Helsinki University of Technology Department of Industrial Engineering and Management © Karlos...
-
Upload
meghan-lang -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
3
Transcript of Helsinki University of Technology Department of Industrial Engineering and Management © Karlos...
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
Systematic Project Management: Aspects on Uncertainty and on
Assigning ResponsibilitiesKarlos Artto
HUT / Department of Industrial Engineering and Management
S-72.124 Product Development ofTelecommunication Systems
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
Systematic Project Management: Aspects on Uncertainty and on
Assigning Responsibilities - Lecture Content:
• Maintaining the Strategic Perspective on the Project Product during the Project Life Cycle
• Taking Uncertainty into Account: Risk Identification and Risk Analysis Applications (Case)
• Organizing for Communication and Responsibility Assignments (Risk Management as a Communication Tool)
• Examples and Cases, Risk Management Applications in Industry
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
• NEW PRODUCT PLATFORMS
DELIVERY PROJECTS
BODY OF PRODUCT KNOWLEDGE
• PRODUCT PLATFORMS
PRODUCT ARCHITECTURES AND VARIATIONS
MODEL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
DESIGN RULES ETC.
FEEDBACK SUPPORT
COMPANY PRODUCTS
PROJECT PRODUCTS
COMPANY LEVEL
PROJECT LEVEL
Analogy between product development, and a delivery of an unique project
Source: Meklin, Lahti, Kovanen, Arenius, Artto 1999
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
Goals and Methods Matrix
Methodswell
defined
Goals well defined
No
Yes
Type 2:Product
Development
Type 4:Research &
OrganizationalChange
Type 1:Engineering
Type 3:Systems
Development
Yes No
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
Approaches to Manage the Basic Types of Projects
Research projects: Setting goals and measuring progress against those goals.
New product development (NPD) projects: Managing a diverse group of technical specialists, focus on quality and time.
Change, organizational reengineering projects: Team building and refinement of objectives.
Information technology (IT), information system (I/S) projects: Tight project control and readiness to adapt to changing requirements from the customer.
Building construction projects: Control of labor hours and cost control is important.
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
Milestones 1
Activity entity 1
Activity entity 2
Activity entity 3
Milestones 2
Milestones 3
Maintaining the Focus on the Progress of the Project Product: The Milestone Plan
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
Th e P rocesses :D efin in g /In it ia t in g ,P lan n in g ,E xecu tin g ,C on tro llin g ,C los in g
P ro jec t P h ases an d th e P ro jec t L ife C yc le ,P ro jec t S takeh o ld ers , S oc ioecon om ic in flu en ces ,O rg an iza tion a l In flu en ces ,K ey G en era l M an ag em en t S k ills
Th e P ro jec tM an ag em en t
C on text
P ro jec tS cop e
M an ag em en t
P ro jec tT im e
M an ag em en t
P ro jec tC os t
M an ag em en t
P ro jec tQ u a lity
M an ag em en t
P ro jec tH u m an
R esou rceM an ag em en t
P ro jec tC om m u n ica tion s
M an ag em en t
P ro jec tR isk
M an ag em en t
P ro jec tP rocu rem en tM an ag em en t
P ro jec tIn teg ra tion
M an ag em en t
P ro jec tM an ag em en t
Project Management (Areas)
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
Risk Management Overview
R iskId en tifica tion
R iskQ u an tifica tion
R esp on seD eve lop m en t
R iskC on tro l
P ro jec t R iskM an ag em en t
According to PMI PMBOK
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
Risks of Different Magnitude
Probability
Cost
Low Risk
Medium Risk
High Risk
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
RISK ITEMS (1 - 6) OF THE PLANT DELIVERY Risk impacts on the basic estimate:The following risk items are identified as items that Minimum Most Maximumaffect the overall baseline concept of the turnkey Probabledelivery. ($ million) ($ million) ($ million)Risk impacts are estimated in monetary values asindependent impacts on the $200 million basic estimatethat corresponds to the original risk-free baseline.
1 TECHNICAL RISKS 1.1 Reduced output 0,0 0,0 0,01.2 Reduced efficiency 0,0 0,0 0,01.3 Scope of supply risks, main contractor -0,1 1,0 2,01.4 Scope of supply risks, others -0,1 0,5 1,0
Considerations at a detailed level ofdependent delay items 2.1 - 2.5
2 SCHEDULE RISKS Minimum Most prob. Maximum2.1 Delays due to offshore works 0,0 1,0 15,02.2 Delays due to process or commissioning problems 0,0 1,0 5,02.3 Delays due to problems in building construction 0,0 0,5 3,02.4 Problems originated by accidents 0,0 0,0 5,02.5 Strikes 0,0 0,0 2,0
2.1 - 2.5 J oint estimate of delay effects 0,0 2,5 25,0
3 CONTRACTUAL RISKS WITH MAIN CONTRACTOR3.1 Claims by the contractor 0,5 1,0 3,03.2 Force Majeure 0,0 0,0 5,0
4 REGULATIONS RISKS4.1 Delays due to authorities 0,0 0,5 2,04.2 Environmental problems 0,0 0,5 2,0
5 PRODUCTION START RELATED PROBLEMS 0,0 1,0 2,0
6 WARRANTY PERIOD6.1 Spare parts 0,0 0,0 0,06.2 Maintenance 0,0 0,0 0,06.3 Availability 0,0 0,5 5,06.4 Additional decrease of efficiency 0,0 0,0 2,0
COMBINED RISK ESTIMATE (PERT)Total risk impact, mean value 13,2Total risk impact, standard deviation 4,4
RiskAnalysis
Case
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
COMBINED RISK IMPACT ESTIMATE(Risk items 1 - 6)
0
100
0 5 10 15 20 25
Cost ($ million)
Risk Analysis Case cont’d
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
MAGNITUDES OF RISKS (by standard deviation)
0,0
4,5
1.1
Reduc
ed o
utpu
t
1.2
Reduc
ed e
fficien
cy
1.3
Scope
of s
upply
risk
s, m
ain c
ontra
ctor
1.4
Scope
of s
upply
risk
s, o
ther
s
2.1
- 2.5
Join
t es
timat
e of
dela
y eff
ects
3.1
Claim
s by
the
cont
ract
or
3.2
Force
Maje
ure
4.1
Delays
due
to a
utho
rities
4.2
Enviro
nmen
tal p
roble
ms
5 PRODUCTIO
N STA
RT RELA
TED PRO...
6.1
Spare
par
ts
6.2
Main
tena
nce
6.3 A
vaila
bility
6.4 A
dditio
nal d
ecre
ase
of e
fficien
cy
Risk Items
Mag
nit
ud
e o
f R
isk
(Sta
nd
ard
dev
iati
on
) $
mill
ion
Risk Analysis Case cont’d
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
An Analogy in ‘Critical Chain’ -method:Team Focus on Buffers
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
The Team Aspect Reconsidered: Risk Analysis Day of HUT TAI Research Centre
Pre-assignment
Individual opinions of important risks
Risk Analysis Day
Results
Open Communication
Response Development and Responsibilities
Increased Awareness
Integration:1) Within the team2) Within the risk management process3) Responses to company’s responsibility areas
Documentation, reports
Helsinki University of TechnologyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
© Karlos Artto / HUT 2000
Conclusions
- Lecture Content was:
• Maintaining the Strategic Perspective on the Project Product during the Project Life Cycle
• Taking Uncertainty into Account: Risk Identification and Risk Analysis Applications (Case)
• Organizing for Communication and Responsibility Assignments (Risk Management as a Communication Tool)
• Examples and Cases, Risk Management Applications in Industry