History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come...

20
History of Atomic Theory

Transcript of History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come...

Page 1: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

History of Atomic Theory

Page 2: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Democritus (c. 450 BCE)

• Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing”

• Response to this by atomists like Democritus: matter is made up of tiny indivisible particles (atomos)

• Atoms were thought of as retaining the identity of the object they made up.

Page 3: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Why is this model (idea) good?-Starts to get at conservation of matter

What things does this model fail to explain/ explain incorrectly?-Atoms are divisible

-We know atoms are not simply miniature versions of the objects they make up

Page 4: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Antoine Lavoisier

• Measured the masses of substances before and after a chemical reaction and found that they were always equal.

Conservation of Matter:• Matter can neither be created nor destroyed,

only transformed.

Page 5: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Joseph Proust

Law of Constant Composition• Same compounds always contained the same

proportions of elements no matter the size of the sample. (i.e. The mass of H2O is always 88.9% Oxygen and 11.1% Hydrogen.)

Page 6: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

John Dalton (1803)

Postulates:1) Each element is composed of extremely small, indivisible particles called atoms.2) All atoms of a given element are identical.3) Atoms are neither created nor destroyed in any chemical reaction.4) A given compound always has the same relative numbers and kinds of atoms.

Page 7: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Why is this model (idea) good?-Takes into account empirical data (i.e. Lavoisier,

Proust)

What things does this model fail to explain/ explain incorrectly?-Atoms are divisible

-Atoms are more or less identical, except they may have different weights (isotopes)

Page 8: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

The Idea of Electric Charge

• Charge is a physical property of matter, like mass.

• The charge of a particle is defined in relation to how it behaves in an electric field.

• Essentially… like charges will repel while opposite charges attract (sign convention is arbitrary).

Page 9: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Electrons

• Scientists knew about electrical currents

• A cathode ray tube (think TV, “the tube”) was one device used for studying electrical currents.

-One plate called anode (+) and one plate called cathode (-)

By the 1900s, scientists knew several things about the behavior of these rays:1) The ray could spin a small paddle wheel (particles!)2) Putting a magnet close to the beam would bend it in the direction

expected for negatively charged particles (- charge!)

Page 10: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Thomson Activity

Page 11: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Cathode Ray Tube

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzMh4q-2HjM

Page 12: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

JJ. Thomson (1896)

• Carefully measured the angle at which the beam could be deflected

• CONCLUSIONS:– Atoms were not indivisible balls, instead they had

some substructure (electrons!)– Determined charge-to-mass ratio of electrons

Charge = C = 1.76 x 108 C/g mass g

Page 13: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Tue 10/20

• Please turn your Chp. 3 outlines into the box

• Clear everything off your desk for the reading quiz

Page 14: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Millikan (1909)

• Successfully measured the charge on a single electron. Charge = 1.60 x 10-19 C

• Thus: 1.60 x 10-19 C = 9.11 x 10-28 g 1.76 x 108 C/g

CONCLUSION:-Electron is an extremely light particle!

only about 1/2000 the mass of H

Page 15: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:
Page 16: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Protons

• Thomson had established that atoms contained negatively charge particles (electrons).

• Atoms were known, however, to be electrically neutral.

• There must be an equal number of positively charged particles… but how are they arranged?

Page 17: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Rutherford Articles + Outline

• Please read thoroughly through the 3 articles on Rutherford and his experiment.

• Fill out your outline sheet with as much detail as possible.

• Take any extra notes on Rutherford that you think may be helpful in answering the prompt.

Page 18: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Rutherford (1909)Observations Conclusions

Most alpha particles passed directly through gold foil

The atom IS mostly empty space

Some alpha particles were scattered at large angles, and 1 in 20,000 were sent directly back to the source

All of the atom’s positive charge, and most of its mass was centered in a small core (nucleus)

Page 19: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

Gold Foil Experiment

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pZj0u_XMbc

Page 20: History of Atomic Theory. Democritus (c. 450 BCE) Was commonly held that “something” could come from “nothing” Response to this by atomists like Democritus:

MODELS (so far)

DALTON THOMSON RUTHERFORD