Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

66
Echocardiography Primer for Intensivists Bucharest 2014

Transcript of Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Page 1: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Echocardiography Primer

for Intensivists

Bucharest 2014

Page 2: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

But first…

A Glimpse of Hemodynamics

Page 3: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts
Page 4: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

“New” conceptual approach?

Currently, BF and vT can be effectively assessed at the bedside Quantitative measures of capillary leak (vB) would be useful in guiding fluid therapy The objective measures for vC are cumbersome Bedside measures of vC are not yet available

Page 5: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

REDUCTIONIST DIDACTICISM

Page 6: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

How close are we of anything?

SVR - centered view

Critical closing pressure - centered view

Dynamic tone assess-

ment

Radioiodinated albumin

- DAXOR

Hb – dilution technique

MSFP–centered approach

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

PICCO

VIGILEO

SWAN

Biomarker panel

Radioiodinated albumin - DAXOR

EVLWi/PVPI - PICCO

NIRS

OPS/SDF SL tonometry

NADH fluorescence

Delayed fluorescence

mitoPO2

Miscellaneous

Page 7: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Paradigms have been shifting for some

time now…

Page 8: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

SHIFTING THE PARADIGM -flow centered era-

Page 9: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

SHIFTING THE PARADIGM -flow centered era-

α

β

Page 10: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

SHIFTING THE PARADIGM -flow centered era-

Page 11: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

SHIFTING THE PARADIGM -flow centered era-

TONE SDF

OPS

Page 12: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

SHIFTING THE PARADIGM -flow centered era-

“EFFECTS OF PERFUSION PRESSURE ON TISSUE PERFUSION IN SEPTIS SHOCK”

Page 13: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

SHIFTING THE PARADIGM -flow centered era-

The effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory alterations in patients

with septic shock are independent of its systemic effects

Page 14: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

SHIFTING THE PARADIGM -flow centered era-

Page 15: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

SHIFTING THE PARADIGM -flow centered era-

NITROGLYCERIN ?

Page 16: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

SHIFTING THE PARADIGM -flow centered era-

NITROGLYCERIN ?

Page 17: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

μVESSELS TONE

SHIFTING THE PARADIGM -flow centered era-

FLOW

Page 18: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

SHIFTING THE PARADIGM -μvessels centered era-

RECRUIT THE μCIRCULATION AND KEEP IT OPEN

Page 19: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

“Run the circulation at the lowest possible pressures?” -flow centered ideas-

Page 20: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Monitoring the right vessels

μvessels

FLOW

MAP TONE

Page 21: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

MAP

μvessels

FLOW

Page 22: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

The Break-up

Page 23: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Open up the μcirculation and keep it open -resuscitation-

Page 24: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

De-stress the distressed heart -contextual innuendo-

Page 25: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

SIADH

CRITICALLY ILL CM

IMMUNO SUPR.

POST CA SYNDROME

SIRS/ALI ARDS CATECHOL

ADM.

PHEOCHR.

CSW/RSW RENAL STUNNING

SAH

HYPER CATAB.

SEPSIS

TBI

Takotsubo -like CM

DISTRESS

TL

R

RAAS

PAMP/DAMP

SU

RG

E

βblockers

Alpha7n

AChR

HMGCoA

HOLISTIC APPROACH

Page 26: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

SIADH

CRITICALLY ILL CMP

IMMUNO SUPR.

POST CA SYNDROME

SIRS/ALI ARDS CATECHOL

ADM.

PHEOCHR.

CSW/RSW RENAL STUNNING

SAH

HYPER CATAB.

SEPSIS

TBI

Stunning

Band contraction

Uncoupling of biological oscillators

Reversibility potential

Hysteresis

HRV “fingerprint”

Page 27: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Tone related paradigms

How should one quantify tone state? How is tone related to ΔMAP responsiveness? Is tone a prognostic factor?

Page 28: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

I = V / R (Ohm’s law)

Q = (P1- P2) / R

CO = (MAP - PRA) / SVR

SVR -mathematical counterfeit-

α

ctgα =(MAP-Pc)/Q Pc=critical closing pressure ctgα = Ra

Page 29: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Why a critical closing pressure? -intuitive image-

Page 30: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

What if it exists a critical closing pressure? -intuitive image-

Raynaud Arteriovenous

malformation

Page 31: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Measuring CCP

ctgα = (MAP-Pc)/Q Pc = critical closing pressure ctgα = Ra

α

Page 32: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

On the edge of waterfalls

Page 33: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Is there any purpose in waterfalls?

Organ specific PCC reflecting organ

specific vascular control

Vital organ perfusion is more efficiently

maintained

Arterial flow stability during short

lasting Pcv changes

A Pcc-Pmsf gradient means transient

heart/brain flow during stop-flow

conditions

Page 34: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Rsys vs Ra

Ra=0.52•Rsys-0.55

Pearson correlation 0.945

If it were that easy!

