Heat Pump Clothes Dryer - energy.govof a residential heat pump clothes dryer with energy factor > 6...
Transcript of Heat Pump Clothes Dryer - energy.govof a residential heat pump clothes dryer with energy factor > 6...
-
Kyle Gluesenkamp; [email protected] Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Heat Pump Clothes Dryer 2017 Building Technologies Office Peer Review
-
2
Project Summary
Timeline: Start date: Oct 1, 2012 Planned end date: Sept 30, 2017 Key Milestones 1. Experimental validation to demonstrate utility
of model as design tool. Met: Jan 31, 2017 2. Document next generation design. Upcoming:
Apr 30, 2017
Budget: Total Project $ to Date: β’ DOE: $3770k
Total Project $: β’ DOE: $3770k
Key Partners:
Project Outcome: Evaluate the technical and commercial viability of a residential heat pump clothes dryer, configured for US market, that enables reduced energy consumption meeting 2020 MYPP target of EF greater than 6.
GE Appliances (CRADA)
-
3
Purpose and Objectives Problem Statement: Evaluate the technical and commercial viability of a residential heat pump clothes dryer with energy factor > 6 lb/kWh. Dozens of models are available in Europe, but very few in the US. Research is needed to configure a HPCD to meet U.S. consumer desire for drying large loads with fast dry times and low price premium. Target Market and Audience: Residential clothes drying. Unit shipments of 8M units/year, at $300-1500 retail price (weighted towards $600-1000 range). Market size (2017) 622 TBtu/yr. Impact of Project: Introducing a high energy factor HPCD with high energy factor, fast dry time, and modest price premium is needed to finally create a substantial market for heat pump dryers in the U.S.
-
4
Objective
β’ Advance drying state-of-the-art at unprecedentedly low cost
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 20 40 60 80 100
CEF
[lb
clot
h/kW
h]
Dry time [minutes] (DOE 8.45 lb load)
Existing HP products (LG, WP, Asko) ER
Existing electric resistance products
$1200-1600 retail State of art
HPCD
Project goal
Fast, E-STAR
Measured 2nd generation ORNL/GEA prototype
Combined energy factor: πͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺ = ππππππππππ ππππππππ π π π π π π π π π π π π πππ π πππππ π π π πππ π ππππ πππππππππππππ π π π
-
5
Approach Tactic: New, more rigorous approach to modeling and validation to minimize component sizes and costs while maintaining favorable dry time and efficiency. Key Issues: Dry time, price premium, and efficiency. A successful product in the US market would need to address all three of these issues: β’ Efficiency needed to differentiate product in the market β’ Dry time needs to be acceptable to consumers β’ Price premium needs to be typical for premium laundry products Distinctive Characteristics: Faster dry time, lower projected cost, and higher CEF compared with existing HPCDs on the US market.
-
6
Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Cycle
β’ βClosedβ cycle β ductless, no hole through wall β’ Recover condenser waste heat to evaporate water in clothes β’ Use evaporator to condense and remove moisture
-
7
β’ Despite apparent simplicity in a process diagram, HPCD is a complex and highly-coupled system.
β’ It is only loosely coupled to any fixed state points.
β’ Approach: fresh modeling framework and validation by prototyping
HPCD Modeling: a Highly Coupled System
Thermodynamic cycle
(heat pump)
Psychrometric cycle
Pneumatic system (blower,
leakages) coupled
Drum heat and mass exchanger
Leakage-related transfers:
Latent heat
Sensible heat
Convective and radiative heat
transfer
Dryer System Surroundings
-
8
Notes: β’ Dry time and compressor
discharge temperature - important design targets.
β’ Clothing moisture content mass ratio (lbwater/lbcloth) starts at 57.5%, ends at 4%.
Start drying
Water removal
Heating Capacity
Heating
Sink Source
Psychrometric process
End drying
Air temperature
HPCD Modeling: a Transient Drying Process H
umid
ity ra
tio
-
9
Progress and Accomplishments Accomplishments: β’ Accurate hardware-based design model developed in ORNLβs HPDM
platform β New drum effectiveness approach advances the science of dryer
analysis β’ 2 generations of prototypes fabricated and evaluated β’ Cost reductions achieved via model-guided design process Market Impact: β’ Over 50% reduction in incremental manufacturing cost achieved β’ Assessment of commercialization potential under consideration Awards/Recognition: None Lessons Learned: Key parts of modeling effort can be simplified; other key parts cannot. Some simplified models are being disseminated in publications.
