Homeless -2010-11

18
Homeless - 2010-11 Homeless Count Percent A - Living in emergency or transitional shel 424 14.7% B - Sharing the housing of other persons 2,191 75.7% D - Living in cars, parks, campgrounds etc 10 0.3% E - Living in hotels or motels 243 8.4% F - Awaiting foster care 26 0.9% 2,894 Total 100.0% Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Transcript of Homeless -2010-11

Homeless -2010-11Homeless Count Percent

A - Living in emergency or transitional shel 424 14.7%

B - Sharing the housing of other persons 2,191 75.7%

D - Living in cars, parks, campgrounds etc 10 0.3%

E - Living in hotels or motels 243 8.4%

F - Awaiting foster care 26 0.9%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By Assigncode - 2010-11Assigncode Count Percent

392 13.5%

- 8 0.3%

0 - 0 - In-Zone 1,633 56.4%

1 - 1 - SAP 4 0.1%

2 - 2 - Fundamental School Student 41 1.4%

4 - 4 - Home Education Student 1 0.0%

6 - 6 - Administrative Placement 9 0.3%

7 - 7 - Out of Zone - Close to Home 230 7.9%

8 - 8 - Magnet Program / Charter School 135 4.7%

9 - 9 - Out of Area due to prog Requirements 92 3.2%

A - A - Professional Courtesy Approval 8 0.3%

S - S - Sibling Preference 2 0.1%

X - X - Out of Zone - No Transportation 339 11.7%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By Diplomatyp - 2010-11Diplomatyp Count Percent

- 11 0.4%

W06 - Standard HS Diploma 40 1.4%

W07 - Special Diploma-Option 1 4 0.1%

W08 - Certificate of Completion 1 0.0%

W8A - Cert Compl-No Pass Grad Test 5 0.2%

WFT - Std HS Diploma-Alt Asment 2 0.1%

WFW - Std HS Diploma-FCAT Waiver 6 0.2%

WGD - FL Diploma-GED only 1 0.0%

ZZZ - Not Applicable 2,824 97.6%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By Doorways - 2010-11Doorways Count Percent

- Student not in Doorways 2,877 99.4%

D - D - Student Withdrawn from Doorways 4 0.1%

Y - Y - Student is in the Doorways Prog 13 0.4%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By Endyrst -2010-11Endyrst Count Percent

A - Promoted, criteria not met 40 1.4%

D - Disability / opted to remain 1 0.0%

N - Not enrolled in KG-12 at end of yr 3 0.1%

P - Promoted/ Graduated/ Completed 2,632 90.9%

R - Retained 164 5.7%

Z - Not applicable (grd PK,30,31) 54 1.9%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By Ethniccode -2010-11Ethniccode Count Percent

1 0.0%

A 103 3.6%

B 876 30.3%

H 457 15.8%

I 12 0.4%

M 134 4.6%

W 1,311 45.3%

2,894Total 100.0%

A - Asian

B - Black

H - Hispanic

I - American Indian

M - MultiRacial

W - White

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By Freemeals -2010-11Freemeals Count Percent

0 - Did Not Apply 170 5.9%

1 - Applied Not Eligible 3 0.1%

2 - Eligible for Free Lunch 2,622 90.6%

3 - Eligible for Reduced Lunch 99 3.4%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By Gender -2010-11Gender Count Percent

F - Female 1,397 48.3%

M - Male 1,497 51.7%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By Grade -2010-11Grade Count Percent

01 319 11.0%

02 303 10.5%

03 295 10.2%

04 228 7.9%

05 263 9.1%

06 200 6.9%

07 199 6.9%

08 209 7.2%

09 113 3.9%

10 100 3.5%

11 153 5.3%

12 91 3.1%

KG 368 12.7%

PK 53 1.8%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By L35Math -2010-11L35Math Count Percent

2,219 76.7%

L35M 675 23.3%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By L35Read -2010-11L35Read Count Percent

2,274 78.6%

L35R 620 21.4%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By LEP - 2010-11LEP Count Percent

5 0.2%

LF - Two year followup 48 1.7%

LP - K-12 tested or pending 3 0.1%

LY - LEP in LEP classes 199 6.9%

LZ - Exited after two year followup 40 1.4%

TZ - Tested - not eligible 146 5.0%

ZZ - Not applicable 2,453 84.8%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By PriExc - 2010-11PriExc Count Percent

2,232 77.1%

C - Orthopedically Impaired 4 0.1%

D - Occupational Therapy 1 0.0%

F - Speech Impaired 78 2.7%

G - Language Impaired 68 2.3%

H - Deaf or Hard Of Hearing 7 0.2%

I - Visually Impaired 3 0.1%

J - Emotional/Behavioral Disabl 97 3.4%

K - Specific Learning Disabled 137 4.7%

L - Gifted 65 2.2%

O - Dual-Sensory Impaired 1 0.0%

P - Autism Spectrum Disorder 16 0.6%

T - Developmentally Delayed 10 0.3%

U - Established Conditions 8 0.3%

V - Other Health Impaired 38 1.3%

W - Intellectual Disability 34 1.2%

Z - Not Applicable 95 3.3%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By Speccode - 2010-11Speccode Count Percent

