Heterogeneous photocatalytic reduction of NO in the presence of conjugated polymers
-
Upload
zoltan-toth -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of Heterogeneous photocatalytic reduction of NO in the presence of conjugated polymers
Jointly published by
Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam
and Akad@miai Kiad6, Budapest
React.Kinet. Catal.Lett.,
Vol. 56, No. i, 185-189
(1995) .
RKCL2670
HETEROGENEOUS PHOTOCATALYTIC REDUCTION OF NO IN THE PRESENCE OF
CONJUGATED POLYMERS
Zolt~n T6th, P@ter P@nzeli and Enik6 P6s~n
Institute of Physical Chemistry, Kossuth Lajos University,
H-4010 Debrecen, Hungary
Received February 6, 1995 Accepted May 22, 1995
The reaction of NO with NH 3 is photocatalytic in the
presence of ~oly(p-phenylene), polythiocyanogen and
Ti02, and leads to high N2/N20 ratios. The reduction
of NO in the presence of Cu-containing paracyanogen or
Cu is not a photocatalytic reaction, and yields
relatively low N2/N20 ratios.
INTRODUCTION
The catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxide (NO) is very
important from the standpoint of removal of air pollutants.
Different metals (Pt, Cu), metal ion-exchanged zeolites, and
metal-oxides (CuO, Cr203 , Fe203 ) are the most effective
catalysts for the heterogeneous reduction of NO. In this paper,
we present the results of our studies on the photoreduction of
NO in the presence of conjugated polymers. Among ~-bonded
0133-1736/95/US$ 9.90. �9 Akad~miai Kiad6, Budapest.
All rights reserved.
TOTH et al.: PHOTOCATALYTIC REDUCTION
conjugated polymers, polycyanogens (PC), polythiocyanogens
(PTC), and poly(p-phenylene)s (PPP) show remarkable
photocatalytic activity in the photoreduction of water [1-3],
carbon dioxide [4], carbonyl compounds [2], methyl-viologen
[3,5], and in the photoisomerization of olefins [2] in the
presence of sacrificial electron donors (e.g. EDTA, TEA, TEOA)
under UV (or VIS) light.
EXPERIMENTAL
NO gas was prepared from NaN02 and KI with H2SO 4 [6]. A
glass flask (120 cm 3, transparent for k > 305 nm light)
containing the solid photocatalyst, was filled with oxygen-free
NO, then i0 cm 3 of NH 3 solution was injected through a silicon
rubber septum. The reaction mixture was stirred at 30-40 ~
under unthermostated conditions. The N0-content of the gas
phase was determined spectrophotometrically as FeN02+ complex
(k = 450 nm), formed in the solution of Fe(NH4)2(S04)2 on the
action of 0.25 cm 3 of N0-containing sample. The relative
amount of the N 2 and N20 formed was determined mass-
spectrometrically (QGA-2, ATOMKI). A 150 W tungsten filament
spot lamp (PAR-38, TUNGSRAM) with 15 cm water-filter, and a 400
W quartz lamp (HgOK-400, TUNGSRAM, with intensive emission
lines at 310, 360 and 365 nm) served as light sources for VIS,
and UV irradiation, respectively. The preparation of the
conjugated polymers tested has been described earlier [3].
TiO 2 (Degussa P 25) a well-known photocatalyst (which has not
been investigated in NO photoreduction till now) was the
reference material. The sacrificial electron donors (NH 3-
solution, ascorbic acid, n-butyl-amine) were used without
further purification.
186
TOTH et al.: PHOTOCATALYTIC REDUCTION
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Data in Table 1 show that poly(p-phenylene), PPP, iodine-
poor polythiocyanogen: (SCNI0.04) n, PTC, and Ti02 catalyze the
photoconversion of NO in the presence of NH 3. The rate of NO
photoconversion depends on the amount of the catalyst, the
energy and intensity of light, and the concentration of NH 3
solution (Fig. i) . (Note, that the photocatalytic reaction was
observed in the presence of n-butyl-amine or ascorbic acid,
too, but no reaction takes place in the absence of an electron
donor.)