-
10
Progress and Accomplishments: Timeline
FY12-13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 today
Gen 2a Prototype Gen 1 Prototype
Sealing improvements
Develop drum effectiveness
model
Characterize various drums for their effectiveness as function of key variables
Gen 2 Prototype design
Gen 2 Prototype fabrication
Incorporate leakage into modeling
framework
Experimental activities
Modeling activities
Other activities
Initial evaluation
Gen 1 Delivered to
ORNL
Gen 1 Prototype fabrication
Charge optimization; evaluation
EXV changed
Charge optimization
Gen 2b design
Gen 2b fab. and evaluation
Gen 2b
FY12-13 Combined washer/
dryer research
Establish CRADA
Establish dryer modeling capability
-
11
Accomplishments: Validated Design Model
β’ Model predictions accurate compared with 12-test experimental test matrix:
Test # Deviation: CEF [-]
Deviation: dry time [min]
Deviation: compressor discharge [Β°F]
1 -4.0% -0.1 7.8 2 -2.5% -0.7 2.7 3 -3.9% 1.1 19.4 4 -5.2% 2.1 17.7 5 9.2% -4.5 1.5 6 10.0% -5.3 0.4 7 6.9% -1.6 13.6 8 2.5% -1.8 21.3 9 1.1% -1.1 7.2
10 3.6% -4.5 5.9 11 -0.9% -0.4 20.5 12 0.3% 0.7 15.3
Average 1.4% -1.3 11.1 Stdev 4.9% 2.2 7.4 Max dev 10.0% 5.3 21.3
-
12
Progress and Accomplishments
System incremental manufacturing cost lowered by more than 2x, compared with conventional heat pump dryers. Enabled by:
β Rigorous modeling and validation framework
β Consideration of system-level effects of component selections
β New method of drum heat and mass transfer effectiveness modeling
β Pursuing cost-effective design changes suggested by model
Gen 2a prototype under evaluation at ORNL
-
13
ππππππππ ,ππ = πππ π ,ππ β (πππ π ,ππ β ππππππ ,ππ) Γ (1.0β πΈπΈππ)
ππππππππ ,ππ = πππ π ,ππ β (πππ π ,ππ β ππππππ ,ππ) Γ (1.0 β πΈπΈπ»π»)
ππππ = ππππππππ ,ππππππππ Γ (π»π»ππππππ ,ππβπ»π»ππππ ,ππ)
ππππππππππππππππππππ = ππππππππ ,ππππππππ Γ (ππππππππ ,ππ β ππππππ ,ππ)
β’ Definition newly applied to dryer application
β’ Effectiveness has strong dependence on RMC
β’ Advanced the science of clothes dryer analysis: first publication of empirical drum effectiveness-based HPCD modeling and design
Mathematical Model:
y = -72.775x4 + 110.89x3 - 60.94x2 + 14.394x - 0.308
RΒ² = 0.9904
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00%
Heat
&M
ass
Tran
sfer
Effe
ctiv
enes
s
RMC
Effectiveness Reducedfrom Lab Data
Poly. (EffectivenessReduced from LabData)
Model VCS in the transient process
Empirical Drum Heat & Mass Transfer Effectiveness
Remaining moisture content (RMC)
http://www.ornl.gov/%7Ewlj/hpdm/MarkVII.shtml
-
14
Developed New Leakage Characterization Technique
β’ Seal everything not to be measured β’ Pressurize drum with calibrated blower to determine flow
coefficient (Cv) of segment under test. Repeat for all segments. β’ Measure pressures in situ during normal operation β’ Combine Cv and ΞP measurements to calculate leakage flows
Dryer air segment
Leak
age
flow
rate
Gau
ge p
ress
ure
π½π½πππππππππ π ππππππππ = πͺπͺπͺπͺ βπ·π·
-
15
Refrigerant state points Power consumption
Air side: evaporator inlet RH
Model Accurately Predicts Performance; State Points
40
50
60
70
80
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
Pres
sure
[psi
a]
RMC
Suction Pressure
Psuc_Measure
Psuc_Model
Measured
Predicted
100105110115120125130135140145
0 0.2 0.4 0.6Te
mpe
ratu
re [F
]RMC
Condenser out Temperature [F]
TevapOut_Measure
TevapOut_Model
Measured
Predicted
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
Com
pres
sor P
ower
[W]
RMC
CompPower_Measured
CompPower_Model
Measured
Predicted
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
RH
RMC
measure
ModelMeasured Predicted
β’ Predicted energy factor within 10% β’ Predicted drying cycle time within 5 minutes β’ Predicted max discharge temperature within 20Β°F
-
16
Project Integration: Commercialization prospects under consideration by industry partner Partners, Subcontractors, and Collaborators: Undergraduate interns: Dakota Goodman, University of Louisville; Amar Mohabir, University of Florida Communications: β’ Shen, B., Gluesenkamp, K., Bansal, P., Beers, D. (2016). βHeat pump
clothes dryer model developmentβ. 16th Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 7/2016.
