from District Court

o Parole or probation revocations

o Crimes which carry no possible penalty ofincarceration

o First Degree Murder convictions pursuant toArticle 27/413 (death penalty)’

o Public local laws and municipal ordinances

‘Unless Article 27/413 is invoked, theguidelines sentence for First Degree Murder islife.

(Rev. 3/87) 1

Page 13: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

1.2 GUIDELINES WORKSHEET

The Sentencing Guidelines Worksheet is to be

One Criminal Event, used for up to three convicted offenses from a

up to three Offenses single criminal event. (A single criminal event is

per Worksheet defined as one or more crimes committed in thecourse of the same transaction.) If there are morethan three convicted offenses from a singlecriminal event, additional worksheets are to beused as needed for that event.

Criminal Behavior When two or more convictions result from

over a Period criminal behavior over a period of time, each

of Time conviction is considered a separate event. Atleast one worksheet must be used for each.

Prior to any sentencing decision using theguidelines, a worksheet or worksheets should becompleted, down to the section labeled “ActualSentence.” Each convicted offense for which theoffender is to be sentenced should be included.The worksheet, a copy of which appears on page 3,is printed on six—part pressure—sensitive paper, socare must be used to make sure that all copies arelegible.

If the judge orders a presentence CWorksheets investigation, each worksheet will be filled out by

Completed by the Division of Parole and Probation. If the judgedoes not order a presentence investigation, he orshe can complete the worksheet personally ordelegate the task to opposing counsel or one of thejudge’s staff. Regardless of who completes aworksheet, it is the responsibility of the judge toreview the worksheets for completeness andaccuracy.

A copy of each completed worksheet should be

Presentencing forwarded to both the defense attorney and the

Distribution prosecutor so that they will have an opportunity to

of Worksheets review the information provided. Any disagreementsthey may have should be brought to the judge’s

Additions or attention prior to sentencing. Changes in the

Corrections to worksheet may be made only or with the approval

Worksheets of the sentencing judge.

1.3 GUIDELINES SENTENCE

The guidelines sentence, based on the type ofoffense and type of offender, is given as a range.

Non—suspended The guidelines sentence range represents only non—Incarceration suspended time. If the guidelines range for a (

(Rev. 3/87)2

Page 14: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

First

ddle)

.JR

ISD

ICT

ION

TO

TA

LN

__..._._

TF

1

RE

ST

TC

S—

——

TR

AN

GE

TO

UT

1

MA

RY

LA

ND

SE

NC

ING

OF

FE

ND

ER

NA

ME

(Last

.

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

WO

RK

SH

EE

T

PS

ID

AT

EO

FO

FF

EN

SE

DA

TE

OF

SE

NT

EN

CIN

G

IY

e2N

oI

II

CO

NV

ICT

ED

CR

IMIN

AL

AT

TH

IS

SE

NT

EN

CIN

GO

FF

EN

SE

SE

VE

NT

S

NU

MB

ER

OF

:

-I

iI

Ii

WO

RK

SH

EE

TS

—_

__

__

_O

F

CR

IMIN

AL

.E

VE

NT

S

__

__

__

__

1.P

lea

agreem

ent•

sta

tenatu

re

of

DIS

POSI

TIO

NTY

PE

eii

cIM

UIt

Mil

eF

emal

eB

lack

Whi

leH

ispa

nic

Oth

er

12

12

34

iiii

2P

lea,

no

agreem

ent

3C

ou

rttr

ial

4Jury

tria

l

Ti

CO

NV

ICT

ED

OF

FE

NS

ET

ITL

EA

OC

CO

DE

MD

CO

DE.

AR

T.1.

SEC

TIO

NS

TA

T.

MA

XD

OC

KE

TN

UM

BE

R

1st

—______

I2nd

II

3rd

Dl

I_I

OF

FE

NS

ES

CO

RE

jfQ

ffri

seA

gain

sta

Per

son

Onl

y)‘‘

OF

FE

ND

ER

SC

OR

EG

UID

EL

INE

SA

CT

UA

LS

EN

TE

NC

EIm

pose

d,su

spen

ded,

prob

atio

n.Su

bseq

uent

1st

Off

2nd

OfI

3rd

Off

A.

Ser

iousn

ess

Cat

egor

yA

.R

elat

ionsh

Ipto

CJS

Whe

nR

AN

GE

line,

resl

itulio

n,co

mm

unity

serv

ice

Ofle

nder

Inst

ant

Cou

ntO

ccurr

edli

tO

ffen

se1st

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

se1

Yes

2ro

0101

01=

V.V

II0

=N

one

orP

endi

ngC

ases

0303

03=

IV1

=C

ourt

orO

ther

Cri

min

al05

0505

IIIJu

stic

eS

uper

visi

on-

0808

08B

.Ju

venI

leD

eli

nq

uen

cy

2n

dO

ffen

se

1010

10=

I0

=N

otM

ore

Tha

nO

neT

oF

indi

ngof

Del

inqu

ency

B.

VIc

tImIn

jury

orov

erag

e25

00

0=

No

Inju

ryI

=T

wo

orM

ore

Fin

ding

s,N

o2n

dC

on

vic

ted

Off

ense

‘es

2N

oor

One

Com

mit

men

t1

11

=N

oIn

jury

,N

on-P

erm

anen

t2

=T

wo

orM

ore

cojn

jntL

ruer

jj3r

dO

hm

ic

22

2=

Per

man

ent

Inju

ryor

Dea

thC

.P

rior

Adu

ltC

rim

Inal

Rec

ord

TOC

.W

eapo

nU

sage

0=

Non

e

00

0=

No

Wea

pon

1=

Min

or

11

1=

Wea

pon

Oth

erT

han

Fir

earm

3=

Mod

erat

eG

UID

EL

INE

S

22

2=

Fir

earm

orE

xplo

sive

5=

Maj

orR

AN

GE

3rd

Co

nv

Icte

dO

ffense

1Y

es2

No

D.

Spe

cial

Vul

nera

bili

tyof

VIc

tIm

0.P

rior

Adu

ltP

aro

IeIP

rob

atI

7(F

orM

ulti

ple

VIo

lati

ons

Co

un

tsO

nly)

00

0=

No

0=

No

11

1=

Yes

1=

Yes

TO

‘III

OF

FE

NS

ES

CO

RE

(S)

OF

FE

ND

ER

SC

OR

EJ—

—____________

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

_

AD

OU

SEO

NLY

.D

ON

OT

WR

ITE

INSP

AC

EB

ELO

W

IN

C___...

——

PR

O..

_R

AN

Fl RE

ST

CS

——

—-

02—

USE

ci

IC

AC

T

CO

N_

PR

O_

.....

Fl RE

ST

CS

_..____._

sU

S_

__

.__

AC

T____

CO

N_

PR

O..__

Fl RE

ST—

EV

EN

TS

TL

RA

NG

E—

TU

RA

NG

E—

TO

TA

LI

TO

TA

LS

_____

RE

AS

ON

IFA

CT

UA

LS

EN

TE

NC

ED

EP

AR

TS

FR

OM

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

RA

NG

EIN

ST

ITU

TiO

NA

LIP

AR

OL

ER

EC

OM

ME

ND

AT

ION

IAD

DIT

ION

AL

INF

O.

SEN

TEN

CIN

GJU

DG

ESI

GN

ATU

RE

WO

RK

SHEE

TC

OM

PLET

EDBY

TIT

LE

TOU

T2—

—-—

TUSE

CO

PIE

S:W

hite

-Jud

ge;

Blu

e-A

OC

;G

reen

-Att

ach

to

Com

mitm

ent

or

Pro

bati

onO

rder

;Y

ello

w-F

ile;

Pin

k-P

rose

cuti

on;

Gol

d-D

efen

se(R

ev.

7187

)

Page 15: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

particular case is 6 to 12 years, the judge will be

within the guidelines if he gives a sentence such

as 10 years with 4 years suspended or 15 years with

5 years suspended. If, however, he gives 6 years,

all suspended, the sentence will be outside the

guidelines.

If an offender is already under sentence, timeremaining to be served should be indicated on the

worksheet with the rest of the sentencing

information. This remaining time will be counted

in determining whether the new sentence orsentences are within the guidelines. If theguidelines range is 2 to 5 years and the offender

has served 1 year of a previous 3 year sentence,

he would have to receive at least two years ofadditional unsuspended time to be sentenced withinguidelines. Among sentences that would be within

the guidelines in this example are 4 yearsconcurrent, 2 years consecutive or 8 years

concurrent with 4 years suspended.

Probation Within statutory limits, the length of anyprobation imposed is left to the discretion of thejudge.

1.4 SENTENCES OUTSIDE THE GUIDELINES

Written Reasons Whenever a sentence outside the recommended

for Departure guidelines range is imposed, the judge should give

from Guidelines written reasons on the guidelines worksheet.Reasons for departing from guidelines shouldindicate specifically why the sentence actuallyimposed is more appropriate, reasonable, orequitable than a sentence within he guidelines.These reasons may be brief but should besubstantive. Although the guidelines are advisoryto the sentencing judge, it is expected that he orshe will deviate from the guidelines only whencircumstances are compelling.

1.5 GUIDELINES WORKSHEET DISTRIBUTION

Copies of each guidelines worksheet should beDistribution of distributed as follows:Color-codedWorksheets White — Sentencing Judge

Blue — Administrative Office of theCourts (Maryland SentencingGuidelines)

Green (a) Attached to commitment orderif defendant receives any period

(Rev. 3/87) 4

Page 16: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

of incarceration; or(b) Attached to probation orderif defendant is put on probationimmediately; andCc) Copy to Division of Paroleand Probation in split sentencecases.

Yellow — Court FilePink — State’s AttorneyCold — Defense Attorney

The sentencing judge and opposing counselshould have received or completed their copies ofthe worksheets prior to sentencing. When apresentence investigator fills in a worksheet, heshould send the judge the first four copies,together with the presentence investigation (PSI)and the Maryland Sentencing Guidelines Criteria forPrior Record. If no PSI is ordered, the judge willhave decided whc is to complete the forms.

At sentencing, the actual sentence and anychanges on the worksheet should be entered by thejudge and recorded by the two attorneys on theircopies.

After sentencing, the judge distributes theblue, green and yellow copies to the indicatedrecipients according to individual court practice.The Maryland Sentencing Guidelines Criteria forPrior Record form should accompany the blueworksheet sent to the Administrative Office of theCourts. In split sentence cases, the court shouldmake a copy of the worksheet for the appropriateprobation office. An institution receiving aprisoner eligible for parole will duplicate itsworksheet copy for the Parole Commission.

(Rev. 3/87) 5

Page 17: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

PART 2

USING THE GUIDELINES WORKSHEET

2.1 CASE INFORMATION

GeneralInfoznati on

The top section of the worksheet, as shown inTable 2, contains space for information importantfor purposes of both case identification andanalysis. The items requested are the offender’sname, sex, ethnicity, birthdate, jurisdiction wherethe case was tried, whether or not a PSI wasavailable, dates of offense and sentencing, numberof convicted offenses and criminal events at thesentencing being reported, the number of theworksheet and criminal event, the title of theinstant offense with its Maryland-Code article andsection number statutory maximum, and the case ordocket number.

Appendix D contains a numeric code for eachjurisdiction in the State. The code for thejurisdiction in which the defendant was triedshould be used.

TABLE 2CASE INFORMATION

MARYLAND SENTENCING OFlENOL* NAME ILNA

GUIDELINES WORKSHEET

DISPOSflTON TYPEPSI DATE OF OFFENOC bATE Of SINTENC100

‘.‘ 2

I I jl PINS ,OrN.m.nI SAte flaisreof

CONVICTEO CNIMINAI. IAT ntiSSENTENCING OFFENSE! EVENTS WOSESU

NUMIES OF — -

- I i I CRIMInAL EVENT A I —QNVICTED OFFENSE flftE AOC COOS MO COOL ANT. A SECTION MAS OOCEET NUMBER1st

2yd

I —

3rd

I —

ConvictedOffenses

Nwnbering ofWorksheets

In the space for the number of convictedoffenses at this sentencing write the total numberof offenses for which one judge must impose aspecific sentence at one time and place. Mergedoffenses should not be included as part of thistotal.

In the space for the number of criminal eventsat this sentencing, write the total number ofcriminal events being sentenced at this time. Asdefined earlier, a single criminal event is one ormore offenses committed in the course of the same

MOdlelF.e uI WNI. HItp.nIc ots. m.ISO,CT

-—

- I 2 1 2 3 4

2 PIn, no Agreement

3 CoUrt triI

4 Jury trial

(Rev. 3/87) 6

Page 18: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

transaction. Multiple criminal events beingsentenced together may have occurred on the same ordifferent dates. Offenses which occur on differentdates are almost always separate criminal events.

The block for the worksheet number andcriminal event number is intended to provideinformation as to the total number of convictedoffenses at a sentencing event. For sentencingsinvolving more than one criminal event, this blockshould also reflect the chronological order inwhich the events occurred and which offenses werepart of which event.

For a single convicted offense, the number ofconvicted offenses, the convicted offense number,and the criminal event number would all be “1”.(See sample case 1, page E—3.,)

For multiple convicted offenses the number ofconvicted offenses entered on the worksheet is thetotal number being sentenced at this sentencingevent. (See sample cases 4 through 8, pages E—11—E—35.)

For multiple offenses from more than onecriminal event, the number of criminal events isnumbered chronologically by date of offense. (Seesample case 6, page E—22.)

Spaces are provided on each worksheet forlisting up to three convicted offense titles for a

Conv-z-cted single criminal event (whether the same orOffense different docket numbers). Convicted offenseT-itle(s) titles and their corresponding Maryland code

references may be abbreviated but should be asspecific as possible. For example, the offensetitle for a drug violation (even if it is aconspiracy or attempt) should include the name ofthe drug and whether possession, distribution, etc.was involved. Property offenses should include anyrelevant dollar categories, such as “Theft Under$300” or “Extortion $300 or More”.

Spaces are provided at the bottom of theworksheet for the signature of the sentencing judgeand the person completing the worksheet.

The Sentencing The disposition type refers to the nature and

Judge Should circumstances of the conviction and sentencing.

Indicate Since the probation agent frequently lacks this

Disposition Type information, the sentencing judge should make sure

(Rev. 3/87) 7

Page 19: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

it is included. The disposition box, shown inTable 2, should be marked according to theconditions described there.

PleaAgreement

Plea., NoAgreement

If the disposition resulted from pleanegotiations, circle “1” and provide a briefdescription. Examples are: lesser charge, reducednumber of charges, binding plea agreement as toactual sentence, binding plea agreement as tosentence maximum or range, State recoinniendation asto sentence, and agreed statement of facts.

If the defendant pled guilty without anyagreement from the prosecutor or judge to performin a particular way, circle “2”.

If the disposition resulted from a courttrial, circle “3”.

If the disposition followed a trial by jury,circle “4”.

2.2 GUIDELINES SCORING

For offenses against persons, an offense scoreand an offender score must be computed for eachoffense to be sentenced. Since there are nospecial offense characteristics to be used indetermining the guidelines sentence for drug andproperty offenses, only an offender scqre needs tobe computed for them.

2.2.1 Computation of the Offense Score

Offense Score forOffenses AgainstPersons Only(Scinple Case 1.,

p. E-3)

The offense score for each convicted offenseis derived by totaling the points given for certainfactors of that offense. Items may be included ifknown to the judge even if not within the scope ofthe convicted offense, e.g., weapon usage in arobbery conviction or victim injury in a handgunviolation conviction.

A firearm offense is considered a personoffense under guidelines.

The four elements of the offense score appearin Table 3 below. A column of offense scores isprovided on the worksheet for each of threepossible offenses within a single criminal event.

CourtTrial

JuryTrial

(Rev. 3/87) 8

Page 20: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

TABLE 3 cOFFENSE SCORE

OFFENSE SCoRE(S (bffense Against a Person Only)let Ott 2nd Ott 3rd Off A. Sidousnus Cat.goy

01 01 01 V.VIl

03 03 03 = lv

05 05 05 = ill

08 08 08 = II

10 10 10 = IB. Victim Injury

0 0 0 = Nolnjury1 1 1 = No injury, Non-Permanent2 2 2 = Permanent Iniury or Death

C. Weapon Usag.0 0 0 = NoWeapon1 1 1 = Weapon Other Than Firearm2 2 2 = Firearm or Explosive

D. Sp.cIal Vulnerability of Victim0 0 0 = No

L_iLui_i O::NSE SCORE CS)

Following are a description and aninterpretation of the scoring for each offensefactor.

Seriousness A. Seriousness Category of the Convicted

Category Offense

Points are given on the basis of the- seriousness category of the convicted offense. In

Appendix A, page 24, Maryland criminal offenses arelisted alphabetically with Seriousness Categories.

Conspiracies A conspiracy, attempt or solicitation should

Attempts d be considered in the same seriousness category as

SoZ,icitations the substantive offense unless specificallyaddressed by separate statute (e.g., AttemptedArson, Article 27/10). Accessory before or after

Accessory the fact is considered to be one seriousnessBefore of After category below the substantive offense. Worksheetsthe Fact submitted for conspiracy, attempt. solicitation or

accessory should specify the substantive illegalactivity involved.

Victim Injury B. Victim Injury

Victim injury may be physical or mental. Thelatter must be based on confirmed medical diagnosis

(Rev. 3/87) 9

Page 21: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

or psychological treatment. For guidelinespurposes, mental injury is always to be considerednon—permanent.

In a multiple offense case, injury points aregiven only for the offense or offenses where avictim was injured.

Weapon Usage c. Weapon Usage

A weapon is any article or device whichreasonably appears capable of causing injury or anyarticle that could result in conviction under theconcealed weapons statute.

Ezplosives Explosives are to be considered the same asfirearms.

CO Gun3 Toy Weapons other than firearms include

Gu,, Starter incendiaries, knives, tire irons and clubs. CO2

Pistols guns (including pellet guns), toy pistols andstarter pistols are also scored as weapons otherthan firearms and receive one point.

Not included among weapons are automobiles,unless deliberately used as weapons; or parts ofthe body, e.g., hands or feet, unless the offenderis a professional in some form of self—defense.

Feigned Weapon If a weapon was feigned but no weapon wasactually present, the score would be “0” (no weaponused). -

Accessory After Any applicable guidelines points for weapon

the Fact usage should be given to an accessory before thefact but not to an accessory after the fact.

Especially D. Special Vulnerability of Victim

VulnerableVictim This item is designed to cover cases in which

the relative helplessness of the victim tends torender the actions of the perpetrator all the morebrutal or sadistic. An especially vulnerablevictim is anyone 10 years of age or less, 60 yearsof age or more, or physically or mentallyhandicapped. The handicap may be temporary orpermanent.

Total Offense To obtain an offense score, add the circledScore points in A, B, C and D for each person offense of

which the defendant was convicted. The maximumoffense score is 15; the minimum is 1.

(Rev. 3/87) 10

Page 22: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

2.2.2 Computation of the Offender Score

Offender’s The offender score is derived by totaling the

Criminal History points represented by the offender’s prior criminalhistory. The factors comprising this history areshown in Table 4 below.

TABLE 4

OFFENDER SCORE

QEEDER SCORE

_______

A. Relationship to CJS WhenInstant Count Occurred

o = None or Pending Cases

1 = Court or Other CriminalJustice Suoervision

B. Juvenile Delinquency

o = Not More Than OneFinding of Delinquencyor over age 25

1 = Two or More Findings, Noor One Commitment

2 = Two or More CoirtjojtenC. Prior Adult Criminal Record

o = None

1 = Minor

3 = Moderate

5=Ma;or

0. Prior Adult ParolelProballoiiViolations

= NoYes

j OFFENDER SCORE

Following are a description and interpretationof the scoring for each offender factor. Any priorcriminal activity which the defendant admits shouldbe included. Variables A, C and D refer only tothe defendant’s adult involvement with the criminaljustice system.

Offender under A. Relationship to CJS When Instant Offense

Criminal Justice Occurred

SupervisionIf the offender was in the criminal justice

system as the result of an adjudication of guilt asan adult, this factor should be scored as “1”. Thedefendant may have been on parole, probation,incarcerated, on work release, etc., at the timethe offense was committed.

(Rev. 3/87) 11

Page 23: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Juvenile B. Juvenile DelinquencyRecord

Findings of delinquency are counted the sameas convictions would be for an adult; that is,there may be more than one as part of a singleevent. An incarcerable traffic offense in whichthe court finds a juvenile involved should betreated as part of his or her juvenile record.

Commitments refer to the court’s assignment ofa juvenile to a correctional facility, large orsmall. Suspended juvenile commitments should becounted as findings of delinquency.

Age for If the offender was 26 or older at the time ofConsidering the instant offense, any juvenile record should beJuvenile Record excluded from consideration. An offender who had

reached his 26th birthday by the date of theoffense will be scored “0” whether or not he had ajuvenile record.

Adult Criminal C. Prior Adult Criminal RecordRecord

Use the Maryland Sentencing GuidelinesCriteria for Prior Record form to deteihnine theseverity of an offender’s prior criminal behavior.If an offender has never been convicted of acriminal offense, score “0”. Appendix B containsinstructions for calculating the number of offenderpoints for juvenile delinquency and whether anadult record, if any, should be considered minor (1point), moderate (3 points), or major (5 points).

D. Prior Adult Parole/Probation ViolationsParole orProbation Score “0” if offender has never before been onViolations adult parole or probation or has successfully

completed previous periods of supervision as anadult. Score one point if offender was everadjudicated in violation of parole or probation orwas convicted of an offense while on parole orprobation, unless the adjudication or convictionarose from the offense or offenses of thissentencing event. Do not give a point simplybecause offender was on parole or probation at thetime of the instant offense; he will already havebeen penalized in “A” for being under supervisionwhen he committed this offense.

Total Offense To obtain the total offender score, add theScore circled points in A, B, C and D. The maximum

offender score is “9”; the minimum is “0”.

