HFM High Field Model, EuCARD WP7 meeting, 18/03/2010, Pierre Manil, 1/20 EuCARD-WP7-HFM MPWG Bending...
-
Upload
rudolph-wilkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of HFM High Field Model, EuCARD WP7 meeting, 18/03/2010, Pierre Manil, 1/20 EuCARD-WP7-HFM MPWG Bending...
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
1/2
0
EuCARD-WP7-HFMMPWG
Bending Test
Pierre MANILCEA/iRFU/SIS
March 18, 2010 at Wroclaw
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
2/2
0
Ackowledgement
• Thanks to the task and working group members. Especially:
► @ CERN:Attilio Milanese, Juan Carlos Perez, Gijs de Rijk, Ezio Todesco
► @ Saclay:Mélanie Bruchon, Maria Durante, François Kircher, Jean-Michel Rifflet, Etienne Rochepault, Françoise Rondeaux
► Tooling specification: MPWG
► Theoretical analysis: Attilio Milanese (CERN)
► Draftsman: Jean-François Millot (CEA)
► Fabrication: CERN workshop, followed by Juan Carlos Perez (CERN)
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
3/2
0
MPWG Activities
WP7: HFMGijs de Rijk (CERN)
7.3: High Field ModelJean-Michel Rifflet (CEA)
Specification WG Ezio Todesco (CERN)
EuCARD
Magnet Pre-design WG myself (CEA)
Cable Design WG Luc Oberli (CERN)
7.2: Support StudiesJaroslaw Polinski (WUT)
7.4: HTc insertPascal Tixador (Grenoble)
13 T magnet, so-called ‘Fresca 2’ HTc insert
• Preliminary models• Preliminary tests• Configuration choice• Optimization• Model realization• Realization
other tasks
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
4/2
0
MPWG Activities
Magnet Pre-design Workin Group
► Collaborative work between CERN and CEA» cf. talk from Jean-Michel at the beginning of the session
► First task is to discriminate between two options: “ Block vs. Cos(θ)”» cf. talk from Attilio, just before» Magnetic comparison => first analysis done» Mechanical comparison => on-going (CAST3M, ANSYS)» Feasibility
– Winding => 1st step = Bending Test, next week (this talk)– Pre-stress– …
» Configuration choice by April 2010 (DWG)» Magnetic Optimization » Mechanical optimization » Trials» In parallel: characterization tests
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
5/2
0
Bending Test: Goal
• We know by experience that if the Cos(θ) design is selected, we can manage with the ends
• What about the Block design ends?
Φ100 mm Pre-stress
The Bending Test considers only the Block configuration!
Flat racetracks
Block 2
Block 1
Block 4
Block 3
Flared endslike for HD2 [1]
sketch: A. Milanesepicture from HD2, courtesy of LBNL
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
6/2
0
Bending Test: Historical approach
• In the 80’s,the HERA magnet experienced a Block design at Saclay [2]
Stacking similar to a Block
Stacking similar to a Cos(Θ)
Sol. A
Sol. B
courtesy of J.M. Rifflet
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
7/2
0
Bending Test: Zones
• The baseline coil geometry divides into 3 or 4 zones:
► straight section (SS) parallel to the mid-plane of the magnet► hard-way bend zone (HW) in a plane containing the cable► optional straight section (OS) part on an inclined plane► easy-way bend zone (EW) on an inclined plane
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
8/2
0
Bending Test: Mockup
• Cardboard mockup illustrating the zones:
End (flat)
Hard-way bend zone (planar)
Straight section
Φ120 mmclear bore(including
mechanics)
Minimal radius(> 10.tcable)~220 mm
BLOCK 2
Block 1Block 2
courtesy of Attilio Milanese
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
9/2
0
Bending Test: Ideas dor the ends
• “Side”: double clothoid + flat part• Flat “racetrack” end
2 layers of cableFlat end
courtesy of Attilio Milanese
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
10/
20
End shape: Analytical approach
