HIDOE/ACS WASC Focus on Learning Self-Study Training Phase III
Transcript of HIDOE/ACS WASC Focus on Learning Self-Study Training Phase III
2019–2020 Schools
HIDOE/ACS WASC Focus on Learning Self-Study Training Phase III
Focus on Learning
2 2014 ©ACS WASC
HIDOE/ACS WASC FOL Accreditation Cycle
Focus on Learning
3 2014 ©ACS WASC
HIDOE/ACS WASC FOL Accreditation Cycle
2014 ©ACS WASC 4
Outcomes of Self-Study Process
2014 ©ACS WASC 5
Agenda
Chapter V: Action Plan
Chapters I-IV
Visit and Status
HIDOE Strategic Plan 2017-2020 Three-Year Academic Plan
ACSWASC © 2013 6
Task 5: Revise the Academic Plan. Establish an ongoing follow-up process to monitor implementation and accomplishment.
Product: Chapter V: Revised Academic Plan
HIDOE/ACS WASC Tasks
8
Review Findings with Stakeholders
Which of these ideas should become part of our three-
year Academic Plan?
ACS WASC ©2018-19
Alignment: Findings, Strengths, Growth Areas, Action Plan
ACSWASC © 2013 9
Action Plan
Criteria Strengths
Criteria Growth Areas Student
Learner Needs
Data
General Learner
Outcomes
Road to the Action Plan
ACSWASC © 2013 10
Academic Plan Questions
2014 ©ACS WASC 11
What is the format of the Three -Year Academic Plan?
How does it address the goals and objectives of the Hawaii Department of
Education and Board of Education Strategic Plan 2017-2020 ?
How is the Academic Plan linked to the data about students?
Academic Plan Format
12
Where are we now? Prioritize school’s needs as identified in one or
more of the following needs assessments: -Comprehensive Needs Assessment (Title I
Schools) -ACS WASC Self-Study: Identified Growth Areas
2014 ©ACS WASC
Academic Plan Format (cont.)
13
Addressing Equity: Sub-Group Identification In order to address equity, list the targeted sub-
group(s) and their identified needs. **Specific enabling activities listed in the academic plan should address identified sub-group(s) and their needs.
2014 ©ACS WASC
Academic Plan Format (cont.)
14
Organize: Identify your Academic Review Team Accountable Leads
• Name • Title • Responsibility (for implementation of the
school’s strategies and initiatives)
2014 ©ACS WASC
Academic Plan Format (cont.)
15
Goal 1 Student Success: • Objective 1: Empowered • Objective 2: Whole Child • Objective 3: Well Rounded • Objective 4: Prepared and Resilient
Goal 2 Staff Success: • Objective 1: Focused Professional Development • Objective 2: Timely Recruitment and Placement • Objective 3: Expanded Professional Pipeline
Goal 3 Successful Systems of Support • Objective 1: Innovation • Objective 2: Adequate and Expanded Resources • Objective 3: Efficient and Transparent Supports
2014 ©ACS WASC
Academic Plan Format (cont.)
16
For each goal (objectives): • Outcome: By the end of three years… • Rationale
2014 ©ACS WASC
Academic Plan Format (cont.)
17
For each goal (objectives): Planning Components • Desired Outcome • Enabling Activities • School Year(s) of Activity • ART accountable Lead(s) • Source of Funds • Evidence of Progress (relevant data used to
regularly assess and monitor progress)
2014 ©ACS WASC
Sample of Planning Components
18
• Desired Outcome: By 2019-2020, 54% of students will score proficient in ELA.
• Enabling Activity: Implement professional development and coaching to ensure teacher clarity within their standards-based instruction areas
• Lead: Curriculum Coordinator • Target Population: All Students • Funding: WSF
2014 ©ACS WASC
Sample of Planning Components
19
• Evidence of Progress: Monitored Quarterly: 100% of teachers will
participate in classroom observation protocols focusing on:
• visible learning targets • co-constructed rubrics/criteria • checklists • student goal setting • student reflections
2014 ©ACS WASC
Academic Plan Questions
2014 ©ACS WASC 20
How does the Leadership Team determine the desired outcomes for each strategy and other components?
How does the Leadership Team ensure the Academic Plan is aligned
with the prioritized growth areas identified by the Schoolwide Focus
Groups?
