Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

38
Katherine Hebert, MCRP August 19, 2011 Health Impact Assessments: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table Presentation made possible through funding from the Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education (ORISE). The findings and conclusions in this presentation have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

Transcript of Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Page 1: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Katherine Hebert, MCRP

August 19, 2011

Health Impact Assessments: Bringing Public Health

Back to the Decision Table

Presentation made possible through funding from the Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education (ORISE). The findings and conclusions in this presentation have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

Page 2: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Quick History and Future Direction of Planning, Policy, and Public Health

Introduction to the Social Determinants of Health

HIA Definition and PurposeHIA ProcessThe Current State of HIA in the United StatesResources

Agenda

Page 3: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Not New Concept- Over Correcting

Page 4: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Social Determinants of Health

Source: http://www.pharmacymeetspublichealth.org.uk/publichealthbackground_determinants.html

Page 5: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Source: Frieden, A Framework for Public Health Action: The Health Impact Pyramid, AJPM

Policy &Planning

Page 6: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Health Impact Assessments

Public Health

Built Environment

Planning and Policies

HIA

HIA

Page 7: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Planning + Policy + Public Health

Healthy Communities

Healthier Population

Health Impact Assessments

Page 8: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

An HIA is a combination of procedures, methods and tools that systematically and prospectively judges the potential, and sometimes unintended, effects of a policy, plan, program, or project (commonly outside of the health sector) on the health of a population, and the distribution of those effects within the population. HIA identifies appropriate actions to manage those effects.

What HIA IS

Adapted from the WHO Gothenberg Consensus Paper, 1999

Page 9: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Process and Product

Process• Principles of democracy,

equity, sustainability, ethical use of data, comprehensive approach to health

• Fosters collaboration between planning, health, and policy making fields and community engagement

• Steps: screening, scoping, assessment, recommendations, report, evaluation

Product• A report (in multiple

formats for different audiences) that portrays the process, findings, and recommendations of the HIA

• Intended to be presented to decision makers prior to the decision being made

• Used as a model to other HIA practitioners and to supplement other tools/policies

Page 10: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Transportation ProjectsLand Use DecisionsHousingAgriculture/ Food Security/ Food SupplySustainability EffortsComprehensive PlansEnergyWater/ Sewer/ Waste ManagementEconomic/ EmploymentBudget

Topics HIA Have Been Applied To

Page 11: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Screening

Scoping

Assessment

Recommendations

Reporting

Evaluation

Health Impact Assessments Steps

Page 12: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Screening

•Whether or not to conduct a HIA on the proposal.

•Will a HIA add to the decision-making process?

•Are there potential health impacts?

Scoping

•How are we going to conduct the HIA? Setting an action plan.

•Identifying potential impacts to assess.

•Setting boundaries- temporal, geographic, population, etc.

Health Impact Assessments Steps

Page 13: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Assessment

•Collecting data and conducting a community profile.

•Estimating the potential impacts based on quantitative and qualitative data and processes.

•Combination of expert and community involvement.

Recom

mendations

•Develop suggestions to maximize the positive and minimize the negative health impacts.

•Prioritize recommendations and make them actionable and as specific as possible.

•Community involvement key for buy in and support of recommendations by decision makers.

Health Impact Assessments Steps

Page 14: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Reporting

•Provide public and decision makers with the process, findings, and recommendations of the HIA.

•Remember different report types for different audiences.

Evaluation

•How could the process be improved?

•What was the impact on the decision?

•What were the health outcomes of the decision made? Predictions accurate?

Health Impact Assessments Steps

Page 15: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Who Are the Players- U.S.Funding

PEWRWJF- ALRNCEH-HCDIASTHO

Training5 UniversitiesAPA/NACCHO

WebcourseSan Francisco

CourseGuides/Readings

Conferences Practitioners

Human Impact Partners

San Francisco Health Department

SOPHIAState & Local Health

OfficialsCPPW StatesUniversitiesHealthy Design

Professionals

Page 16: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

AK 5

CA 30

CO 3

FL 1

MA 3

NJ 1

Completed HIAs in the United States1999–2010: 79

MN 5

GA 6

WA 4

OR 6

OH 1

PA 2

MD 1

MT 3

Map developed in collaboration with A. Wernham, Health Impact Project and

A. Wendel and A. Dannenberg, National Center for Environmental

Health

16

NM 1

TN 1

ME 1

WI 1 NH 1

Page 17: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

AK 7

CA 47

CO 4

FL 1

MA 4

NJ 1

Completed and in Progress HIAs in the United States

1999–2010: 119MN 6

GA 8

WA 8

OR 12

OH 1

PA 2

MD 2

MT 3

Map developed in collaboration with A. Wernham, Health Impact Project and

A. Wendel and A. Dannenberg, National Center for Environmental

Health

NM 1

TN 1

ME 1

WI 1 NH 2

HI 1

TX 1

IL 1

MO1

KY 1

Page 18: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Community ProfileBaseline of Current Community ConditionsHelp Identify Health Concerns Characterize Population Pay Attention to Scale/ Challenge of Local

DataCDC Resources

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemYouth Risk Behavior Surveillance SystemSocial Determinants MapsCounty Prevalence Data MapsState Burden of Chronic DiseaseState Cancer Rate Information

Page 19: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Join the HIA Community of

Practice!