Table 1
Conversion of NO after 2 h in the presence of different
photocatalysts(25 % NH3-solution, distance of light source: UV
52 cm, VIS 44 cm)
Catalyst Amount UV light VIS light in dark
PPP 5 mg ii %
i0 mg 34 % 29 % 2 %
20 mg 36 %
PTC 5 mg 24 %
i0 mg 29 % 19 %a 28 % 14 %b 5 %
20 mg 41%
PC-Cu i0 mg 53 % 59 % 60 %
Cu I0 mg 55 % 42 % 55 %
TiO 2 i0 mg 28 % 17 % 0 %
a b irradiation from a greater distance
We did not observe any photocatalytic activity of
paracyanogens, (CN)n, in the above reaction system. Mercury or
silver containing paracyanogens did not catalyze the NO
reduction, and the measured catalytic activity of the copper-
containig (87 wt.%) paracyanogen, PC-Cu, was the same as that
of the well-known Cu powder catalyst.
187
TOTH et al.: PHOTOCATALYTIC REDUCTION
The difference between the two types of catalytic behavior
was explored not only by effect of irradiation, but by MS
investigating the relative amount of the two main reaction
products: N 2 and N20. The N2/N20 ratio was more than ten times
greater in the case of PPP, PTC and Ti02, (42, 2.2 and 1.9,
respectively) than in the case of PC-Cu (0.i) . These
observations can be explained by the well-known mechanism for
the heterogeneous catalytic dark reduction of NO with NH 3 [7].
The first steps are the associative adsorption of NO:
NO -+ N0ad s
and the dissociative adsorption of NH3:
NH 3 -+ NH2,ad s + Had s
The reaction of adsorbed NO with adsorbed NH 2 leads to the
formation of N2:
NOads + NH2, ads -+ N2, ads + H2Oads
and the reaction between adsorbed NO and adsorbed H yields
N20:
2NOad s + 2Had s -+ N2Oad s + H2Oad s
The photocatalysts may prefer the formation of N 2 to N20 by
the oxidation of adsorbed NH 3 with photogenerated holes:
NH3,ad s + h + -~ NH2,ad s + H+ad s
However, this speculation needs further experimental
evidence.
Acknowledgement. We are grateful to the Hungarian
Scientific Research Foundation for financial support (0TKA
Grant 1695/91. to Z.T6th), and to Dr. L~szl6 D6zsa for the MS
measurements.
188
TOTH et al.: PHOTOCATALYTIC REDUCTION
100 ~ m �9 ,u �9
I I k ~ ~ o - �9 •
-~ 80
N g O
Reect ion t i m e / h
Fig. i. Effect of ammonia concentration on the
photoreduction of NO catalyzed by PTC under UV
light
[] 25% ammonia A 20% ammonia
�9 12.5% ammonia �9 5% ammonia �9 0% ammonia
REFERENCES
i. S. Yanagida, A. Kabumoto, K. Mizumoto, C. Pac,
K. Yoshino: J. C. S. Chem. Commun., 474 (1985).
2. T. Shibata, A. Kabumoto, T. Shiragami, O. Ishitani,
C. Pac, S. Yanagida: J. Phys. Chem., 94, 2068 (1990).
3. Z. T6th, Zs. Zs6t@r, M.T. Beck: React. Kinet. Catal. Lett.,
47, 29 (1992).
189
TOTH et al.: PHOTOCATALYTIC REDUCTION
4. S. Matsuoka, T. Kohzuki, C. Pac, S. Yanagida:
Chem. Lett., 2047 (1990).
5. Z. T6th, M. Okr6s, M.T. Beck: Inorg. Chim. Acta, 143, 9
(1988) .
6. L. Moser: Z. Anal. Chem., 50, 406 (1911).
7. W.B. Williamson, J.H. Lunsford: J. Phys. Chem., 80, 2664
(1976) .
190