20 0.7%

- Not Applicable 2,362 81.6%

03 - 03 - IB 2 0.1%

04 - 04 - PCCA 2 0.1%

07 - 07 - 21 Century Learning Cnter 2 0.1%

08 - 08 - Career Academy A 1 0.0%

11 - 11 - Center for Wellness 1 0.0%

12 - 12 - Criminal Justice 5 0.2%

13 - 13 - AIP/PMP (grade KG) 65 2.2%

15 - 15 - Bus/Econ/Tech Academy 5 0.2%

16 - 16 - Read 180 4 0.1%

17 - 17 - AIP/PMP (grades 01-05) 392 13.5%

18 - 18 - Global Studies/Lit Arts 5 0.2%

19 - 19 - Fine & Performance Arts 10 0.3%

20 - 20 - Math Sci Tech & Frgn Lng 2 0.1%

21 - 21 - 5000 Role Models of Exc. 10 0.3%

27 - 27 - ESP Program (Elem Schl) 3 0.1%

28 - 28 - First Responders 2 0.1%

29 - 29 - Engineering Program 1 0.0%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By U504_Qualcode - 2010-11U504_Qualcode Count Percent

2,788 96.3%

A - Physical or Mental Impairment 100 3.5%

Z - Not 504 Eligible 6 0.2%

2,894Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By DescCode - 2010-11DescCode Count Percent

0 0.0%

01 - Alcohol - SESIR 1 0.0%

02 - Strike/Student 269 5.1%

03 - Strike/Adult 60 1.1%

03S - Battery - SESIR 32 0.6%

04 - Drugs - SESIR 41 0.8%

05 - Fight/Minor 222 4.2%

05S - Fight/Major - SESIR 11 0.2%

06 - Leaving Campus 56 1.1%

07 - Defiance/Insubordination 1,026 19.3%

08 - Profanity/Obscene Language 434 8.2%

09 - Repeated Misconduct 291 5.5%

10 - Skipping Class 378 7.1%

11 - Tobacco - SESIR 18 0.3%

12 - Stealing/Theft Less than $300 43 0.8%

12S - Stealing/Theft - SESIR 5 0.1%

13 - Dangerous Implement 7 0.1%

13S - Weapons - SESIR 5 0.1%

14 - Bus Misconduct 312 5.9%

15 - Cheating 12 0.2%

16 - Class / Campus Disruption 673 12.7%

16S - Major Campus Disruption 19 0.4%

17 - Vandalism less than $1K 15 0.3%

18 - Missed Detention 111 2.1%

19 - Other Offense 199 3.8%

19S - Campus Crime - SESIR 2 0.0%

20 - Missed Saturday School 17 0.3%

21 - Excessive Tardy 368 6.9%

22 - Not Cooperating 235 4.4%

23 - Unauthorized Location 222 4.2%

24 - PE Misconduct 13 0.2%

25 - Forgery, Non-Crime 1 0.0%

30 - Motor Vehicle Theft - SESIR 1 0.0%

33 - Sexual Harassment - SESIR 3 0.1%

34 - Sexual/Lewd Conduct - SESIR 1 0.0%

35 - Threat/Intimidation - SESIR 46 0.9%

36 - Trespassing - SESIR 2 0.0%

37 - Electronic Device 120 2.3%

38 - Bullying/Harassment – SESIR 33 0.6%

5,304Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By DispCode - 2010-11DispCode Count Percent

94 1.8%

5 - Suspension from Bus [5] 112 2.1%

7 - Juvenile Referral [7] 1 0.0%

8 - Expulsion from Bus [8] 1 0.0%

9 - ABS-Alternate Bell Schedule-DOE [I] 80 1.5%

A - Parent Contact [A] 286 5.4%

B - Parent Conference [B] 44 0.8%

D - Detention [D] 818 15.4%

G - Guidance Counseling [G] 44 0.8%

I - In-School Suspension-DOE [I] 1,580 29.8%

J - Behavioral Contract [J] 2 0.0%

K - Alternative Setting (In-House) [K] 1 0.0%

L - Seclusion-DOE [L] 13 0.2%

M - Mechanical Restraint-DOE [M] 1 0.0%

N - Saturday School [N] 57 1.1%

O - Out-of-School Suspension-DOE [O] 973 18.3%

P - Disciplinary Placement-DOE [P] 41 0.8%

Q - Youth Motivator [Q] 15 0.3%

S - Other SESIR Defined (example: tobacco cessation)-DOE [S] 6 0.1%

T - OCIP-On Campus Intervent Prg-DOE [I] 82 1.5%

V - Verbal Reprimand and Warning [V] 589 11.1%

W - Work Detail [W] 72 1.4%

Z - Misc (Non DOE Incident) [Z] 392 7.4%

5,304Total 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse

Homeless - By FCAT Achievement Levels - 2010-11

Count PercentMath

0 0.0%

1 407 30.9%

2 357 27.1%

3 356 27.0%

4 172 13.1%

5 26 2.0%

Subject Total 1,318 100.0%

Count PercentRead

1 470 32.4%

2 322 22.2%

3 423 29.2%

4 210 14.5%

5 26 1.8%

Subject Total 1,451 100.0%

Count PercentScience

1 197 42.0%

2 155 33.0%

3 99 21.1%

4 16 3.4%

5 2 0.4%

Subject Total 469 100.0%

Prepared by Assessment, Accountability and Research Data retrieved October 2012 from the PCS Data Warehouse