(Rev. 3/87) 12

Page 24: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

2.3 DETERMINING THE GUIDELINES SENTENCE

After the offense and offender scores havebeen calculated for each offense for which there isa conviction or other adjudication of guilt, usethe appropriate matrix — person, drug, or property

to determine the guidelines range. (See Table

5.) In multiple offense cases, the overallguidelines range is determined after calculatingguidelines for the individual offenses (See pages15—20.) A sentence within the guidelines is asentence where the net unsuspended incarcerationafter the expiration of any previously imposedincarceration is within the guidelines.

TABLE 5

GUIDELINES RANGE

GUIDELINESRANGE

lot Often,.

TO

2nd Often..

Zr0 C3rd Offense

_____

To

OVERALLGUIDELINES

RANGE

(For MultipleCounts Only)

_____

TO

2.3.1 Actual SentenceJudge EntersActual Sentences At the time of sentencing, the actual sentence

is entered on the worksheet by the sentencingjudge. Complete sentencing information for eachconvicted offense includes: credit for time served,suspended time, length of probation, fine,restitution, and community service. (See Table 6)

C(Rev. 3/87) 13

Page 25: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

TABLE 6

ACTUAL SENTENCE

- ‘IL SENTENCE Imposed, suspended, probation, Subsequenttine, restitution, community service Offender

.,onvlcted Offense 1 Yes 2 ro

2nd ConvIcted Offense J 1 Yes 2 No

3rd ConvIcted Offense 1 Yes 2 No

A judge, who reconsiders his sentence within90 days, should notify the sentencing guidelinesoffice as to any change. Only the offender’s nameand docket number need to be given with the newsentence.

Offense Against 2.3.2 Person Offensesa Person(Sample Case 1, To find the guidelines sentence for an offensep. E—3) against a person, refer to Appendix Table C.la,

page C—i, or C.lb, page C—3. In Appendix C.ia, theguidelines ranges are in a grid format with theoffense score on the vertical axis and the offenderscore on the horizontal axis. The guidelines rangefor any given convicted offense is in the blockwhere the two scores intersect.

Appendix Table C.ib is an alternativepresentation. The various combinations of offenseand offender scores with their respectiveguidelines ranges are listed for any who finds thatformat preferable.

As was previously stated, the person offenseFirst Degree sentencing matrix is not necessary for First DegreeMurder Murder. The guidelines sentence for First Degree

Murder (unless the offender is being sentenced

(Rev. 3/87) 14

Page 26: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

pursuant to Article 27/413) is life.

2.3.3 Drug Offenses

Drua Offenses To find the guidelines sentence for a drug

(Sctriple Case 2 offense, refer to Appendix Table C.2a, page C—5, or

E7) ‘ C.2b, page C—7. In Appendix Table C.2a, theguidelines range for a particular instant offense

is in the block opposite the seriousness category

for that offense and under the applicable offender

score.

Appendix Table C.2b lists each drug seriousness category opposite the offender scores andguidelines ranges for each. When using this table,match the seriousness category of the convictedoffense to the offender score to find theguidelines sentence. Possession with Intent toDistribute is considered an offense under 27/286rather than 27/287.

The sale or possession of an unusally largeamount of drugs or evidence that the offender is anupper echelon dealer are aggravating factors thatshould be considered as reasons for sentencing

above the guidelines.

Property Offenses 2.3.4 Property Offenses(Scmrple Case 3,p.R—b) To find the guidelines sentence for a property

offense, refer to either Appendix Table C.3a, pageC—9, or C.3b, page C—li.

In Appendic Table C.3a, the guidelines rangefor a particular offense is in the block oppositethe seriousness category for that offense and underthe applicable offender score.

Appendix Table C.3b lists the guidelinesranges by seriousness category and offender score.To use this table, match the instant offenseseriousness category and the offender score to findthe guidelines sentence range.

Single Criminal 2.3.5 Multiple OffensesEvent, Not MoreThan One Seriousness 2,3.5.1 Scoring Single Criminal Events — Not MoreCategory I or II Than One Offense from Seriousness CategoryOffense I or t1 (See Table 7)

1. Calculate the guidelines range for eachoffense.

(Rev. 3/87) 15

Page 27: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

2. Determine the overall guidelines range byidentifying the highest of the lower guidelineslimit and the highest of the upper guidelineslimit. (Usually these will be the lower and upperlimits of the guidelines range for one of theoffenses, but there are infrequent exceptions. (SeeExample 3 in Table 7.)

TABLE 7

Example 1

Criminal Seriousness GuidelinesEvent Offense Category Range

1 Second Degree Rape II 12—25 Yrs.1 Handgun Violation III 5*_8 Yrs.

Overall guidelines range 12—25 Yrs.

Example 2

Criminal Seriousness GuidelinesEvent Offense Category Range

1 Burglary IV 1—4 Yrs.1 Theft $300 or More V 1—3 Yrs.1 Destroying Property VII 6M—1 Yr.

Overall guidelines range 1—4 Yrs.

. Example 3

Criminal Seriousness GuidelinesEvent Offense Category Range

1 Assault V 1—5 Yrs.1 Distribution of LSD IV 2—3 Yrs.

Overall guidelines range 2—5 Yrs.

*Guidelines range was 3—8 years but statutoryMinimum is 5 Years

3. Any combination of sentences imposingadditional net unsuspended incarceration within theoverall guidelines range means that the offenderhas been sentenced within the guidelines.

(Rev. 3/87) 16

Page 28: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Single Criminal 2.3.5.2 Scoring Single Criminal Events — Two orEvent3 Tho or More Offenses from Seriousness Category I CMore Seriozsness or II (See Table 8) -

Category I or IIOffenses 1. Calculate the guidelines range for each(Sample Case 5, offense.p. E-20)

2. Determine the overall guidelines range by

adding the guidelines ranges for each offense in

Seriousness Category I or II.

TABLE 8

Example 1

Criminal Seriousness GuidelinesEvent Offense Category Range

1 First Degree Rape I 15—25 Yrs.1 Kidnapping II 7—13 Yrs.

1- Robbery IV 2— 7 Yrs.

Overall guidelines range 22—38 Yrs.

Example 2

CCriminal Seriousness GuidelinesEvent Offense Category Range

1 1st Degree Sex Offense I 3OY—Life1 1st Degree Sex Offense I 30Y—Life1 1st Degree Rape I 3OY—Life

Overall guidelines range 9OY (Life+30 Yrs.)*to 3 conscLife terms

*60 years is considered equivalent to onesentence to life imprisonment.

3. Any combination of sentences imposing netunsuspended incarceration within the overallguidelines range means that the offender has beensentenced within the guidelines.

(Rev. 3/87) 17

Page 29: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Multiple Criminal 2.3.5.3 Scoring Multiple Criminal Events — One

Events, One Offense Offense in Each Event (See Table 9)

in Each Event1. Arrange the offenses in chronological order

beginning with the one coimnitted first.

2. Calculate the guidelines range for eachsuccessive criminal event. Prior criminal recordshould be computed as of the time of thissentencing event and is the same for each criminalevent.

3. Determine the overall guidelines range byadding the ranges for each event.

TABLE 9

Example 1

Criminal Seriousness GuidelinesEvent Offense Category Range

1 RDW III 3—8 Yrs.2 RDW III 3—8 Yrs.3 RDW III 3—8 Yrs.

Overall guidelines range 9—24 Yrs.

Example 2

Criminal Seriousness GuidelinesEvent Offense Category Range

1 Burglary IV 10—20 Yrs.2 Forgery V 8—10 Yrs.*

Overall guidelines range 18—30 Yrs.

*Statutory Maximum is 10 Years

4. Any combination of sentences imposingadditional net unsuspended incarceration within theoverall guidelines range means that the offenderhas been sentenced within the guidelines.

Multiple Criminal 2.3.5.4 Scoring Multiple — Criminal Events MoreEvents, More Thc than One Offense in One or More EventsOne Offense in at (See Table 10)

Least One Event1. Arrange the events in chronological order,

beginning with the offense or offenses committed in

(Rev. 3/87) 18

Page 30: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

the first event.

TABLE 10

Example 1

Criminal Seriousness GuidelinesEvent Offense Category Range

1 ROW III 6—12 Yrs.1 Handgun Violation III 6—12 Yrs.2 ROW III 6—12 Yrs.2 Poss. of Marijuana VII P—i Mo.

Overall guidelines range 12—24 Yrs.

Example 2

Criminal Seriousness GuidelinesEvent Offense Category Range

1 Sthse—breaking V P—6 Mos.2 Sthse—breaking V P—6 Mos.2 Theft $300 or More V P—6 Mos.2 Assault V P

Overall guidelines range P—lYr.

Example 3

Criminal Seriousness GuidelinesEvent Offense Category Range

1 1st Degree Rape I 10—18 Yrs.1 Robbery IV P—2 Yrs.2 Burglary IV P—i Yr.

Overall guidelines range 10—19 Yrs.

2. Calculate the guidelines range for eachoffense in the first event.

3. Determine the overall guidelines range forthe first criminal event as in 2.3.5.1 or 2.3.5.2,but do not enter it on a worksheet.

4. Follow steps 2 and 3 for each succeedingcriminal event. Prior criminal record should becomputed as of the time of this sentencing eventand is the same for each criminal event. (

(Rev. 3/87) 19

Page 31: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

5. After determining the overall guidelinesrange for each criminal event, the ranges are addedto determine the overall guidelines range for theentire case.

6. Any combination of sentences imposingadditional net unsuspended incarceration within theoverall guidelines range means that the offenderhas been sentenced within the guidelines.

2.3.6 Presentence Detention

When a defendant has been incarcerated priorCred-z,t for

to sentencing, this detention should be indicatedTime Serveci ,,

under Actual Sentence by the judge. Either thenumber of days credit for time served or the datefrom which the sentence is to run should be given.

2.3.7 Mandatory Sentences

Statutory If the guidelines sentence range exceeds theMaximums coid statutory maximum for a given offense, the

Minimums statutory maximum becomes the upper limit of the(Sajnple Case 8, guidelines range. If the guidelines sentence range

is below the mandatory statutory minimum, thatminimum becomes the lower limit of the guidelinesrange.

2.3.8 Subsequent Offenses

Second or Enhanced punishment legislation for subsequentSubsequent offenders also takes precedence over guidelines

Offenses ranges if not otherwise provided for in thisManual. When the statutory penalty for a drugoffense is doubled under Article 27, Section 293,the guidelines range for that offense is alsodoubled. The guidelines sentence is determined bydoubling the appropriate sentence from the drugoffense sentencing matrix except when the mandatoryminimum sentence under 27/286 is invoked and takesprecedence.

If sentencing is pursuant to an enhancedpunishment statute, mark the box provided on theworksheet and specify the statute.

2.3.9 “White Collar” Offenses“Wh-cte CollarCrimes The guidelines apply to white collar offenses.

However, it is pointed out and emphasized that thepresence of a white collar offense should be viewedas an aggravating factor which may lead the

(Rev. 3/87) 20

Page 32: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

sentencing judge to exceed the applicableguidelines. A white collar offense is defined as Cfollows:

The offense was a major economic offense,identified as an illegal act or series of illegalacts committed by other than physical means and byconcealment or guile to obtain money or property,to avoid payment or loss of money or property, orto obtain business or professional advantage.

C

C(Rev. 3/87) 21

Page 33: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

APPENDIX A

MARYLAND CRIMINAL OFFENSES

ALPHABETICAL LISTING

Seriousness Article and Type of MaximumOffense Category Code Section Offense Penalty

Abduction

Child under twelve III 27/2 Person 20 Years

Child by relative VII FL 9—304,7(a)(b) Person 30 Days304,7(c) Person 1 Year

Arson

Attempted, propertyin 27/6 or 7 V 27/10(a) Property 10 Years

Attempted, propertyin 27/8 or 9 VII 27/10(b) Property 2 Years

Barn, pier, shop,church, bridge, etc. IV 27/7 Property 20 Years

Burning cross See Burning cross or other religious symbol

Burning goods, wares,etc., with intent toinjure insurer VII 27/9 Property 5 Years

Burning personalproperty of another—damage under $1,000 VII 27/8(b) Property 18 Months

Burning personalproperty of anotherdamage $1,000 or more VI 27/8(c) Property 5 Years

Dwelling or adjoiningbuilding III 27/6 Property 30 Years

Setting fire whileperpetrating a crime VII 27/11 Property 3 Years

Assault and/or Battery V CL Person

Assault on Division ofCorrection/Patuxent Inst. /jail/detention center Consec.inmate or employee IV 27/liE Person No susp.

(Rev. 3/87)

A-i

Page 34: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Seriousness Article and Type of Maximum

Offense Category Code Section Offense Penalty

Assault with deadly weapon V Federal Offense Person

Assault with intent to —

Maim, disable, etc. III 27/386 Person 10 Years

Murder II 27/12 Person 30 Years

Prevent lawfulapprehension III 27/386 Person 10 Years

Rape or commit a 1st or2nd degree sex offense III 27/12 Person 15 Years

Rob IV 27/12 Person 10 Years

Bad check

Obtaining property!services under $300 VII 27/141,143(b) Property 18 Months

Obtaining property!services worth $300 ormore V 27/141,143(a) Property 15 Years C

Bawdy houses and housesof ill fame See Prostitution

Breaking and entering —

Breaking and enteringdwelling house ofanother VII 27/31A Property 3 Years

Breaking and enteringto place or removeequipment See Wiretapping

Breaking an enteringrailroad car, etc. withintent to steal VI 27/114 Property 10 Years

Breaking and enteringstorehouse, etc., ofanother VII 27/31B Property 6 Months

Breaking into railroadcar or entering by force VI 27/115 Property 10 Years

(Rev. 3/87)

A- 2

Page 35: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Seriousness Article and Type of MaximumOffense Category Code Section Offense Penalty

Burglary IV 27/29,30(a),CL Property 20 Years

Burglary with explosives II 27/34,35 Property 40 Years

Daytime housebreaking IV 27/30(b) Property 10 Years

Housebreaking, statutorynighttime (burglary) IV 27/29,30(a) Property 20 Years

Storehouse—breaking, day!night, with intent tocommit a felony V 27/32 Property 10 Years

Storehouse—breaking withintent to steal under$300 or stealing under $5 VII 27/33A Property 18 Years

Storehouse—breaking /stealing $5 or more V 27/33 Property 10 Years

Bribery to/by publicofficer V 27/23 Property 12 Years

Burglary See Breaking and entering

Burning See Arson

Burning cross or otherreligious symbol V 27/bA Person 3 Years

Child abduction See Abduction

Child abuse

Physical IV 27/35A Person 15 Years

Sexual IV 27/35A Person 15 Years

Child pornography V 27/419A Person 10 Years

Contempt, criminal’ VII CL

Contraband, deliveryin or out of institution

To effect escape VI 27/122A(b) Property 10 Years

(Rev. 3/87)

A- 3

Page 36: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Seriousness Article and Type of Maximum

Offense Category Code Section Offense Penalty (Other than to effectescape VI 27/122A(c) Property 3 Years

Contributing to certainconditions of a child VII CJ3—831 Person 3 Years

Controlled dangeroussubstance — Importationinto State III 27/286A Drug 25 Years

Controlled dangeroussubstance — unlawfulmanufacture, distribution,counterfeiting, etc.;manufacture, etc. of certainequipment for illegal use;keeping common nuisance

Non—controlled substanceas a CDS IV 27/286B Drug 5 Years

PC? III 27/286(a)(b) Drug 20 Years(2) (10 yrs.

mandatory /subsequentoffenseunder thispara.)

Schedule I—Il narcotics 20 Years(e.g., heroin, cocaine, (10 yrs.dilaudid, methadone) III 27/286(a)(b) Drug mandatory!

(1) subsequentoffenseunder thispara.)

Schedule I—Il non—narc.& Sched. 111—V CDS 5 Years(e.g., amphetamines, LSD, (2 Yearsmarijuana, diazepam, mandatory!

valium, placidyl, subsequentmethaqualine) IV 27/286(a)(b)(3) Drug offense

under thispara.)

Using minors for CDSdistribution, etc. III 27/286C Drug 10 Years

L(Rev. 3/87)

A- 4

Page 37: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Seriousness Article and Type of MaximumOffense Category Code Section Offense Penalty

Controlled dangeroussubstance — Paraphernalia

Delivery or sale, etc.1st offense VII 27/287A(d)(1) Drug $500 Fine

Delivery or sale,subsequent offense IV 27/287A(d)(1) Drug 2 Years

Delivery or sale tojuvenile by adult 3 ormore years older III 27/287A(d)(2) Drug 8 Years

Unlawful Possession, etc. V 27/287 Drug 4 Years

Use or possession withintent to use, 1stoffense VII 27/287A(c) Drug $500 Fine

Use or possession withintent to use, subsequentoffense V 27/287A(c) Drug 2 Years

Controlled dangeroussubstance — Possession, etc.

Marijuana (hashish &cannabis) VII 27/287 Drug 1 Year

Other than marijuana V 27/287 Drug 4 Years

Controlled dangerous Twicesubstance — 2nd or Otherwisesubsequent offense 27/293 Drug Authorized

PenaltyCredit card offense —

fraud, theft, forgery

Under $300 VII 27/145 Property 8 Months

$300 or more V 27/145 Property 15 Years

Continuing course of conduct. — If a person commits a violation ofthis section pursuant to one scheme or continuing course of conduct,from the same or several sources, the conduct may be considered asone offense and the value of the money, goods, services, or anythingelse of value may be aggregated in determining if the offense is afelony or a misdemeanor.

(Rev. 3/87)

A- 5

Page 38: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Seriousness Article and Type of Maximum

Offense Category Code Section Offense Penalty

Cruelty to animals

Dogfighting VI 27/59 Property 3 Years

Injuring a racehorse VI 27/61 Property 3 Years

Daytime housebreaking See Breaking and entering

Deadly weapon See Explosives, handguns and weapons

Destroying, injuring, etc.property

Under $300 VII 27/111 Property 60 Days

$300 or more VII 27/111 Property 3 Years

Dynamiting, etc., property III 27/119 Property Life!20 Years

Escape

From State pen., a jail,station house, etc. IV 27/139(a)(1)(3) Person 10 Years

Aid in escape IV 27/139(c) Person 10 Years

Explosives

Destructive explosivedevices, manufacture,possession, etc. III 27/139B Property 10 Years

Molotov cocktail VII 27/139A Property 5 Years

Possession without aLicense VI 38A/29,34 Property 5 Years

Unlawful manufacture ordealing VI 38A/27,34 Property 5 Years

Extortion

By false accusation VI 27/563 Property 2 Years

By state or local officeror employee againstanother employee VI 27/562D Property 5 Years

C(Rev. 3/87)

A- 6

Page 39: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Seriousness Article and Type of MaximumOffense Category Code Section Offense Penalty

By state or local officergenerally

Under $300 VII 27/562C Property 6 Months

$300 or more V 27/562C Property 10 Years

Generally

Under $300 VII 27/562B Property 18 Months

$300 or more V 27/562B’ Property 10 Years

Sending, etc. athreatening letter, etc. VI 27/561 Property 10 Years

Threatening verbally VI 27/562 Property 10 Years

Failure to appear’

For a felony, pendingappeal, post conviction,etc. V 27/12B 5 Years

For a misdemeanor VII 27/12B 1 Year

False alarm—fire, accident,rescue V 27/156 Property 5 Years

False imprisonment V CL Person.

False statements, etc. VII 27/150,151 Property 6 Months27/151A,151B Property 1 Year

Falsely representingself as an attorney See Fraud

Falsifying ,destroying,concealing, accessing,etc., public records See Forgery

Federal income tax evasion’ VII

Firearm See Handgun

Forgery and uttering

(Rev. 3/87)

A- 7

Page 40: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Seriousness Article and Type of MaximumOffense Category Code Section Offense Penalty (Falsifying, destroying,concealing, accessing, etc.public records VII 27/45A Property 3 Years

Forgery, counterfeiting,etc. V 27/44(a)/CL Property 10 Years

Forgery, counterfeiting,etc. of public documents V 27/45 Property 10 Years

Uttering, etc. V 27/44(b)/CL Property 10 Years

Forgery, etc. physician’sprescriptions, etc. VI 27/55 Property 2 Years

Fraud

Falsely representing selfas an attorney VII 10/33 Property 6 Months

Home Improvement VII 56/261,268 Property 6 MonthsIncome tax

False or fraudulentreturn VII 81/302 Property 1 Year

Principal = Perjury IV 81/302(a) Property 10 Years

Agent or Representative VII 81/302(b) Property 1 Year(prior to 7/1/84 — 6.months max)

Employer’s failure topay VII 81/312,312A Property 1 Year

Wilful failure tofurnish information VI 81/221 Property 18 Months

Medicaid

Under $500 VII 27/230B,C,D Property 3 Years

$500 or more V 27/230B,C,D Property 5 Years

Misappropriation of fundsby attorney V 10/44 Property 5 Years

Misappropriation Byfiduciaries $500 or more V 27/132 Property 5 Years (

(Rev. 3/87)

A- 8

Page 41: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Seriousness Article and Type of Maximum

Offense Category Code Section Offense Penalty

Obtaining publicassistance by fraud VII 27/230A Property 3 Years

Unlawfully receiving feefor advice as attorney (See “V” section for other information)

Welfare perjury VII 88A/62/CL Property 10 Years

Gambling

Betting, wagering, etc.;pools on horses, etc. VII 27/240 Property 1 Year

Keeping gaming table orplace VII 27/237,241 Property 1 Year

Lotteries — prohibited VII 27/356,357,358 Property 1 Year360,361,362

Handgun

Carrying, etc., withintent to injure or kill V 27/36B(b)(iv) Person 5 Years

Pistols and revolvers—restrictions on sale, 27/445,446,447,transfer and possession VI 447A, 448 Person 3 Years

Short—barrelled riflesand shotguns, unlawfulposs. VI 27/481C Person 5 Years

Unlawful wearing, VII 27/36B(b)(i) Person 3 Years

carrying, etc. 1st (Mand. 90

weapon offense Days if onpublicschoolprop.)

