Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

25
Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones
  • date post

    20-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    218
  • download

    4

Transcript of Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Page 1: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Hearing & Deafness (4)Pitch Perception

1. Pitch of pure tones

2. Pitch of complex tones

Page 2: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Pitch of pure tones

Place theory

Place of maximum in basilar membrane excitation (excitation pattern) - which fibers excited

Timing theoryTemporal pattern of firing -

how are the fibers firing -

needs phase locking

Page 3: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Phase-locking

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Inter-spike IntervalsResponse to Low Frequency tones

time (t)

Response to High Frequency tones > 5kHz

Random intervals

time (t)

2 periods 1 periodnerve spike

Page 4: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Pure tones: place vs timing

Low frequency tones

Place & timing

High frequency tones

Place only

1. Phase locking only for tones below 4 kHz

2. Frequency difference threshold increases rapidly above 4 kHz.

3. Musical pitch absent above 4 kHz (top of piano)

Page 5: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Frequency thresholds increase

above 4 kHz

B C J Moore (1973)JASA.

Phase-lock?

Yes No

Page 6: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Pitch of complex tones: fundamental & harmonics

Page 7: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Helmholtz’s place theory

Pitch = frequency of fundamentalCoded by place of excitation

Peaks in excitation

Page 8: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Arguments against Helmholtz

1. Fundamental not necessary for pitch (Seebeck)

Page 9: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Missing fundamental

No fundamental but you still hear the pitch at 200 Hz

Track 37

Page 10: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Distortion: Helmholtz fights back

Sound stimulus

Middle-eardistortion

Producesf2 - f1

600 - 400

Sound going into cochlea

Page 11: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Against Helmholtz: Masking the fundamental

Unmasked complex still has a pitch of 200 Hz

Tracks 40-42

Page 12: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

200 850 1050 1250

200

amp

Against Helmholtz: Enharmonic sounds

Middle-ear distortion gives difference tone (1050 - 850 = 200)

BUT

Pitch heard is actually about 210

Tracks 38-39

Page 13: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Schouten’s theory

Pitch due to beats of unresolved harmonics

Tracks 43-45

Page 14: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Problems with Schouten’s theory (1)

1. Resolved harmonics dominant in pitch perception - not unresolved (Plomp, 1967)

“down”

frequency (Hz)200

1.0

400600 800 2000 2400

“down”

Page 15: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Problems with Schouten (2)

2. Pitch discrimination much worse for unresolved than resolved (Houtsma & Smurzynski (1990, JASA).

res --> unres

good

bad

Page 16: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Problems with Schouten (3)

3. Musical pitch is weak for complex sounds consisting only of unresolved harmonics (Houtsma, 1984, Music Perception)

Page 17: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Against Schouten (4): Dichotic harmonics

• Pitch of complex tone still heard with one harmonic to each ear (Houtsma & Goldstein, 1972)

400 600

200 Hz pitch

No chance of distortion tones or physical beats

Page 18: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Goldstein’s theory

• Pitch based on resolved harmonics• Brain estimates frequencies of resolved harmonics

(eg 402 597 806) - could be by a place mechanism, but more likely through phase-locked timing information.

• Then finds the best-fitting consecutive harmonic series to those numbers (eg 401 602 804) -> pitch of 200.5

Page 19: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Two pitch mechanisms ?

• Goldstein has difficulty with the fact that

unresolved harmonics have a pitch at all.

• So: Goldstein’s mechanism could be good

as the main pitch mechanism

• With Schouten’s being a separate (weaker)

mechanism for unresolved harmonics

Page 20: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Schouten’s + Goldstein's theories

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

base apexlog (ish) frequency

2004001600

resolvedunresolved

600800

Output of 1600 Hz filter Output of 200 Hz filter

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

1/200s = 5ms

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

1/200s = 5ms

Page 21: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Some other sounds that give pitch

• SAM Noise: envelope timing - not spectral– Sinusoidally amplitude modulated noise

• Rippled noise - envelope timing & spectral– Comb-filter (f(t) + f(t-T)) -> sinusoidal spectrum– Huygens @ the steps from a fountain– Quetzal @ Chichen Itza

• Binaural interactions

100 200

Page 22: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Huygen’s repetition pitch

Christian Huygens in 1693 noted that the noise produced by a fountain at the chateau of Chantilly de la Cour was reflected by a stone staircase in such a way that it produced a musical tone. He correctly deduced that this was due to the successively longer time intervals taken for the reflections from each step to reach the listener's ear.

Page 23: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.
Page 24: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Effect of SNHL

• Wider bandwidths, so fewer resolved harmonics

• Therefore more reliance on Schouten's mechanism - less musical pitch?

Page 25: Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Problem we haven’t addressed

• What happens when you have two

simultaneous pitches - as with two voices or

two instruments - or just two notes on a

piano?

• How do you know which harmonic is from

which pitch?