Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory Professor of Entrepreneurship

30
Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory Professor of Entrepreneurship Being in the Right Place: Communities and Organizations

description

Being in the Right Place: Communities and Organizations. Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory Professor of Entrepreneurship. Overall Agenda. Firm and Community The community as a node connecting information flows The community as a birthplace of firms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory Professor of Entrepreneurship

Page 1: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Henrich R. GreveINSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory Professor of Entrepreneurship

Being in the Right Place: Communities and Organizations

Page 2: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Overall Agenda

•Firm and Community

• The community as a node connecting information flows

• The community as a birthplace of firms

• The community as a supporting structure for firms

Page 3: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Node Connecting Information Flows

• Industrial cluster model

• Each industry involves a set of information flows useful for founders and those operating firm

• Suppliers similarly involve information flows• Communities with the greatest intersection of these

information flows become clusters with competitive advantage

• Is this old-fashioned? Is it contrary to smooth information flow assumptions in some of our theoretical views, like resource based view?

Page 4: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Figure 2a: Post-panamax Container Ship Adoption

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

jan.87 okt.89 jul.92 apr.95 jan.98 okt.00 jun.03

Date

Pro

port

ion

Page 5: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

A hard-to-find innovation?

Post-Panamax Container Carrier: Not a subtle way to save 30+ % of total unit costs per journey

Page 6: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Container Network 1994

China

Dalian

Roland

Fincant

Hanjin

Howaldt

Hudong

101

Hyundai

IHI

Sietas

Kawasaki

KoyoMHI

OdenseSamsung

Teraoka

Teraoka

Kvarner

Mitsui

104

106

109

112

115

118

121123

124

127

131

Evergreen

136

141143

American

152

16

161

173

178

182

184

Hanjin

199

200

202

206

213

214

218

Hyundai

222

226

229

231

232

233235

236

J ahre

239

24

245

251

260

262

264

265

27

278

279

28

288

290

292

293

294

299304

308

315

318

319

MISC

322

323

Moller

333

338

Neptune

348

35

355

36

361

365

366

371

378

379

382

OOCL

387

388

389

391397

401

403

407

41

416

417

426

428

43

432

438

44

442

443

444

446

451

453

456

458

460

466

50

51

514

518 530

534

540

558

564

566

572

574582588

60

603

605

606

607

609

612

613

620

621

622

623

626

627

628

632

636

638

64

640

642

643

647649

65

651

657

66

665

Zodiac

67

68

69

71

73

74

75

76

82

Cosco

84

8694

97

Page 7: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Overall Agenda

•Firm and Community

• The community as a node connecting information flows

• The community as a birthplace of firms

• The community as a supporting structure for firms

Page 8: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Birthplace of Organizations

• Start with observations on community organization:

• Santa Clara, CA the resort town versus Ventura, CA the oil town (but both had oil)• Molotch et al AJS 2000: Community organizations “harbor memory

traces … through something like a social structure can transpose itself from one time to the next and one institutional realm to the next”

• Northern Italy versus Southern Italy• Putnam et al. 1993: “one could have predicted the success or failure of

regional government in Italy in the 1980’s with extraordinary accuracy from patterns of civic engagement nearly a century earlier”

Page 9: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Community Organizing Capability?

• Early organizational founding leaves traces:

• Exemplar organizations• Network of individuals trained in founding and running

them• Cultural elements (stories, justifications)

• Polya urn: Subsequent foundings draw on the same background

• More nodes in network• Tighter connections between network• Stronger cultural background

• But only in communities with early start – so divergence

Page 10: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Mutual Organizations in Norway, 19th and 20th century

Savings bank foundings Cooperative foundings

Page 11: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Some Evidence: Financial Mutuals Create Retail Coops, 50+ Years LaterRegression of Cooperative foundingEarly Founding:

Village Fire Insurers 0.096**

Savings Banks 0.174**

Insurers 0.039

Average Treatment EffectsYear Coefficient

1915 0.372***

1925 0.490***

1935 0.484***

1945 0.524***

1955 0.532***

Page 12: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

The Extension: Commercial Firms

• Is there a generalized founding capability in communities?

• If so, it should be shown by foundings having spillovers across forms of organizations, rather than within

• Argument has been made based on general institutional conditions:

• North (1990), Putnam et al (1993), Krugman (1991) • Argument has been made in negative direction:

• Acemoglu et al. (2002) on disease, Kitchelt and Bustokova (2009) on clientele states, Kuran (2011) on corporate role in law

• Our argument is specifically organizational

Page 13: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Overall Agenda

•Firm and Community

• The community as a node connecting information flows

• The community as a birthplace of firms

• The community as a supporting structure for firms

Page 14: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Supporting Structure for Firms

• Close link of trust between firm and customers often overlooked; easier to notice when it is broken

• Earlier work on stigmatization showed how it can unravel and create a crisis when firm breaks community norms

• Jonsson, Greve, Fujiwara-Greve ASQ 2009: Skandia insurance firm broke community norms by giving relatives of managers cheap apartments to rent --> Loss of customers in mutual funds owned by other insurance firms, as well as other firms with characteristics resembling Skandia.

• Fujiwara-Greve et al.: Skandia also suffered significant losses from scandal; was sold in the end.

Page 15: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Bank runs don’t happen anymore

Greece 2011

Page 16: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Bank runs don’t happen anymore

Korea 2011

Page 17: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Bank Runs and Communities

• Bank runs are contagious: often occur as a reaction to bank runs elsewhere

• Empirics: Most banks do not experience runs; runs are not predicted by bank characteristics

• So look outside bank, to community:

• Demographically diverse communities lack internal networks that drive spread of the “problem” – safer

• Economically unequal communities have spread of problem plus distrust in others - riskier

Page 18: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Sources of fragmentation, 1893 USA

• Heavily agrarian especially in Mid-West and West, much immigration

• Race • Religion• Wealth inequality

• These are community characteristics “outside” organization; cannot easily select away

• Religion especially important because of congregation and communication / networks

Page 19: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship
Page 20: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship
Page 21: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship
Page 22: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship
Page 23: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship
Page 24: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship
Page 25: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship
Page 26: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship
Page 27: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship
Page 28: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

Some Evidence: Communities Turn on Banks

Variable All runs

Runs to failure

Runs to reopen

Ethnic Diversity -6.690*** -5.775** -5.775**

Religious Diversity -1.337* -1.023† -2.498**

Wealth Inequality 2.962*** 1.931* 3.598**

Page 29: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

The Extension: Exit, Voice, Loyalty

• We have heard this before: Hirschman

• Two modern updates:

• Take seriously the structure of the community side: how are they linked in the communication side, and the mobilization structures? See them as potential social movements, for or against.

• Take seriously the structure of the firm side: how are they linked in stigmatization structures? Who will be blamed when something happens? See them as linked subjects of social control agents.

Page 30: Henrich R. Greve INSEAD Chair of Organization and Management Theory  Professor of Entrepreneurship

The Big Picture: Firms in Linked Communities