Action Plan
Criteria Strengths
Criteria Growth Areas Student
Learner Needs
Data
General Learner
Outcomes
Road to the Action Plan
ACSWASC © 2013 21
22 2014 ©ACS WASC
Let’s Practice
Examine the growth areas from all the focus groups. Group these growth areas into several strands or themes. Chart these.
Let’s Check
To what extent will the strategies of your updated Academic Plan show direct alignment with the student learner needs? the General Learner Outcomes? identified growth areas? what is already identified in the Academic Plan?
Realistically will the enabling activities within each strategy of the Academic Plan impact student achievement?
2014 ©ACS WASC 23
Once Action Plan areas are identified • How do staff members update the current Academic
Plan with meaningful and realistic steps? • How are teachers and other staff involved to gain
consensus and support of the action plan? • How do staff integrate other school projects, grants, and
plans? • How do staff ensure the plan will strengthen student
achievement?
2014 ©ACS WASC 24
Visualize what will be different for students…. One year from now? Two years
from now? Three years from now?
25 2014 ©ACS WASC
How do school staff monitor implementation and accomplishment of the Academic Plan?
Why?
How?
VC Schoolwide Critical Areas for Follow-Up
2014 ©ACS WASC 26
Support those areas already identified by the school in the Academic Plan
Strengthen those identified areas in the Academic Plan
Address additional areas identified by the Visiting Committee
Why
Chapter V: Self-Check Questions
2014 ©ACS WASC 27
2014 ©ACS WASC 28
Agenda
Chapter V: Action Plan
Chapters I-IV
Visit and Status
The Self-Study
So What? What currently exists?
How effective is it?
What? What is the ideal based upon…?
• Vision, Mission, General Learner Outcomes
• HIDOE/ACS WASC Criteria and Indicators
• Academic Standards
Now What? What and how will we modify?
What should be in the Academic Three Year Plan ?
Summary: Self-Study Process
ACS WASC/HIDOE Self Study, 2019-20
ACS WASC ©2018-19 31
Chapter I Progress Report
Chapter II Student-
Community Profile
Chapter III
Self-Study Findings
Chapter IV Summary list
of Major Student Learner Needs
Chapter V Plan
Preface
Electronic Appendices
Will the self-study be ready to be sent 6 weeks prior to visit?
Has the maximum time been allotted for home and focus group work—maximizing regular meeting time?
Timeline
ACSWASC © 2013 32
Doing the work
ACSWASC © 2013 33
Organization
34
Data Teams Grade-level clusters Groups (i.e. students, classified staff, parents)
2013©ACS-WASC
Gather information based on indicators and prompts
Share:
How have you organized your Focus Groups?
Scheduling Focus Group Work in terms of needed Home Group or departmental/data team gathering/discussions
Staggering the work ACSWASC © 2013 35
Task 1: Analyze and reflect upon the school’s progress and the impact on student learning since the previous full self-study.
Product: Chapter I: Summary of Progress
HIDOE/ACS WASC Tasks
Directions
37 2013©ACS-WASC
HIDOE/WASC FOL, pp. 33-34
Chapter I: Self-Check Questions
38 2013©ACS-WASC
Task 2 Chapter II
• Develop or Refine
Student/ Community Profile
• Clarify General Learner Outcomes
ACS WASC ©2016-17 39
Directions
40
HIDOE/WASC FOL, pp. 35-37
2013©ACS-WASC
Chapter II: Student/Community Profile
41
School Information/Programs Data and Findings
General Learner Outcomes Appendices
2013©ACS-WASC 2013©ACS-WASC
Chapter II: Data within Profile (pp. 39-41)
42
•Introduction (Na Hopena A’o)
•Demographic •Performance
•General Learner Outcomes •Professional Development
•Perception Data •Resources and Management
2013©ACS-WASC
43
What data should we include in our profile? Where do we obtain
the data? HIDOE/WASC FOL, pp. 39-41
2013©ACS-WASC
44
Findings from our data: What does the data tell us? (Using SSIR, ARCH, LDS,
Strive HI, etc.) 2013©ACS-WASC
45 ACS WASC ©2016-17
Sample Achievement Data Determine 2-3 findings. Any questions raised?