Unlawful wearing, 10 Years

carrying, etc., (Mand. 1 Yr.

2nd weapon offense III 27/36B(b)(ii) Person Mand. 3Yrs. if onpub licschoolprop.)

(Rev. 3/87)

A-9

Page 42: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

OffenseSeriousnessCategory

Article andCode Section

Type of MaximumOffense Penalty C

Unlawful wearing,carrying, etc., morethan 2 prior weaponoffenses

Unlawful use incommission of felonyor crime of violence,1st offense

III

10 Years(Mand. 3 Yrs.

27/36B(b)(iii) Person Mand. 5Yrs. ifon publicschoolprop.)

20 Years(Mand. 5

III 27/363(d)(1) Person Years)(Prior to 7/1/82 — 15 Years Maximum)

Unlawful use incommission of felonyor crime of violencesubsequent offense

Wearing, carrying whileintoxicated

II

VI

27/36B(d) (2)

27/36E(l)

20 Years(Mand. 5

Person YearsConsec.)

Person 1 Year

Hinder police officer VI

Homicide by motor vehiclewhile intoxicated VI 27/388A

C

Incest

Income tax fraud

V 27/335

See Fraud

Person 10 Years

Indecent exposure

Inhaling harmful substanceInterference, obstructionor false representation offirefighter, rescue squad

VI

member or emergency servicespersonnel VII

Interfering with the rightsof a mentally retardedindividual VII

27/335A Person 3 Years

Kidnapping II 27/337,338 Person 30 Years

Lotteries See Gambling ((Rev. 3/87)

CL Person

Person 3 Years

See Smelling or inhaling harmful substance

27/liD Person 3 Years

HG 7-1102 Person 2 Years

A- 10

Page 43: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Seriousness Article and Type of Maximum

Offense Category Code Section Offense Penalty

Malfeasance, misconduct Person,in office V CL Property

or Drug

Maiming

Malicious injury totongue, nose, eye,limb, etc. III 27/385 Person 10 Years

Mayhem; tarring andfeathering III 27/384 Person 10 Years

Unlawful shooting,stabbing, assaulting,etc. with intent tomaim, etc. or preventlawful apprehension III 27/386 Person 10 Years

Manslaughter

Involuntary IV 27/387/CL Person 10 Years

Voluntary IV 27/387/CL Person 10 Years

By automobile, etc. VI 27/388 Person 5 Years

Medicaid fraud See Fraud

Misappropriation byfiduciaries See Fraud

Molotov cocktail See Explosives

Motor vehicle offenses2 VII

But see also Manslaughter by automobile, Homicide by motorvehicle while intoxicated, & Unauthorized use

Murder

Attempted III CL Person Life or 30Years

Felony Murder3 I CL Person Life/Death

1st Degree3 I 27/407,412(b), Person Life/Death413

2nd Degree II 27/411,412(c) Person 30 Years

(Rev. 3/87)

A-il

Page 44: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Seriousness Article and Type of MaximumOffense Category Code Section Offense Penalty (

Solicitation II CL Person

Obstructing Justice V 27/27 Person 3 Years

Pandering VI 27/426 Person 12 Years

Perjury, welfare See Fraud

Perjury or subornationof perjury IV 27/438,439 Person 10 Years

Perverted sexual practices VII 27/554 Person 10 Years

Pistol or revolver See Handgun

Poisoning -

Attempted II 27/450 Person 10 Years

Contaminating water,food, etc. II 27/451 Person 20 Years

Pollutants, dispersing into (State waters

1st Offense VII Health Property 1 Year

Subsequent offense VII Environmental Property 2 Years

Falsification VII 9—322,343 Property 6 Months

Prescription drugs —

manufacture, distribute,etc,; obtain by fraud,etc., forge, etc. label VI 27/300(a)—(h) Property 2 YearsProperty, destruction See Destroying property

Prostitution, keeping, etc.

Bawdy houses and housesof ill fame VI 27/15,17 Property 1 Year

Solicitation, etc. VII 27/15,17 Property 1 Year

Public assistance,obtaining by fraud See Fraud, Welfare perjury

Rape- (

(Rev. 3/87)

A- 12

Page 45: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Seriousness Article and Type of MaximumOffense Category Code Section Offense Penalty

1st Degree I 27/462/CL Person Life

2nd Degree II 27/463 Person 20 Years

Resisting arrest VI CL Person

Rioting IV CL Person

Rogue and vagabond VII 27/490 Property 3 Years

Robbery IV 27/486/CL Person 10 Years

Robbery with a deadlyweapon III 27/488/CL Person 20 Years

Sabotage V 27/536,537 Property 10 Years

Attempted VI 27/538 Property 5 Years

Serial numbers, removing,etc. VII 27/389 Property 1 Year

Sex offense —

1st Degree I 27/464 Person Life

2nd Degree II 27/464A Person 20 Years

3rd Degree V 27/464B Person 10 Years

4th Degree VII 27/464C Person 1 Year

Short—barrelled riflesand shotguns See Handgun

Smelling or inhalingharmful substances VII 27/301 Drug 6 Months

Involving minors VII 27/301A Drug 18 Months

Subsequent Offense VII 27/301A Drug 3 Years

Sodomy V 27/553 Person 10 Years

Solicitation for prostitution See Prostitution

Storehouse breaking See Breaking and Entering

Telephone, unlawful use VII 27/555A Property 3 Years

(Rev. 3/87)

A- 13

Page 46: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Seriousness Article and Type of Maximum COffense Category Code Section Offense Penalty

Theft4

Under $300 VII 27/342(f)(2) Property 18 Months

$300 or more V 27/342(f)(1) Property 15 Years

Threatening letter, sending,etc. See Extortion

Traffic Offenses2 VII

Unauthorized use oflivestock, vehicle, etc. V 27/349 Property 4 Years

Unnatural & pervertedsexual practices See Perverted sexual practices

Uttering See Forgery and uttering

Weapons See also Explosives and Handguns

Carrying openly with Cintent to injure VII 27/36 Person 3 Years

Carrying, or wearingconcealed, etc. VII 27/36 Person 3 Years

Carrying or possessingDeadly weapon on schoolproperty VI 27/36A Peison 3 Years

Welfare fraud See Fraud

Welfare perjury See Fraud

Wiretapping

Breaking and enteringto place or removeequipment V CJ1O—412 Property 10 Years

Unlawful interception ofcommunications V CJ1O—402 Property 5 Years

Wires and conduits, unauthorized connections,etc. VII 27/194 Property 6 Months

(Rev. 3/87)

A- 14

Page 47: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

‘This offense is not covered by guidelines and does not require thesubmission of a worksheet. It is listed here for purposes of computingAdult Prior Criminal Record only.

2All those punishable by terms of incarceration. See Title 27/101—105 of the Transportation Article of the Code of Maryland.

3First Degree Murder is listed in Seriousness Category I, and

offense and offender scores should be computed, but the guidelinessentence for First Degree Murder is always life, unless Article 27/413(Death Penalty) is invoked.

41n 1978, a comprehensive theft statute replaced the previouslyseparate designation of offenses such as Larcency, Larcency by Trick,Larceny after Trust. Embezzlement, False Pretenses, Shoplifting, andReceiving Stolen Goods. For purposes of guidelines, the old offensesshould be considered “Theft under $300” if they were misdemeanors and“Theft $300 or More” if they were felonies.

(Rev. 3/87)

15

Page 48: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

APPENDIX B

CLASSIFICATION OF THE PRIOR ADULT CRIMINAL RECORD

PROCEDURES

If the offender has ever been convicted of an offense as anadult or received an adjudication of guilt, use the criteria inTable B.1 (p. B—3) or B.2 (pp. B—6—B—7) before completing theworksheet for each criminal event to determine whether the priorrecord for that criminal event should be considered Minor,Moderate or Major. Using the Criteria for Prior Record form (p.B—4) to record the details of prior record information will makeworksheet tabulation simpler and more accurate. The procedure forthe proper use of Table B.1 consists of the following steps:

1. Count the number of prior adjudications of guilt accordingto the Seriousness Categories in Appendix A.

2. Taking the number of adjudications in the most seriouscategory of offenses, refer to Table B.1 and locate theblock containing the number of convictions for thatseriousness category.

3. Use the criteria in the identified block to classify therecord as Minor, Moderate or Major.

Table B.2 may be used instead of Table B.1 to classify aprior record. It is simply a verbal description of Table B.1

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS

- Prior Adult Criminal Record

The prior adult criminal record includes all adjudications ofguilt preceding the current sentencing event, whether theoffense(s) was committed before or after the instant one.Probations before judgment (PBJ) and convictions under the FederalYouth Corrections Act (FYCA) are included unless expunged from therecord. (If a PBJ or FYCA conviction appears in the defendant’srecord, it has not been expunged.) Not considered part of a prioradult criminal record are public local laws, municipalinfractions, contempt, criminal non—support, and non—incarcerabletraffic offenses. If the seriousness category of a Marylandoffense is not in the Manual, use Seriousness Category VII.

Different Criminal Events Sentenced Together

If multiple offenses from different criminal events are beingsentenced together at this sentencing event, the offender’scriminal record will include any adjudication of guilt prior to

(Rev.3/87)

B-i

Page 49: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

the current sentencing and will be the same for each offense beingsentenced at this time. C

Convictions Out of State

If an offender has ever been convicted out of state, theoffense should be matched as closely as possible to a Marylandoffense. If no Maryland counterpart exists, the offense should becounted in the lowest seriousness category, VII, and thesentencing judge should be informed.

Theft—Type Offenses

In 1978, a comprehensive theft statute replaced thepreviously separate designation of offenses such as Larceny,Larceny by Trick, Larceny after Trust, Embezzlement, FalsePretenses, Shop— lifting, and Receiving Stolen Goods. Forpurposes of guidelines, the old offenses should be considered“Theft under $300” if they were misdemeanors and “Theft $300 orMore” if they were felonies.

Criminal Record Decay Factor

If an offender has lived in the community for at least tenyears prior to the instant offense without parole or probationsupervision and without any adjudication of guilt, his criminalrecord should be lowered one level: from Major to Moderate, from CModerate to Minor, or from Minor to None.

Conspiracies, Attempts and Solicitations

Conspiracies, attempts and solicitations should be consideredin the same seriousness category as the substantive offense unlessspecifically addressed by separate statute (e.g., Attempted Arson,27/10). Accessory before or after the fact is considered to beone seriousness category below the substantive offense.

C(Rev.3/87)

B- 2

Page 50: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

APPENDIX TABLE B.1.

CRITERIA FOR PRIOR ADULT CRIMINAL RECORD

NUMBER OF CONVICTIONS

1 2 3 4 5-9

Major Major Major Major Major Major

10 or more

I)

uJzCl)D0

LU(/)

II

III

IV

V

VI

VII

Major if combinedwithanyoffensesinCategories III - Viorany 5 offenses Major Major Major Major Maior

Moderate

Major if combinedwith two or moreoffenses inCategories IV-VI, or

Major Major Major Major Majorany 6 offenses

Moderate

Major if combined Major if combinedwith 3 or more with 1 or moreoffenses from offenses from•Categories V or VI, Categories V or VI,or any 7 offenses or any 6 offenses Major Major Major Major

Moderate Moderate —

Major if combined Major if combined Maior f combined Major if combinedwith any 8 offenses with any7 offenses with any 6 offenses with any 5 offenses

Moderateifcom- Moderateifcom- —

bined with not less bined with not lessthan 3, nor more than 1, nor more

Major MajrModerate Moderatethan 7 offenses than 6 offenses

Minor Minor

Major if combined Major if combined Major if combined Major if combined Major if totalwith any9 offenses with anyS offenses with any 7 offenses with any6offenses number of convic

tions is equal to orModerate if corn- Moderate if com- Moderate if com- greater than 10bined with not less bined with not less bined with not lessthan 4, nor more than 3, nor more than 2, nor more — — — — —

than 8 offenses than 7 offenses than 7 offenses— — Moderate Moderate

Minor Minor Minor

Minor Minor Minor - Minor Moderate Major

B- 3

Page 51: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

ARYLAND SENTENCING GUIDELINES Offender’s Name Docket Number

RITERIA FOR PRIOR RECORD

- __________________________________________________________________

UVENILE DELINQUENCY Offense Title (With finding of Delinquency) Commitment Date

Offender 26 or

ider when current Cffense committed

J Not more than 1 Finding E 2 or more Findings/i Commitment 2 or more Commitments

DULT CONVICTIONS Offense Title (Code Art. & Sec., if available) Disp. Date Sentence

Seriousness

Category

I

Seriousness

Category

IIINo.

Seriousness

Category

III

jNo._

Seriousness

Category

IV

.

-- CjNo

Seriousness

Category

V

INo.Seriousness

Category

VI1No.

Seriousness

Category

VII

1N0._ C

E None Minor Moderate - JMajor

ompleted By

A- 4

Page 52: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Ma.jorRecord

APPENDIX TABLE B.2

DESCRIPTION

An offender who has been found guilty of one ormore offenses in the past as an adult is considered tohave a major adult criminal record if his or her recordcontains:

o One or more Seriousness Category I offenses.

o One Seriousness Category II offense, combinedwith:One or more offenses from Seriousness CategoryIII — VI, orAny other five offenses.

o Two or more Seriousness Category II offenses.

o One Seriousness Category III offense, combinedwith:Two or more offenses from Seriousness CategoryIV - VI, orAny other six offenses.

o Two or more Seriousness Category III offenses.

o One Seriousness Category IV offense, combinedwith:Three or more offenses from Seriousness CategoryV or VI, orAny other seven offenses.

o Two Seriousness Category IV offenses, combinedwith:One or more offenses from Seriousness Category Vor VI, orAny other six offenses.

o Three or more Seriousness Category IV offenses.

o One Seriousness Category V offense, combinedwith any other eight offenses.

o Two Seriousness Category V offenses, combinedwith any other seven offenses.

o Three Seriousness Category V offenses, combinedwith any other six offenses.

o Four Seriousness Category V offenses, combinedwith any other five offenses.

(Rev.3/87)

B- 5

Page 53: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

o Five or more Seriousness Category V offenses.

o Ten or more adjudications of guilt from anycombination of seriousness categories.

An offender who has been found guilty of one ormore offenses in the past as an adult is considered to

Moderate have a moderate record if he or she does not meet any ofRecord the criteria for a major record, but whose record

contains:

o One Seriousness Category II offense.

o One Seriousness Category III offense.

o One or two Seriousness Category IV offenses.

o One Seriousness Category V offense, combinedwith not less than three nor more than sevenother offenses.

o Two Seriousness Category V offenses, combinedwith not less than one nor more than six otheroffenses.

o Three or four Seriousness Category V offenses.

o One Seriousness Category VI offense, combinedwith not less than four nor more than eightother offenses.

o Two Seriousness Category VI offenses, combinedwith not less than three nor more than sevenother offenses.

o Three Seriousness Category VI offenses, combinedwith not less than two nor more than six otheroffenses.

o Not less than four nor more than nine SeriousnessCategory VI offenses.

o Not less than five nor more than nine SeriousnessCategory VII offenses.

An offender who has been found guilty as an adultof one or more offenses in the past, but does not meet

Minor the criteria for either a major or a moderate record isRecord considered to have a minor record.

C(Rev.3/87)

B- 6

Page 54: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

APPENDIX TABLE C. ia

SENTENCING MATRIX FOR OFFENSES AGAINST PERSONS

Offender Score

Offense0 1 2 3 4 • 5 6 7 or more

Score

1 P P P- 3M 3M-il 3M-i 8M 3M- 21 6M- 21 ii- 31

2 P-6M P-il P-i8M 3M-21 674-31 11-51 i8M-51 31-81

3 P-21 P-21 6M-31 iI-51 21-51 31-71 41-81 51-i 01

4 P—SI 6M-41 11-51 21-51 31-71 41-81 51-i01 51-121

5 3M-41 6M-5’ 11-61 21-71 31-81 41-iOI 61-121 81-151

6 11—61 21—71 31—81 41—91 51—i 01 71—121 81—131 101—201

7 31—81 41—91 51—101 61—121 71—151 91—i41 101—i 51 121—201

8 41—91 51—101 51—121 71—i 31 81—i 51 101—181 121—201 151—251

9 51—101 71—1 31 81—151 101—151 121—181 151—251 181—201 201—301

iO iOI—181 101—211 i21—251 i51—251 i51—301 181—301 201—351 201—L

ii 121—201 151—251 i81—251 201—301 201—301 251—351 251—4 01 251—L

i2 151—251 181—251 181—301 201—351 201—351 251—401 251—L 251—L

13 201-301 251-351 251-401 251-L 251-L 301-L L L

14 201-L 251-L 281-L 301-L L L L I,

15 251-L 301-L 351-L L L L L L

P=Probation M=Months 1=lear L=Life

(Rev. 3/87) C-i

Page 55: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private
Page 56: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

APPENDIX TABLE C.lb

SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR OFFENSES AGAINST PERSONS

OFFENSE OFFENDER GUIDELINE OFFENSE OFFENDER GUIDELINESCORE SCORE RANGE SCORE SCORE RANGE

1 0 P 6 0 1Y—6Y1 1 P 6 1 2Y—7Y1 2 P—3M 6 2 3Y—8Y1 3 3M—1Y 6 3 4Y—9Y1 4 3M—18M 6 4 5Y—1OY1 5 3M—2Y 6 5 7Y—12Y1 6 6M—2Y 6 6 8Y—13Y1 7+ 1Y—3Y 6 7+ 1OY—2OY

2 0 P—6M 7 0 3Y—8Y2 1 P—1Y 7 1 4Y—9Y2 2 P—18M 7 2 5Y—1OY2 3 3M—2Y 7 3 6Y—12Y2 4 6M—3Y 7 4 7Y—13Y2 5 1Y—5Y 7 5 9Y—14Y2 6 18M—5Y 7 6 1OY—15Y2 7+ 3Y—8Y 7 7+ 12Y—20Y

3 0 P—2Y 8 0 4Y—9Y3 1 P—2Y 8 1 5Y—1OY3 2 6M—3Y 8 2 5Y—12Y3 3 1Y—5Y 8 3 7Y—13Y3 4 2Y—5Y 8 4 8Y—15Y3 5 3Y—7Y 8 5 1OY—18Y3 6 4Y—8Y 8 6 12Y—20Y3 7+ 5Y—1OY 8 7+ 15Y—25Y

4 0 P—3Y 9 0 5Y—1OY4 1 6M—4Y 9 1 7Y—13Y4 2 1Y—5Y 9 2 8Y—15Y4 3 2Y—5Y 9 3 1OY—15Y4 4 3Y—7Y 9 4 12Y—18Y4 5 4Y—8Y 9 5 15Y—25Y4 6 5Y—1OY 9 6 18Y—30Y4 7+ 6Y—12Y 9 7+ 2OY—30Y

5 0 3M—4Y 10 0 1OY—18Y5 1 6M—5Y 10 1 1OY—21Y5 2 1Y—6Y 10 2 12Y—25Y5 3 2Y—7Y 10 3 15Y—25Y5 4 3Y—8Y 10 4 15Y—3OY5 5 4Y—1OY 10 5 18Y—30Y5 6 6Y—12Y 10 6 2OY—35Y5 7+ 8Y—15Y 10 7+ 2OY—L

(Rev. 3/87)

C- 3

Page 57: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

APPENDIX TABLE C.lb(Continued)

SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR OFFENSES AGAINST PERSONS

OFFENSE OFFENDER GUIDELINE OFFENSE OFFENDER GUIDELINE

SCORE SCORE RANGE SCORE SCORE RANGE

11 0 12Y—20Y 14 0 2OY—L

11 1 15Y—25Y 14 1 25Y—L

11 2 18Y—25Y 14 2 28Y—L

11 3 2OY—3OY 14 3 3OY—L

11 4 2OY—3OY 14 4 L

11 5 25Y—35Y 14 5 L

11 6 25Y—40Y 14 6 L

11 7+ 25Y—L 14 7+ L

12 0 15Y—25Y 15 0 25Y—L

12 1 18Y—25Y 15 1 3OY—L

12 2 18Y—30Y 15 2 35Y—L

12 3 2OY—35Y 15 3 L

12 4 2OY—35Y 15 4 L

12 5 25Y—40Y 15 5 L

12 6 25Y—L 15. 6 L

12 7+ 25Y—L 15 7+ L

13 0 2OY—30Y C13 1 25Y—35Y13 2 25Y—4OY13 3 25Y—L13 4 25Y—L13 5 3OY—L13 6 L13 7+ L

C(Rev. 3/87)

C- 4

Page 58: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

APPENDIX TABLE C. 2a

SENTENcING MATRIX FOR DRUG OFFENSES

OFFENDER SCORE

OFFENSE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 or more

SERIOUSNESSCATEGORY P P P F- 2M F- 3M F— 614 3M- 614 GM- 2 3M

VII

SERIOUSNESSCATEGORY P- GM P-i 214 3M-i 2M GM-i 814 21-21 1. 51-2. 51 21-31 31-41

V

SERIOUSNESSCATEGORY P-12M F-18M 614-1814 11-21 1. 51-2.51 21-31 3I-4Y 3. 51-51

IV

SERIOUSNESSCATEGORY 614-31 11-31 1814-41 31-71 41-81 51-101 71-141 121-201

HI

EXCEPTIMPORTATION

SERIOUSNESSATEGOR1

III 11-41 21-51 31-61 41-71 51-81 61-101 81-151 151-251

IMPORTATION

P=Probation M=Mc’nths Y=Yecr”s

(Rev. 7/8 7)

C- 5

Page 59: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private
Page 60: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

APPENDIX TABLE C.2b

SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR DRUG OFFENSES

SERIOUSNESS OFFENDER GUIDELINE SERIOUSNESS OFFENDER GUIDELINE

CATEGORY SCORE RANGE CATEGORY SCORE RANGE

O P 0 6M—3Y1 P 1 1Y—3Y2 P 2 18M—4Y

VII 3 P—1M III 3 3Y—7Y4 P—3M (Except 4 4Y—8Y5 P—6M Importation) 5 5Y—1OY6 3M—6M 6 7Y—14Y7+ 6M—12M 7+ 12Y—20Y

