Health System Funding Reform: Driving Change using Technology · Health System Funding Reform:...
Transcript of Health System Funding Reform: Driving Change using Technology · Health System Funding Reform:...
Health System Funding Reform: Driving Change using Technology Presentation to – Canadian Health Informatics Association
April 2014 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
V2.4 (2014-04-28)
Session Objectives
• To provide a high-level overview of Health System Funding Reform
• Highlight the role and importance of technology, communication and information in support of funding reform and the healthcare system as a whole
2
Our Vision to Achieving Value
• Our goal is to make Ontario the healthiest place in North America to grow up and grow old
3
1. Keeping Ontarians Healthy
2. Faster access and a stronger link to family health care
3. Right care, right time, right place
Our Goals
A focus on standardization, appropriateness, productivity and safety, innovation implemented at scale is essential.
Our Strategy to Achieving Value Health system transformation is about redesigning the system to allow for more flexible delivery models which
promote access, quality and allows for services to be provided in a fiscally sustainable manner.
Transformation will be guided by evidence and co-designed with the sector.
4
Funding Reform Right Care, Right Place, Right Time
Wellness & Prevention
Integration & Execution
4 Pillars of Transformation
Empowering people to make healthier
choices and improving health
outcomes for children
Paying for health care services based on the needs of the patient
and on performance to drive quality, efficiency
and effectiveness
Maximizing investments by shifting services to more
appropriate and cost effective settings and
optimizing existing resources
Strengthening coordinated care to improve access to
health care services and maximizing quality
and value
54 Health Links
Population Coverage: 7,723,490
Total Number of High Users:
720,000
Over 1000 multi-sectoral
Partners
• The response to Health Links in year one has exceeded expectation • There is at least one Health Link in every LHIN and some LHINs have full coverage. • Future: 90+ Health Links, providing full coverage across the province – we’re already halfway there! • The impact of other early successes have centred around local and regional innovations in
programming, clinical pathways, and governance.
Health Links: Current State
5
Health System Funding Reform
Aligning Incentives and Accountabilities by Funding For High Quality Care and Better Patient Outcomes
6
Global Funding
An evidence-based approach with incentives to deliver high quality care based on: • Best available evidence and best practices • Needs of the population served • Services delivered • Number of patients
A historical approach where health service providers received lump sum funding • Hospitals, on average, received 75-90% of their funding
from global budgets • Majority of the funding is in the form of:
o Base annualized funding o New incremental funding o Remaining funding acquired from other sources
(i.e. preferred accommodation, alternative revenue etc. )
We are moving from the global provider-focused funding model to one that revolves around the person
Health System Funding Reform
7
Ontario’s Health System Funding Reform (HSFR) approach will draw from over 25 years of international Activity Based Funding experience
• Patient focused funding systems reimburse providers at an established rate, based upon quality care for standard patient groups
• Ontario is one of the last leading jurisdictions
to move down this path
Pat
ient
Foc
used
Fun
ding
Ado
ptio
n Ti
mel
ine
8
Activity Based Funding is about Patients
Ambulatory
Nursing
Clinical Laboratories
Peri Operative Services
Health Disciplines
Pharmacy
Medical Imaging
Infrastructure
9
Patient care needs the information and accessibility that technology brings…
Health System Funding Reform (HSFR) has two funding components
• HBAM is a ‘made in Ontario' funding model
• QBPs are clusters of patients with clinically related diagnoses/ treatments and functional needs identified by an evidence-based framework
Note: At the culmination of HSFR, HSPs will account for approximately 70% of funding
HSFR
Health-Based Allocation Model
(HBAM)
Global Funding
(Non-HSFR) Quality-Based Procedures
(QBPs)
10
1. Health Based Allocation Model (HBAM)
Patient demographics • Age, gender, growth projections,
socio-economic status and geography
Clinical data • Complexity of care and type of care
Financial data
11
A funding model that optimizes the allocation of available funding
2. The ‘Quality’ in Quality-Based Procedures • Best practices informed by clinical consensus and best available evidence
• Engage in clinical process improvement/re-design and adopt best practices
• Best practice pricing to strengthen the linkage between quality and funding
• Develop indicators to evaluate and monitor actual practice
• Broaden scope of QBPs to strengthen the continuity of care
• Ensure every patient gets the right care, at the right time, at the right place
12
Developing and Implementing QBPs
Acute Inpatient • Entering Year 3 (2014-15) of QBP implementation • To date (2012-13 and 2013-14), QBPs represent 11% of the total
provincial budget
Transition from Acute Inpatient Admissions • Existing QBPs expanded to address transition from inpatient
admission/episode
Community • Concurrent work underway to define community-focused QBPs
Integrated Indicator Scorecard • Provide a starting point for monitoring and evaluating the impact of
the introduction of each QBP 13
Technology and Healthcare Advances
• Technology can play a role in containing costs, improving access, and saving lives
• An electronic medical record system is often touted as the utopian marriage of healthcare and technology savvy, so let’s
• We’re spending more, but are we getting value for our money?