Page 35: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Naeije’s pressure/flow diagram -CCP in pulmonary vessels-

PcPpa

PlaPpaPVRaPVR

Inflow

pressure

Outflow

pressure

Pla Pc

Ppa PVR = (Ppa – Pla) / Q ->A PVRa = (Ppa – Pc) / Q ->B

A: Pla>Pc B: Pc>Pla

1►2: no change

1►3: VD

A

B’

B

PVR=tgα

1►2: VC 1►3: no change

A

B

PVR when Pla>Pc

PVR as seen through PVR = (Ppa – Pla) / Q

Q or Ppa

PVR

PVR when Pla<Pc

Ppa

Pla

Pc

P’c

α

α PVRa=tgα

PVR→∞

1

2

3

PVR→∞

PVR→tgα

PVR→tgα tgα

cb

cx

bxaPVR

x→∞=>PVR=PVRa=tgα

x→Pc=>(x-c)→0=> =>PVR→∞ Q

Page 37: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Magder’s view -didacticism with a taste of mathematical compromise-

Should the flow begin to go down, then Pv will go upwards (in this picture it appears to stand still). This Pv’s rise will dampen the resistance’s (SVR’s) rise but it will not abrogate it (Pv’s rise is less than Part’s fall due to Cart<Cven). So… SVR will appear as rising with falling flow. Should you consider Pcrit as the outflow pressure, only then you shall grasp the real picture: the tone stands still.

Page 38: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts
Page 39: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

MAP’s preload dependence

Page 40: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

MAP’s preload dependence

Page 41: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

MAP’s preload dependence -ventriculo-arterial coupling diagram-

Ees=tgα=Pes/(EDV-SV-Vo)

Ea=tgβ=Pes/SV

Pes=a•(Ved-Vo) unde

a=1/(1/Ea+1/Ees)

Page 42: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

High baseline Ea, Ees(ESPVR)

Diastolic dysfunction(EDPVR)

High sympathetic overdrive/panic

Great redistribution potential

Active inflammation capable of

modulating Ea,EDPVR

Little to no involvement of Ees

ΔEes=0

keyw

ord

s

Page 43: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

MAP’s preload dependence

PPV SVV

PPV/SVV=

Eadyn

0.89

Eadyn echivaleaza cu tonus vasomotor.

Page 44: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

MAP’s preload dependence

Pentru Eadyn>0.89 cresterile tensionale pentru

acelasi SVV sunt mai pronuntate si denota un tonus

vasomotor mai accentuat.

Page 45: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Tone and prognosis -cardiogenic shock focus-

Page 46: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts
Page 47: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

T

O

N

E

F

O

C

U

S

Page 48: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

T

O

N

E

F

O

C

U

S

Page 49: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Weaning failure-another paradigm shift

Weaning failure

Redistribution Lusitropism Inotropism

Page 50: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Weaning failure

Redistribution

Why does pulmonary venous pressure rise after

onset of LV dysfunction: a theoretical analysis

Gelm→n’s two comp→rtment model

The decrease in intrathoracic pressure favours redistribution

Page 51: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Weaning failure

Lusitropism

Myocardial ischemia

► WOB

► tachycardia

► hypoxemia

RV dilation: RV/LV interdependence

► increase in venous return

► increase in PVR

LV afterload induced fall in relaxation

r→te filling pressure hypoxemi→, panic, sympathetic surge, myocardial

ischemia

Page 52: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Weaning failure

Inotropism

Effect of intrathoracic pressure on left ventricular performance, Buda NEJM 1979

Left ventricular function during weaning of patients with chronic Obstructive pulmonary disease, Richard ICM 1994

Page 53: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

LUSITROPISM

-shift in focus-

Page 54: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts
Page 55: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts
Page 56: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts
Page 57: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts
Page 58: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Right ventricular protective ventilation -echo era-

Page 59: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Right ventricular protective ventilation -echo era-

Page 60: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Right ventricular protective ventilation -echo era-

Page 61: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts
Page 62: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Fluid responsiveness -echo era-

Page 63: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

• Is the patient unaffected by serious valvular disease?

• Is the patient unaffected by right ventricle dysfunction or severe left ventricle dysfunction?

• Is the patient ventilated without spontaneous efforts?

• Is the patient ventilated in nonprotective ventilation (TV at least 8ml/kg)?

• Is the patient in sinus rhythm( or other regulated

rhythm)?

• How is Ecw versus El?

• How is the patient’s IAP ?

• Have you established that the patient’s heart

rate/respiratory rate ratio is > 3.6? • Which treshhold will you use for your binary

decision?

• Have you established your patient’s compliance in order to standardize the VE?

2%

Page 64: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

F

L

U

I

D

R

E

S

P

O

N

S

I

V

E

N

E

S

S

Page 65: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts
Page 66: Hemodynamics - paradigm shifts

Welcome

to

the echo era !

Oct 2014