β’ Gluesenkamp, K.R., Goodman, D., Shen, B., Patel, V. βAn Efficient Correlation for Heat and Mass Transfer Effectiveness in Tumble-type Clothes Dryer Drumsβ (manuscript in preparation)
β’ Pradeep Bansal, Amar Mohabir, William Miller (2016). βA novel method to determine air leakage in heat pump clothes dryersβ. Energy 96:1-7.
Project Integration and Collaboration
-
17
β’ Finalize Gen 2b design refinements β final generation of prototype incorporating lessons learned
β’ Finalize experimental evaluation
β’ Commercialization determination
Next Steps and Future Plans
-
18
REFERENCE SLIDES
-
19
Project Budget: 3770k Variances: None Cost to Date: 3613k Additional Funding: None
Budget History
FY 2012 β FY 2016 (past)
FY 2017 (current)
FY 2018 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share 3392k * 378k * 0 0
Project Budget
* In-kind contribution from CRADA partner β exact total is confidential information
-
20
Project Plan and Schedule
Project ScheduleProject Start: Oct 1, 2012Projected End: Sept 30, 2017
Task
Q1
(Oct
-Dec
)
Q2
(Jan-
Mar
)
Q3
(Apr
-Jun)
Q4
(Jul-S
ep)
Q1
(Oct
-Dec
)
Q2
(Jan-
Mar
)
Q3
(Apr
-Jun)
Q4
(Jul-S
ep)
Q1
(Oct
-Dec
)
Q2
(Jan-
Mar
)
Q3
(Apr
-Jun)
Q4
(Jul-S
ep)
Past WorkDevelop air leakage modelFabricated 2nd generation prototypeCEF evaluationGO/NO-GO: Design goals metGO/NO-GO: Model validated Current/Future WorkNext generation designEvaluate CEF
Completed WorkActive Task (in progress work)Milestone/Deliverable (Originally Planned) Milestone/Deliverable (Actual)
FY2015 FY2016 FY2017Go/No-Go Milestone
Sheet1
Project Schedule
Project Start: Oct 1, 2012Completed Work
Projected End: Sept 30, 2017Active Task (in progress work)
Milestone/Deliverable (Originally Planned)
Milestone/Deliverable (Actual)
Go/No-Go Milestone
FY2015FY2016FY2017
TaskQ1 (Oct-Dec)Q2 (Jan-Mar)Q3 (Apr-Jun)Q4 (Jul-Sep)Q1 (Oct-Dec)Q2 (Jan-Mar)Q3 (Apr-Jun)Q4 (Jul-Sep)Q1 (Oct-Dec)Q2 (Jan-Mar)Q3 (Apr-Jun)Q4 (Jul-Sep)
Past Work
Develop air leakage model
Fabricated 2nd generation prototype
CEF evaluation
GO/NO-GO: Design goals met
GO/NO-GO: Model validated
Current/Future Work
Next generation design
Evaluate CEF
Insert more Milestones as needed
Slide Number 1Project SummaryPurpose and ObjectivesObjectiveApproachSlide Number 6HPCD Modeling: a Highly Coupled SystemSlide Number 8Progress and AccomplishmentsProgress and Accomplishments: TimelineAccomplishments: Validated Design ModelProgress and AccomplishmentsEmpirical Drum Heat & Mass Transfer Effectiveness Slide Number 14Model Accurately Predicts Performance; State PointsProject Integration and CollaborationNext Steps and Future PlansSlide Number 18Project BudgetProject Plan and Schedule