General Learner Outcomes
46
Global Interdisciplinary
All students Assessable
2013©ACS-WASC
HIDOE students will be…
Self-Directed Learners
Community Contributors
Complex Thinkers Quality Producers Effective Communicators Effective and Ethical Users of Technology
HIDOE/ACS WASC FOL, 2018, p. 4
General Learner Outcomes (GLOs)
Sample GLO Finding
During our self-study process we looked closely at student data on GLOs, student perceptions, and teacher expectations… After examination of our our data, we noticed that GLO #3 on Complex Thinker had the lowest number of students being rated usually or consistently and the highest rating of sometimes…we decided this would be one of our main areas of focus.
2014 ©ACS WASC 48
ACS WASC ©2015 49
Critiquing Chapter IV Activity: •Compare the profile to the Student/Community Profile Guide (FOL, pp. 39-41) •Are the appropriate data pieces included? Has the school commented upon all data?
Chapter I: Product Student/Community Profile (Task 2)
Data and Findings: trends, irregular patterns, and/or anomalies
• Demographic data, including refined GLOs and implementation of Na Hopena A’o
• Disaggregated and interpreted Student Outcome Data
• Perception data including survey summaries, if any • Draft Summary of Implications, 2-3 Student Learner
Needs and Questions for use in Focus Groups
Appendices 50 2013©ACS-WASC
Chapter II: Product Student/Community Profile (Task 2)
Procedure 3 (Page 36):
• What are the implications of the data with respect to student performance?
• Select 2-3 major preliminary student learner needs
• List important questions that have been raised by the analysis of student performance, demographic, and perception data.
51 2013©ACS-WASC
Sample Implications
52
• The ELL, SPED, Title I and Asian/Pacific Islander subgroups did not meet proficiency in reading and math.
• Even with the focus on the statewide benchmarks for standards, , there is a need to address problem-solving and critical thinking skills in reading and math.
2013©ACS-WASC
Sample Student Learning Needs
53
• Reading Comprehension Skills (academic texts, critical reading skills, and memory and retention skills)
• Math (problem-solving and operational skills) • Problem-solving and critical thinking
2013©ACS-WASC
Sample Questions for All Stakeholders
54
• How do all staff members address the issues of improving the reading, math and problem-solving and critical thinking skills within all courses and programs?
• How do all staff members address the greater use of multiple sources of data effectively to address the modification of the learning and teaching to improve students’ performance within different subgroups and grade levels?
2013©ACS-WASC
Chapter II: Product Student/Community Profile (Task 2)
Procedure 4 (Page 36):
• Discuss draft progress and profile reports with all stakeholders
• Determine if there is agreement at this time on the identified major preliminary student learning needs and important questions raised (Procedure 3). Are there any additions? How do these align to the Hawaii State Strategic Plan?
• Finalize Profile (procedure #1)/Summary (procedure #3)
55 2013©ACS-WASC
Who are the students? How are the students doing?
What does the data tell us? Not tell us?
• What questions does the data raise?
56 2013©ACS-WASC
Chapter II: Self-Check Questions
57 2013©ACS-WASC
Task 3: Evaluate the quality of the school program in relation to the HIDOE/ACS WASC criteria with emphasis on the identified student learning needs; synthesize the information; determine strengths and growth needs.
Product: Chapter III: Summary of findings for criteria in each category and supporting evidence. Identified strengths and prioritized growth areas.
HIDOE/ACS WASC Tasks
ACS WASC/HIDOE Criteria
ACSWASC © 2013 59
Chapter III: Self-Study Findings
Criteria/Indicator Findings Supporting Evidence
ACSWASC © 2013 60
ACSWASC © 2013 61
Task 3: Program Analysis ─ Chapter III
ACSWASC © 2013 62
Focus Groups • Review and discuss all 5 categories of criteria • Concentrate on assigned criteria and indicators • Use prompts
What data, information, and evidence are needed to determine what currently exists and its
effectiveness?
Task 3: Initial Procedures
63 2013©ACS-WASC
Task 3: Focus Groups
64
What currently exists?
How effective is this? The So What Question?
What data, information, and evidence do we need?
2013©ACS-WASC
Focus Group Dialogue: Sample Questions
What do we know already, including the supporting evidence? What is already in the profile? What evidence is needed from the home groups?
What particular evidence is needed from the home groups related to the identified student learner needs, e.g., how can we all support the English learners? Writing?
ACSWASC © 2013 65
Category C: Standards-based Student Learning: Instruction
C1. Instruction Criterion – Student Centered Instruction
Students actively participate and are highly engaged in their learning through challenging activities that support clearly articulated learning targets so all students achieve the academic standards and the General Learner Outcomes.