• Analytic study by Attilio to identify ‘best’ end configurations [3]
► Ideal beam is assumed► Good solution must:
» Not be too long» Be smooth up to second derivative» Be convex» Minimize the total strain energy» Avoid peaks of strain energy
► 5 geometries are compared:
φ120 circle
ellipse
superellipse
least energy
clothoid
courtesy of Attilio Milanese
Curvature k(x)
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
11/
20 • 3 geometries are selected for the Bending Test:
• The best one will be kept for the FRESCA2 magnet
End shape: Selected options
circle ellipse superellipse
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
12/
20
Bending Test Parameters (1/3)
Remarks:• HFM dummy cable is used (see sample)• The first dummy cable has a p of ~120 mm (Luc Oberli, 02/10) (mechanical instabilities with p > 140 mm)• No insulation for the first test campaign (bare dummy cable)
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
13/
20
Bending Test Parameters (2/3)
sketch: A. Milanese
Y2
Remarks:• wp includes Φb + 20 mm for mechanics• Block 2 is considered (minimal radius)• Nt corresponds to ~1/4 Block• Y2 corresponds to the lowest possible position for the Block 2
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
14/
20
Bending Test Parameters (3/3)
The Bending Tooling will allow to try many different configurations,with several degrees of freedom for each zone
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
15/
20
Tooling
• Specified by the MPWG from Jaunary on• Detailed design by Saclay (February)• Fabricated last week at CERN• Delivered at Saclay today (18/3)!
with J.F. Millot
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
16/
20 LHW = 160
Tooling d.o.f
values in mm.with J.F. Millot
LSS = 32080
Y2 = 21.8
r W =
120
L OS = 0 / 20 / 50
rb = 50Θ
Return end Φ121.82
end (3 options)
0/5/10/15/20/25°
The full configurationcorresponds toapprox. 2 m / turns
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
17/
20
Example: flat configuration
with J.F. Millot
The flat configurationcorresponds toapprox. 1.5 m / turns
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
18/
20
Experimental Design
# LSS
(mm)LHW
(mm)LOS
(mm)Θ(°)
End type HWtemplate
Nt CableLength Lc
Flat test 320 0 0 0 circle / 2 3 m
Flat end test 320 0 0 0 others / 2 6 m
Ramp test #1 320 160 50 25 best No 2 4 m
(Ramp test #N) 320 160 50 … best No 2 16 m
OS test 320 160 0 / 20 best best No 2 8 m
Optimal config’ 320 160 best best best No 10 20 m
HW shape test 320 80 / 160 best best best Yes 2 8 m
Insulated test 320 best best best best best 10 20 m
CABLE NEED ~90 m
Additional parameters:• winding tension (~50 kN with gradual decrease)• transposition pitch
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
19/
20
Next Steps
► Bending Test: next week at Saclay
► MPWG Meeting 06:Friday next week (26/3) at Saclay => Test conclusions
► Configuration choice: by April
► Mechanical modeling
► Magnetic optimization
► Mechanical characterization of the conductor:» Young modulus at RT & 2K» Thermal coefficient» Ultimate compressive stress (critical current)
HFM
Hig
h Fi
eld
Mod
el, E
uCAR
D W
P7 m
eetin
g, 1
8/03
/201
0, P
ierr
e M
anil,
20/
20
References
[1] Recent test results of the High Field Nb3Sn dipole magnet HD2P. Ferracin, B. Bingham, S. Caspi, D. W. Cheng, D. R. Dietderich, H. Felice, A. R. Hafalia, C. R. Hannaford, J. Joseph, A. F. Lietzke, J. Lizarazo, G. Sabbi, X. WangSubmitted to MT21, Hefei, Oct. 2009
[2] The HERA dipole magnet:J. Pérot, J.-M. RiffletRef
[3] Shapes of coil ends in racetrack layout for superconducting magnetsA. MilaneseCERN TE-Note-2010-04, Jan. 2010, EDMS 1057916
[4] FRESCA2 magnet specificationSWGversion 2.0, Feb. 2010, accessible on the Task 7.3 workspace
+ Previous talks this day