HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY & CURRENT PRODUCTIVITY …

1
HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY & CURRENT PRODUCTIVITY EXPLAIN LEMUR COMMUNITY STRUCTURE James P. Herrera Gerstner Scholar Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Mammalogy & Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, Richard Gilder Graduate School [email protected] , herrerajamesp.weebly.com Methods Summary 1) Lemur species richness, phylogenetic diversity & endemism increased with increasing habitat productivity & heterogeneity 2) Functional diversity highest in low productivity, hot, arid habitats 3) ~3,000 km 2 of deforestation within 100 protected areas years 2000 – 2014; up to 31% / park; highest deforestation in protected areas with high species richness Mantel correlation coefficients between measures of beta diversity & environmental dissimilarity r = 0.46, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.20 r = 0.46, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.22 r = -0.10, p = 0.41, R 2 = 0.009 r = 0.48, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.23 Correlations between habitat productivity & four measures of diversity in 100 protected areas Data on lemur species composition in 100 protected areas (PAs) + environmental layers: climate, productivity, heterogeneity, river barriers, forest cover, & deforestation. Functional traits (body size, activity pattern, diet) gleaned from literature sources. Beta diversity: Sorenson’s index: taxonomy, phylogeny, & functional traits; partial Mantel tests of relationship b/w lemur beta diversity & environmental dissimilarity. Alpha diversity: species richness, phylogenetic & functional mean nearest taxon distance, phylogenetic endemism; linear mixed-effects models testing relationship between diversity metrics & environment Acknowledgements: Funding: the Gerstner Scholarship, RGGS (AMNH), National Science Foundation (GRFP), Turner Fellowship & AGEP-T- FRAME Scholarship (SBU); Helpful discussions: P Wright, E Seiffert, L Dávalos, W Jungers, C Nunn, N Simmons, J Flynn, C Raxworthy, CBC BioLunch Discussion group, AMNH ECEM, S Desbureaux Introduction Distribution of diversity metrics in 100 protected areas

Transcript of HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY & CURRENT PRODUCTIVITY …

Page 1: HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY & CURRENT PRODUCTIVITY …

HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY & CURRENT PRODUCTIVITY EXPLAIN LEMUR COMMUNITY STRUCTURE

James P. HerreraGerstner Scholar Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Mammalogy & Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, Richard Gilder Graduate [email protected], herrerajamesp.weebly.com

Methods

Summary

1) Lemur species richness, phylogenetic diversity & endemism increased with increasing habitat productivity & heterogeneity

2) Functional diversity highest in low productivity, hot, arid habitats

3) ~3,000 km2 of deforestation within 100 protected areas years 2000 – 2014; up to 31% / park; highest deforestation in protected areas with high species richness

Mantel correlation coefficients between measures of beta diversity & environmental dissimilarity

r = 0.46, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.20

r = 0.46, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.22

r = -0.10, p = 0.41, R2 = 0.009

r = 0.48, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.23

Correlations between habitat productivity & four measures of diversity in 100 protected areas

Data on lemur species composition in 100 protected areas (PAs) + environmental layers: climate, productivity, heterogeneity, river barriers, forest cover, & deforestation. Functional traits (body size, activity pattern, diet) gleaned from literature sources. Beta diversity: Sorenson’s index: taxonomy, phylogeny, & functional traits; partial Mantel tests of relationship b/w lemur beta diversity & environmental dissimilarity. Alpha diversity: species richness, phylogenetic & functional mean nearest taxon distance, phylogenetic endemism; linear mixed-effects models testing relationship between diversity metrics & environment

Acknowledgements: Funding: the Gerstner Scholarship, RGGS (AMNH), National Science Foundation (GRFP), Turner Fellowship & AGEP-T-FRAME Scholarship (SBU); Helpful discussions: P Wright, E Seiffert, L Dávalos, W Jungers, C Nunn, N Simmons, J Flynn, C Raxworthy, CBC BioLunchDiscussion group, AMNH ECEM, S Desbureaux

Introduction

Distribution of diversity metrics in 100 protected areas