104 .. ( xviii — xx .) ˆ ˛ -˚ ˜ ˇ˙ xviii — " xx ., ˝ ‘ - - - (17 54–1834), ‘ - - (1776–1812),
HIV testing for pregnant women: a rights-based analysis of changes in national policy Elizabeth King...
-
Upload
julian-shaw -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of HIV testing for pregnant women: a rights-based analysis of changes in national policy Elizabeth King...
![Page 1: HIV testing for pregnant women: a rights-based analysis of changes in national policy Elizabeth King XVIII International AIDS Conference, Vienna, Austria.](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110211/56649ef15503460f94c0332c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
HIV testing for pregnant women: a rights-based analysis of changes in national policy
Elizabeth KingXVIII International AIDS Conference,
Vienna, AustriaJuly 22, 2010
![Page 2: HIV testing for pregnant women: a rights-based analysis of changes in national policy Elizabeth King XVIII International AIDS Conference, Vienna, Austria.](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110211/56649ef15503460f94c0332c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What changes? Whose rights?
• HIV testing during pregnancy: new CDC policy, WHO/UNAIDS guidelines.
• Women may be put at risk for discrimination and violence when their HIV status becomes known.
• How are pregnant women’s rights protected under these new testing policies?
![Page 3: HIV testing for pregnant women: a rights-based analysis of changes in national policy Elizabeth King XVIII International AIDS Conference, Vienna, Austria.](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110211/56649ef15503460f94c0332c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Key findings: what rights?
• Inconsistent language leads to ambiguous interpretation of “opt-out” procedures
• Less emphasis on pre-test counseling • Emphasis is on the benefits, but little
consideration of the potential risks from testing
• Consent– is it really an option? Women’s autonomy in this process? Refusal?
![Page 4: HIV testing for pregnant women: a rights-based analysis of changes in national policy Elizabeth King XVIII International AIDS Conference, Vienna, Austria.](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110211/56649ef15503460f94c0332c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Implications: What comes next?
• Inclusion of training for counselors in the protocols
• Research to understand pregnant women’s perceptions of choice to test and right to decline a test
• Monitoring and evaluation, including field studies to understand how the new testing policies are implemented
![Page 5: HIV testing for pregnant women: a rights-based analysis of changes in national policy Elizabeth King XVIII International AIDS Conference, Vienna, Austria.](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110211/56649ef15503460f94c0332c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Thank you
UNC research team members: Suzanne Maman, Ali Groves, Matt Pierce, and Sarah Wyckoff
This research was funded by the Law and Health Initiative of the Open Society Institute
For more information see:http://www.soros.org/initiatives/health/focus/
law/articles_publications/publications/hivtesting_20080916