O P—6M 0 1Y—4Y1 P—12M 1 2Y—5Y2 3M—12M 2 3Y—6Y

V 3 6M—18M III 3 4Y—7Y4 1Y—2Y (Importation) 4 5Y—8Y5 1.5Y—2.5Y 5 6Y—1OY6 2Y—3Y 6 8Y—15Y7+ 3Y—4Y 7+ 15Y—25Y

o P—12M1 P—18M2 6M—18M

IV 3 1Y—2Y4 1.5Y—2.5Y5 2Y-3Y6 3Y-4Y7+ 3.5Y—5Y

(Rev. 7/87)C- 7

Page 61: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

c-s

Page 62: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

APPENDIX TABLE 3C. a

SENTENCING MATRIX FOR PROPERTY OFFENSES

OFFENDER SCORE

OFFENSESERIOUSNESS 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

7 or

CATEGORYmore

VII P-1M P-3M 3M—9M 6M-1Y .9M-18M 11-21 11-31 31-51

VI P-3M P-6M 3M-il 6M-21 1Y-31 21-51 31-61 51-101

V P-6M P-il 3M-21 11-31 18M-51 31-71 41-81 81-151

Iv P-il 3M-21 6M-31 11-41 18M-71 31-81 51-121 101-201

III P-21 6M-31 9M-51 11-51 21-81 31-101 71-151 151-301

II 21-51 31-71 51-81 51-101 8Y-15Y 101-181 121-201 151-401

P=Probation M=Months l=lears

(Rev. 3/87) C—9

Page 63: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

C

C

C

Page 64: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

APPENDIX TABLE C.3b

SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR PROPERTY OFFENSES

SERIOUSNESS OFFENDER GUIDELINE SERIOUSNESS OFFENDER GUIDELINECATEGORY SCORE RANGE CATEGORY SCORE RANGE

O P—1M 0 P—2Y1 P—3M 1 6M—3Y

VII 2 3M—9M III 2 9M—5Y3 6M—1Y 3 1Y—5Y4 9M—18M 4 2Y—8Y5 1Y—2Y 5 3Y—1OY6 1Y—3Y 6 7Y—15Y7+ 3Y—5Y 7 15Y—3OY

O P—3M 0 2Y—5Y1 P—6M 1 3Y—7Y2 3M—1Y 2 5Y—8Y3 6M—2Y 3 5Y—IOY

VI 4 1Y—3Y II 4 8Y—15Y5 2Y—5Y 5 1OY—18Y6 3Y—6Y 6 12Y-2OY7+ 5Y—1OY 7 15Y—4OY

O P—6M1 P—1Y2 3M-2Y

V 3 1Y—3Y4 18M—5Y5 3Y—7Y6 4Y-8Y7+ 8Y-15Y

O P—1Y1 3M-2Y2 6M—3Y

IV 3 1Y-4Y4 18M—7Y5 3Y-8Y6 5Y—12Y7+ 1OY—20Y

(Rev. 3/87)

c-il

Page 65: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

APPENDIX D

JURISDICTION CODES

CODE JURISDICTION01 Allegany County

02 Anne Arundel County

24 Baltimore City

03 Baltimore County

04 Calvert County

05 Caroline County

06 Carroll County

07 Cecil County

08 Charles County

09 Dorchester County

10 Frederick County

11 Garrett County

12 Harford County

13 Howard County

14 Kent County

15 Montgomery County

16 Prince George’s County

17 Queen Anne’s County

18 St. Mary’s County

19 Somerset County

20 Talbot County

21 Washington County

22 Wicomico County

23 Worcester County

(Rev. 3/87)

D- 1

Page 66: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

APPENDIX E

SAMPLE CASES

CaseNo. Page

1 Offense Against a Person —

Single Convicted Offense E—3

2 Drug Offense —

Single Convicted Offense E—7

3 Property Offense —

Single Convicted Offense E—1O

4 Multiple Offenses —

Single Criminal Event E—14

5 Offenses Against a Person -

Multiple Offenses from Categories Iand II — Single Criminal Event E—2O

6 Multiple Offenses —

Multiple Criminal Events E—29

7 Multiple Offenses from Single andMultiple Criminal Events E—35

8 Mandatory Minimum Sentence E—43

(Rev. 3/87)

E— 1

Page 67: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

C

C

C

Page 68: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 1

OFFENSE AGAINST A PERSON — SINGLE CONVICTED OFFENSE

OFFENDER’S NAME: P B_____DATE OF BIRTH: 02/25/66SEX: MaleRACE: WhiteDATE OF OFFENSE: 09/27/86

OFFENSE DESCRIPTION:

DOCKET NO: 00000001DATE OF PLEA/VERDICT: 01/08/87DISPOSITION TYPE: Plea Agree

ment /Non—Binding Re commendation of State’s Attorney

JURISDICTION: Montgomery CountyCONVICTED COUNT: Robbery with a

Deadly Weapon 27/488

On 09/27/86, police were summoned to a convenience store for areport of an armed robbery. The cashier reported that two white maleshad entered the store and that one of the men was armed with a sawed—off shotgun. The cashier and a clerk were instructed to lie on thefloor as one of the men removed money from the cash register. Thesubjects fled in a car and, based on a witness’s description of thevehicle, were apprehended by another unit a short time later. Thedefendant was identified by the cashier as the man with the shotgun.Defendant pled guilty to Robbery with a Deadly Weapon on 01/08/87.

OFFENDER’S PRIOR RECORD:

JUVENILE: No juvenile record was found for the name and birthdateprovided.

ADULT:

Offense Disposition

08/01/84 Possession of Marijuana Fine $100.00; Court Costs.06/10/85 Unemployment Insurance 6 months suspended; 2

Fraud years probation;restitution.

The offender was still under supervision at the time ofthe instant offense.

Date

(Rev. 3/87)

3

Page 69: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 1 (Continued)

CCOMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORES

ROBBERY WITH A DEADLY WEAPON 27/488

OFFENSE SCORE:

A. Seriousness Category of Instant Offense

As shown in Appendix A, Robbery with aDeadly Weapon is a Category III Offense. 5 points

B. Victim Injury

No injury 0 points

C. Weapon Usage

A firearm (sawed—off shotgun) was used. 2 points

D. Special Vulnerability of Victim

Victim over 10 and under 60 years oldand not mentally nor physically handicapped 0 points c

TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE 7 points

OFFENDER SCORE:

A. Relationship to CJS When Instant OffenseOccurred

Was on probation for Unemployment CompensationFraud. 1 point

B. Juvenile Delinquency

No record found. 0 points

C. Prior Adult Criminal Record

Step I — Possession of Marijuana — SeriousnessCategory VIIUnemployment Insurance Fraud — SeriousnessCategory VII

C(Rev. 3/87)

E’- 4

Page 70: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 1 (Continued)

The number of prior convictions according to

Seriousness Category are:

SERIOUSNESS NUMBER OF PRIORCATEGORY CONVICTIONS

I 0II 0III 0IV 0V 0VI 0VII 2

Step II — Since the offender’s most serious priorconvictions were in Category VII, referto the block in Appendix Table B.1which indicates two Seriousness CategoryVII convictions. This block identifiesthe record as “Minor”.

Step III — An offender with a minor recordreceives 1 point 1 point

D. Prior Adult Parole/Probation Violations

None. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENDER SCORE 2 points

GUIDELINES RANGES:

An examination of Appendix Table C.la or C.lb shows that therecommended range for an offense score of 7 and an offender score of 2is 5Y—1OY.

(Rev. 3/87)

E- 5

Page 71: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

B.

Juven

ile

Del

inqu

ency

Not

Mor

eT

han

One

Fin

ding

ofD

elin

quen

cyor

over

age

251

=T

wo

orM

ore

Fin

din

gs,

No

orO

neC

om

mit

men

t2

=T

wo

orM

ore

Cofl

jjfl

jtm

enC

.P

rior

Adu

ltC

rim

inal

Rec

ord

0=

Non

e

Min

or

3=

Mod

erat

e

5=

Maj

or

D.

Pri

orA

dult

Paro

IeiP

rob

atl

iiV

iola

tion

sN

o1

=Y

es

DIS

PO

SIT

ION

TY

PE

DTA

—_

CO

N—

PR

O__R

AN

Fl RES

T

cS.—

——

—-—

.01 02

—.-__

——

USE

TO

TA

LN

__

TF1 RE

ST

TCS

——

——

TR

AN

CE

TO

UT

1_

——

TO

UT

2—

JUS

E

rn

71n7

s

PSI

DA

TEO

FO

FFE

NSE

DA

TEO

FSE

NT

EN

CIN

G

2No

tI

01.9

1217

816

II

MA

RY

LAN

DSE

NT

EN

CIN

GI0

FFEN

DER

NA

ME

Las

t,Fi

rst

Mid

dle)

MI.

F.m

al.

‘Bla

ckW

hit.

HIs

panI

cO

th.r

BIR

IND

AT

EIJ

UR

ISD

ICT

ION

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

WO

RK

SHEE

TB

P.

2i

[012

J25

16

I15

CO

NV

ICT

ED

CR

IMIN

Al.

AT

TH

ISS

EN

TE

NC

ING

OF

FE

NS

ES

EV

EN

TS

IW

OR

KSH

EE

TS

—7

or

NU

MB

ER

OF

:IO

i1

IIo

•1

ICR

1MIN

AL

EV

EN

TS

1

Ii

‘ie

aag

reem

ent•

stat

enat

ure

of

no

n-b

ind

ina

reco

mm

enda

tion

of’

Sta

tei.

a

att

orn

ez

1’

OF

FE

NS

ES

CO

RV

ibff

ense

Aaa

lnst

aP

erso

nO

nly)

S

2P

lea,

noag

reem

ent

3C

ourt

tria

l

4Ju

rytr

ial

CO

NV

ICT

ED

OF

FE

NS

ETI

TLE

-A

OC

CO

DE

MD

.C

OD

E.

AR

T.

1SE

CT

ION

STA

T.

MA

X.

DO

CK

ET

NU

MB

ER

1 St

RDW

I2

7/4

38

201

00000001

2nd

3rd

AD

CU

SEO

NL

Y.

DO

NO

TW

RIT

EIN

SP

AC

EB

EL

OW

INC

SU

S_

A.

Ser

Ious

ness

Cat

egor

y1s

tO

ff2n

dO

ff3r

dO

f

0101

01=

VV

ll

0303

03=

IV

c05

05=

III

0808

08=

II

1010

10=

QfJ

DE

RS

CO

RE

_______

A.

Rel

atio

nsh

ipto

CJS

Whe

nIn

stant

Co

un

tO

ccurr

ed

0=

No

ne

orP

endi

ngC

ases

Cou

rtor

Oth

erC

rim

inal

Ju

sti

ce

Su

nerv

isio

n

AC

TU

AL

SEN

TE

NC

EG

UID

ELIN

ESR

AN

GE

1st

Oll

en

s.

TO

101

B.V

ictim

Inju

ry

1st

ConvIc

ted

Off

ense

00

=N

oln

jury

11

1=

No

Inju

ry,

Non

-Per

man

ent

22

2=

Per

man

ent

lnlu

rvor

Dea

th

Impo

sed,

susp

ende

dpr

obat

ion,

Subs

eque

ntlin

e,re

stitu

tion,

com

mun

ityse

rvic

eOl

lende

r

1Y

es

2:o

C.

Wea

pon

Usa

g.0

00

=N

oW

eapon

11

1=

Wea

pon

Oth

erT

han

Fir

earm

‘52

2=

Fir

earm

orE

xplo

sive

00

2nd

Olf

ense TO

3rd

Off

ense

TO

OV

ERA

LLG

UID

ELIN

ESR

AN

GE

(For

Mul

tipl

eC

ou

nts

Onl

y)

_____

TO

0.S

peci

alV

ulne

rabi

lity

ofV

ictim

=N

o

=Y

es

IiLL?

-.II_L

_.JI_i

_IO

FFE

NSE

SCO

RE

CS)

2nd

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

se[s

2N

o

Sus

ACT

CO

N_

PR

O_

....

Fl RES

T

AC

T_

........_

CO

N_

PR

O_

_

Fl RE

ST—

rs3r

dC

on

vic

ted

Off

ense

RE

AS

ON

IFA

CT

UA

LS

EN

TE

NC

ED

EP

AR

TS

FR

OM

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

RA

NG

E

I.QJJ

OFF

EN

DE

RSC

OR

E

lYes

2N

o

INS

TIT

UT

ION

AL

IPA

RO

LE

RE

CO

MM

EN

DA

TIO

NIA

DD

ITIO

NA

LIN

FO

.

EV

EN

TS

——

TL

RA

NG

E—

TU

RA

NG

E—

TO

TA

LI

TO

TA

LS

___..

._

SEN

TE

NC

ING

JUD

GE

SIG

NA

TU

RE

J

__

D

__

_

WO

RK

SHE

ET

CO

MPL

ET

ED

BY

TIT

LE

CO

PIE

S:W

hite

-Jud

ge,

Blu

e-A

OC

;G

reen

-A(t

ach

tcrn

itmen

tor

Prob

atio

nO

rder

;Y

ello

w-F

ile;

Pink

-Pro

secu

tion;

Gol

d-D

efen

se

Page 72: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 2

DRUG OFFENSE — SINGLE CONVICTED OFFENSE

OFFENDER’S NAME: R C____DATE OF BIRTH: 11/10/58SEX: FemaleRACE: WhiteDATE OF OFFENSE: 03/07/86

OFFENSE DESCRIPTION:

DOCKET NO: 00000002DATE OF PLEA/VERDICT: 06/30/86DISPOSITION TYPE: Charge BargainJURISDICTION: Montgomery CountyCONVICTED COUNT: Possession with

Intent to Distribute Marijuana27/286(b) (3)

On 03/07/86, police serving a search warrant at defendant’s home

found one plastic bag of marijuana, a glass jar of marijuana seeds and

a scale in the living room; six bags of marijuana in the master

bedroom; and a green can, labelled “one oz. of grass,” which contained

marijuana seeds in another bedroom. The subject was arrested and

eventually charged with Possession with Intent to Distribute Marijuana

and simple Possession. On 06/30/86, the defendant pled guilty to one

count of Possession with Intent to Distribute.

OFFENDER’S PRIOR RECORD:

JUVENILE: None known.

ADULT:

OFFENSE SCORE:

None known

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORESPOSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE

MARIJUANA 27/286(b) (3)

(Rev. 3/87)

There is no offense score for drug offenses.

OFFENDER SCORE:

A. Relationship to CJS when Instant Offense Occurred

None.

B. Juvenile Delinquency

Defendant was over 26 years of age when theinstant offense was committed.

0 points

0 points

E- 7

Page 73: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 2 (Continued)

C. Prior Adult Criminal Record

No record found. 0 points

D. Prior Adult Parole/Probation Violations

None. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE 0 points

OFFENDER SCORE:

An examination of Appendix Table C.2a or C.2b shows that theguideline sentence for Possession with intent to Distribute Marijuana(Seriousness Category IV) by a person with an offender score of 0 is P—1 2M.

C

C(Rev. 3/87)

E- 8

Page 74: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

PSI

bAT

EO

FO

FFEN

SEID

ATE

OF

SEN

TEN

CIN

G

,)V

en

2N

o

I0

7j 8

61.

AT

TH

IS““‘

SEN

TE

NC

ING

OFF

EN

SES

IC

ON

VIC

TE

flO

FF

EN

SE

TIT

LE

1st P

oss

ess

ion

w/’

ito

Di,

stri

bu

teM

ar-i

-uan

a

0101

01=

V-V

u

0303

03=

IV

0505

05=

Ill

0808

08=

II

1010

10=

IB

.V

icti

mIn

jury

00

0=

Noin

jury

11

1=

No

Inju

ry,

Non

-Per

man

ent

22

2=

Pe”t

Inlu

rvor

Osa

thC

.W

eapo

nU

sage

00

0=

NoW

eapon

11

1=

Wea

pon

Oth

erT

han

Fir

earm

22

2=

Fir

earm

orE

xplo

sive

A.

Rel

atio

nsh

ipto

CJS

Wh

enIn

stan

tC

ount

Occ

urr

ed

Non

eor

Pen

ding

Cas

es

1=

Cou

rtor

Oth

erC

rim

inal

Just

ice

Sun

ervi

sion

B.

Juve

nile

Del

inqu

ency

Not

Mor

eT

han

One

Fin

ding

olD

elin

quen

cyor

over

age

25=

Tw

oor

Mor

eF

indi

ngs,

No

orO

neC

om

mit

men

t2

=T

wo

orM

ore

Co

mjm

tru

enC

Pri

orA

dult

Cri

min

alR

ecor

d

(9=

Non

e

1=

Min

or

3=

Mod

erat

e

5=

Maj

or

D.

Pri

orA

dult

Paro

IeIP

rob

ati

WV

iola

tion

sN

o1

=Y

es

A_

__

___

R_____

WO

kK

ShE

tC

OM

PLET

EDBY

TO

TA

LN

____

TF1 RE

ST

TC

S—

——

TR

AN

GE

TO

UT

1—

.—

CR

CR

IMIN

AL

EV

EN

TS

WO

RK

SHE

ET

SO

F

Ioil

CR

IMIN

AL

EV

EN

TII

1

DIS

PO

SIT

ION

TY

PE

lea

agre

em

ent

-sta

tenatu

reo

f2

Ple

a,no

agre

emen

t

ple

ato

hig

hest

of

two

charg

es

3C

ou

rttr

ial

4Ju

rytr

ial

1st

Off

2nd

Off

3rd

Off

AO

CC

OD

EM

D.

CO

DE.

AR

T,&

SEC

TIO

NST

AT.

MA

X.

DO

CK

ET

NU

MB

ER

OF

FE

NS

ES

CO

RE

(bff

rise

Aain

sta

Per

son

Onl

y)-

Off

ND

ER

SC

OR

E

27

/28

6(b

)(3

)51

A.S

erl

ou

sn.n

Cat

egor

y

2nd

3rd

ji

‘z2’

111111,0

15

.-

I15

AD

CU

SEO

Na,

Y.

DO

NO

IW

RIT

EIN

SP

AC

EB

EL

OW

SU

S—

AC

T______

STA

—_

CO

N—

PR

O__R

AN

Fl RE

ST

cS

——

--.—

---.

02—.

——

USE

ci

Ic

00

00

00

02

GU

IDEL

INES

AC

TU

AL

SE

NT

EN

CE

Impo

sed,

susp

ende

d,pr

obat

ion,

Subs

eque

nt

RA

NG

Eti

ne.

rest

ilut

ion,

com

mun

ityse

rvic

eO

ltenc

ier

1st

Co

nv

Icte

dO

ffen

seY

es2

ro1s

tO

ffen

se

TO

12M

2nd

Off

ense T

o

3rd

Off

ense

__

__

__

TO

OV

ERA

LLG

UID

ELIN

ESR

AN

GE

(For

Mult

iple

Counts

Onl

y)

_____

TO

00

0

I1

__

_1

D.

Spe

cial

Vul

nera

bili

tyof

Vic

tIm

=N

o

=Y

es

__

__

_____________

____

OFF

EN

SESC

OR

E(S

)

AC

T

C0

N_

PR

O_

_

Fl RE

ST

2ndC

onvic

tedO

ften

se2N

oS

US

____._

..

AC

T___

——

CO

N_

PR

O_

_

FI_____

RE

ST—

3rd

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

seIi

Yes

2-—

CS

——

EV

EN

TS

——

TL

RA

NG

E—

TU

RA

NG

E—

TO

TA

IJ

RE

AS

ON

IFA

CT

UA

LS

EN

TE

NC

ED

EP

AR

TS

FR

OM

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

RA

NG

E

[rL-Q

]OF

FE

ND

ER

SCO

RE

INS

TIT

UT

ION

AL

IPA

RO

LE

RE

CO

MM

EN

DA

TIO

NIA

DD

ITIO

NA

LIN

FO

.

SEN

TE

NC

ING

JUD

GE

SIG

NA

TU

RE

P.A

. TIT

LE

TO

iJT

2—

IUS

E

CO

PIES

:W

hite

-Jud

ge;

Blu

e-A

OC

;G

reen

-Atta

chto

Com

mitm

ent

orPr

obat

ion

Ord

er;

Yel

low

-File

;Pi

nk-P

rose

cutio

n;G

old-

Def

ense

(Rev

.71

87)

Page 75: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 3

PROPERTY OFFENSE — SINGLE CONVICTED OFFENSE

OFFENDER’S NAME: A C_____ DOCKET NO: 00000003

DATE OF BIRTH: 12/27/66 DATE OF PLEA/VERDICT: 08/13/86

SEX: Male DISPOSITION TYPE: Plea/Agreed

RACE: Black Statement of FactsDATE OF OFFENSE: 01/17/86 JURISDICTION: Montgomery County

CONVICTED COUNT: Theft $300.00or more 27/342(f)(1)

OFFENSE DESCRIPTION:

On 01/17/86, defendant was observed by a security officer in a

department of a large suburban store removing seven blazers, three

pairs of pants, seven skirts, and one shirt (total value — $1,153.89).

After placing the merchandise in four bags, defendant left the

department, passed many cash registers without paying, went down the

escalator, and was arrested as he paused to buy shopping bags. On

08/13/86, the defendant pled guilty to one count of Theft $300.00 or

more.

OFFENDER’S PRIOR RECORD:

JUVENILE:

Date Offense Disposition

06/26/80 Shoplifting Delinquent; 1 yearprobation

12/11/80 Larceny Delinquent; probationcontinued

06/10/81 Unauthorized Use Delinquent; GreenridgeForestry Camp for 6months

ADULT:

Date Offense Disposition

02/06/85 Petty Larceny — UnknownViolation of BailReform Act

04/09/85 Theft 2 years probation.(D. C.)