2018©ACS WASC
C1: Instruction: Student Access to Learning Sample Indicator and Prompt
67
Students’ Voice and Feedback C1.3 Indicator: The school’s instructional staff members use students’ voice and feedback in order to adjust instruction and learning experiences.
C1.3 Prompt: Evaluate the effectiveness of the use of students’ voice and feedback to adjust instruction and learning experiences. Provide examples.
Findings Supporting Evidence
2018©ACS WASC
C1. Instruction Criterion – Student Access to Learning Possible Areas to Examine and Analyze
•Classroom observations to determine the extent to which differentiation of instruction is occurring and its impact on student learning
•How instructional practices and other activities facilitate access and successful educational outcomes for students who are ELL, economically disadvantaged, underachieving, gifted and talented, at-risk, and in special education
HIDOE/ACS WASC FOL, 2018, p. 73
ACSWASC © 2013 68
ACS WASC/HIDOE Template (example) www.acswasc.org
C2. Instruction Criterion – Rigorous and Relevant Instruction All teachers provide students with a rigorous and relevant instructional program that includes differentiated instruction and engaging activities and assignments so students demonstrate creative and critical thinking, problem solving, and application
Current Knowledge C2.1. Indicator: Teachers are current in the instructional content
taught and research-based instructional methodology, including the integrated use of multimedia and technology.
C2.1. Prompt: Evaluate the extent to which teachers are current in the instructional content and effectively use multimedia and other technology in the delivery of the curriculum.
Findings Supporting Evidence
ACSWASC © 2013 69
ACS WASC/HIDOE Template (example) cont. Summary, Strengths, and Growth Areas
Review all the findings and supporting evidence and summarize the degree to which the criteria in Category C are being met.
Include comments about the degree to which these criteria impact the school’s ability to address one or more of the identified student learning needs from Task 2.
Summary (including comments about the preliminary student learner needs):
Prioritize the strengths and areas of growth for Category C.
Category C: Instruction: Areas of Strength Category C: Instruction: Areas of Growth Copy and paste the Areas of Strength and prioritized Areas of
Growth/Challenges into the matrix in Chapter IV.
ACSWASC © 2013 70
Task 3: Home/Focus Groups―ACS WASC/HIDOE Criteria
What are the criteria concepts?
Indicators/Prompts
What evidence is needed for analysis?
Gathering and Analyzing Data/Information by Home and Focus Groups
ACSWASC © 2013 71
72 ACS WASC ©2016-17
Activity: Category D: Instruction-Reviewing Sample Indicators in D1 or D2
• What does the indicator mean?
• Brainstorm types of evidence that might be used for this indicator?
Jigsaw Learning: Expert Group
73 ACS WASC ©2016-17
Jigsaw: Cooperative Group
Share what your indicator means and what evidence your group considered Others might add on ideas and/or clarify meaning
74 ACS WASC ©2016-17
Thank Group and Return to Table
Share new learnings or
insights
75 ACS WASC ©2016-17
Sample Conversation Prompts…
• What patterns and trends do we find in our learnings from our practice of unpacking an indicator?
• What are the key findings that impact student learning?
• What are our reflections?
• What might we consider designing for the future?
• What do we do now?
Includes analyzing:
What the students are doing and producing
Student interviews
Other interviews, observations, etc.
Observable Evidence
ACSWASC © 2013 76
Student Work “The process of looking at
student work in a collaborative manner helps teachers take a closer look
at how they teach.” Blythe, Allen, and Powell, Looking Together at Student Work: A Companion Guide to Assessing Student Learning. New York, Teachers College Press, 2007.
Nature Quality
Frequency Growth over time
ACSWASC © 2013 77
Student Work: Probing Questions
What did you notice as you examined this work?
What evidence do you see of students' research skills here? Of the application of math skills? Of critical thinking?
How can we support students to become reflective problem solvers?
What are the learning benefits of writing in math?
How was…different from…?
ACSWASC © 2013 78
Student Work: Resources
Essential Schools: Looking Collaboratively at Student Work
www.essentialschools.org/ resources/60
Looking at Student Work
www.lasw.org/
ACSWASC © 2013 79
Evidence: Examining Student Work
Examples of types of work (especially related to student learner needs):
• Typical work, such as writing or solving math problems • Projects, such as senior project • Research Paper • Same performance tasks
or assignments • Portfolios • Case studies
ACSWASC © 2013 80
Individually… • review student work samples.