14
$$$$
• Encourage hospitals and doctors’ offices to digitize health care records
$$$$
• Get better at crunching data to offer a better diagnosis and treatment
$$$$
• Help doctors communicate with patients and their peers
Data (System) Requirements for Healthcare Funding
• MIS, HBAM, QBPs, Forecasting and Budgeting Financial Data
• EMR, HBAM, QBPs, CPOE, Order Sets Clinical Data
• QBPs, Human Resources, Materials and Supplies, Medical Technology Case Costing Data
• Capacity Planning Utilization Management Data
• Indicators/Scorecards/Dashboards Performance Measurement Data
Workload Measurement Data
Business Intelligence
Impact Analysis
15
The Trouble with Data
Data not understood is bad data
No matter how much data we have, we always want more No matter how good and validated the data is,
we always want it to be better
No matter how quick it is, it could always be available quicker Everyone else has better information systems than we do
The darn data never answers the questions it should
The data doesn’t always prove what we know is right
16
Data Quality Culture
17
Understanding
Components of a ‘Good Culture’
Multiple Data Inputs into HSFR Modelling
18
Clinical •Acute Inpatient (DAD) •Day Surgery (NACRS) •Emergency Room (NACRS) • Inpatient Rehab (NRS) •Complex Continuing Care (CCRS) • Inpatient Mental Health (OMHRS) •Home Care (HCD)
Financial •Ontario Cost Distribution Methodology (OCDM)
•Management Information Systems (MIS)
HBAM Modelling
Case Costing •Ontario Case Costing Initiative
QBP Calculation
HBAM Adjustments
Population •Statistics Canada census data and Ministry of Finance population projection updates
Socio-economic Status •From Statistics Canada
Rurality
Medical Trainee Days
Coding and Data Quality: Raising the Bar
It’s not the Ministry’s data: it’s the organization’s • Overt and transparent link between coded patient data and funding • Improved data quality benefits everyone • Documentation (physician and departmental) challenges need to be
resolved, need for issues to be escalated • Likely need new data elements; keeping abreast of standards even
more important
Patient Assignment to all QBPs based on coded data • Funds to be paid for different QBPs will vary • Not all patients fit a QBP criteria • Capacity planning…it’s not just about volume reconciliation
19
• Complete, clear, and accurate documentation is the foundation for complete and accurate coding of all types of medical records
• Normal scapegoat for any performance results is coding
• What role does Computer Assisted Coding have?
• Education sessions held by Medical Records departments for physicians and clinicians usually result in improved quality of charted data
• Main concern is getting physicians to consistently and accurately ensure highest quality of charted data
• Data review process
• Optimizing processes
Clinical (Patient) Coding and Data Quality
20
Deficiencies in the documentation result from:
• Failure of health care provider to record information
• Lack of detail or specificity
• Conflicting or inconsistent information
• Illegible documents
• Missing documents
Deficiencies in Documentation
21
• Process of entering medication orders or other physician instructions electronically instead of on paper charts
• The use of a CPOE system can help reduce errors related to poor handwriting or transcription of medication orders
• Although CPOE systems are designed to mimic the workflow of the paper chart, their adoption has been slow, largely because of: • Disruption to existing care settings • Cost of implementation which includes training
Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE)
22
• Helps organizations facilitate widespread CPOE physician adoption with streamlined order entry pathways, interactive worklists, and evidence-based order sets
• CPOE Reduces: • Misinterpretations and transcription errors by eliminating
handwritten medication orders
• Callbacks to physicians for clarification of ambiguous, incomplete, or illegible orders
• Medication order turnaround time: from ordering to dispensing to administration
CPOE Benefits
23
• Conveniently grouped medical orders that work to standardize diagnosis and treatment following pre-established clinical guidelines
• Step-by-step, evidence-based checklists that are used by clinicians to order treatments for patients
• Interacts with many hospital processes and support structures such as: • Drug formulary • Medication policy manual • Approved abbreviations • Method of undertaking diagnostic procedures
• Allow a physician to stop the practice of treating patients completely from memory
What are Order Sets?
24
If technology helps facilitate cost-effective care, it is providing value
Summarizing
25
Provides (and operationalizes) innovation Is not the panacea for all of our healthcare woes But it is essential to help us move forward
Technology
Raising Awareness
Public website: www.ontario.ca/healthfunding • Targeted to general public and includes presentations, videos, and
frequently asked questions
Private website: www.hsimi.on.ca (password required)
• Targeted to health service providers and includes HSFR memorandums, education materials, and archived webinars
26
Keeping you informed of HSFR-related communication and education opportunities
New users can create an account by clicking on “Create new account” from the main homepage.
Contact our helpline for questions!
Email or direct your enquires related to HSFR to the ministry health system funding Helpline:
27
or call
416-327-8379
Questions and Comments
28
Appendix
30
QBP Multi-Year Roll-out Plan
Year QBPs
Year 1 (2012-13)
1. Primary hip replacement* 2. Primary knee replacement*
3. Cataract 4. Chronic kidney disease
Year 2 (2013-14)
5. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease* 6. Stroke* 7. Congestive heart failure*
8. Non-cardiac vascular 9. Chemotherapy 10. Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Year 3 (2014-15)
Wave 1 11. Hip fracture* 12. Pneumonia 13. Tonsillectomy 14. Neonatal jaundice
Wave 2 15. Coronary artery disease 16. Aortic valve replacement 17. Cancer Surgery 18. Colposcopy 19. Knee Arthroscopy 20. Retinal Disease 21. Short-Stay Post-hospital Discharge Homecare:
Medical Discharge 22. Short-Stay Post-hospital Discharge Homecare:
Surgical Discharge *These QBPs have or are being further developed and expanded to address transition to post-acute phase in Year 3 (2014-15).