Application of Michelson type bolometric interferometer to CMB B mode polarization observations
High Resolution Observations of the CMB with the CBI Interferometer
description
Transcript of High Resolution Observations of the CMB with the CBI Interferometer
High Resolution Observations of the CMB with the CBI Interferometer
XVIIIth IAP Colloquium - July 1 2002
Carlo Contaldi
CITA
T. Readhead (Caltech)
T. Pearson (Caltech)
S. Myers (NRAO)
B. Mason (Caltech/NRAO)
J. Sievers (Caltech)
J. Cartwright (Caltech)
P. Udompraesert (Caltech)
M. Shepherd (Caltech)
A. Farmer (Caltech)
S. Padin (Caltech)
J. R. Bond (CITA)
C. Contaldi (CITA)
D. Pogosyan (U of Alberta)
U.-L. Pen (CITA)
M. Ruetalo (CITA/UofT)
P. Zhang (CITA/UofT)
J. Wadsley (McMaster)
S. Prunet (IAP)
•13 elements
•0.90 m dishes
•45’ FWHM
•78 baselines
•10 frequency channels 26-36 GHz
l~200
The Cosmic Background Imager
> 5000m Atacama Plateau Chile
10-channel single pointing uv-coverage 26-36 GHz
single pointing uv-coverage
mosaic pointings
CBI Power spectrum extraction
•Visibilities ‘gridded’ in uv plane [Myers at al. 2002].
•Quadratic estimator solves for the ML band powers
•6x7 field mosaic; ~10 hrs. 16 processor GS320 cluster @ CITA
•Foreground templates projected out using known positions
Sj = QijVi Cij = hSiS?j i
CB =P
` `W`
BC̀
C Tot = C N+C CMB+C src+C res
CBI Mosaic Power Spectrum
•3 6x7 field mosaics
•~ 145’x165’ each
•~ 40 sq. deg.
[Pearson et al. 2002]
“Silk” damping
eà (`=̀D)mD
Mosaic Window Functions
! c ! b ÒË Òtot ns üc
Weak
Weak + Flat +LSS
Flat + LSS + HST-h
0:17+0:08à0:06 0:022+0:015à0:009 0:40+0:25à0:27 0:99+0:12à0:12 1:05+0:09à0:08 0:24+0:18à0:17
0:13+0:02à0:01 0:025+0:010à0:008 0:64+0:10à0:13 1:01+0:10à0:07 0:15+0:17à0:11
0:13+0:02à0:01 0:027+0:009à0:008 0:68+0:05à0:07 1:04+0:08à0:07 0:19+0:15à0:13
CBI+DMR[Sievers et al. 2002]
CBI Deep Field
Power Spectrum
BOOMERanG2001
[Mason et al. 2002]
CBI High-l Excess
Significant power above l=2000. 3.5 inconsistent with zero and 3.1 inconsistent with best-fit model.
Secondary Anisotropies from Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect?
Amplitude ~ 4.5 higher than expected signal from residual low-flux sources
Estimate includes 50% error in residual source flux.
Raw map
Total Signal
CMB + ?
OVRO & NVSS Source residuals
SZE Angular Power Spectrum
•Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics (5123) [Wadsley et al. 2002]
•Moving Mesh Hydrodynamics (5123) [Pen 1998]
•143 Mpc 8=1.0
•200 Mpc 8=1.0
•200 Mpc 8=0.9
•400 Mpc 8=0.9
[Bond et al. 2002]
Dawson et al. 2002
Simulation of Deep Observations by the CBI
Input SZ map Reconstructed Signal
Bandpower Estimation with a SZ Foreground
CBI Pipeline recovers input SZE signal at observed amplitudes
Non-Gaussian scatter from the SZ signal is significant in the high-l band given the small areas observed
Single Deep Field (08h) simulated observation
Flat
HST-h
Priors
LSS parameters from CMB and other
Cosmological Surveys
•The CBI observations l<2000 give consistent parameters with those of previous experiments on larger angular scales
•Measurement of the damping tail at l>1000
•6’ scales probing ~1014MO seeds of clusters
•High-l excess; Simulations show the Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect fits the observed power for 8~1.0. This is in the high-end of the range allowed by CMB and LSS surveys
•SZE: high-accuracy determination of 8. Break 8-ΩM degeneracy ΩΛ
•Follow-up on excess
•Extended mosaic data ~ 80 sq. deg.
•Improved hydrodynamical simulations
Summary
•Optimally configured for resolution of peaks
•Polarization upgrade nearly complete
•Calibration runs in August
Polarization Observations
2002/3