High Speed Rail - Riverside County
-
Upload
darrell-talbert -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
739 -
download
1
description
Transcript of High Speed Rail - Riverside County
Riverside County High Speed Rail UpdateRiverside County High-Speed Rail Update
January 29, 2010
California’s Plan
800800--mile systemmile systemSteel wheel on steel Steel wheel on steel railrail100% l l t i100% l l t i100% clean electric 100% clean electric powerpowerMaximum operatingMaximum operatingMaximum operating Maximum operating speed of 220 mphspeed of 220 mphDedicated track, Dedicated track, ,,gradegrade--separatedseparatedSafe and reliableSafe and reliable
Merced
Altamont Pass
San Francisco -San Jose
Merced -Sacramento
Merced -
Central Valley -San Jose
Merced Bakersfield
Palmdale -Bakersfield
Los Angeles -
Bakersfield
Los Angeles -Anaheim
Palmdale
Los AngeleSan DiegoAnaheim San Diego
Los Angeles -San DiegoSa ego
Includes Includes CommissionCommissionCommission Commission supported Isupported I--15 option15 option160+ miles160+ miles160 miles160 milesEight potential Eight potential stationsstationsStrong intermodal Strong intermodal connectivityconnectivityFour countiesFour countiesThree Caltrans Three Caltrans di t i tdi t i tdistrictsdistricts
Los Angeles - San DiegoProject Overviewj
Description 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Description 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Notice of Intent/Notice of Preparation (NOI/NOP)
Scoping Process We are here
Scoping Meetings
Alternatives Analysis We are here
Draft Project Description
15% Engineering15% Engineering
Environmental Technical Reports
Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS)
Selection of Preferred Alignment Alternatives and Station Locations
30% Engineering
Final EIR/EISFinal EIR/EIS
Record of Decision/Notice of Determination (ROD/NOD)
2009 Business Plan
• Updated Plan with more details thatUpdated Plan with more details that previous effort.
• Identify organization changes• Identify organization changes• Establishes outreach program• More information on ridership and
financial data than previous reports.
Legislative Analyst Report
• Improved Outreach and System DetailsImproved Outreach and System Details• Inadequate and Incomplete Discussion
of Riskof Risk– No risk management strategy
U k fid i j ti– Unknown confidence in projections– Inadequate discussion of types of risks
• Uninformative Timelines– Inconsistent order of events
Los Angeles County
DRAFT 9/09
San Bernardino Countyy
DRAFT 9/09
Riverside County
DRAFT 9/09
San Diego County
DRAFT 9/09
Southern California Inland Corridor Group (MOU Partners)p ( )
*
Local Working Group
Riverside County Technical Working Groupy g pLast Met in December 9, 2009
• Caltrans District 8• CHSRA
• County of Riverside • SCAG
• City of Corona• City of Lake Elsinore• City of Menifee
• SCAQMD• March JPA• RCTC
• City of Moreno Valley• City of Murrieta• City of Perris• Cit f Ri id
• RTA• University of California, Riverside• WRCOG
• City of Riverside• City of San Jacinto• City of Temecula• City of Wildomar
• Riverside County Board of Supervisors
• CVAG• SunlineCity of Wildomar Sunline• Local Tribes, Morongo,
Pechanga, Soboba
Public Scoping MeetingsPUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: Sept 17 – Nov 20 2009
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: Sept. 17 – Nov. 20, 2009
Monday, October 19 – Murrieta 95 AttendeesMurrieta Public Library
Tuesday, October 20 – Corona 45 AttendeesCorona Public Library - West Room
Thursday October 22 Riverside 53 AttendeesThursday, October 22 – Riverside 53 AttendeesBobby Bonds ParkCesar Chavez Community Center
Received 732 comments from Riverside County
Scoping Comments
RightRight ofof a needsa needsRightRight--ofof--way needsway needsNoise/vibration (adjacency impacts)Noise/vibration (adjacency impacts)P ki /l li d t ffi i tP ki /l li d t ffi i tParking/localized traffic impactsParking/localized traffic impactsFinancingFinancingSt ti l ti h ld id i lSt ti l ti h ld id i lStation locations should provide regional Station locations should provide regional multimodal connections and be located near multimodal connections and be located near planned smart growth areasplanned smart growth areasplanned smart growth areasplanned smart growth areasConcerned about physical barrier created by Concerned about physical barrier created by HST especially in older cities with historicHST especially in older cities with historicHST, especially in older cities with historic HST, especially in older cities with historic districtsdistricts
Alternatives Analysis
Today 12/2010
Initial Developmentof
Revise InitialDevelopmentof Alternatives
PMT/Authority/FRA/AG
Prepare Alternatives Analysis
Conduct OutreachtoAgenciesand Public
Prepare Alternatives Analysis (AA) Final
Conduct OutreachtoAgenciesand Publicof
AlternativesAlternativesAA Report Section
FRA/AG Review Report
and Public ( )Report
OPENHOUSE
Conduct Project Alternatives Staff Workshop
Make Presentation to CHSRABoard
Prepare Draft ProjectDescription
Coordination with SoCal ICG & TWGs
Ongoing Community & Agency Meetings, Outreach & Communications
Board
High-Speed Rail Funding
• $40-$45 Billion State Program$40 $45 Billion State Program• State Of California – Nov 2008 Prop 1A
– $9 billion for a statewide high-speed rail programAdditional $950 million for connecting services– Additional $950 million for connecting services (ie. Intercity Trains, Metrolink, LA Metro, BART, etc)
– Core section eligible for first round construction funding Anaheim to San Francisco only.g y
– Other sections such as LA to San Diego are eligible for planning funds.
F d l F di 25 33% f C t ti C t- Federal Funding 25-33% of Construction Costs $10 – 12 billion (New ARRA Program?)
- Public Private Partnerships from $4 5 $7 billi$4.5 – $7 billion.
Federal HSR ARRA Funding
• $8 Billion Available Nationally in ARRA$8 Billion Available Nationally in ARRA– $50 billion in applications from 24 states
• Aug 09 - California SubmittedAug 09 California Submitted$1.1 Billion in “Tracks 1,3,4” – HSR and Intercity Service– Includes $75 million in PTC – Metrolink– $38 million triple track LA-Fullerton
• Oct 09 – California Submitted$4.8 Billion “Track 2” Application for HSR
I l d d $42 5 illi f LA S Di i th– Included $42.5 million for LA-San Diego via the Inland Empire route for NEPA/CEQA doc