Hk3 / 8& ' +Î Â:Æ- f46E 3 .e3â9¢ E 3 8^@w 4v 8F Â · Hk3 / 8& ' +Î Â:Æ- f46E 3 .e3â9¢ E...
Transcript of Hk3 / 8& ' +Î Â:Æ- f46E 3 .e3â9¢ E 3 8^@w 4v 8F Â · Hk3 / 8& ' +Î Â:Æ- f46E 3 .e3â9¢ E...
Study for the prediction of damping and sound radiation characteristics due to structural shape changes
* * ** **
Ji Woo Yoo Jin-Kwan Suh Sang Woo Lee Jong Won Park Jun Hong Park
ABSTRACT
Applying damping sheets or dampers (dynamic or mass) can reduce noise from vibrating structure as well as vibration. However, this approach requires increases of weight and cost. If one can reduce structural noise by only modifying the structural shape, which would be the best practice. It is natural that the noise characteristics change when the structure is modified, but the recent experiment on the sunroof frame showed that the modification of the frame beads results in change of the structural damping, so that the corresponding noise can be reduced. In this context, the reason why the structural damping and the related noise upon an impact excitation is changed is theoretically investigated. The change of dynamic and damping characteristics of the strip panels when their shapes are modified is experimentally found and it is shown that such behaviours can be predicted by computer simulation. Some experimental specimen, mainly strip-type panels, are examined for the numerical verification, and especially damping ratios are investigated. Key Word : damping( ), noise( ), vibration( ), sound radiation( ), FEM, BEM, sunroof( ), structure( ), bead ( )
1.
, . ,
.
(damping sheet) (dynamic damper, mass damper) , 1
.
, ,
.(1) , ,
. ,
, .
, .
,
.
.
. .
, .
.
2.
2.1
2.1.1
KH Fig.1 ( )
; , E-mail : [email protected]
Tel : 031-368-0394, Fax : 031-368-2733 **
한국소음진동공학회 2014년 추계학술대회
332
B( ) , () .
, , B
.
Fig.1 KH Sunroof frame (Frame B as a noise source)
B Fig.2 ( )
( ) ( )
. Fig.2( )
- - 1.69
0.57 70% .
Fig.2 Shapes of Frame B. Upper, baseline; lower, after shape
modification
22..11..22
, Fig.2 ,
. .
- FE - ( )
-
( )
(Fig.3) .
Fig.3 Vibration decay times obtained by experiment and
conventional simulation method
22..22
, Fig. 4
( ) . .
Fig.4 Shapes of simplified specimens for the identification of
damping and noise characteristics
Fig.5
. .
, .
(2) .
Fig.5 Experimental set-up of a simplified specimen to identify
noise and vibration characteristics
. Fig.6 ( ) (
FFrraammee BB
KKHH SSuunnrrooooff
333
) .
Fig.6 Bolting condition at the boundary edge. Left, rigid bolting;
right, elastic bolting by inserting elastic foam
. (3), Oberst beam (4)
(wavenumber) ( ). Fig.7
2 (Fig.4 B1, A2) , .
1) A2 B1 , (Fig.7
curve ) A2 .
2) ,
A2 (Fig.7 ) .
Fig. 7 Changes of damping characteristics dependent on bolting
conditions at the boundary edge
, ,
.
22..33
.
,
. .
Fig. 8 . NASTRAN (
), BEM . (5)
Fig. 8 Simulation process for the prediction of damping
characteristics (improved simulation technique)
Fig. 9 B FE BEM .
, .
Fig.9 Improved simulation model for the prediction of sound
radiation from a structure in vibration Fig. 10 .
35 10z rxk k N/mm .
300Hz 590Hz ,
. B ,
334
. B ,
.
Fig.10 Noise level obtained by experiment (upper) and improved
simulation (lower)
Fig. 9 . Fig. 11
.
Fig. 11 Vibration decay times by experiment (left) and improved
simulation (right)
33..
, .
(1) .
(2) .
.
(3) , FEM BEM
. .
(4) .
. .
(1) , 2011, KH Sunroof P1
, . (2) Park, J., Mongeau, L., Siegmund, T., 2003, Influence of
support properties on the sound radiated from the vibrations of rectangular plates, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 264, pp.775-794..
(3) Cremer, L., Heckl, M., Ungar, E. E., 1988, Structure-Borne Sound 2nd ed., pp. 215-242.
(4) Danilov, O., Sgard, F., Olny, X., 2002, Oberst beam as a tool for complex Young's modulus measurement of porous materials, Forum Acousticum, Sevilla.
(5) VA One 2014 Tutorials Guide, ESI group.
335