Hill Country Conservancy Lunch and Learn August 17, 2010.

20
Hill Country Conservancy Lunch and Learn August 17, 2010

Transcript of Hill Country Conservancy Lunch and Learn August 17, 2010.

Hill Country ConservancyLunch and Learn

August 17, 2010

Substantial, long-term population growth.

Huge increases in diversity.

An increasingly divided urban region.

RR

RR

RR

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%19

70

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

United States

All U.S. Metropolitan Areas

Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos

Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis

BK

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Percent of Population Growth Attributed to Natural Increase in Austin-Round Rock MSA

Source: U.S. Census BureauBK

Source: Internal Revenue ServiceBK

Job creation.Quality of life relative to competitor cities.Extremely strong sense of place.Synergy of Opportunity: created by the triple-whammy

presence of: the University of Texas, thriving private-sector Tech Clusters and being the state capital.

Physical setting of central Texas. Austin straddles an ecotone, a confluence of ecosystems.

The state’s enormous growth has had great influence.International Immigration: Austin has become an

emerging gateway.

RR

RR

RR

2007 American Community Survey Data, Table B19113, US Census Bureau.RR

RR

Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%19

70

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

United States

All U.S. Metropolitan Areas

Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos

BK

Source: U.S. Census Bureau. Living wage estimates are from Poverty in America for city of Austin: $33,842 and $18,138. http://www.livingwage.geog.psu.eduBK

Jobs 2009Job Growth2002-2009 Percent

Professional/technical services 105,826 32,939 45%

Real estate 53,001 21,493 68%

Food services/drinking places 69,078 18,491 37%

Administrative/support svcs 61,747 12,027 24%

Ambulatory health care svcs 38,269 11,122 41%

Local government 77,931 9,895 15%

State government 75,250 9,334 14%

Securities, investments 15,388 6,100 66%

Educational services 18,423 5,781 46%

Source: EMSI. Includes full-time and part-time employment.BK

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Workforce Solutions Capital Area, Workforce Solutions Rural Capital Area. Calculations by CAPCOG. UI is an abbreviation for unemployment insurance and may not represent the true unemployed population.BK

46%

47%

54%

58%

64%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Bastrop County

Travis County

Williamson County

Caldwell County

Hays County

Percentage of Workers in County Who Live Outside County, 2008

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

BK

Population Growth

Conservation Value

JW

Are there parallels to this catch-22 in other arenas? What kind of impact might these demographic trends

have on conservation? How does conservation philosophy have to change

given these demographic trends? Carrying capacity has a strong environmental

definition, how does that concept apply to a fast growing region like ours?

What are the environmental implications of the diversification of our population?

Audience Q&AJW

Brian Kelsey, Civic Analytics

[email protected]

Ryan Robinson, Demographer, City of Austin

[email protected]

Jim Walker, AICP, Director of Sustainability, UT-Austin

[email protected]