Since 08/13/86, the subject has been in the PrinceGeorge’s County Detention Center. He is still on probationin the District of Columbia where in June, 1986 his probatio

(Rev. 3/87)

E.- 10

Page 76: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 3 (Continued)

officer took him to court for a show—cause hearing because ofhis unsatisfactory adjustment.

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORESTHEFT $300.00 OR MORE 27/342(f)(1)

OFFENSE SCORE:

There is no offense score for property offenses.

OFFENDER SCORE:

A. Relationship to CJS When Instant Offense Occurred

On probation for Theft. 1 point

B. Juvenile Delinquency

Three findings of delinquency with onecommitment. 1 point

C. Prior Adult Criminal Record

Step I — Theft — Seriousness Category VII

The number of prior convictions according toSeriousness Category are:

SERIOUSNESS NUMBER OF PRIORCATEGORY CONVICTIONS

I 0II 0III 0IV 0V 0VI 0VII 1

NOTE: In this case, the prior Theft must be assumedto be under $300.00 since the amount is notknown. The Petty Larceny (02/06/85) was notcounted since the disposition is unknown.

(Rev. 3/87)

E- 11

Page 77: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 3 (Continued)

CStep II — Since the most serious prior

conviction was in SeriousnessCategory VII, refer to the blockin Appendix Table B.1 whichindicates one SeriousnessCategory VII conviction. Thisblock identifies the record astMinorH

Step III — An offender with a minor recordreceives 1 point. 1 point

D. Prior Adult Parole/Probation Violations

No adult violations prior to instant offense 0 points

TOTAL OFFENDER SCORE 3 points

GUIDELINES RANGE:

An examination of Appendix Table C.3a or C.3b shows that theguideline sentence range for Theft $300.00 or more (SeriousnessCategory V) committed by a person with an offender score of 3 is 1Y—3Y.

C(Rev. 3/87)

E’- 12

Page 78: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

CR

IMIN

AL

EV

EN

TS

A.

Rel

atio

nsh

ipto

CJS

Whe

nIn

stan

tC

ount

Occ

urr

ed

o=

Non

eor

Pen

ding

Cas

es

=C

ourt

orO

ther

Cri

min

alJu

stic

eS

uper

visi

onB

.Ju

ven

ile

Del

inqu

ency

o=

Not

Mor

eT

hare

One

Fin

ding

ofD

elin

quen

cyor

over

age

25T

wo

orM

ore

Fin

ding

s,N

oor

One

Com

mit

men

t2

=T

wo

orM

ore

Com

injt

njer

ijC

.P

rior

Adu

ltC

rim

inal

Rec

ord

o=

Non

e

Min

or

3=

Mod

erat

e

5=

Maj

or

0.

PrI

orA

dult

Paro

IeIP

robatI

’t

Vio

lati

ons

No

1=

Yes

OV

ER

AL

LG

UID

EL

INE

SR

AN

GE

(For

Mul

tipl

eC

ou

nts

Onl

y)

TO

lVIM

lIL

.Mfl

L1

IlL

,lI’

1L

-

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

wO

RK

SHE

ET

CPS

Iji

iAii

OF

OFF

ENSE

IDA

TEOF

SEN

TEN

CIN

G

gY

es

2N

oI 0

11I

17

1816

CO

NV

ICT

ED

AT

TH

ISS

EN

TE

NC

ING

OF

FE

NS

ES

NU

MB

ER

OF

:

(01

A

Ii

WO

RK

SHE

ET

$IO

F

101

CR

IMIN

AL

EV

EN

TI.

1

DIS

POSI

TIO

NTY

PEP

lea

agre

emen

t.st

ate

nat

ure

of

Aq

reed

state

men

to

ffa

ct

Mal

eF

emal

eB

lack

Whi

t.H

ispa

nIc

Oth

er

1(j)

22

34

[1I

j27

6I

j

2P

lea,

noag

reem

ent

3C

ourt

tria

l

4Ju

rytr

Ial

CO

NV

ICTE

DO

FFE

NSE

TITL

EA

OC

CO

DE

MD

.C

OD

E.

AR

T.

1SE

CT

ION

STA

T.

MA

X.

DO

CK

ETN

UM

BER

1StT

heft

$300

or

mor

e27/3

42(f

)(1)

151

00

00

00

03

2nd

3rd

OF

FE

NS

ES

CO

RE

bft

ée

Aga

inst

aP

erso

nO

nly)

-2f.

Ef4

DE

RS

CO

RE

istO

ff

01 03 05 08 In

2nd

Off

01 03 05 08 In

3rd

Off

01 03 05 08 in

A. S

erio

usne

ssC

ateg

ory

=V

-Vll

=IV

=ill

AD

OU

SEO

NL

Y.

DO

NO

TW

RIT

EIN

SP

AC

EB

EL

OW

IN

C__

——

sus

ST

A__C

ON

PR

O_._

RA

N

Fl RES

T—

Cs

——

01—

02—

USE

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

AC

TU

AL

SE

NT

EN

CE

RA

NG

Ele

tO

ffen

se

TO

31

B.V

ictim

Inju

ry0

00

=N

oln

iury

11

1=

No

Inju

ry,

Non

-Per

man

ent

22

9=

pn

rmn

nn

tIn

I..r

yor

Dea

th

1st

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

se

Impo

sed,

susp

ende

d,pr

obat

ion,

Subs

eque

nttin

e,re

stitu

tion,

com

mun

ilyse

rvic

eOf

fend

er

lYes

2l’

o

C.

Wea

pon

Usa

ge0

00

=N

oW

eapon

11

1=

Wea

pon

Oth

erT

han

Fir

earm

22

2=

Fir

earm

orE

xplo

sive

2nd

Ofi

ense

TO

3rd

Oli

ense

__

__

__

TO

00

0=

No

11

D.

Spe

cial

Vul

nera

bili

tyof

Vic

tim

SUS

ACT

CO

N_

PR

O__

Fl RE

ST

CS

——

.---

——

-.—

=Y

es

__

__

_____________

____

OFF

EN

SESC

OR

E(S

)

2nd

ConvIc

ted

Off

ense

2N

o

3rd

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

se

RE

AS

ON

IFA

CT

UA

LS

EN

TE

NC

ED

EP

AR

TS

FRO

MG

UID

EL

INE

SR

AN

GE

OFF

EN

DE

RSC

OR

E

sus

CO

N_,

...,.

PR

O__

Fl RE

ST

CS

lYes

2N

o

INS

TIT

UT

ION

AL

IPA

RO

LE

RE

CO

MM

EN

DA

TIO

NIA

DD

ITIO

NA

LIN

FO

.

SEN

TE

NC

ING

JUD

GE

SIG

NA

TU

RE

EV

EN

TS

——

TL

RA

NG

E—

——

TU

RA

NG

E—

——

TO

TA

LI

TO

TA

LS

_..

__

TO

TA

LN

_...

TF1 RE

ST

TC

S—

——

TR

AN

CE

TOU

T1—

.___

TOIJ

T2—

—-—

1USE

WU

CK

SIIE

ET

CO

MPL

ET

ED

ey

N________

_D

__

__

__

__

P.’

A.

TIT

LE

COPI

ES:

Whi

te-J

udge

;SI

ue-A

OC

;G

reen

-Atta

chto

Com

mitm

ent

orPr

obat

ion

Ord

er;

Yel

low

-File

;Pi

nk-P

rose

cutio

n;G

old-

Def

ense

(Rev

.71

8T)

Page 79: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 4

MULTIPLE COUNTS — SINGLE CRIMINAL EVENT

OFFENDER’S NAME: J B_____DATE OF BIRTH: 01/26/65SEX: MaleRACE: BlackDATE OF OFFENSES: 12/03/85

OFFENSE DESCRIPTION

DOCKET NO: 00000004DATE OF PLEA/VERDICT: 06/18/86DISPOSITION TYPE: Jury TrialJURISDICTION: Baltimore CityCONVICTED COUNTS: Robbery with a

Deadly Weapon 27/488Use of a Handgun in the Commissionof Crime 27/36B(d)Possession of Marijuana 27/287

On 12/03/85, the victim and a friend had left a restaurant and

were walking toward their car when they were approached by a lone,

black male. The defendant grabbed the victim and pushed him against a

car. After producing a small handgun, he demanded and received the

victim’s wallet. The defendant then fled on foot. A few minutes

later, the victim’s friend observed a passing patrol car and yelled for

help. During a search of the surrounding area, the victim identified a

man walking across a vacant lot as his assailant. As the patrol car

approached, the defendant threw an object and began to run. The

defendant was apprehended by another police unit circling the area, at

which time a small glassine bag containing marijuana was found on his

person. A search for the thrown object produced a 25 caliber automatic

pistol. The victim was subsequently transported to a nearby hospital

where he received treatment for a sprained wrist. On 06/18/82, a jury

found the defendant guilty of Robbery with a Deadly Weapon, Use of aHandgun in the Commission of a Felony, and Possession of Marijuana.

OFFENDER’S PRIOR RECORD:

JUVENILE:

Disposition

Delinquent, 18 monthsprobation.

Delinquent;continued.

Date Offense Disposition

10/05/83 Theft under $300.00 18 months suspended; 3years probation.

(Rev. 3/87)

C

Date Offense

10/03/81 Malicious Destruction

11/20/82 Assault

ADULT:

probation

E- 14

Page 80: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SANPLE CASE 4 (Continued)

Offender was placed on three years adult probation in1983 for Theft under $300.00 and was under supervision at thetime he coimnitted the instant offense.

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORESROBBERY WITH A DEADLY WEAPON 27/488

OFFENSE SCORE:

A. Seriousness Category of Instant Offense

As shown in Appendix A, Robbery with aDeadly Weapon is a Category III Offense. 5 points

B. Victim Injury

Victim suffered a sprained wrist. 1 points

C. Weapon Usage

A handgun was used. 2 points

D. Special Vulnerability of Victim

Victim over 10 and under 60 years oldand not mentally nor physically handicapped 0 points

TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE 8 points

OFFENDER SCORE:

A. Relationship to CJS When Instant Offense Occurred

Offender was on probation for Theft under$300.00 at the time he committed theinstant offenses. 1 point

B. Juvenile Delinquency

Offender has been found delinquent twice, oncefor Malicious Destruction and once for Assault. 1 point

C. Prior Adult Criminal Record

Step I — Theft under $300.00 — SeriousnessCategory VII

(Rev. 3/87)

E- 15

Page 81: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 4 (Continued)

The number of prior convictions according toSeriousness Category are:

SERIOUSNESS NUMBER OF PRIORCATEGORY CONVICTIONS

I 0II 0III 0IV 0V 0VI 0VII 1

Step II — Since the offender’s only adult conviction was in Seriousness CategoryVII, refer to the block in AppendixTable 3.1 which indicates oneSeriousness Category VII conviction.This block identifies the record as“Minor”.

Step III — An offender with a minor recordreceives 1 point 1 point

D. Prior Adult Parole/Probation Violations

None. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENDER SCORE 3 points

GUIDELINES RANGE FOR THE ROBBERY WITH A DEADLY WEAPON

An examination of Appendix Table C.la or C.lb shows therecommended range for an offense score of 8 and an offender score of 3is 7Y—13Y.

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORESUSE OF HANDGUN IN COMMISSION OF A FELONY

OFFENSE SCORE:

Since this offense is the same seriousness category as the Robberywith a Deadly Weapon and was part of the same criminal event, theoffense score is the same, 8.

(Rev. 3/87)E’- 16

Page 82: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 4 (Continued)

OFFENDER SCORE:

The offender score is also the same as for the Robbery with aDeadly Weapon, 3.

GUIDELINES RANGE FOR USE OF A HANDGUN IN THE COMMISSION OF A FELONY

Since the offense and offender scores are 8 and 3 respectively,the recommended guideline range for the handgun conviction is 7Y—13Y.

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORESPOSSESSION OF MARIJUANA 27/286

OFFENSE SCORE:

There is no offense score for drug offenses.

OFFENDER SCORE:

The offender score is 3, the same as in the Robbery with a DeadlyWeapon and Use of a Handgun in the Commission of A Felony.

TOTAL OFFENDER SCORE 3 points

GUIDELINES RANGE FOR THE POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA

An examination of Appendix Table C.2a or C.2b shows therecommended range for an offender score of 3 is P—1M.

OVERALL GUIDELINES RANGE FOR THE SENTENCING EVENT

Following the procedure as defined on Page 16 for determining theguidelines for multiple counts from same criminal event, the overallrecommended range is the highest of the recommended ranges, i.e., 7Y—1 3Y.

(Rev. 3/87)

E’- 17

Page 83: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 4 (Continued)

CCriminal GuidelinesEvent Offense Range

1 Robbery with a Deadly Weapon 7—13 years1 Use of a Handgun in the

Commission of a Felony —3-yeas1 Possession of Marijuana

________

7—13 years

C

C(Rev. 3/87)

E- 18

Page 84: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

A.

Rel

atio

nsh

ipto

CJS

Whe

nin

stan

tC

ount

Occ

urr

ed

o=

Non

eor

Pen

ding

Cas

es

Cou

rtor

Oth

erC

rim

inal

Just

ice

Sup

ervi

sion

B.

Juven

ile

Del

inqu

ency

o=

Not

Mor

eT

han

One

Fin

ding

ofD

elin

quen

cyor

over

age

2513

=T

wo

orM

ore

Fin

ding

s,N

oor

One

Com

mit

men

t2

=T

wo

orM

ore

Com

mjt

ien

C.

Pri

orA

dult

Cri

min

alR

ecor

d

o=

Non

e

Min

or

3=

Mod

erat

e

5=

Maj

or

D.

Pri

orA

dult

Paro

leIP

rob

aIl

EV

iola

tion

=N

o1

=Y

es

DIS

PO

SIT

ION

TY

PE

TO

TA

LN

_....,.__

TF

1

RE

ST

TC

S—

_-.

TR

AN

GE

TO

UT

1—

.___

TO

UT

2—

TU

SE

MM

ITL

Mr1

i)It

INL

iIN

Li

-

GU

ID

EL

IN

ES

WO

RK

SH

EE

TB

DA

TEO

FSE

NT

EN

CIN

G

J

RDW

1.P

lea

agre

emen

t-st

ate

nat

ure

of

Mal

eF

emal

eB

lack

Wh

it.

HIs

pan

icO

th.r

I

id2

10

23

I°112

616

24

AO

CC

OD

EM

D.

CO

DE

.A

RT

.S

SEC

TIO

N

2P

lea,

noag

reem

ent

3C

ourt

tria

l

(3)Ju

rytr

ial

I27/4

88

OF

FE

NS

ES

CO

RE

Ijb

ffn

seA

aln

sta

Per

son

Onl

y)-

Z.

OE

fND

ER

SC

OR

E1s

tO

ff

01 03 08 10

STA

T.

MA

X.

DO

CK

ET

NU

MB

ER

2nd H

andg

unU

sein

Felo

ny

I2,7

/368(d

)201

00

00

00

04

3rd P

oss

ess

ion

of

Mari

juana

27/2

87

11

00

00

00

04

I—

20

10

00

00

00

4

2nd

Off

3rd

OfI

A.

Ser

ious

ness

Cat

egor

y

0101

=V

-VII

0303

=IV

05=

Ill

0808

=II

1010

=

AD

CU

SEO

NL

Y.

DO

NO

TW

RIT

EIN

SP

AC

EB

EL

OW

INC

——

SU

S_

__

__

STA

—_

CO

N—

PR

O__R

AN

Ft RE

ST

CS

_—

——

---—

01—

02—

USE

AC

TUA

LSE

NT

EN

CE

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

RA

NG

E

1st

Oll

ense

TO

131

B.

Vic

tim

Inju

ry

00

0=

Noln

jury

Ct)

1=

No

Inju

ry,

Non

-Per

man

ent

22

2=

Pp””t

lnlu

rvor

Dea

th

1st

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

se

Impo

sed,

susp

ende

d,pr

obat

ion,

line,

rest

itut

ion,

com

mun

ityse

rvic

eS

ubsequent

Off

ender

C.

Wea

pon

Usa

ge

00

0=

NoW

eapon

11

1=

Wea

pon

Oth

erT

han

Fir

earm

()2

=F

Irea

rmor

Exp

losi

ve

lYes

21

o

Q0

SUS

AC

T_

__

__

CO

N_

PR

O__

Ft RE

ST

cS-.

_—

---—

-.—

——

D.

Spe

cial

Vul

nera

bili

tyof

Vic

tim

=N

o

=Y

es

2nd

Ofl

ens.

13

1

3rd

Off

ense

__

__

TO

1M OV

ER

AL

LG

UID

EL

INE

SR

AN

GE

(For

Mul

tipl

eC

ou

nts

Onl

y)

_____

TO

13

1

Q_

L_fJ

_Q

JlJ_

I_I

OFF

EN

SESC

OR

E(S

)

2nd

Con

vict

edO

ffen

se1

Yes

2N

o

3rd

Con

vict

edO

ffen

se

RE

ASO

NIF

AC

TU

AL

SE

NT

EN

CE

DE

PAR

TS

FRO

MG

UID

EL

INE

SR

AN

GE

[j

OF

FE

ND

ER

SCO

RE

SU

S_

__

_—

CO

N_

PR

O_

_

Fl RE

ST—

CS

lYes

2N

o

INS

TIT

UT

ION

AL

IPA

RO

LE

RE

CO

MM

EN

DA

TIO

NIA

DD

IT1O

NA

LIN

FO

.

EV

EN

TS

——

TL

RA

NG

E—

TU

RA

NG

E—

TOTA

LI

TO

TA

LS

_,.

....

__

SEN

TE

NC

ING

JUD

GE

SIG

NA

TU

RE

L_

__

_J____

WO

RK

SHE

ET

CO

MPL

ET

ED

BY

P.

A.

TITL

E

CO

PIES

:W

hite

-Jud

ge;

BIu

e-A

OC

;G

reen

-Att

ach

toC

omm

itm

ent

orP

roba

tion

Ord

er;

Yel

low

-File

;Pi

nts-

Pros

ecut

ion;

Gol

d-D

efen

se(R

ev.

7187

)

Page 85: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 5

OFFENSE AGAINST A PERSON — MULTIPLE OFFENSES FROM CATEGORIES I AND II— SINGLE CRIMINAL EVENT

OFFENDER’S NAME: B D_____DATE OF BIRTH: 10/04/63SEX: MaleRACE: WhiteDATE OF OFFENSES: 11/22/85

OFFENSE DESCRIPTION

DOCKET NO: 00000005DATE OF PLEA/VERDICT: 09/10/86DISPOSITION TYPE: Jury TrialJURISDICTION: Baltimore CityCONVICTED COUNT: First Degree Rape

27/462Assault with Intent to Murder27/12Kidnapping 27/337Use of a Handgun in Commission ofa Felony 27/36B(d)

(Rev. 3/87)

On 11/22/85, the victim was walking to her car on a shoppingcenter parking lot when two men approached in a car. One of the menjumped out of the car, grabbed her and pushed her into the car. Shewas driven to a secluded area where she was raped by both men and shot.After managing to crawl to a road she was noticed by a passing motoristand taken to a nearby hospital. The victim suffered permanent damageto her right kidney. Using her description of the defendant and thelicense number of the car, police were able to arrest the defendant thefollowing day. On 09/10/86, a jury found him guilty of First DegreeRape, Assault with Intent to Murder, Kidnapping and Use of a Handgun inthe Commission of a Felony.

OFFENDER’S PRIOR RECORD:

JUVENILE:

to2

C

Date Offense

07/10/74 Unauthorized Use

08/05/79 Shoplifting

08/26/80 Assault with IntentRob

Disposition

Delinquent; 1 yearprobation

Delinquent; 1 yearprobation

Delinquent; committedBoys Village formonths.

B- 20

Page 86: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 5 (Continued)

ADULT:

Date Offense Disposition

05/20/82 Driving While Intoxicated 6 months03/01/84 Assault 1 year suspended;

1 year probation

The offender had recently completed his probation forthe Assault conviction (03/01/84).

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORESFIRST DEGREE RAPE 27/462

OFFENSE SCORE:

A. Seriousness Category of Instant Offense

As shown in Appendix A, First Degree Rapeis a Category I Offense. 10 points

B. Victim Injury

Permanent injury resulting from gunshotwounds 2 points

C. Weapon Usage

Handgun was used. 2 points

D. Special Vulnerability of Victim

Victim over 10 and under 60 years oldand not mentally nor physicallyhandicapped 0 points

TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE 14 points

OFFENDER SCORE:

NOTE: The offender score will be same for each offense.

(Rev. 3/87)

21

Page 87: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 5 (Continued)

A. Relationship to CJS When Instant Offense Occurred

Defendant was not under any supervisionat the time of the offense 0 points

B. Juvenile Delinquency

Offender had 3 findings and 1 commitment 1 point

C. Prior Adult Criminal Record

Step I — Assault — Category VDriving While Intoxicated — Category VII

The number of prior convictions according to- Seriousness Category are:

SERIOUSNESS NUMBER OF PRIORCATEGORY CONVICTIONS

I 0II 0III 0 CIV 0V 1VI 0VII 1

Step II — Since the offender’s most serious priorconviction was in Seriousness Category

- V, refer to the block in Appendix TableB.1 which indicates one SeriousnessCategory V conviction. This blockidentifies the record as “Minor”.

Step III — An offender with a minor recordreceives 1 point 1 point

D. Prior Adult Parole/Probation Violations

None. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENDER SCORE 2 points

C(Rev. 3/87)

E- 22

Page 88: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 5 (Continued)

GUIDELINES RANGE FOR FIRST DEGREE RAPE

An examination of Appendix Table C.la or C.lb shows that therecommended range for an offense score of 14 and an offender score of 2is 28Y—L.