• sort work into high, middle, low levels of performance.
As a group discuss… • the characteristics of the three categories
• how to ensure student work is representative of the school’s various subgroups
• the extent to which the results of this learning opportunity demonstrate the desired performance quality of the selected standards and General Learner Outcomes.
Sample : Examining Student Work Individually…
• review student work samples.
• sort work into high, middle, low levels of performance.
As a group discuss…
• the characteristics of the three categories
• how to ensure student work is representative of the school’s various subgroups
• the extent to which the results of this learning opportunity demonstrate the desired performance quality of the selected standards and General Learner Outcomes.
ACSWASC © 2013 81
ACSWASC © 2013 82
What’s our purpose in looking at this student work.
What was the task designed to assess? How effective is it?
What are patterns or trends across the samples?
What are the misunderstandings and understandings?
What are implications for instruction and curriculum?
ACSWASC © 2013 83
Learning from student work
How often do students do this kind of work?
How does this work inform us about students’ abilities to be successful in reaching our General Learner Outcomes?
How will this work be evaluated?
What preceded this work? What will come next?
ACSWASC © 2013 84
How well the student understands the topic of the assignment?
The student’s mastery of a learning standard?
The student’s competence in our critical learner need? Our own grading standards?
Our next steps: press on, reteach, circle back later….?
Observations
Strategies Data-in-a-Day Roving teacher substitutes Teacher journals Shadowing students
Ground rules Capturing data
ACSWASC © 2013 85
Learning Snapshot
What are the students doing ? ___ listening ____ calculating ___ working in a group ___ watching ____ taking notes ___ working alone ___ writing ____ completing worksheet ___ reading ____ using technology Which student learner needs were observed? ___ reading ____critical thinking ___ writing ____computing What General Learner Outcomes were observed?
___ Citizen ___ Life/Career ___ Leadership
ACSWASC © 2013 86
How can your school implement staff observations as a regular practice?
What ground rules will ensure a “safe” environment and obtain staff buy-in?
What kind of “cue sheet” will the school develop?
How will the observation results be used in the FOL process?
Questions to answer about observing…
Interviews and Surveys Interviews
• Student to student • Family to family • Teacher to teacher
Surveys • Short
• Focused
• Understandable
ACSWASC © 2013 88
1) Individually, generate a few sample student questions.
2) Find a partner and share these questions. 3) Debrief, for example
• Open-ended questions • Non-biased • Concrete • Simple language
Evidence:
Interviewing
Share: One important point about evidence is…. Another important point to remember is ... Something that is still not clear to me is ...
90 ACS WASC ©2016-17
Task 3: Program Analysis ― Chapter III
Schoolwide Focus Groups
Home Groups ACSWASC © 2013 91
WRITING ANALYTICAL FINDINGS ACS WASC/HIDOE Focus on Learning
92 ACS WASC ©2016-17
• Assessment and Accountability
Sample Finding: Basis for Determination of Performance Levels Teachers at each grade level have worked hard to establish reasonable guidelines for all assessments to ensure that all students are graded on the same criteria. These, however, are not correlated among the grades. We have, however, not seen any substantial differences in students’ performance as they move to the next higher grade level. Little attention has been given to congruence among subject areas – thus we have observed that some students receive high grades in English/Language Arts and low grades in Social Studies. Fewer discrepancies are seen between Mathematics and Science grades. Fifth and sixth grade teachers have begun initial work in calibrating their grading systems. The overall plan is to continue this work throughout the other grades. Our self-study work revealed this weakness of which we were unaware.
Individually… • review student work samples.
• sort work into high, middle, low levels of performance.
As a group discuss… • the characteristics of the three categories
• how to ensure student work is representative of the school’s various subgroups
• the extent to which the results of this learning opportunity demonstrate the desired performance quality of the selected standards and General Learner Outcomes.
Activity 1A Individually…
• Read the Focus Group narrative in response to the prompt.
As a group discuss…
• What did the school find in response to the prompt?
• “To what degree” did the school address the prompt?
• How “effective” was the school’s practices/strategies/programs for this prompt?
As a whole group debrief…
ACSWASC © 2013 94
Individually… • review student work samples.
• sort work into high, middle, low levels of performance.
