Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat

71

description

This is a judgement between Heritage Oil Uganda and Uganda Revenue Authority (TAT No. 20/2010) the case arises from URA's assessment of US $404,950,000 in taxes following Heritage Oil's Sale of their interest to Tullow Oil Uganda. the sale of interest was calculated at US $ 1.35Billion. This case is part of the serries of cases between Govt. of Uganda and Oil Companies including the Heritage Oil Vs Tullow Oil in London and the Tullow Oil Vs Govt of Uganda before UNICITRAL in London. Note that Heritage Oil has appealed this decision

Transcript of Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat

Page 1: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 2: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 3: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 4: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 5: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 6: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 7: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 8: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 9: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 10: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 11: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 12: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 13: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 14: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 15: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 16: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 17: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 18: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 19: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 20: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 21: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 22: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 23: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 24: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 25: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 26: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 27: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 28: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 29: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 30: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 31: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 32: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 33: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 34: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 35: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 36: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 37: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 38: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 39: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 40: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 41: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 42: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 43: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 44: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 45: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 46: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 47: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 48: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 49: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 50: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 51: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 52: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 53: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 54: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 55: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 56: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 57: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 58: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 59: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 60: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 61: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 62: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 63: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 64: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 65: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 66: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 67: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 68: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 69: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 70: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat
Page 71: Heritage vs Ura Ruling- Tat