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORESASSAULT WITH INTENT TO fl3RDER 27/12

OFFENSE SCORE:

A. Seriousness Category of Instant Offense

As shown in Appendix A, Assault with Intentto Murder is a Category III Offense. 5 points

B. Victim Injury

Permanent injury resulting from gunshotwounds. 2 points

C. Weapon Usage

Handgun was used. 2 points

D. Special Vulnerability of Victim

Victim over 10 and, under 60 years oldand not mentally nor physicallyhandicapped. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE 9 points

OFFENDER SCORE:

The offender score is the same for all offenses at this sentencingevent, 2.

GUIDELINES RANGE FOR ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO MURDER

An examination of Appendix Table C.la or C.lb shows that therecommended range for an offense score of 9 and an offender score of 2is 8Y—15Y.

(Rev. 3/87)

23

Page 89: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 5 (Continued)

CCOMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORES

KIDNAPPING, 27/337

OFFENSE SCORE:

A. Seriousness Category of Instant Offense

As shown in Appendix A, Kidnapping is aCategory II Offense. 8 points

B. Victim Injury

Permanent injury resulting from gunshotwound. 2 points

C. Weapon Usage

Handgun was used. 2 points

D. Special Vulnerability of Victim

Victim over 10 and under 60 years old Cand not mentally nor physicallyhandicapped. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE 12 points

OFFENDER SCORE:

The offender score is the same for all offenses at this sentencingevent, 2.

GUIDELINES RANGE FOR KIDNAPPING

An examination of Appendix Table C.la or C.lb shows that therecommended range for an offense score of 12 and an offender score of 2is 18Y—30Y.

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCOREUSE OF HANDGUN IN COMMISSION OF A FELONY, 27/36B(d)

NOTE: Because this is the fourth convicted offense, a separateworksheet must be used even though all offenses are fromone criminal event.

(Rev. 3/87)

E’- 24

Page 90: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 5 (Continued)

OFFENSE SCORE:

A. Seriousness Category of Instant Offense

As shown in Appendix A, Handgun Used in theCommission of a Felony is a Category IIIOffense. 5 points

B. Victim Injury

Permanent injury resulting from gunshotwounds. 2 points

C. Weapon Usage

Handgun was used. 2 points

D. Special Vulnerability of Victim

Victim over 10 and under 60 years oldand not mentally nor physicallyhandicapped. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE 9 points

OFFENDER SCORE:

The offender score is the same for all offenses at this sentencingevent,- 2.

GUIDELINES RANGE FOR HANDGUN VIOLATION

An examination of Appendix Table C.la or C.lb shows that therecommended range for an offense score of 9 and an offender score of 2is 8Y—15Y.

OVERALL GUIDELINES RANGE FOR THE SENTENCING EVENT

Because two of the offenses in this criminal event were in eitherSeriousness Category I (First Degree Rape) or Seriousness Category II(Kidnapping), the overall recommended guideline range is determined byadding together the respective lower, and upper limits of the ranges ofeach Category I or II conviction. Following this procedure, theoverall recommended sentencing range would be 46 years (28 years plus18 years) to Life plus 30 years (Life plus 30 years).

(Rev. 3/87)

25

Page 91: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 5 (Continued) cGuideline

Offense Range

Rape 28Y-LifeAWl Murder 8Y—15YKidnapping 18Y-30YUse of Handgun 8Y—15Y

46Y—Life plus 30Y

C

C(Rev. 3/87)

E- 26

Page 92: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

rirs

i,M

IaaIe

)

00

11

6)

6)

3rd

Off

A.

Ser

ious

ness

Cat

egor

y

01=

V-V

u

B.V

ictim

Inju

ry

0=

No

Inju

ry

1=

No

Inju

ry,

Non

-Per

man

ent

tc)

=-4

Inii

irv

or

Dea

th

Qff

JDE

RSC

OR

E

__

__

__

_

A.

Rel

atio

nshi

pto

CJS

Whe

nin

stan

tC

ount

Occ

urre

dN

one

orP

endi

ngC

ases

1=

Cou

rtor

Oth

erC

rim

inal

Just

ice

Sup

ervi

sion

B.

Juve

nile

Del

inqu

ency

0=

Not

Mor

eT

han

One

Fin

ding

ofD

elin

quen

cyor

ov

erag

e25

1=

Tw

oor

More

Fin

din

gs,

No

or

On

eC

om

mit

men

t2

=T

wo

or

Mor

eC

om

njt

iuen

,C

.Pr

ior

Adu

ltC

rim

inal

Rec

ord

0=

No

ne

Min

or

3=

Mo

der

ate

5=

Maj

or

D.

Prio

rA

dult

Paro

IeIP

robatI

E’

Vio

lati

ons

ô=

No

1=

Yes

DIS

POSI

TIO

NTY

PE

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

AC

TU

AL

SE

NT

EN

CE

RA

NG

E

__________________

ido..

1st

Co

nv

Icte

dO

ffen

se

TO

Lif

e

2nd

Of t

ense

151

3rd

Off

ense

181

TO

301

OV

ERA

LLG

UID

EL

INE

SR

AN

GE

(Fo

rM

ult

iple

Co

un

tsO

nly)

46

1T

O

AD

CU

SEO

NLY

.D

ON

OT

WR

ITE

INSP

AC

EB

ELO

W

INC

——

SUS

AC

T_____

DTA

—C

ON

PR

O__R

AN

Fl RE

ST—

CS

—-—

—-—

02—

USE

Fl RE

ST

cS

——

.——

——

--.

Sus

AC

T—

CO

N_

PR

O.._

Fl RE

ST—

cS__

__.

——

TO

TA

LN

_..

TF1

RE

ST—

TC

S—

TR

AN

CE

TOU

T1—

.

MA

RY

LAN

DT

EN

CIN

Gu

rrtr

itie

AM

tL

ast.

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

WO

RK

SHEE

TD

PSI

DA

TEO

FO

FFEN

SED

ATE

OF

SEN

TEN

CIN

G

Qv

es

2N

o

I1

I2I

28

I5

CO

NV

ICT

ED

AT

TH

ISSE

NT

EN

CIN

GO

FFE

NSE

S

I0i4

I

B

CR

IMIN

AL

EV

EN

TS

Ii

WO

RK

SHEE

TS

__

__

__

OF

10I

1C

RIM

1NA

LEV

ENTS

1

1.P

lea

agre

emen

t-st

ate

nat

ure

of

JUK

I5U

IL.t

IUfl

Mil

eF

emal

e1B

Iack

Whi

leH

ispa

nic

Oth

er

____

21c

3410

I!

J624

OFF

EN

SES

CO

R)(

bff

éri

ée

Ag

ain

sta

Per

son

Onl

y)

2P

lea,

no

agre

em

ent

3C

ou

rttr

ial

0Ju

rytr

ial

CO

NV

ICTE

DO

FFE

NSE

TiTL

E-

AO

CC

OD

EM

O.

CO

DE.

AR

T.I.

SEC

TIO

NST

AT.

MA

XD

OC

KET

NU

MB

ER1

stR

ape

127/4

62

Lif

e0

00

00

00

52n

dA

Wl/

Murd

er27/1

230

10

00

00

00

5

3rd

Kid

nap

pin

g2

7/3

37

301

00

00

00

05

istO

ff

01 03 05 08

2nd

Off

01 0303

@05

=IV

=Ill

=II

Impo

sed,

susp

ende

d,pr

obat

ion.

fine

,re

stitu

tion,

com

mun

ityse

rvic

eSu

bseq

uent

Olte

nder

C.

Wea

pon

Usa

ge0

00

=N

OW

eap

on

11

1=

Wea

po

nO

ther

Than

Fir

earm

(=

FIr

earm

or

Explo

sive

lYes

21

ocrc

11

1

AC

T

CO

N_

PR

O_....

0.S

peci

alV

ulne

rabi

lity

ofV

ictim

=N

o

=Y

es

L_I_

_iLQ1

iE1

OF

FE

NS

ES

CO

RE

CS)

2nd

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

seJI

Yes

2N

o

RE

AS

ON

IFA

CT

UA

LS

EN

TE

NC

ED

EP

AR

TS

FR

OM

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

RA

NG

E

3rd

ConvIc

ted

Off

ense

L+

301

OFF

EN

DE

RSC

OR

E

lYes

2N

o

INS

TIT

UT

ION

AL

IPA

RO

LE

RE

CO

MM

EN

DA

TIO

NIA

DD

ITIO

NA

LIN

FO

.

EV

EN

TS

——

TL

RA

NG

E—

——

TU

RA

NG

E—

TO

TA

IJ

TO

TA

LS

_—

SEN

TE

NC

ING

JUD

GE

SIG

NA

TUR

EM

WO

RK

SHEE

TC

OM

PLET

EDBY

AP

j4. TI

TLE

so

uru

‘US

E

CO

PIES

:W

hite

-Jud

ge;

BIu

e-A

OC

;G

reen

-Att

ach

toC

omm

itm

ent

orPr

obat

ion

Ord

er;

Yel

low

-File

;P

ink-

Pro

secu

tion

;G

old-

Def

ense

(Rev

.71

87)

Page 93: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Firs

t.M

iddl

e)

G)o

11

A.

Rel

atio

nsh

ipto

CJS

Wh

enin

stan

tC

ount

Occ

urr

ed

Non

eor

Pen

ding

Cas

es

1=

Cou

rtor

Oth

erC

rim

inal

Just

ice

Suo

ervi

sion

B.

Juv

enil

eD

elin

quen

cy

o=

Not

Mor

eT

han

One

Fin

ding

ofD

elin

quen

cyor

over

age

25

(19=T

wo

orM

ore

Fin

din

gs,

No

orO

neC

om

mit

men

t=

Tw

oor

Mor

eC

om

jnil

lenj

C.

Pri

orA

dult

Cri

min

alR

ecor

d

o=

Non

e

Min

or

3M

oder

ate

5=

Maj

or

D.

Pri

orA

dult

Paro

IelP

robatl

WV

iola

tion

s=

No

1=

Yes

AD

CU

SEO

NLY

.D

ON

OT

WR

ITE

INSP

AC

EB

ELO

W

INC___

——

SU

S_

AC

T_

_._

__

,

5T

PR

O__R

AN

Ft RE

ST

CS

——

--—

-—

AC

T

CO

N_

PR

O__

Ft RE

ST

cS

—--

.--.

--—

——

SU

S—

——

——

AC

T_

_—

CO

N_

PR

O_..

.

Fl RE

ST—

CS

——

lYes

2N

o

EV

EN

TS

——

TL

RA

NG

E—

TU

RA

NG

E—

——

TOTA

LI

TO

TA

LS

____

M_

__

_A

_____

WO

RK

SHEE

TC

OM

PLET

EDBY

TO

TA

LN

_

TF1

RE

ST—

TC

S—

TR

AN

GE

TOU

T1—

.—

——

MA

RY

LA

ND

SE

NT

EN

CIN

GIO

FF

EN

DE

RN

AM

EIL

ast.

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

WO

RK

SHE

ET

ID

PSI

DA

TEO

FO

FFEN

SED

ATE

OF

SEN

TEN

CIN

G

Oes2N

ol

I2

1iS

iI

iA

TT

HIS

SEN

TE

NC

ING

OFF

EN

SES

NU

MB

ER

OF:

B

CR

IMIN

AL

EV

EN

TS

Ii

“‘“

OF

FE

NS

ET

ITL

E10

141

WO

RK

SHEE

TS—

_2O

F

10I

1C

RIM

INA

I.EV

EN

TS

1

1.P

lea

agre

em

ent

stat

enat

ure

of

DIS

POSI

TIO

NT

YPEIM

atF

.mal.

Bt.

ck

Whit

.H

ispan

icO

ther

BIR

TH

DA

TE

IJU

RIS

DIC

TIO

N

21

411

1010

1416

!324

AU

CC

OD

EM

D.

CO

DE

.A

RT

.I

SEC

TIO

N

OF

FE

NS

ES

CO

RE

jVjb

ffén

seA

aaln

sta

Per

son

Onl

y)—

2P

lea,

noag

reem

ent

3C

ourt

tria

l

)Jury

tria

l

1st H

cmdg

unU

sed

inC

omm

issi

ono

fa

Fel

on

y1

27/3

6B

(d)

201

00

00

00

05

2nd

3rd

Ui

STA

T.M

AX

POC

KET

NU

MB

ER

1st

Off

2nd

Off

3rd

011

A.

Ser

iousn

ess

Cat

egor

y

0101

01=

V.V

it

0303

03=

IV

P::

AC

TUA

LSE

NTE

NC

EU

lDE

LiN

ES

RA

NG

Eli

tO

If.n

s.

8L

To

151

B.V

icti

min

jury

00

0=

Noln

jury

11

1=

No

inju

ry,

Non

-Per

man

ent

(32

2=

Prnnnt

inlu

rvor

Dea

th

1st

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffense

Impo

sed,

susp

ende

d,pr

obat

ion.

Subs

eque

ntfin

e,re

stitu

tion,

com

mun

ityse

rvic

eO

ffend

er

lYes

2r:

o

02—

__

——

USE

-

C.

Wea

pon

Usa

ge

00

0=

NoW

eapon

11

1=

Wea

pon

Oth

erT

han

Fir

earm

22

=F

irea

rmor

Explo

sive

D.S

p.cl

aiV

ulne

rabi

lity

ofV

ictim

=N

o

=Y

es

2nd

Oil

.ns. T

O

3rd

OIl

ens.

__

__

_

TO

OV

ERA

LLG

UID

EL

INE

SR

AN

GE

(Fo

rM

ult

iple

Co

un

tsO

nly)

461

TO

L+

30Y

L___E]

I_i_

IOFFE

NSE

SCO

RE

CS)

2nd

Con

vIct

edO

ffen

se1

Yes

2N

o

RE

ASO

NIF

AC

TUA

LSE

NT

EN

CE

DE

PAR

TS

FRO

MG

UID

EL

INE

SR

AN

GE

3rd

Con

vIct

edO

ffen

se

[.J

OF

FE

ND

ER

SC

OR

E

INS

TIT

UT

ION

AL

IPA

RO

LE

RE

CO

MM

EN

DA

TIO

N1A

DD

ITIO

NA

LIN

FO

.

SEN

TE

NC

ING

JUD

GE

SIG

NA

TUR

E

P,A

. TITL

E

TOU

T2—

—-—

lOS

E

CO

PIES

:W

hite

-Jud

ge;

BIu

e-A

OC

;G

reen

-Att

ach

rim

itm

ent

orP

roba

tion

Ord

er;

Yel

low

-File

;P

ink-

Pro

secu

tion

;G

old-

Def

ense

(Rev

.71

87)

Page 94: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 6

MULTIPLE OFFENSES — MULTIPLE CRIMINAL EVENTS

OFFENDER’S NAME: R W_____DATE OF BIRTH: 01/10/64SEX: MaleRACE: WhiteDATE OF OFFENSES: 05/10/85

05/25/85

OFFENSE DESCRIPTION:

DOCKET NO: 00000006DATE OF PLEA/VERDICT: 01/05/86DISPOSITION TYPE: Binding Plea

Agreement as to Sentence MaximumJURISDICTION: Harford CountyCONVICTED COUNT: Distribution of PCP

27/286Assault with Intent to Murder27/12

(Rev. 3/87)

On 05/10/85, as part of a narcotics investigation, two undercoverpolicemen purchased fifom the defendant a 2—oz. vial of a liquid whichwas later identified as PCP. The defendant was arrested and releasedon $10,000.00 bond.

On 05/25/85, police responded to a report of a shooting in ashopping center parking lot. POlice were informed by the victim thathe was talking about buying some “grass” with a man he had met in abar. An argument ensued and the man pulled out a gun and shot thevictim, hitting him in the right arm. The victim was treated in ahospital for a flesh wound and released. Based on the informationprovided by the victim and witnesses at the bar, a warrant was obtainedand the defendant was arrested at his home.

On 01/05/86, the defendant pled guilty to one count ofDistribution of PCP 27/286 and one count of Assault with Intent toMurder 27/12.

OFFENDER’S PRIOR RECORD:

JUVENILE:

Date Offense Disposition

03/23/80 Possession of Marijuana Delinquent;probation

1 year

E- 29

Page 95: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SA4PLE CASE 6 (Continued)

ADULT:

Date Offense Disposition

09/12/82 Possession of Cocaine 4 years suspendedCarrying a Handgun 1 year suspended; 2 years

probation

Offender was placed on 2 years adult probation in 1982.He successfully completed his probationary period.

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORESDISTRIBUTION OF PCP 27/286

OFFENSE SCORE:

There is no offense score for drug offenses.

COFFENDER SCORE:

NOTE: The offender score used in computing guidelines formultiple criminal events is the same for each event. Thehighest score for any event at the time of this sentencingshould be used throughout.

OFFENDER SCORE:

A. Relationship to CJS When Instant Offense Occurred

Defendant was not under any supervision at thetime of the instant offense. 0 points

B. Juvenile Delinquency

Offender was found delinquent forPossession of Marijuana 0 points

C. Prior Adult Criminal Record

Step I — Possession of Cocaine — Category VCarrying Handgun — Category VII

(Rev. 3/87)

B- 30

Page 96: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 6 (Continued)

The number of prior convictions according toSeriousness Category are:

SERIOUSNESS NUMBER OF PRIORCATEGORY CONVICTIONS

I 0II 0III 0IV 0V 1VI 0VII 1

Step II — Since the offender’s most serious adultconviction was in Seriousness CategoryV, refer to the block in Appendix TableB.1 which indicates one SeriousnessCategory V conviction. This blockidentifies the record as “Minor”.

Step III — An offender with a minor recordreceives 1 point 1 point

D. Prior Adult Parole/Probation Violations

None. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE 1 point

GUIDELINES RANGE FOR DISTRIBUTION OF PCP

An examination of Appendix Table C.2a or C.2b shows that therecommended range for Distribution of PCP with an offender score of 1point is 1Y—3Y.

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORESASSAULT WITH INTENT TO MURDER 27/12

NOTE: Even though there were only two convicted offenses at thissentencing, a second worksheet must be used because eachconvicted offense was part of a separate criminal event.

(Rev. 3/87)E— 31

Page 97: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 6 (Continued)

OFFENSE SCORE

A. Seriousness Category of Instant Offense

As shown in Appendix A, Assault with Intentto Murder is a Category III Offense. 5 points

B. Victim Injury

Victim was shot but not permanently injured. 1 point

C. Weapon Usage

Firearm was used. 2 points

D. Special Vulnerability of Victim

Victim over 10 and under 60 years oldand not mentally nor physicallyhandicapped. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE 8 points

OFFENSE SCORE: CThe offender score is the same for all criminal events at this

sentencing event, 1.

GUIDELINES RANGE FOR ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO MURDER

An examination of Appendix Table C.la or C.lb shows that therecommended range for an offense score of 8 and an offender score of 1is 5Y—1OY.

OVERALL GUIDELINES RANGE FOR THE SENTENCING EVENT

The overall guideline range for the sentencing event according tothe procedure defined on page would be to add the upper ranges and toadd the lower ranges, resulting in a cumulative range of 6—13 years (1year plus 5 years and 3 years plus 10 years).

Criminal GuidelineEvent Offense Range

1 Distribution of PCP 27/286 1—3 years2 Assault with Intent to

Murder 27/12 5—10 years6—13 years

(Rev. 3/87)

E— 32

Page 98: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

II1III5J

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

.RK

SHE

ET

IW

0303

03=

IV

0505

05=

lit

0808

08=

II

10

10

10

TOU

T1

TOU

T2—

—-—

IUS

E

PSI

DA

TEO

FO

FFE

NSE

hA

TE

OF

SEN

TE

NC

ING

IYes@

NaQ

151110181

sII

R

CO

NV

ICT

ED

CR

IMIN

AL

AT

IHIS

SE

NT

EN

CIN

GO

FF

EN

SE

SE

VE

NT

SW

OR

KSH

EE

TS

—1

oN

UM

BE

RO

F:

Ioi

IIm

ICR

IMIN

AL

EV

EN

TS

1

DIS

PO

SIT

ION

TY

PE

agre

emen

tst

ate

nat

ure

of

Bin

din

gagre

em

ent

as

tose

nte

nce

max

imum

Mal

eF

em

ale

Bla

ckW

hite

His

pan

icO

ther

I2

1lO

llI0

1616

2P

lea,

noag

reem

ent

3C

ourt

tria

l

4Ju

rytr

ial

CO

NV

ICT

ED

OF

FE

NS

ET

ITL

E—

—A

OC

CO

DE

MD

.C

OD

E.

AR

T.

ISE

CT

ION

STA

T.

MA

X.

DO

CK

ET

NU

MB

ER

1st

Dis

trib

uti

on

of

PCP

27/2

86

201

00000006

2nd

3rd

OF

FE

NS

EsC

OR

ES

)rO

ftri

seA

gaIn

sta

Per

son

Onl

y)1s

t Off

2nd

oft

3rd

Off

A.

Ser

ious

ness

Cat

egor

y

0101

01=

V-V

u

QE

EN

DE

RSC

OR

E

__

__

__

_

A.

Rel

atio

nshi

pto

CJS

Whe

nIn

stan

tC

ount

Occ

urre

dN

one

orP

endi

ngC

ases

1=

Cou

rtor

Oth

erC

rim

inal

.Iii

qti

rpcin

prv

isin

n

AD

CU

SEO

NL

Y.

DO

NO

TW

RIT

EIN

SP

AC

EB

EL

OW

INC

SU

S

PR

O__R

AN

Fl RE

ST

SI—

02—

USE

GU

IDEL

INES

AC

TU

AL

SE

NT

EN

CE

RA

NG

E

__

__

__

__

_

Cs

let

Olt

ense

LT

O

31

1st

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

se

Impo

sed,

susp

ende

d,pr

obat

ion.

fine

,re

stitu

tion

com

mun

ityse

rvic

e

-B

.V

icti

mIn

jury

00

0=

Nol

niur

y1

11

=N

oin

jury

,N

on-P

erm

anen

t

22

2=

Per

man

ent

Inju

ryor

Dea

thC

.W

eapo

nU

sag

e

00

0=

NoW

eapon

11

1=

Wea

pon

Oth

erT

han

Fir

earm

22

2=

Fir

earm

orE

xplo

sive

Subs

eque

ntO

ltend

er

lYes

2ro

B.