Go to www.phconnect.org to become a member and find the HIA Community of PracticeFor more information contact Katherine Hebert at [email protected]

Page 20: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

www. cdc.gov/healthyplaces/hia.htm

Page 21: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

www.healthimpactproject.org/project/opportunities

Page 22: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

www.hiaguide.org/

Page 23: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Resources on HIANACCHO, HIA Quick Guide

http://www.apho.org.uk/resource/item.aspx?RID=82413

Human Impact Partners, HIA Toolkit http://www.humanimpact.org/component/jdownloads/finish/11/81

University of Minnesota, Rapid HIA Toolkithttp://www.designforhealth.net/pdfs/HIA/BCBS_Rapidassessment_011608.pdf

Websites: HIA Gateway, HIA CLIC, CDC HIA, WHO HIA, San Francisco Bay HIA Collaborative, phConnect

Page 24: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Katherine Hebert, MCRPCommunity Planner and Researcher

Centers for Disease Control and PreventionDivision of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity

[email protected], 770-488-5247

Page 25: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Cabinet for Health and Family Services

Teresa Lovely MS CHESElaine Russell MS RD LDDr. Cecilia Watkins CHES

Health Impact Assessment (HIA)Project

Kentucky Worksite Wellness Tax Credit

Page 26: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Kentucky Receives ASTHO HIA Grant One of three states$15,000Build capacity to conduct HIAsConduct first HIA projectCollaborate with partnersShare findings and recommendationsProduce a final reportMonitor the outcome of the target

project Cabinet for Health and Family Services

Page 27: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

HIA of Kentucky Worksite Wellness Tax Credit

Page 28: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Kentucky Worksite Wellness Tax Credit Proposed House Bill  HB 74 AN ACT relating to encourage healthy lifestyles.

Original bill introduced 2008

Total credit not to exceed $100 / number of employees annually

$3,000,000 cap

Kentucky Worksite Wellness Tax Credit

Page 29: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Goal of the HIA

Research the impact of the tax credit on:

Childhood obesity

Jobs

Social cohesion in the workplace

Cabinet for Health and Family Services

Page 30: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Cabinet for Health and Family Services

Literature Review Conducted by Western Kentucky University

•Looked at obesity at national level•Kentucky’s obesity levels particularly for children•Need for an integrated approach•Workplace’s potential role – where parents are•Parent’s impact on children’s health (obesity) •The need to look at the environment and policy

Page 31: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Parents are not receiving enough information, support, and guidance on childhood obesity.

A worksite wellness program would address teaching employees (parents) about diet and physical activity

The education and support that employees (parents) receive in the workplace can positively influence the family.

Programs would need to include children and families, focus on child behavior and environment

Parents can be advocates for their children’s environment whether at home, daycare or school.

Cabinet for Health and Family Services

Childhood Obesity Impact Findings

Page 32: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

IBM’s Children Health Rebate Program

About 45 % of  IBM’s employees have children covered on the health plan.

In 2008 launched  this program to help parents assist their children in maintaining a healthy weight.

The 12-week web-based program includes a $150 cash rebate that rewards participation.

2/3 of employees who participated reported that their children were exercising

59% of children and 64% of adults improved body weight or maintained a healthy weight.

Parents and children improved in healthy eating and physical activity behaviors and a reduction in screen time

Source: Business Group on HealthCabinet for Health and Family Services

Page 33: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Jobs: Impact Findings

Lack of employment or underemployment affects ability to purchase healthy foods, maintain or improve health, and receive medical care

Reducing health care costs, improving productivity through wellness programs could lead to an increase in jobs in the state

A tax credit could lead to an increase in wellness jobs

Cabinet for Health and Family Services

Page 34: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Social Cohesion/Well-being: Impact Findings

Ky. Ranked 49 in Gallop Well –being Index Study

State’s Work Environment Index score fell from 48.3 in 2009 to 46.8 in 2010 leading to a drop in state ranking from 32 to 36 in this index

Specific populations such as urban areas and rural, particularly Appalachian reported less well-being in some factors.

Wellness programs have been shown to affect morale and improve the work environmentCabinet for Health and Family Services

Page 35: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Overall: Impact Findings

Number of companies that have wellness programs has increased from 34% in 2007 to 63% in 2010.

However most not comprehensive 94% of companies have less than 50

employeesFirms with less than 100 employees

accounted for 35 percent of total employment in Kentucky.

A worksite wellness tax credit would increase the number of worksite wellness programs particularly in smaller companies Cabinet for Health and Family Services

Page 36: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Worksite Wellness Programs: Impact Findings

Kentucky lacks much of the needed specific information on worksite wellness programsHow many work in the wellness service field?Turnover rates in companies in the state with

wellness programs ? How does the morale differ in companies that have

wellness programs? How does the productivity differ?Health outcomes associated with workplace

support

A state-wide detailed assessment of current worksite wellness program practices is needed.

Cabinet for Health and Family Services

Page 37: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Preliminary Recommendations

Enact the tax credit billConduct an in depth assessment of worksite

wellness programs in the stateRecognize the worksite venue as a means to

improve health of Kentucky residents – not just employees

Incorporate tax credit criteria to include programs to assist families improve health

Kentucky economy can be improved through worksite wellness programs

Cabinet for Health and Family Services

Page 38: Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Public Health Back to the Decision Table

Cabinet for Health and Family Services

QUESTIONS?

[email protected]@[email protected]