As a group discuss… • the characteristics of the three categories
• how to ensure student work is representative of the school’s various subgroups
• the extent to which the results of this learning opportunity demonstrate the desired performance quality of the selected standards and General Learner Outcomes.
Activity 1B Individually…
• Now read the second Focus Group narrative in response to the same prompt.
As a group discuss…
• What did the school find in response to the prompt?
• “To what degree” did the school address the prompt?
• How “effective” was the schools practices/strategies/programs for this prompt?
• How was this narrative sample different from the previous sample?
As a whole group debrief…
ACSWASC © 2013 95
ACSWASC © 2013 96
What’s our purpose in looking at the two samples of a Focus Group narrative?
What are implications for how Focus Groups respond to the indicators/ prompts?
Discuss the other sample narratives provided.
Ask when drafting responses to the indicators and prompts:
•Do the findings respond to what is being asked by the indicators/prompts? •Do the findings identify the degree and/or effectiveness of the school’s practices/ strategies/programs described for desired outcomes?
Key Questions
• Is what we found effective?
• Is it making a difference for students?
• Are our findings supported by evidence?
EVALUATE! EVALUATE! EVALUATE!
ACSWASC © 2013 97
Critiquing Chapter III
Criteria Findings
Supporting Evidence
How effective?
Chapter III: Self-Study Findings
ACS WASC ©2018-19
How do we know?
Was the analysis of the school program done in relation to the accomplishment of the student learner needs, the General Learner Outcomes, academic standards, and the criteria concepts?
Was the accuracy of the findings discussed and supported by evidence?
ACSWASC © 2013 99
Critiquing Chapter III
Did discussion occur about how the findings relate to supporting the learning needs of all students?
Were evaluative responses provided for all the criteria/indicators/prompts with supporting evidence? (How effective? What has been the impact on student learning?)
Are strengths and prioritized areas for growth reasonable based on the aligned findings and evidence?
ACSWASC © 2013 100
Plan and re-plan the work of Home and Focus Groups
ACSWASC © 2013 101
Schoolwide Focus Groups
What are their characteristics? What are their responsibilities?
ACSWASC © 2013 102
Self-Check Questions
ACSWASC © 2013 103
Task 4: Summarize the identified student learning needs based on profile and Focus Group analysis and findings.
Product: Chapter IV: Summary of identified student learner needs Table of identified schoolwide strengths and growth areas/challenges
HIDOE/ACS WASC Tasks
105
Review strengths and growth areas from the five criteria categories
Use these to identify major themes or strands
that can help in confirming the major student learner needs
Confirm identified/revised
major student learner needs
ACS WASC ©2018-19
2014 ©ACS WASC 106
Agenda
Chapter V: Action Plan
Chapters I-IV
Visit and Status
Chairperson/Coach
2014 ©ACS WASC 107
VC Committee Members
2014 ©ACS WASC 108
Preparing for the Visit
Remembering
Planning
Students
Staff
Technology Evidence
Schedule
2014 ©ACS WASC 109
Staff
Hosting
Visit: Preparation and Follow-up
• School must send the self-study report 6 weeks prior to
visit to all. • School sends self-study report electronically to Visiting
Committee (VC) chair/members • School sends to ACS WASC using the Document Upload
link on the top of the navigation bar of the ACS WASC website: www.acswasc.org/document-upload/
2014 ©ACS WASC 110
Visit: Preparation and Follow-up
• School shares drafts and collaboratively develops schedule with VC chair
• VC chair works with principal and self-study coordinator(s) on details such as work room needs, meeting room, technical support, logistics, etc. (Separate communication to principal on lodging arrangements, if applicable)
• After visit, school sends updated Academic Plan to ACS WASC through document upload on website
2014 ©ACS WASC 111
Schedule/Activities (3 ½ days for middle and high schools, 3 ½ days for elementary schools)
2014 ©ACS WASC 112
Daily feedback meetings between Visiting Committee members and school leaders
Classroom/campus observations
Informal interviews
Meetings with Focus Groups and others
Daily meeting of VC Chair and principal
VC report editing/reviewing
VC Report
Analysis Conclusions-Action Plan Schoolwide strengths Schoolwide critical areas for follow-up Support identified areas Strengthen identified areas Address additional areas
2014 ©ACS WASC 113
What are the critical elements that will enable your school to focus on the analysis of student
achievement?
ACSWASC © 2013 114
W A S C
We
Are
Student
Centered
ACSWASC © 2013 115