Juven

ile

Del

inquen

cy

Not

Mor

eT

han

One

Fin

ding

ofD

elin

quen

cyor

over

age

251

=T

wo

orM

ore

Fin

din

gs,

No

orO

neC

om

mit

men

t2

=T

wo

orM

oreC

ott

en

jC

.P

rior

Adu

ltC

rim

inal

Rec

ord

0=

Non

e

=M

inor

3=

Mod

erat

e

5=

Majo

r—

0.P

rior

Adu

ltP

aro

IeIP

robaII

’V

iola

tion

s(=

No

=Y

es

00

0=

No

11

1=

Yes

D.

Spe

cial

Vul

nera

bili

tyof

Vic

tim

2nd

0! f

nse T

O

3rd

Off

ense

TO

OV

ERA

LLG

UID

ELIN

ESR

AN

GE

(For

Mul

tipl

eC

ou

nts

Onl

y)

61TO

131

1__1[

ZEi_

EiO

FFE

NSE

SCO

RE

(5)

2nd

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

se[‘es

2N

o

SUS

AC

T

CO

N_

PR

0_

Fl RE

ST

Sli

s____

CO

N_

PR

O_.._

Fl RE

ST

3rd

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

se

RE

AS

ON

IFA

CT

UA

LS

EN

TE

NC

ED

EP

AR

TS

FR

OM

GU

iDE

LiN

ES

RA

NG

E

Lo.L

IO

FFE

ND

ER

SCO

RE

lYes

2N

o

INS

TIT

UT

ION

AL

IPA

RO

LE

RE

CO

MM

EN

DA

TIO

NIA

DD

ITIO

NA

LIN

FO

.

SEN

TEN

CIN

GiU

DG

E

EVEN

TS—

TL

RA

NG

E—

——

TU

RA

NG

E—

TO

TA

LI

TO

TA

LS

_____

TO

TA

LN

__

.

TF1 RE

ST

TC

S—

——

TR

AN

GE

SIG

NA

TU

RE

L_

__

__

D_____

WO

RK

SHE

ET

CO

MPL

ET

ED

BY

Judg

eT

ITL

E

CO

PIES

:W

hrte

-iud

ge,

Blu

e-A

OC

;G

reen

-Att

ach

toC

omm

itm

ent

orP

roba

tion

Ord

er;

Yel

low

-File

;P

ink-

Pro

secu

tion

;G

old.

Def

ense

(Rev

.71

87)

Page 99: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

DIS

PO

SIT

ION

TY

PE

Olea

agre

em

ent.

sta

tenatu

reo

f

Bin

din

gag

reem

en

tas

tose

nte

nce

max

imum

A.

Rela

tio

nsh

ipto

CJS

Wh

en

Inst

ant

Co

un

tO

ccurr

ed

No

ne

or

Pen

din

gC

ases

1=

Co

urt

or

Oth

er

Cri

min

al

Ju

sti

ce

Su

nerv

isio

nB

.Ju

venil

eD

eli

nquency

Not

More

Th

an

On

eF

indin

go

fD

eli

nq

uen

cy

or

over

age

25

1=

Tw

oor

More

Fin

din

gs,

No

or

On

eC

om

mit

ment

2=

Tw

oor

More

Co

rnhnen1

C.

Pri

or

Adult

Cri

min

al

Record

PR

O__R

AN

Fl RE

ST

Cs—

——

.—-—

.

02—

._

_—

usE

TO

TA

LN

_—

TF

1

RE

ST

TC

S—

——

TR

AN

GE

TO

UT

1—

.

LD

__

__

WO

R1

SH

EE

TC

OM

PL

ET

ED

BY

Jw3ge

TO

UT

2—

PSI

DATE

OFO

FFEN

SED

ATE

OF

SEN

TEN

CIN

G

Ives

ON

o2

85

--[

CO

NV

ICT

ED

CR

IMIN

AL

AT

TH

ISS

EN

TE

NC

ING

OF

FE

NS

ES

EV

EN

TS

WO

RK

SH

EE

Tn

—1

orN

UM

BE

RO

F:

10i2

IIO

i2

ICR

IMIN

AL

EV

EN

TS

2

MA

RY

LAN

DSE

NT

EN

CIN

G10

EN

DE

RN

AM

E(L

ast,

Fir

st.

Mid

dle

)I

Mil

eF

em

ale

Bu

ck

Wh

ite

His

panic

Oth

.rI

______________________

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

_______________________________________________

I

BIR

TH

OA

TE

1JUR

ISD

ICT

ION

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

WO

RK

SHEE

TW

R2

1i

if1

0I6

!4!

12

2Pl

ea,

noag

reem

ent

3C

ourt

tria

l

4Ju

rytr

ial

CO

NV

ICT

ED

OF

FE

NS

ET

ITL

EA

OC

CO

DE

MD

.C

OD

E.

AR

T.

1.S

EC

TIO

NS

TA

T.

MA

X.

DO

CK

ET

NU

MB

ER

1 St A

Wl

Murd

er,

27

/12

301

00

00

00

06

2nd

3rd

I‘

1)1

AD

CU

SE

ON

LY

.D

ON

OT

WR

ITE

INS

PA

CE

BE

LO

W

INC

SU

S_____

AC

T_

__

.,.._

OFF

EN

SESC

OR

bff

én

seA

gai

nst

aP

erso

nO

nly)

-

1st

Off

2n

dO

ft3rd

Off

A.

Seri

ousness

Cate

gory

0101

01=

V-V

Il

0303

03

=IV

0505

=Il

l

0808

08=

II

10

10

10

=

OF

FE

ND

ER

SC

OR

EcU

IDE

LlN

ES

AC

TU

AL

SEN

TE

NC

E—

-R

AN

GE

B.

Vic

tim

Inju

ry

00

0=

Noin

jury

11

=N

oin

jury

,N

on-P

erm

anen

t

22

9P

prm

nn

nt

inlu

ryor

Dea

th

let

Oll

en

se

LT

O

101

1st

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

se

Impo

sed,

susp

ende

d,pr

obat

ion,

-fi

ne,

rest

itutio

n,co

mm

unity

serv

ice

Subs

eque

nlO

llend

er

C.

Wea

pon

Usa

ge0

00

=N

oW

eapon

11

1=

Wea

pon

Oth

erT

han

Fir

earm

(2

2=

Fir

earm

orE

xplo

sive

isiiq

lYes

2r:

o

D. S

peci

alV

ulne

rabi

lity

ofV

ictim

00

=N

o

i_JLI

B__i_

1O

NS

ESC

OR

E(5

)

2nd

Oh

mic

TO

3rd

Off

ence

_____

TO

OV

ERA

LLG

UID

ELIN

ESR

AN

GE

(For

Mul

tipl

eC

ou

nts

Onl

y)

61T

O

13

1

0=

No

ne

Min

or

3=

Mod

erat

e

5=

Maj

or

D.

Prio

rA

dult

Paro

IoIP

robati

E’

Vio

lati

ons

No

1=

Yes

AC

T

CO

N_

PR

O__

Fl RE

ST

cS—

.——

—.—

.-—

---.

2nd

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

se1

Yes

2N

oA

CT

_____

CO

N_

PR

O_

_

FI_____

RE

ST

3rd

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

seII

Yes

2N

o

RE

AS

ON

IFA

CT

UA

LS

EN

TE

NC

ED

EP

AR

TS

FRO

MG

UID

EL

INE

SR

AN

GE

OF

FE

ND

ER

SC

OR

E

1NS

TIT

UT

ION

AL

IPA

RO

LE

RE

CO

MM

EN

DA

TIO

NIA

DD

ITIO

NA

LIN

FO

.

EV

EN

TS

——

TL

RA

NG

E—

TU

RA

NG

E—

TOTA

LI

TO

TA

LS

___

—_

SFN

TE

NC

ING

JUD

GE

SIG

NA

TU

RE

TIT

LE

j‘.‘

E

Page 100: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 7

MULTIPLE OFFENSES FROM SINGLE AND MULTIPLE CRIMINAL EVENTS

OFFENDER’S NAME: M K_____DATE OF BIRTH: 06/10/68SEX: MaleRACE: BlackDATE OF OFFENSES: 09/10/85

12/09/85

OFFENSE DESCRIPTION:

DOCKET NO: 00000007DATE OF PLEA/VERDICT: 02/20/86DISPOSITION TYPE: Binding Plea

Agreement as to Actual SentenceJURISDICTION: Baltimore CityCONVICTED COUNT: Robbery with a

Deadly Weapon 27/488Robbery 27/486Assault CL

(Rev. 3/87)

On 09/10/85, a 32—year old male, answering the door in hisapartment, was confronted by a man wielding a revolver and demandingmoney. The victim relinquished his wallet, but the assailant forcedthe victim into the bedroom and tied his hands and feet with his ownneckties. After ransacking the bedroom, the gunman left. As soon ashe could free himself, the victim called police and reported theincident.

On 12/09/85, police responded to a call at an apartment house.Upon arriving, they were given custody of a man who, accdrding to asecurity guard, had forced his way into a woman’s apartment and triedto attack her. In questioning the victim, police learned that she hadopened the door thinking her boyfriend had arrived, but a strange manhad burst in. The victim stated that she was instructed to give himher money because he had a gun in his pocket and would use it. Afterhanding over her purse, she was pushed into the bedroom and told to getundressed. She was resisting when her boyfriend appeared. As the boyfriend and the assailant struggled, she went to the phone and summonedsecurity who helped to hold the defendant. A starter pistol was foundin his pocket.

On 02/20/86, the defendant pled guilty to Robbery with a DeadlyWeapon from the first event and Robbery and Assault from the secondevent.

E- 35

Page 101: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 7 (Continued)

OFFENDER’S PRIOR CRIMINAL RECORD:

NOTE: The offender score used in computing guidelines for

multiple criminal events is the same for each event. The

highest score for any event at the time of this sentencing

should be used throughout.

JUVENILE: No juvenile record was found for the name and birthdate

provided.

ADULT:

Date Offense Disposition

11/30/85 Theft under $300 PBJ, 1 year probation

Offender is currently on probation.

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORES

ROBBERY WITH A DEADLY WEAPON 27/488 - CRIMINAL EVENT 1

COFFENSE SCORE:

A. Seriousness Category of Instant Offense

As shown in Appendix A, Robbery with aDeadly Weapon is a Category III Offense. 5 points

B. Victim Injury

No injury. 0 points

C. Weapon Usage

Handgun was used. 2 points

D. Special Vulnerability of Victim

Victim over 10 and under 60 years oldand not mentally nor physicallyhandicapped. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE 7 points

C(Rev. 3/87)

E- 36

Page 102: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 7 (Continued)

OFFENDER SCORE:

A. Relationship to CJS When Instant Offense Occurred

The offender was on probation at the time ofthe second criminal event. 1 point

B. Juvenile Delinquency

No record found. 0 points

C. Prior Adult Criminal Record

Step I — theft under $300 — Category VII

The number of prior convictions according toSeriousness Category are:

SERIOUSNESS NUMBER OF PRIORCATEGORY CONVICTIONS

I 0II 0III 0IV 0V 0VI 0VII 1

Step II — Since the only conviction is inSeriousness Category VII, referto the block in Appendix TableB.1 which indicates one SeriousnessCategory VII conviction. This blockidentifies the record as “Minor”.

Step III — An offender with a minor recordreceives 1 point 1 point

0. Prior Adult Parole/Probation Violations

The offender does not get a point here becausehe had no violations except for the offensesof this sentencing event. He has already beenpenalized in “A” for committing these offenseswhile under supervision. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENDER SCORE 2 points

(Rev. 3/87)

37

Page 103: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 7 (Continued)

GUIDELINES RANGE FOR ROBBERY WITH A DEADLY WEAPON OF CRIMINAL EVENT 1

An examination of Appendix Table C.la or C.lb shows that therecommended range for an offense score of 7 and an offender score of 2is 5Y—9Y.

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORESROBBERY 27/486 — CRIMINAL EVENT 2

NOTE: A second worksheet must be used for this separate criminalevent.

OFFENSE SCORE:

A. Seriousness Category of Instant Offense

As shown in Appendix A, Robbery is aCategory IV Offense. 3 points

B. Victim Injury

No injury. 0 points

C. Weapon Usage

A starter pistol was used; therefore,1 point is given for a weapon otherthan a firearm. 1 point

D. Special Vulnerability of Victim

Victim over 10 and under 60 years oldand not mentally nor physicallyhandicapped. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE 4 points

OFFENDER SCORE:

The offender score is the same for all offenses in this sentencingevent, 2.

(Rev. 3/87)

38

Page 104: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 7 (Continued)

GUIDELINES RANGE FOR ROBBERY CRIMINAL EVENT 2

An examination of Appendix Table C.la or C.lb shows that therecommended range for an offense score of 4 and an offender score of 2is 1Y—5Y.

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORESASSAULT -CRIMINAL EVENT 2

OFFENSE SCORE:

A. Seriousness Category of Instant Offense

As shown in Appendix A, Assault is aCategory V offense. 1 point

B. Victim Injury

No injury. 0 points

C. Weapon Usage

A starter pistol was used; therefore, 1point is given for a weapon other thana firearm. 1 point

D. Special Vulnerability of Victim

Victim over 10 and under 60 years oldand not mentally nor physicallyhandicapped. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENSE SCORE 2 points

OFFENDER SCORE:

The offender score is the same for all offenses in this sentencingevent, 2.

GUIDELINES RANGE FOR ASSAULT - CRIMINAL EVENT 2

An examination of Appendix Table C.la or C.lb shows that therecommended range for an offense score of 2 and an offender score is 2is P—1SM.

(Rev. 3/87)

E- 39

Page 105: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 7 (Continued)

COVERALL GUIDELINES RANGE FOR THE SENTENCING EVENT

To determine the overall guideline range for the sentencing event,

add the respective lower and upper limits of the guideline ranges foreach criminal event. These ranges are the highest upper and highestlower ranges from each event. (See Sample Case 4 and the explanationon page 16.) The overall guideline range in this instance would be 3.5years (3 years plus 6 months) to 12 years (8 years plus 4 years):

Criminal GuidelineEvent Offense Range

1 Robbery with a Deadly Weapon 5—10 Years2 Robbery 1—5 Years2 Assault

__________

6—15 Years

C(Rev. 3/87)

R-40

Page 106: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Firs

t.M

iddl

e)

Joi2

ICR

IMIN

ALE

VEN

TII

1

B.

Juv

enil

eD

elin

quen

cy

Not

Mor

eT

han

One

Fin

ding

ofD

elin

quen

cyor

over

age

251

=T

wo

orM

ore

Fin

din

gs.

No

orO

neC

om

mit

men

t—

2=

Tw

oor

Mor

eC

om

jiij

tmen

C.

Pri

orA

dult

Cri

min

alR

ecord

TO

TA

LN

_—

TF1 RE

ST

TC

S—

——

TR

AN

GE

TO

UT

1

TO

UT

2—

!US

E—

MA

RY

LA

ND

ITE

NC

ING

urt

nutt

trI

IAM

t(L

ast.

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

WO

RK

SH

EE

TK

DATE

OFSE

NTE

NC

ING

LCIN

OO

FFE

NSE

SN

UM

BER

OF:

M

1st

(0

P13W

DIS

PO

SIT

ION

TY

PE

‘le

aag

reem

ent

.st

ate

nat

ure

of

Bin

din

gag

reem

ent

asto

actz

.aZ

sen

ten

ce

3rd

Mal

eF

emal

eB

lsck

Whi

leH

ispm

nlc

Oth

erB

IRT

HD

AT

E1IU

RIS

DIC

TIO

N

22

340i6

11,0

16i8

24

CO

NV

ICT

ED

OF

FE

NS

ET

ITL

EA

OC

COD

EM

DCO

DE.

ART

.1.

SECT

ION

STA

T.M

AXD

OCK

ETN

UM

BER

OFF

EN

SES

CO

RjU

Off

rie

Ag

ain

sta

Per

son

Onl

y)__

-

2P

lea,

noag

reem

ent

3C

ourt

tria

l

4Ju

rytr

ial

2nd

-

II

11

27/4

88

201

1st

Off

2nd

OfI

3rd

Of f

A.

Ser

Iou

snes

sC

ateg

ory

0101

01=

V-V

ll

0303

=IV

0505

=III

0808

=II

10

00

00

00

07

QE

ES

Qfi_

_

______

A.

Rel

atio

nsh

ipto

CJS

Whe

nin

stan

tC

ou

nt

Occurr

ed

0=

Non

eor

Pen

din

gC

ases

Cou

rtor

Olh

erC

rim

inal

Just

ice

Suner

vis

ion

--

-

AD

CU

SEO

NL

Y.

DO

NO

TW

RIT

EIN

SP

AC

EB

EL

OW

(N

C___

——

SU

S_

DT

.—

._C

ON

PR

O__R

AN

Ft RE

ST

02—.

——

I,

GU

IDEL

INES

RA

NG

E

1st

Off

ense

91

1st

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffense

AC

TUA

LSE

NT

EN

CE

Impo

sed,

susp

ende

d,pr

obat

ion.

line,

rest

itutio

n,co

mm

unity

serv

ice

10=

IB

.V

icti

mIn

jury

c:!0

0=

11

1=

No

Inju

ry,

Non.P

erm

anen

t2

22

=P

erm

anen

tIn

jury

orD

eath

C.

Wea

pon

Usa

ge0

00

=N

oW

eapon

11

1=

Wea

pon

Oth

erT

han

Fir

earm

22

=F

irea

rmor

Exp

losi

ve

Subs

eque

ntO

tlend

er

-

lYes

2tt

o

00

11

D.S

peci

alV

ulne

rabi

lity

ofV

ictim

=N

o

=V

as

2nd

Off

ense T

O

3rd

Off

ense

__

__

_

TO

OV

ER

AL

LG

UID

EL

INE

SR

AN

GE

(For

Mul

tipl

eC

ou

nts

Onl

y)

61

TO

151

0=

Non

e

Min

or

3=

Mod

erat

e

5=

Maj

or

D.

Pri

orA

dult

Paro

IeIP

rob

atl

1fi

oIa

tions

(?=

No

1=

Yes

i!L

iL__lo

FF

EN

sESC

OR

E(S

)

2nd

Con

vict

edO

ffen

se1

Yes

2N

o

3rd

Con

vict

edO

ffen

se

RE

ASO

NIF

AC

TU

AL

SE

NT

EN

CE

DE

PAR

TS

FRO

MG

UID

EL

INE

SR

AN

GE

OF

FE

ND

ER

SC

OR

E

AC

T

CO

N_

PR

O__

Fl RE

ST

CS

—.-

——

--—

-—-.

-—

SU

S____

CO

N__

PR

O_...

Fl RE

ST

CS

——

——

EV

EN

TS

——

TL

RA

NG

E—

——

TU

RA

NG

E—

TO

TA

LI

TO

TA

LS

_____

lYes

2N

o

INS

TIT

UT

iON

AL

IPA

RO

LE

RE

CO

MM

EN

DA

TIO

NIA

DD

ITIO

NA

LIN

FO.

SEN

TE

NC

ING

JUD

GE

SIG

NA

TU

RE

G_

__

__

K_______

WO

RKSH

EET

COM

PLET

EDBY

S.

A. TIT

LE

CO

PIE

S:W

hite

-Jud

ge;

BIu

e-A

OC

,G

reen

-Att

ach

toC

om

mit

men

tor

Pro

bati

onO

rder

;Y

ello

w-F

ile;

Pin

k-P

rose

cuti

on,

Gol

d-D

efen

se(R

ev.

7187

)

Page 107: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

Qff

JD

ER

SC

OR

E

__

__

__

_

A.

Rel

atio

nsh

ipto

CJS

Whe

nIn

stan

tC

ou

nt

Occ

urr

ed

o=

Non

eor

Pen

din

gC

ases

Cou

rtor

Oth

erC

rim

inal

Just

ice

Su

oer

vis

ion

B.

Juven

ile

Del

inquen

cy

Not

Mor

eT

han

One

Fin

ding

ofD

elin

quen

cyor

over

age

251

=T

wo

orM

ore

Fin

din

gs,

No

orO

neC

om

mit

men

t2

=T

wo

orM

ore

Corp

nji

taen

Pri

orA

dult

Cri

min

alR

ecor

d

o=

Non

e

Min

or

3=

Mod

erat

e

5=

Maj

or

D.

Pri

orA

dult

paro

IeIP

robati

W’

VIo

lati

ons

No

1=

Yes

OV

ERA

LLG

UID

ELIN

ESR

AN

GE

(For

Mu

ltip

leC

ounts

Onl

y)

61T

O

15

1

TO

TA

LN

_—

TF1 RE

ST—

TC

S—

——

TR

AN

GE

TO

UT

1

PSI

DA

TEO

FO

FFEN

SED

ATE

OF

SEN

TEN

CIN

G

lYes@

Nol

I21

0191

8

MA

RY

LAN

DSE

NT

EN

CIN

GfO

FFEN

DER

NA

ME

(Las

t.F

irs.

Mal

eFe

mal

eBl

ack

Whi

teH

ispa

nic

Oth

erM

iddl

e)BI

RTH

DA

TEIJ

UR

ISD

ICTI

ON

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

WO

RK

SHEE

TK

M2

23

40i

10

168

CO

NV

ICT

ED

CR

IMIN

AL

AT

TH

ISW

OR

KSH

EE

TS

_____

OF

SEN

TEN

CIN

GO

FFE

NSE

SEV

ENTS

1C

RIM

INA

LE

VE

NT

S2

NuM

BE

RO

F:Io

,3J

I02

Ii

DIS

POSI

TIO

NT

YPE

1)P

lea

ag

reem

en

t-st

ate

natu

reof

Bin

din

gag

reem

ent

asto

actu

al

sente

nce

OFF

EN

SEsC

oR

E?v

rott

seA

gai

nst

aP

erso

nO

nly)

2P

lea,

noag

reem

ent

3C

ourt

tria

l

4Ju

rytr

ial

CO

NV

ICT

ED

OF

FE

NS

ET

ITL

EA

OC

COD

EM

D.C

OD

E.A

RT. 1

.SEC

TIO

NST

AT.

MAX

.D

OCK

ETN

UM

BER

1S

t

Ro

bb

ery

I2

7/4

86

101

00000007

2nd

Ass

au

ltC

L0

00

00

00

7

3rd

1st

Off

2nd

Off

3rd

OfI

A.

Ser

ious

ness

Cat

egor

y

0101

=V

-Vu

c’03

03=

IV

0505

05=

III

0808

08=

II

1010

10=

AD

CU

SEO

NLY

.DO

NO

TW

RIT

EIN

SPA

CE

BEL

OW

INC

__.

SUS

STA

—_

CO

N—

PR

O..

....

._R

AN

Ft RE

ST

CS

——

—-—

.

01 02.._

_—

USE

ACT

UA

LSE

NTE

NC

EG

UID

ELIN

ESR

AN

GE

1st

OtI

ens.

XT

O

51

1st

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

se

B.

Vic

tim

Inju

ry

0=

No

Inju

ry

1=

No

Inju

ry,

Non

-Per

man

ent

2=

prr.n

nt

lnlu

rvor

Dea

th

Impo

sed.

susp

ende

d,pr

obal

ion,

Subs

eque

ntlin

e,re

slitu

tion,

com

mun

ityse

rvic

eO

llend

er

iVes

21

o

C.

Wea

pon

Usa

ge0

00

=N

oWea

pors

71

=W

eapo

nO

ther

Tha

nF

Irea

rm

22

2=

Fir

earm

orE

xplo

sive

2nd

Oft

ense TO

18M

3rd

Off

ense

TO

D.S

peci

alV

ulne

rabi

lity

ofV

ictI

m

=N

o

=Y

es

__

_______________

____

OFF

EN

SESC

OR

E(S

)

2nd

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

seI

Yes

2N

o

3rd

ConvIc

ted

Off

ense

ItY

es2

No

AC

T

CO

N_

PR

O__

Fl RE

ST

AC

T...____

CO

N...

..,.

PR

O_

..

Fl RE

ST—

CS

——

——

RE

AS

ON

IFA

CT

UA

LS

EN

TE

NC

ED

EP

AR

TS

FRO

MG

UID

EL

INE

SR

AN

GE

OFF

EN

DE

RSC

OR

E

INS

TIT

UT

ION

AL

IPA

RO

LE

RE

CO

MM

EN

DA

TIO

NIA

DD

ITIO

NA

LIN

FO

.

EV

EN

TS

——

TL

RA

NG

E—

——

TU

RA

NG

E—

——

TO

TA

IJ

TO

TA

LS

___

——

SEN

TEN

CIN

GJU

DG

ESI

GN

ATU

RE

G WO

RKSH

EET

CO

MPL

ET

ED

BY

KS

.A

.TI

TLE

TO

uT2

——

TiE

——

CO

PIFS

:W

hit

A.l

iiuie

.R

l.A

flC

n.A

Itrh

tnn,t

,nt

nr

Prn

ht,

nn

flr,

1.,r-

V,.

ii-,

,.,

P.

P..

.,.

....

,..,

.

Page 108: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 8

MANDATORY MINIMuM SENTENCE

OFFENDER’S NAME: D W_____DATE OF BIRTH: 02/10/60SEX: MaleRACE: WhiteDATE OF OFFENSE: 07/19/86

OFFENSE DESCRIPTION:

DOCKET NO: 00000008DATE OF PLEA/VERDICT: 09/01/86DISPOSITION TYPE: Jury TrialJURISDICTION: Prince George’s CountyCONVICTED COUNTS: Manufacture of PCP

27/286(b) (2)

On 07/19/86, police, acting on a search warrant, conducted asearch of the defendant’s home. Police found a small lab andconfiscated a number of chemical compounds and three 1/2 liter bottlesof suspected PCP. Later chemical tests were positive for PCP. On09/01/86, the jury found the defendant guilty of manufacture of PCP.

12/28/75 Possession of Marijuana Delinquent; probation07/05/76 Possession of LSD Delinquent; probation

continued

ADULT:

01/06/80 Possession of LSD

04/10/83 Daytime Housebreaking07/20/84 Distribution of PCP

Carrying a Handgun

6 months, all but 10 dayssuspended; 1 yearprobation

65

monthsyears, 3 yearssuspended;

1 year concurrent

(Rev. 3/87)

Offender is currently on probation.

COMPUTATION OF OFFENSE AND OFFENDER SCORESMANUFACTURE OF PCP 27/286(b) (2)

There is no offense score for drug offenses.

OFFENDER’S PRIOR RECORD:

JUVENILE:

Date Offense Disposition

Date Offense Disposition

OFFENSE SCORE:

E- 43

Page 109: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 8 (Continued)

OFFENDER SCORE:

A. Relationship to CJS When Instant Offense Occurred

Offender was on probation at the time hecommitted the instant offense. 1 points

B. Juvenile Delinquency

Offender was over 25 years of age at the time

of the instant offense. 0 points

C. Prior Adult Criminal Record

Step I — Possession of LSD — Category VDaytime Housebreaking — Category IVDistribution of PCP — Category IIICarrying a Handgun — Category VII

The number of prior convictions according to

Seriousness Category is:

SERIOUSNESS NUMBER OF PRIORCATEGORY CONVICTIONS

CI 0II 0III 1IV 1V 1VI 0VII. 1

Step II — Since the most serious prior conviction

is in Seriousness Category III, referto the block in Appendix Table B.1 whichindicates one Seriousness Category IIIconviction. This block identifies therecord as “Major”.

Step III — An offender with a major recordreceives 5 points 5 points

D. Prior Adult Parole/Probation Violations

None. 0 points

TOTAL OFFENDER SCORE 6 points

(Rev. 3/87)

E- 44

Page 110: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

SAMPLE CASE 8 (Continued)

GUIDELINES RANGE

An examination of Appendix Table C.la or C.lb shows that therecommended range for manufacture of PCP and an offense score of 6 is7Y- 1 4Y.

Since the offender in this case is being sentenced pursuant to286(b)(2) (previous PC? Distribution) which carries a 10—year mandatoryminimum, the actual recommended range is 10—14 years, and 10 years ismandatory.

NOTE: If the offender was sentenced under 27/293 as asubsequent offender, the recommended guidelines range wouldbe 14—28 years or double the usual guidelines range.

(Rev. 3/87)

E- 45

Page 111: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

A.

Rela

tio

nsh

ipto

CJS

Wh

en

Insta

nt

Co

un

tO

ccurr

ed

o=

No

ne

or

Pen

din

gC

ases

Court

or

Oth

er

Cri

min

al

Ju

sti

ce

Su

nerv

isio

n

B.

Juvenil

eD

eli

nquency

No

tM

ore

Th

an

On

e

Fin

din

go

fD

eli

nq

uen

cy

or

over

age

25

1=

Tw

oor

More

Fin

din

gs,

No

or

On

eC

om

mit

men

t

=T

wo

or

More

Com

mjL

n3eg

C.

Pri

or

Ad

ult

Cri

min

al

Record

o=

No

ne

1=

Min

or

3=

Mo

dera

te

Majo

r

D.

Pri

or

Adult

Paro

IeIP

ro

batIi

,,,V

4o

iatl

on

s

(4N

o

1=

Yes

DIS

PO

SIT

ION

TY

PE

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

AC

TU

AL

SE

NT

EN

CE

RA

NG

E

1st

Off

ense

__

__

TO

141

2nd

Off

ense T

O

OV

ER

AL

L

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

RA

NG

E

(Fo

rM

ult

iple

Co

un

tsO

nly

)

TO

P.A

,fl

TL

E

TO

TA

LN

__

TF1 RE

ST—

TC

S—

——

TR

AN

CE

TO

UT

1—

.

PSI

‘DA

TE

OF

OFF

EN

SEI

DA

TE

OF

SE

NT

EN

CIN

G

QYeS

2N

oI 0

1711

1918

161

CO

NV

ICT

ED

AT

TH

ISS

EN

TE

NC

ING

OF

FE

NS

ES

NU

MB

ER

OF

:IC

RIM

INA

L

EV

EN

TS

MA

RY

LA

ND

SE

NT

EN

CIN

Gf0R

NA

ME

(Las

t.Fi

rst.

Mid

dle)

Mal

eF

.meI

e‘B

lack

Whi

teH

ispan

icO

th.r

BIR

TH

DA

TE

JuR

IsD

lcT

loN

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

WO

RK

SH

EE

TW

D2

i0

2f1

0I6

oI16

Ii

WO

RK

SHE

ET

U—

1o

IO1

CR

IMIN

AL

EV

EN

TII

1

1.P

lea

ag

reem

en

t.sta

tenatu

reo

f2

Ple

a,

no

agre

em

ent

3C

ourt

tria

l

Jury

tria

l

AD

CU

SEO

NL

Y.

DO

NO

TW

RIT

EIN

SP

AC

EB

EL

OW

CO

NV

ICT

ED

OF

FE

NS

ET

ITL

EA

OC

CO

DE

MD

.C

OD

E,

AR

T.

I.SE

CT

ION

STA

T,

MA

X.

DO

CK

ET

NU

MB

ER

1 St

Man

ufa

ctu

reo

fPO

Psu

bse

qu

ent

off

end

erunder

7/8

6(h)(2)

I1

27/2

86

201

00

00

00

08

2nd

II

3rd

UI

OF

FE

NS

ES

CO

RE

iY(b

ffén

seA

gain

st

aP

ers

on

Only

)-

2E

EN

DF

RS

CO

RE

IN

C_

_—

SU

S

1st

Off

2nd

Off

3rd

Off

A.

SerI

ou

sn

ess

Cate

gory

0101

01V

-VII

0303

03=

IV

0505

05=

III

0808

08II

inin

in

T-

9n1

AC

T_

__

__

....n__C

ON

PR

O__R

AN

Fl RE

ST

CS

——

——

-—-.

-—

02 USE

1st

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

se

B.V

Icti

mIn

jury

00

0N

oln

jury

11

1=

No

Inju

ry,

No

n-P

erm

an

en

t

22

2=

Perm

anent

Inju

ryor

Death

C.

Wea

pon

Usa

ge

00

0=

NoW

eapon

11

1=

Weap

on

Oth

er

Than

Fir

earm

22

2=

Fir

earm

orE

xplo

sive

lrn

pss

ed,

susp

ended,

pro

bat

ion,

Subs

eque

ntfi

ne,

rest

itut

ion,

com

mun

ity

serv

ice

Ofle

nder

JY

es

2o

3rd

Off

ense

TO

00

0=

No

11

1=

Yes

0.S

pecia

lV

uln

era

bil

ity

of

Vic

tlni

__

__

_________________

OF

FE

NS

ES

CO

RE

CS)

2nd

Co

nv

icte

dO

ffen

se2

No

SU

S

AC

T

CO

N_

PR

O__

Fl RE

ST—

cS

——

..—

.-—

-.-—

SIJS

——

—__—

CO

N_

PR

O_

_

Ft RE

ST—

CS

——

——

3rd

Co

nv

icte

dO

f ten

se

RE

AS

ON

IFA

CT

UA

LS

EN

TE

NC

ED

EP

AR

TS

FR

OM

GU

IDE

LIN

ES

RA

NG

E

[JO

FFE

ND

ER

SCO

RE

lYes

2N

o

INS

TIT

UT

ION

AL

IPA

RO

LE

RE

CO

MM

EN

DA

TIO

NIA

DD

ITIO

NA

LIN

FO

.

EV

EN

TS

——

TL

RA

NG

E—

TU

RA

NG

E—

——

TO

TA

LI

TO

TA

LS

___

—_

SEN

TE

NC

ING

JUD

GE

SIG

NA

TU

RE

P

____N

______

WO

RK

SHE

LE

CO

NPt

.ET

ED

BY

IOU

T2

fnpirc

Whe.

Pi,

=,A

flC

’,,

,,,

....

O,,.

C,4

....

v..

ii,...,

ri..

fl.

.,...,..,.*

......

Page 112: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

INDEX

Accessory Before or After the Fact, 9, 10, B—2Actual Sentence, 5, 13—14, 20Adult Record, 11—13, B—1—B—6Aggravating Factors, 15,20—21Appeals from District Court, 1Attempt to Commit an Offense, 9, B—2

Board, Sentencing Guidelines, i

Case Information, Worksheet, 6—8Changes to Worksheet, 2, 5Classification of Criminal Record, Procedures, B—1—B—6Commitment Order, 4—5Concurrent Guidelines Sentence Ranges for Multiple Offenses,

In single criminal events, 15—18, E—3—E—28In sentencing single and multiple criminal events together,

18—20, E—35Consecutive Guidelines Sentence Ranges

More than one Seriousness Category I or II offense, 17—18, E—20Multiple criminal events, 18—20, E—29—E—42

Conspiracy to Commit an Offense, 9, B—2Contempt, B—iConvicted Offenses,

In multiple offense sentencing, 7, 15—20Number, 2, 6—7Scoring for each, 2, 8, B—i

Convictions Out—of—State, B—2Court Trials, Disposition Type, 8Credit for Time Served, 13, 20Criminal Event

Number, 2, 6—7, 15—20Scoring, 2, 15—20, B—i

Criminal Justice System, Offender’s RelationshipWhen Convicted Offense Occurred, ii, 12

Criminal Non—Support, B—iCriminal Offenses, Maryland, 1, 9

Alphabetical listing, Appendix AHow to identify on worksheet, 7

Criminal Record, Juvenile, ii, i2, B—4Age factor, 12Commitments, ii, 12, B—4Findings of delinquency, ii, 12, B—4Probation violation, adult only, i2Scoring guidelines worksheet, ii, 12

Criminal Record, Prior Adult, ii, i2Criteria for Prior Record Form, B—4Decay factor, B—2In offender score, 12Major, minor or moderate, ii, 12, B—i, B—4, B—5, B—6Out—of—state convictions, B—2

(Rev. 3/87)

I-i

Page 113: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

INDEX

Parole violations, 12—13, B—2Procedures for classifying, 12, B—1—B—6Probation violations, 12—13, B—2

Criteria for Prior Record Form, 5, B—i, B—4

Death Penalty, 1, 14—15, A—14Decay Factor in Prior Records, 12, B—2Defense Counsel, 2, 5Delinquency, Juvenile, 11, 12, B—4Departures from the Guidelines, 4Disposition Types, 6, 7—8

Court trial, 8Jury trial, 8Plea agreement, 8Plea, no agreement, 8

Distribution, Guidelines Worksheet, 2, 4—5Drug Offenses

Definition, 1Guidelines ranges, 15, 20, C—5, C—7Guidelines scoring, 8, 11—13, E—7—E—9No offense score, 8Sample case, E—7—E—9Sentencing matrix, C—5

Embezzlement, A—14, B—2 CExclusions from Guidelines, 1Explosives, 10

False Pretenses, A—14, B—2Federal Youth Corrections Act, B—iFeigned Weapon, 10Felonies Not Listed in Appendix A, 1Firearms, 10First Degree Murder

Death penalty, 1Guidelines Sentence, 1, 15, A—i4

Goals of Sentencing Guidelines, iiGuidelines Scoring, 8—13

Offender score, 11—13Offense score, 8—li

Guidelines Sentence, 2—3, 13—21Departures from, 4Goals, iiMatrices

Person, C—iDrug, C—5Property, C—6

Net non—suspended incarceration, 2, 4, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20Probation, 4, 5 C,

(Rev. 3/87)

1-2

Page 114: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

INDEX

Ranges, 2, 13Person, C—3—C—4Drug, C—7Property, C—li

Guidelines WorksheetCase Information, 6Changes, 2, 5Distribution, 2, 4, 5In Sample Cases,

Drug offense, one convicted offense, E—7—E—9Mandatory minimum sentence, E—43—E—46Multiple criminal events, E—29—E—42Multiple convicted offenses, single criminal event, E—14—E—19

Multiple convicted offenses, two or more Seriousness

Category I or II offenses in one criminal event, E—20—E—28

Person offense, one convicted offense, E—3—E—6Property offense, one convicted offense, E—l0—E—13

Single and multiple criminal events, E—35—E—42Numbering 2, 6—7Sample, 3Six—part pressure sensitive paper, 2

Gun, Weapon Usage, 9, 10

Handguns, 8

Injury, Victim, 9—10Instant Offense, Seriousness Category, 9, B—i

Jurisdiction Codes, 6, Appendix DJury Trial, 8Juvenile Delinquency, ii, 12,B—4

Age factor, 12Commitments, ii, 12, B—4Findings of delinquency, ii, 12, B—4Probation violation, adult only, 12Scoring on guidelines worksheet, ii, 12

Larceny, A—14, B—2Local Laws, 1, B—i

Mandatory Sentences, 20Subsequent offenders, 20Drug offenses, 20Sample case, E—43—E—46

MatricesDrug offense, C—5Offense against a person, C—iProperty offense, C—9

(Rev. 3/87)

I- 3

Page 115: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

6

INDEX cMaximum Statutory Penalties

For Maryland offenses, Appendix AGuidelines sentence range in excess of, 20

Merged Offenses in Sentencing, 6Minimum Statutory Penalties, 20Misdemeanors Not Listed in Appendix A, 1Multiple Offense Sentencing, 15—20

Multiple criminal events, 18—20, B—i—B—2Sample Cases, E—14—E—42Single criminal event, 16—17

Exception when more than one Seriousness CategoryI or II convicted offenses, 17, 18

Single and multiple criminal events, 19—20Municipal Ordinances, 1; B—iMurder, First Degree

Death penalty, 1Guidelines sentence, 1, 15, 33

-New trials after Appeal, 1Non—Suspended Incarceration, 2, 4, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20Numbering

Convicted offenses, 2, 6—7Criminal events, 2, 6—7, 15—20Worksheets, 6—7

Offender Score, 8, 11—13Offense Score, 8—11, 13Offenses, 1, 6, 7, 9, Appendix AOut—of—State Convictions, B—2

Parole Commission, 5Parole and Probation, Division of, 5

Completion of worksheets, 2Presentence investigations, 2,5

Parole RevocationsExcluded from guidelines, 1

Parole Violations, Prior AdultFor purposes of guidelines offender score, 12—13

Person OffensesDefinition, 1Firearm offense, 8Guidelines ranges, 14—15, C—3Guidelines scoring, 8—10, 14—15Sample case, E—3—E—6Sentencing matrix, C—i

Pleas, 8Plea Negotiation, 8Prayers for Jury Trial from District Court, 1Presentence Detention, 20Presentence Investigation (PSI), 2, 5

(Rev. 3/87)

I- 4

Page 116: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

INDEX

Prior Adult Criminal Record: See Criminal Record, Prior Adult

Probation, 4, 5Probation before Judgment, B—i

Probation RevocationsExcluded from guidelines, 1

Probation ViolationsFor purposes of guidelines offender score, 12—13

Property OffenseDefinition, 1Guidelines scoring, 8, 11—13

No offense score, 8Guidelines ranges, 15, C—9, C—li

Sample case, E—iO—E—13

Sentencing matrix, C—9

Public local laws, 1, B—i

Reasons for Departing from Guidelines, 4

Receiving Stolen Goods, A—14, B—2

Reconsideration of Sentences, 14

Relationship to Criminal Justice System When Instant

Offense Occurred, 11 12

Sample Cases

D -Case 1, Offense Against a Person — Single Convicted

Offense, E—3—E—6

Case 2, Drug Offense — Single Convicted Offense, E—7—E—9

Case 3, Property Offense — Single Convicted Offense, E—1O—E—13

Case 4, Multiple Offenses — Single Criminal Event, E—14—E—19

Case 5, Offenses Against a Person — Multiple Offenses

from Categories I and II — Single CriminaL Event, E—20—

E—28 -

Case 6, Multiple. Offenses — Multiple Criminal Events, E—29—E—34

Case 7, Multiple Offenses from Single and Multiple

Criminal Events, E—35—E--42

Case 8, Mandatory Minimum Sentence, E—43—E—46

Sentence, Actual, 2, 13—14Sentences

ConcurrentIn single criminal events, 15—18. E—3, E—7, E—1O, E—14, E—20

In sentencing single and multiple criminal events together,

18—20, E—35Consecutive

More than one Seriousness Category I or II offenses, 17—18,

E—2 0Multiple criminal events, E—29—E—42

Reconsiderat ions, 14Guidelines, 2, 4

Sentencing outside the guidelines, 4

(Rev. 3/87)

1-5

Page 117: MarylandHon. Calvin R. Sanders Hon. Frederick C. Wright, III EX—OFFICIO MEMBERS Hon. Walter M. Baker, Chairman, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Charles G. Bernstein, Private

INDEX

Sentencing Guidelines RangesDrug, C—7Person, C—3Property, C—il

Sentencing MatricesDrug Offenses, C—5Offenses Against a Person, C—3Property Offense, C—9

Seriousness Category, Convicted Offense, 9, 15, 17, B-4Shoplifting, A—14, B—2Single Convicted Offense, 7Solicitation to Commit an Offense, 9, B—2State’s Attorney, 2, 5Statutory Maximum Penalties for Maryland Offenses, Appendix AStatutory Minimum Penalties, 20Subsequent Offenses, 20Suspended Incarceration, 5, 13

Theft Statute, A—14, B—2Traffic Offenses, B—i

Unsuspended Incarceration, 2, 4, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20

Victim, Especially Vulnerable, 10Victim Injury, 9—10 CViolations, Prior Adult Parole, 12—13Violations, Prior Adult Probation, 12—13Vulnerable Victim, 10

Weapon UsageDefinition, 10 -

Explosives, 10Weapons other than firearms, 10

White Collar Offenses, 20—21Worksheet

Case Information, 6Changes, 2, 5Completed by, 2Distribution, 2, 4, 5,In sample cases, Appendix ENumbering, 2, 6—7Sample, 3

C(Rev. 3/87)

I- 6